Tad Eareckson - 2012/05/17 12:12:12 UTC
Like I care, Tad.
What makes you think for a nanosecond that I thought you would?
But when you go around making statements like:
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=607
Understanding Tow Releases
Peter Birren - 2011/09/18 22:27:52 UTC
Uh, sorry Tad. "
TadErcksn@aol.com" is still a member of the Towing List. I did bounce Warren and one other guy but not you. Guess it must be easy to think you're ridiculing someone else when you do it to yourself so easily.
and you interfere with my posts it undermines your credibility. And getting people in these sports to undermine their credibility is one of my favorite hobbies.
To friggin bad if your email doesn't get approved until I get home.
1. Lemme fix that sentence for ya:
---
Too friggin' bad if I don't approve your post until I get home.
---
Let's not put out the impression that this is a passive thing.
2. You are never in a million years gonna be qualified to approve or disapprove anything I've got to say. It's not always a great idea to do something just because you CAN.
Suck it up and tough it out.
1. "Suck it up..." Now WHERE have I heard that expression before... Oh yeah.
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
weak links
Jim Rooney - 2007/07/22 22:30:28 UTC
I've heard it a million times before from comp pilots insisting on towing with even doubled up weaklinks (some want no weaklink). I tell them the same thing I'm telling you... suck it up. You're not the only one on the line. I didn't ask to be a test pilot. I can live with your inconvenience.
Some really great company you're keeping there, Peter.
2. You have the power to determine when and if what I say gets circulated here. You DON'T have the power - or the pay grade - to tell me what to do.
Is this the same Tad thats been kicked off just about every group on Yahoo?
Nah Miller, I've only been kicked off one group on Yahoo. They took a vote and the dregs won out by a two thirds majority.
Zack C - 2010/11/23 05:23:34 UTC
In September of 2010, hang gliding safety activist Tad Eareckson entered a discussion on the Houston Hang Gliding & Paragliding Association's discussion group that would result in his being banned from the group within two months. But despite the controversy over Tad's 'arrogance' and 'condescending tone,' I was impressed by his knowledge, logic, and respect for science, which included a great deal of his own research and experimentation. My attempts to carry out a rational discussion with him were continually sabotaged and eventually aborted by other group members, many with little interest in or comprehension of the discussion.
I wished to continue the discussion, and I knew others in the group were interested in it as well. But Tad had been banned from every group he entered to date, so we needed a place of our own where knowledge was prized over personality. And thus the idea for Kite Strings (
http://www.kitestrings.org) was born.
Given the power the dregs hold over these sports I was absolutely stunned by the narrowness of the margin.
I've been kicked out of just about every other glider group on the planet but I don't feel like tallying them up right now. But this one:
Mission Statement and Site rules for HangGliding.org
No posts or links about Bob K, Scott C Wise, Tad Eareckson and related people, or their material. ALL SUCH POSTS WILL BE IMMEDIATELY DELETED. These people are poison to this sport and are permanently banned from this site in every possible way imaginable.
dating back to three Novembers ago is pretty typical. (I'd think people in a country which is always sending lotsa soldiers off to the Middle East to get blown up on the pretense of fighting for our constitutional freedoms and minority protections would find scum like Jack Axaopoulos grotesquely repugnant but - hey - this is hang gliding.)
Seems like a crap load of rambling.
1. That's OK, Miller. I'm pretty sure a high school physics book would seem to you like a crap load of rambling. It does to just about everyone else in hang gliding.
2. I note you're saying "seems". Going by how things SEEM in aviation is a really bad idea. For example... Hitting the gas because it SEEMS like the glider on the other end of the line is hooked in and ready to go can be a really bad idea. (Talk to Bille Floyd about that one if you're not thoroughly convinced.) Sometimes you need to check things out a little more thoroughly.
Yup, the one and the same Tad who also recently got booted from USHawks.
1. Tad didn't GET booted from US Hawks. Bob Kuczewski booted Tad from US Hawks. (Wasn't all that recently either - over five months ago.)
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=929
Training Manual Comments / Contribution
Warren Narron - 2012/01/06 18:55:32 UTC
Going against the grain here, but someone has to point out that the probable best candidate to write a training manual has been banned from this site.
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=929
Training Manual Comments / Contribution
Bill Cummings - 2012/01/10 14:04:59 UTC
Tad's procedures for aerotowing should become part of any training manual.
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=992
Continuing Saga of Weak Link and Release Mechanism Failures
Warren Narron - 2012/03/04 16:03:16 UTC
No one wants to admit they are wrong and Tad Eareckson, is right.
2. There IS NO US Hawks.
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=883
What will keep the US Hawks from becoming another USHPA or HGAA?
Bob Kuczewski - 2012/03/14 15:15:03 UTC
There are lots of things to learn from Tad's case. I am not convinced that I did the best thing and I think it's good to talk about other alternatives.
US Hawks is one of many figments of Bob's fevered imagination. I told him if he booted me I'd make what he did blow up in his face. I did.
(Little suggestion for anyone needing to interact with Bob... Whenever he says anything understand that he's thinking the precise opposite.)
I haven't kicked him out of here (yet) because maybe, just maybe, there'll be something worthwhile in one of his monologues.
1. How would you know, Peter? You've never put any effort into understanding anything that required more than two or three paragraphs worth of attention span.
2. Remember thirty-one years ago when the stupid Attention Deficit Disorder dregs who ran USHGA decided that no one in the membership should have the right to hear what Donnell had to say? (I do - and I remember how I felt about it.) Good to see you carrying on the noble tradition.
3. The reason I came over here the better part of a month ago was to address an issue Sunny raised. His response to my response was:
Sunny Stutzman - 2012/04/24 16:04:40 UTC
Good info.
4. I'd rather be ripping up all the lunatic crap Stuart's written about weak links (which is modeled on all the lunatic crap Donnell wrote about weak links) than responding to a bunch of attacks but... This is hang gliding and here we are.
(but if someone should make a righteous suggestion....)
I'll be MORE THAN HAPPY to make a righteous suggestion. (You probably wouldn't like it much though.)
Glad to hear your double Linknife is serving you well. Should be about as fool-proof as it gets. (right?)
Sure Peter. Unless...
British Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association Technical Manual - 2003/04
On tow the Pilot in Command must have his hand actually on the release at all times. 'Near' the release is not close enough! When you have two hands completely full of locked-out glider, taking one off to go looking for the release guarantees that your situation is going to get worse before it gets better.
...you have two hands completely full of locked out glider and you really can't afford to allow the situation to get any worse taking one off to be able to blow tow.
Kinda reminds me of the situation Lois Preston was in at the end of October last year on her second solo aerotow - and the last flight of her sixteen year long life (not counting the chopper ride - which we probably shouldn't 'cause she never regained consciousness).
My personal schedule can take credit for the 9:42 difference but your (or somebody's) server has to take the blame for the 11 days.
1. This has absolutely nothing to do with anybody's servers. I didn't e-mail my post. I used the website - as always.
2. Look at the messages page and note the date and time on Post 8161.
3. Click on Post 8161 and compare the date and time.
4. The eleven days was probably a software thing but as long as you're arrogant and clueless enough to think you have justifications and/or qualifications for interfering with my post submissions I hold you accountable.
---
Posted:
2012/05/17 12:12:12 UTC