Weak links

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=28290
Report about fatal accident at Quest Air Hang Gliding
Glenn Zapien - 2013/02/12 16:57:34 UTC

I am sorry for the news. Never was excited about aero towing enough to try it.
Yeah, well he didn't die aerotowing. He died because the focal point of his safe towing system abruptly stopped him from aerotowing at the worst possible time...
Donnell Hewett - 1981/10

Now I've heard the argument that "Weak links always break at the worst possible time, when the glider is climbing hard in a near stall situation"...
...when the glider was climbing hard in a near stall situation.
I have done alot of scooter.
Using the standard aerotow weak link Steve Wendt tells you to in Will's Wing's Blue Sky Scooter Towing Method video?
Deltaman mentioned using a mouth release.
That was designed by his sociopathic role model, Tad.
Doesn't that deserve a look...
Sure it does, Glenn. Everybody now pause in the discussion for fifteen seconds or so to give it a look and then continue talking about:
- the best technique for coming off a launch dolly
- how to perform the trick of pulling a one point glider in quickly enough to prevent a Davis Link induced stall
- whether we should be using ballistic parachutes to make aerotow launches safer
- how effective a tail plane would be in preventing tumbles at from 150 feet
...to possibly have changed the outcome?
Not really following you here, dude. I missed the part where somebody was trying to dump the glider off tow but couldn't. I was under the impression that things only started going south when his Industry Standard instant hands free release kicked in and he tried to fly away.
I mean, wouldn't it be prudent to look into different release methods that can be done without removing much needed hands off the basetube to release in such a situation?
Yeah. Now would be the PERFECT time.

- We know from decades of past experience that at most maybe one person every three years or so will implement the technology we and the Russians have made available.

- This will help take the focus off of the two issues that killed him.

- The Flight Park Mafia will be able to get away with it's strategy of writing this off as a freak accident.

And everybody can continue discussing the proper way to pro tow and...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=12682
Landing on your feet (for AEROTOW)- So Dangerous
Jack Axaopoulos - 2009/06/29 14:26:26 UTC

OMG!!! You dont even have wheels!!?!?!?!? Image
YOURE GONNA DIE FOR SUUUUREE!!!! Image
Image
I have a brilliant idea. People who cant land for sh*t.... LEARN TO LAND Image That way when a weak link breaks on you, ITS A NON-ISSUE. Genius huh??? Image
...LEARNING TO LAND. That way when a weak link breaks on you IT'S A NON-ISSUE.

By the way, Jack... I don't think we've heard your voice yet on this one. Aren't you at least gonna come out and say:
"NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo!"
Fuckin' idiot colony.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

P.S. Hey Glenn... Remember THIS:

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=12403
weak link table

Your response to my efforts to get a minimum one G weak link rating on the books and enforced, Post 16:
2009/06/12 02:13:40 UTC - 3 thumbs up - Scott C. Wise
2009/06/12 00:24:58 UTC - Sink This! -- Paul Hurless
2009/06/14 18:32:52 UTC - Sink This! -- Glenn Zapien
2009/06/12 00:46:53 UTC - Sink This! -- Fred Bickford
2009/06/12 02:27:36 UTC - Sink This! -- Allen Sparks
So fuck you, dude. The more weak link he'd had the better his chances of survival woulda been.

And fuck you too, Allen, for that one. You've got blood on your hands for that.

You wanna do some more good than talking about how diminished you are by Zack's death then get behind the right side on this one and condemn in no uncertain terms your vile little buddy Rooney, his friends, and everybody who ever signed him off on anything.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/12 18:00:27 UTC
Miguel - 2013/02/11 22:25:23 UTC

Why not refute Deltaman's points. Tune him up, so to speak.
Your second statement is why.
I just buried my friend and you want me to have a nice little discussion about pure speculation about his accident so that some dude that's got a pet project wants to push his theories?

Deltaman loves his mouth release.
BFD

I get tired as hell "refuting" all these mouth release and "strong link" arguments. Dig through the forums if you want that. I've been doing it for years but unfortunately the peddlers are religious in their beliefs so they find justification any way they can to "prove" their stuff. This is known as "Confirmation Bias"... seeking data to support your theory... it's back-asswards. Guess what? The shit doesn't work. If it did, we'd be using it everywhere. But it doesn't stand the test of reality.

AT isn't new. This stuff's been worked on and worked over for years and thousands upon thousands of tows. I love all these egomaniacs that jump up and decide that they're going to "fix" things, as if no one else has ever thought of this stuff?

But back to the root of my anger... speculation.
Much like confirmation bias, he's come here to shoehorn his pet little project into a discussion. Please take your snake oil and go elsewhere.

Tune him up?
Yeah, sorry... no.
This is so fuckin' pathetic it doesn't need any comment whatsoever - 'cept to reiterate that underground ain't a bad place for ANYBODY who would maintain so much as a diplomatic relationship - let alone a friendship - with this vile little piece of shit.

(For the moment anyway. I'm undoubtedly gonna have a lot of fun with it when things slow down a bit.)
Tormod Helgesen - 2013/02/12 18:15:49 UTC
Oslo

I'm with you here Jim...
Yeah, big surprise here Tormod.
...Deltaman just startet an argument with me on a subject we agree on, the man is clearly deranged.
Cool. You assholes keep burying your asshole friends and the Kite Strings contingent will keep on being clearly deranged. And there's gonna be some point at which people start altering their perceptions on who is and isn't clearly deranged.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

miguel,

I'd just as soon that Antoine not interact with Davis's favorite little cocksucker over there but...

That was HIS response to YOUR post. In anything remotely resembling a civilized rational society he'd have been torn to shreds and permanently ostracized.

He's the front man for a dangerous malignant growth on this sport and he really needs and is at the moment extremely vulnerable to a solid blast of radiation therapy.

If you wanna have a major positive impact on the sport you're probably never gonna have a better opportunity than you do right now. Please either rip Rooney's throat out or give Antoine (and my work) some support. Both would be great but ferchrisake do fuckin' SOMETHING.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=28290
Report about fatal accident at Quest Air Hang Gliding
Steve Seibel - 2013/02/12 21:37:48 UTC

Brain fart on my part. Of course you are right. With 3-point (2-bridle) towing...
It's a fuckin' TWO point bridle, Steve - PILOT and GLIDER. Count 'em.
...the main weak link doesn't "know" whether the other end of the main V terminates in two attachment points (the pilot's shoulders) or just one. It just knows that the angle of the main V is opened to 60 degrees, not acute like 20 degrees.
I wouldn't be entirely sure about that - a lot of this is dependent upon where the flying is done. At both Florida Ridge, where DocSoc was half killed by a standard aerotow weak link failure two and a half years ago, and Quest Air, where where Zack Marzec was totally killed by a standard aerotow weak link failure one and a half weeks ago, if you put a weak link on the other end of a bridle the main weak link is IMMEDIATELY and ACUTELY aware of what's going on and doubles it's breaking strength.

You've gotta be very careful applying physics to hang gliding applications because hang gliding is tends to be highly sensitive to the effects of opinions - especially the opinions of people who have huge track records.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=28290
Report about fatal accident at Quest Air Hang Gliding
Jack Barth - 2013/02/12 20:15:45 UTC
So Cal

AT

Watched a guy pull in hard as he left the cart and hold that position making it very difficult for the tug pilot. Afterwards he got a butt chewen. He did a whole bunch of ground skimming which put the tug in severe jeopardy.
WHOA! DUDE! It's always been MY understanding that it's impossible for the glider to put the tug in any kind of jeopardy if you're using a standard aerotow weak link.

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
weak links
Jim Rooney - 2007/07/22 22:30:28 UTC

Hahahahahahahahaha
Oh that's just rich!
Riiiiiight... it's my attention span at issue here....
and I'm the one that's arrogant!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA

No, I'm not being nice. No, I do not feel the need to be nice. You're trying to convince people to be less safe. I don't want to be on the other end of the rope when someone listening to this drivel smashes in.

I've heard it a million times before from comp pilots insisting on towing with even doubled up weaklinks (some want no weaklink). I tell them the same thing I'm telling you... suck it up. You're not the only one on the line. I didn't ask to be a test pilot. I can live with your inconvenience.
Inconsiderate bastard must've snuck in line with a doubled up standard aerotow weak link.

So if the fucking tug was being put in "severe jeopardy" by the glider then what was stopping him from either:
- dropping down to the glider's level; or
- dumping it?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=28290
Report about fatal accident at Quest Air Hang Gliding
Davis Straub - 2013/02/12 18:11:58 UTC

I think that the argument that has been made is that a stronger weaklink would perhaps have helped by keeping the pilot connected to the tug...
Oh. You THINK that the argument that has been made is that a stronger weaklink would PERHAPS have HELPED by keeping the pilot connected to the tug?

But, hell, it's just an ARGUMENT.
Donnell Hewett - 1980/12

Now I've heard the argument that "Weak links always break at the worst possible time, when the glider is climbing hard in a near stall situation"...
And who really wants to keep ARGUING about this for another third of a century when we can just listen to the folks who actually know what they are talking about, slap on a Davis Link, and go up and make cute hang gliding videos.
...a mouth release would have allowed the pilot to get off earlier.
Hell, Davis... Even the shoddy crap you sell...

2:01
4:03
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-i4owd0akd0


...would've allowed him to get off whenever the fuck he felt like it. A lot of this shoddy crap works just fine whenever everything's going fine.

AGAIN... NOBODY WAS INTERESTED IN ABORTING THE TOW AT ANY POINT BECAUSE - RIGHT UP TO THE POINT THAT THE DAVIS LINK BLEW - THERE WAS NOTHING THREATENING ABOUT THE SITUATION.
Mouth releases are quite interesting. They allow the pilot to quickly and automatically release early in the tow, say the first three seconds.
Well, why would anyone...

Image
http://ozreport.com/pub/images/fingerlakesaccident2.jpg
http://ozreport.com/pub/images/fingerlakesaccident3.jpg
Image

...be interested in doing something like that?
Something that is quite difficult with a barrel release.
Difficult. But, of course...
The Herald on Sunday - 2009/01/10

Hurt hang glider pilot joked bravely with friends after a crash landing, unaware that his injuries were fatal.
...not IMPOSSIBLE.

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3391
More on Zapata and weak link
Paul Tjaden - 2008/07/22 04:32:22 UTC

I have never had a lockout situation happen so quickly and dramatically and had no chance to release as I have always thought I could do.
You just have to really focus on what you're doing. And it never hurts to do some visualization exercises while you're waiting in line while all the Davis Linkers get back in front of you for free relights.
If something bad happens while you are on the cart but not up to flying speed mouth releases are superior.
Right Davis. Once you're up to flying speed on an aerotow it's PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for anything bad to happen that would necessitate an immediate, no control compromise release. Just read the excellent book, Towing Aloft, by Dennis Pagen and Bill Bryden.
Once you are at flying speed then there is less of an advantage for mouth releases.
OBVIOUSLY. And since problems on the cart are pretty much totally avoidable by anyone competent enough to be able to walk and chew gum there's really no need to go up with anything better than the shoddy crap you sell.
Still they are quicker to release and you don't have to take you hands off the base tube.
Yeah, but we've already established that there's really no reason you'd ever need to be able to do something that. So we'll just continue using the stuff the Quest has been perfecting for twenty years, forget about the asshole pro tower who just tumbled and died at Quest, and discuss really important issues like the best way to get a parachute open from a whipstall at 150 feet.

Go fuck yourself.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=28290
Report about fatal accident at Quest Air Hang Gliding
Steve Seibel - 2013/02/13 00:36:34 UTC

The purpose of the tow line is to apply thrust.
Which, in hang gliding, is ALWAYS a BAD thing...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
weak links
Jim Rooney - 2007/08/01 19:49:30 UTC

It's more of this crappy argument that being on tow is somehow safer than being off tow.
...something barely tolerably, something that must be mercilessly limited at all times by a loop of 130 pound test fishing line - regardless of how many relights it takes to get a glider up to workable altitude.
The thrust is used to overcome the drag of the wheels, and to overcome the air drag of the glider and pilot and cart, and to accelerate (overcome the inertia of) the glider and pilot and cart. Why does a sudden increase in cart wheel drag (due to wheels wobbling) matter?
Yeah! And why should a little ankle high brush in the middle of the path matter when you're running at full tilt on a dark night?
Why does this make the glider pitch forward and the caribiner slide higher on the V-bridle?
What do you expect the carAbiner to do when the glider pitches DOWN? Weld itself to the midpoint of the bridle out of concern for you?

I guess I can see that there would be a tendency for the glider to pitch forward unless the pilot jams his arms forward aggressively. Would jamming the arms forward aggressively help in this particular situation, i.e. a sudden increase in cart wheel drag?

It looks to me like the rougher/softer the field or the more prone the wheels are to wobbling, the more advantage there is to towing with pro-tow (shoulders only).[/quote]
How many fucking BILLIONS of two point dolly or wheel launched aerotow flights get off the ground just fine every year?

- ALL:
-- tandems
-- solo students
-- training and lower performance gliders

- the vast majority of midrange gliders

- a fair percentage of high performance gliders flown by people who don't feel they're good enough pros to handle the kind of situation Zack thought he could a week and a half ago

Eight and a half years ago Davis and a bunch of his douchebag buddies get on carts they KNOW are defective/unstable and as dangerous as the shit towing equipment they're using and Davis gets his goddam face shoved through the undersurface. Big fuckin' surprise.

So now you're gonna go off on this insane tangent buying into this bullshit Mister Pro Toad is feeding you that "pro tow" is SAFER than TWO point - in a discussion that's SUPPOSED to be about an incident in which a guy was bludgeoned to a soon to be lifeless pulse in no small part because he was pro toad.

UN FUCKING BELIEVABLE.

I've said this before, Steve, but you are majorly hurting in the common sense department.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=28290
Report about fatal accident at Quest Air Hang Gliding
Davis straub - 2013/02/13 01:10:29 UTC

To begin with the pulling force of the tug is placed much higher with a V-bridle (2 or 3 point aerotow setup) than is the case when you are being pulling from your chest.
Yeah Davis, pretty close to the centers of mass and drag - which ain't such a bad idea on a towed aircraft.
There is a lever between where the tug is pulling and the base tube on the cart.
So just what does an idiot goddam pin bender like you really understand about levers?
When the cart suddenly stops...
Maybe you should think about using equipment that doesn't stop suddenly a second or two prior to liftoff - like they do in REAL aviation.
...you are pulled around your base tube and nose down.
Well, YOU are anyway.
As your nose goes down, the carabineer slides even further up the V-bridle.
So what he's saying, Steve, is that it's really OK to use crappy launch equipment on crappy takeoff surfaces as long as you're pro toad - and you don't really need to worry about any associated control issues once you're airborne down in the kill zone because Davis has never had any serious problems.

Stay with him. He's an excellent mentor. You'll feel really safe following whatever he tells you regardless of what it is. And Rooney and he are great friends.

But if you wanna work with someone who can spell "carabiner" you might think about giving Zack a shot.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=28290
Report about fatal accident at Quest Air Hang Gliding
Steve Seibel - 2013/02/13 02:40:40 UTC

tow dynamics

A couple more thoughts--

- I believe that with 3 point towing...
It's fuckin' TWO POINT towing, Steve. Start listening to the people who know what they're talking about and stop listening to the fuckin' idiot pro toads who caused and facilitated this one.
IF the upper point is at the or near the hang point, the bar position is different than with pro tow...
ONE POINT.
...but the bar force is not.
The bar force to WHAT? If you're on a slow pitch stable glider one point behind a fast tug you're gonna be holding a million pounds of bar pressure to hold the glider down into position and your arms are gonna turn to rubber.
In other words the pitch torque experienced by the glider for a given pilot force on the bar is the same as with pro tow. For example when the pilot is exerting no force on the bar, all the tow force ends up being transmitted directly to the hang point. Regardless of whether towing pro-tow or 3-point.
For the last part of that - YES. And now you understand why Donnell Hewett was and is full of shit on his center of mass Skyting "theory" of towing hang gliders and why the hallowed two to one bridle is a useless piece of crap.
- However, with 3-point towing, moving the upper attachment point forward on the keel changes things dramatically.
No, it DOESN'T. It's a gradual incremental change as you move up the suspension and forward on the keel. It's not all that much of a big fucking deal from inch to inch.
In flight, the glider's nose-up pitching tendency is decreased. The pilot needs to exert much less nose-down force on the bar to keep the glider in position.
Yes.
By the same token, a given nose-up bar force by the pilot results in less net nose-up pitch torque on the glider. To exert the same net nose-up pitch torque on the glider, the pilot much push forward much harder when towing 3-point with a forward keel attachment point, than when towing 3-point with the keel attachment point near the hang point, or when towing pro-tow.
OK, let's spread the word to all the new Hang Two Falcon flyers so they'll be aware of the problem they're having with this.
This is extremely relevant to what happens when the cart wheels start shimmying, creating drag, and exerting a nose-down pitch torque on the glider.
SO DON'T USE A CART WHOSE WHEELS START SHIMMYING.
It looks to me like the pilot towing 3-point with a forward keel attachment point should push out hard in this moment, to keep the glider from nosing over.
Jesus H. Christ. With all the REAL problems we've got with towing...
- So we need to be careful to not mix apples and oranges, and if a pilot is towing 3-point with a forward keel attachment point, not to give the same advice about what force to exert on the bar while rolling on the cart, that we would give to a pilot towing with pro-tow, or with 3- point with the upper attachment point at the hang point.
WE WHO?

Put the fuckin' glider on the fuckin' cart, wait a couple seconds after it starts getting buoyant, fly it off.
With the forward keel attachment point, there may be a greater need to push forward hard when the cart wheels generate extra drag and exert a nose-down pitch torque on the glider.
- USE A CART THAT'S *NOT* A PIECE OF CRAP.

- USE A RELEASE THAT *DOESN'T* STINK ON ICE SO IF THE CART *IS* A PIECE OF CRAP YOU CAN ABORT THE TOW INSTEAD OF BREAKING YOUR FUCKING NECK AFTER SLAMMING YOUR HEAD INTO THE KEEL.
- Also, with any bridle configuration, when the cart wheels start shimmying and making drag, this will exert a nose-down pitch torque on the glider. There will always be some requirement for the pilot to push forward harder on the bar in a case of severe shimmying, to hold angle-of-attack constant, i.e. to hold bar position constant. But more so with the 3-point with forward keel attachment.
What did I just say - AGAIN - about carts?
- At the end of the day, bar position equals angle-of-attack. By the time we approach flying speed, we want the glider to be at the correct take-off angle-of-attack, i.e. at the correct bar position for our particular bridle set-up, whether the cart wheels are shimmying or not. Shimmying wheels will mean we have to exert forward bar force to hold that bar position and angle-of-attack, but won't change the bar position associated with that angle-of-attack. It's when we are significantly below flying speed and not at risk of flying off the cart in a stall, that it makes sense to push the bar substantially forward of the take-off position to reduce the odds of a nose-over as we accelerate, especially on soft ground or with shimmying wheels. Especially with 3-point towing with a forward keel attachment point.
Earth to Steve, Earth to Steve...

We just killed a pro toad in no small part because he was being pulled forward and the glider wasn't. Therefore he lost a foot and a half of pull-in range and he couldn't keep the nose down when he REALLY needed to.

And then his:
- Rooney Link kicked in to clearly protect him from an excessive angle of attack
- angle of attack went INSTANTLY through the ceiling
- Wouldn't it help to make the main (upper) V-bridle much longer? The more acute angle might tend to resist sliding on the caribiner.
NO. The line of thrust will be EXACTLY THE SAME.

And don't get into a situation in which the glider's gonna pitch down 'cause if you do you're gonna be fucked.
Also, wouldn't a larger forward component of tow force continue to be delivered to the pilot, even as the glider started nosing forward?
What did I just say?
- My upper V-bridle is longer than average. Not by any special intent. I'll measure it.
You're using a Wallaby Release with the brake lever velcroed to the downtube and a bent pin "backup" release. Fuck what you're using for a bridle.
- This thread has morphed substantially;
Goddam right it has. BY DESIGN. To distract everybody from the fact that this motherfucker was killed 'cause he was being pro toad with a Davis Link.
...by contributing to the discussion re noseovers I don't mean to take anything away from our reflection on the recent tragic accident at Quest.
- You have - exhaustively.

- This wasn't a tragic accident. It was a long overdue godsend.

- The tragedy is that you assholes are derailing the discussion at the critical period in which the non shithead crowd will be able to get through to some of these Jack and Davis Show morons, gut Davis and Rooney, and fix these problems.

- Either get back on your meds or shut the fuck up for a month or so.
Post Reply