http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=4095
Should we stop search engines from indexing our Forum?
Should we require an account to read the forum to stop search engines from accessing posts.
DEFINITELY. You CERTAINLY don't want the general public - or even other established hang gliding people - reading about you guys:
- launching unhooked 'cause nobody will do or teach hook-in checks
- snapping your arms in half at the Kagel Happy Acres putting green because you have better control authority with your hands on the downtubes
- smashing your heads into the large rocks strewn all over your narrow dry riverbeds because your better at hitting traffic cones in the middles of LZs than you are at hitting the LZs themselves
- harassing small flocks of Condors so you can get good pictures of them stampeding away
Yes - 57% - [ 4 ]
No -- 42% - [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 7
Just FOUR in favor? And THREE *OPPOSED*?!?! C'mon guys, this one's a no brainer!
Orion Price - 2013/08/07 15:54:05 UTC
Whereas it is easy and quick to make a phpbb forum account.
Sorry, was that supposed to be a sentence?
Also how search engines are annoyingly reading and indexing our accounts of life in the SHGA:
You think SEARCH ENGINES are annoyingly reading and indexing your accounts of life in the SHGA? You REALLY need to spend more time checking out how annoyingly I'M reading and indexing your accounts of life in the SHGA.
I propose we require an account to access our Forum.
In the proud tradition of such photophobic cockroach colonies as Houston and the Peter and Davis Shows.
Robert Bustamante - 2013/08/07 20:33:24 UTC
Yep... sounds good.
Then maybe we can keep freaks out who want to drag in issues on rapists, and child molestation.
Any chance you're talking about...
http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3840
[TIL] About Tad Eareckson
Bob Kuczewski - 2013/03/10 18:20:34 UTC
Eventually (and for reasons that I won't full disclose here) it became necessary to ask Tad to leave the US Hawks forum and he is currently the only person who's been completely banned from the US Hawks.
...Bob? Yeah that pretense of concern about going public with sensitive and irrelevant personal issues was a bit much, wasn't it?
We ever figure out who that freak was?
Which freak? The pedophile rapist or the person who's favorite hobby is outing the pedophile rapist?
NMERider - 2013/08/07 21:44:59 UTC
You M-F! I just about pissed myself.
NMERider
I voted for Bob after spending a very enjoyable hour on the telephone with him a few months ago. My impression of Bob is that he is a level headed and enthusiastic supporter of both hang gliding and paragliding, and above all: SAFETY.
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8143/7462005802_bbc0ac66ac_o.jpg
Orion Price - 2013/08/07 23:48:40 UTC
Indexed forever. Like everything else.
And backed up - just in case.
Douglas Martens - 2013/08/08 00:17:23 UTC
Approve a user before they post?
USHPA raised our dues and claimed inflation without specific documentation.
It turns out hiring a social media specialist was necessary. Many companies are moving into social media these days. Including paraglider groups.
We have a members only section. Apps like facebook have different levels of security - which may or may not be secure at all times.
If social media was useless why would investors stock purchases make Mark Zuckerberg $3.8 Billion In One Day.
I fear the days are gone when you could wreck your hang glider anonymously.
GOOD. Thank you GoPro, YouTube, and people on the web who blurt out accurate accounts before the handlers get to them. As The Industry gets better and better at suppressing information technology makes it easier and easier to document and publicize it. And it's really cool when you can find out the name of the asshole who signed him off.
Orion Price - 2013/08/16 00:23:34 UTC
Approve a user before they post?
No, Just prevent a search engine from indexing our posts.
Can't have that. Wouldn't want people checking back on that crap you wrote about my understanding of physics and what you said you were gonna do in the way of weak link testing then watching you pop off tow at two hundred feet on the orders of your 130 pound Greenspot Pilot In Command.
There are too many reasons why we...
Who the fuck is "WE", OP? Where's the list of people who authorized you to speak on their behalf? Dead giveaway. Whenever someone uses that pronoun in that kind of context you can rest assured you're dealing with a certified motherfucker. Bob hasn't gone first person singular since age three.
...don't want engines to have control of our content.
I've got search engines crawling all over Kite Strings 24/7. So far I'm pretty sure that not one of them has altered a single punctuation mark.
At off all the reasons we don't want indexing; Busto is the #1 reason.
What's your #2 reason? (Please let it be me.)
Robert Bustamante - 2013/08/16 00:41 UTC
Thank you?
Earlier I was referring to a thread, which was placed in our forum several months back. Without getting into details, it involved someone trying to make a comparison of a club member to a known pedophile, rapist.
You mean THIS:
http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3840
[TIL] About Tad Eareckson
Orion Price - 2013/03/13 05:52:48 UTC
Why does the world contain Raffertys and Tad Earecksons?
comparison, motherfucker?
When I saw it, I could only think of the perverted mind, which took the time to make the comparison.
Which would be OP - as far as I can tell.
Thankfully most members didn't see the post...
THANKFULLY most members didn't see the post? If they didn't see the post how do you know they agree with you that it's a good thing they didn't see it? Or do you, like OP, feel qualified to define what everyone's thoughts and opinions should be?
...due to our mediators extinguishing it right away.
Good for your mediators then. I have absolutely no doubt that all the people who were protected from seeing the post will be eternally grateful - as I know I certainly am.
The post was the reason our forum was shut down for a few days.
You mean here:
http://www.kitestrings.org/post3990.html#p3990
There are those who believe otherwise, but if the thread was not written, or even if the individual had owned up to the hideously, perverted act, our forum never would have been shut down.
I'm having a real hard time figuring out why it was necessary to shut the whole forum down for several days because someone posted something. Look at the crap I let Bob get away with before I belatedly and permanently banned the motherfucker. I didn't need to delete or even edit anything - let alone take the whole goddam forum off line. And if anybody gets irreparably damaged by reading anything here - GOOD.
I was disappointed that our site was shut down, and a few members had to spend their time correcting the problem.
I so do hope I played at least some small role.
I can't remember any other time our forum was shut down because of a thread, and I hope it never happens again.
I'm going for just the opposite.
I was under the impression that you might be working on something to protect us from something like this from happening again.
I'm sure happy you stupid petty assholes are more concerned about working on something to protect yourselves from something like that from happening again than you are about working on something to keep somebody from getting slammed in and killed because of a 130 pound test focal point of a safe towing system increasing the safety of a towing operation again. I haven't had a good laugh in a while.
I see that the thread's back up, the last post has been deleted - without comment - and THIS:
Robert Bustamante - 2013/08/16 03:55:33 UTC
I agree!
Thank you?
is standing in its place. What a bunch of petty useless twats.