You are NEVER hooked in.

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
Steve Davy
Posts: 1338
Joined: 2011/07/18 10:37:38 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Steve Davy »

http://ushpastore.com/products/hook-in-vinyl-sticker
Image
HOOK-IN VINYL STICKER

Durable all-weather vinyl safety decal for the basetube of your hang glider.
Why is it just "for the basetube" of my hang glider? Why not "for the kingpost" of my hang glider?

I figure that I'd be way better off with this worthless "safety decal" out of my sight just prior to launch.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Gee, I hope they don't get sued by any surviving family members for not having made available such a simple and obviously bulletproof effective safety device eons ago. (Right...

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5492/14666057035_1786a4e18c_o.jpg
Image

...Rebar Dan DeWeese?)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHOzFOm4gWo
North Port man survives life-threatening hang gliding scare
NBC2 News - 2018/11/27

ᐸpᐳA North Port man came within thousands of miles of dying.ᐸ/pᐳ ᐸpᐳᐸ/pᐳ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHOzFOm4gWo
Everyone who's ever lived on the planet has CONSTANTLY been within thousands of miles of dying - you morons. Whenever I drive into town on Generals Highway I'm within ten or fifteen feet of dying a good chunk of the time. And I find that distance to be a reasonably comfortable safety margin.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.huffpost.com/entry/dad-charged-hot-car-deaths_n_5d3db82ce4b0ef792e0ddfaf
Dad Charged With Homicide After Infant Twins Found Dead In Hot Car | HuffPost
Nina Golgowski - 2019/07/28 13:22

Rodriguez, who's identified as a licensed clinical social worker and Iraq War veteran, had just completed an eight-hour shift at James J. Peters VA Medical Center in the Bronx.

His court appearance came one day after his twins were found lifeless while strapped in their rear-facing car seats as he left work on Friday around 4 p.m., local station CBS 2 News reported.

"I assumed I dropped them off at daycare before I went to work," Rodriguez told police officers who arrived on the scene, according to court documents obtained by ABC News. "I blanked out. My babies are dead; I killed my babies."

The infants' body temperatures measured 108 degrees, according to the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner. Temperatures in the city on Friday were over 85 degrees.

The criminal charge of negligent homicide carries a maximum of four years in prison while the manslaughter charge carries up to 15 years, Rodriguez's attorney, Joey Jackson, told CNN.

"This was just a horrible mistake," Rodriguez's neighbor, Tony Caterino, 45, told the New York Post. "That one time you make a mistake, and you have to live with it for the rest of your life."

A family friend who lives with the Rodriguez family described him to the Post as "an amazing guy."

"He's always been there for his kids. Always. This is just a horrible situation," said Temple Barros, 41. "The family isn't doing so well."

There have been 23 deaths of children left in hot cars so far this year. The annual national average is 38 deaths - or one every nine days - though 2018 saw a record-setting 52 deaths, according to the nonprofit Kids And Cars.

"In over 55% of these cases, the person responsible for the child's death unknowingly left them in the vehicle," a website for the children's safety organization states.
Yeah, let's make stiffer criminal penalties for these assholes so's they'll start taking their parental responsibilities SERIOUSLY.
...while strapped in their rear-facing car seats...
"I assumed I dropped them off..."
"...the person responsible for the child's death unknowingly left them in the vehicle..."
Fuckin' rear-facing car seats are fatalities waiting to happen - and NOBODY's trained on how to handle the threat. But when a parent takes his or her kids to the beach and one of them gets eaten by a Bull Shark it's always, only, entirely the Bull Shark's fault.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.kidsandcars.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Heatstroke-SafetyTips-2019.pdf
KidsandCars.org | KidsandCars.org is a public safety awareness website for child safety around automobiles.
LOOK BEFORE YOU LOCK

Make sure your child is never left alone in a car:
- Make it a habit of opening the back door every time you park to ensure no one is left behind.
049-35807
http://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4856/46206628272_99634e9aee_o.png
Image

And DON'T open it. Keep It Simple Stupid. If you make it more complicated, require more time and effort, people won't do it. If you're just LOOKING you're also THINKING. And that's all you need - at the parking space or on the launch ramp.
---
P.S... - 2019/07/29 18:10:00 UTC

...Kids and Cars idiots... Cite ONE example of a parent just looking and forgetting and roasting a kid.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

So guess what Amazon dropped off on the front steps early yesterday afternoon.

http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51957060859_5634513b1f_o.png
Image

(Baby shower gift - HM's circle of friends.)

So I went online and checked out the owner's manual - and found exactly what I was expecting to.

http://us.britax.com/media/13017020/p03810200a_user-guide-marathon-ct-us_web.pdf
Britax - The #1 Brand in Safety Technology.
Britax Child Safety, Inc.

MARATHON CLICKTIGHT
User Guide


Safety Information
!WARNING!

Failure to follow all warnings and instructions could result in SERIOUS INJURY or DEATH.

Important Notes
- Cover the child seat when the vehicle is parked in direct sunlight. Metal parts of child seat could become hot enough to burn a child.
Not one single fucking syllable regarding the risk of roasting your kid (or, as per our most recent example, kids) to death in the back seat. Guess what, parents... If you put your kid in contact with a metal part hot enough to burn everybody's gonna know about it within three milliseconds. Forget that your kid's in the rear facing car seat in the back, lock the car, go to work... Nobody's gonna know about it until 17:12 that evening and your kid will have died eight hours ago.

Those things are death traps - fatalities waiting to happen. Your kid's gonna be a thousand times better off in the backseat rear-facing child seat every time you have a head-on collision but the price is you're gonna risk killing him every time you buckle him in on a sunny day when the temperature's a bit above freezing.

Those motherfuckers know about and understand this issue. But lotsa their customers don't. If they start putting a warning in their owners' manuals now then they're gonna get sued out of existence by a parent with a roasted kid who made a purchase before the advisory started getting published.

The federal and state governments... Your kid died as a consequence of our regulation mandating that you secure him in a backseat rear-facing child "safety" seat to keep him safe. Nah, much easier and less complicated to keep charging the totally destroyed ex-parents with negligent homicide. Also do nothing to educate the public to understand that this can very easily happen to ANYBODY 'cause that undermines the legitimacy of our charging the totally destroyed ex-parents with negligent homicide.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.shga.com/forum/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?t=6167
Unhooked Launch
Mike Ivey - 2020/10/10 16:57:31 UTC

Hi Everyone,

I launched unhooked at Garlock last weekend (Sat Oct the 3rd). I’m completely fine, the glider has some damage. But I wanted to use this time to write up my thoughts on what contributed to try to help other pilots.

This was my second flight back since a long break. I had flown at Avenue S the previous week, but the last flight before that was in June.

We started the trip with plans to fly Ave S again, but when it looked weak in the LZ in the morning we pivoted and went out to Garlock instead. After helping launch the other pilots, I launched last. I carried the glider to launch unhooked, this is my normal habit. However, when I got to launch, I stopped to take a breather. The cycles had been on and off all day, and soon after a good cycle started, so I picked up the glider and began my launch run.

Luckily I had picked a long ramp and it was a good cycle, so I was still on reasonably flat ground when the control bar reached my head and I realized something was wrong and stopped my run. Second lucky thing was my brain jumped the right way at that point and I let go of the glider instead of grabbing on tighter. The glider flew off, banked left, and slid into the hill to the left of launch.

So why did this happen? Like most failures to hook in, it's a confluence of factors and a failure of habits. After stewing on it a bit I’ve identified the following as contributing:

- Because we were going cross country, I had all my gear in my harness and my winter clothing on, so my harness felt much heavier and tighter than normal. This put me out of my comfort zone and muscle memory during my walk up.

- I had not flown in a while, so my habits were a little rusty. Combined with that, I was at an unusual site, so there wasn’t anything (like a hook-in sign) to reset me and habits.

- I was pretty nervous about the flight overall. It was the first time flying my higher performance glider in a cross country situation, so I had been thinking a lot about my plan for the flight to ensure I could have a good landing site I was comfortable with. I was thinking about this a lot on my walk to launch as well.

- Unlike Kagel, there is no good or obvious “setup” area by launch to stop and do a hook in check, so when I stopped at launch it was basically at the top of my ramp run. Typically I will stop and do a hook in check before I get on the ramp proper - but I wasn’t able to do that here because of the geography.

- As stated above, the launch conditions were shifty so I got impatient and based my actions on the conditions, not my checklist. I did not do a hook in check before my launch run, I used to do one but haven’t in a while.

Overall, my takeaway is that I need to revisit the habits that I had thought were sufficient - notably letting my hook in check habit lapse and letting my hang check be mentally triggered by the Kagel geography are major long term issues that I need to fix.

Hope this helps, this was a (relatively) painless way for me to learn this lesson, and it's definitely a preventable mistake.
Hi Everyone,
Everyone? If ya wanna talk to EVERYONE you need to be on the worlds largest hang gliding community.
I launched unhooked...
Your glider did. You didn't. If you HAD there'd have been a good chance that your buddies would be writing this one up.
...at Garlock...
35°25'09.81" N 117°51'01.44" W
...last weekend (Sat Oct the 3rd). I’m completely fine...
No you're not. You weren't fine before the incident and you're not really any better now. And you lost a day of flying you'll never get back and damaged your glider.
...the glider has some damage.
1. Describe it.
2. Make sure you let Katherine Yardley know about it. She thinks it's a riot when our birds get trashed in that neck of the woods.
But I wanted to use this time to write up my thoughts on what contributed to try to help other pilots.
Yeah, the guys who've survived unhooked launches are always the ones who have the best ideas and insights on how to prevent them. Just ask Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney. Also the guys...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1166
Thoughts on responsibility...
Scott Wilkinson - 2005/10/05 14:10:56 UTC

We visited Steve Wendt yesterday, who was visibly choked up over Bill's death. For Steve, it all comes down to one thing: you've got to hook in. Period.
...who've rated them.
This was my second flight back since a long break.
You should fly more frequently. That does marvels for unhooked launch prevention.
I had flown at Avenue S the previous week, but the last flight before that was in June.
Maybe spend more time at...

08-12302
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8787/28748851353_f02093047c_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8368/29336365476_1e548866c7_o.png
12-12403

...Dockweiler.
We started the trip with plans to fly Ave S again, but when it looked weak in the LZ in the morning we pivoted and went out to Garlock instead.
Good thing you didn't have options like Lockout, Henson, Whitwell, High Rock, McConnellsburg...
After helping launch the other pilots...
Zero percent of whom did actual compliant hook-in checks. Hey Mike... Does it concern you that if you couldn't prevent yourself from initiating an unhooked launch you'd have also been one of the scores of useless dickheads checking and assisting Bob Gillisse, Bill Priday, Kunio Yoshimura right before they left their ramps without their gliders?
...I launched last.
Bummer.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4247
Hook in failure in New Zealand
Jim Rooney - 2006/09/24 21:19:29 UTC

There isn't one sure-fire answer.
If there was, we'd all be doing it already. This thread I think makes this obvious... every single thing people have put forth as "the way", someone else has show how it can fail. Every single one. Argue about the details, but every single one fails.

Argue if you will about the examples (whatever), the trick of it isn't the method to me, it's how using new things doesn't work (and actually causes problems) in strange ways (like when going back to "normal" flying after getting used to the new method/device).

Enough about what doesn't work though... what does?
Since we don't have a plug that only fits one way, we fall on lesser methods, but some are better than others...

In particular... Third Party Verification.
You won't save you, but your friends might.
Not always, but they're more reliable than you.
No friends left. You were pretty much totally fucked at that point.
I carried the glider to launch unhooked, this is my normal habit.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=13359
Today was a bad day!
Mike Bomstad - 2009/08/26 04:21:15 UTC

The harness is part of the aircraft... end of story.
(Just because it's easy to remove, does not mean it should be. Dont choose the path of least resistance)

Attach it to the wing, completing the aircraft.... then preflight the completed aircraft.
Buckle yourself into the cockpit and then your ready.
11-A12819
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8339/28924980016_2ba1d20ef7_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8253/28924975726_0d24a615c2_o.png
13-A14319

I don't do NORMAL HABITS. I just keep running threat assessments, thinking about the worst thing that could possibly happen at any given moment. And that mindset has never not worked for me on this issue. Has it ever stopped me from launching unhooked? Probably not. But it WOULD HAVE *IF* I'd ever gotten myself into a situation like yours.
However, when I got to launch, I stopped to take a breather.
Don't stop to take a breather next time. Problem solved.
The cycles had been on and off all day, and soon after a good cycle started, so I picked up the glider and began my launch run.
Good thing you didn't lift your glider up to the stops. That would've given you a false sense of security. And gawd only knows what might've happened within the next few seconds.
Luckily I had picked a long ramp and it was a good cycle, so I was still on reasonably flat ground when the control bar reached my head and I realized something was wrong and stopped my run.
Note to self. Pick a long ramp and wait for a good cycle. That way if I'm not connected to my glider I'll still be on reasonably flat ground when the control bar reaches my head and I'll realize something is wrong and stop my run.
Second lucky thing was my brain jumped the right way at that point and I let go of the glider instead of grabbing on tighter.
Which is what our instincts have us doing at the critical fraction of a second.
The glider flew off, banked left, and slid into the hill to the left of launch.

So why did this happen?
Because you're too fuckin' thick to read...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=31781
Another hang check lesson
Image
https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7916/31540774647_f71ed7cd5e_o.png
http://www.energykitesystems.net/Lift/hgh/TadEareckson/FTHI.pdf

...my article, watch Jan's videos, take a look at this now 956 post thread.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13132
Unhooked Death Again - Change our Methods Now?
JBBenson - 2009/01/25 16:27:19 UTC

I get what Tad is saying, but it took some translation:
HANG CHECK is part of the preflight, to verify that all the harness lines etc. are straight.
HOOK-IN CHECK is to verify connection to the glider five seconds before takeoff.
They are separate actions, neither interchangeable nor meant to replace one another. They are not two ways to do the same thing.
(And here I'd been thinking that the overall hang gliding activity level had dropped off too catastrophically for us to have another one of these inside of the next decade.)
Like most failures to hook in, it's a confluence of factors and a failure of habits.
Bullshit. You don't GET to tell anybody what the problem is a week after coming close to killing yourself on the issue. This is not a HABIT thing. You don't aim a gun at somebody's head and pull the trigger 'cause you've always made a HABIT of unloading it when you're not intending to shoot something.
After stewing on it a bit I’ve identified the following as contributing:
1. Lucky us.

2. Fuck you. What's been stopping you from stewing on the untold scores of other people's unhooked launches? I didn't need to experience an AT lockout crash to realize it could happen to me and do the engineering required to pretty much eliminate the threat.
- Because we were going cross country, I had all my gear in my harness and my winter clothing on, so my harness felt much heavier and tighter than normal.
And that's always a way above average indicator of a proper connection to your glider. Foot launches are demanding and dangerous so anything that bolsters your confidence level is a major plus.
This put me out of my comfort zone and muscle memory during my walk up.
So if you'd been in your comfort zone you'd have been OK. Got news for ya, Mike. Being in your comfort zone while on a ramp ranks right up there with being on a launch cart behind Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney in the list of the two most dangerous locations in the sport. This asshole:

07-04806
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5595/14078184404_8c8a3a5df5_o.png
Image

is in his comfort zone 'cause he made sure he was safely hooked in back in the setup area just five minutes ago.

09-05019
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2928/13891086719_3ba7e65d38_o.png
Image

Safely hooked in.

10-05124
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2933/14074543322_a183cc3a23_o.png
Image
- I had not flown in a while, so my habits were a little rusty.
Yep. It's a real bad idea to fly when your habits are a little rusty. Always best to leave it in the bag for another week or two while your habits will be less rusty.
Combined with that, I was at an unusual site, so there wasn’t anything (like a hook-in sign) to reset me and habits.
You should keep a few hook-in signs in the trunk for situations like this. Those things work miracles for resetting us and our habits. And HABIT is the CRITICAL ISSUE regarding this particular threat.

Somebody cite me from the entire world history of the sport ONE report of one of these signs, plaques, checklists, nose wire telltales interrupting an unhooked launch sequence. There are TONS of these at high volume launches and they don't work. If the sight of the boulder-strewn slope three hundred feet below the top of the escarpment doesn't do the trick then nothing else has a snowball's chance in hell.

Here's my thought for a sign twenty yards shy of the ramp:
WELCOME HANG GLIDER PILOTS!

1. If you're not positive that upon reaching launch position you'll be scared a minimum of two thirds shitless that you're about to launch unhooked do not proceed beyond this point with a glider.

2. If you're not positive that you'll be scared a minimum of two thirds shitless that the glider you're assisting is at extreme risk of launching unhooked from now until it's too late to do anything about it do not proceed beyond this point with the intent to crew.

3. Aussie Methodists proceeding beyond this point will be shot on sight without further warning.

4. Have a nice day. :)
It won't work for 99.5 percent of participants 'cause nothing ever does but it would be fun to see the sign on the eleven o'clock news shortly after the next one.
- I was pretty nervous about the flight overall.
Great. Ya know what I'm pretty nervous about? When I'm:
- foot launching a dangling carabiner and/or empty leg loops
- AT launching:
-- some fucking moron on a Dragonfly fixing whatever's going on back there by giving me the rope
-- the focal point of the Dragonfly's safe towing system increasing the safety of the towing operation
- thermalling plowing into another glider
- approaching:
-- powerlines at the downwind end of the field
-- trees at the downwind end of the field
- landing that my tires are adequately inflated

It's a really shitty idea to be nervous about the flight overall. Think about being nervous one thing at a time chronologically.
It was the first time flying my higher performance glider in a cross country situation, so I had been thinking a lot about my plan for the flight to ensure I could have a good landing site I was comfortable with.
A GOOD landing site you were COMFORTABLE with? Where's the challenge and fun in that?

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27396
Scooter tow faillure... or Never Land On Your Face
Mitch Shipley - 2012/10/22 19:04:16 UTC

We engage in a sport that has risk and that is part of the attraction.
Image

(Same asshole who's about to run off the cliff at Whitwell totally confident that he's...

03-03107
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2931/14074550972_3161a4a62e_o.png
Image
Image
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5038/14097754513_33226dd131_o.png
04-03229

...still safely connected to his glider.)
I was thinking about this a lot on my walk to launch as well.
Maybe you're thinking about this stuff a lot too much on your walk to launch - and not thinking at all about your most immediate and potentially lethal threat at all. (Obviously.)
- Unlike Kagel, there is no good or obvious “setup” area by launch to stop and do a hook in check...
Yeah, Kagel..

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5492/14666057035_1786a4e18c_o.jpg
Image

What's the worst that could possibly happen at an awesome, high volume, mainstream launch like Kagel...

http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5566/14704620965_ce30a874b7_o.png
Image

Ground Zero for Joe Greblo's Four Or Five Cs.
...so when I stopped at launch it was basically at the top of my ramp run.
How convenient.
Typically I will stop and do a hook in check before I get on the ramp proper - but I wasn’t able to do that here because of the geography.
1. And there'd be no fuckin' way you'd be able to stop and do a hook-in check AFTER you get on the ramp proper.

13-03110
http://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3697/13700915564_87a2a336b0_o.png
Image
14-03129
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2912/13700562685_86575e9220_o.png
Image
15-03302
http://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3793/13700560875_5fcffd7d77_o.png
Image

Turning around to make sure you had your backup hooked and carabiner locked could easily prove fatal before you'd even thought about starting moving.
- As stated above, the launch conditions were shifty so I got impatient and based my actions on the conditions, not my checklist.
Fuck your checklist. I used to use an extensive checklist at Ridgely. But it was ONLY to help me get everything put together and prepped sequentially and efficiently at setup. And when everything was I parked the car back at the lot and stowed it. It had NOTHING to do with safety. That shit's simple and critical and you need to have it hard wired in your head. A checklist used instead is nothing but a potentially lethal distraction.
I did not do a hook in check before my launch run...
There's no such thing as a hook-in check more than five seconds prior to initiation. After five seconds it's well past its expiration date and needs to be immediately flushed down the toilet, considered a false memory. NOBODY can safely remember a hook-in check beyond that interval in such a critical situation. Is the gun unloaded? I dunno... Let's point it at the ground and pull the trigger. CLICK. Yeah, probably.
I used to do one but haven’t in a while.
Where to even BEGIN...
Mike Ivey - 86546 - H3 - 2010/07/24 - Kenneth Andrews - FL FSL TUR
That's the last I have on him. We need to aim unloaded guns at all the motherfuckers who signed him off on anything and pull the triggers.
Overall, my takeaway is that I need to revisit the habits that I had thought were sufficient - notably letting my hook in check habit lapse and letting my hang check be mentally triggered by the Kagel geography are major long term issues that I need to fix.
If that's your takeaway on this one you seriously need to find another hobby.
Hope this helps...
Oh fer sure. Monumental wake-up call. This will most assuredly put an end to people letting their hook-in check habits lapse.

WHAT TO WE WANT?
- OUR HOOK-IN HABITS NOT TO LAPSE!
WHEN DO WE WANT IT?
- NOW!!!
...this was a (relatively) painless way for me to learn this lesson...
In (relatively) stark contrast to the way you learned your lesson to...

32-1901
Image

...not final into serious windsock poles.
...and it's definitely a preventable mistake.
But let's totally ignore the guy who wrote the fuckin' book on HOW to prevent this mistake and take our leads from all the assholes who are now highly esteemed experts on the topic by virtue of their having had first hand experience with it.

http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3840
[TIL] About Tad Eareckson
Mike Blankenhorn - 2013/03/12 16:07:44 UTC

We should bury this thread and not give Tad the satisfaction that we are actually wasting our time acknowledging his existence. Yes, this needed to be brought into the light but now we should bury this asshole with some nice cold dirt (metaphorically) and never speak of him again.
We didn't bury the thread, Mike. But you show up as Last Active 2015/07/07 09:40:16 UTC. And nobody seems to be speaking of your ass anymore. Hope you're enjoying your tomb and keeping it warm for the rest of the participants in this sport.

As I'm posting this there's a 2020/10/10 17:00:14 UTC followup post - also with zilch substance - from Mike and to other responses. Also of course nothing on Davis, Jack, Bob. Un freakin' believable.

Huge thanks to Jonathan for wiring me 2020/10/11 03:00:38 UTC for a notification on this one. Probably saved me at least half a day.
User avatar
NMERider
Posts: 100
Joined: 2014/07/02 19:46:36 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by NMERider »

Tad Eareckson wrote:....Huge thanks to Jonathan for wiring me 2020/10/11 03:00:38 UTC for a notification on this one. Probably saved me at least half a day.
I truly wish I had no reason to pass this along.
There have been a few other FTHIs in the area the past 6 months as well.
It is regrettable to see so much hand-wringing and excuse-making in the SHGA post.
I would rather see a post which states the author prevented an FTHI by:
1 - Adapting the loaded gun philosophy (I am always unhooked)
2 - Fear of launching unhooked
3 - Simple verification of lifting the glider while on the ramp until there is a tug on the thighs.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

There have been a few other FTHIs in the area the past 6 months as well.
Jesus H. Christ...

http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=5376
hook in faliure (almost)
Joe Greblo - 2016/09/29 17:07:54 UTC

I watched another pilot launch unhooked using your (Jonathan's) technique.
As many agree, all systems can fail when you fail to use them.

I believe the absolute largest cause of failures to hook in can be attributed to the pilot's belief that it won't happen to him because he has a good system.

Greg Kendall's technique is centered around several "hook in" checks while on launch, and timed as closely to the launch run as possible.

Windsports supports this concept by promoting adherence to 3 principles.....

1. Due to the many possible distractions on launch, I'm a good candidate for a hook-in failure.
2. Your hook-in check expires every 15 seconds.
3. A hook-in check should be the last thing you do before the decision to run. If not, do it again.
Do get in touch with Greblo and let him know we don't have nearly enough C's to get the situation under control.
It is regrettable to see so much hand-wringing and excuse-making in the SHGA post.
I have no clue WHAT I'm seeing. Is it excuse-making? Maybe. But if it is it's being done in response to something going on that we're not seeing.
I would rather see a post which states the author prevented an FTHI by:
1 - Adapting the loaded gun philosophy (I am always unhooked)
2 - Fear of launching unhooked
3 - Simple verification of lifting the glider while on the ramp until there is a tug on the thighs.
1 and 2 are pretty much the same thing. 3... Zack C says he can't do it with his relevant geometry. He was trying to do it on the outing at which he filmed:

2-112
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7600/28811055456_925c8abb66_o.png
Image

And:

048-35714
http://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4870/44440235230_79b8e6eab9_o.png
Image

So I say do the lift and tug IF YOU CAN (and fuck all the absurd bullshit associated hazards that your Bobs, Joes, Toms throw up to derail things). And if you have the mindset and physical capacity you WILL do it without any prodding.

But if you CAN'T do it the mindset alone should do the job anyway.

Mike's 2020/10/03 was textbook. He was out of his normal element and his shoddy idiot routine came totally and near catastrophically unglued. And never for a millisecond did his confidence in his procedures and readiness status waver a hair's breadth.

If you approach and reach launch position with 0.1 percent uncertainty about those two critical issues you're NOT gonna LAUNCH until after you've dealt with the aforementioned uncertainty. I run off the ramp assuming I've fucked something up and thinking about what my options are if I actually have. I don't start breathing easy until several seconds after I'm flying and there wouldn't be much I could do anyway. And those seconds are NOT pleasant. But they make me as bulletproof as humanly possible.

We've had zillions of incidents over the decades with only a rather tiny percentage of them fatal and never once has anybody said, "Yeah, I couldn't quite remember whether or not I'd caught my leg loops but I had three guys on my wires and fifteen gliders in line behind me so I said what the fuck - 'CLEAR!'"

If you have the mindset and just THINK ABOUT IT that'll be enough. And if you think you'll be OK as long as you thought about it fifteen seconds ago you no way in hell have the mindset and you're no better off than any of these other Greblo, Denevan, Taber, LeFay, Galvin, Wendt, Voight, Rooney products. And you're also highly unlikely to catch anybody else.

http://www.shga.com/forum/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?t=6167
Unhooked Launch
Mike Ivey - 2020/10/10 17:00:14 UTC

Janyce (Collins) suggested that Greg Kendall's hook in procedure has been a helpful one for people to review in the past, so I dug it up from an old post and will share it here as well. It's given me a few things to think about - especially the point about hooking in at setup vs the ramp is one I'll have to reconsider.

http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3638
FTHI
Greg Kendall - 2015/11/25 18:39:36 UTC
Janyce (Collins) suggested that Greg Kendall's hook in procedure has been a helpful one for people to review in the past, so I dug it up from an old post and will share it here as well.
Great. Some of the best minds in the business referencing some of the other best minds in the business.
It's given me a few things to think about...
Pity id didn't give you a few things to think about BEFORE you banged up your glider and killed yourself for the purpose of the exercise last weekend.
...especially the point about hooking in at setup vs the ramp is one I'll have to reconsider.
Be my guest. The gene pool can't handle much more of this trend.

The post is, of course, total rot. I already chewed it up 2015/12/01 02:30:55 UTC at:
http://www.kitestrings.org/post8738.html#p8738

When and for a long time after I entered the sport in the spring of '80 I always assumed that there had to be a cluster of intelligent life somewhere in the upper echelons. Pagen, Robertson, Hewett, a few thermal XC jocks had me snowed for a while and I figured some of the designers of some of these cool clean new wings had to have things together. By Ridgely those suppositions were starting to erode but I still was thinking that if I could just engage them directly...

Now I'm thinking about what I'd have done if I'd had a crystal ball and concluding that I'd have wanted no more to do with these scummy assholes and their enablers than I do now. I think human flight is super cool and hang gliders allow us to conduct it at reasonably close to raptor class in the soaring department. I still feel more of an attraction to hang gliders than I do to sailplanes - despite what they have on us in the way of performance. But the human crud with whom you get forced into approximation and inevitable fall under the control of...

Sailplane culture... They watch this shit and don't do anything about it; filter into this sport, drink the Kool-Aid by the gallon, happily enforce it as Industry Standard. Think Trisa. Can't get much worse than that. Oozing with Tim Herr DNA.

I'd been thinking that the sport's culture would be in line with what we have in the tiny list of contributors to this forum but no way in hell / never in a million years. Nah, this isn't a path I wanna take - although I do wanna keep the friends who've collected here. Six weeks shy of a decade now but the future's looking pretty bleak - in a lot of categories. Praying that by the beginning of next month at least some issues will start looking considerably less bleak.

Still no further discussion at Grebloville.
User avatar
<BS>
Posts: 422
Joined: 2014/08/01 22:09:56 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by <BS> »

Praying that by the beginning of next month at least some issues will start looking considerably less bleak.
Just got back from personally delivering my early ballot, directly to the precinct office. I've also signed up for BallotTrax Notifications, which will let me know if the ballot is accepted, or not. Experiencing more angst about being counted than ever before.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Me too. If that Biden asshole gets enough fraudulent votes America will NEVER be made great again again.

P.S. I think it would be a really good idea for you California guys to get out and rake some of those dead leaves and twigs out from the floors of some of your state forests.

And still no response to the Mike Ivey at Grebloville.
Post Reply