instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://forums.chgpa.com/viewtopic.php?t=5923
Daniels Friday 7/5
Mark Cavanaugh - 2013/07/19 02:40:14 UTC

The point of these forums is to engage in conversation/ Q&A , not pontification.
Wow Mark. And here I was thinking that:
Mark Cavanaugh - 2022/03/07 08:06:25 UTC

...a forum is a poor substitute for meaningful conversations.
Pick one.

The more highly evolved one is an absolutely moronic meaningless statement. (And here I was thinking that the longer we played in this aviation game the smarter we got about it.)

It's not a SUBSTITUTE - of any quality - for a conversation - of any quality. It's a MEANS of conversation. Like talking, sign language, drums, smoke signals, signal flags, signal lights, pen and paper, printing press, photographs, telegraph, telephone, radio, motion pictures, television, internet... The quality of the conversations depends upon the intelligence, competence, characters of the moderators and participants. Granted, you motherfuckers have zilch going for you but that's no fault of the technology or medium.

And great job...
Mark Cavanaugh - 2022/03/07 08:06:25 UTC

Family and friends of Ward who may be checking into our forums for the first time might be unaware that we are deliberately not posting very much at the moment.

That's intentional. We don't want to add to their burden.
...on clamping down on damn near every useful molecule of meaningful information on that one - at the moment - to solidify your position on your shitty little forum being a poor substitute for meaningful conversations.

Did the point of these forums undergo a radical transformation at some point in the intervening years? And just note the author of the next post.
Ward Odenwald - 2013/07/19 03:11:45 UTC

"too-little/too-late?" - not even close to going it alone. Pilots in the air, observing the last one in the air is not the best possible arrangement but significantly better than nothing at all or attempting to phone your wife or friend after the fact with the bad news.
And his last words known by and accessible to the public:

http://forums.chgpa.com/viewtopic.php?t=8047
Woodstock tomorrow, March 3rd
Ward Odenwald - 2022/03/02 12:16:10 UTC

Forecasts are looking good for Thursday afternoon. Any interest?
Not much, but we'll take it.

http://forums.chgpa.com/viewtopic.php?t=6098
Forum Charter : Flight-Related Topics *Read Before Posting*
chgpa - 2013/11/15 18:23:38 UTC

The Flight-Related Topics forum is intended for posts directly related to FLYING.

"Flight related" is a fairly broad term... But here are some examples of On-Topic issues that are obviously appropriate:
Where are people planning to fly on a given day
Weather forecasts, and their impact on flying plans
Car-pooling arrangements
Discussions about a given flying site's characteristics
Reports of how a flying day turned out
Photos/videos from a flying day
Tracklogs and descriptions of cross-country flights
Accidents/incident reports from pilots who ran into trouble at one of our area sites
Notification of accidents/incidents involving area pilots/friends which occurred at other sites
Site advice for new pilots
Cool new wings/gear that pilots crave
Fly-Ins
Routine/on-going site-maintenance
Introductions by new pilots ("Hi, I'm new around here!")
Reports of how a flying day turned out
But if the flying day ended (real good bet that Ward was the last glider in the air) in a fatality a fair bit shy of the LZ make sure that nobody release any information whatsoever about experiences of other gliders, conditions at any point.
Accidents/incident reports from pilots who ran into trouble...
But they gotta be from pilots who ran into trouble. So they can't have been in so much trouble that they ended up dead or vegged. And obviously no one else is allowed to comment. 'Specially those who weren't even on site.

And it's gotta be...
...at one of our area sites
...AT the site - within a 1.5 mile radius of the midpoint between launch and the day's designated primary LZ. Beyond that it's totally obviously area-site irrelevant.

And it's gotta be at one of OUR area sites. If Ward had bought it at Currituck or Lookout... Who gives a flying fuck? Absolutely nothing to do with our u$hPa chapter. Guess we now know why the 2015/03/27 Arys Moorhead was of zero interest to anyone in the Capital club. Not even a mention of Mitch Shipley permanently demolishing himself at Tater Hill circa 2019/10/01.

And let's not forget:

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1149
Team Challenge: Daily Update Thread
Holly Korzilius - 2005/10/01 18:19:55 UTC

Incident at 2005 Team Challenge

I don't have many details at this point, but I just got a call from Scott Wilkinson. Bill Priday launched from Whitwell without hooking in. Scott indicated there was about a hundred foot drop off from launch. Bill's status is unknown at this time. Please pray for him!

I will provide updates as I get them from Scott.
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1166
Thoughts on responsibility...
Bill Priday - from his sister

Deanna Priday - 2005/10/13 20:31:31 UTC
Guess we don't want any more posts like that one - out of the deepest concerns for minimizing trauma to family members.

Area pilot. Trained and qualified at an area school/operation. (Same as Holly. And we all know how well that worked out for her - as well.) But to way in hell an area site. So how come those discussions haven't been deleted?

My last post prior to my three month suspension... 2008/12/11 00:56:16 UTC. Thanks guys. An honor head and shoulders beyond all the ratings I ever got from u$hPa.

It's highly unlikely that Ward's drag chute accidentally deployed prior to final. And when we do see deployments they're all way the fuck high. And even if he had had an accidental deployment we've never seen Ward going onto a final - with or without chute - other than way high and way wide. I'm pretty much totally baffled by this one. Gotta congratulate you guys on your suppression of anything/everything of any possible substantive value in understanding this one.
03/03/22 – Ward Odenwald

Ward Odenwald (71), an USHPA intermediate (H3) pilot, USHPA member since 1980, suffered fatal injuries hitting a tree during a landing approach.
I'm sure Ward is up there looking down on this one glowing with pride and affection.

http://forums.chgpa.com/viewtopic.php?t=7286
Learning from a HG accident
Ward Odenwald - 2017/06/13 01:54:39 UTC

Walt et al., have raised important issues concerning last Saturday's Pulpit crash that we need to act on! Forum exchanges are good and, in addition, I believe that personal/group discussion(s) will also enhance our chances of making a lasting safety difference. To this end, I suggest that we meet at my place (Woodbine, MD) to help define the best-safest way forward. We can get together on June 23rd (Friday evening) if we have a consensus among interested pilots (HG and PG). I'll follow up with more details once we agree to meet.

Please post if you can participate.
http://forums.chgpa.com/viewtopic.php?t=7296
Pulpit HG Accident June 10, 2017
Ward Odenwald - 2017/06/28 02:37:14 UTC

Tev, thanks for sharing the details! Remarkable write up considering all the sh**t that you are currently suffering! Your description is loaded with details that will help us - especially your mindset leading up to flying, the LZ conditions/approach decisions and your foresight for medical insurance. Collectively, we (our flying community) have made all the mistakes that triggered to your crash but have been lucky enough to escape major injury. It's my hope that we use your recommendations to improve the safety of our flying.

Thanks,
Ward
Name me one record of one individual family member, close non family relation ever expressing an objection of any degree of any detail of a legitimate report or responsible comment on any aspect of the incident. I'm having a hard time even imagining a scenario in which that would occur.

Michelle Schneider, mother of Arys Moorhead, didn't know anything about hang gliding before 2015/03/27 and wanted to know way less than that to this day. And I can totally understand, accept, respect that. (And for what it's worth, Michelle... We did everything u$hPa asked its membership not to and made things moderately painful and expensive for the organization / surviving perpetrators.)

And if we look at the (surviving) family members of the victims of Boeing's two 737 MAX disasters... They all seem to wanna know every detail of what went wrong, have responsible individuals held accountable, sue the crap outta the corporation.

But good job on the cover-up. I've studied the crap outta this one and have found it near impossible to come up with a likely scenario. I was leaning towards the drag chute for a good while but when we see him using it he deploys it stupidly high with a brain-dead easy glide path to the field. Also when he doesn't deploy it.

Gliders have already landed. Either they’ve had all the airtime they've cared for or the lift has weakened to unsustainable. Either way there's no problem making the field.

And it's not likely that he'd come in low from elsewhere on the ridge to make getting back on the road to home convenient 'cause we've seen him land on bends near to the regular and bridge LZs.

Very strange 'cause he died as an obscenely over-accomplished/experienced USHGA Three. And a Three back when he got his required three consecutive foot landings within a fifty foot radius of a traffic cone or old Frisbee in the middle of the LZ. And we can at least see how much good that one did him when it really mattered.

I pretty much quit spots on 1982/07/05 when one effort in turbulent air over the pond at the base of the North Bowl turned me around, folded both of my Comet 165 downtube in half, submerged me under the wing.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21088
What you wish you'd known then?
Doug Doerfler - 2011/03/02 05:24:44 UTC

Nothing creates carnage like declaring a spot landing contest.
And we have no accounts or evidence of Ward ever practicing for or effecting an RLF approach - although he may well have died with the sign-off on his card.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Some of Ward's approaches to the field he will come up short of eleven months beyond the report on the 2021/04/04.

http://forums.chgpa.com/viewtopic.php?t=7831
Woodstock tomorrow (Tues, 8/25)
Ward Odenwald - 2020/08/27 00:32:18 UTC

Tuesday's forecasts indicated that the Pulpit would be blown-out so Rich and I decided to try our luck at Woodstock. Conditions at launch were less than ideal during the morning with a significant west cross but by 2:30 pm the tower weather station was indicating a consistent 290+ degree direction and soon after there were acceptable launch windows, albeit short lived. Given the variable air flow up the slot, Rich decided to wait for another day.

I took off at 2:56 with help from Rich and Joe Shad (who came out to help, Thanks!) and landed at 4:30. During the first 40 min, I basically bounced between 200 and 500 ft above the ridge line while trying to stay in small pockets of lift that I'd lose after a 180 or 360 turn. After that, I was able to stay in the lift and managed to climb above 3,000 ft MSL several times. My climb rates were between 150 and 300 fpm.

The first fairly decent climb took me to just over 3,800 ft. What was notable about this thermal was that there where 5 or 6 Ravens also climbing above me. Soon after reaching 3,000 ft, two of them dropped below me and started to circle. The guy in front inverted and then the second also followed. I guess they rolled over to get a better look at me or just to show off or both, whatever, I enjoyed seeing them. Unfortunately, none of the Ravens were in any of my photos.

I left each of these climbs while in weak lift as I was concerned about penetrating back to the ridge. The first 4 images are from the initial climb above 3 K and the last 5 photos show (in 30 second intervals) my approach into John McAllister's field.
Odenwald-7831-01
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53913414797_0be41a839a_o.jpg
Image
Odenwald-7831-02
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53914650699_94bb024ff0_b.jpg
Image
Odenwald-7831-03
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53914747910_2e69614bac_o.jpg
Image
Odenwald-7831-04
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53914747885_c84e54e75d_o.jpg
Image
Odenwald-7831-05
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53914650684_7db5bcb9b3_o.jpg
Image

http://forums.chgpa.com/viewtopic.php?t=7919
Options for Sunday Apr 4th : Woodstock?
Ward Odenwald - 2021/04/06 15:44:55 UTC

Here's some additional info to add to Mark's flight report:

As anticipated from the sound of the wind in the trees at takeoff, I found the thermals to be ass-kicking rockets. The first one took me from approximately 200 ft below the ridge line to roughly 4,000 ft above it (6,000 ft MSL) in less than eight minutes (images 3 and 4). My highest climb during the 2 hrs 11 min flight started about 2 miles south of takeoff just north of the Opechee Peak. This monster took me to 7,629 ft MSL (my 3-year-old vario's highest recorded altitude*) before I bailed on its weakening but respectable 250 fpm over the Fort Valley road (images six through eight). If I had stayed with it, I might not have made it back to the Massanutten ridge (image 9). My landing pattern (AKA: zigs and zags) over the LZ was intense with thermal triggered wind direction and air speed changes. It was an afternoon in the LZ when it was necessary to stay really close to the glider until it was packed up.

* The Ayvri display has always skimmed/cut my vario's altitude data by ~ 200 plus feet. I feel bullied!
Odenwald-7919
http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53914650689_d713ac1dfd_o.jpg
Image
Turning on final
http://forums.chgpa.com/viewtopic.php?t=7960
Woodstock tomorrow, June 15th
Ward Odenwald - 2021/06/16 20:57:17 UTC
Odenwald-7960
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53914548003_fee67cde23_o.jpg
Image

(Note gliders parked, being broken down in the breakdown area.)

No drag chute. Flies the patterns high and wide - as he always does in everything I've been able to find. He's not practicing for an actual tight field but he never lands in any anyway and that shouldn't have been an issue on his 2022/03/03. Nothing makes sense.

Accidental deployment of a drag chute or sidewire failure? Late in the approach? Conflict with another glider? Not bloody likely.

Did the ridge lift dial down somewhat abruptly while he was elsewhere and did he push his luck a bit too much to save retrieval bothers? Doubt it. Never seen him do anything like that before and have seen him land in fields in bends not far from the two regular fields.

(Started wondering if the (John T.) Fishburn pasture was still being used but found a Mark Cavanaugh post - 2022/09/24 03:49:41 UTC - referring to it as "the old primary". So it seems that the bridge / McAllister field has been the new primary for quite some time now.)

Anyway... I've got nuthin'. Every time I came up with something resembling an idea it got shot down by what I was seeing in the record.

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8051
Mishap -- Initial Report
Mark Cavanaugh - 2022/03/07 08:06:25 UTC

Family and friends of Ward who may be checking into our forums for the first time might be unaware that we are deliberately not posting very much at the moment.

That's intentional. We don't want to add to their burden. And a forum is a poor substitute for meaningful conversations.

But Ward has many friends here. So please know that he and you are in our thoughts.
It's near two and a half years later now, Mark. There's no way in hell any family and/or (nonflying) friends of Ward will be checking into your crappy forums for the first time to get anything of any actual substance on this one. "The moment" has come and gone.

Meaningful conversations? Ones in which relevant issues are addressed and SOPs and training protocols are modified accordingly? Show me something anywhere. And it's an extreme stretch to suggest that anything happening behind closed doors involving a select few is ever gonna be of any use to the public sport participants.

After Zack Marzec's Standard Aerotow Weak Link increased the safety of his towing operation it rather suddenly became acceptable to fly with Tad-O-Links. And when Jeff Bohl bought as a consequence of flying with a Davis mandated pro toad bridle and taking a hand off the control bar for half a second we heard absolutely nothing about his Tad-O-Link being a ghost of an issue for either of the involved aircraft.

There was never a goddam thing we were gonna learn from this one which would've resulted in the least tweak to training, SOPs, awareness of issues. But when you said:
...we are deliberately not posting very much at the moment.
that was an implication that there WAS information of value to the hang gliding public and a strong implication that information of value WOULD BE made available in the not too distant future. And near a year and a half has gone by and not the slightest whisper of information beyond the zero we got initially has been made available outside your circle of four or five co-conspirators.
Post Reply