The Bob Show

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Here's where you and Davis Straub are both pushing the same propaganda.
1. Ya know what, Warren?

I'm one of the most propaganda resistant people you're ever gonna meet.

Despite being solidly immersed in Christianity - including a daily dose of the Lord's Prayer and a Pledge of Allegiance to a nation under God in public school - I was a reasonably stable atheist by age eight.

I refuse to do hang checks.

I refuse to assume that I'm hooked in at any time prior to launch.

I refuse to fly standard aerotow weak links.

I maintain that hang gliders can't be controlled very safely with one hand.

When towing one point I use my incisors for something other than nothing.

I use straight pin releases.

On landing if a standup landing is gonna cost me a broken arm I'll belly in - even if it is conduct unbecoming of a hang glider pilot.

I don't seek out narrow dry riverbeds with large rocks strewn all over the place, fields filled with seven foot high corn, and spots for my landings.

I say that Donnell Hewett was clueless and that Dennis Pagen, Mike Robertson, and Steve Wendt are full of shit.

And I hate just about everybody.

2. Yeah, Davis Straub and I - and every climatologist with a triple digit IQ, a fuckin' clue, and no funding from Exxon-Mobile are pushing the same "propaganda". Davis is a low-life, lying, motherfucking piece of shit but if he says the sky is blue and I look up and see blue I'm not gonna argue that point with him.
He and you were both indoctrinated to believe what you believe.
Bullshit. I'm not that bad at thinking and Davis believes and says anything that's convenient at the moment.
Davis Straub, is a global-elitist wannabe that believes his type should rule the world.
And that differs from the US Hawks Hang Gliding Association and Southwest Texas Hang Gliders models how?
Where is your proof?
The ecosystems on this planet were doing very nicely up until very recently. So before YOU decide that it's perfectly OK to jack up the CO2 level another 42 percent over the level it's been for the past couple of hundred million years, how 'bout YOU proving that everything's gonna be just wonderful? 'Cause everything I'm seeing from the satellites and in my back yard strongly suggests otherwise.
Show me your scientific proof/connection that man's small contribution of CO2 in the big picture of global gasses causes destruction of the planet.
1. Define "SMALL" contribution?

2. What level do you think we should be shooting for to get this planet up to the level of quality God envisioned when he ran out of cylinders and had to make up the difference with nitrogen and oxygen?
How will trillions in taxes to Al Gore and globalist bankers cure it?
Cure what? I didn't think there was any problem.

Ice caps and glaciers aren't disappearing, Polar Bears are so thick we're having to import seals from Antarctica to keep them from starving, permafrost layers are getting thicker, high temperature records aren't falling like dominos, the Great Barrier Reef isn't getting bleached out, and hurricane force derechos aren't beating the crap out of the Mid Atlantic any more than is usual this time of year.
That its hot out? In July?
When I was a kid it was hot in July. For the past week and a half it's been fifteen degrees above hot in July, making international news, and killing dozens of people.
Al Gore, should tax you for breathing...
Bullshit. This isn't about exhaling. This is about digging and sucking up hundreds of millions of years worth of fossil carbon deposits, setting fire to them over the course of a few decades so we can set the thermostat to eighty in the winter and sixty in the summer with the windows wide open year round, and pretending nothing's gonna happen.
Do you feel like crying when you see new construction because bunnies are going to die?
No. I feel like crying when I see new construction because people and their little children are gonna live. And people are my single least favorite species to see and interact with.

Speaking of which...

Maybe you could persuade Bob to take a couple of hops on Sam's tow rig to see if they can recreate what went wrong with Terry's flight and get it on video. I think that's the only way we're ever gonna learn anything halfway useful from this one.
Warnarr
Posts: 32
Joined: 2011/03/31 20:10:40 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Warnarr »

I feel like crying when I see new construction because people and their little children are gonna live. And people are my single least favorite species to see and interact with.
And you don't think you have been indoctrinated to think this way?

It's eugenics stupid!

You and Davis are both spouting the same globalist elite propaganda. The probable difference between the two of you is that Davis believes himself to be one of the elite leader technocrats left to enjoy an unspoiled planet after 90% of the world's useless eaters are dispensed with or otherwise murdered. You on the other hand, may be sufficiently indoctrinated/damaged to willingly march into the pits to be killed, (like the Nazis marched the Jews) for the greater good of the planet.

Before you sacrifice yourself and all those around you, can you please show me what evidence convinced you
that CO2 is the driving force of 'nefarious' weather conditions. Are you aware that the computer models that Davis Straub, shills/parrots doesn't even factor in water vapor, which is the largest factor in "greenhouse gas."
Davis Straub, doesn't believe the sun has anything to do with the weather.
Is this what you believe?

Tens of millions will die from the CO2 global power scam promoted by Al Gore and Davis Straub.
Al Gore and Davis Straub are big fat liars.
Al Gore may know the truth and Davis Straub may just be an idiot.
Al Gore builds mansions on the beach and Davis Straub lives in a trailer.

CO2 spikes follow temperature spikes by hundreds of years.

If man were to cut all CO2 emissions by 50% overall greenhouse gas change would be negligible and millions of humans will die. That's the plan.

Al Gore will be living high on the hog and a few minions like Davis will be doing his laundry.
Warnarr
Posts: 32
Joined: 2011/03/31 20:10:40 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Warnarr »

Back to simple physics which has been ignored while millions die and you lose your freedom.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAOy7XzXYWA

http://ae911truth.org
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

And you don't think you have been indoctrinated to think this way?
No, I'm QUITE positive that I was indoctrinated to think that humans were divine creations, quite apart from everything else that grew on the planet, and would be rewarded for the proper flavor and degree of ass kissing with eternal life - and punished for skepticism with eternal roasting in Hell (even worse than the stuff that just killed those folk from this neck of the ex woods I referenced earlier.
It's eugenics stupid!
Well DUH! With Zack's help...
Zack C - 2010/11/23 05:23:34 UTC

The purpose of Kite Strings is to foster serious discussion regarding the practices and technologies of modern hang gliding. This is a forum ruled by science, truth, facts, reason, and logic. Anyone with a respect for these principles and a willingness to learn and engage in rational discussion is welcome to participate.
...I've created a little society from which people with majorly defective DNA sequences can be eliminated with just a few clicks of the mouse - once they cease to amuse me. That's why you haven't seen many posts here from Bob or Sam lately. (Not that you've been seeing many more posts from same on their forums lately either.)
You and Davis are both spouting the same globalist elite propaganda.
The primary purpose of Kite Strings is to spout elitist propaganda.

If you wanna hear propaganda spouted from the dregs go to The Davis Show, The Jack Show, The Peter Show, or USHGA. The Bob Show has been a bit quiet for the past few weeks but there's some really entertaining material in the archives.
The probable difference between the two of you is...
Let's look at one of the many DEFINITE differences between us.

Davis:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8331326948/
Image
Tad:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8312399698/
Image
...that Davis believes himself to be one of the elite leader technocrats left to enjoy an unspoiled planet after 90% of the world's useless eaters are dispensed with or otherwise murdered.
Is it OK if we start off with the shark fin soup crowd?
You on the other hand, may be sufficiently indoctrinated/damaged to willingly march into the pits to be killed, (like the Nazis marched the Jews) for the greater good of the planet.
And like Bob would happily march Yours Truly if he and his political allies could bag enough elections and referendums.
Before you sacrifice yourself...
Don't worry. I've got a few names in mind to start off with and see how things go.
...and all those around you...
ALL those around me? Can't I just do some - and pick and choose?
...can you please show me what evidence convinced you that CO2 is the driving force of 'nefarious' weather conditions.
Nah. Fried too many brain cells in the recent nefarious weather conditions. I can't remember any more.
Are you aware that the computer models that Davis Straub, shills/parrots...
1. Nah. I don't spend a lot of time following links posted by pin benders.
2. Careful how you use the term "parrots". They're not mindless playback machines.

Alex The Talking Parrot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6KvPN_Wt8I
falconrye - 2007/09/15
dead

And my parrot has demonstrated a lot better understanding of the principle of the second class lever than shitheads like Davis and Rooney with their combined efforts will ever be able to dream of attaining.
doesn't even factor in water vapor, which is the largest factor in "greenhouse gas."
Why is "greenhouse gas" in between quotation marks?

Is the implication that there's no such thing as a greenhouse gas, that different gases don't trap and retain heat at different efficiencies or don't trap and retain heat at all?

You've stated that water vapor is the "largest factor" so - whereas the theory of evolution is full of holes and open to healthy scientific debate in the public schools of Texas and anywhere else where federal enforcement of Constitutional protections is a bit on the anemic side - it appears that you're saying the phenomenon exists and different gases have different efficiencies.

So how does CO2 stack up against H2O?

If CO2 is more efficient than N2 and/or O2 (and I've heard that it is), then wouldn't the increased CO2 result in more warming and convert more liquid water into water vapor which, being the largest factor in "greenhouse gas", would accelerate the warming? That COULD explain a lot of the blue I'm seeing lately in the satellite photos of the Arctic Ocean. (Of course that could just be Al Gore touching things up with Photoshop.)
If man were to cut all CO2 emissions by 50% overall greenhouse gas change would be negligible and millions of humans will die.
If man WEREN'T to cut all CO2 emissions by 50% overall millions of humans will die.

If I miss tonight's episode of South Park millions of humans will die - at something about the rate at which they're born.

But if fewer humans are born - preferably fewer with DNA patterns similar to those of Davis, Rooney, Sam, and Peter - there will be fewer bulldozers clearing bunny habitat for McMansion construction and the humans who are around will have better quality lives and get to see more Box Turtles, Kestrels, Harriers, and meteor showers.
Al Gore will be living high on the hog and a few minions like Davis will be doing his laundry.
Oh good. Finally Davis will have something more commensurate with his capabilities than producing towing equipment, writing policy, running competitions, and participating in discussions involving higher level concepts such as the distinctions between the numbers one, two, and three.
Steve Davy
Posts: 1338
Joined: 2011/07/18 10:37:38 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Steve Davy »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1093
2012 and 2013 USHPA Regional Director Elections
Bob Kuczewski - 2012/07/11 18:26:07 UTC

You're absolutely right. I'm at Funston for a few days (which is out of Region 3), but I plan to do a lot of Region 3 flying so I can meet pilots and answer their questions this summer. Thanks!!

But one of the big problems I'll face is that I've been banned from both hanggliding.org and the Oz Forum. So it would be helpful if anyone who can post to those forums will let people know that I'm running and that they can ask me questions here on the US Hawks forum. That won't be so hard on the Oz Report, but it might be tricky on hanggliding.org since Jack (sg) has threatened to ban anyone who mentions my name. So post at your own risk!!!

By the way, this shows how much Jack is controlling the sport of hang gliding through his forum. He's able to control regional elections by blacklisting candidates he doesn't like. It's an ongoing problem, and that's why such an important communication tool should not be in the absolute control of one person. I hope the US Hawks will eventually evolve into a community controlled forum so that doesn't happen here.
You're absolutely right.
Oh, you have miraculously learned right from wrong. Was a burning bush involved in this miracle, Bob?
I'm at Funston for a few days...
I was wondering what that foul stench was. Mystery solved.
But one of the big problems I'll face is that I've been banned from both hanggliding.org and the Oz Forum.
And Kite Strings.
So it would be helpful if anyone who can post to those forums will let people know that I'm running and that they can ask me questions here on the US Hawks forum.
I'll get right on it.
I hope the US Hawks will eventually evolve into a community controlled forum so that doesn't happen here.
You've got Terry's blood on your hands Bob, I hope you rot in Hell.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Damn. You got in just in front of me. Oh well, pardon the redundancy...

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1093
2012 and 2013 USHPA Regional Director Elections
miguel - 2012/07/10 14:34:08 UTC

Don't sit back waiting for the votes to come to you. You have to go out and GET the vote.
Bob Kuczewski - 2012/07/11 18:26:07 UTC

You're absolutely right. I'm at Funston for a few days (which is out of Region 3), but I plan to do a lot of Region 3 flying so I can meet pilots and answer their questions this summer. Thanks!!

But one of the big problems I'll face is that I've been banned from both hanggliding.org and the Oz Forum.
That's terrible! So totally unfair!
So it would be helpful if anyone who can post to those forums will let people know that I'm running and that they can ask me questions here on the US Hawks forum.
And see a model of how a really good hang gliding organization and its elections SHOULD be run!
That won't be so hard on the Oz Report, but it might be tricky on hanggliding.org since Jack (sg) has threatened to ban anyone who mentions my name. So post at your own risk!!!
I won't ban anyone who mentions your name, Bob. In fact, there's a thread over here dedicated to you and your organization.
By the way, this shows how much Jack is controlling the sport of hang gliding through his forum. He's able to control regional elections by blacklisting candidates he doesn't like.
Again - so terribly unfair.
It's an ongoing problem, and that's why such an important communication tool should not be in the absolute control of one person. I hope the US Hawks will eventually evolve into a community controlled forum so that doesn't happen here.
Nah, NO WAY something like that's gonna happen there, Bob. I'm sure things well work out just fine just as soon as you've selected a community of people who toe whatever line you decide to draw and get the fatality rate down just a bit.
Sam Kellner - 2012/07/11 23:36:39 UTC

Miguel, Don't forget, BobK WON Reg3 Director once already.
Image Image Image
Looks like you got the negligent homicide demographic solidly in your pocket. Hard to see how you can lose with that kind of backing in this sport.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=119&
Truck towing accident in south Texas
Sam Kellner - 2010/10/21 00:43:39 UTC

Yep, so tragic. I surely hope all the details come out about this accident. That would cure any speculation, right.
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1081
Platform towing /risk mitigation / accident
Sam Kellner - 2012/07/03 02:25:58 UTC

No, you don't get an accident report.
I'm begging for a payout winch down here and getting no where. This guy (lawyer) comes up with 10min of airtime experience and a pocket full of $$$, gets a glider from one of the Reg11 instructors and gets a payout winch from somewhere or makes one Image too, Image Image Image and dies.

IMO this is the perfect example of why the Observer rating should exist.
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=881
Davis Straub; Idiot Statist, Endless Wars & Tyranny
Sam Kellner - 2011/12/21 14:05:56 UTC

Let's work together and make the US Hawks the best.
Also, so the Hawks forum continues to catch on, allowing us the platform to express our HG opinions.

Thanks BobK, Image
Sam
Southwest Texas Hang Gliding
US Hawks Chapter 4
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1081
Platform towing /risk mitigation / accident
Bill Cummings - 2012/07/18 05:45:32 UTC

Lets speculate then.
Oh, let's add a few rumors first.

- 2012/06/16, approximately 16:40 CDT.

- Terry James Mason
-- 1946/01/16-2012/06/16
-- Leakey, Texas
-- 140 pounds
-- 31982, Hang 3, 2011/07/22, Sam Kellner
-- Real County Airport, 49R, Runway 15, Leakey, Texas

- Terry's platform rig.

- Martin Doesn't-Believe-In-Hook-In-Checks Almost-Killed-In-Lockout-On-Sam's-Platform-Rig Apopot driving.

- Sam No-You-Don't-Get-An-Accident-Report Kellner riding on the back with his hand on the hydraulic pressure lever poised to make a good decision in the interest of the pilot's safety.

- Wind - SSE, straight down the runway, at around twelve, increasing substantially with altitude.

- Terry - as per his usual practice 'cause he was always more interested in experiencing the incomparable thrill of free flight than he was about getting the basics down on scooter tow to make the incomparable thrill of free flight less thrilling - oscillates his Sport 2 135.

- When Terry is at about 75 feet and maxing out one of his oscillations to the right, Sam makes a good decision in the interest of the pilot's safety...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=20597
Noobie
Sam Kellner - 2011/01/24 12:49:32 UTC

Blue Sky is among the best.
Wills Wing / Blue Sky / Steve Wendt / Ryan Voight Productions - 2007/03

NEVER CUT THE POWER...

Image

Reduce Gradually
Increase Gradually
...and Terry experiences the incomparable thrill of free flight...

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8143/7462005802_bbc0ac66ac_o.jpg
Image

...one last time for a couple seconds.

- Well, he's still connected on impact but the pressure's been dumped so what the hell.
As a thirty four and a half year, towing experience, pilot I know what a lockout is.

I often smirk when I hear of a center of mass lockout.
1. Yeah, Bill. Lockouts became things of the past when Donnell introduced the center of mass towing system concept - UNLESS:
- the pilot was stupid enough to stay on tow until contact with a downtube or nose wire was made by the pilot or bridle; AND
- a weak link in excess of one G - the combined weight of pilot and glider - was used.

2. There's no such thing as center of mass towing. All modern towing routes the tow tension to or a bit in front of the hang point.
Unless you have used a Moyes stainless steel towbar, towing from the base tube, you really have know concept of what a lockout REALLY is.
Bullshit. You can get overwhelmed my misaligned tow tension using any configuration you care to use, locked out, and killed just as dead as you could back in the old days. Sometimes even more dead because back in the old days nobody used releases which stank on ice.
That said, you can loose control while under tow, center of mass, for a host of reasons.
Including...
- the fact that a hang glider under tow is inherently roll unstable
- flying in thermal conditions
- having some total moron of an instructor teach you that there is a cone of safety
- not having learned how to fly your glider
- a tow operator who makes a good decision in the interest of your safety
- a standard aerotow weak link which will break before you can get into too much trouble
- a release within easy reach
- attempting to fly a glider with one hand during an emergency
- a new and improved Lookout Release not warranted as suitable for towing anything
- thinking that a pro will no longer have any use for the top third of his speed range
- having a fin stabilize you in a direction you'd rather not be flying
All of the reasons are more forgiving with center of mass towing.
How much more dead is Joel Lewis (1981/04/12) than Frank Sauber (1996/04/28)?
Rules of thumb like, while towing in a crosswind point your gliders nose at the tow vehicle, work with a constant wind vector throughout the ascension to release altitude.
Leave the glider alone and it will pretty much point itself where it should be.
If you pay attention you will see your towline with a slight "S" curve, look to it on days when you are towing through vector changes, with accompanying shears, that will require you to not have your nose pointed at the tow vehicle during a crosswind tow. I would guess that about better than 90% of the tow pilots have never thought past the, "Point you gliders nose at the tow vehicle while towing in a crosswind," --rule of thumb.

In that situation you will find yourself constantly dropping a wing to the same side until you simply have to pin off.

Why? --You are not towing in the "Sweet Spot."
Why? --because you don't yet know how to read the rope and put yourself in the, "Sweet Spot,"
Why? --Because you are pointed at the truck and not the relative wind while crabbing down the tow road to the downwind side of the tow vehicle.
And as you yourself have pretty much just told us, when issues like these become factors you're highly likely to be so high that we're no longer talking about safety issues.
You can only figure this out (being in the sweet spot) once you embrace the fact that the rule of thumb only works in an air steady state situation. (How many time will we find that happening while towing?)
Within the kill zone? Pretty much always.
And another thing, -- darn it!-- What is with all the Youtube video's of experienced tow people dashing out from under the glider and paying out rope until the tow vehicle has a fifteen degree angle on the tow line to the ground?

If you want to do that use a rope to the keel so it won't wallow and tip stall because of too much angle of attack. (AOA).
No thanks.
- It's a little better than one point aerotowing to start with.
- If you get popped up or rolled the tension is constant so you're a whole lot more likely to be able to keep things together.
- The situation keeps improving with tow angle.
- When you start getting to high tow angles the upper bridle leg starts becoming a royal pain.
Center of mass (to the pilot only) works best if you keep the pilot anywhere from about thirty five degrees to forty five degrees angle to the surface.
Yes. But zillions of people aerotow one point at zero degrees tow angle and only have serious problems when nobody looks at or has ribbons and - even then - on only extremely rare occasions.
The argument that you want to tow the pilot ahead and not down does not hold up especially if you have a low airtime tow pilot on the line. The trim feel will not be there. It will stall a tip easy with a low airtime pilot.
Fine. Then don't tow low airtime pilots using that technique.
Sure, a long time tow pilot can hold in on the base tube to keep it from stalling a tip...
ANYBODY can hold in on the basetube to keep it from stalling a tip - or anything else. You don't hafta be Chuck Freakin' Yeager to hold the bar back.
...while towing with a poor angle. But why?
Low AIN'T a poor tow angle. Zero is an EXCELLENT tow angle - all forward thrust and nothing aiding gravity to pull you back down. The steeper your tow angle the less efficient will be your climb.
Fly the correct angle on the towline and tow up at trim. Safety should win out over efficiency all the time.
Bullshit. Damn near everything in aviation is a tradeoff and there are issues of degrees.

- More efficient GLIDERS are damn near all more dangerous than the baggy stuff.

- If we want mile wide safety margins we shouldn't tow in soarable conditions.

- One more efficient tow with narrower safety margins that gets you to workable altitude is safer than towing twice with less efficiency and narrower safety margins to get the job done.

- If you're so fuckin' worried about safety margins then spend a couple hundred bucks to develop an electronically actuated release which blows the bridle off your hips with the push of a button.

- Having assholes like Sam and Bob stood up against walls and shot would also do wonders for safety in this sport.
It's late. More later on being in the sweet spot while towing.
The sweet spot ain't always that sweet. The air can do funny things to move it away very far very fast.
This post is only to point out how to avoid loss of control while towing and is not related to Terry's accident since I don't know what his control problem was.
1. It's not really related to ANY "accidents". It's mostly related to towing efficiency and tradeoffs.

2. Terry didn't have an ACCIDENT.

3. One of Terry's control problems was that he couldn't be bothered to learn to fly his glider in a safe environment.

4. But I'd be happy to bet fifty bucks that what actually pushed him over the edge was...
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"A bad flyer won't hurt a pin man but a bad pin man can kill a flyer." - Bill Bennett
...hooking up behind a bad pin man who couldn't be bothered to learn that...
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson
...the greatest dangers are rope breaks and premature releases.

And we had tons of evidence before 2012/06/16 and lots more evidence afterwards that Terry's pin man totally sucked and still does.
Zack C
Site Admin
Posts: 292
Joined: 2010/11/23 01:31:08 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Zack C »

I didn't follow Bill's post. What does tow line angle have to do with angle of attack?

Zack
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

According to Donnell's center of mass towing theory, which Bill references in his post four times, low tow angle tension applied to the pilot only will torque the glider/pilot system around the system's center of mass, located at a point on the suspension approximately one third of the way up from the pilot to the wing, and rotate the system such that it's standing on its tail.

The good news is that even if you do start off or end up towing from the pilot only (what Davis refers to as two point) you have a weak link of a one or lower G rating which will infallibly and automatically release the glider from tow whenever the towline tension exceeds the limit for safe operation.

And everybody knows that there's NO FREAKIN' WAY you can end up standing on your tail with a one G weak link. And even if you there's no freakin' way it'll hold very long before it fails and you find yourself free to fly back to launch for another tow.

Untold hundreds of thousands of smooth Koch two stage surface and one - sorry, two - point aero tows that seem to indicate that at low tow angles gliders DON'T wallow and tip stall because of too much angle of attack.

It's a no brainer that an absolute minimum of ten percent of all aerotows terminate in standard aerotow weak link failures, most of them low and in good soaring conditions, many of them precipitating crashes.

And it's blindingly obvious that:

- virtually all aerotowing crashes are precipitated by standard aerotow weak links; and

- any tow requiring emergency termination can be terminated by anyone with a release that...
Steve Kinsley - 1996/05/09 15:50

Personal opinion. While I don't know the circumstances of Frank's death and I am not an awesome tow type dude, I think tow releases, all of them, stink on ice. Reason: You need two hands to drive a hang glider. You 'specially need two hands if it starts to turn on tow. If you let go to release, the glider can almost instantly assume a radical attitude. We need a release that is held in the mouth. A clothespin. Open your mouth and you're off.
...doesn't stink on ice at least five times as fast as a standard aerotow weak link.

But hey, why adjust a perfectly good theory to try to bring it better in synch with reality?

Note...

- It just occurred to me that Donnell is the inventor of the stinks on ice release. They didn't exist prior to center of mass towing.

- Both recent Texas towing fatalities - Lemmy Lopez, 2010/10/13, and Terry Mason, 2012/06/16 - bought the farms not long after surface towing sessions with the author of the Skyting approach to safe towing.

- I haven't heard the author comment either on Terry's fatality or the stellar job Sam and Martin have done getting information out to the hang gliding public to up the odds of preventing a rerun.
Post Reply