landing

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Hey Christian...
Christian Thoreson - 2004/10

Thus wheel landings, the safest and easiest way to consistently land a hang glider...
If a wheel landing is the safest and easiest way to consistently land a hang glider what's the most dangerous and difficult way to land a hang glider with the most uncertain outcome?

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22176
Paragliding Collapses
Jim Rooney - 2011/06/12 13:57:58 UTC

Most common HG injury... spiral fracture of the humerus.
(Rhetorical question.)
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Here's another reason you should be constantly working on perfecting your standup landings...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Njj3jqiXH6U


You can be perfectly lined up for a wheel friendly Happy Acres putting green and suddenly - with no warning whatsoever - find yourself trying to get the glider stopped in a narrow dry ditch with large rocks strewn all over the place.

One thing in aviation that's a certainty:

In aviation there are no certainties.

P.S. Dude, didn't anybody ever tell you to let go of the downtubes just before impact?
Steve Davy
Posts: 1338
Joined: 2011/07/18 10:37:38 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Steve Davy »

The producer of that video goes by the name "Get high" on the Jack and Davis Shows. I believe he posted comments regarding that incident on Davis's sewer, but it could be this video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umTwIjF4XKc


...that he was commenting on.

I'll see if I can find the thread.
Steve Davy
Posts: 1338
Joined: 2011/07/18 10:37:38 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Steve Davy »

User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

His first name is Adam and he's involved in a dedicated Davis Show thread:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22898
Well, is this caused by switching hands late?

started by Christian Williams (and participated in by Ridgerodent).

- High percentage of the comments concerning when, where, how, how high, how much to go to the downtubes.

- No percentage of the comments questioning WHETHER to go to the downtubes - which is the action that precipitated the loss of control and crash into the rock strewn ditch.

Best post:
Richard Saffold - 2011/02/17 23:36:21 UTC

He is too low and slow for both LZs. The gradient there can be so strong that being upright and flying by the down tubes will only get you stalled and, as in this case, the pilot flare carries him over lip of the LZ with no flying speed left to correct for the being turned or get the nose up.

These are common mistakes for this LZ. If you were to watch all the seasoned locals land here, they would all be on the base tube until flaring.
Translation...

Do a wheel landing but...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27086
Steve Pearson on landings
Steve Pearson - 2012/03/28 23:26:05 UTC

I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.
...swap in a foot landing at the last possible moment.

http://vimeo.com/36062225


Pretty much the opposite of what Robert is saying here:
Robert Seckold - 2011/02/16 02:41:25 UTC

It just saddens me over the years seeing so many bad landings mainly because of trying to change hands at the last minute.
They're not having "bad landings" because of trying to change hands at the last minute, Robert. They're having "bad landings" because they're prioritizing stopping on their feet above all other considerations - particularly control/safety.

A couple of other good comments:
Andy Long - 2011/02/15 23:50:33 UTC

I think all hand transition timing arguments can't really be applied to Upper Parma. Priority #1 for landing there is getting the plateau under you first, no matter what it takes.
(List some sites at which the case is otherwise, Andy.)
Andy Long - 2011/02/18 16:01:27 UTC

But I have to tell you that your final approach into this benched LZ is very similar to the videos you see of pilots landing on aircraft carriers. It's very much a mind over matter type of thing. You have to force yourself to ignore the water, the nasty stern edge of the aircraft carrier, the churning wake and focus on that third wire.
Loose approaches / Long finals are STUPID.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

On the "ground pound" landing crash video - uploaded a bit over three months before the ditch dive...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umTwIjF4XKc
airjunkieadam - 2010/11/04

I hate posting this but hopefully it will also prevent someone from making the same mistake of a crappy approach.
Probably not but thanks anyway.
If I could do it over I would turn on final sooner and stuff the bar in. I'm also going to work on? starting my approach a little lower and fly my pattern tighter around the LZ with good speed. I think that would give unstable air less chance to affect my approach.
YES. So who was your instructor and how come he didn't have your thinking thus wired prior to signing you off for environments like this?
I foolishly flew my base leg longer than usual because it was so buoyant setting up to land (I almost? started to climb back out just before the video started).
If air is moving up there's some air moving down somewhere to fill the void - usually close by.
Just before my turn to final I was already pretty far out and low, then felt some sink which made things worse.
You were way the fuck out. It's damn near always a helluva lot easier to lose altitude over a field than it is to maintain it en route to one.
I barely had enough energy to clear the treeline, only to find one more tree in my way. I like one hand up, one hand down...
Yeah, that leaves you in a good position to be able to rotate to upright. Hard to understate the importance of stopping on your feet in a field like that - especially when you're so good that it would be just plain stupid to fly with wheels.
...but this time I barely had enough to squeak it in... er, pound it in.
Which you might not have done if you had given up on the field, pulled in to the extent that you just brushed the last treetop, and flared hard to stop on the slope.
Holding on both downtubes is how some people break an arm...
1. LOTS of people break arms and tear up shoulders in very friendly primary LZs after experiencing very minor problems.
2. Flying without wheels is another really excellent way to permanently fuck yourself up.
...and I was probably lucky I only broke my downtube.
Well I certainly am happy you learned your lesson cheaply on this one and will let go of the downtubes just before impact on your next crash.

P.S. Fix your spreader bar like it says in your owner's manual. Not much excuse for having it the way you do 'cause it's a little difficult to hook in without seeing it.
miguel
Posts: 289
Joined: 2011/05/27 16:21:08 UTC

Re: landing

Post by miguel »

How did you not post this one?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Xc5L5PFxGk


An exciting wheel landing at around 3:10.

Reality can suck when you do not land at the Heavenly Heights LZ.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

1. I didn't see a wheel landing at around 3:10. I saw a CRASH.

2. He IS landing at the Heavenly Heights LZ - and has managed to make reality suck anyway.

3. So what's your point? That somebody can fuck up a wheel landing on a reasonably good surface? Conventional aircraft have been proving that for well over a century - on much better surfaces than that one.

4. And of course he'd have been just fine trying to do the same landing on foot.

I can set you up with the best aerotow release system on the planet and if you launch into the wrong shit - even if you do everything else flawlessly - you can get killed just as dead just as fast as you would flying some Industry Standard crap you got from Quest or Lockout. But in the long run your odds of getting killed are gonna be down about 99 percent.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14230
pro tow set-up
Tad Eareckson - 2009/11/09 13:56:11 UTC
Christian Thoreson - 2005/10

With the advent of many aerotow parks around the country, people from many walks of life are learning to fly. People who previously could not fly hang gliders because of bad knees, bad hips, inability to use their legs, or other sorts of limiting physical problems that will not allow foot launching or landing, are now flying, and flying safely. Thus wheel landings, the safest and easiest way to consistently land a hang glider (yes, I know many people will have much discussion over that comment), are a viable option that allows pilots with physical disabilities to safely land their hang gliders.
Jack Axaopoulos - 2009/11/09 16:27:17 UTC

Although technically correct, its similar to saying:
"Driving 10mph, the safest and easiest way to consistently not lose control of your automobile"

Only problem is, who cares. I dont care to land my hang glider on a smooth grassy field of grass on the wheels every time, for the same reason I dont care to drive my car 10mph. Thats not why im in this sport or why I want to drive a car.

I think youre in the wrong sport if you have this attitude. Go take up knitting.

But notice.... Christian's comment is in the context of a disability. No issue with this. But if youre a fully able HG pilot, there is no reason to think you should only land on smooth grass on the wheels. Theres far more to this sport than that.
Yeah, Jack Asshole, flying hang glider dune skimming, three or four hours, up thousands of feet, a hundred miles, through aerobatics... and finishing the day with a sailplane style landing in a sane and safe field or strip...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2Gd2kcyOes

http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7094/13952342741_f71f343877_o.png
Image
Image
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7151/13952329131_03e535bc8b_o.png

...is like driving a car around ten miles an hour for half the day. It's just not worth it unless you spend the last five seconds...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26847
Landing Out
NMERider - 2012/08/10 17:09:10 UTC

Be glad you don't fly XC where I do. It really sucks here in the LA Basin and I'm tired of all the hazards.
...trying to stop in switchy air in a narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_57ROHkDog
Soaring Above Bedlam
04:38
LAGlide - 2012/10/20
dead

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27415
Friday the 19th with Hawks & Friends!
NMERider - 2012/10/24 21:47:05 UTC

I have to say that landing on the wheels is so much fun it's not funny.
But I'm really hoping you do all YOUR landings in environments which demand standup spot landings every time to keep you from breaking an arm, ripping a shoulder apart, or snapping your fuckin' neck. That way you can get to enjoy the adrenaline rush that allows you to truly enjoy the sport and I can get immense pleasure from reading about the one time you don't pull one off as well as you needed to.

Douchebag.
Steve Davy
Posts: 1338
Joined: 2011/07/18 10:37:38 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Steve Davy »

Top landing at Funston (on my Falcon) I go upright at about forty feet, pull in hard to punch though the gradient, then let/push out to arrest descent and slow to a stop.

The reason I don't stay prone into ground effect is the Falcon's poor penetration. In other words, if the gradient is shallow and strong I gotta get the nose up right now!

This works fine on a Falcon but I have a habit of doing the same thing on my Sport 2 and it doesn't work so well.
Post Reply