Oz forum
Which, unlike other organizations, really does honor the free speech of its members - just as long as the speech and the members meet with Emperor Bob's approval.Bob Kuczewski - 2015/05/29 18:34:18 UTC
Along those lines, this August 13th will mark 5 years of the US Hawks forum.
You've already established your Board of Directors. You cited it in your testimony to the u$hPa Kangaroo Court pretending to be deciding on 2015/04/22 whether or not to execute your expulsion as a model of fairness and openness - while forgetting to mention that your Board consisted of members all appointed by their Emperor and that it had ZERO power to do anything other than rubber stamp its Emperor’s decisions.I'd like to set a goal of incorporation and establishing our Board of Directors by that date.
That's OK, Bob. You've had plenty of experience in establishing your Board of Directors and neutralizing and expelling members not in sync with your positions.I've never incorporated anything before...
How 'bout THIS:...so I don't know how reasonable that is, but I like it as a goal.
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=1764
Review of Tad Eareckson's Ban from US Hawks
goal? We're now beyond the midpoint of your "some" number of months and confirming my expulsion was supposed to be a field test of your Fake Board of Directors before you trusted it with any degree of control. Surely you're not gonna leave the window extended those three or four days beyond it going live and leave ANY risk if it doing something you don't want it to - plus fail to run it through the field test as per your stated intent in mid February.Bob Kuczewski - 2015/02/17 04:06:03 UTC
US Hawks Board Members,
I had promised Tad that a review of his ban would be brought before the US Hawks Board of Directors as soon as the Board was formed. So I am posting this request as the first issue to be considered for discussion and decision by the Board.
I am posting this as a member of the US Hawks (and not as a Board Member), and it is my recommendation - as a member - that the Board make the decision to defer this discussion for some number of months (2 to 6) so that the Board can get used to operating as a Board before making a decision that may significantly change the experience of all of our users on the forum.
Thank you for your time.
Respectfully Submitted,
Bob Kuczewski
Member of the US Hawks
So here are your options, Bob. The Board:
- upholds your backstabbing of me. Then it's gotta write into the Bylaws the justification for the backstabbing. (Might wanna give Sam that assignment. Or, fuck, I'd be DELIGHTED to write something up in whatever direction you wanna point.)
- overturns your backstabbing. Then I've been sitting in prison for three and two thirds years without charges or even any law on the books I'm supposed to have broken.
- KEEPS DOING NOTHING - while I keep rotting in prison.
Whatever happens or doesn't happen *YOU* *ARE* *FUCKED*. You've already made what u$hPa did to you look like a blinding beacon of fairness, justice, principled action compared to what you've done and are doing to me - and, for that matter, Steve.
You're trying to build up a marble temple and you've already laid a foundation of total shit 'cause you decided that would be good enough at the time. And you now don't have any good options for going back, starting over, and doing things right.
Didn't think that was gonna bite ya, did ya? Too bad the blackmail effort didn't work out for ya. Check out how Dennis Hastert's doing now. (And let me be the first to say that I hope the "Individual A" punk gets nailed bigtime for this one.)Zack C - 2011/12/17 14:56:03 UTC
I don't know whether you were genuinely doing what you felt was the right thing to do or just looking for convenient justification to finally can Tad, but I believe your actions were inappropriate and set a terrible precedent for your organization.
