The Bob Show

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=42626
Ben Reese
Joe Faust - 2015/07/20 21:48:57 UTC

Simply, it is not true that "every forum" banned any particular person, except that person's own forum. The few forums that banned him put some historical shame on those forums and lowered the integrity of free-flight culture from such forums, I hold.
Not this one.
The forums would do well to cease the bans.
Just about all the forums would do well to ramp up bans. The problem is that just about all the forums are being run by the assholes most in need of banning.
It is easy to come up with scores or even hundreds of forums that have not banned him; just do your homework, Ben.
How many of those forums are worth bookmarking? Find something of redeemable social value or even just mildly interesting that's happened at CHGA since those fucking worms suspended me for three months on 2008/12/12 so they could better focus on sucking Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney's dick.
Follow the banning steps carefully and see the texts involved; look at the issues; the story is not short and certainly not deserving slanted rashness that comes from you or anyone.
Pay particular attention to the Homosexual-Relationship-With-A-12-Year-Old-Boy spam which preceded Bob's banning here and just how much popular support for it was expressed.
Try for an exercise: Make a list of the forums that have banned him AND a list of the forums on the Internet that have not banned him; that would be a start toward seeing the numbers involved. And note that the forums that banned him have seemingly single-persons with ownership-dictatorial say so over privately owned forums, not corporations.
You mean like US Hawks? Not much danger of Bob being restricted, sabotaged, banned over there.

Compare the levels of power sharing at The Bob Show and Kite Strings. I was never the Numero Uno over here and right now three other members are at my power level and nobody has responded to my offer of increased power - I'm guessing 'cause nobody else is seeing any problems that they need that kind of influence to address.
Being banned in an instance could be a confirmation that some issues are important;
Or that some are totally irrelevant to issues of aviation and very personal and none of anybody's goddam business.
...uncovering the issues of the owners the few forums could be enlightening.
Got that right. When you have nothing of any substance to stand on play the convicted paedophile / unrepentant child molester card to the hilt to enlighten everybody.

My banning of Bob here was undoubtedly an all time World Wide Web record for justification following an undoubted all time World Wide Web record for...
Rich Hass, President - 2015/04/18

ROBERT KUCZEWSKI EXPULSION HEARING INFORMATION

In a subsequent restraining order hearing initiated by Air California Adventures against Mr. Kuczewski, the judge watched Mr. Kuczewski's own video of the confrontation and commented that Mr. Kuczewski's behavior was "just totally unacceptable behavior". The judge encouraged Mr. Kuczewski to avoid similar confrontations in the future.
...tolerance. There wasn't one MURMUR from ANYONE - including you, Joe - that that action was in any way unwarranted and/or unnecessary.

Also note that subsequently:
- there's never been a punctuation mark that Bob's wanted here that I haven't posted - and addressed when something was called for
- I've unbanned Bob and restored full membership access on the condition that he doesn't post to the forum

And here's Bob's most recent direct communication to me:
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/11 18:16:54 UTC

I just wanted to offer a general thanks for all of the information that you capture and preserve on your site. I find it to be a helpful reference when all else fails.
Find a record of somebody else saying something like that to the person who cut his wire.

The Bob Show Fake Board of Directors:
- Joe Faust
- Sam Kellner
- Scott Wise
- Bill Cummings
- Bob Kuczewski
has twenty-three days left to try to figure out some way to legitimate Emperor Bob's summary banning of an unrepentant child molester and danger to people of varying ages before there's supposed to be some relaxing of dictatorial power. If you guys continue to be totally unable to handle a total no-brainer like that one I'm wondering just what you think you WILL be able to accomplish of any substance.

Go ahead. Put something on paper. Whatever it is I'm gonna be able to have an UNIMAGINABLE amount of fun with it. (And you know that, right Bob? Which is why you've left it buried down in an obscure subforum for over five months now hoping everyone will forget about it.)
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2014
To tow or not to tow - that is the question
Rick Masters - 2015/07/19 14:20:04 UTC

【閲覧注意】 ハングライダー 落下事故
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZmaXVyLdGc
remimasa03 - 2013/12/03
dead
To ramp launch or not to ramp launch - that is the question:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuSHh0nmKkQ


01-1203
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3873/14559992972_97b1a2a525_o.png
Image
07-1412
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3900/14557433291_0d22597fd6_o.png
Image
11-1513
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2926/14374222698_ed4d1c396d_o.png
Image
13-1525
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2935/14374386317_e0eb4f4087_o.png
Image
15-1620
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5590/14374149620_03c742c998_o.png
Image

Suck my dick, Rick.
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/19 15:12:08 UTC

Hook in failures...
1. Nobody has EVER been scratched as a consequence of a hook-in failure. THIS:

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=802
AL's Second flight at Packsaddle how it went
Rick Masters - 2011/10/19 22:47:17 UTC

At that moment, I would banish all concern about launching unhooked. I had taken care of it. It was done. It was out of my mind.
total bullshit is what gets motherfuckers killed. And each and every one of them DESERVES everything he gets. Lenami's friends had and have ZERO interest in getting the problem fixed and her family was interested only in more jail time for Jon Orders. Fuck 'em all.
...and release failures.
This was not a release failure any more than THIS:

http://ozreport.com/forum/files/having_a_bad_day_178.jpg
Image

was a glider failure. You can't have dickheads running tow and instructional operations, free flying at soaring sites, fucking up setups and skipping preflight procedures, handing their parachutes off to get repacked just prior to launch, and talk about "ACCIDENTS" and "EQUIPMENT FAILURES". When some asshole goes off a wet curve at eighty and slams into a telephone pole it wasn't because there was an inherent problem with the car.

And you, Bob, have been one of the major forces out there making sure these sortsa problems never get fixed. See my note to Rick above.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2014
To tow or not to tow - that is the question
Scott C. Wise - 2015/07/19 16:33:15 UTC

Of the 7 HG pilot fatalities (reported to the USHPA) over the last 31 months, beginning in Jan. 2013, 4 were directly connected with towing activities and 1 was closely associated with towing activities.

The 1 of those 7 that I might exclude is a Novice pilot who, after release, drifted too far downwind to make the usual LZ and hit power lines on his approach to his (poorly?) chosen secondary LZ.

But in that case, as a Novice pilot, had he foot launched from a hill, the designated LZ would/should have been clearly in sight. Other optional LZs could/should have pointed out to him - including their associated obstacles and hazards. Where he should NOT attempt a landing could also have been pointed out, described and explained.

Towing involves complications that multiply the possibilities of accidents - including the extreme/fatal type.

Subtracting tow related deaths, the sport of hang gliding (in the US, at least) has suffered only 2 Foot Launch fatalities over the last 31 months.
Of the 7 HG pilot fatalities...
You sure all of them were PILOTS? I could make a pretty good argument that most of them WEREN'T.
...(reported to the USHPA)...
How the fuck do you know how many were REPORTED to u$hPa? We know that Terry Mason was killed but good, Sam Kellner assures us that he reported the murder that evening, and u$hPa's never heard of him. You only know what u$hPa's reported and we can check all those names and dates against mainstream media reports. We know they're not reporting SOME fatalities and we're not entirely sure that there aren't some bicycle, motorcycle, tree climbing fatal accidents from the mainstream media that weren't actually hang gliding fatalities. Don't think for a nanosecond that if these Industry motherfuckers have an opportunity to keep something off the books they won't take it.
...over the last 31 months, beginning in Jan. 2013...
1. Why don't you name them so's everybody knows what everybody's talking about?
2. How 'bout we move it back to a bit over 37 months so's we can make it extra relevant to The Bob Show?
...4 were directly connected with towing activities and 1 was closely associated with towing activities.

The 1 of those 7 that I might exclude is a Novice pilot who, after release, drifted too far downwind to make the usual LZ and hit power lines on his approach to his (poorly?) chosen secondary LZ.
Oh good. *YOU* *MIGHT*. Towed to three thousand feet, worked some lift for a while, stopped maybe twenty minutes after terminating the tow and *YOU* *MIGHT* exclude it as some sort of towing related accident.
But in that case, as a Novice pilot, had he foot launched from a hill...
...a three thousand foot hill like Glacier Point...
...the designated LZ would/should have been clearly in sight.
And there's no fuckin' way anything bad can happen to a Novice pilot foot launching off a hill with the designated LZ...

32-1901
Image

...clearly in sight.
Other optional LZs could/should have pointed out to him - including their associated obstacles and hazards.
Like an old Frisbee...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21088
What you wish you'd known then?
Doug Doerfler - 2011/03/02 05:24:44 UTC

Nothing creates carnage like declaring a spot landing contest.
...lying in the middle of the runway.
Where he should NOT attempt a landing could also have been pointed out, described and explained.
The fact that he drifted downwind of the airport and hit a powerline on final is obvious proof that nobody discussed any of these sortsa issues with him.
Towing involves complications that multiply the possibilities of accidents - including the extreme/fatal type.
Obviously. That's why a tow flight is twelve times more likely than a free flight to result in an accident - including the extreme/fatal type.
Subtracting tow related deaths, the sport of hang gliding (in the US, at least) has suffered only 2 Foot Launch fatalities over the last 31 months.
What's this:

009-01013
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8648/16052644694_9630f01f06_o.png
Image

Scott? Tow or foot launch?

Here's your list of the seven hang glider pilots who've died as reported in the u$hPa PDFs I know you're using as your source:

2013/02/02 - Zack Marzec
2013/06/23 - Kevin O'Brien
2014/09/29 - Joe Julik
2015/02/27 - Kelly Harrison
2015/05/09 - Markus Schaedler
2015/05/17 - Scot Trueblood
2015/06/20 - Bertrand Delacroix
Fatality Reports
2013/02/02 - Zack Marzec

Zack Marzec (27), an H-4 Pilot with Aero Tow and Tandem Aero Tow proficiency as well as Advanced Instructor and Tandem Instructor appointments, and a USHPA member since 2009, suffered fatal injuries when when his glider tumbled during an aero tow launch. During the launch, at an altitude of 150 AGL, the pilot encountered an invisible bullet thermal which pitched the nose up, causing the weak link to break. Upon the breakage of the weak link, the glider whip stalled and then tumbled twice. The pilot and glider's leading edge hit the ground simultaneously. The pilot was utilizing his own pro-tow style tow harness, this own high performance glider with VG on, and was not wearing a full face helmet.
That wasn't tow related. We dealt with the crappy argument that being on tow is somehow safer than being off tow by putting him up on a really safe loop of special fishing line guaranteed to break before you can get into too much trouble. It worked - at a really safe altitude. All he had to do was set up an approach and give it another shot. But in the ensuing free flight he didn't control his wing adequately in the invisible bullet thermal he encountered.

Even then he'd have been OK if he'd been wearing a full face helmet. The glider came down in pretty good shape. It's not inconceivable that he could've replaced a leading edge section and gotten back up on the same kite within the hour.
2013/06/23 - Kevin O'Brien

Kevin O'Brien (60), a Novice (H2) pilot with Aero Tow, Platform Launch and 360 Turn proficiencies, and USHPA member since 2011, suffered fatal injuries in Texas when he hit power lines while attempting to land in an unfamiliar landing zone. The pilot had towed aloft and had drifted downwind and out of reach of his designated landing zone while looking for lift.
Yeah, that was tow related. Did that one already.
2014/09/29 - Joe Julik

Joseph Julik (57), an Intermediate (H3) pilot and USHPA member since 2001, suffered fatal injuries landing his Moyes Litespeed at Twin Oaks Airport in Whitewater WI.
Where's it say he towed up? But maybe he did. And no fuckin' way he could've suffered fatal injuries after going upright at a hundred feet at a mountain site like High Rock, in inland XC landing field like the stuff they've got around Millau, or a coastal site like Sand Dollar.
2013/03/27 - Kelly Harrison

Kelly Harrison (56), a Master (H5) pilot, tandem and advanced instructor and USHPA member since 1990, suffered fatal injuries during a tandem platform truck circuit tow at Jean Dry Lakebed near Las Vegas Nevada. His 11 year old student also perished in the accident.
Yeah, he was definitely on tow. That's the inherent danger involved with all that complicated Rube Goldberg equipment. We don't count Arys 'cause you've gotta be a person of a varying age over eighteen for u$hPa to recognize you as worthy of listing by name and figuring into the fatality totals.
2015/05/09 - Markus Schaedler

Markus Schaedler (59), an Advanced (H4) pilot and USHPA member since 2001, suffered fatal injuries during a flight from Kagel Mountain in Sylmar, CA. The circumstances surrounding the incident are currently still under investigation.
Tumbled in turbulence working thermal lift way back and up on a mountain slope. If he'd towed up at an airport an hour prior and had been working lift 2200 feet up he'd have been tumbled and killed much worse because of all that complicated equipment he'd used to get up an hour prior.
2015/05/17 - Scott Trueblood

Scott Trueblood (44), a Novice (H2) pilot and USHPA member since 2014, suffered fatal injuries during a flight in Ellenville, NY. The circumstances surrounding the incident are currently still under investigation.
Flew into a mountain. Probably not tow related. Spelled his first name with too many letters.
2015/06/20 - Bertrand Delacroix

Bertrand Delacroix (49), an Advanced (H4) pilot and USHPA member since 2004, suffered fatal injuries during a flight from Highland Aerosports flight park in Ridgely, MD. The circumstances surrounding the incident are currently still under investigation.
Spiraled into the ground across the road from the airport after towing up half a mile. Tow related because if they hadn't towed him up over that pancake flat peninsula he wouldn't have been able to spiral into the ground very hard.

And let's make sure we don't mention:
2015/06/26 - Trey Higgins
six days after the last so far posted who stalled back into the mountain scratching the slope at about launch elevation 'cause that one will be real hard to blame on the complexity involved in towing. We can totally ignore the complexity of having a mountain installed in what would otherwise be a couple cubic miles of air right next to free flight launch.

Go fuck yourself, Scott. We had ONE tow related death (two if you wanna count people of varying ages) and SIX free flight deaths (not counting Trey) that had total shit to do with towing.

Zack and Joe deliberately decertified their gliders such that they had no ability to get any airspeed when they most needed it at the two most dangerous phases of flight - takeoff and landing respectively.

It's also a fair bet that Kevin was upright and thus out a lot of ability to dive under the wires when they suddenly and unexpectedly materialized.

Something, that Ridgely has made sure we'll never hear about, went seriously wrong with Bertrand's glider - after the tow, 'cause there's no way to aerotow a seriously fucked up glider, and after all but the last hundred feet or so of the descent were over, 'cause there were witnesses and he'd have likely gone for his parachute if he'd had some time. It wasn't a medical event 'cause Ridgely and u$hPa would've been overjoyed and screaming it at the tops of their lungs.

Kelly Harrison was the most monumental clusterfuck in the history of the sport. Must've taken a couple of weeks of careful planning to make sure as many things as possible were gonna go wrong at once and be unfixable. Probably stitched his parachute container permanently closed to save himself the hassle of checking its security at the beginning of the day.

Bob lets you get away with / encourages shit like this 'cause he has no interest whatsoever in towing and it suits his political purposes to have it portrayed as inherently dangerous and keep it as dangerous as possible. Hell, if we keep killing people at the clip we do who's really to say that any one person's opinion is better than another's?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2014
To tow or not to tow - that is the question
Bill Cummings - 2015/07/20 16:57:35 UTC

In this...
...crappy low resolution rip-off of Lin's original...
...video I can hear the wind noise in the microphone steadily getting louder and increasing in (sound) pitch.

This is the strong circumstantial evidence indicated to me by the audio and together with the visual evidence much can be safely determined:
1) As the pilot topped out his airspeed was increasing. (Too much.)
When's he topped out, Bill? He attempts to blow his release at 12407. You think he's likely to do much climbing beyond that point with that tow angle?
2) The line tension was increasing. (Too much.)
The line tension was dumped immediately after idiot fucking Harold Johnson became aware that he was dealing with a jammed release - which was almost immediately 'cause even fucking idiots like Harold Johnson who do this a million times a year get pretty good feels as to what they're looking at.
3) The parasitic drag was increasing. (Understandably but this excess drag can help set you free from tow.)
Sure...

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8737/16790136379_c1c17b2f86_o.png
Image

Everybody knows that. Jammed release? Go upright - increase your parasitic drag. You'll be freed in no time.
4) Under these circumstances, the weak link should have broken.
Goddam fuckin' Tad-O-Link I'll bet.
It did not due to its strength. (Too much.)
Yeah! SEE! Toldyaso. Decreases the safety of the towing operation. Doesn't always break at the best possible time, when the glider's diving hard in a near impact situation.
5) The release failed.
The release didn't fail - asshole. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the release.
(In spite of multiple attempts...
If first you don't succeed keep doing the same thing over and over and hoping for better results. That's what Kelly was doing during the last few seconds of his life and he was a highly experienced Hang Five tandem instructor.
...and possibly due to too line tension.
Possibly due to three line tension.
...Too much.)
What's the right amount, Bill? What should his weak link be? 0.8 Gs OK? Let's say his flying weight is 260 pounds. 208 pounds. Round it down to 200. Lin would've been just fine with two hundred pounds of tension going from pulling him up to holding him level to nosing him straight back down into the Three Pinos.
Also the release cord could have tangled.
Aw fuck. It's a mechanical thing, Bill. Mechanical things fail. There's nothing you can do to change that so why worry what the specific problem is? Or bother coming out from under Bob's Rock once in a while and getting some kind of clue as to what's actually been going on in the REAL world?
6) With increased line tension the sweet spot (left and right, short of lock out.) narrows.
Yeah Bill, ya sure wouldn't wanna get locked out when you've already got a towline pulling straight back and nosing you down into a vertical dive. That could almost instantly put you into a shitload of REAL trouble.
7) Steering with one hand with the pilots attention focused on the failed release, very likely, started the lock out to the left.
Nah...
Jerry Forburger - 1990/10

High line tensions reduce the pilot's ability to control the glider and we all know that the killer "lockout" is caused by high towline tension.
It was the high towline tension allowed by the Tad-O-Link. We all know that.
Note: Static Pro towing with single surface glider, with too strong of a weaklink, (and no climb restricting "V" bridle attached to the keel) can render a parachute save ineffectual when things go wrong at the start of tow.
This is just too dumbfoundingly moronic to even start commenting on.

No, can't help myself...

- It's not STATIC - it's a stationary winch.

- One point surface towing isn't "Pro" towing.

- He's a fucking Hang Two STUDENT. He's SUPPOSED to be on a single surface glider.

- It's moronic to use a keel attachment unless you're gonna stay at shallow tow angles.

- Show me the part of the video in which Lin was in need of extra climb restriction. All I was really seeing was a problem with dive restriction. That issue was resolved pretty satisfactorily when he got the chute out and open.

- And with the towline pulling aft and the nose pointed down wouldn't a climb restricting "V" bridle become a dive enhancing "V" bridle?

- Show me a photo of a bridle that forms some other letter of the alphabet - a "B" would be cool if you can manage it.

- Tell me what weak link he SHOULD have been using and the point at which it would've worked.

- Also tell me what weak link he WAS using and why you think Pat Denevan and Harold Johnson allowed themselves to be talked into using Tad-O-Links.

- Tell me how a parachute SAVE can be rendered ineffectual? You wanted the guy dead but the parachute worked and fucked up the flight plan?

- Show me a video parachute save at the start of a tow - one at which the tow's being started below two hundred feet.

- Got any good videos of parachute saves when things are going RIGHT at the starts of tows?

- The entire flight plan tow went flawlessly. No problems whatsoever with the start. It was only after what was supposed to have been the end of the tow that things stated getting ugly - idiot.

I don't particularly want you here, Bill.

- This video was fuckin' viral, it got the crap discussed out of it on the Jack and Davis Shows and here and this is the first you've heard of it. What was it upon which you were focusing your attention that was so much more important than this one?

- I get fuckin' sick and tired of listening to assholes like you, Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney, Kinsley Sykes, Mike Bomstad, Dennis Pagen diagnose every problem a glider can have on tow as being the consequence of much too strong a weak link. In this case we know that the winch was immediately freewheeled when things started going pear-shaped and all Lin was dealing with was a little latent internal, drag, weight resistance that wouldn't have been enough to get him off the ground at the beginning of the tow but was still way more than an appropriate weak link with a finished length of 1.5 inches or less would've allowed.

You're in idiot heaven over there on The Bob Show. Stay there. Knock yourself out.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2014
To tow or not to tow - that is the question
Brian Scharp - 2015/07/21 00:34:20 UTC
2013/06/15 - Tres Pinos - jammed release
http://www.kitestrings.org/topic81.html
Tad Eareckson - 2015/03/02 16:00:00 UTC
...
Wow Brian. That's a copy of the entire archive in one post. That was a lotta bandwidth even for here and even spread out over ten posts.
Not for most of those assholes to participate in.
Frank Colver - 2015/07/21 03:16:40 UTC

Please forgive what is probably a stupid question.
I'm pretty sure you'll get unlimited forgiveness by that crowd for stupid questions.
I have never been towed in a hang glider...
Beats the crap outta being towed...

http://ozreport.com/forum/files/copy_2_of_imgp1239_197.jpg
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7220/13949046702_ccfa0fafab_o.png
Image
http://www.thekiteboarder.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/opener-532x800.jpg

...not in a hang glider.
...and don't intend to be towed...
Course not. Way too complicated and dangerous. Just look what just happened to Zack Marzec, Kevin O'Brien, Joe Julik, Kelly Harrison, and Bertrand Delacroix. Chris Muller and Paul Vernon didn't exactly come out smelling like roses neither.
...so maybe I'm missing something obvious.
Well duh. You've never been towed in a hang glider and never intend to be towed. So how could you possibly understand any obvious stuff?
Why didn't the tow operator release the line at his end when he saw that it wasn't being released at the glider end? Image Image
Why don't you use the links in Brian's post and check out the source material instead of asking for stupid questions to be answered by other Bob Show total morons? Image Image
Yeah, he was too lazy and stupid to check them out when you handed them to him at the beginning of your last post - and, for that matter, two years ago when this stuff was buzzing all over the web - but now...
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/21 05:47:35 UTC

For the record, I've gotten the following private message about Brian's reposting from Tad Eareckson's site:
Allow only the link or you are asking for trouble.
Brian should be allowed to discuss this all he wants in his own words.
And nothing is preventing him or others from posting on TE's site.
But don't bring his site over here or you will run off some people.
Rick Masters.

Hey Bob, that's really cool the way you have your little rule you pulled out of your ass about needing to reveal your actual identity when you attack other members and then get around it by posting anonymous attacks on other members sent to you via personal message.

No, wait. You decided Tad wouldn't be a member any more back at the end of 2011. And besides, that rule never applied to the cowardly anonymous Bob Show motherfuckers attacking Tad while he was on and having his free speech really honored. Carry on.
I suspect the private message is correct.
Me too. Cowardly anonymous backstabbers operating out of public view are almost always correct about everything. And besides, who can forget the huge surges in participation The Bob Show enjoyed when Bob experimented on Tad by locking him down in his Basement and shortly thereafter banning him to make The Bob Show a safe place for people of varying ages to visit?

And if the private message IS, in fact, correct, the some people who will be run off by free speech exercise of posting quotes of Tad's material are EXACTLY the kind of people who are gonna be most valuable in helping you build your new hang gliding association - Scott C. Wise and Peter Birren, for example.

And obviously/logically the kinds of people Tad is gonna ATTRACT to The Bob Show, like the ones he brought over in 2011, are definitely NOT the kinds of people you want helping you build and being members of your new hang gliding association.
However, this should be a matter for the Board to consider and debate.
1. You sure they'll be able to fit it in to their already tightly packed agenda? They still haven't been able to find the time to rubber-stamp Emperor Bob's wise decision to eliminate the unrepentant child molester to make The Bob Show a safe place for people of varying ages to visit.

2. Well ya gotta admit, Bob, that you went a bit nuts with THIS:

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/faq.php
Frequently Asked Questions
What will keep the US Hawks from becoming another USHPA or HGAA?
You will ... hopefully. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Everyone has to do their part once in a while. If you see something that's not being done correctly, then it's your duty to speak out. One big difference between the US Hawks and other organizations is that the US Hawks really does honor the free speech of its members.
honoring of free speech of members thing. EVERYBODY agrees that there need to be reasonable limits - can't have people like Jim Gaar and Peter Birren being called motherfuckers, for example. So just put something in the SOPs to clarify the actual intent and policy. This template:

http://www.hanggliding.org/wiki/HG_ORG_Mission_Statement
HangGliding.Org Rules and Policies
No posts or links about Bob K, Scott C Wise, Tad Eareckson and related people, or their material. ALL SUCH POSTS WILL BE IMMEDIATELY DELETED. These people are poison to this sport and are permanently banned from this site in every possible way imaginable.
work pretty good for ya? Explain to me how that's not EXACTLY the policy you're considering implementing.
I'm not sure where I would stand in that debate.
I am. You'll stand wherever you think will best serve to get Emperor Bob what Emperor Bob wants. And fuck any pretense of rules, principles, respect for individual rights and freedoms.

Myself on the other hand... I don't have much trouble figuring out where I'm gonna be standing on any debates relevant to this sport and its conduct. Just about everything is pretty fuckin' simple and black and white. Even with you. You've got two distinct modes that look like they're selected with a toggle switch:
- principled - like when you're going after Gliderport/u$hPa sleaze, abuse, corruption
- sleaze - like when you're feigning giving a rat's ass about the safety of people of varying ages and going after Tad, Robin, Max

Brain dead easy calls.
As time passes, I've been considering the roles of forums and speech in hang gliding.
1. Fix the sentence, Bob. Needs to start off "As time HAS PASSED..." Twenty-two days shy of five years now that you've been running your dictatorship posing as a democratic Utopia. Half a decade in which not one of your most trusted cocksuckers has been entrusted with a dust particle's worth of control. Not one Fake Board of Directors member has even had the opportunity to cast a Fake vote to rubber-stamp your decision to silence the unrepentant child molester. Out here in the actual democracy people cast votes that actually count to do whatever insane, unconstitutional, vicious, draconian bullshit they feel like to unrepentant child molesters. (I really get a kick out of it when their own kids get bitten in the ass by all the unintended consequences.)

2. We know EXACTLY how you've considered the roles of forums and speech in hang gliding. We've watched what you've actually been doing and compared to what you've been saying.
It's clear that being banned from a relatively small site (like Tad's forum or even the US Hawks) does not do much damage to the person being banned.
Well yeah, it's really clear to you so therefore it's really clear to everyone else - seeing as how Emperor Bob's vote is the only one that ever counts for anything.

Fuck you, Bob. You don't tell me I'm not good enough to participate alongside scum like Sam Kellner, Charlie Schneider, Peter Birren and total fucking assholes like Scott C. Wise and Rick Masters and then issue edicts about how much damage vile assaults on First Amendment freedoms don't do.

If you'd actually stood behind any of the values you perpetually lie your ass off about having that alternate association would've represented a theoretical hope for me to resume the flying career cowardly shits just like - and, in fact, INCLUDING - you turned to toast at the beginning of the 2009 season.

Furthermore... Being banned from or admitted to Kite Strings is a huge fucking deal 'cause it's the most lethal forum on the planet - the only one in which integrity is valued and mandated. Two plus two is always equal to four and anybody with and/or respecting another opinion on the issue either doesn't get in or is gone immediately after expressing that opinion anywhere. It was made crystal clear in the first post here - Zack's, not mine - that Kite Strings does NOT really honor the free speech of any asshole capable of entering a username and password.
But being banned from a major site (like hanggliding.org)...
The Jack and Davis shows are corrupt lunatic colonies and mutual masturbation societies. Being banned from them can almost always be regarded as badges of integrity. One always hears the admonition to not feed the troll when a two-plus-two-equals-fourer starts doing significant damage. The Jack and Davis Shows are in fact themselves megatrolls. Those motherfuckers did me favors by banning me. Now all my posts translate to hits for Kite Strings and I still get referenced on the intellectually castrated troll colonies.
...or from one's ability to fly (like USHPA) is a much greater injustice due to the virtual monopolies that they each hold.
See my note above - asshole.
It doesn't bother me one bit that Tad banned me...
Course not. Your participation here was limited to sabotage and posting Homosexual-Relationship-With-A-12-Year-Old-Boy spam. You've still got The Bob Show and Grebloville where you can do that.
...and I could easily live the rest of my life without posting there.
And fuck, what would you have...

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=881
Davis Straub; Idiot Statist, Endless Wars & Tyranny
Warren Narron - 2015/02/08 00:52:29 UTC

The Hawks has no product. There is no there, there.
...to contribute anyway?
I hope he feels the same about the US Hawks.
Yeah Bob, I have ZERO desire to further dignify your dump with my credibility. But don't make the mistake of thinking for a nanosecond that I've stopped seething with anger over the despicable sleazy treatment I got from you while I was there and have continued to get while I haven't been.
Both of us are working for causes that we believe in, and that's as it should be.
One of us is - EFFECTIVELY. You're such a scheming pathological liar and are so unwrapped that you have no ability to really know what you believe in. And you've engineered your project such that it has ZERO possibility of becoming what you claim to believe in.
It's a complete waste of time for either of us to be sniping at each other, and it's counter productive to our stated goals.
Waste of your time. My stated goal...
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/11 18:16:54 UTC

I just wanted to offer a general thanks for all of the information that you capture and preserve on your site. I find it to be a helpful reference when all else fails.
...is a living, breathing, effective reality in progress. And while we're on the subject - name another forum at which you've been dealt with entirely fairly in your conflicts with Torrey and u$hPa.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41619
Goodbye Bob K?
Andrew Vanis - 2015/04/19 00:25:35 UTC

Just how are we supposed to talk with other interested USHPA members?
Swift - 2015/04/19 03:38:46 UTC

Anonymously at?
http://www.kitestrings.org/topic33-580.html
Tad doesn't care. The letter's posted there.
I am hopeful that Brian's motivation for posting was positive, and I'll look at it from that perspective.
Why should you give a flying fuck about Brian's motivation? He posted a copy of an incident archive with very little in the way of editorializing from T** at K*** S******.
The US Hawks is much like the early United States.
No it's not. The early United States were NEVER dictatorships.
Many of the people who've found there way to this site have had their fill of "kingdoms" from the "old world".
1. You only spelled "their" right once.
2. So they came to something even worse.
Indeed, many of us have been banned from those "old world" sites because we refused to bow to the powers that controlled them.
You mean the way T** at K*** S****** was when he refused to bow to the power - singular - that controlled The Bob Show? No, wait. That was to make The Bob Show a safe place for people of varying ages to visit. (Not withstanding the plug for Bill Cosby as a national hero for trying to save so many wasted lives.)
And it's fair to say that just as with the early settlers of the US, many of us are staunch individualists and are not often willing to yield our personal sovereignty to others.
Bullshit. Humans are some of the most social and socially dependent animals on the planet. Aviation exploded at the beginning of the previous century 'cause Wilbur and Orville figured out what two plus two equals and there were no other opinions on the issue amongst the people who started putting actual planes into the actual air. Today we have free flight hang glider designs all over the planet and there's not a dime's worth of difference between any of them within the various performance classes.
As with the early US, this makes us a very strong group of people ...
Fuckin' train wreck in constant progress.
...if we can figure out how to work together.
I suggest we endorse Bob's wise decision to exclude staunch individualist unrepentant child molesters and write some SOPs to make the policy official. Who's with me? I mean besides all the closet child molesters rushing to act in efforts to minimize suspicions regarding their own identities and skeletons? That goes without saying.
I often see my job as trying to do the best I can to bring together the talented and individualistic people who will build a great new hang gliding organization.
Fuckin' awesome job you're doing there, Bob. Keep bringing them together and getting them on the right page and one of these years you might be able to trust one or two of them to vote for something you've determined that they want - like Bob for lifetime President, Speaker of the House, and Chief and Only Justice of the Supreme Court. Shouldn't be much of a problem with all those talented and individualistic assholes you have assembled over there - particularly the ones who see Emperor Bob as the only person talented and individualistic enough to lead them out of their desert.
In that regard, I consider it as my own failure that I was not able to harness Tad's energies to improve the sport of hang gliding here within the US Hawks.
What the hell, Bob. You've succeeded in ways you can't even imagine harnessing Tad's energies to improve the sport of hang gliding - just not there in the US Hawks. Dr. Trisa Tilletti, Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney, Davis Dead-On Straub, Jack Axaopoulos have been important motivators as well.
I hope I can do better with some of our other detractors.
Oh please don't give up on me, Bob! I could really surprise you. Ya never really know fer sure. And if you succeed at any level with me just think what you'll be able to accomplish with a typical u$hPa Board member.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2014
To tow or not to tow - that is the question
Joe Faust - 2015/07/21 15:33:48 UTC

1. The link to Tad's identical long run of clips would have been sufficient.
Maybe.
2. Then hereon, new discussion on that linked matter would be neat.
If those Bob Show assholes gave a flying fuck about this sorta thing they'd have had the discussion two years ago when everybody else on the hang gliding planet was discussing the crap out of it. (Thanks to the efforts of Steve Kite Strings scooped the hell out of everyone on this one.)
3. Consider respect for Tad's work at his forum for the topic.
Why start now?
That work could be respected by the simple link followed with discussion here.
4. Duplicating such long work could be seen as a waste of Internet and forum bandwidth and resources.
5. Tad's work has some kind of copyright about it, not sure of details.
What's your source on that?
He might even have a legal means to force deletion of the duplicated work.
Why would I want my efforts - from which I receive ZERO monetary reward - to have LESS exposure? 'Specially when the source is properly credited?
But respecting such labor-intensive work by Tad to make the stills from the video seems like a fraternal way of proceeding.
So would conducting an organization in accordance with stated principles and actual rules.
6. There is no need fundamentally to bring all of Tad's site by duplication here. Links with added value discussion would be easy. Linking takes a click.
7. Brian, would you consider posting just the link and then post again any added discussion that you bring to the matter. Many of us easily visit Tad's site and look for the definite positive values that are woven there along with his rough words.
They're interrelated.
Brian, then would you consider letting the USHawks moderator delete the heavy bandwidth duplication post leaving just the link to the topic at Tad's site?
What? You've got a moderator over there? I thought you just had somebody to make sure that the US Hawks really did honor the free speech of its members who weren't unrepentant child molesters.
Brian Scharp - 2015/07/21 16:59:28 UTC
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/21 05:47:35 UTC

I am hopeful that Brian's motivation for posting was positive, and I'll look at it from that perspective.
It was and thanks. In the original post the linked video was poor quality and in a foreign language. Lin's vimeo link is a higher quality and is accompanied with his own description and discussion with others. The images of the wrongly rigged release might help prevent a repeat.
They didn't prevent Kelly Harrison from doing a repeat at Jean Lake on the afternoon of 2013/03/27.
At the very least it shows what caused the problem.
And it's our job to make sure that Mission Soaring Center students and Las Vegas Hang Gliding thrill ride operators get this right - 'cause whatever it is that u$hPa and the excellent book, Towing Aloft, by Dennis Pagen and Bill Bryden were doing just wasn't cutting it.
Joe Faust - 2015/07/21 15:33:48 UTC

Brian, then would you consider letting the USHawks moderator delete the heavy bandwidth duplication post leaving just the link to the topic at Tad's site?
OK, but how about leaving the images of the release?
Bob's not gonna do anything. He's obsessive/compulsive about the purity of the historical record. He'd rather have a huge gaping hole at:

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1802&start=40#p11153

for all eternity rather than make an edit to replace an obsolete image address with the one for the higher quality replacement.
Rick Masters - 2015/07/21 17:11:15 UTC

One frame I hadn't noticed (perhaps I was holding my nose)...
Yeah, I was holding my nose too. This hang glider towing thing totally sucks. Do you realize that one hundred percent of the fatalities and serious injuries in Florida are the consequences of tow launched flights? And Wills Wing tells ya right there in there owners' manuals that their gliders have not been designed to be motorized, tethered, or towed. What are people thinking when they have a perfectly good launch ramp right there at the far corner of the next state up? :roll:
...was post-impact.
There was no IMPACT - asshole. Lin got his chute out - 'cause he was a Hang Two student and not a highly experienced Hang Five tandem instructor focused on trying to pry is idiot-proof two string open, and he and his Falcon 4 were both back in the air a couple weekends later.
Those power lines are even closer than they appear in the wide-angle lens.
Would that have been Frame 203-23218? The one captioned:
Tad Eareckson - 2015/03/04 01:42:06 UTC

Check out the powerlines. (Caution: Objects in the wide angle lens are closer than they appear.)
?
He almost hit them.
No fuckin' way he'd have almost hit the powerlines coming down under silk after a free flight launch.
Like Frank, I've never towed. There are too many complications that can quickly add up into an accident.
Yeah, if you want a real expert on the hazards of towing there's nothing like going to some douchebag who's never towed. Reminds me of the way Emperor Bob Kuczewski is the world's foremost expert on that dangers and fundamental uselessness of the flavors of the hook-in checks he's never done.
For me, hang gliding is about running off the earth into the sky.
And we all wanna be just like you, Rick. If the first five seconds of a flight aren't dedicated to balancing a glider on one's shoulders, waddling off a ramp, proning out and starting to fly then the next four hours, five thousand foot gains, two hundred miles are worth total shit.
I don't need help.
Fuck no! You drive out to the Owens Valley, pump your own gas en route, switchback up to Walt's Point, tell the wire crew to fuck off, do a preflight check of your suspension so that's taken care of, done and concerns of launching unhooked are out of your mind, climb up to fifteen thousand feet where you switch on the oxygen that you hand pumped into your bottle the night before, fly a hundred and fifty miles downwind, pack up your glider and throw it on your shoulder, and walk back to your truck at launch. Maybe take an evening glass-off flight if it's coming in OK.

Fuck those faggots who tow up at airports to get started. Fuck Chuck Yeager who had to have is X-1 taken up by a B-29 that somebody else was flying before he could launch and break the sound barrier. Goddam faggot.

So what's it been since the last time you actually flew a hang glider, Rick? Close to thirty years now? Too many paragliders collapsing all over your sky to make anything really doable?
Towing is advantageous to two groups: pilots without hills and instructors without patience.
Yes, people of varying ages, do make sure you pay attention to this expert on why towing totally sucks in every way imaginable. We need to get a list of all the things Rick doesn't do so we can better and more efficiently emulate him by not doing any of them ourselves.
I would be very happy if the U.S. Hawks left towing under the auspices of the USHPA - along with tandem instruction (real or imagined).
Well let's do everything we can to make Rick very happy then, Bob...

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1701
Complaints about Tad
Rick Masters - 2015/01/16 18:59:15 UTC

He has concerns about people trying to muck up the forum, but he has also dealt effectively with Tad.
You're just bound to pick up a lot more support for the Bob Show by taking all the US flatlands, scooter trainees, comp pilots out of the equation. (Although, yeah, fuck tandem and everybody associated with it.)

Since my earliest days in the sport thirty-five years ago - shortly before there even was such a thing as safe hang glider towing - I've INSTINCTIVELY personally disliked anti-tow people. And now I feel very confident and comfortable saying that ALL anti-tow people are assholes - stupid non pilot jocks who have no place in the sport I want to have. Same sorta deal with stupid shit Aussie Methodists. Knowing just that much about somebody tells you everything you really need to know.

Towing in hang gliding has always been characterized as a necessary evil to get a glider started when there's no mountain available. The truth of the matter is that a mountain is a necessary evil to get a glider started when there's no tow operation available. And we see that take affirmed when we've got a Lookout Mountain type environment with gliders electing to go up behind Dragonflies from the valley instead of driving up to and setting up at the ramp. The more we do this the more we start looking and acting like the sailplanes we actually are.

Rick Masters is a first class dickhead with extremely little in the way of redeeming social value. Way south of what's needed to justify his existence.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2014
To tow or not to tow - that is the question
Bill Cummings - 2015/07/21 18:13:46 UTC

There is more than a routing problem here. Can you spot it? (I'll answer later.)
Image
I got it, Bill. Way too strong of a weak link. Wrong color, too. The green ones always work the best.
Sam Kellner - 2015/07/21 21:25:10 UTC

Hi Bill,

That release looks to be sewn by a beginner Image Image
Yeah, looks like it could come apart at any moment. Maybe seriously inconvenience someone. Image Image
The shortest loop should be pulled through the eyelet.
No foolin' you, Sam. (That's what Bill meant when he referenced the routing problem.)
Also there's no pocket to cover the end of the release pin.
What? You used your special x-ray vision to determine that?
The release line can get wrapped under the pin and no matter how hard you pull............... Image Image
Keep up the great work on surface towing at Leakey, Sam. Years of operation, not so much as a skinned knee reported by u$hPa.
Bill Cummings - 2015/07/22 04:11:00 UTC

Hi Sam,
I've got a sewing machine here in the Good Will pile by the front door that wouldn't out do that sewing job in the picture.
And what the fuck. Ya just gotta make the release stronger than the weak link and you're using a weak link that will break under freewheel tension. Let's not go nuts here.
Yes it was a misrouting of the three string release that caused the failure to release.
No, it was the negligence of Mission Soaring Center in not having a procedure for preflighting Hang Two students before they're hauled up.
I haven’t yet run across the picture showing the missing pin, end, pocket, only the one side like I have pictured.
You don't have Sam's special x-ray vision. Image Image
The answer to my question is that the last biggest string of the three string release is through a loop that should be even a bigger diameter string/loop.
And that's obviously the loop he was connecting to on the day of the incident - not something he just pulled out of a drawer to help him illustrate the mistake he made on the connection sequencing.
Releasing a bigger cord than the last string of the release will further reduce the chance of a capture upon release.
1. I haven't heard that they're having that problem there.
2. Some reason they shouldn't be connecting to a tow ring?
This is actually why each string of the three string release has different ascending cord diameters as it gets closer to the cord to be released.
Some reason they shouldn't be connecting to a tow ring?
Image
Actually looks to me like it IS a larger diameter. Probably the same though. I played with it in Photoshop and got the same number of pixels. Not that big of a fuckin' deal in any case.

So is that it, Bill? We don't get to hear any more about the appropriate weak link with a finished length of 1.5 inches or less that he SHOULD'VE been flying? Nothing about the twat at the other end of the string who had no means of further reducing all that deadly lockout tension?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2014
To tow or not to tow - that is the question
Rick Masters - 2015/07/23 02:22:45 UTC

Towing accidents in my global database (very incomplete), last 5 years
Also very inaccurate, misleading, dishonest, useless.

I've reformatted your little pile o' crap into something sane and readable - including reversing the order:

2010/07/22 - H - dead
2010/08/07 - P - dead
2010/10/15 - H - dead
2011/01/15 - H - major injuries
2011/02/26 - P - dead
2011/04/03 - P - broken back
2011/06/22 - P - broken back
2011/07/10 - P - dead
2011/09/13 - P - broken back
2011/09/24 - P - broken back, pelvis
2011/10/29 - H - dead
2012/03/03 - H - dead
2012/06/16 - H - dead
2013/02/02 - H - dead
2013/06/30 - H - head injuries
2013/07/13 - H - dead
2013/07/21 - H - tandem - dead pilot
2013/07/21 - P - dead
2013/07/24 - H - dead
2013/11/16 - P - multiple fractures
2014/01/09 - P - dead
2014/06/27 - P - dead
2014/09/23 - H - head injuries
2014/10/03 - H - dead
2014/11/10 - H - broken back
2015/03/27 - H - tandem - dead pilot
2015/03/27 - H - tandem - dead passenger
2015/06/06 - P - broken back
2015/06/08 - P - dead

Paragliders...

- Must foot launch. (No dolly or platform.)

- ALL releases stink on ice. There's one that's foot operable but you need to use your feet to get off the ground and that's the most critical period of the operation.

- EXTREMELY vulnerable to Infallible Weak Links - the lower your lift to drag ratio the less coping margin you have.

Let's toss 'em out now and just look at the hang glider incidents...
---
2010/07/22 - dead

Anybody know what this is? The best I can do is 2010/06/26 - John Seward. Flew back into the slope from the Packsaddle launch.
---
2010/10/15 - dead

Date's wrong. 2010/10/13 - Lemuel Lopez. Frustrated Donnell student who struck out on his own and killed himself on his first effort.

http://ozreport.com/14.204
Truck towing accident in south Texas
Donnell Hewett - 2010/10/19

The pilot apparently tried to release without success by cutting his weak link with a pocket knife.
Big surprise.
---
2011/01/15 - major injuries

So major that he was killed instantly. Shane Smith. Took off the tow ring and ran his bridle through the focal point of his safe towing system.
---
2011/10/29 - dead

Date's wrong. 2011/10/28 - Lois Preston. Person of a varying age on an oversized glider on her second attempt at a successful hang glider solo. Aerotow. Oscillated on her first effort, locked out on her second. Release was within easy reach and her BHPA weak link didn't work when it was supposed to.
---
2012/03/03 - dead

Anybody?
---
2012/06/16 - dead

Terry Mason. Sam made a good decision in the interest of his safety and sent the report to u$hPa's Director of Shredding.
---
2013/02/02 - dead

Zack Marzec. Pro toad. Weak link increased the safety of the towing operation when the glider was climbing hard in a near stall situation.
---
2013/06/30 - head injuries

Anybody?
---
2013/07/13 - dead

Anybody?
---
2013/07/21 - tandem - dead pilot

Luis Rizo. Aero. Tug outclimbed him. Sara Reynaud got fucked up pretty seriously too. Never an update on her recovery. (If much of any.)
---
2013/07/24 - dead

Date's wrong. 2013/06/23 - Kevin O'Brien. Hit powerlines on final after drifting downwind of the airport. Total shit to do with towing.
---
2014/09/23 - head injuries

Steven Tinoson. Student - "in his 30s". Lockout shortly after takeoff behind a Dragonfly at Forbes. Total coverup. Release was undoubtedly within easy reach and his HGFA weak link didn't work when it was supposed to.
---
2014/10/03 - dead

Date's wrong. 2014/09/29 - Joe Julik. Went upright at a hundred feet in gusty air so he'd be ready to flare his new topless to a safe stop in the narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place at Whitewater. Got hit by an invisible dust devil.
---
2014/11/10 - broken back

Date's probably wrong. This was a fuckin' dope on a rope PARAglider with a totally clueless driver.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LED3q88rGw

---
2015/03/27 - tandem - dead pilot and passenger

Kelly Harrison and Arys Moorhead. Negligent suicide/homicide. Total clusterfuck.
---
No 2012/10/03 - Bob Buxton? He didn't hit hard enough and mush his brain sufficiently enough to make the grade?

And one wonders why 2012/06/06 - Paul Vernon ain't on the list - seeing as how his devastating brain mushing wheat field whack had every bit as much to do with the tow launch as did Kevin O'Brien and Joe Julik. Ditto for idiot Scott C. Wise's Bertrand Delacroix. Rest assured that that one will go on Rick's tow disasters list at the next update.

Total junk. Sloppy work, dates off, the ones I can't match are probably paraglider incidents, inclusion of totally unrelated landing crashes in the category, maybe a mountain launch by a downtubes flyer thrown in for good measure. If someone were to circuit tow up out of Jean Lake, fly two hundred miles to the Owens, and snap his neck with a mistimed flare thirty yards from where Rick had just finished a sled run that motherfucker would count it as a truck tow fatality.

Back in the earlyish Eighties we'd get an occasional report of somebody buying a standard at a yard sale, running a rope from the trailer hitch to the basetube, and making the evening news. These would be legitimately dismissed as irrelevant fringe activity. Well now we have corporate lawyer based aviation and just relabeled fringe activity as mainstream - "typical" as Mark G. Forbes likes to call it.

Look at that list and show me a single crash - with the possible exception of Kevin O'Brien - that wasn't a consequence of totally wacko fringe activity. Placebo releases, deliberately decertified gliders, towlines deliberately frayed to a breaking point a hair above normal climbing tension, unqualified students and drivers, flagrant violations of SOPs, zero oversight and accountability.

But none of that shit is the problem. The problem is that hang glider towing is inherently and unacceptably dangerous because of its complexity. And you can bet your bottom dollar that motherfucker doesn't maintain any kind of databases on mountain launch and landing disasters 'cause they'd dwarf the stuff he's tried to concoct for tow - 'specially when one starts looking at them with respect to numbers of flights made in the two flavors.

Somebody find me a serious towing incident in which the equipment was certified to a degree comparable to what the glider itself was and the people on both ends of the line performed in halfway competent manners. Such incidents DO NOT EXIST. You hear about a crash involving a glider trying to get airborne from something flat start thinking fringe activity. You will NEVER go wrong.

But:
For me, hang gliding is about running off the earth into the sky. I don't need help.
So therefore towing's gotta be inherently and insanely dangerous for everybody else. (And ignoring the fact that if running off the earth into the sky can be done more easily and safely off of flat ground than it can off a mountain if that's what really floats your stupid boat.)
Is that enough slack?
Be careful, pitiful flatlanders.
Suck my dick, Rick. And lemme know if you start getting some actual airtime one of these decades.

And make sure you keep this guy as one of your top couple cocksuckers, Bob. ALL paras and MOST hangs already hate his guts. Keep encouraging him to alienate all the people who don't have three thousand foot mountains rising up from the deserts in their backyards. That'll do wonders for your efforts to provide a national hang gliding association alternative - 'specially in the people of varying ages department.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=2033
Freedom of expression on the Hawks forum
Frank Colver - 2015/07/26 19:21:42 UTC

To the US Hawks BoD,

I fully understand why BobK and others want this forum to be pretty much unrestricted as a result of their experiences with other HG forums shutting out opinion the moderator didn't like. However, my experience with other (non-HG forums) have seen them degenerate into political and religious hateful arguments that were way off the topic of the forum. Eventually, these forums became destroyed and lost usefulness.

My suggestion to the US Hawks board would be to remove any political opinion that is not directly related to HG or PG organizations. The politics of the operation of those organizations should be OK subjects but not civic governments' politics unless pertaining to HG / PG regulations, example; discussions of FAA regs and proposed regs, affecting HG & PG should be OK subjects for forum discussion and that could include a government's regulation of a flying site (city, county, state, federal). But unrelated political opinion of governments should go elsewhere.

I also suggest that there be zero tolerance for any religious opinions expressed on the forum. There are other forums for that freedom.
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/27 18:01:12 UTC

Thanks for the input Frank. I've posted the following for the rest of the Board members to think about.

Hello Fellow Board Members,

Frank Colver posted this to the Issues topic:
Frank Colver - 2015/07/26 19:21:42 UTC

...
Frank hasn't been the first one to express a concern about off-topic posts in the main forum. I've been somewhat hesitant about moving off-topic posts, and I often just issue a warning to keep it to a minimum and leave it at that.

So the question - in my mind - is what procedure do we want (if any) for deciding when a post or topic should be moved. Also, there may be more than one "level" of dealing with off topic posts:

- Deleting them completely.
- Moving them to the Off Topic forum without leaving a trace.
- Moving them to the Off Topic forum leaving a link (the link will fade in time even if the topic continues to get posts).
- Leaving them, but issuing a warning.

On top of those questions, we need to decide what to do (if anything) with people who make off-topic posts:

- Ban them completely and remove all their posts.
- Ban them completely and leave all their posts.
- Ban them temporarily.
- Restrict them to the Free Speech Zone.
- Warn them (how many warnings until further restriction?).

With a sole moderator (such as on hanggliding.org or Oz Forum or KiteStrings) it's easy for the sole moderator to do whatever he wants without conforming to any defined set of rules or consistency of action. That's been the problem and that's what we'd like to improve upon.

Any thoughts?
Frank Colver - 2015/07/26 19:21:42 UTC

To the US Hawks BoD...
There is no US Hawks BoD. The US Hawks BoD is a scam Bob's maintaining. Not one person on it got anybody's vote other than Bob's to be on the list and the only member who has any actual power is Bob. And he has 100.00 percent of the power - as has been the case for the "association's" entire history, five years minus two and a half weeks at the moment.
I fully understand why BobK and others want this forum to be pretty much unrestricted as a result of their experiences with other HG forums shutting out opinion the moderator didn't like.
1. Name some "moderators".
2. Like BobK did to Tad and Steve?
3. Kite Strings is a science classroom and deals pretty successfully with the OPINIONS issue by not tolerating ANY.
However, my experience with other (non-HG forums) have seen them degenerate into political and religious hateful arguments that were way off the topic of the forum. Eventually, these forums became destroyed and lost usefulness.
Glad you specified non-HG. Otherwise you'd hafta point to some glider forums that actually ever had any usefulness to lose.
I also suggest that there be zero tolerance for any religious opinions expressed on the forum.
1. Isn't that suggestion itself an expression of an opinion on religion? Happens to be one I'm totally in line with but it would put an end to pretty much the only response the hang gliding "community" has to serious incidents - prayers for victims, friends, and families.

2. Tell me how Bob's banning of Yours Truly wasn't done under the cover of and with an appeal to religious bigotry and hypocrisy.

3. How 'bout the 130 pound Greenspot standard aerotow weak link? Argue that the focal point of our safe towing system was based upon something other than religion.

Hang gliding has ALWAYS been a religion based mutant flavor of pseudo aviation.

- Heard the argument that weak links always break at the worst possible time, when the glider's climbing hard in a near stall situation? Use a lighter weak link that's more likely to break at the worst possible time, when the glider's climbing hard in a near stall situation. Problem solved.

- Crashed and broke your arm in a Happy Acres putting green perfecting no-step landings to make you a safe pilot? Spend more weekends perfecting no-step landings in Happy Acres putting greens. Above all, don't question the value of no-step landings in making your flying safer. After all, the no-step landing has been the mark of the expert pilot from the earliest days of hang gliding.
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/27 18:01:12 UTC

Thanks for the input Frank. I've posted the following for the rest of the Board members to think about.
How many do you have who are capable of thinking?
Frank hasn't been the first one to express a concern about off-topic posts in the main forum.
And watch out trying to stay on-topic in the main forum. Bob will sabotage any and all efforts made to get the sport on solid ground.
I've been somewhat hesitant about moving off-topic posts, and I often just issue a warning to keep it to a minimum and leave it at that.
Haven't been very hesitant about moving on-topic posters to Bob's Basement whenever you feel like running an experiment for about a month, have ya Bob?
So the question - in my mind - is what procedure do we want (if any) for deciding when a post or topic should be moved.
Why worry? What we've wanted has always been what Bob's wanted and the procedure has always been Bob does whatever the fuck he feels like and trumps up justifications at his leisure.
Also, there may be more than one "level" of dealing with off topic posts:

- Deleting them completely.
- Moving them to the Off Topic forum without leaving a trace.
- Moving them to the Off Topic forum leaving a link (the link will fade in time even if the topic continues to get posts).
- Leaving them, but issuing a warning.

On top of those questions, we need to decide what to do (if anything) with people who make off-topic posts:

- Ban them completely and remove all their posts.
- Ban them completely and leave all their posts.
- Ban them temporarily.
- Restrict them to the Free Speech Zone.
- Warn them (how many warnings until further restriction?).
So in other words, THIS:

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/faq.php
Frequently Asked Questions
What will keep the US Hawks from becoming another USHPA or HGAA?
One big difference between the US Hawks and other organizations is that the US Hawks really does honor the free speech of its members.
is total bullshit. Death of the principle by a thousand asterisks.

And let's not forget that one's only permitted on The Bob Show in the first place after passing Emperor Bob's mandatory telephone screening. Unrepentant child molesters need not apply.
With a sole moderator (such as on hanggliding.org or Oz Forum or KiteStrings)...
LIAR. Kite Strings has always had the highest ratio of moderators to active participants on the planet. Everybody who's expressed any interest in becoming a moderator has been given the privilege. Granted, that number is zero at present but there are three official moderators plus another who has my password. Wanna talk about sole "moderators" look in a fuckin' mirror. Even the Oz Forum has twice as many moderators as The Bob Show. And fuck, who in Jack's Living Room has the slightest complaint about the way Jack's running anything? And that place is saturated with fast learners and over-achievers. Just ask one of them if you don't believe me.
it's easy for the sole moderator to do whatever he wants without conforming to any defined set of rules or consistency of action.
Make a case that that's ever been done to any extent whatsoever on Kite Strings. I banned your ass for pretty much nonstop and totally grotesque violations of the very liberal defined set of rules. And still I've unbanned you so that you have full member access to the site and have posted and responded to every punctuation make you've wanted to appear here - plus a lot of punctuation marks you undoubtedly haven't.
That's been the problem...
Doesn't seem to have been a problem...
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/11 18:16:54 UTC

I just wanted to offer a general thanks for all of the information that you capture and preserve on your site. I find it to be a helpful reference when all else fails.
...here Bob. Kite Strings is a lot more effective fulfilling its mission when it's not being overwhelmed by Homosexual-Relationship-With-A-12-Year-Old-Boy spam.
...and that's what we'd like to improve upon.
How many Bob Show members authorized you to speak on their behalf?

Zack and I founded Kite Strings in late November of 2010 and had the mission statement and SOPs defined in several short sentences within the first two posts. Since then there's been NOTHING we'd liked to have improved upon and no complaints about how it's been run or suggestions for improvement. And if you disagree then quote something from anywhere.
Any thoughts?
Yeah Bob. Establish some black and white SOPs to replace your total bullshit ideals about really honoring the free speech of members.

If you want to make The Bob Show a safe place for people of varying ages to visit by barring unrepentant child molesters from membership then put it in print. And make sure you also put in print your procedures for identifying and screening out unrepentant child molesters. Probably wanna do something like the US government does for security clearances. Send investigators out to existing and prospective members' home turfs and question neighbors, friends, employers, coworkers. It's amazing the kinda shit you can find out with that approach.

Get back to me on 2020/08/15 and lemme know how much progress you've made in establishing a viable alternative to u$hPa.
Rick Masters - 2015/07/27 20:05:42 UTC

BobK covered this pretty well by providing a Free Speech Forum.
Ain't he the best!
It's a tidy solution already in place.
And he's got a tidy procedure for having that solution implemented on people - whatever he fuckin' feels like.
If people will exercise their ability to discern between flying issues and everything else, there won't be a problem.
But do all the Homosexual-Relationship-With-A-12-Year-Old-Boy spam you feel like to try to derail people wanting to address flying issues 'cause that's an enormous amount of fun.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2034
HG Future ?
Rick Masters - 2015/07/27 18:18:37 UTC

I suggest 5 ratings.
I suggest you go fuck yourself.
BEGINNER
A BEGINNER must train for a minimum of 3 months before progressing and meet skill and performance requirements defined by the BOD.
Yeah, pilot proficiency is all a function of months.

I got my Two on 1980/04/07 from Kitty Hawk after 43 dune flights over a period of five days. Came back to work as an "instructor" (mostly pony rides supervisor) in early October and over a span of 52 days ending on 1980/11/23 racked up another 180 flights - including some really demanding dune soaring.

If we cut out the big gap that's 57 days so I still don't get my Fly-Straight-Off-The-Top-Of-The-Training-Hill-And-Land-In-A-Smooth-Seven-Mile-Per-Hour-Headwind rating 'cause The Great Rick Masters says I have less than two thirds of the required jerking off time. But if I run off a training hill two or three times a month for three months...
No BEGINNER may participate in towing or tandem flights. A petition put forward to the BOD by the head of a Chapter or by 3 ADVANCED members of a Chapter providing evidence of negligence will be subject to a vote of the BOD for removal of the BEGINNER rating and removal of OBSERVER status from the ADVANCED/OBSERVER responsible.
Oh fuck. I took a tow (with a control frame bridle) on a stationary Yarnall winch to five hundred feet on 1980/11/14 so I'm back to asshole off the street status and Doug Rice is out of his job as Senior Instructor. 'Cause for some egomaniacal dickhead from Southern California who hasn't clipped into a glider for thirty years hang gliding is about running off the earth into the sky and doesn't need help.

Fuck you, Rick. Ditto for the other Bob Show assholes reading this crap and doing nothing about it.
Post Reply