You are NEVER hooked in.

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1703
Lift and Tug Failure Near Death Experience
Merlin - 2015/02/04 14:16:15 UTC

Ask yourself this: have you ever left the house with your sneakers on the wrong feet?

To prevent this, do you -
- use a checklist
- cultivate a permanent state of swapped footwear anxiety
- paint "CHECK YOUR SNEAKERS" on the door threshold
- come up with ritualized behaviors because nothing else seems to be working

DId you ever put the wrong shoe on a foot, say in the dark? Kinda instantly, painfully obvious.
DId you ever hold the shift key down a little too long at the beginning of a sentence and click "Submit" without spellchecking or looking over what you'd written?
The problem: harnesses in the"wrong" configuration "feel" very similar to those in the "right" configuration. If harnesses felt almost painfully awkward misconfigured, this would be an exceedingly rare problem. It would be interesting to see designers pay some attention to this.
1. What's stopping you from being a designer or suggesting a modification?
2. I take it you're totally OK with all the "release" "designs" Bobby Fucking-Genius Bailey pulled out of his ass over a quarter century ago.
With my cacoon...
Speaking of spellchecks.
I used to pull the suspension lines tight across the front, passing the 'biner thru the boot loop and attaching it the shoulder loop. This would both keep the lines from fouling and create such a twisted feel to the harness (also leaving the 'biner in plain view) - I could never quite forget about it.
Well cool, dude. Then whenever you're standing at launch in your cacoon and everything feels fine and everything out front looks fine you're totally good to go and thus never have any incentive to subject yourself to the dangerous compromise of any kind of hook-in check.

Awesome analogy with the sneakers, by the way. Take a problem that doesn't and can't possibly exist - similar to the problem we have of putting all of our battens in upside down - and use it for a model for a totally nonexistent solution for a REAL problem in our sport that manifests itself all the time and frequently results in mangled gliders and bodies, deaths of would-be pilots and would-be passengers, international news, negligent homicide convictions.

But you're not doing anything to make The Bob Show an unsafe place for people of varying ages to visit or challenging Bob or The Industry on anything so you're top notch Bob Show material.
Warren Narron - 2015/02/04 17:01:03 UTC

Lift and tug is not the point

My bad. The title of this thread may mislead people to think a ~hook in~ check before launching is a mandate of lift and tug. Not so. It's about a mindset that says you don't go out the door without your pants on.
The problem: harnesses in the"wrong" configuration "feel" very similar to those in the "right" configuration.
Yes, if you screw up the ~hang~ check then a lift and tug ~hook in~ check is not going to be as effective as any other method you may use to verify that you are still hooked in.
Warren, I have no freakin' clue what you're saying / trying to say with that.
Merlin - 2015/02/04 18:37:04 UTC
It's about a mindset that says you don't go out the door without your pants on.
Exactly. That's how you want your harness to feel unhooked.
But it's quite easy to walk out with a t-shirt inside out. (feels right).

There are various methods to check your hook in status. Lift 'n Tug has been around for forty years. (It was a lot easier with a 35 pound standard).
Right. We frequently need to pitch the nose down and use crews to keep the glider from lifting off prematurely but glider weight is a real big issue. So how many people do YOU typically use to help you carry the dead weight of your seventy pound glider to launch position?
If it was going to work, it would have by now.
Right. Lift and tug doesn't work. If it did it would have by now. But it NEVER tells the pilot that he's connected to his glider and has his leg loops.

13-03110
http://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3697/13700915564_87a2a336b0_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2912/13700562685_86575e9220_o.png
14-03129

That can ONLY be done using Joe Greblo's Four or Five Cs. And the PROOF that it can't work is that...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4247
Hook in failure in New Zealand
Jim Rooney - 2006/09/24 21:19:29 UTC

Ok, this thread's a million miles long already (and mostly my fault at that), so I'm not going to feel bad about making it a tad longer.

A couple things to chew on here...

There isn't one sure-fire answer.
If there was, we'd all be doing it already. This thread I think makes this obvious... every single thing people have put forth as "the way", someone else has show how it can fail. Every single one. Argue about the details, but every single one fails.

Here's the real trick of it in my book (especially with new technology, but it applies to methods too)...
Whatever you change only works on that glider/site/whatever.
What happens when you're off flying somewhere else or flying someone else's gear?

Someone suggested putting a red flag on the nose of the glider that gets removed after the hang check... this way, if you haven't hooked in, it's really obvious. Say this works for you and you get used to it. Then you borrow a glider or fly a different site on a rented glider. In your world, no red streamer means "good to go".

Take aussie vs clipin if you like... what happens when you're at a site that you can't use the aussie method with? (I can name you some cliff launches that you can't if you care). Now you're used to the security of the aussie method, and it's not there. You might say that the fear will help you, but your instincts will say otherwise (the fear is highlevel thought, and highlevel thought is the first thing that gets tossed out of your brain.. else we'd never launch unhooked in the first place).

Argue if you will about the examples (whatever), the trick of it isn't the method to me, it's how using new things doesn't work (and actually causes problems) in strange ways (like when going back to "normal" flying after getting used to the new method/device).

Enough about what doesn't work though... what does?
Since we don't have a plug that only fits one way, we fall on lesser methods, but some are better than others...

In particular... Third Party Verification.
You won't save you, but your friends might.
Not always, but they're more reliable than you.
Why do you think that airline checklists (yes our lovely checklists) are check-verified by pilot AND copilot?

That's all I got for ya.
The other topics have been beat to death here.
If there was an answer, we'd all already be doing it.
...not everybody's doing it. It's like wheels. If they REALLY made landings fifty times safer than the bare basetube stuff...

67-24601
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7456/15777689393_8397c411bc_o.png
Image
Image
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8602/16210077908_d71fe12c28_o.png
87-25009

...don't you think everyone would be using them?
Time to recast the problem.
Yeah, let's get the manufacturers to design all the harnesses such that not clipping in before a flight, unclipping after or between flights causes the pilot immediate stabbing pain - comparable to what you'd get tying right and left sneakers onto left and right feet. That'll DEFINITELY work 'cause everyone will immediately buy and start using such harnesses.
Time to recast the problem.
What a fucking incredible maga-asshole.
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/02/04 18:44:57 UTC

This is one of the best ideas I've heard.
ME TOO! Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Possibly even BETTER than the Kellner Mirror and the Voight/Rooney Instant Hands Free Release!
I usually hook my 'biner onto my harness through a loop that's attached to the front to keep the lines straight. That configuration is actually quite comfortable on my harness, so your post got me to thinking about a less comfortable place to attach it.
Twist some barbed wire to secure it to your dick.
I don't know if this would work for all harnesses, but what about connecting the 'biner to your chin strap?
Yeah, that may be even better. With a bit o' luck you could snap your neck tripping over a gear bag.
It's not only somewhat uncomfortable, but also really really obvious to yourself and anyone watching.
Yeah, that it would be. 'Specially to your...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1152
Bill Priday's death
Cragin Shelton - 2005/10/03 15:13:27 UTC

You are not hooked in until after the hang check.
...Cragin Shelton types.
If it can't reach, then maybe add a brightly colored extension that connects to the chin strap. I may experiment with this idea a bit.
And DO post some good high resolution photos for us.
Great idea Merlin.
Shit, Bob. The Bob Show is a veritable cauldron of great ideas! Image I'm wondering if the sport will be able to sustain itself trying to keep pace with all the fantastic ideas coming out of your mutual masturbation society.
Thanks for sharing it!! Image

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
DEFINITELY.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1703
Lift and Tug Failure Near Death Experience
Warren Narron - 2015/02/04 19:39:01 UTC

Excerpt: Moderated response to Bob, from Tad @ Kitestrings.org
I so hate being moderated.
This explains Rob Kells, view on hook in checks:

From Tad Eareckson: http://www.kitestrings.org/post7371.html#p7371
~To Bob K.~
Who the Image Image Image Image do you think you are?...
Warren Narron - 2015/02/04 20:05:40 UTC
Warren Narron - 2015/02/04 17:01:03 UTC

It's about a mindset that says you don't go out the door without your pants on.
Merlin - 2015/02/04 18:37:04 UTC

Exactly. That's how you want your harness to feel unhooked.
But it's quite easy to walk out with a t-shirt inside out. (feels right).
Not exactly.
What I was saying is that you don't launch without some way of confirming you are hooked in.
Hang checks don't count because of your short term memory.
As we can plainly see looking at the decades of hang checker fatalities.
Are you really sure you want to make the commitment of hucking yourself off a cliff without testing this deadly short term memory?
I sure hope he is. I LOVE having assholes like that in my case study collection.
There are various methods to check your hook in status. Lift 'n Tug has been around for forty years.
Yes.
(It was a lot easier with a 35 pound standard).
Telling your age.
If it was going to work, it would have by now.
It does work.
No it doesn't.
Helen McKerral - 2010/01/28 04:15:06 UTC
Adelaide Hills, South Australia

Hiya Tad,

I've been doing the lift and tug for some months now, after our discussion. It's good and it works.
Merlin just told you it doesn't work.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=18876
Hang glider Crash
Allen Sparks - 2010/09/07 01:03:18 UTC

Helen,

Thanks for the Tad 'lift and tug' reminder.

I have launched unhooked and experienced the horror of hanging by my fingers over jagged rocks ... and the surreal result - i.e. not being significantly injured.

I am a firm believer in 'lift and tug' and the mindset of assuming I am not hooked in. It is motivated by the recurring memory of my own experience ... and the tragic deaths and life-altering injuries of good friends.
You deaf or sumpin'?
Time to recast the problem.
The problem of launching unhooked is as old as hang gliding.
The plaster set way back and now shows sign of crumbling.

This is not rocket science.
I think it's more a mental issue.
We are not robots. We are not computers.
Our minds are not infallible.
There is no pill that I know of that will fix this problem.
If you're scared shitless of launching unhooked all the time - as anyone with a functional brain should be - you don't need a pill. It's not THAT MUCH different from landing. On a glider you've got one shot to get it right and if you start taking things for granted too much too often you can end up nicely mangled or dead. Anybody report problems not being able to fully appreciate the seriousness of that phase of the flight operation?
A lift and tug greatly lessens the pain.

Don't leave your house without your pants.
Don't start your launch run without a last hook in check.
If it's not the last thing you do immediately before moving a foot it's not a hook-in check. It's a placebo. And a launch ramp is no place to be feeling good because you THINK you took something that'll address the problem.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4247
Hook in failure in New Zealand
Jim Rooney - 2006/09/19 18:30:03 UTC

Ah... I think I can speak with a little authority on this topic ;)
Really? I'd be fuckin' astonished to find a topic on which you COULDN'T speak with a little authority.
The first thing you learn, if you live, is that your precious hang check isn't going to save you.
Couldn't you have learned that ago by reading Rob's article on the subject...
Rob Kells - 2005/12

Following a recent fatal accident caused by the pilot launching unhooked, there has been a discussion on how to guarantee that you are hooked in. The two main methods are:

1. Always do a hang check before launch, and/or

2. Always hook your harness into the glider before you get into the harness.

Interestingly, NEITHER of these methods GUARANTEES that you will not launch unhooked some day. Let's add a third one:

3. Always lift the glider vertically and feel the tug on the leg straps when the harness mains go tight, just before you start your launch run. I always use this test.
...in the magazine the better part of ten months ago? That went out the better part of three months before your little boo-boo at Coronet Peak on 2006/02/21. Was there something unclear or illogical about his statement on the issue? Was there some reason you needed to launch unhooked and dive your glider and passenger into the powerlines to reach that same conclusion yourself? Do you always need to three quarters kill yourself to be able to internalize basic concepts that leaders in the sport have espoused for decades?
Your friend might save you, but even a religious obscession with hang checks won't.
Damn! Even a religious obscession won't work for you? Sounds like you're not left with many good arrows in your quiver.
It has to do with the way the mind works.
My mind doesn't work all that well. I'm not anywhere near as gifted as you are - what with your keen intellect. Please be patient explaining things to me.
I'm digging up a very good paper on the topic...
That would be nice.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=31781
Another hang check lesson
Alan Deikman - 2014/09/23 19:47:06 UTC

Amazing how when this topic comes up every time you see people argue the same arguments over and over again. It has been a classic (although niche) endless Internet flame topic.

I suspect that some of the parties that have posted in threads like these before are refraining now since they have learned that it is nearly (completely?) impossible to change people's minds on the topic.

For my part I will just refer you to the classic Tad Eareckson essay which I call "the gun is always loaded" which is a bit overworked but probably all you will ever need to read regarding FTHI. A lot of people will find it gores their particular sacred Ox, but I have never seen anyone point out a flaw in his logic.
Would it say the same sorta thing that Rob did in his article?
I can't seem to find it at the moment.
Issue with your memory?
See the trick of the matter is that you will think you did one.
Wow! That's some keen intellect ya got there! Not only can you tell us what you will think...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3600
Weak link question
Jim Rooney - 2008/11/22 22:31:35 UTC

Nail on the head Brian!

The simple fact is this. The only reason anyone even gives Tad the time of day is that they want to believe him. Why? Because they don't like to be inconvenienced by a weaklink break. That's it.

Sure, everyone digs around for other reasons to believe, but at the heart of it, it's convenience.
No one is actually scared to fly with a standard weaklink. They may say they are, but deep down inside, they're not.
...you've got all our bases covered as well.
I'm not kidding... you'll swear on your life (litterally) that you did do a hang check.
Yeah, I do that all the time - even though...
Rob Kells - 2005/12

My partners (Steve Pearson and Mike Meier) and I have over 25,000 hang glider flights between us and have managed (so far) to have hooked in every time. I also spoke with test pilots Ken Howells and Peter Swanson about their methods (another 5000 flights). Not one of us regularly uses either of the two most popular methods outlined above.
...I pretty much never do hang checks.
You will believe whole heartedly...
That wholeheartedly is two words?
...not that you're hooked in, but that you DID a hang check. And then you find out that you didn't.
I already know I didn't - asshole.
Human behavior is the weakest link in the chain, yet we trust it above all other solutions.
When the only thing we can REALLY trust above all other solutions is the...

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8394/8696380718_787dbc0005_o.png
Image

...130 pound Greenspot weakest link in the chain. Can't go wrong with anything with that long of a track record.
We use training and education as the primary means to fix problems when they are the least reliable of all options.
Sounds to me like we should totally scrap training and education and use all that time and effort on whatever that other thing is you're about to recommend. You know, the thing that served you so well for the first couple hundred flights of your foot launch career.
...(yes, checklists.. even written checklists fall into this category).
Can ya tone it down a little? Greg Porter may be within earshot.
Do not get lulled into the false sense of security of "it won't happen to me because I'm so meticulous".
Also never get lulled into the kind of false sense of security you get from...

http://www.rmhpa.org/messageboard/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4258
HG accident in Vancouver
Tom Galvin - 2012/10/31 22:17:21 UTC

I don't teach lift and tug, as it gives a false sense of security.
...doing hook-in checks.
The easy answer is to say "you can't launch unhooked if you do a hang check every single time".
Why would anyone respond with that easy answer when...
Robert V. Wills - 1980/04

1979/06/22 - Marvin (Sam) White - 20 - Alpha 185 - Chandler Mountain - Steele, Alabama

A tragedy with a clear lesson. White did a harness check on himself, but then unhooked to check his cousin's gear. Forgot to hook in again. Fell 150' to a rocky ledge.
...it's pretty fuckin' obvious that you CAN launch unhooked after doing a hang check every single time?
Saying it will make you feel good, but relying on it as your answer to hookin failure can be fatal.
So what are you recommending we rely on as our answer. Luck? Prayer?
I'll see about digging up that article.
Oh good. I'll bet the motherfucker who wrote it has ten times the foot launch hang gliding experience that Rob Kells does.

http://www.nzhgpa.org.nz/docs/o_hareparsonspolicereport.pdf
Jim Rooney - 2006/09/19 19:52:29 UTC

Yeah, it is scary.
Finding out that you can't trust yourself sorta sucks.
I found out I couldn't trust you about the third time we crossed paths.
Asking someone to check you is suseptable to the same "omission" problems as a checklist...
Like the "omission" problem of omitting the "c" and the "i" from "susceptible"?
YOU must do it. Having someone else demand it is a better process.
We should probably all just hire other people to do our jobs for us.
I found the article... I can't find it online anymore, so I put it up on my server
http://gohanggliding.com/text/NZ_summary.html
http://gohanggliding.com/text/NZ_summary.pdf

It's about a fatal tandem hookin failure some years ago.
Steve Parson. He picked up a manslaughter conviction for that one, didn't he?
The aussie method doesn't work tandem.
And what you were doing tandem really did.
I'm a bit partial to his "any inturruption should mean a 1 minute timeout".
Hey everybody! Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney is a bit partial to his "any inturruption should mean a 1 minute timeout". We should probably all be a bit partial to it too. This is a pretty serious issue. We should probably all be a bit partial to as many approaches as possible.

But being a bit partial to "any inturruption should mean a 1 minute timeout" doesn't mean you're actually conforming, right? So are you actually conforming? Is ANYONE actually doing this? I don't recall hearing anyone say that they've implemented this bullshit. Seems to me that if we all took one minute times out for any interruption we'd all end up breaking our gliders down on launch in the dark.
If there was a way to change the system so it wouldn't work if you aren't hooked it, I'd be for that (the aussie method is an attempt, but again, that doesn't work tandem).
Doesn't work so good with...

11-A12819
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8339/28924980016_2ba1d20ef7_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8253/28924975726_0d24a615c2_o.png
13-A14319

...solo either.
3rd party challenge (not pilot initiated verification) and timeouts seem to be the only other real alternative.
Boy it sure is a good thing you got into hang gliding when you did to tell us what seem to be the only other real alternatives.
I know they've started using streamers (that must be removed) in Queenstown.
What do they call them? Rooney Rags?
Jim Rooney - 2006/09/25 11:37:18 UTC

i've been preaching this stuff for a long time...
Yeah. Kind of a waste that you went into hang gliding. You'd have made such a great preacher.
that's the irony... i was one of those 'hang checks will save you' guys.
Who are some of the other 'hang checks will save you' guys?

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1152
Bill Priday's death
Cragin Shelton - 2005/10/03 15:13:27 UTC

I remarked that 'you are not hooked in until after the hang check.'
Good thing he got through to Bill Priday when he did, wasn't it?
christ... my email was jim @hangcheck.com!
Christ... What is it now? jim @130poundgreenspun.com?
i was the religious finatic about checking.
Is there anything in hang gliding that you're not the religious finatic about?
i did do hookin checks (after hang checks)
Check the requirements of your rating. When do they say you're supposed to do hook-in checks? Also, check the adjustment of your shift key - douchebag.
i did all the stuff you guys are saying will save you
Hooking in, hang checks, checklists, hook-in checks, Aussie Method when you were flying solo...
guess what?
I have no fuckin' clue. What?
all that stuff is good stuff to do... it helps with other problems. but it helps with other problems.

if you think that you're immune to omissions because you this, or you do that, then god help you.
Why do you think God didn't bother helping you? I'da thunk he'd have been really looking out for a religious finatic who does as much preaching as you do.
i did all the stuff you guys are saying will save you
So you did all the stuff us guys are saying will save you - hooking in, hang check, checklist, hook-in check. But on that particular flight you forgot to hook in, do the hang check, run through the checklist, do the hook-in check. And, obviously, you falsely remembered having done all those because you always do them. Wow! What are the odds! Must've been a really bad day to have forgotten and falsely remembered all four.

I'm guessing it was also the first time you'd missed even one of them on any of your launches because you've never reported having done so.

I always did a hook-in check over the span of a couple decades of foot launch career. Never missed a single one. I'd have considered a single miss a terrifying catastrophic failure and would've seriously questioned my aptitude for continuing in the sport. Also, much less importantly, never missed hooking in - although I did ONE partial.

And yet the ONLY thing YOU've ever talked about is missing the hang check. So are you really sure you were doing all the stuff we guys are saying will save you? Or were you just hooking in and doing the fucking hang check that Rob Kells had shortly before specifically said WON'T save you and was so useless that none of the Wills Wing crew - all individuals with experience dwarfing yours - bothered doing it except when necessary to check bar clearance?

Lying goddam piece o' shit.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=32475
Hang check?
michael170 - 2015/02/15 05:50:38 UTC

What is the function of a hang check?
To...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1153
Hooking In
Steve Kinsley - 2005/10/02 02:45:48 UTC

When Bob Gillisse got hurt I suggested that our local institution of the hang check is more the problem than the solution. I still believe that. It subverts the pilot's responsibility to perform a hook-in check. I often do not see pilots doing a hook-in check. Why should they? They just did a hang check and they are surrounded by friends who will make sure this box is checked.
...give the would-be pilot a false sense of security and...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1152
Bill Priday's death
Cragin Shelton - 2005/10/03 15:13:27 UTC

I just read the following item from the OzForum by a secondary on-site (not witness) report:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=924
Tragedy at Team Challenge
Hexenwolfe - 2005/10/02 14:19:48 UTC

According to at least five local pilots, Bill had set up his glider and was moving it closer to launch. Again, according to at least five pilots, Bill was asked if he wanted a hang check, but was heard to say "It has been taken care of".
This is eerie, because Hank Hengst and I were involved with an almost identical conversation with Bill at the Pulpit Fly-In. As we were walking Bill up to the old ramp, with me on right wing and Hank on nose, Hank asked bill if he wanted a hang check. Bill's reply was something like, "No thanks, I'm good." Hank then pointed out that he was not hooked in. I remarked that 'you are not hooked in until after the hang check.' We ran Bill through a routine lay-down hang check at the back of the ramp, and he had a fine launch.
...total fucking assholes like Cragin something to run their mouths about before and after somebody who was taught that he wasn't hooked in hooked in until after the hang check gets killed.
Don Arsenault - 2015/02/15 05:57:46 UTC

To make sure it isn't getting any smaller.
What? Your brain? As long as you've got a pulse you won't have any worries in that department.
Paul Hurless - 2015/02/15 06:03:31 UTC

To give Michael170 something to pontificate about.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=31781
Another hang check lesson
Paul Hurless - 2014/09/27 17:54:15 UTC

Lift and tug, which was not invented by Tad, isn't a banned subject.
The psychopathic Tad and his rants are what's banned.
Michael Farren - 2015/02/15 08:47:35 UTC
South Bunbury

To make sure that you and your wing are getting along together.
It usually does that fairly well - while you're doing it. But I've never seen a foot launcher do a hang check at a time and place at which it mattered whether or not he and his wing were together.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=32475
Hang check?
AndRand - 2015/02/15 11:19:30 UTC

full procedure:
check-recheck-then czech again-and hang check
Yep...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1167
The way it outa be
Steve Kinsley - 2005/10/04 14:04:25 UTC

One last attempt.

We have now rounded up all the usual suspects and promised renewed vigilance, nine page checklists, hang checks every six feet, etc. Bob Gillisse redux.

A hang check is part of preflighting your equipment. You do it in the setup area - not on the launch or the ramp. When you get in line you are hooked in and ready to go. No going down for a hang check cum hook-in check.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25550
Failure to hook in.
Steve Davy - 2011/10/24 10:27:04 UTC

OK- how many times does he need confirm that he is hooked in? And when would be the best time to make that confirmation?
Brian McMahon - 2011/10/24 21:04:17 UTC

Once, just prior to launch.
Christian Williams - 2011/10/25 03:59:58 UTC

I agree with that statement.

What's more, I believe that all hooked-in checks prior to the last one before takeoff are a waste of time, not to say dangerous, because they build a sense of security which should not be built more than one instant before commitment to flight.
Keep building up that sense of security so that it's maxed out by the final fifteen second window.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13132
Unhooked Death Again - Change our Methods Now?
JBBenson - 2009/01/25 16:27:19 UTC

I get what Tad is saying, but it took some translation:
HANG CHECK is part of the preflight, to verify that all the harness lines etc. are straight.
HOOK-IN CHECK is to verify connection to the glider five seconds before takeoff.
They are separate actions, neither interchangeable nor meant to replace one another. They are not two ways to do the same thing.
Allen Sparks - 2015/02/15 13:39:14 UTC

I use hang check to check my height above the base tube. I only do a hang check when I get a new glider, new harness, or make a change to my hang strap.

I do not do a hang check to ensure I am connected to my glider. It is not necessary for me, in my opinion.
Rob Kells - 2005/12

I always do a hang check when I get in a new harness or after I've worked on one. I do not usually do a hang check on later flights unless I'm aerotowing and have to lie down in the cart.
To ensure I am connected to my glider, I do a hook in check. I do a hook in check once when I connect the harness, which is always before I move my glider from where I assemble it, at least once after I move my wing to launch, and once just prior to launch.
Image
Fuckin' Tad Clone. (Shouldn't you be pissing all over him, Paul?)
2015/02/15 16:37:18 UTC - 3 thumbs up - Heli1
Fuck you too.
JJ Coté - 2015/02/15 14:28:08 UTC

Making sure that the harness lines are straight, etc.
Yeah, make sure those lines are straight, et cetera. Launching with unstraight lines et cetera is near certain dead. And a hang check...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T19GtqUnXDo


...is really the only good way to make sure your lines are straight, et cetera.
Rob Kells - 2005/12

I always hang my carabiner in a loop on the front of my harness right after I unhook from the glider. This assures that the lines remain untwisted next time I hook in.
It's not like you could do a walk-through and just look at them or anything.

Hey Tom... Aren't you gonna warn Allen about the false sense of security he'll be giving himself and the dangerous example he'll be setting?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=32475
Hang check?
Willie VanRocker - 2015/02/15 23:33:57 UTC
Stoney Creek, Ontario

I use it to live.
Mike Robertson product, right? Big fuckin' surprise.
Hang check is because I have people to love after my flight.
So did Kunio...

Image

Goddam hang checks never once prevented him from launching unhooked and the hundred times was worse than nothing mindset killed him while the people he loved were watching.
01 Hooked in, (two loops if not using a single riser spec'ed to huge tensile numbers)
02 Beaner locked
03 Rising and Rigging is correct, hang height.
04 Helmet strap is secure
05 Parachute pins are secure and correct
06 Leg Loops secure and correct
07 Battens correct
08 Zippers closed on harness and glider

If aerotowing add these

09 Tow Release correct (weak link not used more then twice)
10 Bridle correct and over the bar
11 Vario is on
12 Nothing dangling
13 Cart correct
14 Wind cycle

If I've missed anything, please post it.
01 Hooked in...
Numero Uno! That's the biggie! Top o' the list, of course. Get that sucker out of the way right now so...

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=811
FTHI
Rick Masters - 2011/10/19 22:47:17 UTC

At that moment, I would banish all concern about launching unhooked. I had taken care of it. It was done. It was out of my mind.
...you can cross it off the list and stop worrying about it.
...(two loops if not using a single riser spec'ed to huge tensile numbers)
Right, never use unbacked up single loops. Those things can only rip your glider apart about ten times over.
02 Beaner locked
And get that beaner locked. If it's not locked the gate can open and you can plummet to your death.
03 Rising and Rigging is correct, hang height.
Big killers right there. You're hooked in and have your leg loops but let's do a hang check to make sure your rising and rigging is OK and your hang height isn't in need of a critical readjustment.
04 Helmet strap is secure
Gawd yes! If you crashed with an unsecured helmet strap you could lose your helmet and you might get seriously hurt. I wish I had a nickel for everyone who's launched with an unsecured helmet strap, crashed, lost his helmet, and been seriously hurt.
05 Parachute pins are secure and correct
Use heavy leechline instead of pins.
06 Leg Loops secure and correct
How many more times are you gonna have that on the list?
07 Battens correct
Curves Forward and Up. F U - try to remember those initials.
08 Zippers closed on harness and glider
Might wanna leave the pod boot zipper open if you're planning on running off a ramp.
If aerotowing add these

09 Tow Release correct
1. Have somebody pull on it while you hit the actuator so you know it will work under load.

2. Make sure the brake lever is securely velcroed onto the right downtube within easy reach and practice swatting it a few times so you know you'll be able to hit it in an emergency situation.

3. Or if you've got a PT signoff that confirms you know how to safely fly Pro Toad just put a bent pin barrel release on your right shoulder and an appropriate weak link with a finished length of 1.5 inches or less on your left shoulder.
(weak link not used more then twice)
Of course not! Whatever piece of fishing line many of us are happy with at any given time you need to make sure that it's something that will break exactly when it's supposed to. If you use it more than twice there's a possibility that you'll be fatally inconvenienced.
10 Bridle correct and over the bar
What's a correct bridle? Any piece of spectra or polypro that some asshole sells you and tells you is a correct bridle? Does a bridal qualify as a correct bridle?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/09 19:46:17 UTC

His bridal was touching is nose wires.
He's severely out of whack.
Seems to be an accepted Industry Standard.
11 Vario is on
Oh my God! I almost forgot to turn the vario on! Then I remembererd that I have people to love after my flight!
12 Nothing dangling
Shouldn't that issue have been covered when you did your zippers?
13 Cart correct
13.5 Florida Ridge runway not anywhere within striking distance of cart
14 Wind cycle
Ninety cross at 15 plus - right before you crumple your neck and the Safety Committee scrubs. But hell, you've got a weak link that's been used no more than twice - so that issue shouldn't be that much of a big fuckin' deal.
If I've missed anything, please post it.
Hook-in check? Just kidding. You've already banished all concern about launching unhooked. You've taken care of it. It's done. It's out of your mind.
Nic Welbourn - 2015/02/16 00:01:18 UTC

What is the function of a hang check?
Something about a weak link?
Well yeah. The hang check is the focal point for preventing unhooked launches and the weak link is the focal point of a safe towing system and keeps you from getting into too much trouble. How ya gonna talk about one and not the other?
I do a hang check where possible, but there is no need because most of the time I connect the harness to the glider while assembling, then I check it as part of my pre-flight checks...
Right. Then you're good to go...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=13359
Today was a bad day!
Mike Bomstad - 2009/08/26 04:21:15 UTC

The harness is part of the aircraft... end of story.
(Just because it's easy to remove, does not mean it should be. Dont choose the path of least resistance)

Attach it to the wing, completing the aircraft.... then preflight the completed aircraft.
Buckle yourself into the cockpit and then your ready.
End of story.
...normally the harness remains part of the glider until I pack up. Some people call this pretty simple idea the 'Aussie Method', but I call it 'setting up a hang glider in most situations'.
I call it a pretty SIMPLE idea from and for incredibly SIMPLE people.
This would be appropriate at almost all launches, people wouldn't kill themselves so much via FTHI (failure to hook in), nor would hang checks need to save so many lives against FTHI.
Name some lives saved against FTHI by hang checks. Name some assholes who found their faces in the dirt because they weren't hooked in who wouldn't have noticed the issue with a preflight turn-around or walk-through or a launch sequence hook-in check.
I don't walk around in my harness because I'd rather be safe than look cool...
Go fuck yourself.
...and it would make my @ss look way too fat.
And match your head.
I shudder when I see pilots walking around the place in a harness for no good reason!
But the ones that DO have good reasons...

http://http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21868
Don't Forget your Hang Check!
Eric Hinrichs - 2011/05/13 21:31:06 UTC

I went to Chelan for the Nationals in '95 as a free flyer. They were requiring everyone to use the Australian method, and you were also not allowed to carry a glider without being hooked in.

This was different for me, I hook in and do a full hang check just behind launch right before I go. I was also taught to do a hooked in check right before starting my run, lifting or letting the wind lift the glider to feel the tug of the leg loops.

So I used their method and I'm hooked in, carrying my glider to launch and someone yells "Dust devil!" Everyone around runs for their gliders (most of which are tied down) and I'm left standing alone in the middle of the butte with a huge monster wandering around. I heard later that it was well over three hundred feet tall, and some saw lightning at the top. After that it was clear that no one is going to decide for me or deride me for my own safety methods, someone else's could have easily got me killed.
...are OK, right? So how are you able to tell the differences? How do you know when and when not to shudder? Or do you just shudder all the time to play things on the safe side and stay in practice?

Ya know when I shudder? When I see some total asshole like this:

06-04213
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7449/13891111960_87d494095e_o.png
Image

about to do this:

09-05019
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2928/13891086719_3ba7e65d38_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2933/14074543322_a183cc3a23_o.png
10-05124

without having bothered to do this:

13-03110
http://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3697/13700915564_87a2a336b0_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2912/13700562685_86575e9220_o.png
14-03129

two seconds prior because he's absolutely positive he did some preflight bullshit like this:

04-03229
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5038/14097754513_33226dd131_o.png
Image

back in the setup area a couple minutes ago. And 'specially at a site at which a guy I'd met and talked to in an effort to help him with some glider stuff ran off the cliff without his glider and got killed right in front of a few dozen glider "pilots".
But it's like a choice to fly PG over HG for reasons of convenience, each to their own I guess.
Fuck you. If it's such a goddam wonderful idea then how come you Aussie douchebags haven't got it in the regs of your Aussie douchebag national association?
michael170 - 2015/02/16 05:38:02 UTC

Interesting that you correlate FTHI with a hang check, 'always the student' Nicos.
Try reading Spark's post a few times and see if anything sinks in.
Good freakin' luck.
Nic Welbourn - 2015/02/16 05:56:48 UTC

Image
Image

Asshole.
Comet - 2015/02/16 06:09:54 UTC

Is this thread about hang gliding or about semantics?
Nah, it's just obnoxious Safety Nazi stuff. Click the bury button and ignore it.
NMERider - 2015/02/16 06:35:01 UTC

Does this mean words will fly? Image
Thanks again, Jonathan.

http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5566/14704620965_ce30a874b7_o.png
Image
Allen Sparks - 2015/02/16 14:38:12 UTC

Image, NME.

All threads eventually become about semantics.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13132
Unhooked Death Again - Change our Methods Now?
JBBenson - 2009/01/25 16:27:19 UTC

I get what Tad is saying, but it took some translation:
HANG CHECK is part of the preflight, to verify that all the harness lines etc. are straight.
HOOK-IN CHECK is to verify connection to the glider five seconds before takeoff.
They are separate actions, neither interchangeable nor meant to replace one another. They are not two ways to do the same thing.
The difference between a hook in check and a hang check is an important one, IMO. :-)...
This will become an opinion issue as soon as we start seeing hook-in checkers launching unhooked.
...due to previous FTHI fatalities...
Dozens of them.
...and my two incidents, in 1976.
Safety Nazi.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=32475
Hang check?
piano_man - 2015/02/17 00:48:55 UTC
Georgia

"What is the function of a hang check?"

A proper hang check should be a weight bearing check; just part of a solid pre-flight routine.
1. So then how come:

- there's never been anything about it in anywhere in the USHGA Pilot Proficiency Program SOPs?

- Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney - jim @hangcheck.com - damn near killed himself and his tandem passenger on an unhooked launch?

- Rob Kells - the Wills Wing sales rep, a friend to every pilot he meets, someone who's never had a negative word said about him by anybody, a factory test pilot, a really anal preflighter - uses them only on rare occasions when he needs to check bar clearance and says they're pretty much useless for anything else?

- Allen Sparks - who dates back to 1976, has had two unhooked launches, one of which came terrifyingly close to killing him, and close friends horrifyingly mangled and killed - doesn't do them and says pretty much the same thing Rob does?

- Jon Orders - who ALWAYS did hang checks as he was required and trained to by the total fucking assholes at HPAC - dropped a passenger a thousand feet and brought a hundred times more global attention to the sport than any other single event in the history of the sport?

2. What's this "weight bearing check" supposed to prove or do for you? Does it ensure that you're properly and safely secured to the glider, haven't missed your leg loops, haven't done a partial with your carabiner? Is there something that it reveals that can't be better and more easily caught with a visual?
A "hook-in check" is to help make sure pilot is attached to the glider.
When's it done? Does Lockout Mountain Flight Park - where I'm assuming you got your ratings - teach anything remotely resembling a hook-in check? Anything at all after the stupid fucking hang check at the back of the ramp?
They both function to help keep the pilot safe and to check equipment is in order.
One of them is a stupid crappy preflight procedure that tells you virtually nothing of any use and the other's the most critical element of your launch sequence. There's a brick wall's worth of separation in the definitions and functions of preflight and hook-in checks. Do try not to blur the distinction.
If you launch off of a cliff without being hooked in, unless you're a gymnast and can do an iron cross ... well, good luck.
1. Can you name a hook-in checker who's ever launched off a cliff without doing a hook-in check?
2. Got a video of yourself doing a hook-in check before launching off a cliff?
3. Have you ever insisted on one of your flying buddies doing one?
4. So it's pretty fuckin' obvious you're not an Aussie Methodist / End Of Story kinda guy. How come?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=32555
Nothing more Sad! R.I.P.
NMERider - 2015/03/02 18:57:58 UTC

Really nice a well-liked pilot and professional as well as family man. Last September I had dinner at his home and met his family and some colleagues. We crossed paths in the sky going opposite direction on New Year's Day. That was the last time I saw him. I spoke with a very close friend of his yesterday afternoon and things will never be the same after this. His passing will affect a wide community.
http://www.keyt.com/news/man-dies-in-hang-gliding-accident/31555834
Paraglider Dies After Falling 3,000 Feet Near La Cumbre Peak | News - KEYT

Paragliders launch 'bout the same as hang gliders do.
- In a bit o' wind the wing's flying and you can feel whether or not you have your leg loops - and abort if not.

- In light air you need to run to get your wing flying / suspension tensioned.

So what's the reason paragliders can't deliberately tension their suspension, JUST PRIOR TO LAUNCH...

13-03110
http://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3697/13700915564_87a2a336b0_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2912/13700562685_86575e9220_o.png
14-03129

...pretty much the same way the dozen or so hang glider people who aren't total morons do? Grab the fuckin' risers and tug.

Obviously nobody's ever gonna do this 'cause - just like in hang gliding - everybody is much happier talking about how horrible the most recent one of these was but I'm pretty sure...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=31781
Another hang check lesson
Alan Deikman - 2014/09/23 19:47:06 UTC

For my part I will just refer you to the classic Tad Eareckson essay which I call "the gun is always loaded" which is a bit overworked but probably all you will ever need to read regarding FTHI. A lot of people will find it gores their particular sacred Ox, but I have never seen anyone point out a flaw in his logic.
...this is the ticket.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=32475
Hang check?
Nic Welbourn - 2015/02/16 05:56:48 UTC

Image
http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=7515
Forgetting to Strap In:Accident Reports+Survival Strategies - new

Fuck you guys too.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Rick Masters: Superiority of Hang Gliders
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=1582
Bill Cummings - 2015/03/04 02:46:28 UTC
man dies in hang gliding accident
http://www.keyt.com/news/man-dies-in-hang-gliding-accident/31555834
But the headline is:
Paraglider Dies After Falling 3,000 Feet Near La Cumbre Peak | News - KEYT
And, anyway, just how much difference did the glider flavor make in this one?

01-30904
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8532/28993414732_0629854fc5_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8394/28993413612_5b4ac915ee_o.png
03-31006

Hey Bob... Must be one helluva turbulent jet stream paragliders hafta raise their wings up into in order to get off the ramp. It totally baffles me how any of them manage to survive more than two or three launches in ridge soaring conditions. Any thoughts?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=8290
I don't care about the flack if this saves one person.
ahurst - 2008/09/03 16:32:40 UTC
Sheffield

As well as the hang check, I check I'm hooked in nearly every time I pick the glider up, by lifting it far enough to feel the straps tighten and stop, and certainly if I'm planning to launch.

I think it's a good idea to learn to associate the holding-the-glider-on-your-shoulders-about-to-run feeling with the straps-tight feeling, even if you then let it drop back to shoulders to start running. Now it feels wrong to me if I am about to launch, but haven't lifted the glider far enough to check it will stop!
Bullshit. All that does is give you a false sense of security.
Matthew Hendershot - 2008/09/03 23:35:17 UTC
Arroyo Grande

This is a new idea to me.
Yeah, you've had great USHGA certified instruction but you've never even heard of the fuckin' Aussie Method. You've never even heard of any advantages to hooking your harness to your glider before entering it in terms of setup and preflight.

What did you got told the purpose of your...

1504
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2831/9623912388_98cf582742_o.png
Image

...spreader was supposed to be?
I'm still a relatively new pilot (about 6.5-7 hours, two mountain flights just last weekend). I was taught NOT to hook in until I was ready to launch. This training taught me to be wary of casually maneuvering the glider in potentially gusty conditions while hooked in.
And you needed to be taught NOT to hook in until you were ready to launch is order to learn to be wary of casually maneuvering the glider in potentially gusty conditions while hooked in? Ten year old kid common sense wouldn't have worked for that?
As a result, I think of hooking in and hang checking as the last things I do before I launch.
Yeah. That's pretty much the same thing that all the assholes who've launched unhooked have thought. And keep on totally fuckin' ignoring...
With each flight, demonstrates a method of establishing that the pilot is hooked in just prior to launch.
...USHGA's hook-in check regulation.
It does seem like some launches that are on a crest could pose a hazard to pilots that are ground handling while hooked in. A strong gust or dust devil could send one over the back--no?
Bullshit. It's a proven fact that the Aussie Method can't give you a false sense of security.
So--I guess it comes down to being able to quickly and easily get in and out of your harness while it's hooked in--so that it can still be the next-to-last thing one does before launch without making anyone else wait unnecessarily...
Fuck everybody else. That's a direct corollary of Aussie Methodism.
I guess I'll be practicing getting in and out of my hooked-in harness and see how it feels.
Idiot.
Mark G. Forbes - 2008/09/04 04:39:13 UTC

It's my opinion that you should re-think this strategy.
And you should always listen to any asshole expressing an opinion, Matthew.
I am not aware of a case yet where a pilot was killed, or even seriously injured, by being attached to the glider while approaching launch.
I am not aware of a case yet where a zebra was killed, or even seriously injured, by approaching a lion and biting one of its ears. Therefore, obviously, it's perfectly safe for zebras to approach lions and bite their ears.
We know of *many* cases where pilots have been seriously injured or (more often) killed by failing to hook in.
1. And that's your choice, Matthew. Either Aussie in at the setup area or seriously risk being seriously injured or (more often) killed by failing to hook in.

2. Bullshit, Mark. Only a tiny fraction of unhooked launches result in significant injuries and fatalities are extremely rare. The last one in the US was Kunio Yoshimura, 2008/08/30, and the last one anywhere was Lenami Godinez-Avila, 2012/04/28. If we killed a lot more people we'd see a lot more people doing hook-in checks.
There was one incident a few years ago where a dust devil caught a pilot who was standing on launch and hurled him over the edge to his death.
Bullshit. 2001/06/16 - Bill Cox - Tularosa - Hang 4 - Dry Canyon. It was a gust front and there were tons of warnings.
This was despite the help of a wire guy, who was unable to hang on as the dusty ripped the glider away from him.
He was a nose guy.
Bill Bryden - 2001/09

One of the witnesses commented that they should always have at least two people for a wire crew. He speculated that if there were a person on each side, instead of only the nose, they would have stood a much better chance of handling Bill's glider in the wind. The other pilots were holding their own gliders behind launch since there were no tie-down stakes or similar provisions. While a couple gliders did get tossed around in the set-up area, they weren't too difficult to control. Unfortunately, this task removed people from potentially being near Bill when his glider was grabbed by the winds.
This incident isn't really relevant, because the pilot was in the ready-to-launch position and had completed his prelaunch checks.
Which is all we ever need to do, right Mark?
It is certainly *possible* that at some site, some day, you might be turned over by a gust or dusty while in the setup area, because you were attached to your glider.
POSSIBLE?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3QcMB2owFc
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3QcMB2owFc[/video]

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
It is far more likely that you will be able to anchor the glider safely because you have weight on the hang strap, which you would not have if you were just carrying the glider around by hands alone.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

So the SMART thing to do is immediately hook in when you see a dustie or gust front about to hit launch. And, of course, make sure you have your helmet on. But that goes without saying - thanks to Bob.
If the turbulence is strong enough to lift you up while hooked in, it's guaranteed to be strong enough to take your glider for a long ride if you're not.
And if you're hooked in and your glider's just going for a short ride you'll have a lot easier time finding it afterwards.
And as I said, I do not know of one instance, EVER, where a pilot was seriously injured by having a hang glider flipped while getting ready to fly.
Well, now, Mister USHGA Treasurer, you know about a Good Samaritan wire assistant having life as he knew it ended by a dust devil spun glider. And who knows? In this particular case it's possible that there'd have been a better outcome if the owner had been clipped in. But it's also possible the outcome could've been worse.

And anybody who thinks that doing anything other than unhooking and heading for the nose in response to a dust devil or gust front within seconds of hitting has got shit spewing out of both ears.
I strongly recommend that you hook in the harness as part of the setup process, then put on the harness afterwards. If you disconnect for any reason, take off the harness, re-attach and re-do the preflight, then suit up again.
Then get it put into the SOPs - motherfucker. And also make sure you delete USHGA's 34 year old hook-in check regulation 'cause that's totally incompatible with your Aussie Methodist bullshit.
Fly safely.
And make sure to keep on skipping those hook-in checks. Remember your only two choices are the minor unproven risks of Aussie Methodism and almost certain death by failure to hook in.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 17:34:33 UTC

Remember, a weak link improves safety.
Say it over and over and over in your head until it sinks in.
Say it over and over and over in your head until it sinks in.
Post Reply