The Bob Show

[Tad Eareckson]

Bob Kuczewski - 2017/05/05 06:50:08 UTC

Mutilation of history often starts with the smallest of steps.

Yeah Bob, all bent outta shape about the mutilation of history entailed in moving two of your four recent unauthorized posts - encompassing 22 of your original sentences - plus six legitimate member responses to a more appropriate topic where they're probably gonna get more attention from more interested readers.

But:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8143/7462005802_bbc0ac66ac_o.jpg


and you don't even acknowledge the totally needless and rather predictable death of one of your loyal Bob Cult zombies until...

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=917
Lilienthal Award

Bob Kuczewski - 2012/09/11 22:28:17 UTC

I was just wandering down memory lane here in the Otto Site Marker forum when I found Terry's post above.

For those who don't know, we lost Terry earlier this year in a towing fatality. I attended his services in Leakey Texas, and I was extremely impressed by the number of people who knew Terry and who appreciated his good nature and spirit.

...five days shy of three months after the fact.

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1081
Platform towing /risk mitigation / accident

Sam Kellner - 2012/06/29 13:59:51 UTC

This topic is generated to better understand safe platform/payout operations.
In accordance with USHPA, the accident report was submitted 6-16, the evening of the accident.

Where that sleazy pigfucker - along with everyone and his dog - knows in no uncertain terms that u$hPa's sleazy corporate lawyer is gonna take one look at it and...

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1081
Platform towing /risk mitigation / accident

Sam Kellner - 2012/07/03 02:25:58 UTC

No, you don't get an accident report.

...shred it - as is made crystal clear in u$hPa's vile SOPs. And that history is gonna die with all the motherfuckers involved with the front end of that clusterfuck operation.

The only flying fuck you give about history is in editing, misrepresenting, distorting it to further your personal agenda which is just about all about advancing the political power of Bob. And somebody please find me an example of Bob being at least partially on the right side of an issue in which that's not happening.
---
2017/05/07 17:00:00 UTC

37 hit increase between this and the previous post in this thread. So much for mutilation of history, Bob.

[Steve Davy]

http://ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=877
Discuss Tad here

The above thread had 4452 views before I read it.

[Tad Eareckson]

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=877
Discuss Tad here

Bob Kuczewski - 2017/05/07 20:06:24 UTC

Cinco de Mayo 2017

This summer will be the 7th anniversary of the founding of the US Hawks. A lot of history has flowed through this site in that 7 years.

In and out with close to zilch in the way of positive impact on anything - and tons of negative.

The sentiments expressed by Warren above are consistent with my own view. I don't wish ill on anyone, including Tad.

But you're totally OK with actually CAUSING it.

And from time to time I stop by his site (kitestrings.org)...

Zack C was the founder and there are several Administrators, Moderators.

...to see how things are going.

How are they going? Any revised thoughts on inconvenience stalls now that the proven system that works has fallen to the Tad-O-Links many of us are now happy with?

I hadn't posted there in years (he's banned me on and off)...

I didn't really ban you on and off. I banned you and later restored your account on the condition that you didn't post as a courtesy. I can't see you ever becoming member material.

...but I recently saw this snippet in one of Tad's posts:

From my perspective the mission of Kite Strings has (d)evolved since its inception over half a dozen years ago. The original goal/hope was to reform the sport. "We" now understand why things are like they are and that reform on any significant scale is not a possibility. I now see the primary mission as doing as much damage as possible to the corrupt commercial motherf***ers who hijacked the sport from the recreational pilot decades ago - and ditto for their enablers (99 percent of current participants).

That post also mentioned that Tad had "entered a phase of serious burnout (and (even more) substantial depression) months ago".

I couldn't help but feel sorry for Tad, and I know how hard it's been to reform the sport of hang gliding

Into what? List some things that you're doing BETTER than u$hPa and the Jack and Davis Shows.

...(believe me, I really know).

The work of a dictator is never easy - or done.

I had originally invited Tad to join us in 2010, but as time went on, his desire for doing damage to 99% of hang gliding participants (the last sentence in his quote) became all too apparent.

- I was a bit slow in picking up that it was 99 percent and that you were a big part of it.

- Oh. So that's why you banned me. And here I was thinking that...

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=884
The Bob Show

Bob Kuczewski - 2011/12/13 05:55:39 UTC

If I boot you permanently it will be due to my concerns over the topic we discussed on the phone. This forum should be a safe place for people of varying ages to visit. You have not given me any assurances that's true with you on this forum.

...it was to make The Bob show a safe place for people of varying ages to visit.

And notice this:

If I boot you permanently...

PERMANENTLY. You've already decided that there's ZERO chance of me reforming my viewpoint, attitude, what-the-fuck-ever to anything that would fall within the confines of the Sterling Bob Show Standards you have for all your members. Life without parole on your say-so alone and without any pretense of a jury or panel. And this because of a fairly happy consensual relationship now over four decades ago - well over half my lifetime in the past.

- So in the course of your near seven year history can you document the visitation of The Bob Show by a single person of a varying age?

- And can you cite any studies confirming that Bob Show inconvenience stalls are as harmless to people of varying ages as they are for people of similar ages?

Even so, and after many years of not posting to KiteStrings, I broke...

...the conditions under which Tad had restored my access to Kite Strings...

...my silence with the following post to that same KiteStrings topic ("open phones"):

The topic is not "Re: open phones, Bob. It's "open phones".

From my perspective...

Yeah, you already quoted that paragraph just above. You don't need to quote your quote of it.

There are many people who want to reform the sport. You've alienated almost all of them ... making the job that much harder.

I don't see how. If I'm alienating almost all people in the sport who want to reform it shouldn't they be flocking to The Bob Show - their only other option - in droves?

USHPA's monopoly is at the heart of the problem. You won't reform the sport until that monopoly grip is loosened. Every time you fire a shot at any USHPA competitor, you also shoot your self (and your goal of reform) in the foot. There's nothing that makes the USHPA insiders happier than seeing their critics fighting among themselves.

Your posting of the Brad Geary frames, on the other hand, was excellent. Thanks for making that major effort.

In short order Tad's gang was on the attack.

Ooh! I've got a gang! Cool!

Even worse, a number of posts (including mine, but not Tad's that I'd quoted)...

The one from two months prior that was a response to an issue Jan raised.

...were moved to another topic ("The Bob Show").

The horror.

This took them completely out of context...

COMPLETELY. There was pretty much no making sense of anything after that - 'specially after he transcribed every other paragraph into Mandarin.

- How the hell was anything taken out of context when:
-- the paragraph you just quoted for the third time was included in your initial post?
-- your statement was perfectly clear as a stand-alone anyway?
-- I documented the history of the transfer?

- Why do you think it is that the two other participants in the relevant discussion - Brian and Steve - aren't similarly all bent out of shape about the obfuscation of their posts? Think they're afraid of being kicked out of Tad's gang?

...and made them very difficult to follow.

- How do you know, Bob? You yourself have just given a detailed accounting of the actions and timeline. Quote some total fucking moron complaining that he's having difficulty following the discussion?

- Let's say there is some total fucking moron too fucking stupid to be able to easily follow the discussion. Do we really want more Sam Kellner caliber total fucking morons participating in the sport and relevant discussions? How many more do you think the sport can withstand?

I protested...

...again in violation of the terms of my access...

...in the original ("open phones") topic:

For the record ... my posts to this topic (which were in direct response to Tad's post above) have been moved to another topic.

Which any interested reader would already know. And fuck any noninterested reader anyway.

Mutilation of history often starts with the smallest of steps.

That post brought this reply from the screen name of "Steve Davy":

"Screen name?" motherfucker? The implication being that it could be / probably is a fake ID?

Post in "The Bob Show" thread if you're going to post on this site, Bob. If you choose to post in any other threads I will kick you out of here.

"Steve Davy" will kick me out of KiteStrings?

Yeah Bob...
- There's more than one individual with powers on par with Tad in Tad's dictatorship.
- "Steve Davy". Probably just some other sock puppet of Tad's.

You were already kicked out of Kite Strings - 2012/05/07 12:38:07 UTC. Talk about taking things out of context? The whole premise of your discussion is grotesquely out of context.

My reply was short and to the point:

Go ahead. Show everyone what this site is really all about.

That's when Tad jumped in with a typically long post...

Yeah Bob:

http://www.kitestrings.org/post10141.html#p10141

Something on the order of a dozen short sentences plus a quote of the "love Bob or leave The Bob Show" segment of your Constitution. Long post. 'Specially for the ten second attention span dregs to whom you cater. Compare/Contrast with the crap you're writing in this one.

...that started out with this:

OK Bob. Done. 2017/05/05 12:11:25 UTC.
...

That's how I was banned from KiteStrings on Cinco de Mayo, 2017.

Fuck you. See above.

If you read the actual topics, it can be a bit hard to follow since the posts had been moved around.

You're LYING.

It's also hard to know if any of the content had been (or will be) altered.

- Why? You can't remember the substance of what you and others said? Maybe you should ease up on the distortions and misrepresentations a bit. Makes it a lot easier when you're being consistently and conscientiously honest and accurate. Ask somebody who is sometime - if you're on speaking terms with any such individuals. Or talk to Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney who did nothing but lie and was caught in so many 180 degree contradictions that he can no longer post anything anywhere.

- If you weren't the sleazy motherfucker we know you to be you'd keep a record of exactly what was said and it would be brain dead easy to detect where typo, spelling, grammar errors had been corrected; clarifications had been made; formatting had been standardized. Then you could go screaming to your douchebag membership about Kite Strings' systematic mutilation of history.

But that's what's happening at KiteStrings.

You got us, Bob. We're always working overtime to cast you in the worst possible light by misrepresenting your statements and actions, obliterating context, altering the historical record. What you've just posted just scratches the surface. You could easily show numerous examples of stuff about which somebody actually gave a rat's ass but you just don't have the time. So just plant the suggestion without the slightest scrap of actual evidence from Kite Strings' archive of over ten thousand posts and walk away.

As I said at the beginning, I do have some sympathy for Tad.

I'm touched. Life without the possibility of parole. Just think how ugly things could get if you DIDN'T have SOME sympathy for Tad.

I've watched you very carefully for a long time, Bob. My take is that you're a sociopath without the capability of having any real sympathy for anyone or anything - 'specially after how you treated Brad Geary and what you assholes did to him. Also life without parole for having violated ZERO SOPs.

He's also trying to reform a sport controlled by the powerful insiders at USHPA.

And what do you think I'm getting out of the deal? What's my motivation supposed to be? Nothing was stopping me from flying all the sites - mostly Woodstock, McConnellsburg - before the now extinct motherfuckers of Highland Aerosports suddenly decided they wanted to make Ridgely a safe place for people of varying ages to visit. I decided then that I never again wanted anything to do with motherfuckers and dickheads that control and populate the sport. So what is it I'm supposed to be deriving from misrepresenting your statements and actions and distorting the historical record?

But we part company...

We parted company fairly early in our relationship in 2011.

...at Tad's need to take pot shots at others who are similarly working for reform.

Backwards reform. Replace u$hPa's elected and voting Board of Directors with Emperor Bob's appointed Fake Board of Directors whose fake votes can be overridden by Emperor Bob at any time for any reason he feels like.

The US Hawks are not Tad's enemy, and I don't see Tad (or KiteStrings) as our enemy.

Thanks for treating me like a friend, Bob.

But somehow Tad can't get past his need to tear us down because we don't agree on everything.

There's pretty much nothing we agree on, Bob. Think of me as the ACLU defending your right to slap on a swastika armband and march down the streets of Skokie, Illinois.

I think that's short-sighted and destructive of the reform efforts in general.

I'm seeing zilch in the way of reform efforts and way less in the way of reform substance.

I would welcome a change, but I'm not expecting it.

- After what you did to me back in 2011? No, probably not a good idea to start holding your breath.

- So you admit to the possibility of a change in THIS regard but five and a half years ago you decided to ban me PERMANENTLY on the premise that I was incapable of any change in your direction.

I don't want to get into a long drawn out discussion about Tad and KiteStrings (there's been enough of that already).

- Yes, I see you haven't played the unrepentant child molester card on this volley. Glaringly conspicuous absence.

- We're having a long drawn out discussion about Tad and Kite Strings and Bob and The Bob Show - AGAIN - because you don't wanna do or say anything that smacks too much of substantive reality.

But I did want to document what's happened...

...and insinuate that other stuff has happened, is happening, will happen...

...so people can get a better view of the sad state of hang gliding forums.

- Rather than send them to the Jack and Davis Shows and all the vile little club dumps like Capitol, Rocky Mountain, Sonoma, Grebloville. They'd really have to go to Kite Strings to get a really good view of the sad state of hang gliding forums. (Notice the way Bob picks his target based on the number of flyers he's gonna be alienating? Tiny handful of posters widely scattered around the planet, lots of them marginalized already anyway.) If we had a just a dozen or two regular participants his tone would change dramatically.

- People who can't be bothered to click over to Kite Strings and get a 100.00 percent accurate view of the sad state of hang gliding forums - people who need a better view filtered by Bob's editing, characterizations, insinuations.

Thanks to Rick for starting this "Discuss Tad here" topic back in 2011.

Yeah Bob...

Rick Masters - 2011/12/05 19:57:42 UTC

If everyone who wants to discuss Tad will do it here, it will make the forum available and useful to any of us who have Tad on ignore.

I have found that I tend to visit US Hawks a lot less when every topic is saturated with long and sometimes offensive and discourteous posts by someone I have no interest in reading. It's a shame to let the forum be destroyed this way - especially when the forum plays such an important role in the formation of the US Hawks right now. If folks would just post their responses to Tad here, I really think it would help US Hawks move forward.

I have no intention of participating on this topic. The room needed a trash can, that's all.

Of course, I may be alone on this. This may be the Tad Fan Club. If so, disregard this note.

And do say hi to Rick for me while you're relaying my message that he can suck my dick.

When I went looking for a place to put this recent news, I searched for "Tad" in topic titles (titles only). Here's what I found:

- Tad's nightmare post (tough on server) by Bob Kuczewski - Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:05 pm

Deliberately offensive title. The stuff in parentheses was amended after my complaint and still implies that that Yours Truly did something inappropriate. It was a software bug that made life miserable for Yours Truly. The server suffered zero frustration and loss of useful lifespan.

- Input from Tad please. by Bill Cummings - Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:58 pm
- Discussion with Tad about Towing / Foot Launch by TadEareckson - Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:53 pm

Bob's title - not mine. Didn't like it then and don't now.

- Perpetrates the stupidity that the flight mode - free or tow - can be divined if one knows the launch method.

- I don't like discussions WITH anybody who's supposed to be a revered expert on something. I like discussions of issues amongst reasonably competent participants.

- Tad Eareckson ...an ongoing project by Nobody - Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:42 pm

The title isn't "Steve Davy"'s. It's a quote from Joe Faust.
- I don't wanna be an "ongoing project". The stuff that I've developed should've been implemented decades ago.
- Joe Faust:
-- did nothing to oppose your sleazy banning of me
-- was a member of the Fake Board which rubber stamped its approval of your sleazy banning of me
-- has NEVER fought worth a damn for implementation of anything I've developed

- Discuss Tad here by Rick Masters - Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:57 pm

Suck my dick here, Rick and Bob.

- Tad Towing Winch Kingsville by DarthVader - Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:53 pm
- Tad by DarthVader - Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:07 pm
- Complaints about Tad by Jacmac - Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:36 am

Spoof.

- Review of Tad Eareckson's Ban from US Hawks by Bob Kuczewski Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:06 pm

- Bullshit farce.
- Suck my dick, Bob.
- Fuck y'all who went along with that obscene charade of a pretense of process.

Somehow the one titled: "Discuss Tad here" was as appropriate as I could find.

Goddam right, Bob. I DO find it totally infuriating.

Thanks Rick.

Intelligent, polished, moderately articulate version of Trump. One of a kind in the history of hang gliding. MASSIVE waste of time cracking his code / documenting his pure unadulterated manipulative bullshit. So frustrating because there’s never a trace of any honest dialogue - says NOTHING that he hasn't predetermined will be useful for some self empowering objective. Don't EVER start feeling relaxed in a discussion with this motherfucker. He's a real master of saying things that sound like what it is you wanna hear while in effect saying nothing of committed substance at all.

Gawd how I miss Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney. Tried to play a similar game but didn't have the brains, memory, vocabulary, political calculation skills of a halfway intelligent kindergartener with fetal alcohol syndrome. Couldn't get out more than a sentence and a half without shooting himself in a foot.

No response to his post over there as of this one. Guess they all have figured out that there's no substance to anything he's saying. 4473 hits at the moment.

[<BS>]

"We" now understand why things are like they are and that reform on any significant scale is not a possibility.

And the utility of those quotation marks could not be made more obvious.

[Tad Eareckson]

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2624
President Trump

Brian Scharp - 2017/05/09 16:29:28 UTC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaHwlSTqA7s

Bob Kuczewski - 2017/05/09 18:24:41 UTC

There's something about humor that bypasses the rational part of the brain.

1. Not much harm done with respect to the hang gliding crowd then. Not likely any measureable effect.

2. Sure, Bob. Everyone knows that. People are always saying, "Boy. There was something about that humor that bypassed the rational part of my brain. This is always happening to me. I really need to find out what that something really is so I can start compensating for it and processing my world view more accurately."

Profanity can have a similar effect.

Can you cite any studies or is this just more stuff you're pulling outta your ass and presenting as knowledge so common and fact so obvious that no citation is needed? (Rhetorical question.)

Both can be used as tools to plant incorrect ideas in the minds of others by skirting the brain's critical thinking and filtering capabilities.

1. Sure Bob, 'cause you say so.

2. And I shutter to think where The Bob Show would be without critical thinking and filtering capabilities.

3. I guess that's the reason we don't see you ever using humor or profanity on The Bob Show. You're being extra conscientious in making sure that all your output is properly channeled through the rational parts of your readers' brains and minimize the possibilities of incorrect ideas being planted.

4. And the reason that we don't ever see any video clips of individuals using humor and profanity to discredit any of Trump's opposition is because his supporters are all way too forthright to stoop to the level of using it to plant incorrect ideas in the minds of others by skirting their brains' critical thinking and filtering capabilities. (Gawd. Just think of all the humor and profanity we must be missing.)

Whenever you see someone relying heavily on humor or profanity in their arguments, it's good to ask why they can't make their case with logic alone.

1. RELYING heavily on humor? What's a comedian SUPPOSED to rely on in doing his job? Poetry? Synchronized swimming? Quantum physics?

2. Profanity? Get used to it motherfucker. The Fifties were over a long time ago.

3. ARGUMENTS? Stephen isn't ARGUING anything. He's presenting video clips, audio recordings, quoted text from this psychopath you assholes put in the White House and commenting on them.

The answer is often that they have no case with logic alone.

But often they DO have a case when logic is supplemented by humor and profanity? That sentence makes no fucking sense whatsoever.

And what assholes so many of us are to have been watching Stephen Colbert all these years while totally failing to understand the deceptive nature of his performances.

I'm not saying that humor is bad.

And you're grouping it with profanity so you also must be not saying that profanity is bad.

It's one of the many joys that are given to us on the buffet of life.

'Cept on The Bob Show where it's virtually nonexistent. 'Cause good humor just about always has a foundation in truth.

But beware when it's being used to persuade people in matters where logic is the better tool for finding the truth.

Like in the video Brian just posted. There's just so much planting of incorrect ideas in the minds of others by using humor and profanity to skirt the brain's critical thinking and filtering capabilities that I don't even know where to begin in pointing out the glaring examples. So I won't.

[Tad Eareckson]

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2624
President Trump

Brian Scharp - 2017/05/10 14:39:31 UTC

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-has-a-dangerous-disability/2017/05/03/56ca6118-2f6b-11e7-9534-00e4656c22aa_story.html
Trump has a dangerous disability

George F. Will - 2017/05/03

It is urgent for Americans to think and speak clearly about President Trump's inability to do either. This seems to be not a mere disinclination but a disability. It is not merely the result of intellectual sloth but of an untrained mind bereft of information and married to stratospheric self-confidence...

...Americans have placed vast military power at the discretion of this mind, a presidential discretion that is largely immune to restraint by the Madisonian system of institutional checks and balances. So, it is up to the public to quarantine this presidency by insistently communicating to its elected representatives a steady, rational fear of this man whose combination of impulsivity and credulity render him uniquely unfit to take the nation into a military conflict.

Bob Kuczewski - 2017/05/10 17:43:52 UTC

Donald Trump was the "Hail Mary Pass" of voters who were desperate to escape the "business as usual" grip of both parties.

Indisputable fact. Emperor Bob knows the thought processes and mindsets of all of the 63 million individuals who walked into voting booths on 2016/11/08 and pulled Trump levers.

He was more of a "third party" candidate than a member of the Republican establishment. His genius...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22660
What can be learned from this "scooter" towing accident?

Mitch Shipley - 2011/01/31 15:22:59 UTC

Enjoy your posts, as always, and find your comments solid, based on hundreds of hours / tows of experience and backed up by a keen intellect/knowledge of the issues when it comes to most things in general and hang gliding AT/Towing in particular. Wanted to go on record in case anyone reading wanted to know one persons comments they should give weight to.

...was in recognizing that a third party candidate had no chance, so he had to take over one of the two major parties.

And won by a landslide with a -2.9 million popular vote margin over Hillary. And just think of the margin he'd have had minus all those untold millions of fraudulent Hillary votes. (The US Union of Fraudulent Voters only permitted its members to vote for Hillary.)

This really bugged most of the "establishment Republcans", and many became the "Never Trumpers". George Will was one of the early "Never Trumpers" and his ego is on the line.

Only time will tell if our gamble on the "Hail Mary Pass" will be a game-winning touchdown or an incomplete pass (maybe an interception?). Right now, the ball is still in the air.

Nah, we're good now. The negative majority is getting what it asked for.

Thanks for your quotes of George Will. While I don't agree with them, they do a good job of supporting your case.

You don't agree with Tad's strong weak link theories either. Funny you never seem to get into any solid discussions - the kind devoid of subversive humor and profanity - supporting any of your cases. And it's ALWAYS because you know if you ever say anything of any actual substance you're gonna alienate a number of individuals who would otherwise be inclined to support your dictatorship.

[Tad Eareckson]

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2624
President Trump

Bob Kuczewski - 2017/05/11 18:18:33 UTC

There will, no doubt, be a relentless stream of anti-Trump media available for posting.

So how come you're not posting any of the available relentless stream of pro-Trump media to illustrate what a load o' shit all this other humor and profanity laced crap is?

It will be a combination of opinion, news, and the new term "fake news".

None of it will, of course, be FACTUAL. The video and audio clips in which we see and hear Trump lying his ass off and boasting about serial sexual assault are all quality computer generated fabrications.

You can see that mix already shaping up in this topic.

Just no mix including exculpatory stuff.

Only time will tell if Trump's leadership improves our country - or the opposite.

If that motherfucker ends up in prison for a few thousand consecutive life terms his leadership could have something in the way of silver lining.

As far as I can tell, he's been working to accomplish the things he promised.

Yep. Global warming is now officially a Chinese hoax.

We won't be in a position to judge his presidency for some time yet.

Who's "WE", motherfucker? You don't seem even to have a single other Bob Show sycophant giving you any covering fire on this one.

But the daily spin cycle of talking heads and classroom clowns can't wait for that.

Yeah, let's shut all the fake media down for the next twenty years so's we can get a really great hindsight view of this constitutional crisis mushroom cloud.

They've got to have something ready for their deadline every day. The show must go on.

What an off-the-scale incredible fucking dickhead. Can't tell you how happy I am that you made yourself so visibly in alignment with this psychopath. Reminds me of the way Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney put all his eggs in the standard aerotow weak link basket and how devastatingly that blew up in his face on the afternoon of 2013/02/02.

You're now in as untenable a position as you've ever been in your life, Bob. And Kite Strings is gonna work overtime to do to you now what it did to that little freak a bit over four years ago.

P.S. Bob...

These "classroom clowns"...



...are funny - and EFFECTIVE - 'cause they're brilliant, well educated and informed, and are working from a foundation of truth. Nobody's laughing at any pro Trump faction jokes 'cause there aren't any 'cause there can't be - mathematical impossibility. You're not funny 'cause you can't be 'cause your foundation is pure unadulterated rot.

[Tad Eareckson]

Hey Bob...

Here's one of your professional class clowns:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWAu5ax0NSw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2pfvY7hBNI


addressing the relevant issues in a stunningly unhumorous and unprofane manner. Wanna point out the many problems with the logic of his arguments for us? Take you're time and make it a real accurate and thorough response.

[Tad Eareckson]

Check out the chronology:

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/faq.php
Frequently Asked Questions

What will keep the US Hawks from becoming another USHPA or HGAA?
You will ... hopefully. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Everyone has to do their part once in a while. If you see something that's not being done correctly, then it's your duty to speak out.

How will the US Hawks try to be different from USHPA or the HGAA?
The US Hawks will try to be more of a grass roots organization - more like the start of hang gliding. There's nothing wrong with the strong central control exhibited by other organizations, but the US Hawks will appeal to pilots who want more local control and greater personal participation in decision making. We believe that good decisions sometimes require a significant effort to dig into the facts. Sometimes arguments are heated, and that's not something to be feared or rejected. That's the process - painful or not - that leads to better decisions.

Is there a Board of Directors for the US Hawks?
Not yet. The HGAA's early problems arose because different people wanted to take the organization in different directions. That created power stuggles which cost the HGAA some of its early leadership. For now, I'm going to take the US Hawks in the direction that I believe is right. If people want to go along, then they're welcome. If not, there are at least two other alternatives.

This was undoubtedly chiseled in granite the nanosecond The Bob Show began going active.
- We know Bob is so anal about site history preservation that he starts frothing at the mouth whenever anyone fixes a typo.
- Nobody's fixed a typo in this one since I first read it 2011/02/11.
- It would be a MAJOR PROBLEM for Emperor Bob if he made an unannounced substantive modification.

First Bob Show post:

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1
Hello US Hawks!!

Bob Kuczewski - 2010/08/13 21:40:09 UTC
San Diego, CA

The US Hawks Hang Gliding Association is being founded to give pilots yet another choice in national organizations.

This topic was started on Friday August 13th, 2010, and it's intended to be a topic where new members can say "Hi" to introduce themselves.

So if you're a new member of the US Hawks, please make a post to this topic telling us about yourself. And if you have any problems, please feel free to send me a "personal message" (PM) or give me a call at 858-204-7499.

Thanks,
Bob Kuczewski
---
Contributor
Joined: 2010/08/13 21:40:09 UTC

Note that the post time stamp is IDENTICAL to the joined time stamp.

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=21
Official US Hawks Membership List

Bob Kuczewski - 2010/10/10 05:46:01 UTC

Tentative Official US Hawks Membership List

Here's my own tentative US Hawks membership list by screen names:

1 bobk
2 wingspan33
3 redsagebear
4 Dennis
5 JoeF
6 Free
7 OSCAR

Please let me know if anyone has any problems with this list.

Yeah, the first two are total assholes.

If I don't hear any complaints by Monday August 29th, 2010, then I'll make it official.

Sure Bob. I'm just wondering how you expect to get a response by 2010/08/29 to a 2010/10/10 post. You guys all Time Lords?

If you go to the subforum in which this appears it looks like it was actually posted 2010/08/24 19:06:48 UTC. (Makes a whole lot more sense that way).

Anyhow... The above list by "joined" time stamps and actual identities as best as I've been able to determine:

1 - 2010/08/13 21:40:09 UTC - Bob Kuczewski (bobk)
2 - 2010/08/14 03:24:33 UTC - Scott C. Wise (wingspan33)
3 - 2010/08/14 22:00:16 UTC - Sara Martin (redsagebear)
4 - 2010/08/15 05:21:42 UTC - Dennis Duvall (Dennis)
5 - 2010/08/14 22:41:20 UTC - Joe Faust (JoeF)
6 - 2010/08/18 03:47:13 UTC - Warren Narron (Free)
7 - 2010/08/22 07:05:41 UTC - (OSCAR)

Last seen on The Bob Show dates for the small half of the above:

2010/12/11 19:34:58 UTC - OSCAR
2011/03/08 00:55:29 UTC - Dennis Duvall
2012/06/25 21:04:56 UTC - Sara Martin

(And Sara's a suicide the following summer.)

So if you go back to the Mission Statement when Emperor Bob is telling everybody about what "WE" believe, think, have as values there are no members beyond himself and he doesn't know who any will be - let alone what they'll believe, think, have as values. So he's starting off at Square One with an outrageous lie.

And I took the bait. ASSUMED that there were a dozen or so guys getting a well intentioned reform movement off the ground and good with Bob at the wheel for the launch phase. Heard what Bob wanted me to hear and dismissed the stuff that should've been setting off deafening alarm bells. But that was when I was just beginning to understand sociopaths and recognize their ticking patterns.

Frequently Asked Questions

You haven't launched the forum yet, Bob. Just how frequently can all these questions have been asked and how have all these people been able to ask them?

What will keep the US Hawks from becoming another USHPA or HGAA?
You will ... hopefully. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.

And if you're still reading and taking this sociopath seriously at this point you've totally flunked the aptitude test.

Smart move, Bob. Reminds me of the Nigerian 419 Scam. The scammer identifies himself as a Nigerian Prince because that filters out everyone who isn't an off the scale total moron and eliminates the bandwidth and effort that would be wasted on individuals with at least partially functional brains.

Everyone has to do their part once in a while.

But not like every waking minute. If you read on below you'll note that, for now, Emperor Bob is going to take the US Hawks in the direction that he believes is right. And so there's hardly any possibility that you'll ever need to do your part. And, hell, even if you do it won't ever accomplish anything.

If you see something that's not being done correctly, then...

You can go fuck yourself.

...it's your duty to speak out.

Then what happens, Bob? What's the procedure for altering or amending the SOPs? And oh, by the way, where ARE the current SOPs and who participated in drafting them?

How will the US Hawks try to be different from USHPA or the HGAA?

Emperor Bob will be in total control from now until the end of time.

The US Hawks will try to be more of a grass roots organization - more like the start of hang gliding.

1. How long will it try before it realizes how much it's wasting its time and says, "Fuck this!"?

2. What the fuck do you know about the start of hang gliding? I was there from the early Eighties on and have a pretty good hindsight understanding of what was going on and it's not very pretty.

There's nothing wrong with the strong central control exhibited by other organizations...

I like that, Bob. And since for now (2017/05/12 02:52:35 UTC) you're going to take the US Hawks in the direction that you believe is right, it would be counterproductive / a totally moronic waste of time to have anyone else in the organization with any actual options for control.

...but the US Hawks will appeal to pilots who want more local control and greater personal participation in decision making.

So at the local level - Southwest Texas for example - you can do whatever the fuck you want to whomever the fuck you want. While at the national level you can have greater participation in decision making but at the end of the process there's only one individual who will ever have an actual vote.

We...

First person singular.

...believe that good decisions sometimes require a significant effort to dig into the facts.

And "we" also believe that once a significant effort has been made to dig into the facts any that are found to be incompatible with the direction Emperor Bob believes is right (whatever Emperor Bob believes is best for Emperor Bob) the facts will be dismissed as "fake news" and the diggers will be told to go fuck themselves.

Sometimes arguments are heated, and that's not something to be feared or rejected.

Instead, Emperor Bob will lock anyone who heats anything up down in his Basement - for about a month - on the pretense of conducting a scientific experiment to determine whether or not that action has a positive effect in terms of the number of posts made by douchebags in Emperor Bob's corner.

That's the process - painful or not - that leads to better decisions.

But since (see below) Emperor Bob is going to take the US Hawks in the direction that he believes is right you'd hafta be a total moron to waste your time with this sociopath fighting for any better decisions.

Is there a Board of Directors for the US Hawks?
Not yet.

2017/05/12 02:52:35 UTC.

The HGAA's early problems arose because different people wanted to take the organization in different directions.

And only one of the different directions was Bob's and Bob was the only one who wanted to take it in that particular direction. So that was obviously going nowhere fast.

That created power stuggles...

I so do hate power stuggles.

...which cost the HGAA some of its early leadership.

Mostly the ones who weren't able to stuggle very well.

For now...

2017/05/12 02:52:35 UTC.

...I'm going to take the US Hawks in the direction that I believe is right.

Oh good. That should take care of any power stuggle issues. I was so afraid there was a possibility of having heated arguments that might lead to the making of better decisions.

If people want to go along, then they're welcome.

With the understanding that damn near all the answers to the questions people were frequently asking above are actually total bullshit and just posted for the purpose of misleading individuals into thinking they were getting into a BETTER situation than they had had before.

If not, there are at least two other alternatives.

THREE - motherfucker. And THIS ONE has your number and you have SO set yourself up.

[Tad Eareckson]

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2624
President Trump

Bob Kuczewski - 2017/05/11 18:18:33 UTC

There will, no doubt, be a relentless stream of anti-Trump media available for posting. It will be a combination of opinion, news, and the new term "fake news". You can see that mix already shaping up in this topic.

Only time will tell if Trump's leadership improves our country - or the opposite. As far as I can tell, he's been working to accomplish the things he promised. We won't be in a position to judge his presidency for some time yet.

Yeah Bob. It'll probably take about twenty years before we'll be able to accurately assess the success or failure of the Trump presidency - starting at its conclusion (hopefully two or three weeks from now).

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25656
The young girl who died hang gliding solo

Jim Rooney - 2012/03/06 18:34:14 UTC

ND's onto it.

No one ever wants to wait for the accident investigation... they want to know "NOW DAMNIT!" and there's always a lot of self-serving arguments surrounding it.

And it's always the same.
The same damn arguments get drug up every time. And they're all just as pointless every time.

We have a system in place.
It works.
Let it work.

Our procedures are well established at this point in time and there are no gaping hidden holes that need to be addressed immediately.

RR asked what the status was.
ND's provided the answer (thank you).

Please take a deep breath. And wait.
Accident investigations involving fatalities take a long time. And by long, I mean they can take years.
(yes, years, I'm not kidding)

The sky is not falling.

But the daily spin cycle of talking heads and classroom clowns can't wait for that. They've got to have something ready for their deadline every day. The show must go on.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/skysailingtowing/message/7067
AT SOPs - proposed revisions

Tracy S. Tillman - 2009/05/10 02:08:52 UTC

Additionally, if you want to really present a convincing argument, you should also: (a) get other experts to co-sign your letter, such as those who have some or most of the aerotowing-related credentials listed above, who have been doing this for many years with many students, and who support your argument; and (b) present reliable data based on valid research showing that there is a significant difference in safety with the changes that you recommend. Supportive comments from aerotow experts along with convincing data can make a difference. Otherwise, it may seem as if your perception of "the sky is falling" may not be shared by most others who have a wealth of experience and who are deeply involved in aerotowing in the US.

So it would be really irresponsible for any of us to be commenting on any of these issues as they're hitting the daily news cycle - 'specially for his supporters. So you should probably just stop responding to posts about him in your Basement - 'specially Brian's.

(Hope everybody was able to catch tonight's Stephen Colbert installment.)