Weak links

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2859
Towing safety
Jiri Stipek - 2005/06/29 08:11:57 UTC
Australia

Daniel,

I support your view on a weak link. Unlike most of the physics related problems, this is purely a personal opinion and open to discussion.
Bullshit. Aside from color schemes for your wing, EVERYTHING in these sports is a physics related problem - NOTHING more so than the weak link issue. Anyone and everyone with a goddam personal opinion on this needs to be stood up against a wall and shot for the greater good.
I noticed, actually, more people are starting to question the importance (or even the wisdom) of having a weaklink (at least the 100 dN or so) lately.
Don't worry, they'll all fall back in line soon enough.
Fact: A broken weak link is one of the most common causes of injury in towing.
Yeah.
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson
How much longer do you think it'll take for this basic common sense concept to start sinking in?
Question: "What does the weaklink protects you against?"
It doesn't protect YOU against ANYTHING.
Tost Flugzeuggerätebau

Weak links protect your aircraft against overloading.
It protects YOUR AIRCRAFT against OVERLOADING. PERIOD.

Now how 'bout we start working on how we can equip people who blow launches to abort tows so they don't hafta wait around for their weak links to blow while they're being dragged?
Answer: "Hard to tell."
No it's not.
Tost Flugzeuggerätebau

Weak links protect your aircraft against overloading.
It's astoundingly EASY.
The most serious danger in towing is a lockout.
No it's not.
The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release.
You JUST SAID:
Fact: A broken weak link is one of the most common causes of injury in towing.
Lockouts can be avoided and managed through glider control and tow tension reduction. When a fuckin' Hewett Link blows...
Donnell Hewett - 1980/12

Now I've heard the argument that "Weak links always break at the worst possible time, when the glider is climbing hard in a near stall situation," and that "More people have been injured because of a weak link than saved by one."
...which it WILL DO at the WORST POSSIBLE TIME, when the glider IS CLIMBING HARD IN A NEAR STALL SITUATION - you are SCREWED. Your driver and thrust are out of the picture and you can't do shit until the glider starts flying again. And, unless you're nice and high, the glider WON'T start flying again.
During lockout the tension stays the same or even drops.
It usually goes up. But not that fast and not that much and - yes - it can even drop.
If the weak link breaks eventually, it is due to pilot pulling brakes in panic, not really due to the fact a lockout took place.
It breaks if/when the tension reaches its strength. That's about all you can predict about what's going on when it does.
How else can weaklink save your day?
It's not there to save your day. It's there to...
Tost Flugzeuggerätebau

Weak links protect your aircraft against overloading.
...protect your aircraft against overloading.
In my view, only to protect your glider against a structural damage.
Lose the "In my view" part.
But this danger is well beyond the limits our "standard" links are set for.
WHOSE "STANDARDS"? Based on WHAT? Stuart's and Mark's OPINIONS?
Some 400 dN would be probably when we should start to worry. Weaklink of such a strength would break only in exceptional cases of a winch (or the operator) going crazy or a sudden gust of a monstrous proportions. That would make sense.
This is the Paragliding Forum. Just how much good do you think making sense is gonna do?
In all other situations, severing the line should be left to either the pilot or the winch operator.
- What? Take the decision making authority away from a little piece of fishing line and give it to people watching and assessing the situation? Are you out of your mind?!?!?!

- Let the guy whose ass is on the line (literally) be the one to make that call.
No need to say, the winch should be fitted with a reliable line cutter and the operator should be a highly qualified person, preferably with some kind of license.
If he's highly qualified he won't have someone up on the other end of his line who needs him to use the very reliable line cutter.
His role is as important as the one of the pilot - if not more so.
It usually isn't but it sure can be - as or WAY MORE.
If we like it or not, we are most of the time in the operator's hands - almost being in the role of passengers.
So how would you feel about being in the hands of THIS:

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3600
Weak link question
Jim Rooney - 2008/11/24 05:18:15 UTC

Gee, didn't think we'd have to delve into "pilot in command"... I figured that one's pretty well understood in a flying community.

It's quite simple.
The tug is a certified aircraft... the glider is an unpowered ultralight vehicle. The tug pilot is the pilot in command. You are a passenger. You have the same rights and responsibilities as a skydiver.
It's a bitter pill I'm sure, but there you have it.
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
weak links
Jim Rooney - 2007/08/01

Whatever's going on back there, I can fix it by giving you the rope.

It's more of this crappy argument that being on tow is somehow safer than being off tow.
Jim Rooney - 2007/07/22 22:30:28 UTC

I've heard it a million times before from comp pilots insisting on towing with even doubled up weaklinks (some want no weaklink). I tell them the same thing I'm telling you... suck it up. You're not the only one on the line. I didn't ask to be a test pilot. I can live with your inconvenience.
...total fucking asshole?

How would you like to fly:
- at the tow operations that rated him?
- ANYWHERE in a country with a national organization that allowed that total fucking asshole to get rated?
Passing a significant part of the role of the operator to some piece of string simply doesn't work.
Yeah. What really works well is supplementing the piece of string with another flimsy worn out piece of string at the other end of the line and some brain damaged piece of shit with his hand on a lever at all times ready to make a good decision in the interest of your safety.
In my opinion it causes more damage than benefit.
Work on this until it becomes something more that just your opinion.
Take it or leave it - this is what I think.
Doesn't matter what you think. We've got the physics, numbers, reports, videos, crashes, and fatalities to confirm it. It was blindingly obvious to the culture in 1974. But that's never seemed to make much of a dent on either in the field practices or national policy.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2859
Towing safety
Mads Syndergaard - 2005/06/29 09:51:21 UTC
Denmark
Jiri Stipek - 2005/06/29 08:11:57 UTC

If we like it or not, we are most of the time in the operator's hands - almost being in the role of passengers. Passing a significant part of the role of the operator to some piece of string simply doesn't work. In my opinion it causes more damage than benefit. Take it or leave it - this is what I think.
AHA! Just thought this little snippet justified a look at the Skynch:
http://www.skynch.com
where the pilot and the Tow Tech are one and the same - you may still have problems, but you have only yourself to blame. :-)
So you guys can figure out how to operate a winch for yourselves with both hands on the controls at all times but not how to blow yourselves off tow with both hands on the controls at all times. Great. Glad to see you have your priorities in order every bit as well as hang gliding does.
I generally tend to agree that weak links are just another hazard in a long line of other hazards, but Stuart's post has made me reconsider somewhat.
Too bad Jiri's post didn't make you reconsider totally.
However some/most of the problems which for Stuart advocates the use of weak links can be solved by having better procedures, i.e. never hook into the tow line until the field is clear, the towing mechanism is ready and the pilot is ready to launch.
Careful. You're getting perilously close to the edge of the slippery slope of competence advocacy.
Dunno why you all seem to dislike "static" line towing so much? We use cars equipped with pressure gauges...
- So you have a number to look at to make assumptions about what the glider SHOULD be doing rather than looking at the glider itself to see what it's ACTUALLY doing.

- If you're talking static (fixed length) line you may have a pressure gauge but you're using it as a tension gauge.
...a pulley so that the car drives towards the pilot, and that elastic waterski-like line that someone mentioned above.
Polypro. So you have a gauge to SEE the tension but not much in the way of ability to actually CONTROL the tension. Great.
In my opinion...
Oh good. An opinion. I can hardly wait.
...it works a song!
In the opinions of damn near all the fucking assholes who aerotow hang gliders, 130 pound Greenspot works so well for weak links that we dare not mess with success by experimenting with...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 08:24:31 UTC

I use what we use at the flight parks. It's time tested and proven... and works a hell of a lot better than all the other bullshit I've seen out there.
...any of the other bullshit they've seen out there.
Gusts/thermals are all but absorbed by the elasticity in 1000+ meters of nylon line - great!
Yeah. The energy which would otherwise be going to lift the glider is now absorbed by the elasticity and dissipated as heat. Great!
Other than the Skynch I cannot think of any other means of towed launch that gives such smooth, controlled tows (and I have done a fair few of tows - in the thousands).
- Yeah. It's "smooth". So what?

- No. It's NOT controlled. Ever see a ten year old kid flying a stunt kite with nylon control lines? Pull on one and not much happens when you want it to happen. And then a bit later something really ugly can happen when you really don't want it to happen. Elastic lines store energy and sometimes give it back at really inconvenient times.
(Static is in quotation marks above because in other forms of rope-speak a static line is one that doesn't stretch, whereas the tow line - and method that I advocate stretches like a MoFo...)
In the US it's used to mean fixed length (versus being reeled in and/or paid out) by convention.
Roger Wolff - 2005/06/30 07:24:03 UTC
the Netherlands

Stu,

You've seen: "excessive towforce -> Accident" so you conclude: "we need to prevent excessive towforce -> weaklink".

Your whole argument is based on the assumption that excessive towforce needs to be prevented. This is not the case. Accidents need to be prevented.
- Couldn't have said that much better. ('Cept I'd have used "crashes" instead of "accidents" 'cause I've seen more evidence of the Easter Bunny in the back garden than I have accidents in glider towing.)

- Stu hasn't actually mentioned any incidents clearly involving or precipitated by excessive tension.
Now, some people have seen weaklinks breaking and causing accidents. (Example: Hans Dekker tried to take off during the Dutch Open Flatland Competition last year, and when his force-limited release decided to release for him he dug into the ground. Luckily no injury.)
That's good. Nobody got hurt, the paragliding community got a valuable lesson for free, and minimum allowable break points were established by all the national regulatory organizations and agencies.
So the issue is always a tradeoff.
There is no tradeoff. You set the fuckin' weak length to blow a reasonable bit before the glider starts getting damaged and you've got a pilot to make decisions about when to stay on or get off.
Almost all of the reasons you state causing excessive towforce and possible injury are things that I don't see happening at our tow operation. We have other methods in place to prevent them from happening. One of the main differences between our towing operations is that you have "moving vehicles" involved. We have a static winch.
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

A weak link is the focal point of a safe towing system.
So you would be in favor of having competence as the focal point of a safe towing system?

Your ideas intrigue me. Please tell me more.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2859
Towing safety
Stu Caruk - 2005/06/30 09:44:56 UTC

towing

Interestingly, the type of winch appears to me to be of little consequence. The worst potential for injuries that I have seen was when a truck drove over a line running from a scooter tow winch to the pilots and drug it off. It was spooling line rapidly off the scooter, the winch operator wasn't close to the winch, he was chasing after the vehicle to get them to stop. I happened to notice what was going on and ran towards the pilot on tow trying to get them to pull the release whilst grabbing my trusty pocket knife.
- And the reason you're not telling us what YOUR STUDENT was using for a weak link is because he WASN'T using a weak link. Right?

- So do we get to hear how things turned out or do we hafta tune in to next week's episode?
- Did our hero get the student to pull the release or did he hafta cut the line with his rusty - sorry - TRUSTY pocket knife?
- Or was his trusty sidekick Robin able to stop the truck?

- Had Batman instructed the pilot to pull the release thingy when it was obvious that the tow was going south and not likely to turn back any time soon?

- Had Batman equipped the pilot with a release which would allow him to reliably end such a tow?

- What weak link rating would you suggest we us to protect against scenarios involving lines rapidly spooling off of winches?

- So how many of your students have your weak links spared from subsequent incidents like that one?
Second scariest would be a scooter tow with almost all the line out and a pilot who launched and for some reason was very uncomfortable, reached for and pulled the release but never insured the line had released (it hadn't) then turned downwind peeling line off the drum until it hit the end of the spool. Fortunately the line was attached to the spool with a light weaklink which broke to prevent things from going really bad.
- Meaning that - again - there was no weak link on the student.

- Maybe he was very uncomfortable because hadn't been trained adequately to be operating at that level?

- And he very obviously hadn't been properly equipped to be operating at that level.

- Why was he using a release:
-- that he had to REACH FOR?
-- which wouldn't blow AFTER he REACHED FOR and PULLED it?

- Why wasn't he adequately trained to verify the disconnection before turning?

- What load was the release rated to handle?

- With a light weak link on holding the end of the line on the drum what was the maximum loading to which that release could've been subjected?

- What the fuck is a "LIGHT WEAKLINK" and how "LIGHT" does it need to be to prevent things from going:
-- really bad;
-- moderately bad;
-- acceptably bad;
-- hardly bad enough to be worth mentioning?

- So what would've happened if there had been a line dig and all the line didn't pull off?

- So what would've happened if the towline had snagged on something?

- Did you read about the 2011/01/15 Shane Smith fatality?
Stu Caruk - 2005/06/28 21:03:57 UTC

They provide even less protection from a line jam during the downwind phase of a step tow.
- I'm having a little trouble resolving those two statements.
3rd was a pilot who continually locked out on tow from side to side behind our boat...
So you were towing someone who couldn't fly.
...forcing us to reduce the line tension and end up with a ridiculously shallow line angle.
Maybe that would've been a real good time to just continue reducing line tension.
In the turn they...
At what point in the tow had the tow become a tandem?
...of course cut the corner to let the line go slack which forces us to run like mad and rewind the line to keep it out of the water. Snagging the line on a saialboat mast or other boat is a distinct possibility...
- If you had ended the tow when you should have there'd be a whole lot less line to worry about.
- Maybe people incapable of conducting a safe controlled tow operation shouldn't operate around other vessels.
The real problem occured at the top of the tow when the pilot release (some $15 POS... so what if it doesn't work, it was cheap!) failed to function.
- But you decided to use your boat to tow him up ANYWAY.

- So you've got a fifteen dollar piece of shit release that doesn't work at normal release tension and you're not using a weak link to limit the load going to it.

- Oh well...
Stu Caruk - 2005/06/28 21:03:57 UTC

If you carry a hook knife, which all paraglider pilots should, I'd find it hard to find a malfunction you can't solve.
...I'm sure you insisted that both of them carry hook knives so that shouldn't really have been a problem.
They freaked...
They FREAKED? BOTH OF THEM? Keeriste. If they had just remained calm and used their hook knives!
...held onto the brakes and tried to separate the release.
- Was one working the brakes while the other tried to pry and/or hack the release open?
- Do you just have people show up at the dock and say, "That looks like fun! Can I give it a try?"?
Ever see a 1 1/2 turn spin with the pilot on tow....
- Sounds like they had the wrong person on the brakes.
- Did you cut speed and tension to help them out?
...followed by the pilot running downwind...... eeeek.. Actually to be fair, a weak link wouldn't have helped here...
- Whereas properly rated and configured weak links would've eliminated all the problems and dangers of the other two incidents.
- That's alright. I really enjoyed hearing the anecdote. Most amusing.
...unless we hit the sailboat mast with the towline...
- So how many Gs do you use to make sure that nothing bad happens to anybody or anything when you hit a sailboat mast?
- Damn those sailboats anyway. Always rocketing across your stern at thirty knots oblivious to everything that's going on.
If it can happen when towing, you can bet at some point it surely will...
- Especially when you've people who can't fly and/or have total shit equipment trying to go up and unprofessional, irresponsible, negligent, clueless douchebags running stuff on the surface.

- All of those situations were inexcusable on your part, Stuart. And I don't even hear you admitting any errors of judgment or accepting any responsibility for ANY of that crap.

- So what you're saying is that it's just inevitable that a tow operation is gonna have a situation in which killing somebody is a pretty good probability.
...and pretending (hoping) that it never will is a silly idea at best.
You mean like YOU'RE about to start doing when you dismiss high tension situations at launch as products only of incompetent tow operations and not worth considering with respect to the weak link rating issue?
We need to be proactive.
Some of us HAVE BEEN proactive - for a LONG time. But we always tend to get drowned out and overwhelmed by the shit happens crowd.
We need to look to our fixed wing bretheren...
Paragliders ARE fixed wing aircraft.
...and observe why the safety record is so much better for the airlines then private aviation.
Standards, training, enforcement.
The answer is simple, they are required, and actually plan and brief for a malfunction on EVERY takeoff.
Yeah. Like...
- You're twenty feet into launch.
- You get slammed by a thermal and pitched so you're standing on your tail.
- Your three quarter G weak link blows.

What's the best way to hit the ground to best absorb the impact and yield the greatest odds of long term survival?
They assume something will go wrong and have a plan to deal with it.
Did they do a scenario with a shitheaded tow operator in the equation?
They don't skimp on safety equipment.
Yeah. They find any three quarter G weak links, they swap them out for half G weak links. Nothing but the BEST!
Towing is a well accepted practise in aviation, and yet in the US EVERY towing activity requires a specific waiver, and EVERY towing activity also requires a weaklink to be used.
Maybe if they didn't require a weak link to be used...
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson
they wouldn't require specific waivers either.
Ever wonder Why?
No.
Tost Flugzeuggerätebau

Weak links protect your aircraft against overloading.
It's a pretty fucking simple issue.
I'd tend to dispute that lockouts are the worst thing that can happen with towing a paraglider.
Quite right.
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson
Lockouts don't hold a candle to weak link induced stalls.
I've towed hundreds of inexperienced pilots and while watching a paraglider pilot start to lock out and head off the towline is an annoyance, it's not much of a big deal in my opinion. With a hang glider,, sure as skippy, it's a hugely big deal and likely to go really bad, really quick, but we're not taliking about towing hang gliders here are we...
The issue isn't primarily paragliders versus hang gliders. The issue is that most hang gliders are aerotowed and the tension CAN'T be reduced quickly or to any extent usefully enough to help out the glider.

But even then... Dangerous low level lockouts in hang gliding are so rare as to be virtually nonexistent - especially when you compare the volume of what aerotow operations pump through to what paragliders are putting up. And furthermore, we could pretty much totally erase them with better release equipment than the tow cartel allows people to use.
With a paraglider, if the pilot starts to diverge from the towline it's a relatively simple matter for the tow tech to reduce line tension and allow the pilot to fall back under the canopy or make it easier for the pilot to correct back on course. If the pilot doesn't correct, it's pretty simple to adjust the line tension to keep the problem from getting worse, and if the pilot fails to correct you can further reduce the tension and land the pilot. It's only a real issue of they are over water and you don't want to get them wet.
That's not that big of an issue - especially compared to what we hafta deal with.
Lockouts though aren't really a tension control issue, they are more of a heading control issue. It's unlikely that a weaklink will break soley because a pilot locks out (although I've seen them break after the pilot hits the dirt and is being drug by the tow tech) in fact it's likey that a weaklink won't break because the force won't be high enough (This also makes the case to not use them to prevent a lockout kind of mute as well though... what can they hurt here?)
Here's how they hurt...

The motherfuckers who run this sport tell everybody:

http://www.wallaby.com/aerotow_primer.php
Aerotow Primer for Experienced Pilots
The Wallaby Ranch Aerotowing Primer for Experienced Pilots - 2012/04/18

If you fail to maintain the correct tow position (centered, with the wheels of the tug on the horizon), the weak link will break before you can get into too much trouble.
so people all fly with standard aerotow weak links thinking that they'll compensate for their piece of shit releases so, not only do we kill the same number of people in lockouts, but have so many stalls and crashes that they're considered routine nonevents and - in the serious ones - attributable solely to inadequate piloting skills.
This is by the way one of the reasons we REALLY like a tow assist style bridle, and frankly we now require them to be used, unless the pilot has demonstrated their ability to launch cleanly in no wind without the device. The issue with lockouts is really most prevalent where the pilot uses an older style bridle without an assist. The glider never comes cleanly overhead unless the pilot really puts in the effort on launch. So the pilot comes into the air with the glider hanging well back and perhaps off to the side. Unless the glider is going perfectly straight, it's going to head off to the side, and because the pilot is pulled well out in front of the glider, it will take a huge correction on the pilots part to bring the glider on a more appropriatte heading. If the tow tech adds more tension at this point there is a very good chance the weak link will break.
Shithead.
THis is really BAD.
Duh.
The pilot will then pendulum backwards and pound in on their (hopefully used) back protector. If they're a little higher, the glider will surge, and the pilot will pound in on their face. A wee higher and a full frontal is possible. A lucky pilot will damp the surge, flare and land. The WRONG response from the tow tech is also to dump all the tension at this point.
And fear not! The weak link would never make a WRONG response in this situations. Weak links are INFALLIBLE. Just ask Doctor Hewett.
Tyically the pilot is pulled a bit off to one side, and in addition to the problems above they will swing sideways back under their canopy as they pound in.

Not good eh!

With a tow assist, the glider comes cleanly overhead in the first place, so it's easy to make a course correction. Secondly if the glider diverges say to the right, the assist automatically trims the glider faster on the right and helps make the correction. I often see things going bad, and know that as long as an assist device is being used I can add tension, and literally drag the glider into the direction I need the pilot to go. That's also the technique used in towing Sheba the wonderdog. She can't make a course correction, but her tow bridle can do it for her.

Without an assist device it's a whole lot more work. I'm not going to say it's impossible to lock out a glider with an assist device, although I will say I've towed some pretty lame pilots who do nothing to make a correction and are way, way off tow.
WHY are you towing pretty lame pilots who do nothing to make a correction and are way, way off tow?
By adjusting the line tension I can easily balance the tow force to keep them in the air maybe even climbing slowly while they work to get things straightened out. If they are over the water, I've seen the glider go almost 90 degrees off tow, and literally towed the glider sideways for a while till things got sorted out. You just can't go near that far over the dirt though.

LOckouts are not IMHO a terrible risk with a paraglider.
So with tow assists and people working things well on both ends of the line, light weak links aren't really a problem.
OVERTOWING A GLIDER OFF LAUNCH AND BUSTING A WEAKLINK is FAR more likely and FAR more dangerous. It places the glider in a unusual flight configuration with the possibility of a great surge with not enough altitude to recover. I don't care how good a pilot you are. If you have enough energy applied before the weak link busts, and you're too low, the results won't be pretty.
So we've got:
It's unlikely that a weaklink will break soley because a pilot locks out...
and
OVERTOWING A GLIDER OFF LAUNCH AND BUSTING A WEAKLINK is FAR more likely and FAR more dangerous.
So Stuart... THINK. The weak link is very UNLIKELY to blow when it would be highly advantageous to be off and very LIKELY to blow when coming off is extremely dangerous.

So should we be dumbing them down in hopes of making them more effective lockout protectors or beefing them up to make them less effective stall catalysts?
So now you have to think to yourself. Since the really dangerous point is right off launch with insufficient altitude to recover you want to ensure a couple things.

First, as a pilot I would like the tow tech to use the minimum force necesary to get me airborne reducing the potential for a problem.
Yeah. First reduce your thrust at takeoff so you don't take a chance of damaging your lockout protector. Brilliant.
I want to do my part to ensure my glider is cleanly overhead by doing an aggresive launch and I want to be assisted into the air, not yanked off my feet. This means I really need to do my part.
But ONLY because you don't wanna stress your lockout protector. Otherwise you'd just waddle into the air any way you could.
I assume the tow tech will try to kill me by over towing me, so I make every effort to get my foot on the speed bar immediately after launch and before I sit down (heck, I never sit down fro 50 feet or so because if the weak link brakes, things will happen so fast you won't get on your feet).
Do you assume your lockout protector will try to kill you by blowing when your tow tech is trying to kill you by overtowing you and do anything to reduce that threat level? Just kidding.
I assume that ther will be a line dig, line jam, some sucker will drive over the line, etc.

Stuff happens though so lets face it. Right after you lauch, somce sucker on a jetski will cut off the boat driver and they will be distracted momentarilly and not look at you the pilot. The scooter tow operator will sneeze and jam the throttle, the throttle on the winch or boat will jam wide open. you name it, it will happens, and right about that time you will trip and fall on launch.... something that just never happens. If you WISELY used a wek link, it will be a non event.
Of course it will.
- What's a wise rating for a wek link that'll turn all this stuff into a nonevent?
- Why should we be listening to recommendations on wise wek link ratings from somebody who can't even spell wek link?
You will fall, get drug a ways, and the link will bust.
- What's the farthest you can get drug an a three quarter G weak link before it busts?
- If you had a release actuator in your teeth how far would you get drug?
- How often have people been drug at your operation?
- How often have people been drug at your operation when the assholes on the ground were doing a halfway competent version of their jobs?
- Do you have guillotines on any of your equipment?
If you've run really hard on launch, are standing upright in youir harness, you've used an appropriately sized weak link and the link breaks, you will experience a minor surge, hopefully flare and land.
You are so totally full of shit, Stuart. I sure wish you wrote a lot less.
If you have no weaklink, somethings got to give and if it';s an 1100# towline (the minimum recomendation for safely towing a paraglier BTW) you can get drug a long ways, or you will have a wicked surge.
NO. Something DOESN'T *HAVE TO* GIVE. Even if the asshole on the upwind end tries as hard as he possibly can he'd probably be unable to MAKE something give on a bet. So how 'bout just shutting the fuck up?
I simply for the life of me can't fathom towing without a weaklink.
You don't have a snowball's chance in hell of beginning to fathom the sole purpose of a weak link. And if you don't have a clue what the purpose of a piece of towing is you have absolutely no fuckin' business towing anything or anybody - including yourself - anyway.
As a USHGA tow supervisor (just a shmuck that can issue tow administrator, tow tech, and TL endorsements)...
Great. Thank you once again, USHGA.
...I side with USHGA which requires the use of weaklinks for ALL towing operations.
- Why am I not the least bit surprised.
We need to look to our fixed wing bretheren...
- Do you also side with USHGA's departure from the rest of fixed wing aviation in which only top end values for weak links are specified - even though you're starting to get a slight clue that it's the bottom end where there REAL problems are?
Now this of course I'll admit means spit in the US, since we don't need to comply with this or be USHGA pilots to tow (unless we are flying under the USHGA tandem waiver) it comes from years of accumulated experience and a standardized training regimine.
And if you are USHGA you're perfectly free to ignore and/or make up whatever rules you feel like anyway 'cause no matter how many people you get killed with by violating the regulations no one will ever hold you accountable for anything.
I look back to the weird days when we started towing. Glider lines were stretching, pilots were pounding in, waeklinks...
Yet another entertaining spelling of the word. Ya know... anal and asshole don't mean the same thing.
...were rarely used becasue they were understood, we slingshot paraglider pilots into the air, sometimes using polypro or nylon to try to dampen out the surge (whilst actually ensuring an almost impossible means of accurate tension control, and guranteeing a bucking bronco ride aloft)...
Precisely. Wanna have a few words with Mark Stucky on this issue?
...and compare it to the ridiculously simple graceful means we have of towing aloft today... I don't want to go back there.
I'm not following you here.

- You used to blast gliders into the air with rubber bands with crappy tension control and no weak links but the only problem you were having was having the glider bounce all over the sky as you climbed out.

- Then you went to Spectra and got everything under control.

- Except your releases were/are crap so you couldn't blow tow on your decision when you fuck up a launch and are getting dragged.

- So you then added three quarter weak links which you felt would blow you of before you got dragged too far and introduced the issues of three quarter G weak link failure and the ensuing stalls.

Can you see where I'm going with this?
Pervious posters are 100% correct.
Pervious posters CAN'T be one hundred percent correct - by definition. (I love that one.)
You can go to different areas of the country and see vastly differnt towing practises. Things are gradually being more standardized and safer as more tow pilots travel around, and current techniques and equipment are adopted.
Bullshit. It's a race to a totally homogenized bent pin bottom.
I love all the history the hang glider pilots have taught us.
You would.
I just wish that many pilots would quit trying to tow paragliders the way we've towed hang gliders for years. Towing a paraglider is NOTHING like towing a hang glider.
Bullshit. The principles of towing paragliders, hang gliders, sailplanes, and ten year old kids' kites are IDENTICAL.
Paragliders don't need high line tensions to launch...
Most of the time - no. But that don't make it a great idea to flush the option down the toilet.
...we don't wan't anything to do with stretchy spongy springy towlines...
Talk to Mark.
...we really don't have pitch control...
Sometimes one point aerotowers don't have what they really need either.
...so tow assist bridles are very helpful...
We call them two point aerotow bridles.
...and weaklinks are ALWAYS a good thing to have in the system.
You shoulda shut the fuck up while you were still sounding halfway intelligent.
For all the arguements against them, why not just toss in say a 250 or 300 pound link.
Yeah. Sure.
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson
Let's just toss something in that'll probably blow when we get dragged to compensate for our shit releases.
You should never see anywere near that tow force.
Nah. The only ways you could see anything like that kind of tow force would be if...
I assume the tow tech will try to kill me by over towing me, so I make every effort to get my foot on the speed bar immediately after launch...
- the tow tech tries to kill you by overtowing you before you can get your foot on the speed bar;
I assume that ther will be a line dig, line jam...
- there's a line dig or jam;
...some sucker will drive over the line, etc.
- some sucker drives over the line;
Right after you lauch, somce sucker on a jetski will cut off the boat driver and they will be distracted momentarilly and not look at you the pilot.
- right after you launch, some sucker an a jet ski will cut of the boat driver and he and his brand new clone will both be distracted momentarily at you, the pilot;
The scooter tow operator will sneeze and jam the throttle...
- the scooter tow operator will sneeze and jam the throttle;
...the throttle on the winch or boat will jam wide open...
- the throttle on the winch or boat will jam wide open;
...you name it, it will happens,
- you get gusted or hit with a thermal or dust devil.

Hard to imagine any of those sorts of things happening and the glider pitching up thirty feet off the deck and overloading a THREE HUNDRED POUND weak link.
Sure, you need to change them after every 3 or 4 tows (QUIT WAITING TILL THEY BREAK YOU CHEAP BOZOS) but they are so cheap it's worth changing every flight.
Yeah, now that Stu has pulled a number or two out of his ass with no fuckin' clue as to what he's talking about and zilch in the way of grade school logic or common sense, you'll be just fine with them as long as you CHANGE them every three or four tows (YOU CHEAP BOZOS).
As a pilot I almost always carry my own weak link and tie on a new one rather than use the shabby old weathered piece of shoelace that's been installed for the last year.
You're not a PILOT, Stuart. A PILOT knows what the fuck he's doing and talking about You're not even a qualified tow operator - nowhere even close. You're a dice roller.
Maybe it's because I'm the fat guy that breaks the links... maybe it's because they never get changed that they break, and at the worst times.
Donnell Hewett - 1980/12

Now I've heard the argument that "Weak links always break at the worst possible time, when the glider is climbing hard in a near stall situation," and that "More people have been injured because of a weak link than saved by one."
Maybe it's because they're below what would be legal for sailplanes and under half what would be safe for paragliders. Shithead.
Towing is IMHO...
Oh good. More of your OPINION. And just when I thought you were all out.
...one of the safest means of getting aloft in a paraglider.
Could be fifty times as safe if the people who were running it weren't a bunch of morons.
It's as safe as you want to make it though, and weaklinks should make things safer not more dificult.
Yeah. Anybody gets killed at your operation it's not gonna be as a consequence of anything you told or sold him or did to fuck things up at the other end.
On the flip side though I know people will always skip this important safety deveice.
I wish.
I make my living dealing with this mentality.
You make a killing when you write this crap and people trust you.
I get to do a service call in the morning for a company that kept blowing the 30 amp fuses on a machine. After blowing half a dozen fuses (which cost $4.67 each after all) they replaced the fuses on each of the 3 legs of 480 volt 3 phase AC power supply with short pieces of copper water pipe. Those cheap fuses protected several thousand dollars worth or motors, drive amplifiers, and H bridge assemblies, which sadly the copper pipe (I'm guessing they would blow at probably 1000 amps or more) didn't protect.
- How many amps would it take to blow your glider and how many amps is the fuse you're using on it?

- If the navigation system in your cockpit normally draws 18 amps but occasionally draws 22 and the manufacturer specifies a 30 amp fuse, how great an idea is it to use a 20 amp fuse and try to fly through a mountain pass in a blizzard?

- Shithead.
I get to make lots of money on their stupidity.
And hospitals and funeral homes make lotsa money on YOUR stupidity.
With a paraglider, the weaklink works like a similar fuse. It's designed to break before catastrophic damage can occur. Removing it allows what should be a minor incident to potentially be catastrophic. The only difference is the guy getting rich if we're lucky will be the surgeon. If we're unlucky it could the mortician.
Shithead.
If you've got a bad weak link break incident that doesn't involve a hang glider (we all know that's very bad on launch after a lockout especially), or doesn't involve overtowing I'd love to hear about it and a pure rational explanation as to why weak links are so dangerous.
- So now we can take items "a" through "g" out of the equation 'cause they're no longer compatible with the two numbers you just pulled out of your ass.

- Your so far beyond the reach of rational explanations that it melts everybody's circuitry down just thinking about it.
Fortunately everybody is entitled to do what they want.
Always a good thing in aviation - especially when other people's asses are on the line. I'll tell Jeremiah Thompson's family hi for you.
They can tow with or without weaklinks, unless or course they come towing with us. We clearly see the benifit of weaklinks...
- Who the fuck is "WE", Stuart? How come the rest of US aren't in this conversation speaking for themselves?
- People who use that pronoun are usually liars. (Bob - for example - is hugely into that pronoun.)
- If you so clearly see the benefit of weak links, how come your explanation of them to us sounds like snow job and demented babbling?
...and tow assist style bridles, and require their use (as well as life jackets for over the water) at all times.
Get fucked.
If your local towing group still insists on the need for huge towline tensions on launch...
- So the only way you'll be able to experience huge towline tensions on launch - even once - is if your local towing group INSISTS on them.

- Who are these local towing groups who are insisting on these huge towline tensions? Are we hearing complaints about them on the forum. Or are they just fictitious products of your fevered imagination like the clueless pilots we have in hang gliding who get killed because they try to save bad situations instead of blowing tow at the first sign of trouble?
...and you're having problems breaking weaklinks I'd love to invite you to call us if you happen to be near Ridgefield, WA. We'd love to have you come out and tow with us, or arrange to tow with one of the local schools that teach by using tow launching as their principle means of instruction. you can find us through http://www.TowMeUp.com
Yeah, TowMeUP - the Western Hemisphere's last word on paragliding weak links. See them emerge fresh from Stu's ass.
Tow high
Stu
Yeah. And make sure nothing unusual happens before you get there.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2859
Towing safety
Tony Adams - 2005/06/30 16:11:48 UTC
Santiago

Brilliant article Stu.
Yeah. Something that long from somebody who tows that much and builds that many winches has just gotta be brilliant.
Stu Caruk - 2005/06/30 09:44:56 UTC

If you have no weaklink, somethings got to give and if it';s an 1100# towline (the minimum recomendation for safely towing a paraglier BTW) you can get drug a long ways, or you will have a wicked surge.
Why is 1100 pounds the minimum?
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"Never take your hands off the bar." - Tom Peghiny
"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson
- It's a remnant from the days of hang gliding when there were enough people developing things and thinking for themselves that common sense still had a place in the picture.

- If it says eleven hundred pounds as a MINIMUM you might do well to think about the possibility that somebody understood that rope breaks and premature releases were extremely dangerous.
We started towing with a cheap 300 pound polypropilene line and it went fine because it was one huge weaklink.
And the PRECISE number that Stuart pulled out of his ass for the really heavy gliders. This has just gotta be divine inspiration.
It did cut a few times but no bit deal.
- It broke when YOU DIDN'T WANT IT TO.

- It prevented you from accomplishing your goal of getting the glider to altitude.

- It put the glider in or a lot closer to a STALL.

- It necessitated an emergency landing, some wear and tear, rewind, gas, time, and an unnecessary and potentially dangerous relaunch.

- And you continued to used the SAME CRAP which you knew wasn't up to the job. (A ten year old kid with a kite wouldn't make that mistake more than about once.)

- These are ALL BIG DEALS.

- And you really oughta be considering the possibility that whoever wrote eleven hundred pounds knew what he was talking about better than the idiot you're talking to now.

- And even though you had those failures at five hundred feet when the gliders were high and in good shape and they didn't appear to you to be big deals, you need to consider a less benign scenario in which your one huge weak link...
Donnell Hewett - 1980/12

Now I've heard the argument that "Weak links always break at the worst possible time, when the glider is climbing hard in a near stall situation," and that "More people have been injured because of a weak link than saved by one."
...breaks at the worst possible time, when the glider is climbing hard in a near stall situation 'cause that's EXACTLY when you can predict that you're most likely to experience a catastrophic failure.

- What you're doing is EXTREMELY dangerous.

- And I don't just mean listening to a total moron like Stu.
Tony Polypropilene
Well, you can listen to him on towline material anyway. Lose the stretchy stuff too.
Andreas Gazis - 2005/06/30 16:32:25 UTC
Aveiro, Portugal

Similar story here.

Bored pilots (me and a friend) sitting on a beach, another pilot goes by on a boat. We decide to tow a tandem (with single pilot, easier to get airborne). I go get some rope, making sure it's not too strong since of course there's no weak link, or quick release or anything of the sort.

Boat pulls, tandem rises, boat pulls to the side faster than pilot corrects and gives full power (driver didn't know shit about towing and I wasn't on the boat), tandem locks out.

I could picture in my head the following seconds, ending in a bone crunching impact (glider hadn't gone over the water yet) but then the rope cut.

Simple, beautiful, pilot didn't even have to try to release (which would probably save him as well).
Did he die? (Sure sounds like it.)
Mike Dufty - 2005/07/01 08:29:35 UTC
Western Australia

Really good post Stu, I've put a link to it from our local towing forum.
- Just what Australia really needs. Oh well, at least he isn't Davis.

- Did you notice that he'd have been real hard pressed to get out of the third grade with that writing? Do you really wanna be basing your procedures on advice from someone who doesn't give a rat's ass about appearing that stupid - even if it weren't obvious that he doesn't have a clue what he's talking about and was just pulling numbers out of his ass with absolutely NOTHING in the way of a sane rationale?
deltaman
Posts: 177
Joined: 2011/03/29 11:07:42 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by deltaman »

http://naughtylawyertravels.blogspot.fr/2012/04/aerotow-batics.html
Jamie Shelden - 2012/04/14

Aerotow-batics

Here's a very interesting little video of my tow yesterday evening at the Florida Ridge. The comp started today (task canceled, high wind), but I wanted a quick practice tow before things started.

By way of background, I was on my glider, with my harness and release and all of my usual equipment and VG settings - nothing new at all. The wind had been quite strong all day, but mellowed slightly in the evening. It was blowing probably around ten miles per hour and there were storm cells out in front, but not moving in quickly. The idea was to have a quick tow to two thousand and then come in and land before the closest cell arrived. Glen had gone up ten minutes before and there was almost no lift, so he came down and landed as I was taking off.

I've been aerotowing for nearly fifteen years and I don't ever recall getting more than ten degrees or so out of line from the tow plane - when I have (even the slightest bit), I'm a big chicken and immediately release. I'm definitely not one to keep trying to get the glider back into line if things get off line at all. I prefer to just release and have another go. The weak link didn't break - I released on the second oscillation.

So, with that background, I would welcome any comments/thoughts on what may have happened here, because I don't really have a clue, other than to say that I had a serious PIO problem. The thing that bothers me most is that I've never done anything even remotely close to what I did last night and I would love to know how I could have screwed it up so badly.

Mostly, I'm just happy to still be here. ;-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27yFcEMpfMk
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Jamie Shelden - 2012/04/14

I've been aerotowing for nearly fifteen years and I don't ever recall getting more than ten degrees or so out of line from the tow plane - when I have (even the slightest bit), I'm a big chicken and immediately release.
PURE UNADULTERATED ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT, Jamie. Did you read what you JUST SAID?
I released on the second oscillation.
You said you released ON THE SECOND OSCILLATION. You do EXACTLY what everybody else does - or tries to - when you launch. You try to control things as best as you can and if you start locking out you get off as quickly as possible and hope you have enough altitude to recover from the ensuing stall.

And I'd actually call that the THIRD oscillation. And you had plenty of opportunity to blow tow when you were headed into the pretty significant second oscillation and you were pretty late into the third when you finally got off.
I'm definitely not one to keep trying to get the glider back into line if things get off line at all.
Bullshit. Are we looking at the same video?
I prefer to just release and have another go.
Unlike all those assholes your instructors told you about who prefer to just continue the lockout and die.
The weak link didn't break...
- You must've been using one of those stronglinks about which we're constantly being warned.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 21:40:25 UTC

It's only a mystery why people choose to reinvent the wheel when we've got a proven system that works.
It's a total mystery why people choose to reinvent the wheel when we've got a proven system that works.

- And you're mentioning the fact that the weak link didn't break because all your asshole instructors told you that its primary purpose was to prevent lockouts - and it didn't.
I released on the second oscillation.
You RELEASED?

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14230
pro tow set-up
Ryan Voight - 2009/11/03 05:24:31 UTC

It works best in a lockout situation... if you're banked away from the tug and have the bar back by your belly button... let it out. Glider will pitch up, break weaklink, and you fly away. Instant hands free release Image
Why didn't you just do what the pros do?

Speaking of releasing... Which Lockout Mountain Flight Park release were you using?

The old spinnaker shackle job?

http://vimeo.com/31463683

password - red
http://vimeo.com/17472603

password - red
http://vimeo.com/40757858

password - red
4:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pC1yrdDV4sI


Or the new improved one?

http://vimeo.com/26212486

password - red

Oh well, it really doesn't matter. You've got a backup release, weak link, hook knife and plenty of time and altitude.
So, with that background, I would welcome any comments/thoughts on what may have happened here, because I don't really have a clue, other than to say that I had a serious PIO problem.
Other than:
- to say that you had a serious PIO problem?
- your serious PILOT INDUCED OSCILLATION problem, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy your flight?
What other comments/thought on what may have happened here do we really need?
The thing that bothers me most is that I've never done anything even remotely close to what I did last night and I would love to know how I could have screwed it up so badly.
I dunno... Maybe the problem is that you're HUMAN?

Fly with the best tow equipment you can find and if you're low enough that it matters use it on the way back from the first oscillation or IMMEDIATELY after you max out the second.
Mostly, I'm just happy to still be here. ;-)
Yeah. Meaning you're smart enough to understand that if that had happened a couple of feet lower than Holly altitude you might not be.
David Glover

Looks like maybe you held each correction too long then there was a lag and then just overcompensated. Move a bit less earlier.
But in any case, pilot control on launch is really no big fuckin' deal anyway.
Hang Gliding - 1998/02

The Wallaby Ranch Aerotowing Primer for Experienced Pilots

by Austin Scott Collins, USHGA Aerotow Pilot. Based on instructional information developed by David Glover and Malcolm Jones, USHGA Advanced Tandem Instructors.

A weak link connects the V-pull to the release, providing a safe limit on the tow force. If you fail to maintain the correct tow position (centered, with the wheels of the tug on the horizon), the weak link will break before you can get into too much trouble.
She has a standard aerotow weak link connecting her V-pull to her release providing a safe limit on the tow force. So if she fails to maintain the correct tow position (centered, with the wheels of the tug on the horizon), the weak link will break before she can get into too much trouble.

Right Dave?
miguel - 2012/03/01 19:27:14 UTC

A reasoned response is called for.
What do we get?
Invective and call the guy a fuckin ass hole.
That's the ticket!
Can ya maybe see where I'm coming from a little better, miguel?
Hadewych

I've done that, especially on a Litespoort, even though I usually tow well, like you. I think once you start oscillating uncomfortably, and you've got just that little bit of extra stress (stormcells looming, jetlag, slight suspicion you might be a bit rusty) plus strong winds, it all adds up and the oscillation can only get worse.
It can get better, but it's pretty tough to make yourself stop trying to fix the problem so hard.
On the upside, you reacted exactly right, that's your experience working too (not only when towing goes perfect I mean).
- WHAT:
I've been aerotowing for nearly fifteen years and I don't ever recall getting more than ten degrees or so out of line from the tow plane - when I have (even the slightest bit)...
...EXPERIENCE?

- Lot's of these things have JACK SHIT to do with EXPERIENCE - and EVERYTHING to do with equipment, judgment, and reaction time (often in that order).

- She most assuredly did NOT react exactly right. She'll need to react a lot righter if she gets into another situation a lot lower.
Glad you and Damien are OK.
Yep, things were looking real dicey for the Dragonfly for a while there. Good thing she was using a standard aerotow weak link.
Frnandu

Is it possible you flew into the Dragonfly's stream?
Not after they had climbed out.

She rolled to eighty, dude. Wake doesn't do that to gliders. It's just a bit of barely noticeable buffeting. If wake COULD cause something like that we'd kill somebody about two out of three launches.
Anonymous

I only have a couple years towing experience but it appears that the tug climbed rather quickly...
Yeah. It was at the end of a day when the competition was blown out after the wind had "mellowed slightly".
...and your position became low...
Not enough to matter.
...and perhaps put you in the prop wash as a result.
No. She didn't control the glider.
It seems that you were pushing out (which was needed)...
It's NEVER *NEEDED*.

- It's a REAL BAD idea to push out early in the tow - ESPECIALLY when your flying a bullshit standard aerotow release.

- The tug should NEVER outclimb the glider.

- If The tug DOES outclimb you pull in and wait for the motherfucker to remember he's got a glider back there and get back down to resume doing his job.

- She's not pushed out anyway.

- By the way... Did you read this:

http://www.ushpa.aero/advisory.asp?id=1
USHPA - Safety Advisory #1
This was the common belief that when a glider gets low on tow the pilot can safely push out and let the glider climb up to the level of the tow plane safely because the glider will not stall under tow.
advisory?

- Or did you read this crap:
The pilot fails to anticipate the tug's quick climb-out after launch, gets low, and then doesn't push out far enough to climb up. Remember: it is almost impossible to stall under aerotow. The induced thrust vector makes the glider trim at a higher attitude. It is OK to push way out; you will climb, not stall.
from David Glover and Malcolm?
...in an attempt to get back into position which then gave you a low airspeed and thus lower control.
If a glider's low on tow he IS in position. It's the tug that needs to get back in position.
Combine all of these effects together and it is clear that you made the proper choice to release.
Not as soon as she should have.
Thank you for posting the video, it is a good reminder that things can change very quickly within those first hundred feet of tow.
Like that one? You'll LOVE this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_n5B3-MIC4
"Anonymous"

Hi Jamie,

There is a man, Tad Eareckson, who was banned from all fora who explained many times that you have nothing to expect from a weak weaklink close to the ground except problems with bad failures but nothing against lockout before it becomes really bad.. As you observed the only thing that can help you is a good release with two hands on the controlbar whether in two or even one point AT.

Weaklink is used to protect from overloading (glider and release).

Your friends said good things about PIO, maybe you should pilot more with your feet or hips rather than shoulders that are in better position in the middle (torque issue).
I think that issue is way too minor to be worth much mention on this one, Anonymous.

Real nice find, by the way. This is THE smoking gun for all the "release at the first sign of trouble" assholes. (Can we do anything about the resolution?)
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/16.078
The Rob Kells Meet
Davis Straub - 2012/04/18 15:02:09 UTC
Florida Ridge

Mitch Shipley (T2C 144) crashed at launch after a weak link break. He tried to stretch out the downwind leg and then drug a tip turning it around and took out his keel (at least).
Mitch teaches weak link break strategy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1LbRj-NN9U
And David Glover teaches us how to mass produce divinely inspired standard aerotow weak links:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TDHqsXRtl0


http://ozreport.com/9.011
2005 Worlds
Davis Straub - 2005/01/13

Tom Lanning had four launches, and two broken weaklinks and a broken base tube. He made it just outside the start circle.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Davis Straub - 2011/08/26 14:04:52 UTC

We had six weaklink breaks in a row at Zapata this year.
Davis Straub - 2011/08/28 15:26:28 UTC

We couldn't figure out why we had so many breaks so quickly. Maybe just coincidence.
http://ozreport.com/12.081
Weaklinks - the HGFA rules
Davis Straub - 2008/04/22 14:47:00 UTC

Here is the requirement from the 2007 Worlds local rules (which I wrote) for weaklinks:
Pilots must use weaklinks provided by the meet organizers and in a manner approved by the meet organizers. All weaklinks will be checked and use of inappropriate weaklinks will require the pilot to go to the end of the launch line to change the weaklink.

Weaklinks will consist of a single loop of Cortland 130 lb Greenspot braided Dacron Tolling line and should be placed at one end of a shoulder bridle.
At the 2008 Forbes Flatlands Greenspot for the first time was used as the standard weaklink material (thanks in large part to the efforts of Bobby Bailey). We applaud these efforts to improve the safety of aerotowing by using a better weaklink material.
Fuck you, Bobby Bailey - along with EVERYONE else whose name appears in the post save for Tom.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2859
Towing safety
Stu Caruk - 2005/07/02 01:32:27 UTC

Preventing towing accidents
Oh. So now you want to PREVENT them. Why the radical philosophical about-face?
O/K, maybe I'm just missing something...
Do ya think? Maybe the Wizard will grant you one if you bring him Linda Salamone's broomstick.
...but I don't understand this logic.
Logic ain't never gonna be your thing, Stuart. Stick to following protocols that somebody who DOES understand logic wrote.
Roger Wolff - 2005/06/30 07:24:03 UTC

Your whole argument is based on the assumption that excessive towforce needs to be prevented. This is not the case. Accidents need to be prevented.

Now, some people have seen weaklinks breaking and causing accidents. (Example: Hans Dekker tried to take off during the Dutch Open Flatland Competition last year, and when his force-limited release decided to release for him he dug into the ground. Luckily no injury.)
The arguements seem to be that the weaklink breaking is what causes the accidents.
- Weak links breaking don't cause accidents.

- People cause accidents.

- And they're not accidents - they're crashes.

- The most effective way people cause crashes is to use equipment that's not up to the job.

- The reason people use equipment that's not up to the job is because they don't know, care, and/or are incapable of understanding what the fuck they're doing and/or are under the instruction of people who don't know, care, and/or are incapable of understanding what the fuck they're doing. (Think you might resemble any of those remarks?)

- The single piece of equipment in towing least up to the job is the weak link specified by instructors who don't know, care, and/or are incapable of understanding what the fuck they're doing.
An example is used where an experienced pilot pounds in because the weaklink broke.
Experienced flyer - yes. Pilot - no. Actual pilots don't use weak links which break.
Soemtimes a bridal style is used that releases prematurely, or automatically if the pilot gets to far offline.
Not by anybody with half a brain or better - but Peter Birren is really into that sort of thing.
In this case it's not a weaklink issue so that has no bearing.
BULLSHIT. It was a FORCE-LIMITED RELEASE. Its function and effect on the safety of the towing operation was IDENTICAL to the crap you're telling people to deliberately include in their systems. It's a reusable weak link - well, reusable as long as you're as lucky as Hans was. (You can't read any better than you can write.)
Changing the bridal might be warranted...
Your parents should've changed their bridal. That DNA combination ain't working out so good.
...however, to prevent another recurrance...
There can't be ANOTHER recurrence yet. There has to be a recurrence first. And hopefully nobody involved in that operation was stupid enough to put that thing up again.
...in the future.
- As opposed to another recurrence in the past. (Those are the worst 'cause you have absolutely no clue as to what's about to happen.

- Do ya think? (Hey Mike - maybe you should put a link to this post to so your local forum doesn't miss out on this additional brilliance from Stuart.) Oh where would we mere mortals be without benefit of your wisdom in these matters?

- And after he gets rid of that crap he can use your crap for more recurrences in the future - or, if he prefers, past. Or, hell, both. It's entirely his call.
So, my question then becomes "Why did the WEAKLINK break in the first place?"
Why, I have absolutely no idea, Stuart. But maybe if you're extra patient with me you can walk me through the issues. Try to take it a bit slow though.
We can tow most pilots aloft with an adaquate climb rate using between 90 and 140 pounds of tow force. We routinely use less than 70 pounds for the initial launch of most pilots. Occasionally a tandem tow with a glider that has lousy performance on tow might see 200 pounds. I typically use a weak link with a calibrated breaking strength of around 265 pounds.
You think we'd be OK at 270... 275 maybe?
The only times I have seen them break are when I hit a huge ripping thermal on tow.
What happens if one of them breaks when you hit a huge ripping thermal just after you launch? I know you haven't actually done this 'cause you're still alive but can you extrapolate from what you experienced at five hundred feet and make any predictions? Just kidding.
When I was dramatically overtowed on launch, or when I was to lazy to change the sunbleached link that had 100 or so tows on it already at a location run by a tightwad (I deserved to have that one fail....).
- You deserve to have a lot more than that, Stuart. Maybe you could crack a few vertebrae or something on one of these so you start to grasp the issue a little better and start revising all this free advice you're excreting all over the web.

- Right. He didn't replace the sunbleached three cent piece of string because he was a TIGHTWAD.

- If you're a tightwad...
Tost Flugzeuggerätebau

An insert exchanged in time is always safer and cheaper than an aborted launch.
...you REPLACE the fuckin' three cent piece of string.

- If you're a tightwad you use a fuckin' three cent piece of string heavy enough to never break.

- What was the rating on that piece of string, Stuart? Was it something he pulled out of his ass which just happened to match what you pulled outta your ass? Or was it what you pulled outta your ass and handed it to him? Or are all you idiot zombies tuned into some wavelength emanating from some distant galaxy?

- So you...
Stu Caruk - 2005/06/28 21:03:57 UTC

I'm a big guy, and I clip in at 350 pounds or so.
...were using THE SAME PIECE OF STRING - forget the hundred or so tows on it and sunbleaching - that everyone else, people averaging pretty close to HALF your flying weight, maybe a chick or two around a third, were using as the ideal weak link to maintain their individual safety margins.
You simply can't say you never have overloads in your towing operation unless you simply never tow anything.
- What the fuck do you mean by "OVERLOAD" - asshole?
- Define it in terms of Gs.
- What's being overloaded?
Even the best most conciensious tow operation will have some little gremlin creep in and cause a problem.
Have you ever been to a conscientious tow operation? How would you know what to look for to identify it as such?
Assuming you routinely change your weaklinks, and you use a quality product and have tested the breaking strength of the link IN YOUR APPLICATION there is only one reason for a weaklink to break. ONLY ONE!
What's a quality product?
You have a piece of fishing line that blows within five percent of the number you pulled outta your ass?
And you've tested the breaking strength of the link IN YOUR APPLICATION to stay within five percent of the number you pulled outta your ass?
Now we've got a QUALITY PRODUCT?
Weaklinks break SOLEY BECAUSE YOU HAVE EXCEEDED THE TOW FORCE THEY WERE DESIGNED TO BREAK AT.
- Can you repeat that? Are you saying that a if you load a 250 pound weak link to 250 pounds it'll blow?

- So should you also use a quality product when you're selecting the person who specifies the design strength? Or is it OK to use some shithead with a second grade reading comprehension level who doesn't have a fuckin' clue as to what he's talking about?
They are no more than a fuse.
Yes, a fuse precisely calibrated to prevent you from being dragged after a blown launch more than fifteen feet or so.
They are designed to blow to prevent something more catastropic from happening.
OH!

- So we DO recognize that a weak link failure IS catastrophic.

- But we need to have that catastrophe to prevent ANOTHER and GREATER catastrophe which will INEVITABLY occur whenever the tension is allowed to climb beyond the point at which the first catastrophe occurred because that tension instantly went from a number some shithead pulled out of his ass to ZERO.

- We don't know what this second catastrophe will be so we refer to it as "SOMETHING".

- It could be someone breaking his neck...

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=28697
Weak links why do we use them. in paragliding.
Aart de Wachter - 2009/12/01 19:08:56 UTC

In The Netherlands only static winches are used. Every now and then the cable brakes. This is no problem when you're fifty meters high, but below that a cable or weak link break can be disastrous. The worst we had was somebody breaking his neck after a cable failure at twenty meters.
...AND a wrist.

- It could be an instructor and and his victim being killed...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=865
Tandem pilot and passenger death
Mike Van Kuiken - 2005/10/13 19:47:26 UTC

The weak link broke from the tow plane side. The towline was found underneath the wreck, and attached to the glider by the weaklink. The glider basically fell on the towline.
...EVEN MORE instantly.

- But we know that this secondary catastrophe - whatever it is - is gonna be really really bad 'cause Stewie assures us it will be.

- We also know when a particular Reliable Source pulls a number out of his ass...
TowMeUp.com - 2012/04/22

Most reliable sources believe that a weaklink should be sized so that it breaks at 75% to 100% of the inflight load.
...to design a weak link to cause a catastrophe to prevent a worse catastrophe that number is INVIOLABLE - and one must spare no pains to hit it as accurately as possible.

- If the Reliable Source BELIEVES 0.75 Gs to be the design target you don't even wanna know what would've happened to you at 0.80.


- If the Reliable Source BELIEVES 1.0 to be the design target you'll be perfectly OK no matter what from slack through three quarters and four fifths all the way up to a solid one but at 1.1 you'll have wished you had never been born.

- One can therefore conclude from this that if the goal is to design a weak link to prevent catastrophes under a wide range of tow tensions one should find a Reliable Source which believes the target should be...

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=28697
Weak links why do we use them. in paragliding.
Alan Maguire - 2010/01/01 11:39:33 UTC

I tow a Nova Triton. When I wrote to Nova to ask their advice, their research team told me to use two hundred kilograms to protect myself from accidental breaks.
...maybe twice or more the rating of the low end morons.
I ABSOLUTELY agree that the goal in safe towing needs to be to prevent accidents.
And here I've been thinking all this time that the goal in safe towing needed to be to CAUSE accidents. Thanks for clearing that up for me, Stuart. (Hey Mike - you getting all this down?)

A little review of the salient points covered so far...

- A 250 pound weak link will blow when the towline tension reaches 250 pounds.

- If a Reliable Source specifies a weak link design for a particular tension never exceed that design tension or you WILL experience a catastrophe worse than the one you just had when that design blew.

- The goal in safe towing needs to be to prevent accidents.

I'll now give everyone a modest recess to help better absorb this information before continuing on.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2859
Towing safety
Stu Caruk - 2005/07/02 01:32:27 UTC

Removing the weaklink simply allows what should be a minor incident to escalate to something more significant.
'Cept in the REAL world, douchebag. In the REAL world the crap you're advocating virtually ALWAYS does the PRECISE OPPOSITE. Installing a three quarter G piece of fishing line into your system can convert a situation in which...

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=28641
Weak links in towing paragliders with pay out winch
Steve Beach - 2010/01/10 16:24:45 UTC

I have two examples of weak link failure almost causing injury and no examples of weak links preventing problems.

In training last year as a pg tow techs, my wife and I logged a hundred truck tows and thirty boat tows - all payout. One instance where weak link failure almost hurt a pilot was this:

We began the tow with three hundred feet of line out and a line tension based upon pilot all-up weight. At his signal, my wife began driving as I monitored the winch. After we'd "towed" another three hundred feet, putting us six hundred feet from the pilot he still had not attempted to launch.

All 75 launches we'd towed had seen the pilots launching by the time we had only driven 150 feet distance or less. I deduced (and he later verified) that he wanted more tension. He is an instructor (and was also in training for tow tech) and I have much less pg experience than he, so I believed he knew better than I how much tension he needed.

I added more tension on the Quantum winch by turning the tensioning screw two more turns, THEN he began his pull-up, immediately catapulted, and was not using a tow assist bridle which would have likely prevented the high angle of his catapulting launch.

He climbed steeply to forty feet and the weak link broke. He did a series of brake inputs, full on - full off till contacting earth on his airbag. He was okay, but his weak link failure could easily have caused catastrophic injury to him.

There is no doubt in my mind that the weak link failure nearly caused terrible injury to the pilot and a less coordinated pilot almost certainly would have been badly injured or worse. Up to the point of weak link failure he controlled his direction perfectly. Had the link not failed, he would have had an uneventful launch.
...little or...
My father reports a weak link failure at thirty feet that had him surge into the ground from exactly the most dangerous altitude possible for his glider's surge tendencies. Only his timely brake input and perfectly executed forward tumble prevented serious injury. His tow was proceeding perfectly until the weak link failure nearly caused significant injury.

I am convinced stronger - not weaker - weak links are best.
...NOTHING is going wrong with the tow and INSTANTLY convert it into a full blown DISASTER.

- It's there to and can ONLY BE predicted to do ONE FUCKING THING - blow before the glider does.

- And you should never in your entire flying career put yourself or let yourself be put in a situation in which you NEED it to blow before your glider does 'cause - unless you're really high - what happens AFTER it blows to protect your glider is very likely to be very ugly.

- But the good news is that even with the bozos we typically see on both ends of the string you're gonna be very hard pressed to get into a situation in which you NEED the weak link to protect your glider.

- Both you and your glider are a lot more likely to come out smelling like roses if you pull your fucking release in a situation in which you need to get off tow.
If weaklinks are breaking on launch you need to find the reason for the excessive tow force in the first place.
Get fucked.

- If weak links are breaking on launch there CAN'T POSSIBLY BE ENOUGH EXCESSIVE FORCE TO BE BREAKING SOMETHING DESIGNED TO PROTECT THE GLIDER.

- And if there were you wouldn't have any trouble identifying the issue. It would be the truck on the other end of your static line going sixty miles an hour.

- If weak links are breaking on launch there is ONE AND ONLY ONE REASON - you're an ASSHOLE who's using weak links a quarter the strength they NEED TO BE. PERIOD.
If you can limit the excessive to force the weaklink won't break...
Yeah Stuart. Our entire focus on launch should be to protect the precious weak link you pulled out out of your ass. Let's just forget about what WE want to do.
...and it will be in the system ready to do the job it is designed to do if something really unforeseen happens.
Lemme tell ya sumpin', Stuart...

This "if something really unforeseen happens" line of yours is total BULLSHIT. It's just a tool asshole operators like you use for ducking accountability when you fuck something up and/or tow somebody who isn't qualified.

Never once in the entire history of towing has there been an incident precipitated by an unforeseeable hazard that wasn't blindingly obvious to someone WITH a functional brain.

NOTHING unforeseen EVER happens to halfway competent pilots with halfway competent crewmen on halfway competent tow operations.

If you have anybody involved in an operation who isn't totally aware of every POSSIBLE threat to the tow and isn't IMMEDIATELY prepared to react to and neutralize it then nobody's got any goddam business putting gliders in the air.

Furthermore...

To say that if something "unforeseen" IS gonna happen that a weak link is gonna be the magic bullet to make things better is totally fucking moronic.

The ONLY "UNFORESEEN" events which happen when people aren't using shit equipment and don't have total assholes at BOTH ends of the line...
- turbulence, gusts, thermals, dust devils
- excessive tension due to operator error
- line dig, winch lockup

- A Stewie Link is several hundred times more likely to fuck you over than help you out if you're low enough for anything to matter.

- If you're not equipped to blow tow instantly ON *YOUR* CALL without control compromise you'll be doing the gene pool a big favor by leaving it anyway.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2859
Towing safety
Stu Caruk - 2005/07/02 01:32:27 UTC

TowMeUp.com has done very well based upon experience we have gained with towing.
- Name one tow operator who'll tell you he's done very poorly based upon experience he's gained with towing.
- What was happening at TowMeUp.com BEFORE you gained experience with towing?
- Name one thing you learned in your experience with towing that Wilbur and Orville hadn't figured out close to a century before.
Years ago we had the very same issues you are apparently experiencing.
WHAT issues WHO'S "APPARENTLY" experiencing?

Launching these things ain't rocket science, everybody knows how to fly them into the air. They're DISCUSSING issues. And the only significant issues they're EXPERIENCING are those precipitated by your idiot fucking Stewie Links.
The circle of friends and schools we routinely towed with in the early days broke a lot of weaklinks right after launch...
Big surprise.
...stretched out more than a few line sets...
How many Gs does it take to stretch out a line set, what's the glider doing when you're hitting the glider with that many Gs, what the fuck is the guy on the upwind end of the towline thinking when he delivers that much tension, and how high above an IQ of twelve do you need to go in order to use a weak link which will protect your lines (and - preferably - nothing more)?
...had some seriously overtowed surging climbouts to WAY to high a line angle.
How tough is THAT to NOT DO?
Only through sheer luck were there no serious accidents...
Yeah, that would be about the only explanation I'd be able to come up with. There sure as hell wasn't much in the way of thinking and learning going on.
...given that all our experience was gained from mostly trial and error.
GODDAM RIGHT IT WAS. Pretty obvious that research, math, science, thinking, and common sense were never elements in your progress.
We've already hashed and rehashed why we are so adimant in the use of tow assist style bridals. They are IMHO the greatest safety aid for towing paragliders ever invented. Kudos to the guys at Firebird.
Fuck the guys at Firebird.

- Hang gliding figured out that you needed an upper attachment point to help the pilot hold the nose down before it figured out where to put the lower attachment. And you guys got the lower attachment right 'cause there was no other place to put it.

- They don't even MENTION weak links on their website or in their owners' manuals so the DHV, BHPA, and assholes like you can and do mandate whatever Stewie Link limitations they feel like.
It may have been a necessity with certain of their gliders, but their solution works on virtually all gliders out there. By helping to insure the glider comes cleanly overhead on launh, it allows the pilot to be lifted off with much lower tow forces.
And combine that capability with a Stewie Link and what could POSSIBLY go wrong during any given launch?
Even heavy solo gliders like myself come off the ground with well under 100 pounds of line tension. If your weaklink breaks with this low of a line tension, you have a much more serious problem.
- MY weak link WON'T break with ANY level of line tension anyone's likely to encounter in a flying career so I tend not to have any serious problems.

- Isn't it wonderful how beautifully the tow assist helps protect YOU from your Stewie Link!
One of the requirements to safe towing is to use no more tension than is required to allow the pilot to climb to a safe altitude.
One of WHOSE "requirements" for safe towing, asshole? You just pull a statement out of your ass and put it up like it's a Commandment from God?

You use equipment up to the job, tow with whatever goddam tension makes YOU the most comfortable, and keep your airspeed up until you're high enough that if something breaks or somebody makes a good decision in the interest of your safety it won't matter.

Fuck you.
Any increased tension to allow a higher climrate should only occur after the pilot has gained sufficient altitude to recover from an inadvertent line or weklink break.
- Yeah, any increased tension to ALLOW us the PRIVILEGE of a higher climb rate through the kill zone SHOULD only occur after the pilot has gained sufficient altitude to recover from the "inadvertent" failure of the worn out piece of shit towline on which your friendly neighborhood tow operator is risking your life or the Stewie Link he's using to prevent something MORE catastropic from happening.

- Is there any possibility that increased tension to allow a higher climb rate WILL occur BEFORE the pilot has gained sufficient altitude to recover from an inadvertent line or Stewie Link break?

- What's your position on DELIBERATE line and weklink breaks?
Our hydraulic Payout winches were designed from the outset to be able to absolutely limit the maximum tow force possible during the tow.
So there's no possibility whatsoever of a line dig?
For example when training new tow techs, I adjust the primary relief valve so that it is impossible to produce over 140 pounds of tow force in the system. Even with the most ham fisted tow tech attempting to tow me.
If that's such a brilliant fucking idea, Stewie...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=11497
Aerotow release options?
Helen McKerral - 2009/06/29 06:32:32 UTC

The three times I narrowly avoided injury when car towing was purely through luck, not skill (stopping was not an option - I could only screech, MORE TENSION MORE TENSION MORE TENSION and hope the vehicle had enough oomph to get me up).
...how come you don't leave it set that way permanently?
As long as I use an assist device, it's almost impossible for me to be jerked into the air with the glider well behind me.
Yeah asshole - ALMOST. And when you get gusted and it suddenly becomes NOT IMPOSSIBLE for you - or, more importantly, one of your victims - to get jerked off with the glider well behind, what's your:
- Stewie Link gonna do?
- glider gonna do after your Stewie Link does it?
I may need to run a bit while they add tension but that's not usually the problem.
Is it ever UNUSUALLY the problem?
...unless something really unforseen happens (pilot trips...
- A pilot tripping on launch is something REALLY UNFORESEEABLE at your operation?

- Is there more potential for some UNFORESEEABLE shit happening while you NEED to run a bit under light tension...
Zack C - 2011/03/04 05:29:28 UTC

I now feel platform launching is the safest way to get a hang glider into the air (in the widest range of conditions). You get away from the ground very quickly and don't launch until you have plenty of airspeed and excellent control.
...than there would be if you just blasted the glider into the air...
Stu Caruk - 2005/06/28 21:03:57 UTC

Early on we were taught to let the tow tech crank up the line tension and resist the forward pull as long as was phsically possible, and then allow the tech to pull us into the air.
...the way you did before before you figured out that this technique was causing too many of your Stewie Links to prevent something more catastropic from happening?
Overtowing on launch is, however, a very serious problem and needs to be addressed.

It's obvious that high towline tensions can be reduced, and towing safety is greatly enhanced by doing so. We need weaklinks in the system to accomodate those unexpected things that happen to cause excessive tow forces on the system to occur. That is exactly what a weaklink prevents.
Get fucked.
If your weaklinks are breaking I do have some suggestions though, that you might try before you choose to discard themfrom your system:
I just gave you a really good suggestion, Stewie. Take it and shut the hell up.
Three quarter G Stewie Link or no weak link whatsoever in the system. Which ear do you normally shit out of? Left? Right? Both?
Post Reply