Infinite. So we should be able to get about thirty to forty percent of the moronic statements that have been used to answer Tracy's question archived here.
Higher EDUCATION - 2011/07
HOW TO GET THE USHPA AEROTOW RATING
Lisa
Technically, the pilot needs to learn the skills required to perform at a minimum level of competence per what is spelled out in USHPA SOP 12-02.12.
But the equipment...
This release shall be operational with zero tow line force up to twice the rated breaking strength of the weak link.
...doesn't.
Oh, right. You motherfuckers changed the word "Requirements" to "Guidelines" so you won't get your asses sued out of existence when one of your Quallaby or Bailey releases locks up.
Basically, this includes passing the AT written exam and an oral quiz [SOP 12-02.12(A.1-4)] on:
1. Demonstration of proper set-up, inspection, and use of aerotow equipment.
Doesn't matter if it's dangerous, noncompliant shit that won't work when you most need it to...
When Jim got me locked out to the right, I couldn't keep the pitch of the glider with one hand for more than a second (the pressure was a zillion pounds, more or less), but the F'ing release slid around when I tried to hit it. The barrel release wouldn't work because we had too much pressure on it.
Anyhow, the tandem can indeed perform big wingovers, as I demonstrated when I finally got separated from the tug.
As long as you've demonstration proper setup and inspection and popped it open once with the launch assistant pulling on the towline while you're lying on the launch cart.
2. Demonstration and use of aerotow signals and emergency procedures.
Emergency procedures for WHAT?
- We're using two and one point Industry Standard equipment that's been refined and perfected over several decades and hundreds of thousands of tows worth of experience conducted by numerous aerotow operators across the county and never fails.
- And even if there WERE a problem with our Industry Standard equipment we've all got hook knives ferchrisake.
- We've undergone tandem Cone of Safety and oscillation and standard aerotow weak link recovery training.
- And even if we're stupid enough to get outside of The Cone of Safety we're using standard aerotow weak links which we expect to break as early as possible in lockout situations and can be used as instant hands free releases.
How could one POSSIBLY find himself in an emergency situation?
The ONLY emergency situations you've mentioned in your entire series occur when the glider shoots up off the cart and noses the tug into the runway or stays low on takeoff and forces the tug up into a vertical climb through the gradient which inevitably results in a fatal whipstall.
Sure, those are real tragedies and we're always devastated when they happen but it's not like they're problems for the glider.
I've read the excellent book, Towing Aloft, from cover to cover, the material on the websites of Wallaby, Quest, Kitty Hawk Kites, Lookout, Blue Sky, Highland Aerosports, Cowboy Up, and USHGA's aerotowing safety advisory and I'm really not seeing how a halfway competent Hang Two could ever find himself in circumstances the least bit dangerous.
3. Discussion of dangers to hang glider pilot and tug pilot of getting out of the cone of safety in straight and turning flight.
There IS no danger to the hang glider pilot who gets out of The Cone of Safety in straight or turning flight.
The Wallaby Ranch Aerotowing Primer for Experienced Pilots - 2012/08/03
If you fail to maintain the correct tow position (centered, with the wheels of the tug on the horizon), the weak link will break before you can get into too much trouble.
Obviously.
The danger is ALL to the tug pilot because he may be unaware that weak link broke because you failed to maintain the correct tow position (centered, with the wheels of the tug on the horizon) and fly into the ground trying to help you out.
Higher EDUCATION - 2011/07
HOW TO GET THE USHPA AEROTOW RATING
Tracy
What about practical aerotow flight skills?
Lisa
This requires a minimum of two tandem aerotows flights in smooth air [SOP 12-02.12(A.5)], with:
1. Demonstration of successful, confident, controlled launches and flight under tow to release at altitude with a tandem pilot, with a smooth release and turn to the right when transitioning to free flight.
Yeah. Make ABSOLUTELY SURE you turn to the right. That's a real biggie for hang gliding.
2. Demonstration of proper directional and pitch control, resulting in proper tracking of the aerotow vehicle in both straight and turning flight and appropriate maintenance of proper tow line tension and airspeed.
Yeah, appropriate maintenance of proper tow line tension and airspeed...
...up to the point permitted by your standard aerotow weak link.
3. Demonstration of proper technique for at least one normal and one crosswind takeoff (actual or simulated) with a tandem pilot.
You take off and keep the fuckin' wings level no matter what ferchrisake. Why do they have to be with a tandem pilot?
4. Demonstration of ability to control the glider position within the "cone of safety" behind the aerotow vehicle by performing "cross" and "diamond" maneuvers during tow at altitude with a tandem rated pilot who is experienced and proficient at performing those maneuvers. (Note: This checks for positive control and lockout prevention skills, somewhat like the "boxing the wake" maneuver used for sailplane aerotow check flights, but "boxing the wake" must not be performed by hang gliders on tow due to lack of 3-axis control.)
Ya know what's an even better demonstration of ability to control the glider position within the "cone of safety" behind the aerotow vehicle? Staying in perfect position at all times in smooth air and reacting properly in the rough stuff. (Sometimes I wonder how I managed to survive aerotowing in the years between 1986 and 2008 without ever once having probed the precise edges of the zone inside of which is total safety and outside of which is instant death.)
5. Demonstration of ability to recover from roll oscillations induced by the tandem pilot.
6. Demonstration of proper reaction to a weak link/tow rope break simulation with a tandem rated pilot, initiated by the tandem pilot at altitude, but at a lower than normal release altitude.
I notice you motherfuckers specify that the weak link/tow rope break simulation - when YOU'RE on board - is to be done AT ALTITUDE.
...standard aerotow weak link failures are no BFDs - kinda fun actually.
This is then followed by a minimum of at least three solo aerotow flights in smooth or mildly turbulent air to:
1. Demonstrate successful, confident, controlled launches and flight under tow to release at altitude as a solo pilot, with a smooth release and turn to the right when transitioning to free flight.
Yeah, keep emphasizing that turn to the right. Absolutely critical. And keep totally ignoring THIS issue:
Gregg B. McNamee - 1996/12
1) To actuate the primary release the pilot does not have to give up any control of the glider. (Common sense tells us that the last thing we want to do in an emergency situation is give up control of the glider in order to terminate the tow.)
If your system requires you to take your hand off the control bar to actuate the release it is not suitable.
so that we can keep on unnecessarily killing someone once every few years.
Ya know what, Trisa Tilletti? I'm guessing that when a Roy Messing gets killed in part 'cause he gets out of position and his piece o' shit Lockout Mountain Flight Park release locks up when he does you get to sell more fins and Cone of Safety tandem lessons. So you don't have a whole lot of incentive to get that crap out of circulation, right?
2. Demonstrate proper directional and pitch control, resulting in proper tracking of the aerotow vehicle in both straight and turning flight and appropriate maintenance of proper tow line tension and airspeed. Such demonstrations may be made in smooth or mildly turbulent air.
Tracy
These requirements set a baseline/minimum level of competence for getting the AT rating. Does it really provide assurance that a new AT-rated pilot can fly in tough conditions?
Lisa
Absolutely not. SOP 12-02.12(A.6) states: "Additional instruction or mentorship should be provided to help the newly rated aerotow pilot gradually transition to towing in mid-day thermal/ turbulent conditions." In our experience, it can take 10 to 20, or even more, mentored solo flights for a new AT H-2 pilot to transition to mid-day soaring and reasonably windy conditions.
Not all AT rating candidates are new Hang Twos.
Tracy
Then, AT pilots need continued mentorship as they transition to new equipment.
Yeah Tracy, ALL of them.
Lisa
Yeah, just like all the school kids in Lake Woebegone and at the University of Michigan, our club's pilots are smarter and above average.
Just not smart enough to know that it's spelled "Wobegon".
Tracy
So, how does a pilot learn the AT skills prescribed by SOP 12-02.12?
SOP 12-02.12 is a fuckin' death trap. It sucked before you slimeballs revamped it and then you totally gutted what very little it had going for it. Under its terms you can fly with with releases with no load capacity whatsoever which may become totally inaccessible in a heartbeat, no weak link minimums, a front end weak link half the strength of the glider's, weak links on both ends capable of being taken out of the equation, and nylon towlines and bridles. Fuck you.
Lisa
Hopefully, from a good, well-qualified instructor who has a good curriculum.
And somebody with more than a dust particle's worth of common sense - which leaves damn near everybody pretty much shit outta luck.
Higher EDUCATION - 2011/07
HOW TO GET THE USHPA AEROTOW RATING
Tracy
To start, the instructional objectives for our syllabus can simply be the AT written and oral knowledge requirements and the AT flight skill requirements that are listed in SOP 12-02.12, which you just covered.
Yeah, good idea. Write a few paragraphs of watered down, clueless, useless crap designed to protect the national organization and its officials and the flight parks and their instructors from any vestige of accountability and use it as the foundation of your training program.
Lisa
Then our curriculum can be set so as to teach those skills in a logical, set-by-step manner. Let's start with the ground school portion:
Ground work:
5. Conduct ground training, covering aerotow techniques, signals, and technology.
Yeah, make sure you cover that technology. Imprint the students on all that moronic coathangered together crap you've been using for the past couple of decades and implant the idea that if there were better ways of doing things everyone - starting with you - would've been doing them already.
7. Post-exam review of AT exam questions/answers to fill knowledge gaps and improve understanding.
Or move it irrevocably backwards towards the level you assholes have.
Tracy
What's the next part of the curriculum?
Zack C - 2012/06/02 02:20:45 UTC
With that flawed assumption, the discussion could only go downhill.
Lisa
The tandem and solo AT flight training portion:
Air work:
06. Follow hand signals given by tug pilot to direct a change of tow position (up/down/hold).
Yeah, we use those all the time in real life.
07. Release at signal from tug pilot and turn to right (conserving speed, avoiding nose pop-up).
The nose doesn't pop up. The angle of attack does but the nose starts dropping through.
14. Simulated weak link/line break (release initiated by surprise by instructor).
So far I've only had negative experiences with weak links. One broke while aerotowing just as I was coming off the cart. Flared the glider immediately to land and put my feet down in preparation only to find the cart still directly below me. My leg went through the two front parallel bars forcing me to let the glider drop onto the control frame in order to prevent my leg from being snapped.
so the student can practice techniques for keeping his legs intact?
Oh, right. You teach on tandem gliders that take off and land with castering wheel gear.
Tracy
How about including what to do to get the rating after training is completed?
Lisa
That would include the oral quiz and flight skills demonstration, which can be fulfilled concurrently with training, since the instructor is usually also the rating official...
And the person who sells the equipment, ignores the at-altitude incidents, buries the crash incidents, writes up the fatality reports, and engineers the SOPs to absolve himself of any accountability for anything.
Lisa
This particular curriculum is similar to what we experienced many years ago as sailplane student pilots.
Lisa Colletti - 2012/06
Actually, that is our expectation of performance for weak links on hang gliders here at Cloud 9, too. Primarily, we want the weak link to fail as needed to protect the equipment, and not fail inadvertently or inconsistently. We want our weak links to break as early as possible in lockout situations, but be strong and reliable enough to avoid frequent weak link breaks from turbulence. It is the same expectation of performance that we have for the weak links we use for towing sailplanes.
So what assholes signed y'all off for your sailplane tickets?
Following this approach to learning what is necessary to tow is thorough and very effective.
Lisa Colletti - 2012/06
Sailplane weak links rarely fail inadvertently--that's not so much the case for hang gliding weak links. To help people understand why this is so, I think that it would be good to describe and compare de facto standard sailplane weak link designs with hang glider weak link designs.
Because of hang glider weak link designs, shouldn't hang gliding training include about a thousand times more weak link failure simulations - preferably including drills in the one to ten foot altitude range where they most often occur in actual practice?
Tracy
The science, technique, and technology for aerotowing and teaching of aerotowing for hang gliding has gradually evolved and improved over the years and has gotten closer and closer to the approach used and approved by the FAA over many decades of towing of sailplanes.
It's going backwards. Fuck you.
Lisa
And, aerotowing of hang gliders is now covered by the same FARs for towing of sailplanes.
But I have seen others fail twice and one of them was during one of my training tandems. I just kept hitting the brake lever for a few seconds in WTF mode, and the instructor used the barrel release. The other one I saw failing was another tandem. The release just opened when they took off, around fifty feet up.
I'm Tracy Tillman, on the USHPA BOD, on the Tow Committe, and I am an Aviation Safety Counselor on the FAA Safety Team (FAAST) for the Detroit FSDO area. As a rep of both the USHPA and FAA, I would like to help you, USHPA, and the FAA improve safety in flying, towing, and hang gliding.
...is - like damn near all of your other relationships - incestuous.
...and practically (our producing competent aerotow pilots) the techniques and requirements we follow for aerotowing of hang gliders have become more closely aligned with aerotowing of sailplanes. This happened concurrently with the FAA establishing common FARs for aerotowing of hang gliders and sailplanes. That is why the tandem "cross" and "diamond" out-of-position maneuvers are now a required part for hang glider aerotow instruction.
The tandem "cross" and "diamond" out-of-position maneuvers are now a required part for hang glider aerotow instruction because you and your commercial interest cronies shoved them down everyone's throats without consultation of or review by anyone.
These out-of-position training and skill demonstration maneuvers replace the tried-and-true "box the wake" maneuver that has been used for sailplane aerotow instruction for many decades, because the "boxing the wake" maneuver requires 3-axis aerodynamic control, rather than weight-shift control.
If they've been required for many decades what's your evidence that they're tried-and-true? Where's the control group that was having ten times as many crashes 'cause it hadn't undergone boxing the wake training? Did sailplaning undergo a dramatic reduction in crash rates upon implementation of boxing the wake training?
Becoming proficient at these maneuvers produces a competent tow pilot who can safely handle out-of-position situations.
Right.
Bill Bryden - 2000/02
Dennis Pagen informed me several years ago about an aerotow lockout that he experienced. One moment he was correcting a bit of alignment with the tug and the next moment he was nearly upside down. He was stunned at the rapidity. I have heard similar stories from two other aerotow pilots.
I have never had a lockout situation happen so quickly and dramatically and had no chance to release as I have always thought I could do.
Now if only we could figure out how to safely handle the in-position situations.
Below is a drawing of a hang glider student learning to do the cross maneuver with her instructor. It shows them halfway through the maneuver, at the low 6 o'clock position of the diamond (shown in red), which is at the low edge of the cone of safety (shown in yellow). The normal "sweet spot" for towing is when the hang glider is at the very center of the cone of safety, which in this case would be when the wheels of the tug (and the horizontal centerline of the cone of safety) are on the horizon.
Higher EDUCATION - 2011/07
HOW TO GET THE USHPA AEROTOW RATING
Lisa
It should be noted that the normal "sweet spot" tow position behind the high-powered tugs we fly here at Cloud 9 is lower than that for tugs with less power, due to our very high climb rate, climb angle, and deck angle. Thus, our normal tow position has the wheels of the tug above the horizon.
This is bullshit.
- You're using the same fucking 914 Dragonfly tugs that every other substantial aerotowing operation on the planet is.
- Everyone and his dog in hang glider and sailplane aerotowing flies level with the tug.
- A 582 Dragonfly towing a 230 pound T2 144 is gonna walk by one of your 914s towing a 570 pound tandem trainer.
- If there were any legitimacy to that bullshit you'd be specifying different tow positions for different gliders - low for light clean stuff and high for heavy draggy stuff.
- I can name you about about eight people who were killed primarily 'cause the tug got high on them and stayed there.
- Keeping the tug above the horizon puts you closer to the wake and reduces your margins when the shit hits the fan.
- It's a lot easier and safer for the planes on both ends of the towline for the glider to get back into position by pulling in rather than pushing out.
The requirement for including these maneuvers as part of tandem aerotow instruction for the AT rating came out of the Hang Glider Instruction Symposium, which occurred in Salt Lake City in early 2010. At this meeting, some of the best and most experienced instructors gathered from all across the US to share ideas and improve best practices in hang gliding instruction.
- Name ONE person who attended that meeting who wasn't a within easy reach, pin bending, 130 pound Greenspot total asshole.
- And the results were received with unrestrained and unanimous approbation...
I have to say also, that I am really surprised that after all the flack the USHPA has taken in recent years for not getting feedback from the membership before making major changes that they are still doing it. Even as heavy handed as the FAA can be, a notice of proposed rule making is released first to the flying community to allow for a comment period prior to making it effective.
Larry Jorgensen - 2011/02/17 13:37:47 UTC
It did not come from the FAA, it came from a USHPA Towing Committee made up of three large aerotow operations that do tandems for hire.
Appalling.
...by aerotow operations across the country.
Lisa
It is my understanding that these changes cause a problem for some aerotow operations.
No fuckin' way!
Those requirements for including these maneuvers as part of tandem aerotow instruction for the AT rating came out of the Hang Glider Instruction Symposium, which occurred in Salt Lake City in early 2010. At that meeting, some of the best and most experienced instructors gathered from all across the US to share ideas and improve best practices in hang gliding instruction.
How could one POSSIBLY go the least bit wrong with that kind of brainpower all concentrated in one place at one time?
Tracy
Right, although the changes were meant to set a standard of best practice, it does cause an unintended problem for some aerotow operators who are unable to provide tandem aerotow instruction.
Right. If someone doesn't provide tandem instruction the only possible reason for that situation is that he's UNABLE to.
To accommodate these operations, the SOPs still include an option for solo-only aerotow instruction.
Yeah.
- EXACTLY the same "option" as a candidate had BEFORE your marvelous revisions.
- But only if he's fortunate enough to be able to get his rating from an operation that doesn't sell tandem rides.
- So we have a situation in which an AT rating on one's card means he's either undergone crosswind takeoff, cross and diamond maneuvers, roll oscillations, and weak link recovery training or hasn't.
- And that situation totally sucks and I think you'll be extremely hard pressed to find an analogous situation in any other certification program from ANYTHING.
Lisa
Our experience and approach to teaching and learning to aerotow is with tandem aerotow instruction. We just don't have the personal experience or expertise to explain how to teach it via solo-only aerotow instruction, so we won't try to address it in this article.
Right Lisa.
- This whole concept of solo training is so foreign to every fiber of your being, outlandish, unimaginable that you couldn't POSSIBLY address it in this article - or the SOPs that you rewrote.
- So when WILL you try to address it?
What you're saying is that solo only programs are way beneath your contempt and you're washing your hands of them.
If you motherfuckers really gave a rat's ass about aerotowing safety and believed in all this cone of safety and other tandem training crap you could find a way to incorporate it into solo training.
Put a radio on the pilot and a camera on the keel. Get him to altitude and tell him what to do - cross, diamond, oscillation; have him nose up and pop the release so he can get a feel up high for what a standard aerotow weak link can do to him down low. He can't get hurt and he doesn't need one of you consummate professional babysitters up there with him to figure things out.
Tracy
One other thing, what is the HIERTow pre-launch checklist?
Lisa
It is a pre-launch checklist for aerotowing, which pilots go through just prior to launch.
Just prior to launch... Now where have I heard those four words before?
A pre-flight check of equipment is different, and should be done earlier, after initial set-up and prior to going out to the flight line. Pilots in all forms of aviation use checklists prior to flight, during flight, prior to landing, and after landing. The more complex the aircraft and modes of flight, the more checklists they will use. It is easier to remember what is in a checklist--and not miss something--when an acronym is used. In this case, the acronym HIERTow covers five general areas. The first four, HIER should be checked while "on deck" waiting for the tug to land and prior to being attached to the tow rope, so as not to slow down launch operations.
Especially when everyone's using standard aerotow weak links. That's about as much stress as the operation can handle.
The last item, Tow, should be completed after being attached to the tow rope, just prior to launch. This is the HIERTow pre-launch checklist:
1. Hang check: Carabiner in primary and secondary hang loops
Yeah, make sure you get that backup loop. So many lives have been lost 'cause it was missed and the main failed.
...carabiner closed and locked...
And make sure that carabiner's locked. Wouldn't wanna fall out of your glider 'cause it wasn't.
...in leg loops, harness closed and secured (leg doors open)...
Yeah, keep that pod unzipped.
Lisa Colletti - 2012/06
Sailplane weak links rarely fail inadvertently--that's not so much the case for hang gliding weak links. To help people understand why this is so, I think that it would be good to describe and compare de facto standard sailplane weak link designs with hang glider weak link designs.
This ain't sailplaning.
...hang height verified...
Yeah, you never know when that's gonna undergo a dangerous shift - that you might not notice at takeoff position.
...parachute and helmet secured, no loose lines or cords.
2. Instrument check: Instruments secured, turned on, and set/zeroed. No loose lines or cords.
Yeah.
- Combine a check with something that doesn't matter with something that can cause you to pull a cart into the air with you.
- No loose lines or cords - the "I" in "HIER".
3. Equipment check: Overview scan of glider (this does NOT replace a careful preflight!!). Overview scan of launch cart, verify correct angle of attack, check that wheels are straight.
And, at Ridgely, aren't totally flat.
4. Release check: Check weak link...
I got news for ya, Lisa. A weak link, contrary to popular belief, is NOT a type of RELEASE.
Yeah. Check that 260 pound aerotow weak link. Make sure it's not fuzzed and is exactly the same one that everyone else is using - regardless of his or her flying weight. Based on several decades of experience and hundreds of thousands of tows conducted by numerous aerotow operators across the county, it's the de facto standard and has a huge track record.
...primary release routing...
Yeah, check every inch of that routing - from the lever velcroed onto your downtube and within easy reach, up the downtube, through a couple of feet of slop right to the end of the...
Yeah, have somebody take some pull on it while you trigger it. If it opens, fine.
GT Manufacturing Inc. (GT) and Lookout Mountain Flight Park Inc. (LMFP) make no claim of serviceability of this tow equipment. There is no product liability insurance covering this gear and we do not warrant this gear as suitable for towing anything.
You can ignore what it says in the owner's manual...
But I've had it once where the pin had bent inside the barrel from excessive tow force. My weaklink was still intact. The tug pilot's weaklink broke so I had the rope. I had to use two hands to get the pin out of the barrel.
Those secondary releases are nothing if not secure.
...bridle line routing (over the base tube and not twisted), location of hook knife.
Idiot.
5. Tow check: Verify in leg loops, bridle over the base tube, no loose parachute pins, no loose lines or cords (especially VG lines or harness cords) that could get caught on the launch cart. Note wind speed and direction, scan for traffic in pattern, mentally prepare for tow and emergency actions.
WHAT emergency actions?
- You:
-- can't lock out if you stay inside The Cone of Safety and any idiot can stay inside The Cone of Safety.
-- have a 260 pound standard aerotow weak link which, if you fail to maintain the correct tow position (centered, with the wheels of the tug on the horizon), will break before you can get into too much trouble.
- Your expectation is that it's strong and reliable enough to avoid frequent breaks from turbulence.
- You have:
-- within easy reach an Industry Standard primary release with a huge track record that you've just tested for function
-- an Industry Standard bent pin secondary release which is extremely secure
Whatever's going on back there, I can fix it by giving you the rope.
...poised to make a good decision in the interest of your safety within a fraction of a second of whenever the whim strikes him.
And you know the location of your hook knife.
What could POSSIBLY go wrong? It's just impossible for me to imagine any serious problem just off launch - especially since you've never mentioned any incidents or described any possibilities.
Close visor. Launch command is "Go, Go, Go."
Tracy
Well, that's it for this month's edition of Higher Education. The soaring forecast is great--let's go, go, go fly!
The best way to make change is to get involved, and join the Tow Committee at its meetings. That's what people who really care do to make change. Such is the nature of the great opportunities we have to make a difference in the US (although it means having to spend time, money, and effort, compared to the ease of just sitting in front of a computer.)
...just sit in front of a computer finding out what the fuck is going on and learning what the fuck we're talking about or, perish the thought...
Tracy Tillman - 2012/06
We could get into details of lab testing weak links and bridles, but this article is already getting long. That would be a good topic for an article in the future. Besides, with our backgrounds in formal research, you and I both know that lab tests may produce results with good internal validity, but are often weak in regard to external validity--meaning lab conditions cannot completely include all the factors and variability that exists in the big, real world.
...do any actual bench testing or engineering to identify and solve actual lethal issues in this idiot sport. Let's just go, go, go fly!
Asshole.
---
2022/05/16 15:00:00 UTC
1996/07/25 - Bill Bennett / Mike Del Signore (Dave Farkas)
1998/10/25 - Jamie Alexander / Frank Spears, Jr. (?)
2004/06/26 - Mike Haas (Arlan Birkett)
2005/09/03 - Arlan Birkett / Jeremiah Thompson (Gary Solomon)
So far unable to come up with the other solo I must have been thinking about.
In the UK, disclaimers arent worth the paper they are written on. They simply dont carry any weight whatsoever.
People tend not to even bother with them now. They tend to get their processes tight.. Even so, there are regular fatalities, even at the"Best" winch and aerotow schools.
Hence the huge costs of training in the UK due to the huge cost of insurance.
The UK's a fuckin' disaster area. They:
- plagiarized crap from Donnell and Dennis to write certifiably insane and strictly enforced regulations for lockout and stall preventing weak links.
- acknowledge in their regulations the extreme danger of having to take hands off the controls to actuate releases in emergency situations but only require a both hands on the controls release for tandem hang gliding aerotow - it's apparently just fine for solo hang gliders and all paragliders to use releases that stink on ice at all levels of proficiency.
- use massively inappropriate Koch two and one stagers for one point aerotow
- don't recognize any danger involved in aerotowing one point
- hafta import Quallaby two point releases from the US 'cause they're incapable of manufacturing their own shoddy crap
With tight processes and top quality equipment tow launch crashes DO NOT HAPPEN.
The Lois Preston fatality was a fuckin' atrocity and I hope the appropriate heads wind up on pikes. The assholes at:
- Airways Airsports who put her up on the oversized glider with the piece of shit release;
- BHPA who:
-- certified use of the piece of shit release
-- are incapable of recognizing that Hewett Links DON'T prevent fatal Lois lockouts and DO precipitate - rather than prevent - devastating stalls, especially amongst the bagwing crowd
Do the fuckin' job right - use top quality equipment and either figure out what a goddam weak link is or don't use them at all - and the safety and reward go up, the crashes disappear, and the costs go way down.
michael170 - 2012/08/06 07:12:52 UTC
What a load of crap.
Christopher LeFay - 2012/08/06 11:01:51 UTC
Most everybody will voice an opinion on just about anything - irrespective of experience. I offered what I've learned - not supposed or figured - from my own experience, and observation of low airtime and veteran pilots I admire. Call that what you like, Mike - it makes it much easier to assess the value of your opinion.
Transitioning in and close to launch is a horrible idea - the last thing we want to do in these moments is take our hands off of the control frame, or impair our ability to run. After a very few flights, most pilots that don't consciously prevent themselves from going prone and kicking in immediately will make it a reflex habit - so much so that they often have no recollection of doing either.
A pilot that is transitioning at the last anticipated step doesn't exhibit the discretion necessary to determine a safe distance; five seconds goes a long way toward negating the impact of such a lack of judgment.
Most everybody will voice an opinion on just about anything - irrespective of experience.
I avoid voicing and listening to OPINIONS on just about everything like the plague and there ain't shit in this sport...
Sure "there's always room for improvement", but you have to realize the depth of experience you're dealing with here.
Trisa Tilletti - 2012/06
Based on several decades of experience and hundreds of thousands of tows conducted by numerous aerotow operators across the county, the de facto standard has become use of a 260 lb. weak link made as a loop of 130 lb. green spot IGFA Dacron braided fishing line attached to one end of the pilot's V-bridle.
...that we need to be doing or learning based upon anyone's fucking EXPERIENCE. We had pretty much all the essential stuff down a century ago - and damn near all of it through running the numbers.
Transitioning in and close to launch is a horrible idea...
But transitioning in and close to landing, and butchering your control authority for the sake of a standup you have absolutely no need to do and likely never will, is standard operating procedure and good form - regardless of how many hundreds of people it cripples out of the sport.
...the last thing we want to do in these moments is take our hands off of the control frame...
Note the similarity...
Gregg McNamee - 1996/12
To actuate the primary release the pilot does not have to give up any control of the glider. (Common sense tells us that the last thing we want to do in an emergency situation is give up control of the glider in order to terminate the tow.)
...of the wording there, Christopher?
- The guy slope launching ALWAYS has the option of NOT taking his hands off the control frame should the shit happen to hit the fan right after he gets airborne.
- The guy aerotow launching with Industry Standard equipment NEVER does. And that limitation HAS resulted in fatalities. But I don't hear you getting behind the fixes for that deplorable situation.
Cite an incident precipitated by a transition to the basetube right after launch. Doesn't even hafta be a crash - just a control compromise.
Doesn't even hafta be a dramatic one...
Dennis Pagen - 2005/01
By the time we gained about sixty feet I could no longer hold the glider centered - I was probably at a twenty degree bank - so I quickly released before the lockout to the side progressed. The glider instantly whipped to the side in a wingover maneuver.
Imagine if you will, just coming off the cart and center punching a thermal which takes you instantly straight up while the tug is still on the ground. Know what happens? VERY high towline forces and an over-the-top lockout. You'll have both hands on the basetube pulling it well past your knees but the glider doesn't come down and still the weaklink doesn't break (.8G). So you pull whatever release you have but the one hand still on the basetube isn't enough to hold the nose down and you pop up and over into an unplanned semi-loop. Been there, done that... at maybe 200 feet agl.
...like the crap these assholes write off as just the cost of doing business. Just a significant roll will do.
...or impair our ability to run.
Explain to me how having one's hands on the basetube of a glider that's not only lifted itself but the pilot as well impairs one's ability to run.
After a very few flights, most pilots that don't consciously prevent themselves from going prone and kicking in immediately will make it a reflex habit - so much so that they often have no recollection of doing either.
A PILOT:
- always flies the glider in the most effective manner possible and understands what the fuck is going on with it at every moment.
- will ALWAYS go prone and kick in at the earliest moment it's safe and appropriate to do so - not 'cause it's a reflexive habit - but 'cause that's the configuration which yields the most effective control of the glider.
If the PILOT gets hit by some shit that makes it advisable to delay the transition and/or kick-in, he will.
...so much so that they often have no recollection of doing either.
Yeah Christopher. There HAVE BEEN plenty of people so hardwired into kicking into harnesses right after launch and getting out of harnesses, transitioning to the downtubes, going upright, foot landing, hitting spots that they've killed themselves. Those people either weren't or, at very unfortunate moments, ceased being PILOTS.
A pilot that is transitioning at the last anticipated step doesn't exhibit the discretion necessary to determine a safe distance...
transitioning long before the first anticipated step?
five seconds goes a long way toward negating the impact of such a lack of judgment.
I don't want or need a fuckin' stopwatch making my decision about when I should be proning out any more than I want or need a fuckin' standard aerotow weak link or a fuckin' tug driver making my decisions about when I should and shouldn't be on tow.
You have your hands on the downtubes YOU ARE NOT FLYING A CERTIFIED GLIDER.