You are NEVER hooked in.

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26691
Hooking in Down under :)
zamuro - 2012/07/23 19:52:19 UTC
But by the same token, putting all of the faith into a check just before yelling "Clear!" works fine until you're dealing with tricky launch conditions.
Exactly. I have seen this situation more than I care off...
Bullshit. You've seen situations in which it's a pain in the ass and/or dangerous to do hang checks. You have NEVER seen a hook-in checker skip a hook-in check because of tricky launch conditions.
...and I am pretty sure it was behind a failure to hook-in by a friend of mine who plunged to his death (I was not there that day).
1. Bullshit. He was hang checker.
2. And you can't be bothered to give us his name?
This is one of the reason why I adopted the always-hook-harness-to-the-glider-first-and-never-unhook-without-getting-outside-the-harness also known as the aussie method.
1. The reason why you adopted the always-hook-harness-to-the-glider-first-and-never-unhook-without-getting-outside-the-harness also known as the Aussie Method is 'cause you're an idiot.

2. What's the reason you violate the requirement of your rating which states:
With each flight, demonstrates a method of establishing that the pilot is hooked in just prior to launch.
Afraid it's gonna increase your chances of launching unhooked 'cause you might forget to do it in tricky launch conditions?

3. Idiot.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26691
Hooking in Down under :)
Brian Horgan - 2012/07/23 20:01:55 UTC

i will ask for the 3rd time

Would you try the Aussie method if you launched off unhooked using your method?

Anybody?
I hear crickets chirping
Anybody?
1. No lift and tugger has ever launched unhooked - so it's kind of a useless question.

2. If I made a historical first and survived would I join a cult whose members:
- ALL:
-- condition themselves to assume they're hooked in on launch
-- assume they're hooked in on launch
- REFUSE to verify they're hooked in at the instant of launch
- are totally incapable of detecting an unhooked launcher until he's dangling from the basetube
- REFUSE to acknowledge situations when it's dangerous to:
-- approach launch hooked in
-- climb into a harness on launch
- force themselves to do ridiculous gymnastics to remain consistent when there's zero possibility of an unhooked launch
- DEMAND that everyone within their sphere of influence conforms to their religion
- REFUSE to codify the requirements of their religion into official SOPs
- have well documented, spectacular, and predicable failures
- all have brains of the size and functionality of golf balls

What do you think?

3. I don't need to launch unhooked to identify and adopt the best strategy for not doing so any more than I need to lock out and slam into the runway to understand what a piece of shit a Quallaby release is and develop something that increases the chances of my survival a hundredfold.

4. But I really admire the way you don't modify your behavior until after you've almost killed yourself before adopting another strategy which can get you killed. If you survive another assumption that you're hooked in on launch lemme know and I'll have Sam get you fixed up with one of his nose mirrors.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26691
Hooking in Down under :)
Alan Wengren - 2012/07/23 20:16:27 UTC

I don't have to worry about this question because I would never forget to hook in and that's a promise. Image
I think it's a real safe bet to say that that was the mindset of the vast majority of people who've launched unhooked. Marc Fink and Rooney come to mind if you wanna talk to a couple of brain dead survivors (no more brain dead than they were before the events).

And EVERYBODY who's launched unhooked was one hundred percent certain that he hadn't forgotten to hook in on that particular effort.

So do the math, Alan.
Brian Horgan - 2012/07/23 20:28:28 UTC

i survived my fall and now you know my answer.So come on hang,would you?
Alan Wengren - 2012/07/23 20:47:05 UTC

I can't answer that until it would happen and it won't so this leaves me out but jsut for chits and giggles...

I guess either way works just fine of course but that all comes back to having a clear head and *thinking* about your routine no matter what method one uses.
Look at the way you just spelled "just", Alan. And you're basing your survival strategy on always having a clear head? Good freakin' luck.

Please tell me about ANY OTHER procedure or strategy in ANY BRANCH OF AVIATION that's based and dependent upon the pilot having a "clear head" and "*thinking* about his routine" in which the price of coming up a bit short is so likely to be death.

In THIS branch of aviation in THIS country we've got regulations that everybody's SUPPOSED to be following which include preflight checks AND a hook-in check so that actual humans are a lot less likely to end up as lifeless heaps on the rocks below the ramp after a few hundred launches 'cause they were a little bit too human one for a few critical seconds one time.
However I strongly believe there is no one way that is safer then the other or one will prevent death and the other will provoke it.
And you also strongly believe that under no circumstances should one make the slightest effort to launch in accordance with one's rating requirements.
It's all up to the pilot right before taking off if he or she is hooked in. Hence: *Pilot In Command* and making sure everything is A1 ready to go and in all one motion from pre-flight to launch.
You don't have a snowball's chance in hell of ever becoming a pilot.
Anyone else?
Anyone else who hasn't yet been banned from The Jack Show.
JJ Coté - 2012/07/23 03:28:37 UTC

I already use the method recommended by noman...
And ignore the one used by Rob Kells and mandated by your rating requirements.
...but paradoxically, my answer is "no". I already made a promise long ago that if I am ever even in a position where I am ready to launch, believing myself to be hooked in, and it turns out otherwise (e.g. if I were to do a hang check and discover it, or if someone were to point it out to me), I will disassemble my glider and fly no more ever again. (And that obviously also applies if I were to to launch unhooked.)
That's interesting, JJ. I already made a promise long ago that if I am ever even in a position where I am ready to launch believing myself to be hooked in I will disassemble my glider and fly no more ever again. (And that obviously applies if I were to to be be hooked in or not.)
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26642
100% foolproof hang loop and harness buckles
Robert Seckold - 2012/07/15 01:52:31 UTC
Steve Seibel - 2012/07/14 21:04:28 UTC

Does it work when you kite your glider up the sand dunes in strong winds...
Steve I don't know if you have seen an expert dune gooner setup and climb into his harness in strong winds without having to hold down the nose.

Here is a video of a friend showing how it is done. I have seen one particular instructor at Stanwell do a similar thing standing on the base bar in 25-30 knots at Stanwell hooking his passenger in on the point of the hill.

Go to:
2 min 55 sec and
6 min 05 sec to see how it is done.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3QCm2akv34
We don't see him climb into his harness at the first reference 'cause it was tedious and boring and you cut the camera at 3:38 at almost the instant Alan starts.

At the second reference we see nineteen seconds worth of Alan expending considerable effort in an uncomfortable position with one foot holding the glider down to get back in a harness he probably had no reason to get out of in the first place.

It's glassy smooth coastal air, the glider's constantly flying - through nose wires attachment, ground handling, and launching, the suspension is constantly tight when he's under the wing, and he's launching with his hands on the basetube.

It's PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE to not have the hang strap and both leg loops and NOT KNOW IT. It's a CONSTANT HOOK-IN CHECK.

But still ya gotta do the pain in the ass Aussie Method bullshit 'cause you need to keep reinforcing the programming that being able to assume that if you're in a harness you're connected to a glider and won't EVER hafta do a pansy-assed hook-in check when you're standing on the edge of an inland cliff in thermal conditions where you very well may be stressed out and have had one or two excellent reasons for not connecting your harness to your glider before getting into it.

(Or maybe Alan's just afraid that Robert will report him to the Central Committee and he'll be burned at the stake as a heretic or transported to the United States.)

Reminds me a lot of a couple of other hang gliding religions which have managed to totally abolish any vestiges of common sense.

- Standard Aerotow Weak Linkism

Always tow with a fuzzy loop of fishing line because it will ALWAYS work to improve the safety of the towing operation in which you're using Industry Standard releases which NEVER will.

- Spiral Fracture of the Humerusism

Always land at the Happy Acres putting green in the configuration in which you're most likely to break an arm or neck so you'll be able to do an emergency landing in a narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place in the configuration in which you're most likely to break an arm or neck.

P.S. It's spelled "Budgewoi", Robert.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Katie Mercer - 2012/04/29
The Province

"Within thirty seconds of takeoff, the pilot realized something was wrong" and tried to wrap his legs and desperately hold on to the passenger, said Jason Warner, spokesman for the Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association of Canada (HPAC).

"[The pilot] tried everything."

The young woman's boyfriend, who had reportedly purchased the excursion as a birthday gift, witnessed the horrific accident from the launch point along with the pilot's family.
Joel Siegfried - 2012/05/16
examiner.com

Orders is a certified hang gliding instructor, with over 16-years of flying experience. Until the fatal accident, which happened on his 50th birthday...

"My 12-year-old daughter was present that day..."
Doug Hildreth - 1988/11

The other well-known factor is a flight being done for show. If you are demonstrating to someone - family or friends, news media, any sort of special observer - the chances of failing to hook in are significantly increased.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=28654
Jay Powell's accident at Slide Mountain Jul.4 1998 or 1999
Marianne (Bing) - 2012/07/24 22:50:02 UTC

Jay Powell's accident at Slide Mountain, July 4 1998 or 1999

I'm trying to find an article about a hang gliding accident on Slide Mountain, Reno, Nevada on the fourth of July, about 1998, 1999. The name was Jay Powell, and he didn't clip in. Do you have anything about this accident? Thank you very much for reading this!

It was my son who crashed from Slide, for some unknown reason he didn't snap in. He had a helmet on, however he had a closed brain injury and will never be the same. I never did save any of the articles, now I'm trying to find one, if possible. His name is Jay Powell if you ever come across a writing, would you kindly send it on? I know that's much to much to ask, however, you never know!

Regards, Bing - <email>
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/11.220
Horst Zimmer of Bautek dies hang gliding
Davis Straub - 2007/11/09

Unhooked

http://www.dhv.de/typo/Home_Deutsch.2.0.html
http://www.dhv.de/typo/index.php?id=498&backPID=2&tt_news=1866
2007/11/06

The 64-year-old hang gliding flight pioneer Horst Zimmer dies while flying on November 5th. According to initial investigations Horst forgot to hook in. He fell from the ramp at Neumagen-Dhron.

Horst operated along with his brother Harald the renowned manufacturer Bautek. The hang gliding community loses Horst Zimmer an extraordinarily dedicated person. As a manufacturer, flight instructor, and in the club and association Horst has been working tirelessly for his sport.
This is my best guess at the translation. Thanks to Dave Kinlan.
2007/11/05 - N 49°52'38.77" E 06°53'15.56"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWNsSNNP3M8


Love those hook-in checks, dudes.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Robert V. Wills - 1976/12

1976/09/21 - Al Mulazzi - Talcott Mountain - Avon, Connecticut - UP Dragonfly

Mulazzi, for some reason, failed to hook in his harness when launching and was unable to pull himself up into the control bar because he already had a broken arm. He therefore fell to his death on rocks below.

Obvious pilot inadvertence. Mulazzi was not the first to suffer from this rather basic oversight, but we hope he is the last.
And here thirty-five and a half years and dozens of deaths later we have Udo Rehberg:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaxjZvu6s0Q


doing the same freakin' hook-in checkless launch at the same freakin' cliff.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.agassizharrisonobserver.com/news/164769156.html
Adrian MacNair - 2012/08/03 18:00
Agassiz-Harrison Observer - News

Hang gliding cause of death to be held back

The investigation into a hang gliding death that occurred near Agassiz in April is almost complete but the results might not be made public for another year.

Bruce Busby, vice president of the Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association of Canada [HGPAC] in Calgary, said the information will likely be held pending the outcome of a criminal trial for pilot Jon Orders.

"I don't know if it's the police or the courts but we've just been asked to wait," he said.

Lenami Godinez-Avila, 27, died when she fell from the glider shortly after taking off on a tandem flight with Orders from Mount Woodside. He was later charged with obstruction of justice for swallowing a memory card containing pictures of the flight that might offer clues as to how she fell to her death.

Busby stressed nobody from the HGPAC has seen any results from the investigation yet.

"I can only suspect they don't want to prejudice the case for Jon Orders."

Margit Nance, executive director of HGPAC in Vancouver, said even if the board received the report it wouldn't be made public.

"We would not just willy nilly release that. That would have to be determined whether that's appropriate," she said.

Nance said when the board receives the report the first person notified would likely be the lawyer for the pilot.

"We would be very careful and in fact we might very well hold the whole thing off until after the trial date as well, because for the same reason nobody wants inadvertently to affect in any way the proper carrying out of justice."

Nance said that the HGPAC has an accident reporting system in place to learn from such incidents, though this circumstance is different because of the criminal charge.

"Every accident is definitely a learning opportunity for everyone and we take that very seriously," she said.

The investigator in the accident is Martin Henry, a former president of the HGPAC, who has been working independently of the association in conjunction with the RCMP and the Coroner's Office.

Henry is considered one of the pioneers of the sport. Over the past 40 years he has developed many of the safety protocols and aviation techniques used in the sport today.

"He has flown huge distances and yet he's one of those finicky, particular pilots that always stays committed to safety," said Nance, adding he really stresses the importance of the pre-flight check.

Although Busby said he knows people are curious to learn whether it was pilot error or equipment malfunction that was responsible for Godinez-Avila's death, they'll have to wait just a bit longer.

The trial for Orders is expected to get underway April 15, 2013.
Hang gliding cause of death to be held back
The cause of death was a thousand foot freefall. She wasn't hang gliding. If she had been hang gliding - as was the plan for the day - she'd have been fine.
The investigation into a hang gliding death that occurred near Agassiz in April is almost complete but the results might not be made public for another year.
ALMOST complete? Still trying to figure out whether or not Jon had his shoes tied in compliance with HPAC regulations for tandem flights?
...HGPAC...
HPAC.
"I don't know if it's the police or the courts but we've just been asked to wait," he said.
1. YOU DON'T KNOW WHO ASKED YOU? Somebody just called you up and said, "I may or may not be from the police or courts but I'm asking you to sit on the report." And you said, "Well sure. That sounds pretty reasonable. No problem!" BULLSHIT.

2. I've been ASKING you brain dead motherfuckers to get your shit together on hook-in checks for years. So how come you don't do what *I* ask?
He was later charged with obstruction of justice for swallowing a memory card containing pictures of the flight that might offer clues as to how she fell to her death.
She fell to her death at 32 feet per second squared. I'da thunk that would've been pretty obvious from the autopsy results.
Busby stressed nobody from the HGPAC has seen any results from the investigation yet.
Not counting Martin Henry.
"I can only suspect they don't want to prejudice the case for Jon Orders."
I can only suspect they want to prejudice the case against Jon Orders and absolve themselves of their negligence in not implementing and enforcing a hook-in check regulation.
Margit Nance, executive director of HGPAC in Vancouver, said even if the board received the report it wouldn't be made public.
No shit.
"We would not just willy nilly release that. That would have to be determined whether that's appropriate," she said.
Nah. Really hard to imagine making a report about a member of the public killed by a pilot certified by and operating under the regulations of your sleazy organization being made public.
Nance said when the board receives the report the first person notified would likely be the lawyer for the pilot.
And the last person notified would likely be lawyer for the victim's family.
"We would be very careful and in fact we might very well hold the whole thing off until after the trial date as well, because for the same reason nobody wants inadvertently to affect in any way the proper carrying out of justice."
1. He's charged with obstruction of justice for swallowing a memory card AFTER everything relevant to the fatality was history.
2. Yeah, and we're not gonna be concerned about the issue of withholding the report helping setting anyone up for a rerun.
Nance said that the HGPAC has an accident reporting system in place to learn from such incidents...
You assholes couldn't learn anything from such incidents if your thick skulls were chiseled open and the information were poured in from five gallon buckets.
...though this circumstance is different because of the criminal charge.
The criminal charge has NOTHING to do with how Lenami got dropped.
"Every accident is definitely a learning opportunity for everyone and we take that very seriously," she said.
Fuck you.
The investigator in the accident is Martin Henry, a former president of the HGPAC, who has been working independently of the association in conjunction with the RCMP and the Coroner's Office.
1. Yeah, he's a former HPAC President but he's working independently of the association.

2. Like the rest of you assholes Jon NEVER did hook-in checks and he launched with an unhooked passenger and dropped her a thousand feet. Just how much work do you need to do on this one, Sherlock?
Henry is considered one of the pioneers of the sport.
By whom?
Over the past 40 years he has developed many of the safety protocols and aviation techniques used in the sport today.
1. Name ONE.
2. Quote him using "hook-in check" in a sentence.
"He has flown huge distances...
Big fucking deal.
...and yet he's one of those finicky, particular pilots that always stays committed to safety," said Nance...
Bullshit.
...adding he really stresses the importance of the pre-flight check.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13132
Unhooked Death Again - Change our Methods Now?
JBBenson - 2009/01/25 16:27:19 UTC

I get what Tad is saying, but it took some translation:
HANG CHECK is part of the preflight, to verify that all the harness lines etc. are straight.
HOOK-IN CHECK is to verify connection to the glider five seconds before takeoff.
They are separate actions, neither interchangeable nor meant to replace one another. They are not two ways to do the same thing.
EXACTLY.
Although Busby said he knows people are curious to learn whether it was pilot error or equipment malfunction that was responsible for Godinez-Avila's death, they'll have to wait just a bit longer.
I've got a hundred bucks that says it was equipment malfunction and Jon swallowed the card out of loyalty to the manufacturer. Who wants to match me?
The trial for Orders is expected to get underway April 15, 2013.
And after that has come to a conclusion and all the appeals are exhausted the report can be released so that everyone using the same defective equipment which precipitated this unforeseeable tragedy can get it replaced.

Assholes.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: You are NEVER hooked in.

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26800
Post subject: Sport 2 VG lessons learned IMHO!
Terry Strahl - 2012/08/05 22:41:13 UTC

Sport 2 VG lessons learned IMHO!
I have got thirty plus launches on my S2 so far.
What I have learned over this last year.
Fort Funston when blowing anything over 13 with gusts I have at least a quarter if not half VG pulled (Thank you Urs).
It makes handling the glider much easier than letting it slap around from left to right.
McClure when rowdy the same.
When it's light and variable zero to a quarter VG.
Towing at least a third to half on my wing.
I have found with no to little VG on my S2 it can get a tricky real fast. The last Hat Creek trip I was reminded why pulling the VG is so important before I launch.
My .00009 cents.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip2bnzs2ljw
Mike Bastan - 2012/08/06 05:15:00 UTC
Los Angeles

Slightly OT but I think you transitioned a bit too soon with your right hand to the base tube. I would have waited until well away from the mountain.
Christopher LeFay - 2012/08/06 05:30:55 UTC

FYI: training yourself to transition in the first second of launch will kill you eventually. You'll have it so wired in that when things go to hell you'll be halfway there before you can do anything about it. Stop now. Fly five seconds away from launch, keep running in the air - it's the only way to be sure you will do such when you must, and remain the same shape you've grown accustomed to.
Yeah Christopher, thanks for reminding us how deadly it is to transfer one's hands to the basetube immediately upon getting airborne. So many people have been killed as a consequence of establishing that routine. The glider will be going into a hard roll in that first second after launch and the pilot will be able to do nothing about it 'cause one of his hands will be in the process of transitioning.

But didn't you admire the classic Greblo hook-in check?
- Turn and learn in the staging area just prior to launch.
- Proceed to launch position.
- Set the glider down.
- Clear the nose man.
- Pick back up.
- Trim.
- Wait for a cycle.
- Run off the mountain.

At least we can have the same confidence that he does that neither he nor his daughter will over launch unhooked.
Post Reply