instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27073
Hang Gliding Training Manual by Dennis Pagan
Felix Cantesanu - 2012/09/09 02:48:24 UTC
Baltimore

I am on the second book by Dennis Pagen and like the first one I cannot put it down.
Have you tried nicotine patches?
I went back to the first one many times (and will do that more I'm sure).
Which says what about the legitimacy of the information?
Easy to understand, smart...
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22660
What can be learned from this "scooter" towing accident?
Mitch Shipley - 2011/01/31 15:22:59 UTC

Enjoy your posts, as always, and find your comments solid, based on hundreds of hours / tows of experience and backed up by a keen intellect/knowledge of the issues when it comes to most things in general and hang gliding AT/Towing in particular. Wanted to go on record in case anyone reading wanted to know one persons comments they should give weight to.
a wealth of information...
Some of which actually jibes with reality. Your mission, should you choose to accept it...
The books are worth every penny.
In Canada maybe.
Besides, I'm of the opinion that if you don't have something positive to say don't say anything...
- Yeah, that's exactly what Bob Kuczewski means when he says:

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/faq.php
Frequently Asked Questions
What will keep the US Hawks from becoming another USHPA or HGAA?
You will ... hopefully. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Everyone has to do their part once in a while. If you see something that's not being done correctly, then it's your duty to speak out. One big difference between the US Hawks and other organizations is that the US Hawks really does honor the free speech of its members.
And that's exactly what Jack Axaopoulos means when he says:

http://www.hanggliding.org/wiki/HG_ORG_Mission_Statement
HG ORG Mission Statement - Hang Gliding Wiki
Please treat the admin as a regular user. As long as you follow the rules, there is NO CHANCE you will banned because you disagree with the admin. The admin would like to be part of this community too without having to walk on egg shells because people think his word holds more weight for whatever reason. It does not. But the admin will do his job as moderator when he has to. But please follow the rules and don't make him do it, he doesn't enjoy that part. :)
I see a great future for you in this sport. You can be a friend to every pilot you meet and have the kind of positive impact on this sport that guys like Rob Kells and Martin Henry have had.

- I'm of the opinion that if you read the kind of rot that evil pieces of shit like Rooney, Davis, Jack, Matt, Ryan, Dr. Trisa Tilletti, and Dennis and Bill write and stay silent you're not much - if any - better that they are.
Just my 2c.
Did you get an appraiser to look at that figure?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27073
Hang Gliding Training Manual by Dennis Pagan
michael170 - 2012/09/09 05:25:48 UTC
Felix Cantesanu - 2012/09/09 02:48:24 UTC

Besides, I'm of the opinion that if you don't have something positive to say don't say anything...
Dennis Pagen is full of shit, how's that?
Pretty good, I too am positive he's full of shit.
That'll look neater if truncated to:
2012/09/09 07:24:32 UTC - Sink This -- Paul Walsh
mrcc - 2012/09/09 05:38:24 UTC
Auckland

You have to be one arrogant individual, to not give credit to an individual who has contributed so much to this sport.
- Or you can be one arrogant individual who's done his homework and knows the score.

- Tell me how different this sport would look today if Dennis had immersed himself in another hobby. Once we had the basic hang glider design from John Dickenson and the concept that we should be routing tow tension through the pilot from Brian Pattenden EVERYTHING we needed to know to do this right - which, thanks to assholes like Dennis, we still don't - had been available from sailplaning decades before Dennis was born.

- This sport advances ONLY through:
-- hardware innovation
-- getting people to understand that it's dangerous to:
--- foot launch:
---- and land
---- on the assumption that one is hooked in

Dennis has been a major impediment to all of the above.
Especially when he started doing this before some pilots were even born.
Gimme someone who was born yesterday and is interested in fixing problems instead of helping USHGA make them Standard Operating Procedures.
Glad you enjoying reading & learning, we all have so much to learn !
Image
- Some of us have learned WAY more than others.

- The vast majority of the assholes in this sport are totally incapable of getting a grip on or attaching any significance to the concept of two plus two equals four.

- The folk who do get two plus two equals four can figure out exactly what Dennis has done.
2012/09/09 07:37:26 UTC - 3 thumbs up - Paul Walsh
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27073
Hang Gliding Training Manual by Dennis Pagan
John Fritsche - 2012/09/09 06:52:07 UTC
Lompoc

I've found Pagen to be a pleasure to read when he is discussing simple skills and techniques; he's clear, concise, direct.
Fine. Use him for simple skills and techniques. There's no cultural misunderstanding of or controversy about simple skills and techniques.
Most of his latest series of articles in HG mag. have been pretty good.
I wouldn't know. I don't read him any more 'cause, from long experience, I know that with respect to the sport's major defects he's a huge problem and will NEVER do ANYTHING on the solution end of things.
I did a balloon drop once with no other guidance than Pagen gave in his old-a$$ book Hang Gliding Flying Skills. It went perfectly.
- It's not in Hang Gliding Flying Skills - it's in Performance Flying.

- The chapter is a total plagiarization of John Heiney's article in the 1992/11 issue of Hang Gliding with nothing in the way of improvement.

- If you want to do a balloon drop with the best equipment on the planet...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8334800121/
Image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8334801125/
Image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8335870528/
Image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8335863148/
Image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8334819149/
Image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8335879222/
Image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8335875764/
Image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8335882936/
Image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8335885174/
Image

...get in touch with Yours Truly.

From that chapter in Performance Flying:
When you are dropping fast enough, the technique John Heiney suggests is to untape the release line, put in in your mouth so you can have both hands on the control bar, hold the bar into your stomach (dive position) and rotate downwards to release.
- So a world champion aerobatic pilot thinks that under a balloon in dead air at a couple of thousand feet there's some safety advantage to being able to release with BOTH hands on the basetube.

- But NOWHERE in Dennis's writings is there the slightest hint of there being any advantage whatsoever to being able to release with both hands on the basetube coming off the surface in violent thermal conditions and nowhere in his writings is there a reference to any equipment that allows one a reasonable expectation of being able to effect it. Don't you find that a bit odd?

Here's what you wrote about the Wallaby Release depicted on the back cover of Towing Aloft and illustrated, described, referenced, and, for all intents and purposes, heavily endorsed within.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14221
Tad's release
John Fritsche - 2008/12/12 05:38:02 UTC

Do people still use those (IMO, stupid) releases that involve bicycle brakes?
Here's what the other coauthor wrote about those stupid releases that involve bicycle brakes six years and three months after publication of Towing Aloft:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/skysailingtowing/message/4049
Towing errata
Bill Bryden - 2004/04/01 16:20:18 UTC

Some aerotow releases, including a few models from prominent schools, have had problems releasing under high tensions. You must VERIFY through tests that a release will work for the tensions that could possibly be encountered. You better figure at least three hundred pounds to be modestly confident.

Maybe eight to ten years ago I got several comments from people saying a popular aerotow release (with a bicycle type brake lever) would fail to release at higher tensions. I called and talked to the producer sharing the people's experiences and concerns. I inquired to what tension their releases were tested but he refused to say, just aggressively stated they never had any problems with their releases, they were fine, goodbye, click. Another person tested one and found it started getting really hard to actuate in the range of only eighty to a hundred pounds as I vaguely recall. I noticed they did modify their design but I don't know if they ever really did any engineering tests on it. You should test the release yourself or have someone you trust do it. There is only one aerotow release manufacturer whose product I'd have reasonable confidence in without verifying it myself, the Wallaby release is not it.
Those stupid releases that involve bicycle brakes that people almost exclusively still use for two point aerotowing fail in the air ALL THE TIME and HAVE crashed and killed people for extremely obvious reasons.

But...
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

The towline release is a critically important piece of equipment. It is the device which frees you from the towline and it must be failure-proof. Numerous designs have evolved over the years--some very good and some not so good. Unfortunately, releases are items that many pilots feel they can make at home or adapt from something they have seen at the hardware store. Two fatalities have occurred in the past 5 years directly related to failures of very poorly constructed and maintained releases. For the sake of safety, only use releases that have been designed and extensively tested by reputable manufacturers.
For the sake of safety, only use releases that have been "designed" and attained huge track records at operations that tell you that they've been involved in perfecting aerotowing for nearly twenty years.

For the love o' God don't even look at anything that Tad's developed...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=11497
Aerotow release options?
John Glime - 2009/04/13 18:09:32 UTC

Not being constructive? There is one person who has put more thought and time into releases than anyone. That person is Tad. He explains the pros and cons to every release out there. I gave you the link to more release information than the average person could ever digest, and I didn't get a thank you. Just you bitching that we aren't being constructive. What more could you want? He has created something that is a solution, but no one is using it... apparently you aren't interested either. So what gives??? What do you want us to tell you? Your concerns echo Tad's concerns, so why not use his system? Every other system out there has known flaws.
...'cause he's not a reputable manufacturer.
Where he gets technical and complicated (when he becomes Dense Pages) about more obscure stuff and throws in all kinds of illustrations/graphs, I don't read it, and I don't think I've missed anything essential...
Meaning he's just fine on the simple skills and techniques that nobody with half a brain or better is having any trouble with anyway but you don't have a fuckin' clue as to whether or not he has a fuckin' clue what he's talking about on issues of the fundamental theory upon which we base some of our simple skills and techniques.

And if you DO read the more obscure stuff with all kinds of illustrations/graphs thrown in...
Dennis Pagen - 1982/06

Dear Donnell,

It was with great interest that I read your letter and publication on "Skyting". Your analysis of the forces involved in the towing situation satisfied my technical curiosity and let me know you have done your homework.
...you realize that sometimes he DOESN'T have a fuckin' clue - which is why when you look in the index of Towing Aloft you'll find five references for the Skyting bridle and zero references for instant hands free releases - other than weak links, of course.
...but I bet there's more scientific-minded pilots that just eat that s@#t up.
But you don't actually KNOW any scientific-minded pilots, right?
Wanna hear what some scientific-minded pilots have to say about that s@#t?
Kite Strings
A forum devoted to the scientific advancement of hang gliding
2012/09/09 07:37:14 UTC - 3 thumbs up - Paul Walsh
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27073
Hang Gliding Training Manual by Dennis Pagan
Paul Walsh - 2012/09/09 07:35:18 UTC

Brainfart of the month
Fred Wilson set a pretty high bar for Brainfart of the Month to beat three days ago when he recommended Dennis's Book and the Canadian and New Zealand towing procedures manuals all in the same post.
Michael170.
You are being a consistent winder upper. Thats fine, I think the forum are getting wise to your ever weaker ploys to antagonise.
- Last time I looked "thats" required an apostrophe somewhere and "forum" was singular.
- "I think" and "getting wise"? Yeah, right.
Get on with it.
Yes Michael. PLEASE do.
If you are so far out of whack that you genuinely believe your own crap.
- If you are so far out of whack that you genuinely believe your own crap, WHAT? That's not a sentence.

- Fuck you. Michael wasn't the first person in this thread to say that Pagen was the second best author out there - in comparison to any other author. So maybe Dennis deserves a little closer scrutiny before any of his critics are condemned.
You will end up decorating a hillside or worse.
Don't hold your breath, asshole.
I'm sure we will all be very sad. Image Image Image
And I'm one hundred percent certain that one of you Jack Show motherfuckers will be decorating a hillside or worse many decades before Michael does for an easily preventable reason that Michael predicted.

And I'm also one hundred percent certain that WHEN one of you useless Jack Show motherfuckers decorates a hillside or worse none of you useless Jack Show motherfuckers will do a goddam thing to reduce the likelihood of a rerun 'cause you'll all be too busy taking flights in his memory and honor and talking about how sometimes shit just happens.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27073
Hang Gliding Training Manual by Dennis Pagan
Allen Sparks - 2012/09/09 14:11:37 UTC
mrcc - 2012/09/07 23:41:57 UTC

I differ to say, his series of publication on HG are the best currently out there in the market place. For both new & older pilots.
Ditto !!
Go ahead and throw your lot in with the dregs, Allen. Nothing new here.
Dennis Wood - 2012/09/07 17:02:45 UTC

enough already!!! Dennis' book, like all other similar tomes, requires a translator. this translator is available at most HG schools, and is known as an "instructor". without said translator, these volumes could be dangerous to your health. with "instructor" by your side, these books are invaluable, as no one student is capable of surviving all the possible mistakes presented to a dang noob.
I agree.

I had no instructor. I read Dennis's first edition of his first book (May 1976) from a library, and that was my initial instruction.
I'm having a REAL hard time understanding how you agree with shithead peanuts and then state the precise opposite of his idiot false statement.
Dennis has my utmost respect.
Yeah?

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=4046
Accident Report
Doug Koch - 2007/10/20 15:42:57 UTC
Las Vegas

He signaled the driver to start the tow, became airborne and again went into a left turn. The driver saw this and released pressure on the rig. The pilot got the glider leveled off and released the tow line. He started to come in to land and at about twenty to thirty feet suddenly dropped from the glider. As he was in a semi-prone attitude he came down at an angle of a few degrees and impacted the ground on both feet and then fell forward on his face.

The impact broke both legs at the ankles and drove his shin bones out the bottom of his feet six inches.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=17330
Take your flying--seriously--OR....
Bille Floyd - 2010/05/26 03:27:41 UTC

I signaled the driver and the tow was on.
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2800
Vegas HG Accident
Allen Sparks - 2007/10/30 23:45:29 UTC

IMO the real topic of this bifurcated / twisted thread is that my buddy screwed up, got hurt bad and is permanently disabled. Not only did he screw up, but he didn't have a knowlegable/responsible flying buddy looking over his shoulder to help him out. Kinda like self-launching or flying alone ... one little thing becomes a life-changing event.
So HOW did your buddy signal the driver?
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

Solo Aerotow Signals

Start tow -- The glider pilot either nods his head or kicks the left leg to the side (when standing) once he or she is in takeoff position and wings are balanced. The tug pilot pauses for two seconds and then applies full power.
Did he kick his left leg to the side or, while he still had one...

http://ozreport.com/forum/files/copy_2_of_imgp1239_197.jpg
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7220/13949046702_ccfa0fafab_o.png
Image
http://www.thekiteboarder.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/opener-532x800.jpg

...stamp his left foot...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1ZTAEkSY0k


...a couple of times to signal that he was sure he was hooked in and ready to go?

Did he nod his head...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0lvH-KxGlQ


...or turn it full left and right to signal that he was sure he was hooked in and ready to go?

Did he say "clear" or "all out" to his launch assistant...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u51qpPLz5U0

07-0913
Image
Image
11-1118

...who signaled the driver - who waited two seconds and then applied full power - that he was ready to go because, at a Davis Straub / David Glover meet, no one gets into a harness unless it's connected to a glider?

I'll tell ya what he didn't do to signal the driver to start the tow.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hhpa/message/11222
Question
Tad Eareckson - 2010/10/25 15:00:11 UTC

I'd like to know one single half-baked reason from any of the freakin' morons who've been involved in foot launch towing for any or all of the past thirty years why they don't use a double lift and tug as THE UNIVERSAL AND ONLY ACCEPTABLE *GO* SIGNAL.

Nobody TOUCHES a throttle or gas pedal before seeing the double pump. If there's a five second delay 'cause of a gust he's gotta see it again. If anyone EVER violates that protocol for ANY reason he gets a hand or foot cut off - or has to throw a hundred bucks into the beer jar.

Y'all could COMPLETELY eliminate ANY possibility of a recurrence, train and condition your pilots to do things right for when they launch from the ramp, and set an example for the rest of the world to follow.

But... you won't. You'll keep on doing things the way you've always done them 'cause that's the way you've always done them. And the way you've always done them ALMOST ALWAYS WORKS. So why even bother trying to shave off another tiny fraction of a percent?
So WHY does Dennis have your utmost respect?
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

Hang Glider Foot Launch Checklist

Check:

01. To assure the launch procedures and flight plans have been reviewed with the tow team.
02. The protective equipment including helmet, gloves, eye protection, hook knife, etc. to make sure they are adequate and in place.
03. To assure the preflight inspections have been completed.
04. The harness for leg straps and locked carabiner.
05. Perform a hang check.
06. The tow bridle, release and fresh weak link for integrity and proper connection.
07. The towline retrieval chute, if used, for proper rigging.
08. To assure the tow team checks have been completed and the team is ready.
09. The air traffic. The marshal and other pilots should help here.
10. The conditions. Make sure the wind is light enough, smooth enough and straight enough for a safe tow.

When ready, issue the command, "clear" or "all out."
'Cause he tells you to perform a hang check before checking: the tow bridle, release and fresh weak link for integrity and proper connection; the towline retrieval chute, if used, for proper rigging; to assure the tow team checks have been completed and the team is ready; the air traffic; and the conditions to make sure the wind is light, smooth and straight for a safe tow and, when ready, issuing the command "clear" or "all out"?

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2800
Vegas HG Accident
Allen Sparks - 2007/10/30 23:45:29 UTC

My big take-home lesson is that we need backups for our backups, 'cause we will all eventually screw up ... more than once.
The other related one is ... we can and should be 'backups' for each other. It can make a big difference.
'nuf said.
If that was enough said 'cause that was enough to make everybody have enough backups for their backups and got everybody acting as backups for each other then how come Martin Apopot, B Asher, and Greg Jones subsequently had good wake-up calls and Kunio Yoshimura, Yossi Tsarfaty, Lenami Godinez-Avila are dead?

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=18876
Hang glider Crash
Helen McKerral - 2010/09/04 23:05:06 UTC

I'm almost afraid to mention this... four words:
"Tad's Lift and Tug."
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=18876
Hang glider Crash
Allen Sparks - 2010/09/07 01:03:18 UTC

Oscar,

I'm very happy you weren't injured.

Helen,

Thanks for the Tad 'lift and tug' reminder.

I have launched unhooked and experienced the horror of hanging by my fingers over jagged rocks ... and the surreal result - i.e. not being significantly injured.

I am a firm believer in 'lift and tug' and the mindset of assuming I am not hooked in. It is motivated by the recurring memory of my own experience ... and the tragic deaths and life-altering injuries of good friends.
Who's been working his ass off for years to push the hook-in check message and who put out a half-baked article in the magazine at the beginning of 1994 and hasn't uttered a single word on the issue prior to or in the wake of any of the death and destruction that's occurred since?

There are currently 416 posts on the "You are NEVER hooked in." thread here on Kite Strings - the vast majority of them mine - and it's got over four and a half thousand hits.

And THAT motherfucker has your utmost respect?

I sure hope I never get it from you, Allen. If I do I'll hafta do some serious thinking about where and how I started going wrong.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27073
Hang Gliding Training Manual by Dennis Pagan
Fred Bickford - 2012/09/09 18:33:48 UTC

FYI, there are some better books on understanding soaring flight from the sailplane pilot communities. Image
Well yeah, but...

- Sailplanes:

-- are controlled with a yoke and rudder pedals; hang gliders are weight-shift controlled

-- roll up to airspeed for takeoff; hang gliders are foot launched (until you master foot launching, then you're allowed to roll up to airspeed for takeoff)

-- roll their landings in at airports and fields; hang gliders land only in narrow dry riverbeds with large rocks strewn all over the place and fields filled with seven foot high corn and therefore must do nothing but standup no-steppers

-- use releases to release from tow in normal and emergency situations; hang gliders occasionally use releases to release from tow under carefully controlled conditions but weak links when they're a bit out of whack or worse

-- use weak links to protect their aircraft from overloading; hang gliders use weak links to prevent tug control issues, rapid acceleration at launch, high angles of attack, lockouts, stalls, decisive control inputs, conducting operations in good thermal conditions, dragging following blown launch impacts, and match the comfort levels of glider and tug pilots, tow park operators, and competition directors

-- use certified, complex, built-in release systems which work; hang gliders use simple, slap-on release systems from reputable manufacturers with long track records which aren't warranted for towing anything

- Sailplane towlines transmit tension; hang glider towlines transmit pressure.

- When a tension is transmitted to a sailplane its pitch attitude increases; when pressure is transmitted to a hang glider its angle of attack increases.

So I'd think it would be pretty freakin' obvious that ya can't just use conventional aviation books to to really understand hang gliding. I shudder to think what would've happened to this sport had Dennis not been there to fill the void.
mrcc - 2012/09/09 23:37:07 UTC

There are some better books on understanding power flying, but this HG isn't it ?
Right. There are no books on sailplaning.
Fred Bickford - 2012/09/10 01:51 UTC

Where do you think he learned from?
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

A manual of this scope entails gathering information from many sources. No single individual can posses all the necessary experience covering all the facets of towing. Therefore we are greatly indebted to those developers, instructors, manufacturers and experimenters who have brought us modern towing and have shared their insights. We especially thank Gerard Thevenot for teaching us to aerotow, Wallaby Ranch for refining our skills and Raven Hang Gliding for their helpful input. We also owe a debt of gratitude to Wayne Sayer, the Wallaby Ranch, and Raven Hang Gliding for proofreading the manuscript.

Individuals such as Donnell Hewett, Dave Broyles, Lars Linde, Mike Robertson, Brad Kushner, Malcolm Jones, David Glover, Greg McNamee, Jan Alda, Alan Chuculate and Bill Moyes have also offered specific information either through their writing or by personal communication. Finally we wish to thank individuals and operations who have generously contributed photos to our project. John Heiney, Brad Kushner, Miami Hang Gliding, Kitty Hawk Kites, Moyes Delta Gliders and Wallaby Ranch especially provided a multitude of great images. Their work has enhanced this book tremendously.
The people who sell his books and want them to reflect the deadly rot...

http://www.wallaby.com/aerotow_primer.php
Aerotow Primer for Experienced Pilots
The Wallaby Ranch Aerotowing Primer for Experienced Pilots - 2012/09/10

If you fail to maintain the correct tow position (centered, with the wheels of the tug on the horizon), the weak link will break before you can get into too much trouble.
Towing Aloft - 1998/10

Speed controlled towing is when the speed of the device doing the towing is maintained at a reasonably constant value. Controls, such as throttle, are used to keep the speed of the tow vehicle or tow winch operating at a constant speed. Towline tension can vary dramatically in response to thermals, sink, pilot corrections, etc. Aerotowing is clearly in this category as the tug needs to maintain a minimum speed to prevent stalling. Many of the early towing efforts of the '70s where the vehicle drove at a fixed speed would also fall into this category. Weak links very clearly will provide protection from excessive angles of attack, high bank turns and the like for this form of towing.
...they're teaching their students and promote the deadly crap...
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

The towline release is a critically important piece of equipment. It is the device which frees you from the towline and it must be failure-proof. Numerous designs have evolved over the years--some very good and some not so good. Unfortunately, releases are items that many pilots feel they can make at home or adapt from something they have seen at the hardware store. Two fatalities have occurred in the past 5 years directly related to failures of very poorly constructed and maintained releases. For the sake of safety, only use releases that have been designed and extensively tested by reputable manufacturers. Listed below are various types of releases available with their attributes and applications.

Provided in Appendix III is a performance test specification for towline releases. This is not presented to give you guidelines for making your own, but rather to make you aware of the requirements of a good release in order to select and purchase good equipment (See Appendix IV).
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=11497
Aerotow release options?
Axel Banchero - 2009/06/20 04:57:01 UTC

But I have seen others fail twice and one of them was during one of my training tandems. I just kept hitting the brake lever for a few seconds in WTF mode, and the instructor used the barrel release. The other one I saw failing was another tandem. The release just opened when they took off, around fifty feet up.
...they're passing off as equipment.
Granted we utilize smaller air masses than sailplanes...
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3107
I have a tandem rating!!!
Lauren Tjaden - 2008/03/23 22:20:15 UTC

When Jim got me locked out to the right, I couldn't keep the pitch of the glider with one hand for more than a second (the pressure was a zillion pounds, more or less), but the F'ing release slid around when I tried to hit it. The barrel release wouldn't work because we had too much pressure on it.

Anyhow, the tandem can indeed perform big wingovers, as I demonstrated when I finally got separated from the tug.
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3648
Oh no! more on weak links
Carlos Weill - 2008/11/30 19:24:09 UTC

On June of 2008 during a fast tow, I noticed I was getting out of alignment, but I was able to come back to it. The second time it happen I saw the tug line 45 deg off to the left and was not able to align the glider again I tried to release but my body was off centered and could not reach the release. I kept trying and was close to 90 deg. All these happen very quickly, as anyone that has experienced a lock out would tell you. I heard a snap, and then just like the sound of a WWII plane just shut down hurdling to the ground, only the ball of fire was missing. The tug weak link broke off at 1000ft, in less than a second the glider was at 500ft.
Sometimes.
...but for the most part books written decades ago apply thoroughly to the present day. I've read Performance Flying, Understanding the Sky, and as much of Secrets of Champions I could stomach, for reference.
Don't forget Towing Aloft for a really reliable induced vomit.
Fred Bickford - 2012/09/10 02:18 UTC

Overall, you need to be able to assess for yourself equipment and soaring conditions.
Yeah. Hang glider jockeys are really great at assessing equipment.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21033
barrels release without any tension except weight of rope..
Bart Weghorst - 2011/02/25 19:06:26 UTC

But I've had it once where the pin had bent inside the barrel from excessive tow force. My weaklink was still intact. The tug pilot's weaklink broke so I had the rope. I had to use two hands to get the pin out of the barrel.
No stress because I was high.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Davis Straub - 2011/08/26 14:04:52 UTC

We had six weaklink breaks in a row at Zapata this year.
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3391
More on Zapata and weak link
Paul Tjaden - 2008/07/22 04:32:22 UTC

I have never had a lockout situation happen so quickly and dramatically and had no chance to release as I have always thought I could do.
But as long as you're high enough in soaring conditions...
Joe Gregor - 2004/09

There is no evidence that the pilot made an attempt to release from tow prior to the weak link break, the gate was found closed on the Wallaby-style tow release.
...equipment really isn't that much of an issue anyway.
For the amount of preventable deaths accrued and his obtuse popularization I have no admiration.
That's OK, Sparky's got enough admiration to make up for the deficit ten times over. Yours won't really be missed.
Approach reading his books and publications scientifically for your own sake and the rest of our community and don't take this sport for granted!
Nah, just go with what peanuts and Mitch Shipley are telling everybody.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22660
What can be learned from this "scooter" towing accident?
Mitch Shipley - 2011/01/31 15:22:59 UTC

Enjoy your posts, as always, and find your comments solid, based on hundreds of hours / tows of experience and backed up by a keen intellect/knowledge of the issues when it comes to most things in general and hang gliding AT/Towing in particular. Wanted to go on record in case anyone reading wanted to know one persons comments they should give weight to.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 21:40:25 UTC

First, I sent Steve a bunch of info offline. Hopefully it clears things up a bit for him.
Unfortunately, he's stumbled onto some of Tad's old rantings and got suckered in. So most of this was just the same old story of debunking Tad's lunacy... again .

See, the thing is... "we", the people that work at and run aerotow parks, have a long track record.
This stuff isn't new, and has been slowly refined over decades.
We have done quite literally hundreds of thousands of tows.
We know what we're doing.

Sure "there's always room for improvement", but you have to realize the depth of experience you're dealing with here.
But if you don't want to listen to the folks who are always telling everyone they actually know what they're talking about...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Kinsley Sykes - 2011/08/31 11:35:36 UTC

Well actually he didn't. But if you don't want to listen to the folks that actually know what they are talking about, go ahead.

Feel free to go the the tow park that Tad runs...
...feel free to go the tow park that Tad runs.

P.S. These last two little gems of posts of Fred Bickford's - 2012/09/10 01:51 and 02:18 UTC - disappeared from the Jack Show record a very short time after posting. In a forum in which reality is determined by what Jack and his handpicked douchebags decide what's best for the interests of the industry and themselves that's not terribly surprising.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Hang Gliding - 1989/01

RULES TO LIVE BY
What Your Mother Never Told You
Part II in a Three-Part Series on Safety

article and illustrations by Dennis Pagen

A LITTLE BACKGROUND

In the process of researching and writing a new book to replace Hang Gliding Flying Skills, I realized the need to provide students and experienced pilots alike with a standard set of rules as safety guidelines. These rules did not exist except in a few instructors' minds and as a randomly accessed vague cloud of wisdom that would wax and wane along with the ozone. I wrote them down and presented them to the instructors at the last Hang Gliding Dealers Association meeting as well as to Michael Robertson, chief roustabout of the Canadian instruction program. After a bit of discussion we settled on the rules that follow.

These rules are, of course, not perfect or all inclusive. However, we have tried to refine some safety ideas into little nuggets that are easy to remember and dependable. For purposes of utilization I have listed rules first, followed by discussion and explanation. So cut them out or copy them to read every night before you go to bed. Better yet, tape them to your control bar to read as you fly along.

1) Perform a hook-in check within 15 seconds of taking off.

RULE 1: The problem with pilots taking off unhooked continues. The situation seems to be caused by distractions resulting from fear, soaring anticipation, cameras, or spectators. If any of these factors are around, use extreme caution. Always perform a personal check by looking at your attached carabiner and lifting to feel your tightened support straps just before running, if possible.

FOLLOWING THE RULES

The first question everyone will have is: "Do these rules apply to me?" We tried to create guidelines that could be used by most pilots in most situations. In fact, 99% of our flying should be within these guidelines.

If you are a Beginner you should consider these rules to be inviolate.

If you are a Novice you should follow them invariably.

If you are an Intermediate-rated pilot you should follow these rules with care.

If you are Advanced you should treat them with respect.

If you are worthy of being Master rated you have already been following these rules.

You may detect that we begin to allow some leeway at the Advanced level, or maybe at the Intermediate level nearing Advanced. This is where mature judgement comes in, and of course that can be a problem at any stage. If you have a great urge to break any of these rules you probably shouldn't. Some rules should always be observed due to the realities of physics and human nature. Rules 1,2,4,5,16,18,20,21,23 and 25 come to mind in this case.

An early guideline for hang gliding was: "Never fly higher than you care to fall." We quickly realized how limiting this rule was. And so the guidelines presented here may also become obsolete, but for now their observance can actually be liberating if we consider the limits imposed by our own fear and ignorance in the face of unknown dangers. Fly safely, with these simple rules to live by, and you can tell your mother not to worry.
So RULE 1...
With each flight, demonstrates a method of establishing that the pilot is hooked in just prior to launch.
...for all flights of all ratings, that's been on the books since 1981/05, the better part of eight years, while the USHGA Accident Review Committee Chairman has been screaming for compliance and getting totally ignored by assholes like Mike Robertson and Dennis Pagen, isn't a USHGA REGULATION. It's just a quaint bit of lore that only existed in a few instructors' minds and as a randomly accessed vague cloud of wisdom that would wax and wane along with the ozone.

Must've been 'cause in neither the 1982/06/02-03 instructor certification clinic I attended with Mike, eleven months after the regulation went into effect, nor the 1989/06/02-04 clinic I attended with Dennis, five months after publication of RULE 1 in his RULES TO LIVE BY article, was anything vaguely resembling RULE 1 referred to. Ditto with respect to the 1994/04-06 clinic I attended with Mike.

And then:

- on the morning of 1993/09/28 Dennis sends his glider to the pond in the Morningside LZ without him.

- three months later Dennis publishes this:

http://www.kitestrings.org/post273.html#p273

article in Hang Gliding magazine. It starts off:
Dennis Pagen - 1994/01

Forgetting to hook in before taking off has been a serious problem since the beginning of our sport. To solve this problem we popularized pre-launch hang checks. After losing a couple of friends in the early years to the failure-to-hook-in syndrome, I realized that such a mistake seems to be related to a quirk of human nature. Having a quirky nature myself, I further realized that I am not immune to such a mistake. So I resolved to avoid distraction, excess haste and excitement at launch and to always perform a hang check. For the past season I also added what Pat Denevan calls the hook-in check which consists of lifting the glider until the tug of the harness is felt and saying "hooked in" out loud.
And that tells you IN NO UNCERTAIN terms that Dennis had never in the previous nineteen years of his flying career - including the eleven plus during which it had been a mandatory element of every launch - performed "what Pat Denevan calls the hook-in check".

And it also makes one seriously question whether Dennis had even *READ* RULE 1 in his RULES TO LIVE BY article five years earlier - let alone written what he wrote.

He's been doing HANG CHECKS and NOTHING but HANG CHECKS. Either he or his ghost writer has been telling everybody to do one thing while he's been doing something else. Same way in Towning Aloft - Appendix III he tells everyone to run brutal load tests on all their releases and then goes up with Wallaby, Lockout, and Bailey crap that can't be blown open with C-4 when the shit hits the fan.

Note also that he has NEVER written anything on the hook-in check issue after somebody who wasn't him has been splattered all over a slope or runway - he only writes about it after he twists his ankle on this one.

Jump ahead nineteen months until the day after Bill Priday has been splattered all over the slope wind dummying for the first round of the 2005 Tennessee Tree Toppers Team Challenge.

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1149
Team Challenge: Daily Update Thread
Scott Wilkinson - 2005/10/02 15:09:27 UTC

Team Challenge, Day Two...

It was decided that the meet will go on today. Everyone felt, as Dennis Pagen eloquently put it, that flying for all of us is an affirmation of life, and that flying is how best to commemorate Bill and move past his death. Conditions look good for another Whitwell day, with clear skies and E-SE winds.
Did Dennis pull meet-head and hang check zombie Dean Funk aside the evening prior to the start of competition and say...

"Listen dude. We're gonna be launching a lot of gliders off of some very steep cliffs in the course of this event. I think it would be a REAL GOOD idea to make USHGA's mandatory hook-in check procedure mandatory. Advise all participants that if they launch without hook-in checks - within five seconds of moving a foot - they will no longer be participants."

That was PRECISELY the rule that Mother Nature enforced on Bill and she enforced it in such a brutal no-appeal manner that none of the other participants participated for that day and a bunch of other participants were so traumatized that they didn't participate at all in the remainder of the meet and packed up and went home.

And did Dennis pull meet-head and hang check zombie Dean Funk aside the evening after Bill got splattered all over the slope and say...

"Listen dude. We're gonna be launching a lot of gliders off of some very steep cliffs in the course of this event and we just splattered a guy all over the slope before we even got started. I think it would be a REAL GOOD idea to make USHGA's mandatory hook-in check procedure mandatory. Advise all participants that if they launch without hook-in checks - within five seconds of moving a foot - they will no longer be participants.

"And let's have somebody stationed at launch at all times to make sure USHGA's mandatory hook-in check procedure is followed so neither we nor Mother Nature will be eliminating any more participants."

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27073
Hang Gliding Training Manual by Dennis Pagan
Allen Sparks - 2012/09/09 14:11:37 UTC

Dennis has my utmost respect.
Wish my standards were low enough to be able to give my utmost respect to liars, con artists, and serial killers. Sure would make it a lot easier to get along with people in this sport.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Another example of Dennis's incompetence, stupidity, sleaziness, all of the above, whatever (I don't care that much, the results are all the same)...

Relevant / More significant stuff in italics.
Dennis Pagen - 1997/01

Let me begin with the accident involving Bill Bennett and Mike Del Signore which occurred in July (1996/07/25) in Ohio, since this accident seems to be the catalyst which started this recent flurry of discussion. As a good friend of Bill's and recipient of the verbal and written reports of eyewitnesses, I believe I can shed some light on the situation.

However, perhaps more critical was the fact that during the flight that proved fatal, several factors were combined. First, Mike, while a very experienced ground-based tow pilot, was new to aerotowing. Second, Mike was not an experienced tandem pilot. Third, the tug pilot was inexperienced. Fourth the weak link was way too strong. Fifth, the arrangement of the tandem pilots was not ideal, and sixth, the release at the tug end may have malfunctioned.

A significant matter is the fact that Mike was by far the largest pilot Bill was flying with. Not only did this create a very high wing loading on the glider, but Bill was unable to reach the control bar according to some witnesses. Even if he could in normal flight, I believe he could not in the reported situation in which Mike was pushing full-out to climb behind the tug.

Witnesses reported Bill saying that the tow was too slow on their first flight together. Unfortunately, a witness who was standing with the tug pilot between flights indicates this message was never given to the tug pilot. It seems clear from Bill's comment and what happened subsequently that a slow tow combined with heavy loading is what initiated the fatal sequence.

Once the pilots were airborne they remained low on the tug and most likely passed through at least a portion of the tug's wake. This wake is very turbulent and requires constant, hard roll control with a nearly full push-out to climb above. This is not a desirable position to be in, especially close to the ground. The tug pilot can help in this situation by diving to increase the glider's speed. In this case, the inexperienced tug pilot didn't know the proper procedure and cut power to "let the glider catch up." Later he apparently dove to break the weak link, but by this time a lockout was in progress and speeding up makes it worse.

If a tug is going too slow to begin with, there is no way to climb above the wake and the only recourse is to release. I believe he tug's wake turbulence rolled or stalled the hang glider and a lockout rapidly ensued. I am sure Mike did not have the experience to make a quick and timely release decision, and anyway he had his hands full trying to control the glider. Bill was certainly monitoring what was taking place, but without being on the control bar he had no idea what forces and feedback were occurring. I expect the lockout progressed so fast that he had no chance to react once it got serious.

The bridle system used was like that shown in the photograph on page 20 of the September 1996 issue of this magazine. There was only a bottom release. The weak link was at the top end was tested after the accident to break at over 300 pounds (it was constructed from 205 Dacron line). Because of this doubling effect of the bridle, this would require a towline force of over 600 pounds to break. This is way too high. There is no known reason for the failure of the tug release since it was tested before and after the accident with a realistic tow force.
- The maximum certified operating weight of that glider - which was a Pacific Airwave Double Vision - is about 520 pounds and it was loaded to a flying weight of close to that - probably 500.

- A 300 pound weak link on a two point bridle end translates to 522 pounds towline - not 600.

- And he bloody well knows that 'cause it's on Page 57 of his stupid book.

- But let's call it 600. That's 1.20 times actual flying weight or 1.15 times max certified operating weight.

- Big fuckin' deal - that's LIGHTER than people WITH functional brains want.

- But Lord Dennis declares it WAY TOO HIGH.

- But it's 0.8 Gs UNDER the then USHGA/FAA maximum of twice flying weight. (And even more under the current legal max.)

- And even clueless Lord Dennis allows us to fly 1.2 for surface towing in his stupid fucking book.

- And if Lord Dennis thinks that 1.2 is WAY TOO HIGH then why the fuck isn't he raising hell about USHGA's 2.0?

- AND - what one would've hoped would've been OBVIOUS - if the tug's weak link is lighter than the glider's, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT'S ON THE GLIDER. (And by the time of Robin Strid's 2005/01/09 crash the aerotow douchebags still have been unable to figure this out.)

- And WE KNOW the fucking tug's fucking weak link WAS (illegally) lighter than the glider's 'cause IT BLEW while the GLIDER'S HELD.

- We never hear what Dave Farkas had on his end but I one hundred percent guarantee you that it wasn't any heavier than the chintzy crap Dragonflies use.

- When Dennis tells us what the irrelevant glider weak link tested to but says nothing about the tug's is it because he:

-- is really that stupid; or

-- knows he can count on glider jockeys to be that stupid and swallow the USHGA / Flight Park Mafia line that aerotowing is perfectly safe and the only people who get splattered are the ones stupid enough to use strong links which, if you fail to maintain the correct tow position (centered, with the wheels of the tug on the horizon), won't break before you can get into too much trouble?

- Dennis tells us that the release at the tug end MAY HAVE malfunctioned - like during Hurricane Katrina the New Orleans levee system MAY HAVE been a little problematic in certain areas. The fucking release at the tug end DID malfunction. Hell, it didn't FUNCTION *AT* *ALL*. It was a goddam two string directly engaging a locking out five hundred pound TANDEM GLIDER. When I'm flying SOLO I use a FOUR-string to take HALF towline.

- And finally...
There is no known reason for the failure of the tug release since it was tested before and after the accident with a realistic tow force.
-- There is no known reason for the:
--- failure of the:
---- levee system since it was tested before and after the Katrina during substantial afternoon thunderstorms
---- Maginot Line since it was tested before and after the attack for a reasonable invasion
---- Columbia's Thermal Protection System since it was tested before and after the accident with strikes of realistically sized chunks of foam insulation
--- gate to have been found closed on Mike Haas's Wallaby-style tow release since it was tested before and after the accident with a realistic tow force and the release lever was on the right downtube within easy reach - in full compliance with USHGA aerotow equipment regulations.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TUGS/message/1149
aerotow instruction was Re: Tug Rates
Tracy Tillman - 2011/02/10 20:08:32 UTC

Anybody who is truly a good pilot, in any form of aviation, knows that the knowledge, skills, and judgement you have in your head, learned from thorough instruction from a good instructor with a good curriculum, are the best pieces of equipment you can fly with. Good equipment is important, the best equipment is a well-trained brain.
Nope. Nuthin' wrong with the release. It was tested before and after the accident with a realistic tow force. No manufacturer liability here. These guys just didn't keep enough control of the situation to not exceed a realistic tow force.

Six hundred pound weak link on the back, three hundred pound weak link on the front - were talking nine hundred pounds. That's not realistic. Realistic is like one fifty, two hundred. After that an appropriate weak link will kick in.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/09/02 23:09:12 UTC

Remember kids, always blame the equipment.
Put it back up, it's fine. Just stay in the Cone of Safety and always release the towline before there is a problem.

Kroop, Rooney, Tilletti, Taber, Straub, Pagen... These motherfuckers are all pretty much the same.

Dennis is smoother pulling it off than Rooney but Rooney's proven beyond any doubt that it doesn't matter. Regardless of how outrageous and vile is the crap some scumbag is spooning out to the glider jockey population, once one has wormed one's way into a position of authortity these morons will swallow it, declare it to be the finest cavier, and keep begging for more.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27104
The Florida Ridge
Brad Barkley - 2012/09/10 22:33:50 UTC

I have seen a lot of "Quest or Wallaby?" threads on here on the past, but I rarely seen the Ridge thrown into the discussion. How does the Ridge compare to the other two as far as flying, overall vibe, cost, etc? I haven't been to any of the FL parks, but as I wrote in a previous thread, I plan to make a trip this winter.

Thoughts?
For you Brad...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=5089
The Good-The Bad-The Ugly....
Socrates Zayas - 2008/01/14 05:22:38 UTC

When I got there her nose was lacerated and her lip was bleeding (yeah, she had a full face helmet) and the dolly's left wheel was missing.

The radiography showed acute multiple fractures around the top and head of the humerus. Her nose didn't break but she may have hairline fractures to the septum. She had a hard time remembering the date, day, names of her kids, number of kids, and other basic things...

The dolly had hit a huge hole and she went left shoulder into the ground at 25+ mph.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=8719
Bad Aerotow Launch
Axel Banchero - 2008/09/30 19:44:01 UTC

I almost got hurt. And I heard stories of people getting hurt at the same place for the same reason.

I was getting ready in the dolly and took a look ahead. I saw a bump in my runway but didn't care much about it. While my friend assisted me to get ready to launch, I asked him "Is that some taller grass in front of me or is it a bump?" He replied "It's a bump so grab yourself tight on the base bar".

I hit it with the left wheel and the rope in my left hand just snapped off from my fingers. It actually hurt.

Somehow I managed to control the glider and take off without hitting the ground with one of my wingtips.

After I landed, my friend told me the tip of my wing passed about five inches off the ground.
Scott C. Wise - 2008/09/30 23:29:30 UTC

I've still got a problem with that "bump".

This is an active flight park. Don't they do anything to maintain their grounds? I've been at any number of small airports with grass strips and they are flat and level with no holes and no bumps. Somebody actually spends time "grooming" the area - for obvious and serious safety reasons.

How the heck does an aerotow park get off NOT doing a similar or better job? !!!!!
Axel Banchero - 2008/10/01 04:04:47 UTC

Yes, this is the Florida Ridge. Where Doc's wife got hurt after hitting a bump or something like that. I also heard another story with broken bones at the same place in a situation pretty much like mine.
Jim Rooney - 2008/10/02 02:26:20 UTC

Wingspan... what's with the rant?

A) This way over the top stuff does no good
B) You're kinda off base anyway

You got a personal beef with the ridge or something? Cuz that's the vibe I'm getting here. I really can't fathom an other reason for the hyperbolic ravings.

Sheesh
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22660
What can be learned from this "scooter" towing accident?
Mitch Shipley - 2011/01/31 15:22:59 UTC

Enjoy your posts, as always, and find your comments solid, based on hundreds of hours / tows of experience and backed up by a keen intellect/knowledge of the issues when it comes to most things in general and hang gliding AT/Towing in particular. Wanted to go on record in case anyone reading wanted to know one persons comments they should give weight to.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=6911
Sunday flying at Florida ridge. -
Socrates Zayas - 2008/05/21 23:53:23 UTC

At 10:30 Eric came out to tow me to the southwest with the wind SSW. That put me right over the right side of the hangar and parking lot. This is a short section of the field but not all that bad as long as you have an exit strategy. I decided I would NOT continue to double the weak link after seeing my wife eat it a few months ago.

It broke at about ten seconds after hitting 800 fpm lift off the LZ!!! Hell of a cycle. The tug and I went up like rockets. But instantly at 200 feet it wasn't all that bad. I flew the U2 into a nice foot landing right by the cars.

Second try:

This time the wind seemed H&V (heavy and variable) and we decided to take off to the southeast. But this gave us a short runway and an orange orchard in front of us and we decided to take off with a bit more speed.

The cycle was nice, nothing out of the ordinary, but just as the tug flew over the fence line of the orchard the weak link broke. It was as if it didn't even break - Eric and I both thought it was a release malfunction. But Axo, Ralph, and I found the release and confirmed otherwise.

I was flying nice with good speed and climbing. I thought "Shit. It broke again. Damn, I don't want to land between those trees, they don't even have the keys to the gate anymore." So I turned to the right cross wind toward the RVs and campfire spot.
Rafael Castro - 2008/05/23 19:52:57 UTC

We all watched his weak link break, it was non-event something that happens all the time...
Axel Banchero - 2008/05/22 04:19:39 UTC

Doc's body wasn't moving and we were shitting our pants until he started talking confused. The first thing I saw was his eye bleeding and swollen the size of an 8 ball. There was sand and dirt inside. Looked like he lost it at first until he could open it a little bit.
Florida Ridge.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26654
Blown Loop at Funston
NMERider - 2012/09/08 03:50:03 UTC

Leo, I'm glad to hear that Art (Thompson) will recover but how's Eric Mies doing? What's really frightening is how fast we all forget about pilots who have been crippled or killed. IMHO, the serious injury/fatality rate in this sport is needlessly high and under-reported.
Post Reply