instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27243
First flight on Sport 2
Red Howard - 2012/09/29 01:10:25 UTC

Well, okay, you got away with it. Got a minute? We need to talk.
This isn't somebody you really wanna be talking to, Jesse.
If the glider was not flying at a good trim speed, hands-off, I would guess that the former owner was not the same weight as you...
Stop guessing at stuff, Red. This is total bullshit. If the former owner hooked in at 250 and trimmed three miles per hour over stall and Jesse hooked in at 150 he would also be three miles per hour over stall. The only thing different would be that Jesse would stall at a lower speed.
...or that the ribs do not match the rib pattern for that glider. Either possibility would be grounds for cancelling the mountain flight.
What was grounds for canceling that flight was failure to execute anything resembling a hook-in check and if you're not addressing that issue above anything and everything else you're just wasting bandwidth.
Mid-air is no place for guesswork and unfounded optimism.
Bullshit.
- It's a certified glider.
- It didn't kill the previous owner on the previous flight at the same trim setting.
- The glider was supposed to have been preflighted before Jesse left the slope.
- He didn't have any problems really worth mentioning.
- Statistically what you're talking about is a total nonissue.
You were experienced enough to realize the problem (bad trim speed), and deal with it, but a more serious version of such a problem may have gone very differently.
Here's what he says, red:
Maybe it actually is trimmed too slow...
MAYBE it actually is trimmed too slow. Big fuckin' deal.
Launching from a slot is about the most challenging launch that I know...
Yep. No question whatsoever. I got the worst injury - launch or landing - of my hang gliding career just off the left edge of that slot.
...short of cliff launching.
Short of NOTHING. As long as you and your crew know how to handle a cliff launch there's little you can do from foot that's much safer or easier.
The choice of this launch site was NOT a good, conservative choice.
Fuck that. It's a Hang Two with sponsor site, he's a Hang Three, and - aside from his omission of the hook-in check - there's nothing at all wrong with his launch. And much better that he omit the hook-in check at Woodstock than at Daniels, McConnellsburg, or High Rock.
Fortunately, the winds were light...
How very odd. I'm having a hard time remembering showing up at Woodstock in light sled conditions and feeling fortunate.
...and you did not need to command a serious turn or heavy correction right after launch.
And what if he had? What indication has he given you that he wouldn't have been able to handle it? He's a goddam Hang Three and a goddam Hang Three is supposed to be able to handle moderate soaring conditions and 25 mile per hour winds. And 25 mile per hour winds are about as much as you want at Woodstock anyway. At 25 and over, flying at Woodstock tends to degenerate into an exercise in parking two thousand feet over the ridge.
Please re-read the first sentence, here. In any winds, you would have been faced with a challenging launch on an unfamiliar glider.
Bullshit. If the air is straight in any dork can get out of that slot no problem. And if it's cross and rolling into the slot it can get real exciting for the spectators no matter who's flying what.
This situation could have ended very badly, and no matter how badly it ended, the deadly mistake was made before you clipped in. A very poor decision was made there. All after that would be useless details.
Stuff it. THE deadly mistake that was made here was that he and everybody else on launch ASSUMED that he WAS clipped in at 0:08. The same deadly mistake that Bill Priday and everyone within sight of the Whitwell launch made on 2005/10/01 (seven years ago tomorrow). And I hold the guy under Jesse's right wing highly culpable for that one.
IF you had some expert pilot (who weighs exactly the same as you do) test-fly the glider, and pronounce it straight and trim, then maybe your choice was marginally acceptable, but only in the little or no winds that you had then.
- Define an "expert pilot".

- How much of an "expert pilot" does one hafta be to determine that a glider's flying straight and trim? Tell me why a good Hang One can't do this just as well as a Hang Five.

- Jesse's...
The glider tracks straight...
...plenty enough of an expert to pronounce it straight and...
Maybe it actually is trimmed too slow...
...he's OK on the trim.

- You're totally full of shit on this one. Shut up.
A bit of a breeze would still have scrubbed the flight, if you had asked me.
- A bit of a breeze would've made that launch one helluva lot easier and safer.

- I did a no-winder out of there one time and had every weed top almost to the bottom of the slot ringing my basetube. I was ready to eat tree but at near the end developed the speed I needed to get out of there. But that was the last time I even thought about a no-winder at Woodstock.

- Nobody asked you.
I realize, there are always the considerations of what sites are available, time and travel distances, convenience, etc. None of these details would mean much, though, had you come awake in a hospital bed.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22176
Paragliding Collapses
Jim Rooney - 2011/06/12 13:57:58 UTC

Most common HG injury... spiral fracture of the humerus.
Having his hands on the downtubes when his glider stopped was the thing that came appreciably close to putting him in a hospital bed. So why don't you talk about that?
This is serious stuff, my friend.
This guy is not your friend, Jesse. He's totally fuckin' clueless on threat prioritization.
Mistakes can cost far more than the repair bills for the glider and your body.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27141
an early end to my flying season

14-00725
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3859/14423696873_f1326e2320_o.png
Image

When you thought Allen had torn his rotator cuff I didn't hear you making any suggestions on the best ways not to tear his rotator cuff - just on how best to get it fixed. Is that 'cause he's a Four and has been flying since the mid Seventies?
This is the largest mistake I ever hope to see you make. Please do not repeat it.
You wouldn't know what a REAL mistake was if it bit you in the ass. If you had that ability you'd have talked to Don Arsenault and told him not to trust Mike Robertson an inch's worth.
If you would take a bit of advice here, it would be great if you can hold off selling the Falcon for a while, and be a guy with two gliders. You will soon face conditions or sites that would be no challenge for your friendly Falcon, but an unknown level of risk on a glider that you have little airtime with.
- Name one.

- Can ya maybe think of any circumstances it which his friendly Falcon might be a whole lot more dangerous to fly than a double surface Sport 2 with a VG cord?

On 2007/04/29 USHGA Accident Review Committee Chairman Joe Gregor took his wife's Falcon 195 to Woodstock 'cause he was keeping his Talon at Ridgely. He launched in ten but after about twenty minutes found himself going backwards and had to lock his arms to creep back out.

At his creep rate his only option was the primary and a really nasty thermal arrived at it at the same time he did.

He ended up with two broken arms he wouldn't have had had he been on the fuckin' Sport 2.
I believe you would be very happy then to fly the Falcon...
He's very happy...
Turns are fun! It's awesome how the glider just hangs in the banked turn without much effort.
Boy it has a lot more glide!
...flying the Sport 2 right now.
...and hold the new glider in reserve for the friendliest of sites, and the best of conditions.
Leave him the hell alone while he gets wired into it. And after five or ten minutes on a fair northwest day at Woodstock he'll be wired into it.
When you have good experience on the new glider, then it will (or may) be time to sell the Falcon. For myself, I recently bought a Falcon 3, for those days (or sites) when my double-surfaced glider gives no worthwhile advantages.
If he gets fucked up it won't be because he was flying the Sport versus the Falcon. It'll be because he:
- lost control of his glider moving his hands to and/or had his hands on the downtubes for a stupid standup landing
- blew the flare timing for a stupid standup landing
- had a standard aerotow weak link increase the safety of the towing operation at Ridgely or Manquin
If you need to make changes in the ribs to make them match the rib pattern, please do not test-fly the glider on any hill where you will be higher than you would care to fall.
Bullshit.
- His glider's flying straight. If they're symmetrical and he matches them to the pattern his glider will still be flying straight.
- Nobody's ever crashed a glider due to a batten adjustment.
Once the glider is set to specs, and you have good confidence in the results, then go to the higher sites.
He's already been to as high a site as any in the area and didn't do much worse than most of the local bozos - and a lot better than some.
Best wishes.
Leave it at the best wishes. Can the advice.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=20991
coated vs uncoated wires
Red Howard - 2011/02/22 06:50:21 UTC

I do not recommend "stepping" on a cable (I assume you mean in mid-span) as part of a preflight. If your foot hits the ground with the cable underneath, or sand or rocks are trapped in your shoe treads, you could damage the cable that you are testing.
And don't even think about telling him to ignore the most important element of the preflight inspection specified in his owner's manual.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

P.S.
- Nobody's ever crashed a glider due to a batten adjustment.
But I can name you one guy who had to have his lower legs amputated because he was way too focused on his batten adjustment and insufficiently focused on his connection status.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27243
First flight on Sport 2
Ryan Voight - 2012/09/29 01:47:10 UTC

Red makes good points regarding cautious decision making.
Bullshit. He's wasting bandwidth talking about trivial crap and totally ignoring the critical stuff.
On the safety-to-danger scale, with a 1 being what Red or I often advise people to do...
Yeah, I've noticed the similarities.
...and a 10 being what NMERider does regularly...
Gimme Jonathan any day of the week.
I'd still put you at a 3 or 4 here... so, pretty safe overall.
Yeah Ryan. I was quite positive you'd be totally cool with his total omission of the hook-in check.
There is ALWAYS risk involved in hang gliding...
Yeah, you and your dad have done quite a bit to make sure of that.
...it's just important that you're consciously managing those risks.
Fuck you, Ryan.
If you thought of the things Red listed, and felt comfortable accepting it, then I see no issue.
Funny. My reaction would be the precise opposite.
If you didn't think of some of those things, though... that's the real danger.
To the social positions of people like Red and you.
On a happier note- congrats on the new wing!
Yeah, isn't it great that he bought a new Wills Wing glider!
You had a great launch...
Because you're assumption that you were hooked in proved to be correct - this time.

That's not necessarily a good thing for you in the long run, Jesse. You coulda probably aborted and gotten away with some bruising and the hassle of recovering a glider with some minor damage. Then the Good Guys would've had a shot at getting through to you about hook-in checks.

And note that your instructor, who didn't bother, is up and will undoubtedly be rubber stamped for the 2012 Instructor of the Year Award. That's a pretty bad omen when you consider what happened in 2005 to the Hang Three student of the 2004 Instructor of the Year Award recipient from 105 miles behind the Woodstock launch.
...and were just a tad late on the flare when landing.
- And:
-- thirty seconds early on the transition.
-- let's say nothing about the:
--- shit approach.
--- advisability of doing standup landings in negligible wind and very wheel friendly pastures.
It looked to me like the right wing was starting to stall, and that's why it was dropping. Fairly normal for a crosswind landing, for the downwind wing to drop.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2Gd2kcyOes

1-2717
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7094/13952342741_f71f343877_o.png
Image
Image
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7151/13952329131_03e535bc8b_o.png
6-4518
- "Oh, that's so much more brainless than landing on your feet!"
- "That was beautiful!"
- "That was a GREAT landing, Rotor!"
- "Who cares if it's downwind!"
- "Ooh shit, that was awesome!"
Remember to FEEL the flare timing and don't get fooled by ground speed.
Fuck the flare timing and don't worry about the groundspeed.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26379
Landings
Jim Rooney - 2012/01/21 04:49:59 UTC

It's fun as hell. Up hill, down hill, into wind, with the wind, cross wind... who cares? You're on wheels. Over and over and over.
Flare is going to be at a slightly faster ground speed on the S2 than it was on your Falcon... but it should FEEL the same (assuming the glider is trimmed correctly- which it might not be?)
But you're not gonna tell that to anybody, are ya Ryan? 'Cause you're in the businesses of selling downtubes and...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27217
Bad Launch!
NMERider - 2012/09/25 07:01:39 UTC
Why would CSS want that when his last landing clinic resulted in a broken arm to one of his students? Image
...conning people into believing that if they just take your clinics enough times they'll be able to really nail this foot landing thing.
Back to safety- I keep telling people how dangerous it is to test fly Sport 2's... 'cause then you'll have to have one! Image
Spoken like a true Wills Wing dealer.
Keep the videos coming, you're doing great!
And keep working on that flare timing. You'll have it down in no time.
Jesse Yoder - 2012/09/29 02:14:22 UTC
If you thought of the things Red listed...
I did. I was also with an experienced pilot (who had flown the glider) who also judged conditions to be acceptable.
He also judged your skipping of the hook-in check acceptable. Same way he did Bill Priday's skipping of the hook-in check - precisely two weeks before he skipped one too many.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27243
First flight on Sport 2
Red Howard - 2012/09/29 02:57:41 UTC

Jesse,

Agreed, the conditions were acceptable.
ACCEPTABLE?!? Overcast and trickling in enough for a three minute sled ride? What more could one ask for?
I said that. Some of the rest was maybe, maybe not. As long as you can say here, "I got away with it," then okay, we all grow. If you think you will make better decisions from this event, that's even better. If you think I'm just wasting words, then enough said, and best wishes.
Every asshole aerotowing with Industry Standard equipment, and that means virtually EVERYONE aerotowing...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3107
I have a tandem rating!!!
Lauren Tjaden - 2008/03/23 22:20:15 UTC

When Jim got me locked out to the right, I couldn't keep the pitch of the glider with one hand for more than a second (the pressure was a zillion pounds, more or less), but the F'ing release slid around when I tried to hit it. The barrel release wouldn't work because we had too much pressure on it.

Anyhow, the tandem can indeed perform big wingovers, as I demonstrated when I finally got separated from the tug.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26870
weak links
Steve Seibel - 2012/08/18 16:22:36 UTC

The high G-load made it harder to for me to get my hand quickly to the release, and the glider rolled to quite a steep bank, and the loads rose much higher than I intended before I hit the handle.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/skysailingtowing/message/6726
Weaklinks
Peter Birren - 2008/10/27 23:41:49 UTC

So you pull whatever release you have but the one hand still on the basetube isn't enough to hold the nose down and you pop up and over into an unplanned semi-loop. Been there, done that... at maybe 200 feet agl.
Ralph Sickinger - 2000/08/26 22:18:20

Under sled conditions, I decided to borrow Brian Vant-Hull's glider instead of setting up my own, since we both fly the same type of glider. Brian's release is a different style, but I tested it twice during preflight to make sure I was familiar with it. After towing to altitude, Sunny waved me off; I pulled on the release (hard), but nothing happened! After the second failed attempt to release, I thought about releasing from the secondary, but before I could move my hand the tug stalled and started to fall; Sunny had no choice but to gun the engine in attempt to regain flying speed, but this resulted in a sudden and severe pull on the harness and glider; I was only able to pull on the release again, while simultaneously praying for the weak link to break. The release finally opened, and I was free of the tug.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22540
LMFP release dysfunction
Antoine Saraf - 2011/07/14 08:33:59 UTC

We have been having considerable trouble releasing when the line is under high tension. It takes considerable effort to pull the Rope-Loop release, often requiring two or three violent tugs on the loop. Obviously, this is a considerable safety concern.
Lockout Mountain Flight Park - 2009/07/12

There is no product liability insurance covering this gear and we do not warrant this gear as suitable for towing anything.
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3391
More on Zapata and weak link
Paul Tjaden - 2008/07/22 04:32:22 UTC

I have never had a lockout situation happen so quickly and dramatically and had no chance to release as I have always thought I could do.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21033
barrels release without any tension except weight of rope..
Bart Weghorst - 2011/02/25 19:06:26 UTC

But I've had it once where the pin had bent inside the barrel from excessive tow force. My weaklink was still intact. The tug pilot's weaklink broke so I had the rope. I had to use two hands to get the pin out of the barrel.
No stress because I was high.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14230
pro tow set-up
Jim Rooney - 2009/11/02 18:58:13 UTC

Oh yeah... an other fun fact for ya... ya know when it's far more likely to happen? During a lockout. When we're doing lockout training, the odds go from 1 in 1,000 to over 50/50.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=865
Tandem pilot and passenger death
Mike Van Kuiken - 2005/10/13 19:47:26 UTC

The weak link broke from the tow plane side. The towline was found underneath the wreck, and attached to the glider by the weaklink. The glider basically fell on the towline.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Davis Straub - 2011/08/26 14:04:52 UTC

We had six weaklink breaks in a row at Zapata this year.
...is rolling dice EVERY SINGLE TIME HE GOES UP. And THIS is where you focus your catastrophe mitigating energies?

Yeah, you're totally wasting words - and distracting everybody from REAL issues.

But... what the hell...

- You've only made the Ignore List of one Jack Show community member and you've never been in any danger of getting sent to The Basement or locked down - let alone banned.

- EVERY SINGLE ONE of the sixty:
-- of your posts that's been rated has been THREE THUMBS UP!!!
-- posts that you've rated has been THREE THUMBS UP!

Really hard to go wrong in this sport with fluff. Keep up the good work.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27243
First flight on Sport 2
Felix Cantesanu - 2012/09/29 04:16:09 UTC
Baltimore

Congrats on your new wing!

You are on the light side for the glider so moving a hole up will probably help the trim problem (definitely should not be porpoising with the bar at trim).
WHAT TRIM PROBLEM??? He says:
Maybe it actually is trimmed too slow, as it did seem to porpoise a bit when I let it go to trim.
MAYBE it actually is trimmed too slow, as it did SEEM to porpoise a bit when he let it go to trim.
It ISN'T trimmed too slow and it DIDN'T porpoise when he lets go at 1:23. When he lets go at 1:23 NOTHING HAPPENS.
I hook in around 220 on my Sport 2 155 and the middle hole is right for me.
If the middle hole is right for you at 220 then the middle hole is also gonna be right for you if you lose seventy pounds - idiot.
You can always carry more gear with you for some extra weight :-)
It won't make any difference. The settings are available for your preference in relation to where your glider trims with respect to stall, min sink, best glide speeds. That doesn't change.

How do you assholes manage to get ratings? Oh, right. You're getting them from other assholes. Never mind.
I actually found landing the Sport 2 easier than the Falcon (call me crazy); control inputs do have to be more precise but you get used to that fast. The training hill is the best place to find the VG settings for launching and landing - a bit of VG on seems to always help.
And let's be sure not to talk about the wheels seeming to always help.
I wish you great times with your new glider, it's given me many fun hours and I'm looking forward to more.
He'll hafta get permission from Red before he's allowed to have any fun on it.

Hey Ryan... I notice you're not debunking this trim setting bullshit - same way I noticed you just walked out of the conversation when...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27217
Bad Launch!
Doug Doerfler - 2012/09/27 07:26:01 UTC

In this case Ryan has no idea what he is talking about.
...Doug called you on that crap you wrote about being able to weight shift a glider without touching the control frame.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3568
Saturday's epic flying had a not so epic moment
NMERider - 2012/09/28 23:24:20 UTC

I heard Phill on the radio urging the Falcon pilot with the black leading edge to get out from behind the ridge. We could have easily had multiple Falcons go down behind Kagel in what I saw as a sad case of "Monkey See--Monkey Do". It could have been a real mess to get everyone safely out of there and a black eye to the club, had there been a mass flush cycle.

I witnessed and shot video of multiple Falcons flying where they did not belong and where it wasn't even necessary to be as there was plenty of lift out front. Later, I have Linden recorded on radio saying how he was nine thousand feet above Kagel.

On these days where the lift is big, the sink is even bigger. This is why the 45 degree rule must be adhered to even if the wind is dead calm. I was hitting steady sink up to 1400 fpm during my extended flight which is enough to reduce the effective glide of a Falcon down to 1.5:1 or a 30 degree angle. My glide angle on full race gear was a low as 4:1 with no headwind.

I hope that all Falcon pilots take these words seriously.
A Falcon isn't an automatic safety margin stretcher for Jesse or anyone else when you throw a bit of wind into the equation. Joe Gregor will definitely back me up on that one.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3568
Saturday's epic flying had a not so epic moment
NMERider - 2012/09/28 23:24:20 UTC

This has been a very bad year for needless injury and death. I know a lot of pilots around the country and elsewhere and there has been far more than you will ever see in print or read about.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=20756
How is Zach Etheridge doing?
Bob Flynn - 2011/02/04 11:26:34 UTC

Lookout keeps this kind of stuff under their hat. You never hear of accidents there. But every time I go there, I hear about quite a few. Blown launches, tree landings, etc.
One hundred percent of it was easily avoidable, including my own fractured ankle from September 19th (in Yucaipa), which is why I did not attend the Dahlston Cup.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27262
Accident Reports
Jatay - 2012/10/01 22:45:34 UTC
California

Is this the best available?
http://www.ushpa.aero/safety.asp
Last updated 2007 ! ???... Seems like there would be a wealth of information available from an accident archive.
Why the black hole?
- No, that's about the worst available. The best available is over here at Kite Strings. I get the information off the web while the wreckage is still smoldering - when witnesses blurt out what happened and before posts get edited or deleted, photos and videos get taken down, and people get their stories straight and start sticking to them.

- This is a black hole that's been sucking in everything that gets near it and constantly growing and becoming more powerful almost dating back...
Robert V. Wills - 1976/10

1976 FATALITIES: A FIRST LOOK

Because there was some feeling that people involved in hang gliding, and people observing the sport from outside, should become preoccupied with accidents and fatalities, the editor of Ground Skimmer asked me to refrain from submitting accident summaries on an every-issue basis.
...to the days of bamboo. And there is NOTHING that's EVER gonna reverse or even stop that process - EXCEPT, maybe, hopefully...
Steven Leiler - 2012/10/01 23:23:15 UTC
Durham, Connecticut

Lawyers and law suits.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25321
Stop the Stupids at the USHPA BOD meeting
Mark G. Forbes - 2011/09/29 02:26:23 UTC

We can establish rules which we think will improve pilot safety, but our attorney is right. USHPA is not in the business of keeping pilots "safe" and it can't be. Stepping into that morass is a recipe for extinction of our association. I wish it were not so, but it is. We don't sell equipment, we don't offer instruction, and we don't assure pilots that they'll be safe. Even so, we get sued periodically by people who say we "shoulda, coulda, woulda" done something that would have averted their accident.

It's not just concern for meet directors and policy makers...it's about our continued existence as an association. It's about minimizing the chance of our getting sued out of existence. We're one lawsuit away from that, all the time, and we think hard about it.
...USHGA getting its evil, rotten, corrupt ass sued out of existence. But I doubt that'll ever happen - too many people have been and can be bought off.
Fred Wilson - 2012/10/01 23:31:30 UTC
Vernon, British Columbia

It's on the USHPA Fall Meeting Agenda.
Yeah. Like my Aerotow SOPs and Guideline were supposed to have been on the 2009 USHPA Spring Meeting Agenda.
If you have input, contact your Regional Director.
Good freaking luck.
I used to publish them here in Canada. The general public saw it, and a ski resort (who like all does NOT publish anything in the way of accident reports) pulled our access to one of our most valuable sites.
Lesson learned... Always think about the ramifications of doing the right thing. If you think that somebody died in large part because of a failure or shortcoming of the instructional and regulatory systems then paint the guy as an irresponsible, incompetent, uneducable accident who was waiting to happen despite everyone's best efforts.
It took years and hard, hard work on the part of my successors to regain access.
Maybe you'd have been better off getting a tug and giving people a shot at the fucking ski resort that way. That's how sailplanes operate.
So I sympathize with both sides of the issue.
Meaning what? It's OK to water down and distort a fatality report, pull punches, and increase the probability of destroying the lives of another flyer and his family 'cause that might cost you some future playtime?

Sacrificing integrity might buy you something in the short term but in the long run you're gonna wind up with a lot of closets stuffed with skeletons and a safety record you won't be able to point to when you're negotiating maintaining or acquiring access and privileges. And right now dude... Your national organization sucks every bit as much as the one of your neighbor to the south.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27262
Accident Reports
Jaime Perry - 2012/10/01 23:34:53 UTC
Trenton, Georgia

I think this is a great topic.
Yeah, it always is. And on the Jack, Davis, and Bob Shows the motherfuckers with the fingers on the buttons always make sure they go nowhere.

But if you wanna see some similar ones just scroll through The Basement. I've got a few threads down there where assholes like you asked Jack to send them.
I see it as the biggest problem for our sport.
No shit.
We have a terrible lessons learned record...
Fuck you, Jamie.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14230
pro tow set-up
Jack Axaopoulos - 2009/11/09 14:44:23 UTC

AT, your continual bashing in general and bashing of HG schools has gotten really old. AT parks have solid safety records, so what you say and reality seem to be quite far apart.

You dominate the ignore report here http://www.hanggliding.org/ignorereport.php
Ever ask yourself why???

You do nothing but bring negativity here. My finger is on the ban button.
This is your last warning.

If you continue rubbing everyone the wrong way with your harsh, know it all tone, you are out of here.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14312
Tow Park accidents
Jaime Perry - 2009/11/10 10:56:19 UTC

I can't say that I'm sorry to see him go.

BUT...

I really wish the sport had a die hard advocate for safety improvements because I think we have a lot of room to improve the sport. Sometimes Tad makes some good points, he just goes about things in the most ineffective and offensive way. Imagine someone as passionate as Tad that was a great communicator who could influence people and make things happen...

Honestly now that he is banned I'd like to see some rational discussion about some of his safety concerns without his obnoxiousness making me leave the threads.

I've only been a pilot since September 07 and there have been numerous serious accidents at my local flying site. I don't feel like we do a good job of compiling the information on the incidents to make use in an effective lessons learned program. I wonder a lot lately "What can I do to make a difference?"

HG.org really has the ability to make a big difference in this sport, I'd like to challenge all of us to figure out how to use this wonderful place (that SG has so generously provided) as a powerful advocate for safety in this sport.

SG I know your reluctant to ban anyone but I support you on this one. It had gotten to the point that I avoided mentioning safety at all so as not to lure Tad into any thread of discussion.

Thanks for all that you do again!
YOU have a terrible lessons learned record 'cause you're too:

- fuckin' stupid to appreciate the importance and value of First Amendment principles;

- much of a whiny little punk to be able to listen to a message that might keep your fuckin' neck from getting broken unless you're simultaneously being told what a wonderful person you are.

I've said that the flight schools and AT parks - particularly the one half a mile from your driveway - are run by serial killers.

Jack says they're all wonderful and he won't permit any of his cult members to hear me if I say different.

You said then and are saying now that this sport's safety record is a fuckin' disaster - just like I've always said.

Now ask yourself why - if HG.org really has the ability to make a big difference in this sport and you've challenged everybody to figure out how to use that wonderful place (that Jack has so generously provided) as a powerful advocate for safety in this sport - that absolutely nothing has happened in the nearly three years since you made that challenge, a bunch more people have been needlessly mangled and killed, and you're still saying that this sport's safety record is a fuckin' disaster.
I wonder a lot lately "What can I do to make a difference?"
For starters you can stop doing NOTHING - like you have been since you entered the sport, use both hands, push real hard, and extract your nose from Jack's anus.

Then you can start reading crash reports, learning some high school physics, applying some ten year old kid common sense, figuring out what's going on, and making some enemies.

But you won't. You're gonna leave your nose in Jack's ass, periodically whine about the sport's perpetually rotten safety record, and make calls for your Prince Charming to show up and fix things for you. So go fuck yourself.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27262
Accident Reports
Love2Glide - 2012/10/02 00:02:17 UTC
Huntsville, Alabama

Here is an accident summary for Andy Jackson Air Park. It's the only site specific accident data I know of. Maybe there are pages like it for other clubs?

http://flytandem.com/accident/index.htm
Thanks. I think I'll be able to have a bit of fun with that.
Ryan Voight - 2012/10/02 01:05:51 UTC
Steven Leiler - 2012/10/01 23:23:15 UTC

Lawyers and law suits.
That's not incorrect, but not the primary reason(s).

There is an utter lack of reporting. Not really worth the effort of compiling an annual summary when only a dozen (if that) accidents get reported each year.
How the fuck would you know...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25321
Stop the Stupids at the USHPA BOD meeting
Mark G. Forbes - 2011/09/30 23:21:56 UTC

Here's how it really works:

- Member submits an accident report. Could be the pilot who had the accident, or some other witness.

- Accident report is sent to Tim to maintain legal privilege. Tim reviews the report and determines whether there's significant legal risk associated with it. He may redact certain parts (personally identifiable information, etc.) if in his opinion exposure of that information poses a risk to us. If the report is very risky, he may decide that it can't be shared further, and will notify the Executive Director about it.
...how many accidents get reported each year?

There's only one person who knows that for sure and it's the ABSOLUTE LAST person a pilot would want in control of that information.
Jatay - 2012/10/02 02:50:59 UTC

Is there any kind of requirement for local administrators of USHPA sanctioned flying sites to report accidents?

Maybe folks don't want this kind of reporting in place; seems to me the sport is destined for known, repetitive mistakes without some form of required, formalized reporting that would generate an indicator as to which skills are in need of additional emphasis.
- DESTINED? What do you think has been going on for the past three or four decades?

- It wouldn't make any difference anyway.

Robert Wills was a good and dedicated Accident Review Chairman but let's throw him out 'cause the sport was a primitive bloodbath during most of his reign.

Doug Hildreth came along at around the beginning of modern hang gliding and did an excellent job of accumulating, compiling, analyzing, and reporting on crash data. He made no difference 'cause the national organization, officials, dealers, schools, tow operations, instructors, and clubs kept on doing whatever the fuck they felt like with no concern about enforcement or accountability whatsoever.

Positive change will NEVER come down from the top in this game.
I started this thread after watching a (relatively recent) HG accident on YouTube, then trying to find out what happened (in a factual manner). Nada... nothing available.
Which one? I'll bet I can crack it - assuming I haven't already.
Post Reply