Mitch's landing clinic
Paraglider Collapse - 2013/04/11 07:17:23 UTC
Body vertical, hands high, hard flare - perfect form!
In keeping with your opposite approaches to everything in conventional aviation, math, logic, common sense...Jim Rooney - 2013/04/13 11:26:56 UTC
Strange.
I have kinda the opposite approach to others out there when I teach landings.
Hard to wrong with "worse" when it's anything you're involved in.Better? Worse? I have no idea.
Like I said.I have nothing but respect for what Ryan, Paul and Mitch are doing out there.
That's OK, I'll handle this one. Fuck all three of them - in addition to you and anyone in this sport who tolerates you.This is by no means a critique of their styles.
No shit.While I agree that a good landing does indeed start with a good approach, I don't start there for a landing clinic.
The most useless and dangerous thing - per usual.I like to focus on one thing at a time and then build on each thing.
People get killed because they're focusing on those last "critical" moments of a landing instead of the approach. Tony Ameo (2009/11/15 - Wallaby) is fuckin' textbook.So, if I were to focus on a landing approach, then I wouldn't be focusing on those last critical moments of a landing.
Compare/Contrast contrast with Steve Pearson:In the grand scheme of things, I find that you can't really "focus" on the landing approach if you're (at best) "concerned" about the actual touch down.
He stays geared for the approach all the way in and doesn't give much of a rat's ass about those last critical moments of the landing.Steve Pearson - 2012/03/28 23:26:05 UTC
I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.
Good. You should spend a lot more time with scooter and a lot less with aero.Instead, I back things up.
(the scooter tow system allows me to teach this way)
Yawn.I like to start fully on the ground... no scooter... just you and the glider.
I work backwards through the landing. I start with the last moments. I start with the flare. Fully on the ground.
Then back to just 5ft off the ground.
Then 10 (the roundout)
Then 20 (the "dive into ground effect)
ETC
Shouldn't you be teaching them in a narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place so they'll be in the only environment in which what you're teaching them could possibly matter?It's a long time before I allow anyone to bother with their landing approach.
Learn to touch the earth softly first.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=25536My clinics can be annoying as they are the not "quick fixes" that people desire.
It's a process and it's a slow one.
But at the end, you know how to land and how to land well.
Whoops! Snapped another tip wand :-O
NMERider - 2012/03/14 15:17:14 UTC
His one-technique-fits-all attitude espoused on the Oz Report Forum has become tiresome to read. It does not work in the fucked-up world of XC landings and weary pilots.
I like what Steve Pearson does when he comes in and may adapt something like that.
Or tow equipment that works. Or weak links up in the legal range.For example... I don't let people use their gliders.
The good news is that the only people who have to deal with you in that capacity are the ones stupid enough to elect to.You start on a falcon. PERIOD.
If you can't land a falcon properly, why the hell are you going to try learning to fix your landings on a topless?
Call me silly.
But I prefer it that way.
Great to see that you're as on board with his landing philosophy as you are with him on towing.Brad Gryder - 2013/04/13 12:45:49 UTC
Jim,
Good points you made...
How 'bout we just eliminate the quaint little landing practice of ours......but we probably should make efforts to accelerate everything hanggliding to flatten the learning curve and attract more potential pilots.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22176
Paragliding Collapses
...that knocks more people out of the sport - temporarily and permanently, oftentimes before they even start - than anything else?Jim Rooney - 2011/06/12 13:57:58 UTC
Most common HG injury... spiral fracture of the humerus.
I'm a HUGE fan of dumbing things down in hang gliding...Everything else is being 'dumbed down', so why not hang gliding?
- unhooked launch prevention procedures
- landing approaches
- landings
- releases
- bridles
- weak link definitions
- failure modes
- emergency procedures
Or smallish wheels on good surfaces, or...Let's just let 'em land on big wheels...
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26854
Skids vs wheels
...skids.Andrew Stakhov - 2012/08/11 13:52:35 UTC
So I just came back from flying in Austria (awesome place btw). Stark difference I noticed is a large chunk of pilots choose to fly with skids instead of wheels. Conversations I had with pilots they say they actually work better in certain situations as they don't get plugged up like smaller wheels. Even larger heavier Atosses were all flying with skids. I was curious why they consistently chose to land on skids on those expensive machines and they were saying that it's just not worth the risk of a mistimed flare or wing hitting the ground... And those are all carbon frames etc.
And keep existing ones....forever if thats what it takes to make new pilots.
Why?Propose new hg skill on USHPA Card? FLAND = foot landing
- We have tons of people in the sport now who are incapable of and elect not to land on their feet - some of whom fly XC and undoubtedly have better safety records than XC foot landings.
- One of the sport's big killers is on the other end of the flight and occurs when foot launchers incorrectly assume they're connected to their gliders during the several seconds preceding launch. (Talk to your buddy Rooney about that one.) We've got a virtually totally effective regulation/procedure to deal with the problem that NOBODY teaches or enforces and only the tiniest percentage of flyers personally adhere to. What's the rationale behind refusing to make the launches safe while mandating dangerous landings?