instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36049
Tandem launch: Scared customer.
Jaco Herbst - 2014/02/01 03:10:11 UTC

edit

The link is now public.
It is NOT the video but only two images of pre-launch.

http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-IWj8M3AzUz4/Uutdk5XBBoI/AAAAAAAAFdM/yQPps_TbCM8/w1357-h817-no/IMG_8405.JPG
Image
http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-7ub7eF5lFw0/UutdnUOm1PI/AAAAAAAAFdU/i_ITdpiTX1A/w1358-h796-no/IMG_8406.JPG
Image

I'm still waiting for the customer (that is if he decides to do that) to upload the video.
The launch went uneventful. Sorry, not my intention to shout "wolf".
Just thinking there is a lesson(s) to be learned here.
C'mon, Jim. Fire up that keen intellect of yours and tell us all about...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21313
Lockout
Jim Rooney - 2011/03/24 20:48:15 UTC

Wow, there's just so much wrong here... I won't even bother.
Image
...just how much is wrong here. But when you do make sure to bear in mind that that one ended up with two fewer people going to the hospital than was the case with your final foot launched tandem flight.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30713
Does USHPA penalize instructors and deter growth?
Rodger Hoyt - 2014/01/30 20:24:09 UTC

I know that in the 1990's USHGA made it virtually impossible to become an instructor, mainly by never having any certification clinics. Paul Voight wrote an article in HG magazine titled "How To Become a Certified Instructor Dude." In it he said that certification clinics were "frequently found in the HG magazine calendar of events." I went back through my HG issues and found NO ICP's at all in the entire US for the previous year. The USHGA had put the ICP program into the hands of the big commercial schools (LMFP, etc.) who had a vested interest in excluding the competition of local instructors.

I wanted to become an instructor then but finally gave up in frustration. It is not a coincidence that it was about then that hang gliding began its participant decline.
- Would it be too much trouble for you to tell us WHAT year? I just spent half the morning going through the DVD archives for that decade and a bit off of the ends and couldn't find it.

- I recall some stupid article I believe was titled "How To Become a Certified Tandem Dude" probably by G.W. Meadows. Didn't find that one either.

- Yeah, no doubt whatsoever. The ongoing history/evolution of hang gliding has been ever increasing control by the cartels.

In 1984 I got a job for which I was supposed to teach hang gliding at Jockey's Ridge State Park. I was a certified instructor and sent the paperwork in to North Carolina in plenty of time to do the summer season and never got anything back. No fuckin' way Kitty Hawk Kites was gonna let anybody intrude on their private dunes. They also treated Currituck County Airport as their private facility. And same deal with Highland Aerosports at Ridgely Airpark.

At the beginning of June of 1996 I put myself in the clutches of Mike Robertson and Greg Black at Ellenville for a combined ICP / step tow clinic. I swear the former of those two motherfuckers deliberately crashed me twice - the first by dumping me into a stall while I was mushing along at four feet waiting for him to pull me up and the second by gassing it and accelerating me into a lockout and the ground when I came off the cart a little rolled in a strong crosswind.

Then the bullshit with the radio, me pulling the line off the winch, and the lies they spread and had Dennis publish on Page 67 of the excellent book, Towing Aloft, by Dennis Pagen and Bill Bryden.

http://www.kitestrings.org/post308.html#p308
Towing Aloft

Then flunking me as an instructor, despite the facts that:
- Mike had previously signed me off in 1982
- Dennis had previously signed me off in 1989
- I kicked everybody else's asses on the material and tests
- I had previously worked as an instructor at Kitty Hawk for one and a third seasons
- Mike has no problem whatsoever signing off a total dildo like Marc Fink

What the fuck, they already had my money.
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

The towline release is a critically important piece of equipment. It is the device which frees you from the towline and it must be failure-proof. Numerous designs have evolved over the years--some very good and some not so good. Unfortunately, releases are items that many pilots feel they can make at home or adapt from something they have seen at the hardware store. Two fatalities have occurred in the past 5 years directly related to failures of very poorly constructed and maintained releases. For the sake of safety, only use releases that have been designed and extensively tested by reputable manufacturers. Listed below are various types of releases available with their attributes and applications.

Provided in Appendix III is a performance test specification for towline releases. This is not presented to give you guidelines for making your own, but rather to make you aware of the requirements of a good release in order to select and purchase good equipment (See Appendix IV).
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22308
Better mouse trap(release)?
Jim Rooney - 2010/12/16 18:47:05 UTC

A few years ago, I started refusing to tow people with home made gear.
I like the idea of improving gear, but the lack of appreciation for the world they were stepping into didn't sit with me.
For example... flying with the new gear in mid day conditions?
Are you kidding me????

Approach it for what it is... completely untested and very experimental gear which will likely fail in new and unforseen ways as it tries it's damndest to kill you... and then we can talk.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TUGS/message/1184
aerotow instruction was Re: Tug Rates
Larry Jorgensen - 2011/02/17 13:37:47 UTC
Air Adventures NW
Spanaway, Washington

It did not come from the FAA, it came from a USHPA Towing Committee made up of three large aerotow operations that do tandems for hire.

Appalling.
Dr. Trisa Tilletti - 2012/06

What we have covered in this article is practical information and knowledge gleaned from the real world of aerotowing, developed over decades and hundreds of thousands of tows by experts in the field. This information has practical external validity. Hopefully, someone will develop methods and technology that work better than what we are using as standard practice today. Like the methods and technology used today, it is unlikely that the new technology will be dictated onto us as a de jure standard. Rather, to become a de facto standard, that new technology will need to be made available in the marketplace, proven in the real world, and then embraced by our sport.
Dr. Trisa Tilletti - 2012/06

This article was peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the USHPA Towing Committee.
Just a few big commercial operations determining that:
- Hook-in checks will not be taught.
- Foot:
-- landings will be prioritized above all else
-- launches will be used for tow and only training program graduates will be allowed to dolly launch
- If weak links allow gliders to get airborne more than four out of five times they're too heavy.
- All barrel release pins will be bent.
- Any release that can be blown in an emergency is dangerous, homemade, experimental gear and will not be flown.
- Tad doesn't fly anywhere and anybody who advocates physics and logic based aviation is treading on real thin ice.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30722
What happened to JD?
Matt Christensen - 2014/02/01 05:43:27 UTC

Anyone know? Someone eluded to an incident, hope he is OK.
Yeah Matt, that's what people do the vast majority of the time when there's an incident in this sport.
Zack Marzec, a year ago this afternoon... You should've seen some of the elusion that was going on.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Paul Tjaden - 2013/02/07 23:47:58 UTC

Beyond these facts anything else would be pure speculation. I have personally had numerous weak link breaks on tow, both low and high, after hitting turbulence and have never felt in danger of a tumble. I have witnessed countless others have weak link breaks with no serious problems.

We train aero tow pilots how to handle this situation and I am certain that Zach had also encountered this situation many times before and knew how to react properly. Apparently, Zach simply hit strong low level turbulence, probably a dust devil that could not be seen due to the lack of dust in Florida, the nose went too high and he tumbled at a very low altitude.

I wish I could shed more light on this accident but I am afraid this is all we know and probably will know. Zach was a great guy with an incredible outlook and zest for life. He will be sorely missed.
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/09 18:30:26 UTC

Because it's one of those crusty old debates that HGs love to go round and round with.
It's like uttering the word "wheels"... the conversation instantly turns into the great wheel debate.
Davis Straub - 2013/02/13 15:45:22 UTC

IMHO aerotowing is relatively safe compared with foot launching. I would certainly like to make it safer. What we would all like to know is what could we do to make it safer.

We have no agreement that a stronger weaklink would make it safer (again, I fly with a slightly stronger weaklink).
Jim Gaar - 2013/02/13 17:57:05 UTC

Because it has the best known and accountable safety record (in my personal books anyway).
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/13 19:09:33 UTC

It was already worked out by the time I arrived.
The reason it sticks?
Trail and error.
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/16 23:18:54 UTC

Naw... You want me to make bold black and white statements so that you can have a go.
Unfortunately that's not what you're getting.
Some people listen with the intent of understanding.

Others do so with the intent of responding.
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/17 00:34:14 UTC

You need to understand something here that you're really not getting yet.
You are talking as if I or "we" need to justify something to you.
This is 180deg off.
YOU are the one arguing with a system that's been in place and has been worked on over quite literally HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of tows.

The onus is on YOU.
Not the other way around.
"We" don't need to justify jack.
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/22 09:25:21 UTC

If he only had better wheels.
William Olive - 2013/02/27 20:55:06 UTC

Like the rest of us, you have no idea what really happened on that tow.
We probably never will know.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/03 19:37:19 UTC

See, most people are happy with how we do things. This isn't an issue for them. They just come out and fly. Thing's aren't perfect, but that's life... and life ain't perfect. You do what you can with what you've got and you move on.

It saddens me to know that the rantings of the fanatic fringe mask the few people who are actually working on things. The fanaticism makes it extremely hard to have a conversation about these things as they always degrade into arguments. So I save the actual conversations for when I'm talking with people in person.

A fun saying that I picked up... Some people listen with the intent of understanding. Others with the intent of responding.
I like that.

For fun... if you're not seeing what I mean... try having a conversation here about wheels.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/07 18:24:58 UTC

You're the one advocating change here, not me.
I'm fine.

These are only questions if you're advocating change. Which I'm not. You are.

You're the one speculating on Zack's death... not me.
Hell, you've even already come to your conclusions... you've made up your mind and you "know" what happened and what to do about.
It's disgusting and you need to stop.
You weren't there. You don't know.
All you have is the tug pilot report, who himself says he doesn't know... and HE WAS THERE... and he doesn't know.

Ever heard of "Confirmation Bias"?
Because you're a textbook example.
You were out looking for data to support your preconceived conclusion, rather than looking at the data and seeing what it tells you... which is why this is the first time we've heard from you and your gang.

Go back to Tad's hole in the ground.
While you're there, ask him why he was banned from every east coast flying site.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/04 19:31:36 UTC

The accepted standards and practices changed.
I still won't tow people with doubled up weaklinks. You don't get to "make shit up". I don't "make shit up" for that matter either.

We all play by the same rules, or we don't play.
Morningside decided that they were happy with 200lb weaklink. They changed their tug's link and they don't just pass the stuff out either. If you'd like to know more about it... go ask them.
The law of the land at comps was 130lb greenspot or you don't tow. Seriously. It was announced before the comp that this would be the policy. Some guys went and made their case to the safety committee and were shut down. So yeah, sorry... suck it up.
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/05 05:15:25 UTC

Nonsense.
It's completely about convenience.
People like to argue about it and in their arguments, they dig up rationalizations of it not being about convenience, but sorry... it very much is about convenience.

Take if from the other angle... if it were about safety... if you are truly concerned about your safety... why are you towing? Why are the people that are arguing about weaklinks towing?
The answer of course is that it's not actually about "safety".
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/05 19:42:58 UTC

My god my head hurts.

Wow...
So you know what happened then?
OMG... thank you for your expert accident analysis. You better fly down to FL and let them know. I'm sure they'll be very thankful to have such a crack expert mind on the case analyzing an accident that you know nothing about. Far better data than the people that were actually there. In short... get fucked.

I'm tired of arguing with crazy.
As I said many times... there are those that listen with the intent of responding... you unfortunately are one.

You've done a great job of convincing me never to tow you.
Thank you for that.
Mission accomplished.
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/05 21:40:02 UTC

I'm sorry that you don't like that the tug pilot has the last word... but tough titties.
Don't like it?
Don't ask me to tow you.

Go troll somewhere else buddy.
I'm over this.
Davis Straub - 2013/03/06 18:29:05 UTC

You know, after all this discussion I'm now convinced that it is a very good idea to treat the weaklink as a release, that that is exactly what we do when we have a weaklink on one side of a pro tow bridle. That that is exactly what has happened to me in a number of situations and that the whole business about a weaklink only for the glider not breaking isn't really the case nor a good idea for hang gliding.

I'm happy to have a relatively weak weaklink, and have never had a serious problem with the Greenspot 130, just an inconvenience now and then.

I'm thinking about doing a bit more testing as there seemed to be some disagreement around here about what the average breaking strength of a loop of Greenspot (or orange) weaklink was.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36049
Tandem launch: Scared customer.
Jim Rooney - 2014/02/01 22:16:19 UTC

I would *love* to see that video!
Ya know what hang gliding video I would *love* to see?
The Press - 2006/03/15

In a video, he was seen to hold on to the glider for about fifty meters before hitting power lines.
Rooney and the passenger fell about fifteen meters to the ground.
Speaking of scared tandem customers? How come nobody in the hang gliding public has ever gotten to see that one?
Yup... first thought... "he's holding the footbar"?... you know he's going to drop that right?... he'll probably trip over it too... and grab something else.

Funny... you look more nervous in the first pic than he does... he looks like he's in his "happy place".
And how were things in your "happy place"...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=11288
*???tandems???*
Jim Rooney - 2009/03/29 20:32:51 UTC

Wow, didn't think I'd be taken as trying to hide anything...
No worries.... my info is all public knowledge.

Me... clip in failure 2006, Coronet Peak NZ. Extreme Air hang gliding.
(btw, everyone seems to miss the fact that it was _during_ my hang check). Yes, tandem. Passenger was fine, visited me in the hospital. Me? multiple injuries. Two and a half months in hospital.
...in the two and a half months following your last foot launch "tandem" "flight"?
So... let me guess..
GUESS? Isn't GUESSING a lot like...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/28 01:17:55 UTC

I'm a bit sick of all the armchair experts telling me how my friend died.
Ah but hg'ers get so uppity when you tell them not to speculate.
...SPECULATION?
you got a couple steps out of him (lucky you), he drops the footbar immediately and grabs the right downtube as he goes featal and swings into you taking out your right foot. I'm guessing you got real lucky and he didn't dislocate your shoulder in the process (that one's a real bitch to deal with!).

Fortunately, you're flying a Falcon.
There's a bit of a breeze.
He's tiny.
You did get a few steps out of him.

I'll tell ya some day about the chick that flew with my mate and I kid you not, jumped on his back... AND... wrapped her legs around his! Thank god that takeoff was a steep one!
How 'bout your mate Steve Parson, I kid you not...

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/09/23/1064082997030.html?from=storyrhs
Hang glider pilot on manslaughter charge after death of tourist
Associated Press - 2003/09/24

A hang glider pilot will be tried for manslaughter after a tourist plunged 200 metres to her death during a tandem flight over a New Zealand alpine town, a court has ruled.

Stephen Parson, 52, of Canada, faces up to ten years in prison if found guilty.

Eleni Zeri, 23, a civil engineering graduate from Athens, died on March 29 after slipping from his hang glider near Queenstown on South Island.

The Queenstown District Court was told Parson had failed to attach Ms Zeri's harness to the glider.

"It is a core requirement. It was of major importance to hook her on and, as a consequence, she died," prosecutor Alistair Garland said.

Parson knew he had a serious problem as soon as he took off because Ms Zeri was hanging too low and the carabiner clip on her harness was not attached to the glider, Mr. Garland told the court.

"She was only holding on with her hands," he said.

Parson had wrapped his legs around her waist to try to keep a grip on her, but Ms Zeri had told him she couldn't hang on much longer, Mr. Garland said.

"She was unable to hold on. She fell ... to the ground," he added.

Ambulance officer Russell Glendinning, whose evidence was read to the court, said Parson told him the accident was his fault.

New Zealand Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association safety officer Glenn Meadows said it was possible Parson had not done a hang check before the fatal flight, or specifically checked the carabiner.

"In the takeoff photograph you could clearly see the carabiner had not been clipped to the harness," he said.

The date of the trial was not announced.
...wrapping his legs around his female "passenger" less than half his age?

And how 'bout your (former) professional tandem pilot colleague Jon Orders...

http://www.kathrynsreport.com/2012/04/agassiz-british-columbia-hang-gliding.html?m=0
Pilot involved in fatal hang-gliding accident charged with obstructing justice
Orders, who runs Vancouver Hang Gliding and has sixteen years experience, was piloting a tandem glider on Mount Woodside near Agassiz when Godinez started to fall shortly after launch. While Orders struggled to hold on to the young woman, she clutched desperately at the pilot, even grabbing his feet, before she fell.

Her body was found seven hours later in a clearcut, about twenty metres from one of Orders' shoes, after an extensive search.
...getting clutched clutched desperately by the female "passenger" half his age plus two years before she pulled his shoes off?
Ah, the good old days.
Ah, yes. The good old days. I'll bet Extreme Air misses you just as much as you miss them.
Glad you're ok.
Say... Did you write a letter to the court in support of Jon Orders? Did you explain that...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4247
Hook in failure in New Zealand
Jim Rooney - 2006/09/24 21:19:29 UTC

Ok, this thread's a million miles long already (and mostly my fault at that), so I'm not going to feel bad about making it a tad longer.

A couple things to chew on here...

There isn't one sure-fire answer.
If there was, we'd all be doing it already. This thread I think makes this obvious... every single thing people have put forth as "the way", someone else has show how it can fail. Every single one. Argue about the details, but every single one fails.

Here's the real trick of it in my book (especially with new technology, but it applies to methods too)...
Whatever you change only works on that glider/site/whatever.
What happens when you're off flying somewhere else or flying someone else's gear?

Someone suggested putting a red flag on the nose of the glider that gets removed after the hang check... this way, if you haven't hooked in, it's really obvious. Say this works for you and you get used to it. Then you borrow a glider or fly a different site on a rented glider. In your world, no red streamer means "good to go".

Take aussie vs clipin if you like... what happens when you're at a site that you can't use the aussie method with? (I can name you some cliff launches that you can't if you care). Now you're used to the security of the aussie method, and it's not there. You might say that the fear will help you, but your instincts will say otherwise (the fear is highlevel thought, and highlevel thought is the first thing that gets tossed out of your brain.. else we'd never launch unhooked in the first place).

Argue if you will about the examples (whatever), the trick of it isn't the method to me, it's how using new things doesn't work (and actually causes problems) in strange ways (like when going back to "normal" flying after getting used to the new method/device).

Enough about what doesn't work though... what does?
Since we don't have a plug that only fits one way, we fall on lesser methods, but some are better than others...

In particular... Third Party Verification.
You won't save you, but your friends might.
Not always, but they're more reliable than you.
Why do you think that airline checklists (yes our lovely checklists) are check-verified by pilot AND copilot?

That's all I got for ya.
The other topics have been beat to death here.
If there was an answer, we'd all already be doing it.
...nobody really has a procedure of any use in preventing unhooked launches (because if there were one, obviously, everybody would already be doing it and that this was really more a failure on the part of Jon's friends rather than Jon's part?

I'm really surprised to that Jon hasn't been cleared of the negligent homicide charges and that the other pilots that were on launch at the time haven't been arrested.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36233
Dennis Pagen cross country seminar
Paraglider Collapse - 2014/02/08 04:23:28 UTC

Lousy writer, worse pilot. Not sure Dennis Pagen can teach anything of any benefit to anyone past Beginner level.
He has no fuckin' business teaching anything to anyone at any level. One does this job totally right or not at all - and that motherfucker's a font of deliberate misinformation.
Dontsink - 2014/02/08 05:01:43 UTC

Aahh, generous measures of arrogance and ignorance, in exquisite balance.
And i'm not talking about Dennis...

Wish I could attend the seminar, but I'm grounded for six months at the least. Duh!.
If you ever do get a chance to attend one of his seminars ask the highly esteemed coauthor of the excellent book, Towing Aloft, by Dennis Pagen and Bill Bryden:
- if he has any thoughts on the Zack Marzec fatality a year and ten days ago
- what protocols were violated to make that tragedy possible/inevitable
- why he didn't think it was a significant enough incident to be worthy of a single word's worth of his commentary
- what he thought of the official report from USHGA - if he managed to find it where it was buried on USHGA's website and bothered to read it
Paul Walsh - 2014/02/08 09:58:16 UTC

He would be well placed to teach you some respect.
Yeah, that's one thing you can say about Dennis - he's always managed to have himself well placed.
Again, if you dont want to go to the seminar, thats fine.
Here's an account the demise of a previous graduate of one of Dennis's XC seminars:
Dennis Pagen - 2005/01

SUMMER 2004 ACCIDENT REPORTS

FATAL TOWING ACCIDENT

The first accident occurred in Germany at an aerotowing competition. The pilot launched with his Litespeed and climbed to about 40 feet when he encountered a thermal that lifted him well above the tug. After a few moments, the glider was seen to move to the side and rapidly turn nose down to fly into the ground, still on tow, in a classic lockout maneuver. The impact was fatal.

Analysis

This pilot was a good up-and-coming competition pilot. He had been in my cross-country course three years ago, and this was his second year of competition. What happened to him is not too unusual or mysterious. He encountered so much lift that although he was pulling in the base bar as far as he could, he did not have enough pitch-down control to get the nose down and return to proper position behind the tug. This situation is known as an over-the-top lockout.

I am personally familiar with such a problem, because it happened to me at a meet in Texas. Soon after lift-off the trike tug and I were hit by the mother of all thermals. Since I was much lighter, I rocketed up well above the tug, while the very experienced tug pilot, Neal Harris, said he was also lifted more than he had ever been in his heavy trike. I pulled in all the way, but could see that I wasn't going to come down unless something changed. I hung on and resisted the tendency to roll to the side with as strong a roll input as I could, given that the bar was at my knees. I didn't want to release, because I was so close to the ground and I knew that the glider would be in a compromised attitude. In addition, there were hangars and trees on the left, which is the way the glider was tending. By the time we gained about 60 feet I could no longer hold the glider centered--I was probably at a 20-degree bank--so I quickly released before the lockout to the side progressed. The glider instantly whipped to the side in a wingover maneuver. I cleared the buildings, but came very close to the ground at the bottom of the wingover. I leveled out and landed.

Analyzing my incident made me realize that had I released earlier I probably would have hit the ground at high speed at a steep angle. The result may have been similar to that of the pilot in Germany. The normal procedure for a tow pilot, when the hang glider gets too high, is to release in order to avoid the forces from the glider pulling the tug nose-down into a dangerous dive. This dangerous dive is what happened when Chris Bulger (U.S. team pilot) was towing John Pendry (former world champion) years ago. The release failed to operate in this case, and Chris was fatally injured. However Neal kept me on line until I had enough ground clearance, and I believe he saved me from injury by doing so. I gave him a heart-felt thank you.

The pilot in the accident under discussion was an aerodynamic engineer. He had altered his glider by lengthening the front cables and shortening the rear cables to move his base tube back. The amount was reportedly 10 centimeters, or about 4 inches. This is well within the acceptable range, according to Gerolf Heinrichs, the Litespeed designer. Why the pilot altered his bar position in this manner is anyone's guess, but my guess is that it was because he felt the bar was too far out on the glider with the VG off. This Litespeed was the pilot's first topless glider and I expect he wasn't informed that most of the new topless gliders experience a great movement of the base tube as the VG is pulled through its range. The result is that the bar is so far out and the pitch pressure so strong that with the VG off, that the standard procedure is to take off and land with at least 1/4 VG. If the pilot didn't know this he would have been tempted to move the bar.

Factors that attributed to the accident in various degrees were the pilot's experience, the conditions and the alteration of the base tube. To begin, he wasn't greatly experienced in aerotowing, although he had learned and spent much of his flying with surface tow. It is difficult to assess the effect of the turbulence, but suffice it to say that it was strong enough to project him upward, well above the tug. Finally, the alteration of the basetube position could have been a contributing factor because he certainly would have had more pitch authority if he hadn't done that. It is impossible to tell, but perhaps the thermal that lifted him would not have done so as severely if he had had a bit more pitch travel.

What We Can Learn

To begin, alteration of our gliders should not be done without full agreement and guidance from the factory or their trained representatives. Even with such approval, be aware that the factory might not know how you will be using your equipment. Changing the pitch range of a glider is a fairly serious matter and should only be done with full understanding of all the effects.

Secondly, over-the-top lockouts are not frequent, but common enough in big-air towing that tow pilots should all have a plan to deal with them. Think about this: When we are lifted well above the tug, the tow system forces becomes similar to surface towing, with the limit of tow force only being the weak link. The susceptibility to a lockout is increased in this situation.

My experience leads me to believe that a strong thermal hitting when low can push you vertically upwards or sideways before you have time to react. If this happens when I am low, I fight it as hard as I can until I have clearance to release safely. If I am high above the tug, I stay on line with the bar pulled in as far as possible and keep myself centered if at all possible. I fully expect the tug pilot to release from his end if necessary for safety, but in the case of a malfunction, I would release before endangering the tug.

We are taught to release at the first sign of trouble, and I fully support that general policy, but in some cases, the trouble happens so fast and is so powerful that a release low would have severe consequences. In my case, I was instantly high above the tug with a strong turn tendency and a release at that point would have been ugly. The main point for us to understand is that we must gain our experience in gradually increasing challenges so we can respond correctly when faced with different emergencies. It should be made clear again that a weak link will not prevent lockouts and a hook knife is useless in such a situation, for the second you reach for it you are in a compromised attitude.

Thirdly, experienced pilots should be aware that towing only from the shoulders reduces the effective pull-in available to prevent an over-the-top lockout. Like many pilots, I prefer the freedom of towing from the shoulders, but I am aware that I must react quicker to pitch excursion. Sometimes reactions aren't quick enough and emergency procedures must be followed. It seems to me that we shouldn't be overly eager to encourage lower airtime pilots to adopt this more advanced method of aerotowing. Normally, we tow topless gliders with about 1/3 VG pulled to lighten pitch forces and increase speed. Intermediate gliders are often towed as much as 1/2 VG pulled for the same reasons. Pilots must understand these matters when aerotowing.

Finally, I think it is appropriate to remind all dealers, instructors and pilots in general to inform their customers and friends that the new topless gliders exhibit the notable bar movement with VG travel as explained above. As such, it is normal to take off and land with 1/4 VG on in order to place the bar in a position to roll easier and to reduce the pitch pressure. It is much easier to maintain safe control speed with the VG pulled 1/4.
- No name, date, location, release type, glider size, weak link strength.

- No bridle type. Just an implication that it was one point.

- Note the contradictions here:
After a few moments, the glider was seen to move to the side and rapidly turn nose down to fly into the ground, still on tow, in a classic lockout maneuver. The impact was fatal.
What happened to him is not too unusual or mysterious. He encountered so much lift that although he was pulling in the base bar as far as he could, he did not have enough pitch-down control to get the nose down and return to proper position behind the tug.
It should be made clear again that a weak link will not prevent lockouts...
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

Weak links very clearly will provide protection from excessive angles of attack, high bank turns and the like for this form of towing.
And we know the weak links involved were Rooney or equivalent 'cause:
-- Dennis uses Rooney Links
-- the DHV mandates Rooney Link equivalents
-- Dennis would've had a field day blaming a stronglink for causing the glider to lock out and slam in still on tow
However Neal kept me on line until I had enough ground clearance, and I believe he saved me from injury by doing so. I gave him a heart-felt thank you.
We are taught to release at the first sign of trouble, and I fully support that general policy, but in some cases, the trouble happens so fast and is so powerful that a release low would have severe consequences. In my case, I was instantly high above the tug with a strong turn tendency and a release at that point would have been ugly. The main point for us to understand is that we must gain our experience in gradually increasing challenges so we can respond correctly when faced with different emergencies.
I didn't want to release, because I was so close to the ground and I knew that the glider would be in a compromised attitude.
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

Pro Tip: Always thank the tug pilot for intentionally releasing you, even if you feel you could have ridden it out. He should be given a vote of confidence that he made a good decision in the interest of your safety.
...and a hook knife is useless in such a situation, for the second you reach for it you are in a compromised attitude.
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

One drawback to single point is that it is not easy to incorporate a secondary release so a hook knife must be handy in flight.
- Remember what Paraglider said about Dennis being a lousy writer?
Factors that attributed to the accident...
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

With other forms of ground towing, the pressure is automatically regulated by the hydraulic or clutch systems.
...
The glider floated on the water with the pilot wearing water skies hanging below.
Towing Aloft is riddled with the use of the word "pressure" to describe the force pulling the glider up, grammatical errors, typos and padded with redundant junk to make the book thicker - while curiously omitting any reference to any advantage to be had with a release which allows the pilot to blow tow with both hands on the basetube.

- Remember what Paraglider said about Dennis being a lousy pilot?
I am personally familiar with such a problem, because it happened to me at a meet in Texas. Soon after lift-off the trike tug and I were hit by the mother of all thermals.
I pulled in all the way, but could see that I wasn't going to come down unless something changed. I hung on and resisted the tendency to roll to the side with as strong a roll input as I could, given that the bar was at my knees.
By the time we gained about 60 feet I could no longer hold the glider centered--I was probably at a 20-degree bank--so I quickly released before the lockout to the side progressed. The glider instantly whipped to the side in a wingover maneuver.
Analyzing my incident made me realize that had I released earlier I probably would have hit the ground at high speed at a steep angle.
My experience leads me to believe that a strong thermal hitting when low can push you vertically upwards or sideways before you have time to react.
In my case, I was instantly high above the tug with a strong turn tendency and a release at that point would have been ugly.
It should be made clear again that a weak link will not prevent lockouts and a hook knife is useless in such a situation, for the second you reach for it you are in a compromised attitude.
Thirdly, experienced pilots should be aware that towing only from the shoulders reduces the effective pull-in available to prevent an over-the-top lockout. Like many pilots, I prefer the freedom of towing from the shoulders, but I am aware that I must react quicker to pitch excursion.
He's not a pilot. He's a goddam dope on a rope, pro toad passenger with bent pin "equipment" that stinks on ice and whose life is entirely dependent on the whims of his tug driver and 130 pound Greenspot emergency release and the luck of having just enough altitude to pull out.

He tells us the bald faced lie that:
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

Weak links very clearly will provide protection from excessive angles of attack, high bank turns and the like for this form of towing.
and conspicuously ignores the fact that the only reason his useless ass isn't just as dead as Zack Marzec's is because his Rooney Link very clearly DIDN'T provide protection from excessive angles of attack, high bank turns and the like for this form of towing.

And then he tries to snow us with loads of pseudo-competent/superior bullshit like:
I didn't want to release, because I was so close to the ground and I knew that the glider would be in a compromised attitude.
Analyzing my incident made me realize that had I released earlier I probably would have hit the ground at high speed at a steep angle. The result may have been similar to that of the pilot in Germany.
Secondly, over-the-top lockouts are not frequent, but common enough in big-air towing that tow pilots should all have a plan to deal with them.
My experience leads me to believe that a strong thermal hitting when low can push you vertically upwards or sideways before you have time to react. If this happens when I am low, I fight it as hard as I can until I have clearance to release safely. If I am high above the tug, I stay on line with the bar pulled in as far as possible and keep myself centered if at all possible.
The main point for us to understand is that we must gain our experience in gradually increasing challenges so we can respond correctly when faced with different emergencies.
"I'm a real pilot, I can handle this, if I release early, the tug pilot makes a good decision in the interest of my safety, or the Rooney Link very clearly provides protection from excessive angles of attack, high bank turns and the like for this form of towing I'm gonna be in a COMPROMISED ATTITUDE - certainly not smeared all over the runway like the bozo who altered his basetube position by reconfiguring his wires and using a pro toad bridle or Zack Marzec who altered his basetube position just with a pro toad bridle.

"And I'm totally cool with instantly whipping to the side in a wingover maneuver when I execute the easy reach to my Industry Standard bent pin barrel release. Good thing it worked though - 'cause if I'd had to reach for my handy-in-flight hook knife I'd have instantly been in a compromised attitude, which is MUCH WORSE than instantly whipping to the side in a wingover maneuver."

- Yes, the modification of the glider was an attributory factor. But it was pretty much dwarfed by the attribution of the pro toad bridle and its effect on pitch control range. But that issue isn't the one that gets the top billing and print space and is mentioned pretty much as an afterthought and the motherfucker's telling us that whatever happens to us flying pro toad is manageable.

- These two incidents - the German fatal and Pagen's lucky-for-him/tragedy-for-hang-gliding narrow miss - are carbon copy prequels for the Zack Marzec fatal.

Dennis tells us:
What happened to him is not too unusual or mysterious.
Yet the Industry shits responsible for this one are telling us:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Paul Tjaden - 2013/02/07 23:47:58 UTC

I wish I could shed more light on this accident but I am afraid this is all we know and probably will know.
Davis Straub - 2013/02/13 15:45:22 UTC

IMHO aerotowing is relatively safe compared with foot launching. I would certainly like to make it safer. What we would all like to know is what could we do to make it safer.

We have no agreement that a stronger weaklink would make it safer (again, I fly with a slightly stronger weaklink).
William Olive - 2013/02/27 20:55:06 UTC

Like the rest of us, you have no idea what really happened on that tow.
We probably never will know.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/05 19:42:58 UTC

Wow...
So you know what happened then?
OMG... thank you for your expert accident analysis. You better fly down to FL and let them know. I'm sure they'll be very thankful to have such a crack expert mind on the case analyzing an accident that you know nothing about. Far better data than the people that were actually there. In short... get fucked.
So how come the sonuvabitch doesn't step in and tell us that what happened with what happened to Zack was not too unusual or mysterious?
Why the obsessive need to trash people you really dont know.
How the fuck do you know how well he does or doesn't know Dennis? And how - with the volume of printed material Dennis has been perpetrating on the public since near the dawn of the sport - is it possible for any critical reader NOT to really know him?
When did you last fly with Dennis?
Who the fuck cares? If he tops the stack and nails the traffic cone with a no-stepper does that make him a great pilot and/or someone highly qualified to give a seminar on XC flying? Jon Orders was a highly experienced tandem driver with lotsa competition notches in his belt and less than two days ago he got sentenced for a felony conviction for criminal negligence for doing to his passenger at Mount Woodside on 2012/04/28 the same thing that Dennis did to himself at Morningside on 1993/09/28.
Have you ever attended one of his seminars, so are qualified in making such a sweeping negative comment?
I have. And I've attended one of his instructor certification clinics, flown with him plenty of times, stayed at his place, crewed for him, chased him, read tons of his books, magazine articles, incident reports. The guy's totally full of shit.
No you never have.
If you know the answer then how come you asked the question?
You certainly have problems...
Maybe. I know I, you, lotsa other people do sure do. So what?
...and I suspect that dodgy commenting on a forum is the least of them.
His commenting didn't seem dodgy to me. Compare/Contrast with crap like:
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

Caution: For aerotowing tandem, weak links should be lighter than for surface towing tandem. One commercial aerotow operation uses the same weak link for tandem towing as they use for solo with very good results and a wide safety margin.

Three recent aerotowing accidents have occurred--one fatal. The common thread in all three was a lockout and the use of a much too heavy weak link. Tandem gliders are much less responsive than smaller gliders and the pilot in command often has a less than ideal position on the control bar. The situation shouldn't be compromised by an over-strength weak link.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 04:55:25 UTC

It always amazes to hear know it all pilots arguing with the professional pilots.
I mean seriously, this is our job.
We do more tows in a day than they do in a month (year for most).

We *might* have an idea of how this stuff works.
They *might* do well to listen.
Not that they will, mind you... cuz they *know*.

I mean seriously... ridgerodent's going to inform me as to what Kroop has to say on this? Seriously? Steve's a good friend of mine. I've worked at Quest with him. We've had this discussion ... IN PERSON. And many other ones that get misunderstood by the general public. It's laughable.

So, argue all you like.
I don't care.
I've been through all these arguments a million times... this is my job.
I could be more political about it, but screw it... I'm not in the mood to put up with tender sensibilities... Some weekend warrior isn't about to inform me about jack sh*t when it comes to towing. I've got thousands upon thousands of tows under my belt. I don't know everything, but I'll wager the house that I've got it sussed a bit better than an armchair warrior.
Go Dennis.
Go fuck yourself, Dennis. Ditto for your groupies - especially Paul here.
Fred Wilson - 2014/02/10 15:51:08 UTC

These resources could use more input! Please contribute!

Thermaling Tips Wiki
http://www.hanggliding.org/wiki/Thermaling_tips
+ XC Coaching Manuals
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=24115
+ RASP Wiki
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=28512
Oh, I'd SO love to - but...

http://www.hanggliding.org/wiki/HG_ORG_Mission_Statement
HG ORG Mission Statement - Hang Gliding Wiki
HangGliding.Org Rules and Policies

No posts or links about Bob K, Scott C Wise, Tad Eareckson and related people, or their material. ALL SUCH POSTS WILL BE IMMEDIATELY DELETED. These people are poison to this sport and are permanently banned from this site in every possible way imaginable.
Dennis:

Could you publish your course outline here?
Dennis:

Think you could spare a moment to rappel down from your pedestal long enough to interact with any of the rabble that inhabits internet discussion groups? Or are you afraid that after two or three seconds worth of exposure on an interactive medium you'd get your ass blown to shreds so thoroughly that it would take you weeks just to locate all the pieces?
Fred Wilson - 2014/02/10 16:06:00 UTC

Image
Yeah, we certainly wouldn't wanna have any heated exchanges on any hang gliding issues...
Dr. Trisa Tilletti 1 - 2012/06

Unlike the FAA's relatively clear-cut legal rules, the practical aspects of weak link technology and application are not so clear-cut. For some people, talking about weak links is more like talking about religion, politics, or global warming--they can get very emotional about it and have difficulty discussing it logically, rationally, or with civility.
Dr. Trisa Tilletti 1 - 2012/06

So let's try to talk about it rationally, logically, and practically here.
We might upset the perfect order that's been achieved by the pillars of the sport over the course of the past two or three decades.
The less you respond to rude, critical, argumentative people, the more peaceful your life will become.
Donnell Hewett - 1980/12

Now I've heard the argument that "Weak links always break at the worst possible time, when the glider is climbing hard in a near stall situation."
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/12 18:00:27 UTC

I get tired as hell "refuting" all these mouth release and "strong link" arguments. Dig through the forums if you want that. I've been doing it for years but unfortunately the peddlers are religious in their beliefs so they find justification any way they can to "prove" their stuff. This is known as "Confirmation Bias"... seeking data to support your theory... it's back-asswards. Guess what? The shit doesn't work. If it did, we'd be using it everywhere. But it doesn't stand the test
of reality.
Tormod Helgesen - 2013/02/12 18:15:49 UTC

I'm with you here Jim, Deltaman just startet an argument with me on a subject we agree on, the man is clearly deranged.
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/17 00:34:14 UTC

YOU are the one arguing with a system that's been in place and has been worked on over quite literally HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of tows.

The onus is on YOU.
Not the other way around.
"We" don't need to justify jack.

You want to take pot shots... go for it. I couldn't give a toss.
You don't like my answers... again, get bent.

You're the newbie.
You want to bring in something new?... go for it... it's to YOU to justify it.
It is not to us to justify what we do.

We've been at this a long time and have gone over and over all these little arguments before that you think are "new".
They're new to you.
But they're old hat to "us".
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/17 10:37:47

I'm not sure who you're arguing with Zack, but it's sure not me... cuz man... you've got some pretty big hangups mate.

You're hear to argue. Plain and simple. I've got better stuff to do.
Go blow smoke somewhere else. I couldn't give a rats ass... I won't be towing you so what do I care?
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/03 19:37:19 UTC

It saddens me to know that the rantings of the fanatic fringe mask the few people who are actually working on things. The fanaticism makes it extremely hard to have a conversation about these things as they always degrade into arguments. So I save the actual conversations for when I'm talking with people in person.

A fun saying that I picked up... Some people listen with the intent of understanding. Others with the intent of responding.
I like that.
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/04 19:31:36 UTC

So, if you're interested in discussing something, let me know.
If you're just here to argue, dude, I've got so much better shit to waste my time with.
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/05 19:42:58 UTC

So, a stronger weaklink allows you to achieve higher AOAs... but you see high AOAs coupled with a loss of power as *the* problem? So you want something that will allow you to achieve even higher AOAs?
Are you NUTS?

I'm tired of arguing with crazy.
As I said many times... there are those that listen with the intent of responding... you unfortunately are one.

You've done a great job of convincing me never to tow you.
Thank you for that.
Mission accomplished.
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/10 08:12:02 UTC

You're the one all gooei-eye'd over weaklink strengths.
If you'd stop and actually listen rather than just collecting things to argue about, you might actually learn what the hell I'll tow and what I won't.
But alas, that's not going to happen.
Some people just live to argue.
You can't help it. I know, I know.
I'd say it's ok, but it wouldn't be true.

If you were hear to understand something or to have a rational discussion, then we might have something to talk about.
But alas, you're just here to argue.
You've got all your BS theories set in your head and you're just spouting them.
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/10 22:58:21 UTC

Jim has inferred... No, you have assumed.
Or better, you're not listenin , you're looking for stuff to argue about.
Lacking stuff to argue with, you're making stuff up and trying to fit me into your bullshit narrative.
Yeah Fred, you stay the hell out of the front lines where the "arguments" are happening. And you enjoy the peaceful life you get by ignoring all us rude, critical, argumentative people while you're flying your imaginary Sopwith Camel against an imaginary Fokker Dr.1.

And I SO do hope that when the REAL world rears its ugly head on your ass and all you've got going for you is the kind of crap that Dennis Rooney-Pagen perpetrates on his customers that you get a real big chunk of it bitten off.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3840
[TIL] About Tad Eareckson
Orion Price - 2013/03/10 05:57:24 UTC
Northridge, California

(Today I learned) There is a guy who reads our forum every and does detailed analysis on all our comments. This guy has Rafferty amounts of extra time to just be an idiot and not fly/work/live.

In place of adding to our discourse he bought a website in which he makes comments about our comments. That's just weird. Apparently we are all we are all suicidal idiots and destroying the sport. Also he apparently really doesn't like NME_RIDER/LA Glide. JD to him is apparently Satan with a glider and a youtube account.
http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3275
OPs arm
Image
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30722
What happened to JD?
Image
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36446
Mark Knight dies in Dragonfly crash
Davis Straub - 2014/02/24 13:23:27 UTC

I assume at the Phoenix Regional airport northwest of the Francisco Grande (Francisco Grande, Casa Grande, Arizona, USA)
Matt Barker

He was getting ready to land the tug yesterday evening and it spun in and we lost Mark.
Image
Must've been landing with a solo glider using a stronglink behind him...

http://ozreport.com/3.066
Weaklinks
Davis Straub - 1999/06/06

The problem with strong links (neither Bobby Bailey nor I was aware at the time of the US Nationals that pilots were doing this) is that they endanger the tug pilot. If the hang glider pilot goes into a lock out, and doesn't break the weaklink (because there isn't one), they can stall the tug. I assume that Bobby Bailey won't hear about the use of strong links at the US Nationals until he reads it here.
I'm pretty sure that's the only way it's possible for a Dragonfly to stall.

Sorry Mark, I found you to be a coward, liar, and thief so forgive me if I don't get too upset about this one - although if I could've had my druthers Rooney would be my no brainer pick with Adam Elchin as a fair substitute. And Jim Gaar piling in on the Dragonfly he's gotten everyone to believe he flies would make my day if his death weren't just imaginary.

Here's one of your students getting his hang gliding career ended by the focal point of his safe towing system increasing the safety of the towing operation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYe3YmdIQTM


shortly after you "qualified" him.

Here's Zack Marzec's glider a few hours after the Rooney Link inconvenienced him on the last flight of his career:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bRrpHNa68iY/UQ6Pv9gRZyI/AAAAAAAAjTg/Hc22bx5122Q/s2048/20943781_BG1.jpg
Image

eighteen days shy of a year later.

And here's the entirety of your contribution to that discussion:

...

I hope this will be found to have been another control system failure - ideally the same one that killed Keavy Nenninger on 2011/07/23 at Ridgely and got swept under the rug.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27909
Dragonfly Accident at Lookout
Jim Rooney - 2012/06/09 03:05:22 UTC

BTW, you have no need or use of reminding me of the other tug pilot that we lost.
She was a friend of mine and an exceptionally close friend of my mates.
You will likewise not be able to inform me of anything regarding her accident.
Allow me to inform you.
She was a rookie and it was a rookie mistake made under duress and extremely low.
And your little string thing wouldn't have done jack shit in her case either.
Go ahead, Jim... Let's see you write this one off as another rookie mistake made under duress and extremely low.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 08:24:31 UTC

Thought I already answered that one... instead of quoting myself (have a look back if you don't believe me), I'll just reiterate it.

I don't advocate anything.
I use what we use at the flight parks. It's time tested and proven... and works a hell of a lot better than all the other bullshit I've seen out there.

130lb greenspot (greenspun?) cortland fishing line.
In stock at Quest, Highland, Eastern Shore, Kitty Hawk Kites, Florida Ridge, and I'm pretty sure Wallaby, Lookout and Morningside.
Not sure what Tracy up at Cloud Nine uses, but I'll put bets on the same.

Did I miss any?
Is it clear what I mean by "We"?
I didn't make the system up.
And I'm not so arrogant to think that my precious little ideas are going to magically revolutionise the industry.
There are far smarter people than me working this out.
I know, I've worked with them.
(Bobby's a fucking genius when it comes to this shit... for example.)
It's only fair that we kill a few front end people as a consequence of this fucking genius's engineering every now and then as well.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TUGS/message/1148
Tug Rates
Mark Knight - 2011/02/10 19:57:25 UTC

Learn the facts.
You have no idea what happened.
Yeah Mark? So what you wrote about Shane Smith was total crap?

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=818
Peter (Linknife) Birren
Peter Birren - 2011/11/27 02:13:08 UTC

No, I'm not going to comment on Arlan's accident and you really ought to quit as well because neither you nor I were there. The difference is that you have no trouble talking out your ass about that which you know nothing about. I could, however, speculate on several scenarios from having spoken at great length with the tug pilot and eyewitnesses. How many of those at the site did you speak with?
Don't ya just love this sport in which only the privileged elite are permitted to know what actually happened and us weekend warrior muppets...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
William Olive - 2013/02/27 20:55:06 UTC

Like the rest of us, you have no idea what really happened on that tow.
We probably never will know.
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/28 01:17:55 UTC

Well said Billo
I'm a bit sick of all the armchair experts telling me how my friend died.

Ah but hg'ers get so uppity when you tell them not to speculate.
...are ordered by you Dragonfly assholes to swallow whatever we're being told and be happy with the coverups?

Double edged sword, dude. My money's on you being spun in and killed was a result of the same control system failure that spun Keavy in and killed her. We got shit from the NTSB and we got shit from Ridgely. Speculation is pretty much always a few thousand times better than nothing but we didn't even get that - just some total crap about a totally unspecified and fictional "rookie mistake" from your good buddy Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney. And if we'd had something better to work with prior to last evening...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36446
Mark Knight dies in Dragonfly crash
Andrew Vanis - 2014/02/24 16:11:46 UTC

What a shame. Mark was a great guy.
Yeah Andrew, so was Arlan Birkett. Everybody in this game is a great guy - especially tug drivers after they slam in.

And when they slam other people in (Corey Burk - Arizona Hang Gliding Center, Gary Solomon - Hang Glide Chicago) they're still pretty good guys but we tend not to talk about them very much.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »


Hang Gliding Aerotow Lesson with Mark Knight
Ann Dunlap - 2012/04/17 21:48
Ann Dunlap - Colorado - 81652 - H3 - 2013/09/21 - Mark Windsheimer - AT FL ST PA FSL HA
Hang Gliding Aerotow Lesson with Mark Knight
How 'bout a tandem mountain launch lesson with Jon Orders or Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney?
2012/03/27 18:30 MDT

Part of my Aerotow training to have enough tandem flights until my instructor feels I'm ready to solo.
How sure are you that your instructor is ready to solo? Would you have had any problem going up with this guy?:

37-23223
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3713/9655904048_89cce6423a_o.png
Image

Would you have given him the green to go solo in any reasonable conditions?
1:50 - See Mark look over?
Yeah, I do. He's looking over so's he can locate the bicycle brake lever he's got velcroed to his downtube. Think he's gonna be able to effect that action well and fast enough in a low level lockout emergency to keep the glider from slamming in?
British Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association Technical Manual - 2003/04

On tow the Pilot in Command must have his hand actually on the release at all times. 'Near' the release is not close enough! When you have two hands completely full of locked-out glider, taking one off to go looking for the release guarantees that your situation is going to get worse before it gets better.
The assholes at BHPA don't - for tandem gliders anyway. For sixteen year old student solos on the other hand...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-18009038
BBC News - Girl killed in crash was 'too light' for hang glider
On her second attempt the same day, the glider started deviating to the left while still attached to the aircraft towing it.

An instructor on the ground said he saw Miss Preston attempt to correct this by moving her weight, but it was not sufficient, the report said.

He made a radio call telling her to release from the towing pilot, which she did.

The glider then descended in a spiral and hit the concrete and asphalt runway, and Miss Preston sustained a severe head injury.

The report said: "The instructor later commented that he had been startled by the speed with which the accident had happened and his impression was that the situation was not recoverable."
No problem!
He's planning something...
He never planned anything in the course of his entire useless life.
2:06 - A little pop quiz on how to handle a weak link break.
- Oh good. And if/when you pass this little pop quiz you'll know exactly how to handle a weak link break.

- Couple thousand feet, smooth air, glider situation normal... Cool. You're in compliance with USHGA SOPs for the drill and it's safe to simulate a weak link break.

- Ever wonder how well things would've gone if he'd simulated a weak link break at 0:17 - which is where the focal point of your safe towing system tends to kick in in the REAL world?

- What weak link strength were you using on the tandem, how did that translate to towline tension in pounds and percent of the max certified operating weight of the glider?

- Were you inside of the FAA's legal range and was the Dragonfly's weak link heavier than the glider's and thus also in legal compliance?

- Here's what Mark said about his solo weak link:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32824
Weaklink testing
Mark Knight - 2013/07/04 13:47:57 UTC

My calculations and test suggest the 200 lb. is right for me. I weigh 185 pounds, fly a T2 154 (75 lbs), and my harness fully loaded is 35 pounds. Total all up flying weight is 185 + 75+ 35 = 295 lbs. Times 1.4 = 413. I use Pro tow barrel release so divide by 2 = 206.5. I feel the White and purple is a good fit for me.
-- Were you doing something comparable with the tandem?
-- Why not?
-- Did you ask him to explain his FEELINGS on the issue?

- What did Mark tell you was the purpose of the weak link? Steve Kroop says:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/skysailingtowing/message/4633
Weaklinks and aerotowing (ONLY)
Steve Kroop - 2005/02/10 04:50:59 UTC

Weak links are there to protect the equipment not the glider pilot. Anyone who believes otherwise is setting them selves up for disaster.
But Mark's weak link testing buddy - Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney says:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 04:55:25 UTC

I mean seriously... ridgerodent's going to inform me as to what Kroop has to say on this? Seriously? Steve's a good friend of mine. I've worked at Quest with him. We've had this discussion ... IN PERSON. And many other ones that get misunderstood by the general public. It's laughable.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 02:44:10 UTC

The "purpose" of a weaklink is to increase the safety of the towing operation. PERIOD.
Don't you find that just a bit confusing? Doesn't that make you wonder just a little about whether or not these guys all have their heads up their asses?

- How do you think tandem aerotow instructor DocSoc here:

0:50
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR_4jKLqrus


did on his live fire weak link recovery exercise?

- Did you have an opinion on the Zack Marzec inconvenience incident that went down a week shy of ten months after you passed your little pop quiz on how to handle a weak link break with flying colors? I didn't hear you voice it.
2:14 - Pull in and turn... Right... away from the tug.
Yeah, you handled that beautifully. If you and Mark had just let go of the control frame gawd only knows what might have happened but it would've almost certainly been pretty ugly and involved a collision with the tug.
2:48 - Here I think we are talking about using 45 deg. angles to set up a spot landing on the X.
Yep. Hitting that X is critical. And when you're flying XC you should always carry a traffic cone you can drop in case you don't have a clearly defined spot to aim for.

Great job, Mark. I have no idea how well the sport will be able to carry on without you.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36446
Mark Knight dies in Dragonfly crash
Jim Gaar - 2014/02/24 18:25:14 UTC

!

As a former Tug owner...
Tug OWNER?! I've always been under the impression that you were a tug PILOT and not a convicted pedophile and thus stocked with opinions worth listening to. Hell, just about anybody can buy a tug - or, failing that, rip one off from Warren.
...this just hurts so bad...
I know, I too am heartbroken over this.
RIP my friend and condolences to family and friends.
Let's not forget...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYe3YmdIQTM


...his victims!
Mark was huge asset to the hang gliding community.
Yeah, I was just thinking the same thing myself - 'specially with respect to the pioneering work on fishing line strengths he did in conjunction with Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney and his feelings on the issue.
:cry:
:cry:

Fuck you, Rodie.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2871
speed link
Jim Rooney - 2007/12/13 18:07:02 UTC

Wow, so this is what I get when I try to be civil?
Oh, so civil isn't your default mode. That would be inconsiderate, arrogant, stupid, nasty, egomaniacal. Yeah, big surprise. Take care you don't seriously strain anything with the exertion.
Oh well, very nice. Enjoy being pissed. I don't care.
Yeah Jim...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 04:55:25 UTC

I don't care.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 17:34:33 UTC

I don't care...
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/31 09:25:57 UTC

I don't care.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/31 09:25:57 UTC

Again, I don't care...
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/16 05:05:41 UTC

I don't care.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/05 01:32:20 UTC

I don't care...
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/12 15:43:02 UTC

I don't care...
We get it. You don't care. The sport's festering with parasitic little pieces of shit like you who don't give rats' asses about much of anything beyond themselves.
As they often say here on the internet....
Pics or it didn't happen.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/28 10:40:24 UTC

Is a weaklink going to save your ass? Who knows? But it's nice to stack the deck in your favour.
C'mon Jim. You should be able to find us at least ONE video of the focal point of a safe towing system doing something besides dumping a glider into a stall.
I did "bother" to look at your pics. They're cryptic at best.
Yeah, I prepare those things with an assumption that the viewer will have an IQ of twenty-five or better in mind. Sorry, but ya can't please all the people all the time. Especially when your dealing with the dregs who make livings pulling gliders off of runways all season long year after year after year.
How would I know they were component shots otherwise?
You can't seem to figure out that:
- if a Rooney Link is the ideal lockout protector for a 350 pound glider it can't also be the ideal lockout protector for a 350 pound glider
- a double loop of 130 pound Greenspot isn't any more of a threat to the tug on a solo glider than it is on a tandem glider
So I have no idea how you know how to breathe without somebody else managing the operation for you.
Wasting pixels? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
weak links
Jim Rooney - 2007/05/31 13:27:30 UTC

Hahahahaha...
Jim Rooney - 2007/07/22 20:16:36 UTC

HAHAHA
Jim Rooney - 2007/07/22 22:30:28 UTC

Hahahahahahahahaha
Jim Rooney - 2007/07/22 22:30:28 UTC

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA
Jim Rooney - 2007/07/24 13:07:31 UTC

Hahahahaha
Jim Rooney - 2007/07/24 13:07:31 UTC

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3167
Freak accident at Highland
Jim Rooney - 2008/04/18 11:40:20 UTC

BWA HAHAHAHAAHA!
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 06:04:23 UTC

Hahahaha.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 06:04:23 UTC

Hahahahhaa
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/11 19:22:18 UTC

Of course not... it's Asshole-ese.

Sorry, I'm sick and tired of all these soap box bullshit assheads that feel the need to spout their shit at funerals. I just buried my friend and you're seizing the moment to preach your bullshit? GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!!!!!!
Image
...Riiiiight.
Jim Rooney - 2007/07/22 22:30:28 UTC

Riiiiiight...
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24546
Serious accident at SOGA
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/02 19:18:45 UTC

Riiiiight.
Riiiiight.
Pics or it didn't happen pal.
THIS:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bRrpHNa68iY/UQ6Pv9gRZyI/AAAAAAAAjTg/Hc22bx5122Q/s2048/20943781_BG1.jpg
Image

do it for ya - PAL?

I know who your pals are (or were), Jim. I'm not one of them. I totally despise anyone who maintains any degree of diplomatic relations with and/or respect for you.
I bring up the Oz Forum cuz I seriously believe you fear peer review.
- You believe a chintzy loop of fishing line that dumps gliders back on the runway in light morning conditions increases the safety of the towing operation and that Bobby Bailey is a fucking genius when it comes to this shit. Why would would anybody with half a brain or better give a flying fuck about ANYTHING you BELIEVE?

- PEER review?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14931
Tad's release (even more)
Freedomspyder - 2009/02/14 17:43:30 UTC

Tad,
I've found your posts on both hook-in checks and releases very interesting and well thought out.
Best of luck dealing with the Oz Report forum cult and its leader.
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1041
"Sharing" of Hang Gliding Information ?!?
Merlin - 2012/05/26 13:22:30 UTC

I confess to previously having a bit of an Oz Report habit, but the forced login thing has turned me off permanently, and I am in fact grateful. Frankly, the site had pretty much been reduced to a few dedicated sycophants in any case.
The only people over there who can be considered my peers have reviewed my stuff and either been or fallen in line with it. Your numbers, on the other hand...
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/24 16:26:09 UTC

We've been doing this a long time and are quite familiar and comfortable with our processes.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 04:55:25 UTC

It always amazes to hear know it all pilots arguing with the professional pilots.
I mean seriously, this is our job.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 05:23:34 UTC

I don't have any desire to argue with you.
I can share what I know with you, but I have little interest in arguing about it.

So, if you'd like to know, then I can maybe clear some shit up.
But, if this is going to continue to be a bashup, I'll just go back to what I do and ya'll can have your nice misinformed arguments.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 21:40:25

See, the thing is... "we", the people that work at and run aerotow parks, have a long track record.
This stuff isn't new, and has been slowly refined over decades.
We have done quite literally hundreds of thousands of tows.
We know what we're doing.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 02:44:10 UTC

Zach, you can nit pick all you like, but I'll put a 100,000+ flight record over your complaints any day of the week.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 06:04:23 UTC

I don't suffer fools lightly.
I also do not suffer armchair experts... lightly or otherwise.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 07:51:12 UTC

Ok, here's something to chew on, while we're on the topic.
It's not going to taste nice, but it's the god's honest truth.

See, the "everyone's opinion is valid" stuff is for the birds.
No. We don't consider everyone's opinion on these topics.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 08:24:31 UTC

I use what we use at the flight parks. It's time tested and proven... and works a hell of a lot better than all the other bullshit I've seen out there.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 10:11:31 UTC

As I said.
Been through this shit a million freaking times.
Please quit trying to educate me about my job.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 17:34:33 UTC

As I said, I've been through this a million freaking times.
Which is ok.
I don't mind clarifying it for people.

What I do mind is that when there is disagreement, it is generally NOT me that is wrong. Yet people persist in telling me bla bla bla. I don't care if people disagree with me... cuz I know they're wrong. It makes me sad.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 17:34:33 UTC

Those people can get stuffed... they're wrong.

Remember, a weak link improves safety.
Say it over and over and over in your head until it sinks in.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 17:34:33 UTC

See, Russel knows what's up.
He knows that you're changing the equation and because of this, you need to ask the tug pilot.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/28 06:15:12 UTC

You may not know, but Davis is a friend of mine.
We have discussed this many times in person. We are not in disagreement.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/28 10:15:12 UTC

Oh, in case it's not obvious (which it doesn't seem to be), once someone starts telling me what the "sole" purpose of a weaklink is, I tune them out as they have no clue what they're talking about.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/28 10:40:24 UTC

I think what you're picking up on is my lack of willingness to discuss this with people that have already made up their minds.
Sorry for that, but it's just the nature of the beast.

I have no issue with discussing this with people that don't have an agenda.
I get very short with people that do however.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/29 13:40:42 UTC

I said I'm sick to death of inexperienced people arguing with experienced people. It boggles my mind.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/30 02:16:16 UTC

They're not here cuz they don't feel like arguing all the time.
Most of the other people "in the business" don't come here cuz it turns into a shouting match too often.

Look how uppity people got when I even termed people "in the business" "professional pilots".
It's accurate, but some got all offended. They couldn't stand that someone doesn't see their uninformed opinion as holding as much weight as an informed one.
I know (very) basic electronics, but I don't argue with the electrician about which capacitor he uses for the timing circuit in my toaster. It's just not my field.

I know a lot of regular joes that do the same... for the same reason. There's a lot of lurkers here that really really do not care to get sucked into the mud.

I can't blame them, I avoid this place on a regular basis.
It's a shame too, cuz there's a lot of really really nice people in HG. Most are.
And all this sewing circle, drama queen bullshit keeps a lot of very informed people away... ya'll miss out on a lot.
The actual "insider" discussions, that you never see, are so much better.

But man oh man, do people not feel the need to even be civil here sometimes.
Have a think about that next time you're off on a tirade.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/30 03:20:19 UTC

I've not told you to take things on faith.
I have however responded to uninformed arguments with "well, what the f*ck do you know?".

Take the whole premiss of this thread for example.
"Is this a joke?"

This is not a critical thinking question.
This is a lead in to an argument.
The poster has already made up their mind... with a limited background... and is now challenging SOPs of very experienced people and a long vetted process.

So yeah, I feel the response of "well, what the F do you know?" to be rather appropriate.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/31 09:25:57 UTC

Oh how many times I have to hear this stuff.
I've had these exact same arguments for years and years and years.
Nothing about them changes except the new faces spouting them.

It's the same as arguing with the rookie suffering from intermediate syndrome.
They've already made up their mind and only hear that which supports their opinion.

Only later, when we're visiting them in the hospital can they begin to hear what we've told them all along.

Your anecdotal opinion is supposed to sway me?
You forget, every tow flight you take requires a tug pilot... we see EVERY tow.
We know who the rockstars are and who the muppets are.
Do you have any idea how few of us there are?
You think we don't talk?
I'll take our opinion over yours any day of the week.

Ok, I'm tired of this.
I'm not really sure who you're trying to convince.
Again, I don't care to argue this stuff.
I'll answer actual questions if you're keen to actually hear the answers, but arguing with me? Really? Have fun with that.

Gimme a call when you think of something that we haven't already been through years ago... cuz to date, you have yet to come up with anything new. Well, maybe it's new to you I guess. It's old as dirt to me though.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/31 19:49:08 UTC

This is going to be a bit harsh, but I honestly don't care what you think.
You're not the one making the decisions here.
See if you can convince a tug pilot to tow you, with whatever gear you like, then you're sweet.
But we're the ones you need to convince, not the other way around.
So if anyone's trying to "sway" anyone, you need to convince me.
And like I said, I'm over it.
Jim Rooney - 2011/09/02 19:41:27 UTC

You can't look *for* facts to backup your opinion.
That's just bs arguing.
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/11 19:22:18 UTC

I can barely stand these pompus asswipes on a normal day.
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/13 19:09:33

It was already worked out by the time I arrived.
The reason it sticks?
Trail and error.
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/15 06:48:18 UTC

Oh right... you're preaching the sermon of the "purpose of a weaklink". Too bad reality is not so black and white.
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/16 01:35:20

Don't ever stomp over to your tug pilot and "angrily" anything.
That's not going to work out well for you.
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/16 05:05:41 UTC

And yes. It is my call. PERIOD.
On tow, I am the PIC.

Now, that cuts hard against every fiber of every HG pilot on the planet and I get that.
Absolutely no HG pilot likes hearing it. Not me, not no one. BUT... sorry, that's the way it is.
Accept it and move on.
Not only can you not change it, it's the law... in the very literal sense.

So, you're quite right in your thinking in your example. The person you have to convince is me (or whoever your tuggie is).
I've had this conversation with many people.
We've had various outcomes.

What doesn't change however is that it's my call, not yours.
And it's my job to be the "bad guy" sometimes.
Sorry. It's just the way it is.
Deltaman - 2013/02/16 22:41:36 UTC

How is that possible to write so much ..and say NOTHING !?
...are moving in the opposite direction.
It's easy to rant and rave here on this group because most here are very civil and there's no moderation.
Most on that group are stupid clones who swallow whatever shit you Ridgely assholes feed them and with scum like you and your aerotow industry buddies in control of a huge chunk of the sport the very last things that are needed are civility and moderation - especially when enforced by some goddam waste of space like Mark Cavanaugh.
Not so over at Oz. There are also very highly qualified individuals lurking there.
- Very highly qualified to do WHAT?

- Why is the list being kept secret?

- Hell, ever since Davis removed his little shit heap from public view after yet another failure of the hang check method for preventing unhooked launches everything's become secret to a great extent.

- I guess...
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/05 01:32:20 UTC

Carful who you put stock in mate.
Calling blindrodie a fool? Seriously? Easily discounted?
You may not have an understanding of who you're brushing off... In lieu of some people that have been listening to the rantings of, I kid you not, a convicted pedophile. I'm willing to look past the messenger... To a point. But gimme a break... You're blowing off a tug pilot instead?
...Blindrodie's a very highly qualified individual, huh? 'Cause he's widely BELIEVED to be a tug pilot.
I honestly think you're afraid.
You are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT...
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson.
"A bad flyer won't hurt a pin man but a bad pin man can kill a flyer." - Bill Bennett
Jim Rooney - 2007/08/01 13:47:23 UTC

Whatever's going on back there, I can fix it by giving you the rope.
Probably has something to do with my overwhelming superiority...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4247
Hook in failure in New Zealand
Jim Rooney - 2006/09/24 21:19:29 UTC

You might say that the fear will help you, but your instincts will say otherwise (the fear is highlevel thought, and highlevel thought is the first thing that gets tossed out of your brain.. else we'd never launch unhooked in the first place).
...in the highlevel thought department.
But of course you'll have an excuse for not going there.
I've got a good one now...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=592
Linknife
Butch Pritchett - 2010/04/02 23:21:11 UTC

Tad that turd is getting back in the punch bowl.
Tad Eareckson - 2010/04/02 23:23:44 UTC

Fuck you.
Butch Pritchett - 2010/04/02 23:40:24 UTC

There are some people out there that you can't talk to like that with having a bad day sometime later in your life.
Tad Eareckson - 2010/04/03 05:23:45 UTC

Yeah, but if you don't constantly stand up to stupid Nazi scum - even if you hafta do it all by yourself while good men stand by and do nothing - then the stupid Nazi scum is gonna win every time.
Davis Straub - 2010/04/03 12:46:26 UTC

Tad is gone.
But... Ya wanna see (some more) ACTUAL examples of cowardice?

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14230
pro tow set-up
Jim Rooney - 2009/11/03 06:16:56 UTC

God I love the ignore list Image

Tad loves to have things both ways.
First weaklinks are too weak, so we MUST use stronger ones. Not doing so is reckless and dangerous.
Then they're too strong.

I have no time for such circular logic.
I had it with that crap years ago.
http://www.hanggliding.org/wiki/HG_ORG_Mission_Statement
HG ORG Mission Statement - Hang Gliding Wiki
HangGliding.Org Rules and Policies

No posts or links about Bob K, Scott C Wise, Tad Eareckson and related people, or their material. ALL SUCH POSTS WILL BE IMMEDIATELY DELETED. These people are poison to this sport and are permanently banned from this site in every possible way imaginable.
http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=28697
Weak links why do we use them. in paragliding.
Forum Moderators - 2010/02/24 22:02:46 UTC

We, the Moderators, feel that weak links are an important topic. In our view Tad Eareckson's posts have discouraged others from taking part in this discussion, so, after several warnings, he has been banned. His most recent post, after this topic was locked, is here. We are happy to lift the ban if we come to the view that Tad has further positive contributions to make - please contact us by PM or by email if you feel that this is the case.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22660
What can be learned from this "scooter" towing accident?
Davis Straub - 2011/02/07 19:21:29 UTC

Okay, enough. On to new threads.
Peter Birren - 2012/05/17 12:12:12 UTC

Games

Tad,

I deleted your last note to the Towing List. Far too long and off topic.

Make me work too much and I'll be deleting you as well. Your rants and bullying attempts will not be tolerated. (Save that line for later use to prove how persecuted you are.)

Keep it on topic and readable, no problem.
Tad Eareckson - 2012/05/17 15:26:57 UTC

Re: Games

Get fucked.
http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3840
[TIL] About Tad Eareckson
Bob Kuczewski - 2013/03/10 18:20:34 UTC

I first learned about Tad Eareckson when I was Regional Director and the USHPA Board circulated a letter he had written (with intention to send?) to the FAA about some dangerous practices in hang gliding.

The Board's knee-jerk response was to try to take some kind of legal action to silence Tad. I indicated that I thought we shouldn't be sending our lawyers in as our first response, and that maybe we should have someone talk with him first. So Dennis Pagen volunteered, and I believe the matter was settled without any serious damage to the sport.

A few years later (when I was starting the US Hawks Hang Gliding Association), I actually wrote to Tad inviting him to our forum because I wanted to incorporate diverse views in our new association. Tad joined us, and for a while things were fine. But over time, it became obvious to me that he was more interested in just bashing people than trying to actually solve problems in the sport of hang gliding. For a long time, I tried to show him kindness on our forum and I gave him a lot of slack with regard to his profanity and his comments that he wished certain people would crash and kill themselves. Eventually (and for reasons that I won't full disclose here), it became necessary to ask Tad to leave the US Hawks forum, and he is currently the only person who's been completely banned from the US Hawks.

Having said all of that, I have to add that Tad has an incredible amount of energy, and I think it would be great if the sport of hang gliding could figure out how to harness it. He's done extensive work on towing releases and he has a library of photographs related to releases. I think he brings an important perspective to the sport, but his personality is so toxic that it's very difficult to gain any benefit from it. Indeed, I consider it a failing on my part that I wasn't able to help Tad get past some of his "personality" issues and become a good contributing member on the US Hawks forum.
Fuck you, Bob.
Orion Price - 2013/03/14 02:30:05 UTC

Some times, in life, you get left with the short end of the stick. And sometimes, in Tad Earecson's case, holding an empty sack. Literally. The man has no testicles.
Now ya wanna pipe in and explain to all of us weekend warrior muppets how yet another one of your "professional pilot" buddies left another smoking hole in a runway? Your options seem to be pretty much restricted to:
- Mark was a crappy pilot and couldn't:
-- fly worth shit
-- manage to maintain and preflight his plane
- Bobby Fucking-Genius Bailey can't design planes any better than he can design hang glider tow systems
- Total mystery. No way of knowing what happened. I don't wanna hafta remind you muppets that speculation is not permitted.

Take your time. Any way you lose. And if you keep your nose stuck up Bobby's ass it's almost a certainty that another one of you Dragonfly dickheads is gonna buy it for the same reason down the road a bit.
Post Reply