Weak links

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Bill Cummings - 2011/08/28 23:18:41 UTC

Releases and weak-links

Concerning weak-links and releases in the discussions of late it occurs to me that pilots are stuck in a paradigm when really each towing style or format whether it be: AT, PL, or ST require different considerations when it comes to weak-link strength. The weak-link strength also depends on the varying equipment being used for these different styles of towing.

My wife and I along with my towing friend, Don Ray, froze every release that came down the pike when snow machine towing on the frozen lakes of Minnesota.
So when was the last time you:
- had a release freeze up?
- heard about anybody:
-- having a release freeze up?
-- besides you, Terry, and Don having a release freeze up?
Three ring, two ring, three string, two string, link-knife, Johnson in line, Switzer, and I'll have to ask Don what some of the other releases were named that we tried and proved inadequate for that environment.
So the Linknife - the greatest invention in the history of hang glider towing and possibly in the field of outer space exploration - which Peter insists on installing only at bridle apexes because he's incapable of designing a safe two point system that releases from a bridle end can be disabled by a bit of dry grass when there's nothing partially frozen on the surface and something partially frozen when there is. Super!
We would get a little bit of slushy snow on or in the works of any release and at altitude they would freeze and fail to release.
Would they freeze in the kill zone between zero and two hundred feet?
I viewed pictures of Tad's bench testing machine (for the lack of me coming up with a better word for it.) but no where did I see or read where Tad packed a barrel release with slushy snow stuck it in the freezer and bench test how many lbs. of pull it would take to overcome the ice and then release.
That's because I only deal with actual problems that actual people encounter in the real world. And in the real world people tend to be taking off from truck and boat tow platforms and launch dollies. And you find me a video of somebody taking off with a release that's coming into contact with slush.
While no one was bench testing frozen releases at Wallaby and Quest we were field testing releases during the Minnesota winter.
Nobody bench tests ANY releases...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/skysailingtowing/message/4049
Towing errata
Bill Bryden - 2004/04/01 16:20:18 UTC

Some aerotow releases, including a few models from prominent schools, have had problems releasing under high tensions. You must VERIFY through tests that a release will work for the tensions that could possibly be encountered. You better figure at least three hundred pounds to be modestly confident.

Maybe eight to ten years ago I got several comments from people saying a popular aerotow release (with a bicycle type brake lever) would fail to release at higher tensions. I called and talked to the producer sharing the people's experiences and concerns. I inquired to what tension their releases were tested but he refused to say, just aggressively stated they never had any problems with their releases, they were fine, goodbye, click. Another person tested one and found it started getting really hard to actuate in the range of only eighty to a hundred pounds as I vaguely recall. I noticed they did modify their design but I don't know if they ever really did any engineering tests on it. You should test the release yourself or have someone you trust do it. There is only one aerotow release manufacturer whose product I'd have reasonable confidence in without verifying it myself, the Wallaby release is not it.
...at Wallaby and Quest. And when they fail in the air...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3107
I have a tandem rating!!!
Lauren Tjaden - 2008/03/23 22:20:15 UTC

When Jim got me locked out to the right, I couldn't keep the pitch of the glider with one hand for more than a second (the pressure was a zillion pounds, more or less), but the F'ing release slid around when I tried to hit it. The barrel release wouldn't work because we had too much pressure on it.

Anyhow, the tandem can indeed perform big wingovers, as I demonstrated when I finally got separated from the tug.
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3391
More on Zapata and weak link
Paul Tjaden - 2008/07/22 04:32:22 UTC

I have never had a lockout situation happen so quickly and dramatically and had no chance to release as I have always thought I could do.
...they keep right on selling them and putting them up and running their fucking mouths about how they've been perfecting aerotowing for twenty years.
We never came across any reliable winter release. (But one---)

It would seem quite apparent that not being able to release we all must have eventually over flown the towline, locked out, and died many times over right?

If we had had a 2 "G" weak-link we would have certainly died.

Why?

The back of the snow machine would have lifted up enough to lose traction and eventually the pilot would enter a lock-out. (The driver releasing two thousand feet of line would not be the answer either since it's too much drag. )

Next it would be time for letting go of the bar and trying the big mitten and hook knife fiasco ---you would think --- but we skipped over that step.

We all lived because there was only one reliable release that NEVER failed us and allowed us to keep both hand on the bar and never relinquish control.

What was the name of this release?

It was called: WEAK-LINK!With the radio, on constant TX, the pilot would tell the snow machine driver to, "Break my weak-link."

If the radio would fail the driver would have stopped short of the shoreline for the pilot to release. If the pilot didn't release the driver would take off again and go wide open on the throttle and break the weak-link.
- If you had locked out VIOLENTLY enough and LOW enough you'd have died no matter what you were using for a release and weak link. Free flyers run off slopes, ramps, cliffs without any strings on them at any time and get locked out and slam back into the mountain. So don't tell me that a weak link is necessarily gonna do you any good.

- If you use your idiot, "Floor it, Don!" release you're gonna die a lot worse in a nonrecoverable situation and you're gonna turn a lot of recoverable situations into nonrecoverable situations.

- The proper response to a stalling/stalled glider is to floor it. The proper response to a locking/locked out glider is NEVER to floor it. It's ALWAYS to reduce or eliminate tension and, if possible, move in front of the glider. A system in with you eliminate tension by maximizing tension is certifiable insane - even if you can get away with it a bunch of times at altitude in smooth air.

- I fly at 320 pounds. So with a one G weak link and me flying straight up from the snowmobile I can't pull the back end of it up enough to cause it to lose traction? And I guess tandems are totally shit outta luck, right? (Not that that would bother me a great deal.)

- The driver releasing two thousand feet of line would not be the answer either since it's too much drag to WHAT? Allow the glider to remain airborne and circle to lay down loops of towline. BULLSHIT.

- How's that system of yours work for people - particularly new people - who make mistakes? 'Cause a lot of serious/fatal tow lockout crashes involve people who've made mistakes...

Bob Buxton accident
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2oeb0nNIKs
Scott Buxton - 2013/02/10
dead
http://www.kitestrings.org/post5902.html#p5902
016-04308
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3799/13746342624_c9b015f814_o.png
Image
Image
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2809/13746340634_a74b33d285_o.png
022-04610

...and can't afford to let go of the basetube. "Hey chuck! I routed the bridle over the basetube, I can't afford to let go and make the easy reach for my release lanyard. How 'bout locking up the winch and flooring it?"

- Got a plan for locking out low with a frozen release and a radio problem?
When the rope went tight the pilot would push out four inches, the 0.8 "G" (224 LBS for my all up weight of 280 lbs.) weaklink would let go.
Really hard to imagine being in a situation on a hang glider in which there could be a downside to pushing out four inches - especially in the course of a tow emergency.
The pilot would pull in 8 inches and fly on. Never even coming close to entering a hammerhead stall or ever being concerned with a uncompleted loop or tumble. Just simply fly on.
Well that's just great, Bill. Since you half a half a dozen assholes doing your snowmobile towing on frozen Minnesota lakes never even came close to entering a hammerhead stall or ever being concerned with a uncompleted loop or tumble - just simply flew on - that most certainly means that such a situation is impossible under any imaginable circumstances.
I would never use a 0.8 G weak-link for Aero-tow.
You would if you were slightly under my flying weight and had Davis as meet head or Rooney as a driver. If you were my flying weight or up you'd have flown under that.
That is too light.
BULLSHIT. The FAA, USHGA, Donnell Hewett, and the excellent book, Towing Aloft, by Dennis Pagen and Bill Bryden say it's OK.
With the threaded three point bridle...
It's a fuckin' TWO point bridle, Bill. 'Specially in the context in which you're talking. It connects at the secondary bridle apex and the keel.
...that may not unthread for various reasons...
Name some reasons, Bill. Name some reasons that can't be eliminated, mitigated, dealt with.
...I don't want to "get the line" that low.
Why on earth not?

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
weak links
Jim Rooney - 2007/08/01 13:47:23 UTC

Whatever's going on back there, I can fix it by giving you the rope.
It fixes whatever's going on back there. So why would anyone not want whatever's going on back there fixed?
I want to get away from the ground...
You want to GET AWAY FROM the ground!? Sounds a lot like...
Jim Rooney - 2007/08/01 19:49:30 UTC

It's more of this crappy argument that being on tow is somehow safer than being off tow.
...more of this crappy argument that being on tow is somehow safer than being off tow.
...and then have time to get rid of the line or wrap it all up and shove it into my harness.
I would not want a weak-link to blow unexpectedly near the ground just off the dolly.
Why not? A weak link blow is never anything more than an inconvenience and it always increases the safety of the towing operation. How would you know that you weren't about to lock out?
More trouble can happen with this launching style, blowing a weak-link, than when platform towing.
It's not a problem. It's only a problem when somebody misuses one of Tad's releases...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1079
$15 pacifiers
Jim Rooney - 2005/09/22 14:05:50 UTC

Ok, as long as we're digging this deeply into it....

It is not merely a matter of inconvenience. I was there, and in my oppinion Steve came rather close to breaking his legs. I was getting ready to dial 911.

Sure, being on tow at the wrong time is an extremely bad thing. But don't tell us that being off tow at the wrong time is all sweet and wonderful. Yes, we prepare for it, but that doesn't make it a safe situation. It makes it a manageable situation. There are times where it's better to be on tow than off tow. Ask anyone that's dragged a dolly into the air.
...and comes rather close to breaking his legs. And even then it's not really a dangerous situation - it's still manageable.
Staying on the launch dolly longer and getting more speed before lift off makes me more comfortable.
Well yeah. But if you're taking off behind a 914 Dragonfly you can get going a lot faster than it is. You're taking to the air at...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/09/02 19:41:27 UTC

Why is the devil always in the fine print, and incidentally in the things people *don't* say.

Yes, go read that incident report.
Please note that the weaklink *saved* her ass. She still piled into the earth despite the weaklink helping her... for the same reason it had to help... lack of towing ability. She sat on the cart, like so many people insist on doing, and took to the air at Mach 5.
That never goes well.
Yet people insist on doing it.
...Mach 5 and likely to get your ass *saved* by the weak link and piled into the earth.
But just like Jim Rooney says you could push out and break it.
And Ryan Voight says...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14230
pro tow set-up
Ryan Voight - 2009/11/03 05:24:31 UTC

It works best in a lockout situation... if you're banked away from the tug and have the bar back by your belly button... let it out. Glider will pitch up, break weaklink, and you fly away.

During a "normal" tow you could always turn away from the tug and push out to break the weaklink... but why would you?

Have you never pondered what you would do in a situation where you CAN'T LET GO to release? I'd purposefully break the weaklink, as described above. Instant hands free release Image
...EXACTLY THE SAME THING. Really hard to go wrong with either of those guys.
Way short of putting the tug in danger.
Obviously. There's no fuckin' way a tug can ever be in danger taking off...

Image

...with a couple hundred extra pounds pulling on the end of its tail in any direction. Nope, just as long as it's pulling a solo glider with a single loop of 130 pound Greenspot on a bridle end or a tandem with a double loop of 130 pound Greenspot on a bridle end it's perfectly safe. But obviously nothing greater than either of those two figures. Anything else just wouldn't have the requisite track record.

The only REAL threat to a tug...

http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief.aspx?ev_id=20121107X15820
CEN13LA055
On November 4, 2012, about 1245 eastern standard time, a Dragonfly-C, N667DF, experienced a total loss of engine power during takeoff, and collided with terrain near Darbyville, Ohio.
...is a total loss of engine power during takeoff. That's pretty easy to remember 'cause it's exactly the same thing that keeps hang gliders safe on takeoff.
I'm with Jim on this.
You're with Jim on all kinds of shit, Bill. Me... If that motherfucker told me it was raining during a downpour I'd stand out in it for twenty minutes before beginning to attach some credence to what he was saying.
Off of a platform I really don't care if it breaks at any time.
Yeah. Obviously this guy:

Image

doesn't either - despite what happened to one of his buddies at that competition when he was popped off tow when his nose got blasted up by a dust devil and popped off when his wrist lanyard was auto tensioned.
I launch with enough speed to fly away from the truck even without a towline.
In any imaginable set of circumstances.
There will be ample landing area to each side of the runway or I won't fly.
Hell, if you come down at the angle Eric Aasletten did you really don't need a whole lot of runway length in which to get the glider stopped.
I'm more with Jim on this issue than with Tad. But each fellow here has made statements that are all inclusive that really are not:
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 02:44:10 UTC

Where this discrepancy comes from is truck towing.
See, in truck towing, a weaklink does next to nothing for you (unless the line snags).
This is because you're on a pressure regulated system... so the forces never get high enough to break the link.
This may always hold true with light weight, aluminum LD, Tow me up, or ATOL type winches (reels) but my boat winch was made by Sky Dog Bob in Canada. It was a big, heavy, all steel, winch and took a good deal of inertia to get it rolling or even accelerate to a higher payout RPM.
Even with all the stretch of the three thousand six hundred feet of 3/16 inch Poly-Pro., rope I could push out and break my three hundred lb weak-link and fly away. That size weak-link would blow before the heavy drum could get up to speed and keep from breaking the weak-link. (Reliable inertia saving the day.)
I just love your optimism and can do attitude, Bill.
Tad wants to drive a steak through the heart of the idea of breaking a weak-link as a back up release. Hopefully he won't be successful.
I really hope I won't be successful until somebody like Rooney, Davis, Trisa, Paulen, Adam gets it the same way Zack Marzec got it.
I think weak-links are the only important part that we disagree on. All the other things I'm sure we could hash out, fine tune and come to an agreement.
Sorry Bill. That one's a total deal breaker until THIS:
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson.
stops being true.
I don't want to fly on LD winches mounted on the front bumper since the driver can not increase my tension from the cab. That is important to me. If I have a release failure or capture while platform towing I want to be able to command, "Break my weak-link," and for it to be possible not just feed me more line.
What are you gonna command if you're in a low level lockout and you have a release failure or capture? Tell my family I love them?

If you spent a tenth of the time you do writing crap like this working on a good both hands on the basetube platform release you could stop writing crap like this and other people could stop reading and debunking it.
On winches with too much rope on them there is always too much line dig going on and I use a 350 lb weak-link (1.25 G.) and still never enter a hammer head stall or start a loop when it fails.
So why do you think Zack Marzec tumbled twice from 150 feet with a 260 pound weak link that put him at one G? Maybe he panicked and pushed out all the way when he should've been pulling in?
I go to a field where the hydraulic stationary winch will not break a 160 lb weak-link for five flights in a row. It climbs out fine.
And they don't have any gusts, thermals, dust devil that could ruin your day in the event of the instantaneous removal of 160 pounds of thrust. How nice. Can anybody fly there or are you trying to keep it a safe place for people of varying ages to visit?
I have stood in a boat and hand over hand pulled slack into the boat with the pilot at a forty five angle to the boat and not climbing. I would guess it takes less than 40 lbs to do that.
I've kited my hang glider on the ocean beach with my 125 lb wife holding the end of the tow line. (I drug her when I pushed out.)

If you could only develop 70 lbs of line tension for a 280 lb (all up) weight it would work fine.
Yeah Bill, 0.25 Gs. Everything works just fine...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=11497
Aerotow release options?
Helen McKerral - 2009/06/29 06:32:32 UTC

Of the two thousand plus flights I've had, less than ten percent are footlaunch ground tow, but they account for fifty percent of the six times I've genuinely thought I was going to die or be seriously injured in this sport, and was literally inches away from doing so. Of the three towing instances, two were not my fault, one was. All three involved hurtling at extremely high groundspeeds very low to the ground with insufficient airspeed to climb, where "STOP STOP STOP" would have seen me plough in headfirst.

The three times I narrowly avoided injury when car towing were purely through luck, not skill (stopping was not an option - I could only screech, MORE TENSION MORE TENSION MORE TENSION and hope the vehicle had enough oomph to get me up).
...when everything's going just fine.
Of course if your runway is short you will end up with beefy weak-links and climbing fast.
The purpose of the fucking weak link...
Tost Flugzeuggerätebau

Weak links protect your aircraft against overloading.
...is to protect your aircraft against overloading - NOT to serve as the most effective possible backup/emergency release by dumbing it down as close as possible to "NORMAL" tow tension.
All this 2 G talk, (560 lbs weak-link for me), would have eliminated a very important use that I have in my bag of proven (Time after time,) survival tricks.
Repeatedly getting away with stupid shit isn't PROOF of ANYTHING. A hundred thousand launches hooked in launches off of the Lockout Mountain ramp doesn't prove that a hang check at the back of the ramp is a safe way to ensure that you're connected to your glider when you start your run. One unhooked launch at Mont Mont Saint Pierre proves it isn't.
Anyone that uses a two point bridle for static towing and has a 560 lb weak-link absolutely has to put the bridle and weak-link between two cars and break the weak-link and watch what happens to the ring at the towline.
Damn near nothing if the materials are Spectra. If they're polypro... Who gives a fuck?
I disagree with the next quote:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/skysailingtowing/message/4633
Weaklinks and aerotowing (ONLY)
Steve Kroop - 2005/02/10 04:50:59 UTC

Weak links are there to protect the equipment not the glider pilot. Anyone who believes otherwise is setting them selves up for disaster.
That's OK. That asshole doesn't agree with it either. Here's some more of that post.
Davis,

Your weak link comments are dead on. I have been reading the weak link discussion in the Oz Report with quiet amusement. Quiet, because weak links seem to be one of those hot button issues that brings out the argumentative nature of HG pilots and also invokes the "not designed here" mentality and I really did not want to get drawn into a debate. Amusement, because I find it odd that there was so much ink devoted to reinventing the wheel. Collectively I would say that there have been well over a 100,000 tows in the various US flight parks using the same strength weak link with tens of thousands of these tows being in competition. Yes I know some of these have been with strong links but only the best of the best aerotow pilots are doing this.
Anybody who's using a loop of 130 pound Greenspot for all one and two point solo gliders most assuredly isn't using it to protect any equipment - especially when virtually when all the equipment damage is occurring when totally under control gliders...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTKIAvqd7GI


...are getting dumped back on the runway for no reason.

And anybody who says that "only the best of the best aerotow pilots" are using "stronglinks" is very obviously using 130 pound fishing line as the focal point of his safe towing system to protect "pilots" who don't have any aerotowing skills and are equipped with the piece o' shit "releases" they sell at Quest.

So when Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney says:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 04:55:25 UTC

I mean seriously... ridgerodent's going to inform me as to what Kroop has to say on this? Seriously? Steve's a good friend of mine. I've worked at Quest with him. We've had this discussion ... IN PERSON. And many other ones that get misunderstood by the general public. It's laughable.
he's actually telling the truth. Steve totally believes that the sole purpose of the weak link is to protect the pilot and is totally lying to the general public. The only reason he said that was to show everybody what a...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=35401
Sport Class
Matt Christensen - 2013/12/27 14:23:01 UTC

As a side note, how cool is Steve Kroop?! This guy is such a great supporter of this amazing sport. We are truly lucky to have people like him in the US hang gliding community.
...super cool dude he is. Much too cool to get involved with any of us weekend warrior muppets engaged in these discussions and stop watching us in quiet amusement - especially right after one of his best of the best aerotow pilot buddies has just been splattered by the wheel he and his super cool buddies invented.
Too strong of a weak-link will launch the ring on a two point (1 to1 or 2 to 1) bridle...
The one you referred to as a three pointer earlier in this post?
...at the pilot when it breaks. Anyone who believes otherwise is setting them selves up for disaster.
A weak link - undoubtedly no more than one G - that blew on an under control / climbing normally solo glider Mike Robertson was boat towing on a polypro line was launched back into his face and took out one of his eyes. But we certainly wouldn't wanna go high enough to allow the glider to climb out normally 'cause a weak link that strong could launch the tow ring with enough power to do some REAL damage.

Some THOUGHTS, Bill. Don't use:
- elastic materials in tow configuration
- shit that breaks in the course of normal range tow operation
If my release fails and I can't safely break my weak-link and fly on, I'm headed for disaster.----Anyone who believes otherwise is setting himself up for disaster.
- If your release fails or is inaccessible in a critical situation it won't matter whether your, or your tug's, weak link breaks or doesn't - you're fucked. Rob Richardson, Mike Haas, Robin Strid, Steve Elliot, Roy Messing, Lois Preston have all died proving it, a whole shitload of other people have gotten beat up but good proving it, and probably thousands of people...

27-41810
Image
32-42004
Image
06-01602
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3826/11414264713_1fa67f5689_o.png
Image
40-05322
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2822/11414135356_a7c2e0ee74_o.png
Image
47-05508
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7353/11414310093_ddeecbcbfa_o.png
Image

...have proven it at altitude - or at least enough altitude...

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9Ek9_lFeSII/UZ4KuB0MUSI/AAAAAAAAGyU/eWfhGo4QeqY/s1024/GOPR5278.JPG
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3725/9665623251_612b921d70_o.png
Image
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Xh_NfnOcUns/UZ4Lm0HvXnI/AAAAAAAAGyk/0PlgrHfc__M/s1024/GOPR5279.JPG

...to be able to get away with it.

And if you're enough of an asshole to be flying a release in which you have something less than one hundred and ten percent confidence and flying around with a piece of fishing line because you think you're gonna be able to break it or it might break at just the right time to keep you from piling in while totally ignoring the real prices untold tons of morons before you have paid then you deserve anything and everything that can happen to you as a consequence.

- So - correct me if I'm wrong here, Bill - you're saying that you've got pretty much zero confidence in the reliability of your release to keep you alive and total confidence in your Hewett Link, right? And you, Terry, and Don have proven that beyond any doubt towing on frozen lakes in Minnesota, right?

So as long as you're towing fixed line - static, aero - or using a winch you can lock up then what's the point of even flying with a release? Sounds to me like releases are just expensive draggy junk that encourage people to take their hands off the basetube when they most need to have them on.

Remember when Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney had his panties in a bunch about homemade experimental equipment?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22308
Better mouse trap(release)?
Jim Rooney - 2010/12/16 18:47:05 UTC

Oh, I've heard the "everything we do is an experiment" line before.
The trouble is, it's not.

I've seen experimentation with towing gear more than anything else in HG.
I've not seen many go out and try to build their own sails for example. When someone does, they're very quickly "shown the light" by the community. Example... the guy that was building the PVC glider in California somewhere.
But for some reason, towing gear is exempt from this.

The difference is what we do has been done by thousands of people already. It's been tested... a lot.
What we do is free of the experimentation part.
It's still dangerous, but not at the level of building new gear is. Not even close.

That's what people fail to realize.
It's no small difference. It's a huge chasm.

Notice how I'm not saying to not do it.
Go forth and experiment. That's great... that's how we improve things.
I'm just warning you of that chasm.

A few years ago, I started refusing to tow people with home made gear.
I like the idea of improving gear, but the lack of appreciation for the world they were stepping into didn't sit with me.
For example... flying with the new gear in mid day conditions?
Are you kidding me????

Approach it for what it is... completely untested and very experimental gear which will likely fail in new and unforseen ways as it tries it's damndest to kill you... and then we can talk.
Well, there are only two ways a release can fail.

- It can blow prematurely / uncommanded / at random / at the worst possible time, when the glider is climbing hard in a near stall situation but that always increases the safety of the towing operation - just like 130 pound Greenspot does. Such a failure results in inconvenience at worst and even if the inconvenience is a tailslide, whipstall, and tumble you'll be OK as long as you use a helmet with a chinguard.

- It can be inaccessible or jam shut - like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJGUJO5BjnA


http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=16384
Tow Release Malfunction
Jim Rooney - 2010/03/26 20:54:43 UTC

Bent pin releases are indeed very very reliable. But 100%? Nope. It's exceptionally rare, but they jam. All mechanical things do.
very very reliable bent pin release. But that's inevitable because all mechanical devices jam at some time or another. And a loop of 130 pound fishing line isn't a mechanical device. Just can't be beat in the realm of aeronautical engineering.

So if we're all flying with Hewett Links what's the problem with us weekend warrior muppets taking our completely untested and very experimental funky shit up to compare the ways it fails to the ways the proven stuff fails?
---
2022/06/14 03:00:00 UTC

Todd's "release" didn't jam. He just made minimal effort to pull it so's he'd have an excuse to chop up his "equipment" with his razor sharp cutting tool.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Deltaman - 2013/02/08 13:57:01 UTC

Its purpose is not to protect the pilot as every ranches are saying but just to protect the glider from overload.
Davis Straub - 2013/02/08 16:57:42 UTC

All the flight parks that I am aware of are quite aware of this.
What flight parks are you aware of?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Bart Weghorst - 2011/08/28 20:29:27 UTC

Now I don't give a shit about breaking strength anymore. I really don't care what the numbers are. I just want my weaklink to break every once in a while.
Why does Cowboy Up just want its weak links to break every once in a while?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNXZwfR-MyY
Tina Jorgensen - 2013/11/09-10 UTC

Yeah, you were just... Might have been locked out a little bit.
How close to having its wings torn off was Dave's glider when its Davis Link kicked in?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/07 06:40:02 UTC

Your glider will tear the rope apart before it breaks.
It will tear the towmast off the tug before it breaks.
Your glider is capable of amazing feats of strength... it is in no danger of folding up on you.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/13 19:09:33 UTC

It was already worked out by the time I arrived.
The reason it sticks?
Trail and error.
Is that how things were worked out by the time Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney arrived? A little lighter than 130 wasn't strong and reliable enough to avoid frequent breaks from turbulence...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Davis Straub - 2013/02/09 16:45:39 UTC

I am more than happy to have a stronger weaklink and often fly with the string used for weaklinks used at Wallaby Ranch for tandem flights (orange string - 200 lbs). We used these with Russell Brown's (tug owner and pilot) approval at Zapata after we kept breaking weaklink in light conditions in morning flights.
...and a little heavier and...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 02:44:10 UTC

The forces of an aerotow can get high enough to tear the wings off the glider.
This is no exaggeration... it can be done.
...gliders were getting their wings torn off?

Can you cite me a single incident from the entire history of hang glider towing - stationary winch, surface static, payout, aero - in which a DHV/HGMA certified glider folded up or was the slightest bit permanently deformed on tow? Any weak link or lack thereof?

Sounds a lot to me like hang glider weak links are being used as protection against a totally nonexistent problem. (Yeah, we need them to keep the releases from getting overloaded but I know you sleazy bent pin junk merchants and pro toad assholes who fly with a "release" on one shoulder and THE weak link on the other really don't want that issue discussed too much.)
They tell their pilots that the point of the weak link is save the glider from overload...
Absolute and total BULLSHIT.

- Anyone who's an actual PILOT doesn't need to be told what the "POINT" of the weak link is.

- What do they tell their "PILOTS" the "POINT" of the RELEASE is? Seems to be a lot of confusion on this one.

- What do they tell their pilots the point...

1504
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2831/9623912388_98cf582742_o.png
Image

...of the spreader is? To keep the carabiner from being crushed?

- From the entire history of aerotowing only this asshole:

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26870
weak links
Steve Seibel - 2012/08/18 16:22:36 UTC

Based on my cumulative experience so far I would opt for a SLIGHTLY weaker weak link (those loads got alarmingly high!).
...has ever worried about his glider being stressed by a Davis Link on a two point delivering 226 pounds towline. And since Steve has never once in his entire hang gliding (and sailplaning) career(s) ever done or attempted to do anything of any practical value I one hundred percent guarantee you that that he's not flying with 120 pound test fishing line. He's still flying with his inaccessible piece of shit Wallaby "release" (can't even be bothered to switch to one of Joe's - http://www.getoffrelease.com/) and using his Davis Link as lockout protection.

- So that's why you...

http://ozreport.com/12.081
Weaklinks - the HGFA rules
Davis Straub - 2008/04/22 14:47:00 UTC
Pilots must use weaklinks provided by the meet organizers and in a manner approved by the meet organizers. All weaklinks will be checked and use of inappropriate weaklinks will require the pilot to go to the end of the launch line to change the weaklink.

Weaklinks will consist of a single loop of Cortland 130 lb Greenspot braided Dacron Tolling line and should be placed at one end of a shoulder bridle.
...mandated Davis Links for all competition gliders? 'Cause if you went up from that you'd start having wings torn off gliders?
...and that they should not rely on the weaklink to save them.
Then how come 99.9 percent of their "students" believe the sole purpose of the weak link is to save them and are totally incapable of grasping the concept of using a properly engineered release to save them?
Deltaman - 2013/02/08 18:24:58 UTC

For example, here, from Wallaby Ranch in WEAKLINK FAILURES:

http://www.wallaby.com/aerotow_primer.php
In an excessive out-of position situation, the weak link will snap before the control authority of the glider would be lost.
that's wrong.
Davis Straub - 2013/02/08 20:32:45 UTC

You'll have to ask Malcolm to update his document.
- Oh. Antoine will have to ASK Malcolm to update his document. That's Antoine's job.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21377
AT several Questions
Bart Weghorst - 2011/04/03 14:28:18 UTC

Deltaman,
Have you visited (one of) the Florida flight parks?
If not, it might be very worthwhile for someone who's aerotowing hang gliders in a business.
B.T.W I think you have a great location and I hope you get very successful in your venture.
Davis Straub - 2011/04/05 14:00:25 UTC

The flight park procedures here at Quest Air are the result of years of evolutionary pressures and experience that provide the focus on safety. The practices here illustrate what is important.

The construction of the carts (materials, wheel rake, tightness of the axles, etc.)
The length of the tow lines.
The appropriate carabineer.
The launch procedures (signals).
The maintenance of the 914 tugs.
The weaklink strength and construction of the connection to the tug.
The glider angle in the carts.
About 22 months ago you stupid pigfuckers were telling Antoine he needed to head over to Florida to learn how to do things right. And now you're telling him he should hop on a plane to explain to Malcolm and...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24534
It's a wrap
Lauren Tjaden - 2011/08/01 02:01:06 UTC

For whomever asked about the function of a weak link, it is to release the glider and plane from each other when the tow forces become greater than desirable -- whether that is due to a lockout or a malfunction of equipment or whatever. This can save a glider, a tow pilot, or more often, a hang glider pilot who does not get off of tow when he or she gets too far out of whack.

I rarely break weak links -- in fact, I believe the last one was some two years ago, and I have never broken one on a tandem (probably because I am light and also because I change them whenever they show any signs of wear). They are a good thing to have, though!!
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=28290
Report about fatal accident at Quest Air Hang Gliding
Lauren Tjaden - 2013/02/07 23:56:42 UTC

I am posting the report my husband, Paul Tjaden, just wrote about Zach Marzec's death at Quest. It is a great tragedy to lose someone so young and vital. We are sick about it, and our hearts go out to his friends, family and loved ones.
...Lauren how they're doing things wrong.

- Oh. Antoine will have to ask Malcolm to UPDATE his document. So when he first published this absolute rot in the 1998/02 issue of the magazine it was perfectly valid information. But by fifteen years later when Zack Marzec got splattered about twenty-one and a half miles to the NNW at Quest Newtonian physics had changed and it was no longer true.
He knows better.
Oh. Do ya think?

So he's deliberately disseminating false information which has crashed, injured, killed people. So how come USHGA hasn't revoked his certifications?

No, wait...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Davis Straub - 2013/03/06 18:29:05 UTC

You know, after all this discussion I'm now convinced that it is a very good idea to treat the weaklink as a release, that that is exactly what we do when we have a weaklink on one side of a pro tow bridle. That that is exactly what has happened to me in a number of situations and that the whole business about a weaklink only for the glider not breaking isn't really the case nor a good idea for hang gliding.

I'm happy to have a relatively weak weaklink, and have never had a serious problem with the Greenspot 130, just an inconvenience now and then.
He was actually right - at least mostly - about this all along. Forget I mentioned it.
deltaman - 2011/04/05 14:06:20 UTC

Thanks,
so, now, I know I can stay in France Image
Sure wish I could.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=13545
tow accidents
Tad Eareckson - 2009/09/07 16:34:32 UTC

Premature releases, inadvertent or deliberate, can be deadly - as I believe was the case in this situation - but rarely are, which is why we can tolerate the insanely understrength weak links we do and usually just pay in time, money, airtime, and mild crashes as much as we do.
Tommy Thompson - 2009/09/07 17:54:34 UTC
Whitewater, Wisconsin

Again I have to disagree, the only way it is a problem is if the pilot is not trained on what to do when a weak link, release, or tow rope fails. Here in Whitewater it is part of the tandem training, and students don't solos until they demonstrates it to the instructor.
An instructor like this one:

25-23223
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3713/9655904048_89cce6423a_o.png
Image

from Currituck?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bRrpHNa68iY/UQ6Pv9gRZyI/AAAAAAAAjTg/Hc22bx5122Q/s2048/20943781_BG1.jpg
Image

Any ideas on what might have gone wrong on that one?

Stalls and tumbles can't be prevented in FREE flight but as long as you've been trained on what to do they're beyond the realm of possibility popping off a tow - regardless of anything the air happens to be doing.

If you're afraid of stalls and tumbles then tow as much as possible 'cause you it's pretty much impossible to stall on...

http://www.wallaby.com/aerotow_primer.php
Aerotow Primer for Experienced Pilots
Wallaby Ranch - 2013/12/17

The pilot fails to anticipate the tug's quick climb-out after launch, gets low, and then doesn't push out far enough to climb up. Remember: it is almost impossible to stall under aerotow. The induced thrust vector makes the glider trim at a higher attitude. It is OK to push way out; you will climb, not stall.
...or...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Davis Straub - 2013/03/06 18:29:05 UTC

I'm happy to have a relatively weak weaklink, and have never had a serious problem with the Greenspot 130, just an inconvenience now and then.
...coming off tow.

If you're afraid of somebody taking a bomb on board the plane then always take a bomb on board the plane 'cause the chances of a plane having TWO bombs on board are so close to zero that it's ridiculous.

So...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1LbRj-NN9U
Mitch Shipley

If you take this away that angle goes from there to now there and the... You're stalled. You're stalled.
How come THIS tandem aerotow instructor from Quest (who admires Jim Rooney because of his keen intellect) is teaching that a stall as a result of a Rooney Link pop with the glider totally under control in sled conditions is inevitable?
Jim Gaar - 2009/09/10 14:52:35 UTC

He's a TROLL folks!

Why does everyone try to make sense with this (insert your own word here)?
Tommy Thompson - 2009/09/10 15:35:21 UTC

James

You may be right, I'm sure you'v seen at least one of them argumentative students that seem to know more then the instructor in those cases it would be best to keep the student on the ground until they learn to follow instructions, in Tad's case it may be best to ignore him.
Fuck you, Tommy.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=35572
Forbes Flatlands, an aerotowing accident review
Andrew Vanis - 2014/01/10 04:10:25 UTC

Nothing worse than mushing off the cart - especially if the weak link breaks right after being airborne.

Wait there is something worse - being stuck on the cart because of the keel cradle is too high and then getting rocketed vertically off the cart once the airspeed is finally high enough for that low AOA to fly.
And...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TTTFlymail/message/11545
Cart stuck incidents
Keith Skiles - 2011/06/02 19:50:13 UTC

I witnessed the one at Lookout. It was pretty ugly. Low angle of attack, too much speed and flew off the cart like a rocket until the weak link broke, she stalled and it turned back towards the ground.
...having the weak link break.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=18777
Accident - Broken Jaw - Full Face HG Helmet
Keith Skiles - 2010/08/28 05:20:01 UTC

Last year, at LMFP I saw an incident in aerotow that resulted in a very significant impact with the ground on the chest and face. Resulted in a jaw broken in several places and IIRC some tears in the shoulder.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 17:34:33 UTC

Remember, a weak link improves safety.
Say it over and over and over in your head until it sinks in.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30636
interesting tug plane
Craig Hassan - 2014/01/14 17:58:50 UTC

There are a lot of ultralight/airplanes that "COULD" tow a hang glider.
But just one flavor of fishing line.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26870
weak links
Craig Hassan - 2012/08/16 13:15:57 UTC

My last weak link break was 2010 at the Mid West Comp. I've been using the same weak link since then.
So my suggestion is, don't break your weak link and it won't cause you any problems.
Right, Craig?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=821
Fatal hang gliding accident
Tad Eareckson - 2011/11/13 16:32:13 UTC

The "floating crossbar" was a scheme whereby people attempted to get something for nothing and it hit just a little before Donnell came out with his Skyting Bridle - believing that it would do the same thing. On Page 5 of the 1982/09 edition of his Skyting newsletter...
In addition to the above mentioned roll and yaw tendancies, there is some sideways force on the pilot due to the body line. This is illustrated below:

Image

As can be seen, this sideways force tends to pull the pilot over to the correct side to make the glider turn naturally in the proper direction.
Zack C - 2011/11/14 02:07:28 UTC

Wow. I can't believe he said that.
Bill Cummings - 2011/11/16 05:46:42 UTC

Bill C. reply (BCR): We should all be careful about the context for which the original quote was made.
The original quote was - and is - totally fucking clueless. It's backwards - the precise opposite of what happens in real life.
This will keep the intent from expanding credence to unrelated discussions and bolstering an argument that is having trouble standing on its own.

Example:
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson.
This quote has been put forward by Tad E. and parroted by others to add strength to the strong weaklink theory and was a bad choice in that effort.

Richard Johnson was my tow instructor (Jan 1978)
The type of towing he was referring to was: Pop starts off of the beach, tow rope special ordered from Japan (3/8," diameter, 2,025 lbs breaking strength), no weak-link, towing bridle hooked only to a stainless steel control frame, climb rates of over 1,000'/min., where a rope break or premature release would put you part way into a uncompleted loop.
On 2013/02/02 at Quest there was a "standard aerotow weak link" - 260 pounds towline, very close to the glider's flying weight - that popped and dumped the glider into a tailslide, whipstall, and tumble and killed the tandem aerotow instructor flying it. So what's your point?
(In and out of the water so no parachute.)
Zack Marzec was flying over dry land and had a parachute which did him no good whatsoever. If he'd been over water, preferably without a parachute, he'd have probably been OK - barring drowning.
Don't read any more into his statement than that. It has absolutely no correlation to any of the kind of towing that is being done now days.
Bullshit.
Richard was not a soothsayer looking into the future and seeing the coming of weaklinks, bridles made of anything less than one ton capacity, and coming off of a dolly behind an aero tug.

For we pilots that knew what Richard was talking about it actually sounds to me like, the clock has just struck 13. Which calls into question all previous information and casts serious doubt on any information to come. I see it as a quote that is misplaced which actually weakens an position. Green spot or two "G" weaklinks being right or wrong is not the point of this post. Only the possible misuse of quotes to back up a position is the point of this post.
You're babbling incoherently.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Bill Cummings - 2013/02/15 19:59:49 UTC

ZC, You're right! I'm wrong! Your mind is made up! Good luck with your strong weak links! LATERS! :D
Get fucked.
Bill Cummings - 2013/02/28 06:11:37 UTC

I looked at the video...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMsIkAOeJ0I
...ZC and what is not obvious is the type of bridle he was using.
I'm betting the pilot was not using a bridle to the keel release and that he couldn't hold the climb rate down while the truck was towing the pilot too fast.
The steeper the tow angle the less the advantage of a two point bridle.
What is obvious to me is that the pilot was using a very strong weaklink to be able to climb so fast with the keel more than 30 degrees to the horizon (even taking into consideration the tilted earth towing scenario).
Give that to us in Gs, Bill. 0.8 Gs. Minimum legal if the glider's fully loaded. Tell us maximum achievable climb rate and pitch attitude. And don't forget to factor in stuff like pilot input, gusts, thermals, dust devils, tension dips and spikes the way Donnell conveniently forgot when he was sketching his little vector diagrams.
When the pilot lost the towline it had the nose too high and due to that it climbed into a stall.
0:50
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR_4jKLqrus

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYe3YmdIQTM
My weaklinks would not allow me to climb that fast and develop into a stall like that.
BULLSHIT.
Summery: I believe the strong weaklink breaking caused the stall and loss of control.
Lemme read that back to ya, Bill:
I believe the strong weaklink breaking caused the stall and loss of control.
Yeah. The pilot had SOME control over the situation - despite his totally clueless driver and his misadjusted split towline jamming the bar out/up - and was FLYING and CLIMBING *UNTIL* the "strong" weak link broke.
Now if you are going to say that the pilot should have been using an even stronger weaklink to stay on the line after seeing that climb rate it will prove beyond any reasonable doubt that you are in fact a ------------wait for it-----
INTERNET TROLL.
Nah, let's not start letting the PILOT make and execute decisions. That's one can of worms we don't wanna open.

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1186
D. Straub's Politics=Gun Grabbing, Constitution/Baby Killing
Bill Cummings - 2013/02/19 02:43:00 UTC

No one should confuse me with someone that has been exposed to higher education. I avoided that style of incarceration like the plague. Image Image Image
Don't worry 'bout a thing, Bill. Nobody is. Unfortunately, the same is true of your buddy Donnell.
Donnell Hewett - 1980/12

Now I've heard the argument that "Weak links always break at the worst possible time, when the glider is climbing hard in a near stall situation," and that "More people have been injured because of a weak link than saved by one." Well, I for one have been saved by a weak link and would not even consider towing without one. I want to know without a doubt (1) when I am pushing too hard, and (2) what will break when I push too hard, and (3) that no other damage need result because I push too hard.

Furthermore, I will not use a mechanical weak link no matter how elaborate or expensive because there is always the possibility that it may fail to operate properly. In skyting we use a simple and inexpensive strand of nylon fishing line which breaks at the desired tension limit. There is no possible way for it to jam and fail to release when the maximum tension is exceeded. Sure, it may get weaker through aging or wear and break too soon, but it cannot get stronger and fail to break. If it does break too soon, so what? We simply replace it with a fresh one.

A properly designed weak link must be strong enough to permit a good rate of climb without breaking, and it must be weak enough to break before the glider gets out of control, stalls, or collapses. Since our glider flies level with a 50 pound pull, climbs at about 500 fpm with a 130 pound pull, and retains sufficient control to prevent stalling if a weak link breaks at 200 pounds pull, we selected that value. Of course, a pilot could deliberately produce a stalled break at 200 lbs, just as he can stall a glider in free flight. But if he is trying to limit his climb rate and the forces exceed the break limit, the glider simply drops its nose to the free flight attitude and continues flying. If the weak link breaks (or should the towline break) at less than the 200 pound value, the effect is even less dramatic and controlled flight is still present.
Donnell Hewett - 1982/09

ACCIDENT:
BEGINNER STALLS AND CRASHES

RULE 5. STOP THE VEHICLE INSTEAD OF TRIPPING THE SAFETY RELEASE. In the accident being discussed, the abrupt loss of towline tension was probably one of the main reasons the glider stalled. If the vehicle had slowed down without tripping the safety release, then the tension in the towline would have gradually decreased and the glider probably would not have stalled. But even if the beginner had kept pushing out and stalled the glider, the stall would have been less dramatic because of the presence of some tension in the towline. In fact, the ground crew can make a stalled glider gently descend toward the ground by driving the vehicle at the correct speed. This, of course, requires considerable driving skill, but it can be done.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMsIkAOeJ0I
Extreme Hang Glider Whip Stall

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMsIkAOeJ0I
Bill Cummings - 2013/03

76, Climb rate too fast.
Good thing you told him that. He probably thought it was just about right.
A climb restricting "V" bridle to the keel gives more pitch control to the pilot than a ProTow.
Rubbish.

http://www.ozreport.com/9.133
Lesson from an aerotow accident report
Steve Wendt - 2005/05/29

This time she couldn't find her v-bridle top line with her weak link installed for her priimary keel release. She chose to tow anyway, and just go from the shoulders, which to my knowledge she had never done before, nor had she been trained to understand potential problems. This could have been done with a short clinic and if we thought it a possibility, been done under supervised conditions in the evening air.
After a short clinic you can become a pro and have every bit of the pitch control you do two point.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22233
Looking for pro-tow release
Zack C - 2011/06/16 03:14:35 UTC

I've never aerotowed pilot-only, but it is my understanding that this configuration pulls the pilot forward significantly, limiting the amount he can pull in further.
Davis Straub - 2011/06/16 05:11:44 UTC

Incorrect understanding.
See? The opinion of stronglinking INTERNET TROLL like Zack versus the wisdom of a highly experienced, standard aerotow weak link mandating pro toad like Davis who understands that only consequence of light weak links pops is a bit of inconvenience every now and then.
Pilots, don't fall into the trap/lie about using strong weaklinks.
- PILOTS understand what a weak link is and isn't and don't need your counsel on the issue.

- What's a "strong weak link"? The FAA mandates a range of eighty to two hundred percent of max certified operating weight for hang glider aerotow. USHGA is and always has been perfectly capable of knocking off the top 83 percent of that range and keeping all gliders between 0.8 and 1.0 - which would be both legal and consistent with Skyting Theory. How come neither you nor anyone else has ever made a suggestion that we do that?

- What's the proof that those who advocate for the upper end of the range are liars?

- What motivates liars such as most of the denizens of the space under Tad's rock? Whenever they advocate for upper range weak links they get threatened, attacked, called Tad Clones and lose any opportunity they might have had of being towed by Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney.

- Name one victim of the trap/lie about using strong weak links. And make sure that we're not gonna be able to cite half a dozen examples of Rooney Linkers being killed just as dead or significantly more so.

- Cite one single other example of...

http://ozreport.com/12.081
Weaklinks - the HGFA rules
Davis Straub - 2008/04/22 14:47:00 UTC
Pilots must use weaklinks provided by the meet organizers and in a manner approved by the meet organizers. All weaklinks will be checked and use of inappropriate weaklinks will require the pilot to go to the end of the launch line to change the weaklink.

Weaklinks will consist of a single loop of Cortland 130 lb Greenspot braided Dacron Tolling line and should be placed at one end of a shoulder bridle.
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
weak links
Jim Rooney - 2007/07/22 22:30:28 UTC

I've heard it a million times before from comp pilots insisting on towing with even doubled up weaklinks (some want no weaklink). I tell them the same thing I'm telling you... suck it up. You're not the only one on the line. I didn't ask to be a test pilot. I can live with your inconvenience.
...a million of our most accomplished pilots needing to have something so clearly in the interest of their safety forced on them with the degree of belligerence that Davis and Rooney do. Any huge protests regarding mandatory certified gliders, helmets, parachutes, radios, sprog settings.

- From the entire history of aviation name a single other safety device which routinely kicks in when the flight is safe and totally under control and irrevocably overrides the decision of the Pilot In Command to continue the flight.

- Point me to some flame wars in sailplane discussion groups between safety advocates and stronglink liars and bitching about the problems of using manufacturer specified ratings.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14312
Tow Park accidents
Jim Rooney - 2009/11/10 17:19:54 UTC

Ah, back to civil discussion. Image

Something to note about leaving carts....
There is a drastic difference when being pulled by a 582 or a 914/912.

People have a tendency to leave the cart too soon when behind a 582. With the big tugs however, the problem is the opposite. This is especially obvious when you take someone that tows behind 582s and put them behind a 914.

It doesn't sound like a problem at first... more speed is good right? As with all things, yes but .... "to a point". See what happens behind a 914 if you use 582 technique is this....

You accelerate very rapidly of course and gain a lot of speed. I call it leaving the cart at Mach 5. No problem yet (well, there's a small one, but we'll get to that). As you leave the cart, the tug is already a good bit above you, so you ease off the bar pressure (you've got a ton at this point) and this is just about the same time you slam into the prop wash. Your weaklink lets go.

After a couple weaklink breaks in this manner, you start to wonder if Tad's right about these "weak" weaklinks. Nevermind that it's a technique problem not an equipment problem. Nevermind that using a stronglink greatly increases the chances that you will hurt yourself in a very bad way.
And...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Davis Straub - 2011/08/26 14:04:52 UTC

We had six weaklink breaks in a row at Zapata this year. Russell Brown (tug pilot, tug owner, Quest Air owner) said go ahead and double up (four strands of Cortland Greenspot).
...after half a dozen weak link breaks in a row in light morning conditions by competition pilots at the World Record Encampment and no suggestion whatsoever that there's a technique problem, Russell Brown (tug pilot, tug owner, Quest Air owner) starts caving to the position that Tad's right about these "weak" weak links and abruptly ups them 54 percent - skipping the usual trail and error period of quite literally hundreds of thousands of tows. And we, amazingly, see no evidence that the chances of someone being hurt in a very bad way have been greatly increased by the use of these stronglinks that...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/04 19:31:36 UTC

The accepted standards and practices changed.
I still won't tow people with doubled up weaklinks. You don't get to "make shit up". I don't "make shit up" for that matter either.
...you yourself still refuse to tow. So apparently...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 08:24:31 UTC

Thought I already answered that one... instead of quoting myself (have a look back if you don't believe me), I'll just reiterate it.

I don't advocate anything.
I use what we use at the flight parks. It's time tested and proven... and works a hell of a lot better than all the other bullshit I've seen out there.

130lb greenspot (greenspun?) cortland fishing line.
In stock at Quest, Highland, Eastern Shore, Kitty Hawk Kites, Florida Ridge, and I'm pretty sure Wallaby, Lookout and Morningside.
Not sure what Tracy up at Cloud Nine uses, but I'll put bets on the same.

Did I miss any?
Is it clear what I mean by "We"?
I didn't make the system up.
And I'm not so arrogant to think that my precious little ideas are going to magically revolutionise the industry.
There are far smarter people than me working this out.
I know, I've worked with them.
(Bobby's a fucking genius when it comes to this shit... for example.)
...we can eliminate Russell Brown (tug pilot, tug owner, Quest Air owner) from this mysterious list of yours of people far smarter than you who are working this out.

And the last known issue that the only identified member of your list of people far smarter than you - Bobby Bailey, who's a fucking genius when it comes to this shit - worked out was...

http://ozreport.com/12.081
Weaklinks - the HGFA rules
Davis Straub - 2008/04/22 14:47:00 UTC

At the 2008 Forbes Flatlands Greenspot for the first time was used as the standard weaklink material (thanks in large part to the efforts of Bobby Bailey). We applaud these efforts to improve the safety of aerotowing by using a better weaklink material.
...130 pound Greenspot as the standard aerotow weak link which Russell Brown (tug pilot, tug owner, Quest Air owner) found over the course of a six tow trail period with a one hundred percent error rate to be 65 percent of the strength needed in order for actual sustained aviation to be committed.

So c'mon, Jimmy. Who are some of the people far smarter than you working this out?

Russell outranks Dr. Trisa Tilletti...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/skysailingtowing/message/7067
AT SOPs - proposed revisions
Subj: Re: [Tow] AT SOPs - proposed revisions
Date: 2009/05/10 02:08:52 UTC
From: cloud9sa@aol.com
To: skysailingtowing@yahoogroups.com
cc: GreggLudwig@aol.com, lisa@lisatateglass.com

Hi Tad.

I'm Tracy Tillman, on the USHPA BOD, on the Tow Committe, and I am an Aviation Safety Counselor on the FAA Safety Team (FAAST) for the Detroit FSDO area. As a rep of both the USHPA and FAA, I would like to help you, USHPA, and the FAA improve safety in flying, towing, and hang gliding.

The FAA gets a lot of letters of complaint from a lot of yahoos. For best effect, I suggest that you describe in your letter (and also post to the skysailingtowing group and share with the USHPA Tow Committee) your areas of expertise (if any) related to this issue, and list your qualifiications, logged hours, and currency in certain categories, such as:

1. hang glider pilot rating and logged hours
2. hang glider aerotow rating, logged hours, and logged number of tows
3. hang glider tug pilot rating, logged hours towing, and logged number of tows
4. hang glider aerotow administrator appointment date
5. hang glider aerotow supervisor appointment date
6. hang glider tanderm instructor rating, logged hours of aerotow tandem instruction, and logged number of instructional flights
7. airplane pilot license ratings and logged number of hours
8. airplane tow pilot endorsement date, logged number of hours towing with airplane, logged number of tows
9. sailplane tow pilot license ratings, logged number of hours, logged number of tows.
10. sailplane instructor license date, logged number of hours of instruction, logged number of instructional tows
11. any other flying or engineering-related credentials that you may have as evidence of your competence to make these claims.

(BTW, if you have an AT hang glider rating or above the you would/should have received the USHPA Aerotow Guidelines as part of your instruction from the person who taught you to aerotow and/or gave you your AT rating, and you should currently have access to them via the packet that is accessible to you on the USHPA web site, if your AT or higher AT-related ratings and appointments are current.)

It would also be good for the FAA and USHPA to know what kind of ultalight or sport plane tug and airplane you use for towing hang gliders and sailplanes with at your operation (if any), along with a general description of your towing operation or who you provide towing and instructional services for (if any).

Additionally, if you want to really present a convincing argument, you should also: (a) get other experts to co-sign your letter, such as those who have some or most of the aerotowing-related credentials listed above, who have been doing this for many years with many students, and who support your argument; and (b) present reliable data based on valid research showing that there is a significant difference in safety with the changes that you recommend. Supportive comments from aerotow experts along with convincing data can make a difference. Otherwise, it may seem as if your perception of "the sky is falling" may not be shared by most others who have a wealth of experience and who are deeply involved in aerotowing in the US.

This information would also be very helpful in convicing the USHPA and others to take your complaint seriously. Most of the individuals who serve on the USHPA Towing Committe have most of the credentials listed above, so it will be great for you to let them know about your similar credentials and depth of experience, too. If you do not have those credentials, it will be a simple matter for the USHPA Tow Committee to respond to the FAA to discount your complaint, so it will be very important for you to present this information in your letter to the FAA and to others now.

The best way to make change is to get involved, and join the Tow Committee at its meetings. That's what people who really care do to make change. Such is the nature of the great opportunities we have to make a difference in the US (although it means having to spend time, money, and effort, compared to the ease of just sitting in front of a computer.)

Good luck with your endeavor, and regards,

Dr. Tracy Tillman
USHPA Director, Region 7
FAA Detroit FSDO FAAST Aviation Safety Counselor
whose got some pretty impressive credentials - as we can see in Trisa's Higher Education magazine article:
Dr. Trisa Tilletti - 2012/06

It's not that it doesn't happen, but it is a rare occurrence. Russell Brown, a founder of Quest Air in Florida and a well-known Dragonfly tug pilot, is also a sailplane pilot, tug pilot, and A&P mechanic for a large commercial sailplane towing operation in Florida. He told us that, like us, he has never seen a sailplane weak link break, either. Russell owned the first 914-powered Dragonfly ever made--he helped us build the second one, which we still fly. He is the one who, many years ago, showed us the method for making a WT weak link and suggested we use polypropylene rather than Spectra for hang glider V-bridles.
so Trisa's out.

Matt Taber?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/16 05:05:41 UTC

My general rule is "no funky shit". I don't like people reinventing the wheel and I don't like test pilots. Have I towed a few test pilots? Yup. Have I towed them in anything but very controlled conditions? Nope. It's a damn high bar. I've told more to piss off than I've told yes. I'll give you an example... I towed a guy with the early version of the new Lookout release. But the Tad-o-link? Nope.
Nope. He puts funky shit out on the market in which we already have proven systems that work and is just a moderate number of notches up from a convicted pedophile.

Malcolm?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Deltaman - 2013/02/08 18:24:58 UTC

For example, here, from Wallaby Ranch in WEAKLINK FAILURES: http://www.wallaby.com/aerotow_primer.php
In an excessive out-of position situation, the weak link will snap before the control authority of the glider would be lost.
Davis Straub - 2013/02/08 20:32:45 UTC

You'll have to ask Malcolm to update his document. He knows better.
Nope. Both Davis and you...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/07 06:40:02 UTC

Does it "prevent" lockouts... of course not.
...say he's full of shit on the issue of a Rooney Link being able to keep the glider from getting into too much trouble.

Davis?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27494
The exciting bits
Jim Rooney - 2012/05/28 11:49:58 UTC

Guys
Your questions hold the answers.

What you're writing about and what your seeing are two very different things.
Your theories are what are doing you in.

What you're talking about is coming out of the cart too early and not having enough flying speed.
What you're watching is Davis coming out of the cart at Mach5.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaVg_bzK3Aw


Nope. He breaks Rooney Links by coming out of the cart at Mach 5.

Steve Wendt?
Wills Wing / Blue Sky / Steve Wendt / Ryan Voight Productions - 2007/03

NEVER CUT THE POWER...

Image

Reduce Gradually
Increase Gradually
Nope. He's firmly convinced that cutting the power is a BAD thing and such a bad thing that one must never do it.

Pagen?
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

Release Test Procedures

Perhaps more than for any other single piece of equipment in the towing milieu arsenal, the reliability of releases is indispensable to safe towing. There have been many releases designed over the years and some are fine while others have inherent problems which lead to failures. We cannot readily point to any one type of release design which is inferior, but we can describe a test routine which, if followed, will reasonably assure that a release will work every time under all imaginable tow situations.
Nope. He thinks you can put bulletproof releases in the air based on bench test performance and says absolutely nothing about track record lengths. And he's also a proponent of...
Dennis Pagen - 2005/01

Analyzing my incident made me realize that had I released earlier I probably would have hit the ground at high speed at a steep angle. The result may have been similar to that of the pilot in Germany. The normal procedure for a tow pilot, when the hang glider gets too high, is to release in order to avoid the forces from the glider pulling the tug nose-down into a dangerous dive. This dangerous dive is what happened when Chris Bulger (U.S. team pilot) was towing John Pendry (former world champion) years ago. The release failed to operate in this case, and Chris was fatally injured. However Neal kept me on line until I had enough ground clearance, and I believe he saved me from injury by doing so. I gave him a heart-felt thank you.
...this crappy argument that being on tow is somehow safer than being off tow.

Hewett?
Donnell Hewett - 1984/10

The basic rule is 1 g, which means it should break at a tension equal to the combined weight of pilot, glider and flight instruments.
Nope. He thinks that weak link strength should be proportional to glider flying weight and is a staunch opponent of the trail and error approach.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/03 19:37:19 UTC

It saddens me to know that the rantings of the fanatic fringe mask the few people who are actually working on things.
Bobby, whose crowning achievement in the field of hang glider aerotowing has been the identification of 130 pound test fishing line as the one-size-fits-all focal point of a safe towing system is being abruptly superseded in many operations with 200 pound test material, is a fucking genius when it comes to this shit.

And apparently there's NO ONE either in his league or in second place. So can you present some argument that these people who are far smarter than you - despite your nearly universal reputation for having an extremely keen intellect and your statement that you have some precious little ideas - and are actually working things out without the slightest hints to the public about the problems they're trying to fix -actually exist?
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/03 19:37:19 UTC

See, most people are happy with how we do things. This isn't an issue for them. They just come out and fly. Thing's aren't perfect, but that's life... and life ain't perfect. You do what you can with what you've got and you move on.

But then there's a crowd that "knows better". To them, we're all morons that can't see "the truth".
(Holy god, the names I've been called.)

I have little time for these people.
I'm having a hard time resolving those to statements within the same post. If most people are happy with how YOU do things...
- What's the point of anybody "actually working on things?
- Why would it sadden you that the "fanatic fringe" is masking the efforts of the efforts of the few people who are actually working on things?
- Wouldn't the fanatic fringe be the ONLY group actually working on things?
- Why would the fanatic fringe wanna mask its own efforts?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Dr. Trisa Tilletti - 2012/06

What we have covered in this article is practical information and knowledge gleaned from the real world of aerotowing, developed over decades and hundreds of thousands of tows by experts in the field. This information has practical external validity. Hopefully, someone will develop methods and technology that work better than what we are using as standard practice today.
HOPEFULLY? SOMEONE?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 08:24:31 UTC

Did I miss any?
Is it clear what I mean by "We"?
I didn't make the system up.
And I'm not so arrogant to think that my precious little ideas are going to magically revolutionise the industry.
There are far smarter people than me working this out.
I know, I've worked with them.
(Bobby's a fucking genius when it comes to this shit... for example.)
We have industry people far smarter than Jim Rooney - internationally famous for his keen intellect - working things out RIGHT NOW! The problem is...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/03 19:37:19 UTC

It saddens me to know that the rantings of the fanatic fringe mask the few people who are actually working on things.
...that the rantings of the fanatic fringe are masking the few people who are actually working on things. And there are very few of these people, only Jim Rooney knows who they are, and they're very susceptible to being masked by rantings.
Like the methods and technology used today, it is unlikely that the new technology will be dictated onto us as a de jure standard. Rather, to become a de facto standard, that new technology will need to be made available in the marketplace, proven in the real world, and then embraced by our sport.
Are you sure you're not a pretty big part of the problem here, Trisa? These few people have been working their assess off, anonymously, for years, to solve serious problems nobody else even knows about, they're being masked by the rantings of the fanatic fringe, and you're putting out this message that even after they've succussfully worked things out:
- they'll have to make it available in a marketplace already flooded with the crap assholes like you spew out
- it'll have to be:
-- used for decades and hundreds of thousands of tows by experts in the field
-- proven in the real world
-- embraced by our sport

Do you have any idea how daunting and discouraging that must sound to these noble individuals? Where do you think we'd be now if the methods and technology that Wilbur and Orville developed were met with that much inertia? I'm guessing lighter than air and downwind only.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNCrD6Cnc48
hang glider crash
bisfal bisto - 2014/01/24
dead
019-0725
http://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3854/14367992265_7f220637c2_o.png
Image

, broken weak link. please let me know what I did wrong.
Where to fuckin' begin...

- Is there some reason you're starting that off with a comma and a space?

- Do you know:
-- where the shift key is, what it's for, how to use it?
-- what the:
--- weak link is, what it's for, what strength it's supposed to be?
--- suspension spreader is for, where your Wills Wing owner's manual tells you to position it?

- Did you do the preflight sidewire load test specified in your owner's manual? Just kidding.

- I like the way you have a full size steel carabiner backing up the connection between your harness suspension and parachute bridle. What are you using to backup your harness your harness suspension and parachute bridle?

- What equipment failure is more likely to get you seriously fucked up or killed: your five and three quarter ton carabiner or your 130 pound test fishing line?

- Do you know how many days it's been since the last person was killed at Quest by his 130 pound fishing line? (356 when you posted the video.)

- How:
-- much equipment damage do you think you'd have sustained if you'd elected to use your wheels to land on the Quest putting green?
-- good an idea do you think it is to get taught how to land a Wills Wing glider by a Wills Wing dealership that sells Wills Wing downtubes?

- Have you tried to blow that piece of shit Quest "release" with 130 pounds pulling on the spinnaker shackle as far out of alignment with how it was designed to be loaded as possible?

- What happens if you get locked out low, your Rooney Link doesn't break when it's supposed to, and you hafta let go of the basetube to get to the bicycle brake lever velcroed to your starboard downtube?

- How come you're asking people here? Didn't the top notch professionals at Quest who've been perfecting aerotowing for twenty years get you thoroughly tuned in?
Bill Cummings

Search Youtube for the video below for another trick to save your bacon when landing on either grass, class 5 gravel, or pea gravel. There are landing areas like those listed where a flare isn't needed at all.
NO FLARE LANDING, HANG GLIDING
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lKz7SWZCYg


Search YouTube for this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mc7MHO5mHoI


There's yet another trick to save your bacon when landing on grass, class five or pea gravel, any surface on which it's safe to land a hang glider after your Rooney Link increases the safety of the towing operation - whether you wanted it to or not.
Your right hand hit the flying wire from the tail to the right down tube.
Just like your parachute handle look then grab the down tube earlier than you did.
Niki didn't take her hand off the control bar while she was controlling her glider for the landing. So she didn't have that problem.
Next your left hand missed the left down tube twice.
Yeah...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaTu5Y4WBdY

18-3704
Image

That sorta thing happens a lot in this sport.
Look and grab earlier than you did. Your left hand was at or slightly above your flight deck on the left down tube. No way are you high enough on the down tubes for a flare.
Why the fuck does he NEED a goddam idiot flare?
Play it back again and see that your elbows are almost locked straight already. With your hands that wide, that low, on the down tubes you will only get the bar forward maybe two more inches.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2Gd2kcyOes

1-2717
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7094/13952342741_f71f343877_o.png
Image
Image
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7151/13952329131_03e535bc8b_o.png
6-4518
You have to try for at least midway up the down tubes for a flare. Does you harness fight you getting vertical? If so make some changes.
Shut up, Bill.
Bigger wheels helps.
THOSE wheels would've worked if he'd tried to use them. He could've deliberately bellied in with NO wheels and been OK ferchrisake.
Pull on more speed for final.
Level out with knees slightly bent with toes almost dragging.
Bleed off the speed by holding you're your same height above the grass by letting the control frame pull your hands forward.
When the control frame stops pulling your hands forward that is trim speed.
Once you have trim speed give it one more second then flare by pushing forward and up.
Go read Rooney's fucking encyclopedia on the issue. I'm amazed that Quest doesn't make it a prerequisite for getting on a cart. Or...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3695
good day until the wreck
Lauren Tjaden - 2008/12/31 04:29:12 UTC

very light conditions at quest. me, paul, dustin, carl and jamie were going to fly out and back but not high enough so we flew around the patch. i worked small lift using carl's tips...he is english where conditions are weak, and is 2nd in world.

came in with no wind after an hour and had right wing drop. instead of wrestling gilder straight i tried to flare while desperately trying to straighten.

bad bad whack. horrible pain, i could not move. screaming with pain, literally. took a very long time to get me out and to the hospital. got very good drugs.

turned out to be badly dislocated shoulder. they had to knock me out to put it back in but it was so bad i kept waking up and screaming. finally they got it done but then they had a hard time waking me back up. drugs were so wierd by the end i could not leave for hours, i'd just start bawling for no reason.

am home now. will see ortho in the next few days. hopefully the damn thing will stay in joint so i can skip surgery. much better with the pain now it's back in joint. looking at maybe 6-8 weeks currently.

anyhow will be ok. pretty crappy day and it doesn't do much for the typing either.
Just get Lauren Eminently-Qualified-Tandem-Pilot Tjaden to show you how to do it.
Notice too that the tug was back and forth between your down tubes. That is mild PIO. (Really Designed Induced Oscillation.)
Good thing the focal point of his safe towing system kicked in when it did, huh Bill? No telling what might have happened if he'd been allowed to function as Pilot In Command. Even the tug pilot wasn't together enough to make a good decision in the interest of his safety - not to mention his own.
If you didn't have a vertical stabilizer on the tail already putting one on will help with the mild PIO.
So would a little airtime behind the glider. But, of course, in order to be able to get that...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Davis Straub - 2011/08/28 15:26:28 UTC

Then again, Russell Brown had us double up behind him after six breaks in a row at Zapata. We couldn't figure out why we had so many breaks so quickly. Maybe just coincidence.
...he'd almost certainly need to use a dangerous stronglink.
Don't increase the strength of your weak-link. (Don't--Don't!)
GOD NO!!! That one has been finely tuned over the course of quite literally hundreds of thousands of tows for optimal performance with YOUR glider - and everybody else's.

19-03703
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5529/14422573378_5385a9a99a_o.png
Image
Image
http://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3885/14422571978_d47ec5c921_o.png
21-04709

Fuck you, Bill.
bisfal bisto

glider suddenly went high fast.
You were off the cart five seconds. You were a bit high for the last two of them.
Philip Montague

Way too high on the tow...
Bullshit. THIS:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_n5B3-MIC4


is way too high on the tow.
...broke the weak line (before you would have locked-out).
Yeah. The weak link only and always breaks when it senses an impending lockout. That's its purpose - to increase the safety of the towing operation by being able to think faster and better than either of the humans involved.

So Niki was about to lock out too, right? No, wait. Hers only popped 'cause she neglected to change it after ten tows or one tow or whatever it is that ensures that it stays within the optimal range.
Then on approach too late/slow onto the uprights left you no time or speed to set-up for a flare.
Fuck the flare.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1514
Crash
Nobody - 2014/02/23 06:25:51 UTC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNCrD6Cnc48
hang glider crash
Bill Cummings

Don't increase the strength of your weak-link. (Don't--Don't!)
You've got s*** for brains, Bill. Rot in Hell pigf*****.
I don't hate him THAT much.
Bob Kuczewski - 2014/02/23 22:23:23 UTC

Nobody,

It's through pointless, hostile, vulgar, and inaccurate comments like this that you continue to be isolated from the main forum.
- No it's not, Bob...

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=929
Training Manual Comments / Contribution
Bob Kuczewski - 2012/01/13 16:17:18 UTC

The person who has registered as "Nobody" has been restricted to the Free Speech Zone for failing to identify themselves after making personal attacks against members of this forum.
He continues to be isolated from the main forum for not identifying "THEMSELF" after making "pointless, hostile, vulgar, and inaccurate comments" like that one. But a pathological liar such as yourself has a real hard time maintaining a good grip on reality.

And you never had the SLIGHTEST problem with any of your pet assholes making pointless, hostile, vulgar, and inaccurate comments like that one against me under a real name like Peter Birren or a fake name like Pilgrim (Charles Schneider).

- What vulgarity? Most of what I'm seeing is long strings of asterisks. It's a bit difficult for me to tell what he's actually trying to say - pigf******.
I apologize to the rest of this forum for having recently encouraged Nobody to rejoin us.
Yeah, Bob only wants stupid people in lockstep with the values of his little dictatorship participating.
Bill Cummings - 2014/02/24 03:42:26 UTC

Nobody,

You are so judgmental. Image
Get your shit together on aviation, Bill. Then he won't have to be.
Have I ever blown up at you for holding a different opinion than I hold? Image
Get it through your skull that this has nothing to do with OPINIONS, Bill. It's about PHYSICS.

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1186
D. Straub's Politics=Gun Grabbing, Constitution/Baby Killing
Bill Cummings - 2013/02/19 02:43:00 UTC

No one should confuse me with someone that has been exposed to higher education. I avoided that style of incarceration like the plague. Image Image :oops:
And if you can't be bothered to do your homework then stay the fuck out of the conversation.
It is further my opinion...
Fuck your - and everybody's - OPINION. That word is a dead giveaway that the author is fundamentally clueless.
...that if you need a stronger weak-link to save you.
Then you were doing something wrong before the need. Image
- Right, Bill. There's no fuckin' way Mother Nature can throw anything into the equation that can kill you...
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson.
...if your rope breaks. Dr. Hewett removed vertical air movement from our list of potential problems over 33 years ago and rope breaks abruptly stopped killing people and abruptly started saving them.

- Likewise...
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"A bad flyer won't hurt a pin man but a bad pin man can kill a flyer." - Bill Bennett
...a bad pin man lost the ability to put a flyer into a situation in which he couldn't afford a rope break.

- Stronger than WHAT, Bill? Some arbitrary number or piece of fishing line some shithead pulled out of his ass and declared sacred and infallible protection against anything bad that can happen on tow? You told this guy not to use a stronger weak link with no fuckin' clue as to:
-- how fuzzed out it was
-- what:
--- it translated to in terms of towline tension
--- the glider's flying and max certified operating weight was
-- whether or not it was up to the legal FAA minimum

- It is further my opinion that if you need a:
-- stronger weak-link
-- good pair of wheels
-- quality certified helmet
-- drag chute
-- parachute
-- seat belt
-- air bag
-- life raft
-- ejection seat
-- medevac chopper
-- shock trauma facility
to save you then you were doing something wrong before the need.

Fuckin' RIGHT, Bill. Lotsa times people ARE doing things wrong enough that if there's a(nother) shit piece of tow equipment in the configuration it can make the difference between ending the session with another three hours of airtime or a ride out in a body bag. What's your fuckin' point?

Zack Marzec went up:
- with an idiot fucking:
-- pro toad bridle
-- Rooney Link
- into a monster thermal breaking off from the takeoff field.

Remove any one of those three threats and he has a normal flying day. The only reason we need to kill him is to get the point across and discredit all the pieces of shit who've hijacked the sport.

- So what you're saying is that the purpose of a "stronger" weak link is to increase the safety of the towing operation, RIGHT? Which is the polar opposite of what sleazebags and shitheads like Dennis Pagen, Bill Moyes, Davis Straub, Jim Rooney, Dr. Trisa Tilletti are saying, RIGHT?

You spouted a lot of crap, ignored / refused to answer questions / respond to points, called Zack C a troll and us One Point Fivers liars and helped sabotage the discussion. And I haven't forgotten that you supported Bob and his sleazy, hypocritical, cowardly treatment of Yours Truly. You shouldn't be all that surprised to be declared and treated as an enemy combatant.
Post Reply