http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=42445
split the USHPA in two
Mark G. Forbes - 2015/05/14 23:38:42 UTC
You can ramble on semi-coherently about your fantasies, but those of us actually doing the work need to deal with the world as it is, not as you imagine it might be. If you want to go off and be "pure", go right ahead. Nobody is stopping you, and I for one would be delighted if you and BobK form an organization that caters to pilots who just can't stand to work within USHPA's constraints. It'll give them a place to go and complain about how the world (and USHPA) is all screwed up, while the rest of us continue on, doing the best we can in the world that is real. But meanwhile, give it a rest. And try to work on the whole "coherent thought" thing, ok?
Michael Grisham - 2015/05/16 20:47:55 UTC
Bille,
While TP is a local problem, it highlights the overall...
...deliberate...
...failure of the USHPA with regard to the organization's mission statement of safety, especially with the two FAR exemptions of towing and tandem.
The only exemption for towing is aero. The FAA doesn't give a flying fuck about surface.
Also TP is located in the premier nanny state...
Kuczewskiland?
...the "left" coast, where the populous protect women and children with regulations. The threat is not that Bob and Joe are going to lose a soaring site or outlaw P and H. The principle Machiavellian problem is the USHPA does not control the masses of the nanny state and the threat is the nanny populous banning the sport.
Bullshit.
The history of Hang Gliding Joe recalls was the threat that Hang Gliding of the 1970's would be have been banned or severely regulated by the Feds due to the deaths of young flyers in a craft that exhibited safety design...
There was no design. It wasn't rocket science to install reflex bridles and washout struts. How long did it take hang gliding to start getting its shit together relative to the length of time Wilbur and Orville went from zilch to three axis controlled powered flight?
...flaws in pitch and yaw stability along with the lack of understanding and training of the young flyers.
Which still totally sucks today and gets worse by the year.
The central purpose of having a "national" organization as the USHGA was to protect the sport from regulation by the Feds or an outright ban.
By running fake fatality investigations, shredding accident reports, and publishing works of total fiction.
The similarity is that paragliders and the standard rogallo hang glider have the same tendency for the airfoil to collapse in turbulent air. And I will make the argument on behalf of the paraglider community, that the paraglider is designed to reinflate and become a stable flying platform again while the standard rogallo hang glider did not exhibit that capability.
Full luff dive.
It is the simple point of the infamous Rick Masters that the paraglider pilot needs some altitude to reinflate the parglider before he/she bounces off the ground along with whoever is attached to them.
Hang gliders, on the other hand...
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8143/7462005802_bbc0ac66ac_o.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bRrpHNa68iY/UQ6Pv9gRZyI/AAAAAAAAjTg/Hc22bx5122Q/s2048/20943781_BG1.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8737/16790136379_c1c17b2f86_o.png
The really cool thing about hang gliders is that stalls present no problems for them - 'specially when induced by extra safe weak links.
Sorry to say, that is the real world. With the principle reason of the USHGA (along with the HGMA) as a national organization so the sport would not be regulated or banned, the irony is the USHPA is promoting a glider with a similar design flaw of collapsing in flight as the standard rogallo.
Personally, I am with you Bille and do not like the government or the populous passing laws protecting people from themselves.
But you're totally cool with:
The United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association, Inc. - 2015/03/13
12. Standard Operating Procedure
01. Basic Safety Requirements
05. Equipment
-B. Other Equipment
01. It is required that pilots wear protective headgear whenever they are in their harness and hooked-in or otherwise attached to their glider.
I was raised as a free range kid and did not kill myself in the process of growing up, but there probably were some close shaves along the way.
Well at least back then there was no chance of you hopping on a paraglider for a coastal flight with Brad Geary or Max Marien.
People need to know the risks and be responsible for their actions for those who chose to take up the sports of paragliding and hang gliding.
Good freakin' luck.
So returning to my original premise of the overall failure of the USHPA with regard to the organization in adhering to their mission statement is the USHPA is amiss in the premier mission of safety by ignoring their agreement with the FAA and the people of the United States by not enforcing the provisions of the exemptions of a tandem and towing as training activities.
Name them. The fact that you keep refering to the towing exemption tells us that you're clueless.
The problem is that schools and instructors rated by the USHPA operating under the FAR exemption are selling joy rides to the uniformed public and when there are accidents killing uniformed...
That's twice.
...people, especially innocent women and children...
Here we go...
...the populous of the nanny state are going to stop you and me from making our choice to fly.
- Yeah, right.
- The u$hPa thrill ride industry machine has already stopped me from making my choice to fly and none of you motherfuckers gave a rat's ass about me so why should I give a rat's ass about you?
If the exemptions are lost due to the deaths caused by joy ride for profit operators...
- WHAT exemptionS?
- Little would make me happier than to see the tandem exemption go down the toilet. And I'd be pretty happy watching aerotowing get blown out of the fuckin' sky. It's been a total disaster for thirty years.
...the really sad part is there are magnificent schools and instructors out there...
BULLSHIT.
...that use the exemptions for the intended purpose of training.
See above.
I know of one school that has their own minimum age of training...
Six?
...and does not sell joy rides to children.
- They must be doing a much better job of not killing innocent uniformed children than all those other places are.
- Nobody under eighteen, huh? They're such crappy tandem joy ride pilots that they're pretty sure they're gonna kill somebody (again) in the not too distant future and they're totally cool with killing an eighteen year old but a seventeen and a half year old is really beyond the pale.
- So how come you're not naming them and not letting me know where I can send my innocent little people of varying ages to safely not fly?
The TP "Brad Video" clearly shows a reprehensible operation placing innocent lives at risk not only by the instructors but condoned by the operator and USHPA.
- Get fucked.
- The TP "Brad Video" doesn't clearly show anything any more. It's been shut down.
- If it was so condoned by u$hPa then how come Brad got his tandem ticked permanently revoked for violating nonexistent SOPs?
The hang gliding tandem tow accident at Jean is another demonstration of the failure of the USHPA to police the tow and tandem for training exemptions taking innocent lives.
THERE IS NO *TOW* EXEMPTION. He could've launched himself and the kid off of one of the nearby mountains and been doubly fatally slammed in by one of those invisible dust devils that have become so popular lately and it would've been exactly the same deal - just a lot less convenient/efficient.
I don't see the failure as necessarily between P and H. It is a disregard for laws and safety.
You don't have a fucking clue what the laws and the SOPs are - and you've never done shit to try to get bad ones shredded or good ones implemented and/or enforced.
. . . who just can't stand to work within USHPA's constraints. It'll give them a place to go and complain about how the world (and USHPA) is all screwed up, while the rest of us continue on, doing the best we can in the world that is real.
The USHPA is all screwed up when the USHPA is not adhering to their own
constraints in following and enforcing the towing and tandem for training exemptions under the FAR's.
What
constraints are you imagining weren't adhered to in the Kelly/Arys? What are your ideas on...
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1157
Accident information please.
Bob Kuczewski - 2013/02/13 05:15:02 UTC
I agree with you Warren. This is one of the areas where Tad is on the right track.
...how things might have a bit better? Bob thinks this in one of the areas where I'm on the right track. Maybe I could help you get on the right track too and together we might be able to figure something out.
If the USHPA was actually interested in protecting and promoting safety with the exemptions they would currently be drafting and promoting to the FAA a revision to the exemptions with a minimum age for training of 14 years for the trainee.
Yeah, it's OK to slam in fourteen-year-olds. They're not as little and cute and innocent. Lots of them are, in fact, real assholes.
USHPA is putting those exemptions and the sports of both paragliding and hang gliding at risk of being outlawed.
Yeah...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnYC5BXdt48
12-year-old killed in hang glider accident
Bryan Callahan - 2015/03/27
The FAA WAS notified of the crash and did help with the investigation but Metro says because the glider didn't have a tail number and there was a truck pulling it at the time Metro is going to handle the investigation.
Like they actually give a shit about anything.
That is the real Machiavellian World in the nanny state.
What's a "nanny state"? I thought you wanted safety regulations - real and imaginary - enforced.
As far as splitting the organization up? There are plenty of responsible schools, instructors, and manufactures who love the sport and are interested in safety who will ultimately make that decision.
- Funny you don't seem to be able to actually name any.
- So if there are then how come they're not showing up in any of these discussions?