Two Dead on Hang Glider
Nah, it's pretty much all in the tandem thrill ride industry and everything that stems from it.Mark G. Forbes - 2015/04/17 01:19:44 UTC
Nuances
As with many things, the devil's in the details.
Thank you so very much for clarifying that issue for us, Mark. I don't recall ANYONE ANYWHERE EVER raising it as an issue or coming into the sport with that assumption or expectation - but thanks bigtime anyway.It is not USHPA's responsibility to guarantee the safety of pilots.
How 'bout:Neither is it the responsibility of instructors, flight park owners, land managers or other pilots.
- backup loop manufacturers? If our mains fail and our backups blow apart can our families sue them?
- Florida Ridge deliberately launching gliders on a "runway"...
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=5089
The Good-The Bad-The Ugly....
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=8719Socrates Zayas - 2008/01/14 05:22:38 UTC
Fort Lauderdale
Yesterday was a very emotional day for me and my household. My better half did something that I really didn't expect from a medical student/mother/busy no time to waste...
This would be the final flight of the day, just in front of her was a student tandem flight about to launch, so I was headed back to the car to finalize the packing up when I heard the tug make the familiar sound it does when a weak link breaks. I looked back to see the tug circle around and saw a wing turned up in a WHACK configuration. I was like "wow". Then I noticed it wasn't the tandem but Sherb-Air's Falcon 170.
When I got there her nose was lacerated and her lip was bleeding (yeah, she had a full face helmet) and the dolly's left wheel was missing.
The radiography showed acute multiple fractures around the top and head of the humerus. Her nose didn't break but she may have hairline fractures to the septum. She had a hard time remembering the date, day, names of her kids, number of kids, and other basic things...
The dolly had hit a huge hole and she went left shoulder into the ground at 25+ mph. The weak link did its job and may have saved her life.
Bad Aerotow Launch
Axel Banchero - 2008/09/30 19:44:01 UTC
I almost got hurt. And I heard stories of people getting hurt at the same place for the same reason.
I was getting ready in the dolly and took a look ahead. I saw a bump in my runway but didn't care much about it. While my friend assisted me to get ready to launch, I asked him "Is that some taller grass in front of me or is it a bump?" He replied "It's a bump so grab yourself tight on the base bar".
I hit it with the left wheel and the rope in my left hand just snapped off from my fingers. It actually hurt.
Somehow I managed to control the glider and take off without hitting the ground with one of my wingtips.
After I landed, my friend told me the tip of my wing passed about five inches off the ground.
Scott C. Wise - 2008/09/30 23:29:30 UTC
I've still got a problem with that "bump".
This is an active flight park. Don't they do anything to maintain their grounds? I've been at any number of small airports with grass strips and they are flat and level with no holes and no bumps. Somebody actually spends time "grooming" the area - for obvious and serious safety reasons.
How the heck does an aerotow park get off NOT doing a similar or better job? !!!!!
...a mountain biker wouldn't be caught dead on? Brad get's a permanent revocation of his tandem ticket for THIS:Axel Banchero - 2008/10/01 04:04:47 UTC
Yes, this is the Florida Ridge. Where Doc's wife got hurt after hitting a bump or something like that. I also heard another story with broken bones at the same place in a situation pretty much like mine.
113-220710
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8700/17205433495_ea31ccab99_o.png
but those total pieces o' shit at Florida Ridge get to demolish all the paying victims they feel like by deliberately launching them on a fuckin' minefield?
And the motherfuckers that sell and force everyone to use the shoddiest excuses for releases they can concoct in flagrant violation of even u$hPa regulations are totally off the hook.Each pilot is personally and individually responsible for their own safety.
Yeah, we all know that, Mark. How else do you explain Steve Exceptionally-Knowledgeable Wendt getting the Instructor of the Year Award for 2004 and then on:That is a fundamental tenet of our sport.
- 2005/05/29 towing Holly Korzilius pro toad with bent pin "release" within easy reach into a critical oscillation then dumping her at the worst conceivable instant into a stall that two thirds kill her
- 2005/10/01 having Bill Priday - whom he signed off on his One, Two, and Three without ever once having him comply with the mandatory hook in check regulation and rating requirement - run off Whitwell without the Sport 2 he'd sold him
- 2006/02/21 having Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney, one of his instructor products, dive his glider and tandem thrill rider into the powerlines after finally not getting away with skipping a hook-in check
Cool. I can guarantee that unless they manage to escape your clutches with outside help they WON'T be.As an association we cannot guarantee that pilots will be safe.
No shit, Mark. ANYBODY on the u$hPa Fatality Report Shredding Committee would really know that.We know that there is risk...
And......and that some will be injured or killed pursuing our activity.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27736
Increase in our USHpA dues
...you're ALWAYS gonna know exactly why and what could've been done to ensure that it wouldn't have happened.Mark G. Forbes - 2012/12/20 06:21:33 UTC
There are also numerous legal issues associated with accident reports, which we're still wrestling with. It's a trade-off between informing our members so they can avoid those kinds of accidents in the future, and exposing ourselves to even more lawsuits by giving plaintiff's attorneys more ammunition to shoot at us.
Imagine a report that concludes, "If we'd had a procedure "x" in place, then it would have probably prevented this accident. And we're going to put that procedure in place at the next BOD meeting." Good info, and what we want to be able to convey. But what comes out at trial is, "Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, my client suffered injury because USHPA knew or should have known that a safety procedure was not in place, and was therefore negligent and at fault." We're constantly walking this line between full disclosure and handing out nooses at the hangmen's convention.
Going out on the Jack Show, pretending you give a rat's ass, telling people:We have to recognize that and deal with the headaches that come from it.
- not to speculate, that we have a crack investigator on his way out there to get to the truth of the matter and will convey that information to our members when we learn what really happened
- week after week that you don't have any information from the investigation yet because it's so thorough and professional that every punctuation mark needs to be properly perfected before any information can be released to any of us stupid muppets
- that due to liability issues the entire report has been shredded and not one of us muppets will ever get to see a single one of those meticulously perfected punctuation marks
It's a dirty job but...
Unlike board members, administrators, ratings officials, instructors, bent pin release manufacturers, 130 pound Greenspot enforcers, hook-in check discussions saboteurs...Pilots will make mistakes...
And ALWAYS *BECAUSE* of your best efforts to annihilate all traces of competent airmanship from the sport....and sometimes they will end up in danger despite their best efforts to avoid it.
How?What we *can* do is to provide information to pilots that will help them to make good, safe decisions.
- You've already told us flat fuckin' out that you WON'T 'cause if you did you'd get your sleazy serial killing asses sued out of existence for not having done it three or four decades ago.
- You think that just because you sleazy pigfuckers got elected by hordes of total morons to positions within this crime syndicate that you're qualified to define this information - despite the fact that you've been ignoring, distorting, shredding crash data for decades?
Really? I was SO hoping that by providing information to pilots you could GUARANTEE that they'd ALWAYS make good, safe decisions. Like when fifteen-year-olds are provided information in driver's ed that will help them to make good, safe decisions we can GUARANTEE that all of them always will.We cannot guarantee that they will...
Oh. You CAN? So why haven't you? Where is it? When can we expect to get a peek at it? In about a month? The time I was locked down in Bob's Basement for him to run his "experiment"?...but we can provide what information we have to inform them of how to minimize risk.
Oh great! So is it OK for us solo pilots to use the tandem operating rules to stay safe? Can't we just hook in a Cabbage Patch Kid to take care of the specific tandem issues and duplicate everything to the T?The tandem operating rules are one such means of informing pilots.
So what do you think went wrong with Kelly and Arys? You checked Kelly out under the tandem operating rules, there was never a single hint of a criticism for conduct, he had well under a half dozen wing walking videos, the surviving family members have nothing but praise to heap on him, near two months of intense crack accident investigation in cooperation with the Vegas police and we haven't heard so much as an accusation that his backup loop was twisted. Yet we have a 55 year old Hang Five Advanced Tandem Instructor and his eleven year old skydiving student deader than doornails on the first tow of the day in totally benign conditions at the best surface tow site on the planet. And NOTHING was done WRONG by ANYBODY involved in the operation.
Well, wide fucking open flatter than pancakes dry lakebeds are obviously out. How 'bout we give the ideal landing zone - the narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place - a shot?The definition of a tandem site is another.
Oh, please don't burden us with any so-ons. We're already buried in so much solid safety information that we won't be able to scratch the surface any time within the next half dozen years.And so on...
Tons of people getting demolished in......our SOPs are essentially a collection of good advice accrued over the years, often from experience gained in past accidents.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21088
What you wish you'd known then?
...spot landing contests? More practice with tighter spot landing tolerances.Doug Doerfler - 2011/03/02 05:24:44 UTC
Nothing creates carnage like declaring a spot landing contest.
People getting killed because their Rooney Links are breaking after they've gotten into too much trouble?
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Lighter Rooney Links. Problem solved. I'm sorry that you don't like that the tug pilot has the last word... but tough titties. Don't like it? Don't ask him to tow you. Go troll somewhere else buddy. Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney is over this.Jim Rooney - 2013/03/05 21:40:02 UTC
I'm not saying that you've claimed that a stronger weaklink allows for a greater AOA... I'm telling you that it does.
You know this.
I'll spell it out anyway...
Increases in AOA increase the load factor... push it beyond what the weaklink can stand and *POP*, you're off tow.
Increase the load factor that the weaklink can withstand and you increase the achievable AOA.
This ain't truck towing. There is no pressure limiting mechanism. Push out and you load the line. Push out hard and you'll break the weaklink... that's the whole idea.
You want to break off the towline? Push out... push out hard... it will break.
As others have pointed out, they've used this fact intentionally to get off tow. It works.
You want MORE.
I want you to have less.
This is the fundamental disagreement.
You're afraid of breaking off with a high AOA? Good... tow with a WEAKER weaklink... you won't be able to achieve a high AOA. Problem solved.
I'm sorry that you don't like that the tug pilot has the last word... but tough titties.
Don't like it?
Don't ask me to tow you.
Go troll somewhere else buddy.
I'm over this.
We can't say that if you follow the SOPs you won't get hurt, but we CAN say that if you don't follow the SOPs you are increasing your chances of being hurt or killed.
The United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association, Inc. - 2015/03/03
12. Standard Operating Procedure
02. Pilot Proficiency System
08. Intermediate Hang Gliding Rating (H-3)
-B. Required Witnessed Tasks
02. Demonstrated Skills and Knowledge
-g. For witnessed tasks, all landings must be safe, smooth, on the feet, and in control.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22176Gil Dodgen - 1995/01
All of this reminds me of a comment Mike Meier made when he was learning to fly sailplanes. He mentioned how easy it was to land a sailplane (with spoilers for glide-path control and wheels), and then said, "If other aircraft were as difficult to land as hang gliders no one would fly them."
Paragliding Collapses
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27086Jim Rooney - 2011/06/12 13:57:58 UTC
Most common HG injury... spiral fracture of the humerus.
Steve Pearson on landings
Steve Pearson - 2012/03/28 23:26:05 UTC
I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.
Right. NOBODY's ever been scratched as a consequence of any of the political machinations within the monopoly corporation which controls hang gliding in the US.(I'm speaking here of SOPs related to flight...nobody so far has been killed by violating an elections committee SOP.)
Goddam fucking right they are. You've already told us flat out and we've obviously seen for ourselves that you're NEVER gonna use YOUR SOPs to FIX a problem 'cause you'll open yourselves up to liability issues and the very real risk of getting sued out of existence. So what CAN be documented is your constant gutting of SOLID SOPs, like the use of certified gliders for aerotowing, and amendment of dangerous bullshit SOPs, like mandatory helmet use at all times while clipped into gliders.Our SOPs are reviewed and amended regularly as we gain more knowledge and learn from experience.
And obviously THOSE issues supersede any concerns about killing the next eleven year old skydiving student.We're working on the accident reporting system revision, but it's slow going as we work out the details of confidentiality of information and protecting it from being used against us through legal discovery.
Oh really? Just how many semesters of post grad do you need to become the expert on how our totally excellent accident reporting system is being degraded, perverted, turned against everyone who actually goes up in these things?I'm not the expert on exactly how that's being done...
Yep......but there's a framework in place for it and it's in process.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
I never doubted for a nanosecond that you assholes had a process in place - one that...Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 06:04:23 UTC
Troll
Hahahaha.
That seriously made me chuckle.
I get what you're saying Christopher.
Please understand that I'm not advocating professional infalliblity. Not really sure where I mentioned that, but I can understand where you might have drawn that assumption. None the less, I simply refer to "us" as the "professional pilots" as a term to describe the pilots that do this for a living. Yes, we're just humans... bla bla bla... my point is that we do this a whole sh*tload more than the "average pilot"... and not just a little more... a LOT.
We discuss this stuff a lot more as well. We vet more ideas. This isn't just "neat stuff" to us... it's very real and we deal with it every day.
It's not "us" that has the track record... it's our process.
We're people just like anyone else. And that's the point. THIS is how we do it... normal, fallible humans... and it bloody well works.
So I don't give much credence to something that someone doesn't agree with about what we do for some theoretical reason.
Take this weaklink nonsense.
What do I "advocate"?
I don't advocate shit... I *USE* 130 test lb, greenspun cortland braided fishing line.
It is industry standard.
It is what *WE* use.
If someone's got a problem with it... we've got over ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND TANDEM TOWS and COUNTLESS solo tows that argue otherwise. So they can politely get stuffed.
As my friend likes to say... "Sure, it works in reality... but does it work in theory?"
Hahahahhaa... I like that one a lot
...you've been using a long time and are quite familiar and comfortable with. One that's just as lethal to the people actually flying the gliders as the standard aerotow weak link was.Jim Rooney - 2011/08/24 16:26:09 UTC
Welcome to towing.
We've been doing this a long time and are quite familiar and comfortable with our processes.
Be nice and we can discuss it.
Be obnoxious and you can piss off.
Your choice.
What's it matter? Everybody and his dog knows that it was gonna be a total cover-up exercise by a u$hPa/Industry dildo starting Day One and the only legitimate information we were ever gonna get on it happened through the mainstream news media in the course of a couple days - mostly the first one.As to this specific accident, I've heard nothing as yet about the current state of the investigation.
I'm totally confident you'll hear about it then too, Mark. Meaning NEVER - 'cause y'all are doing such an thorough job on this one that it's NEVER gonna be complete and until it's complete there will be NOTHING to report.I'm confident that when it's complete and there's something to report, I'll hear about it then.
There's ALWAYS a compelling reason not to report on stuff 'cause there's ALWAYS some degree of contributory negligence attributable to instructors, ratings officials, administrators, and those who set the Standard Operating Procedures and prevent the implementation of fixes to well known lethal and ancient lethal problems.Unless there's a compelling reason not to report on it...
You already have.I'll pass along what I know.
When? Oh, right. Since the investigation will never be complete...If there is a compelling reason which prevents me from discussing it, I'll tell you that too.
The same way you had absolutely nothing to say regarding the reason for Brad getting his tandem ticket permanently revoked for the totally legal, safe, and aboveboard relative work he was doing while Max - the other half of the atrocity on the video - never got the slightest slap on the wrist.If I haven't said anything about it, then it's because I don't have anything to say yet.