Re: Wheels
<BS> wrote:We have a similar problem.birukobu wrote:Maybe it is because of we do not have flat enough grass fields, but a lot of swamps, stones and bushes.Narrow dry riverbeds with large rocks strewn all over the place.
<BS> wrote:We have a similar problem.birukobu wrote:Maybe it is because of we do not have flat enough grass fields, but a lot of swamps, stones and bushes.Narrow dry riverbeds with large rocks strewn all over the place.
1. You should've figured out that it wasn't Aleksey flying it.smokenjoe50 - 2015/06/05 14:12:12 UTC
You should burn that glider. You have no buisness taking people tandom. Whack!
Suck my dick, Joe.Mike Bilyk - 2013/09/07 17:07:26 UTC
Wheel landings are for girls!
1. If he was a passenger then he shouldn't be assigned much responsibility - should he?Jack Barth - 2015/06/05 14:16:36 UTC
landing
Appeared passenger may have interfered with landing by touching down and running prior to pilot in. Command. The wing didn't fare well. Wheels probably would have saved it.
And dropped his guard a bit.That day was decided to make short flight just for fun...
Well, at least it wasn't one of those tow takeoffs with all that deadly complexity...You did not seen the take-off
4-11-15 6PM. Local Intermediate HG pilot is landing in moderate 5-10 mph winds and does an aggressive flare that is a bit early (still too much airspeed to initiate the flare). The glider pops up and drops a wing which results in a moderate whack. Although the impact was not very hard as whacks go, the pilot suffered a dislocated shoulder. Prognosis is good for full recovery in a few weeks.
The aggressive flare was a new trick for this pilot. For years the pilot's technique was a running out landing with gradual flare sometime called moon walking. So in this case in trying to make the landing with slower ground speed, it became less in control than what the pilot generally has. The trick is to be very sure of airspeed for flare timing and also that wings are very level if the decision to flare more aggressively is made. Recall the article in the mag some years back entitled, the "Fearless Flawless Flareless Landing".
Wow Bob! Somebody bonking a wheel landing in the sand at Dockweiler! Who'da thunk! Real smoking gun video! Guess he learned HIS lesson. No fuckin' way he'd have bonked it going for a foot landing. Hope in a couple months after he's recovered sufficiently from his injuries he'll get serious about foot landing and flare timing.Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/07 18:29:44 UTC
There's no doubt that wheels on a hang glider contribute to increased overall safety. But just as with seat belts and air bags, there are times when they don't work as planned and can even make matters worse. I'm posting this video not to discourage pilots from using wheels, but to make pilots aware of their limitations.
This video clip was taken recently at Dockweiler of a pilot making an intentional wheel landing. The wheels used in this case were very broad and intended for landing on sand. But even in this case, the wheels happened to hit the sand in a manner that severely limited their effectiveness. Here's a frame by frame clip played at 1 second per frame:
This clip contains about 50 frames. It may take a little while to load, but once loaded it should play at 1 frame per second.
F_2420_to_2471.gif (2.41 MiB)
How 'bout human arms and...Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/07 20:24:17 UTC
I posted the frame by frame version because the full-speed version goes by very quickly. I had a lot of trouble uploading it, and some of the early versions (up to a few minutes ago) didn't show all the frames. So you might want to watch it again now that it's all there.
I'm somewhat convinced that the wheels stuck in the sand because of the way the pilot's body swung forward into an almost upright position just after touch down. There was little or no flare because the pilot was doing an intentional wheel landing - intending to roll the glider onto the ground. As an airplane pilot, I was trained to flare slowly holding the landing gear off the ground as long as possible until there just wasn't enough lift to keep the gear from touching. Of course that means that the wheels must be just inches (or less) from the runway or you'll get a bit of a bounce when it stalls and drops. We called that "greasing it in", and it was very smooth when done properly. In a hang glider, that can be a challenging task ... especially for someone relatively early in their training.
My post here was mostly to point out that a wheel landing can sometimes be much more challenging than a "stand up flare" or a "run it out" landing. Human legs are much more nimble and adaptable than wheels, and they have a lot more "give" when needed (up to a point of course).
Really? Don't recall you taking much issue with a couple decades of aerotow industry mandatory "one size fits all" weak links - the kind that blow on takeoff coincidentally six times in a row in light morning conditions.I don't believe in "one size fits all" approaches...
What are your different approaches for dealing with unrepentant child molesters? Any chance you can put them in writing?...and each technique has its advantages and limitations.
So tell me about some of the foot landings you did during your airplane pilot training when it became that the wheel landings weren't gonna work out that great. Alaskan bush pilots? Show me some videos of tandems foot landing. How 'bout paraplegics? Guess they hafta size things up on final and go for foot every now and then.It's good to know when each technique will work and when it might not.
"THE" forum? Think it's a good idea to be getting all your help from people on ONE forum? 'Specially with the kind of people that are on it on it?Robert Kesselring - 2015/07/14 16:48:23 UTC
West Virginia
When reading flying stories on the forum...
1. How often do you read about people NEEDING to have gotten no-step landings, 1 step landings, or 2 step landings?...I often read that people got no-step landings, 1 step landings, or 2 step landings.
Kinda like a 6.16 meter pole vault. Nobody's ever done any better than that. And hardly anybody ever needs to.I get the idea that a no-step landing is considered perfect.
Ever practice a...This is not the way that I thought when I was practicing landings at the training hills.
No you don't. You wanna land like:I wanted to land at a comfortable walking pace with the glider landing in a balanced position on my shoulders for a seamless transition from flying, to walking my glider off the field.
Fuck that. I have yet to meet a REAL hang glider pilot who wouldn't rather watch a whipstall landing in hopes of seeing somebody fold a downtube and/or break an arm.This was the most efficient from a time perspective, because there was usually someone right behind me waiting for me to clear the LZ so that they could launch...
Is that all?...it was also the easiest on my sore legs.
Oh Gawd.The landing at the end of this flight is a good example of what I'm talking about...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb_oOtrSlUs
Yeah, if somebody like that actually existed - besides Jason Boehm, of course.Clearly someone who is excellent at landing would be able to land any way they decide to...
For landing clinic instructors, parts dealers, orthopedic surgeons......but is there any advantage to a no-step landing over what I have been doing?
They crash gliders and break arms and necks. They're totally fucking useless for real world emergency situations - the ones only total assholes get into in the first place.Or do they just accomplish different things for different situations.
And when you become the first person in the history of hang gliding to have perfected that skill there'll be no fuckin' way you won't be able to pull off the no-step landing when landing in tall weeds or crops or (in the USA West) sagebrush.Red Howard - 2015/07/14 17:47:09 UTC
Robert,
Walking or running out a landing is fine, when you are landing in a manicured field. The no-step landing is a required skill when landing in tall weeds or crops, or (in the USA West) sagebrush.
Until you start reading the accounts and looking at the videos of the places actual people - including XCers - are ACTUALLY LANDING. Then you'll find that landings in tall weeds or crops or (in the USA West) sagebrush are totally nonexistent and the ones that DO exist tend to end REALLY BADLY. (Big fuckin' surprise.)Manicured fields are actually fairly rare in the HG world.
Yeah, talk to Paul Vernon...When landing in any vegetation, you have to treat the very tops of this stuff as the real ground level.
No more problem than recovering from a Rooney Link increasing the safety of the towing operation shortly after coming off the cart. Total nonevent. Inconvenience at worst.Glide in, and stop in mid-air as if to make a no-step landing (which it will be), then you just sink straight down to the ground below.
Possibly with your brain permanently mushed.If you need to take one or two steps instead, you could end up flat on your face (not recommended).
But don't worry, you're gonna be an expert pilot LONG before that happens. All of your flares will be perfectly timed. Just like Paul Voight is doing here:If the basetube touches the tops of any of the vegetation before you flare, the plants can wrap around the basetube and cause a very serious (hammer-in) wreck.
Yeah Robert. There's no fuckin' way you're gonna be able to avoid the possibility of landing in tall weeds or crops or (in the USA West) sagebrush. So just perfect your no step landing so you can safely land in whatever crap happens to open up below you. You'll be able to plan your flights well enough not to land in forests, oceans, lakes, rivers but it simply isn't possible to not ever land in tall weeds or crops or (in the USA West) sagebrush. Those things are hang glider magnets. Only sailplanes are capable of avoiding them.Avoid that possibility, at all costs.
So make sure you become an expert pilot within the next couple of weekends 'cause until you do you're at serious risk of plants wrapping around your basetube and causing a very serious (hammer-in) wreck. Don't bother becoming an expert at not landing in tall weeds or crops or (in the USA West) sagebrush. Many have tried and all have failed. And because they expended and wasted all that time and energy in that pursuit they failed to become expert pilots with perfect no step landings and thus had plants wrapping around their basetubes and causing very serious (hammer-in) wrecks. Survival rate for that sorta thing is only about forty percent.The no-step landing is the mark of an expert pilot, from the earliest days of HG.
Because you WILL need it.Practice this skill, before you need it.
See? Red agrees with me! And God help you if you need it sooner - before you've become an expert pilot.You will need it, sooner or later.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27086NMERider - 2012/03/14 15:17:14 UTC
Landing clinics don't help in real world XC flying. I have had the wind do 180 degree 15 mph switches during my final legs. What landing clinic have you ever attended that's going to help? I saved that one by running like a motherfukker. And BTW - It was on large rocks on an ungroomed surface.
Jim Rooney threw a big tantrum and stopped posting here.
His one-technique-fits-all attitude espoused on the Oz Report Forum has become tiresome to read. It does not work in the fucked-up world of XC landings and weary pilots.
I refuse to come in with both hands on the downtubes ever again. I have had some very powerful thermals and gusts kick off and lost control of the glider due to hands on the downtubes. I prefer both hands on the control bar all the way until trim and ground effect. I have been lifted right off the deck in the desert and carried over 150 yards.
I like what Steve Pearson does when he comes in and may adapt something like that.
...in actual problematic circumstances.Steve Pearson - 2012/03/28 23:26:05 UTC
I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.
Don't worry, Robert. This guy obviously wasn't the expert pilot you'll undoubtedly be within the next few weekends.Gerolf Heinrichs - 2004/06/24
Bad news from the Europeans in Millau - and it's not just about the weather!
This is the major hang gliding event of the season and was expected to be the highlight of the European competition flying. Due to a most competent organising team around meet director Richard Walbec everybody expected only the very best from it.
Now, one task into the meet we are all hanging our heads as we just get confirmation about the fatal accident of Croatian team pilot Ljubomir Tomaskovic. He apparently encountered some strong turbulences on his landing approach. He got pitched up and turned around from a strong gust at low altitude, then impacted tailwind into some treetops from where he fell hard onto the ground.
Yeah, you might be interested in reading it, Robert. You might also be interested in knowing that the Patron Saint of Hang Gliding has never done much in the way of flying hang gliders and just about all of what he HAS done has been in the way of tandem thrill rides coming down at airports and landing using massive roll in gear with castering front wheels. That and some scooter tow instruction at the same putting greens in zilch morning and evening air.Brad Barkley - 2015/07/14 16:58:58 UTC
Robert,
You might be interested in reading this thread. (It's 21 pages long!)
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26379
Landings
How NECESSARY did it look to you? How much FUN...NMERider - 2015/07/14 19:37:20 UTC
Robert,
Your landing in the video looked very good to me.
...did it look like to you?NMERider - 2012/10/24 21:47:05 UTC
I have to say that landing on the wheels is so much fun it's not funny.
Do you KNOW his instructor? The fact that he's got an instructor's ticket and works for Matt is good enough for you? I notice you don't seem to be a whole lot more impressed by Master Instructor...Please consult your instructor about your landings.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27262NMERider - 2012/09/25 07:01:39 UTC
Why would CSS want that when his last landing clinic resulted in a broken arm to one of his students?
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30824NMERider - 2012/10/04 06:17:04 UTC
In fact, by your insolence you have done more to reduce safety in this sport than anyone else I can think of in recent history. Your holier than thou attitude and general condescending attitude have been a bane to this forum and this sport for as long as I have returned.
...Ryan Instant-Hands-Free-Release Voight than I am.NMERider - 2014/02/25 06:05:06 UTC
What part of:wasn't clear?...his rather nonsensical and too-often phantasmagorical version of physics and aerodynamics.
Ryan is a classic example of a superbly talented athlete who is ill-equipped to write a comprehensive training manual or academically meaningful text.
How 'bout ace tandem instructor Kelly Harrison?Shopping for answers from people who do not have a personal stake in your safety is risky business.
He doesn't NEED your thoughts on injun country XC landings. He NEEDS to learn how to fly a hang glider in its certified controllable configuration. There was a goddam twelve year old kid in some of my first classes Easter Weekend 1980 who was doing just fine with that. Statistically Robert's only gonna be landing in huge putting greens like Lockout and the stuff that's plastered all over all the valleys in the Chattanooga area.And now for my 2p worth:
As an experienced X/C pilot who often lands in places he's never seen I will share a few thoughts.
But you're perfectly OK running off a fuckin' cliff with no verification of connection to your fuckin' glider during the thirteen seconds we've seen on the video plus gawd knows what since the idiot goddam hang check at the back of the ramp.I think it's very important to know how to bring your glider to a full stop in mid-air and with your feet close to the ground in nil wind and without dropping your control bar or bouncing off of your keel.
Yeah? How 'bout the fact that...That's correct. Only your feet should touch and at most your keel should only tap but never bounce or bang.
...ON A TWELVE HUNDRED AND FIFTY FOOT VERTICAL FLIGHT HE DOESN'T HAVE A SINGLE SECOND OF SAFE CONTROL OVER THE FUCKING GLIDER? You tell me the justification those Lockout motherfuckers have for doing that to him.NMERider - 2012/03/14 15:17:14 UTC
I refuse to come in with both hands on the downtubes ever again. I have had some very powerful thermals and gusts kick off and lost control of the glider due to hands on the downtubes. I prefer both hands on the control bar all the way until trim and ground effect. I have been lifted right off the deck in the desert and carried over 150 yards.
But just the hospital - so don't sweat things too much.This is a good skill to have but if used inappropriately or to the exclusion of all other landing techniques can send you to the hospital as it has done to many others.
If you're in a situation in which you need it - your safety is dependent upon it - you've already fucked up bigtime.It is NOT a superior technique by any reasonable measure.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26854It is simply one of many techniques.
None of which is worth a rat's ass relative to doing things right.Andrew Stakhov - 2012/08/11 13:52:35 UTC
So I just came back from flying in Austria (awesome place btw). Stark difference I noticed is a large chunk of pilots choose to fly with skids instead of wheels. Conversations I had with pilots they say they actually work better in certain situations as they don't get plugged up like smaller wheels. Even larger heavier Atosses were all flying with skids. I was curious why they consistently chose to land on skids on those expensive machines and they were saying that it's just not worth the risk of a mistimed flare or wing hitting the ground... And those are all carbon frames etc.
Yeah, they SHOULD. But when they most NEED TO...It is a skill that any interested pilot should be able to perform with good competence on any single surface glider and most intermediate gliders before attempting to fly X/C.
...they CAN'T.Steve Pearson - 2012/03/28 23:26:05 UTC
I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.
Physics thing.Gil Dodgen - 1995/01
All of this reminds me of a comment Mike Meier made when he was learning to fly sailplanes. He mentioned how easy it was to land a sailplane (with spoilers for glide-path control and wheels), and then said, "If other aircraft were as difficult to land as hang gliders no one would fly them."
The safest of which is to...But there are other skills and techniques in landings that can be safer and more useful in turbulent and gusty conditions.
...belly in prone with your hands on the basetube until you've stopped flying.Christian Thoreson - 2004/10
Thus wheel landings, the safest and easiest way to consistently land a hang glider...
Or get Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney...Talk to your local instructor and get with a mentor to learn these hands-on or see them demonstrated.
Instructor, mentor, professional pilot, Patron Saint of Landings, unhooked tandem launch expert, one of the world's greatest authorities on everything.NMERider - 2012/03/14 15:17:14 UTC
Landing clinics don't help in real world XC flying. I have had the wind do 180 degree 15 mph switches during my final legs. What landing clinic have you ever attended that's going to help? I saved that one by running like a motherfukker. And BTW - It was on large rocks on an ungroomed surface.
Jim Rooney threw a big tantrum and stopped posting here.
His one-technique-fits-all attitude espoused on the Oz Report Forum has become tiresome to read. It does not work in the fucked-up world of XC landings and weary pilots.
Yeah?Nobody's online scribblings will make you a safer pilot.
I'll put my online scribblings up against every douchebag certified instructor on the fuckin' planet.Alan Deikman - 2014/09/23 19:47:06 UTC
Amazing how when this topic comes up every time you see people argue the same arguments over and over again. It has been a classic (although niche) endless Internet flame topic.
I suspect that some of the parties that have posted in threads like these before are refraining now since they have learned that it is nearly (completely?) impossible to change people's minds on the topic.
For my part I will just refer you to the classic Tad Eareckson essay which I call "the gun is always loaded" which is a bit overworked but probably all you will ever need to read regarding FTHI. A lot of people will find it gores their particular sacred Ox, but I have never seen anyone point out a flaw in his logic.
Robert didn't get into the sport because as a kid he'd always dreamt of going XC and landing in tall weeds or crops or (in the USA West) sagebrush. Nobody in this sport has fun...Cheers, Jonathan
P.S. My own landings need plenty of work and I'm working on it too.
...working on landings. Have him work on thermalling, restricted field approaches, aerobatics if you want him to have fun and increase his long term survival outlook.NMERider - 2012/10/24 21:47:05 UTC
I have to say that landing on the wheels is so much fun it's not funny.