The Bob Show

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/faq.php
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a Board of Directors for the US Hawks?
Nope. Just a facade of one consisting of Emperor Bob and four other individuals he stacked in to suit his purposes - one of whom subsequently abruptly, totally, and permanently parted ways for reasons we muppets weren't made privy to.
Not yet.
Still, after over five years, not "yet".
The HGAA's early problems arose because different people wanted to take the organization in different directions.
The HGAA's early problems arose because Bob had no problem with aligning himself with a lying scummy total sleazebag and trusting him with ultimate full control. And I would submit that at an absolute minimum that was fifty times the magnitude of an error of judgment which could be dismissed as forgivable.
...different people wanted to take the organization in different directions.
The only direction the only person with a vote that counted took it was straight down to impact.
That created power stuggles...
What "stuggles"? Ivory poacher with a helicopter and an AK-47. Is there a struggle?
...which cost the HGAA some of its early leadership.
It never had any leadership. It had a dictatorship - just like the one you've got now.
For now...
...and the next five years plus without a glimmer of hope anywhere in sight...
...I'm going to take the US Hawks in the direction that I believe is right.
No shit. Emperor Bob is gonna take the US Hawks, which is essentially Emperor Bob and Emperor Bob alone, in the direction Emperor Bob BELIEVES is right. And if anybody's REALITY conflicts with any of Emperor Bob's BELIEFS then that muppet can go fuck himself.
If people want to go along, then they're welcome. If not, there are at least two other alternatives. :)
Just the kind of people you really need to create a superior alternate national hang gliding association - people who WANT to "GO ALONG". u$hPa pretty much cornered that market decade ago. It's absolutely OOZING with useless pigfuckers who want NOTHING OTHER THAN to "GO ALONG". That's EXACTLY what all the u$hPa Board members who voted unanimously for your expulsion were doing. Hang gliding is just a question of which faction you wanna GO ALONG with. Perish the thought that you don't care to just GO ALONG with ANYBODY. Live by people who wanna go along...

Kite Strings was founded because of what a couple of people KNEW was RIGHT - not because of anybody's idiot fucking BELIEFS. I don't want any people who want to "GO ALONG" with anything or anybody anywhere near this site. God's already given them u$hPa, the Jack and Davis Shows, all the club rags, the hang check, the foot landing. I want everything posted here to be carefully scrutinized and challenged to the hilt if it's wrong or believed to be wrong. That's about the only way this forum and the people in it get better.

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=881
Davis Straub; Idiot Statist, Endless Wars & Tyranny
Warren Narron - 2015/02/08 00:52:29 UTC

New Rule: Oath of Fealty?

The Hawks has no product. There is no there, there.
Your forum is boring. And about the only times it's NOT boring is when you're at least partially in the right and really NOT going along.

But you shot yourself in the foot on Day One. You asked for a bunch of ass kissers to join a cult and that's just about all you've got.

What you SHOULD've done was the precise opposite - encourage your most hated enemies to join, retain control of the forum to prevent the kinda bullshit that Jack and Davis pull, and tear them to shreds in open public debate. Then use what emerges from the ashes to found something BETTER than u$hPa.

That's pretty much what happens here. This is an academic classroom and I won't tolerate snake oil salesmen as members 'cause establishing an alternate to u$hPa ain't the mission but it's quotes from snake oil salesmen that constitute about ninety percent of the bandwidth here and WE HAVE destroyed a lot of them.

And the more things go to hell under Tim Herr, Rich Hass, Mark G. Forbes, Davis, Jack the more credibility we gain.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2068
Leaving the US Hawks
Steve Corbin - 2015/09/10 05:21:11 UTC

From personal experience, I know how tough it can be to be a loser. Your leaving is a losing experience for you, and someday you'll wake up, realizing what a loser you are.
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=881
Davis Straub; Idiot Statist, Endless Wars & Tyranny
Warren Narron - 2015/02/08 00:52:29 UTC

The Hawks has no product. There is no there, there.
I'm not apologizing for Bob. I love him...
The fundamental prerequisite for being a Bob Show member in good standing.
...and yet I can empathize with those that have trouble dealing with powerful personalities.
And if you check the LEGITIMATE element of the Mission Statement...

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/faq.php
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a Board of Directors for the US Hawks?
Not yet. The HGAA's early problems arose because different people wanted to take the organization in different directions. That created power stuggles which cost the HGAA some of its early leadership. For now, I'm going to take the US Hawks in the direction that I believe is right. If people want to go along, then they're welcome. If not, there are at least two other alternatives. :)
...The Bob Show is nothing BUT having to deal with Emperor Bob's powerful personality. Love Bob or leave The Bob Show.
It ain't easy going against the grain...
Absolutely fatal if you go against the Bob grain.
...that's why I respect Bob so much.
But have total contempt for T** at K*** S******. Ya don't wanna go nuts with this going-against-the-grain thing.
I have pity for those not strong enough to stick this one out...
...and total contempt for those strong enough to stand up to Bob and have their wires cut.
...as I truly believe in this cause.
Exactly what is this cause and how is it manifesting itself?
I only regret not being smart enough to make a strong contribution.
You're good. A smart person making a strong contribution is the LAST thing Emperor Bob wants.
But a contribution, even a weak one, is better than never having tried at all.
A contribution to WHAT? An alternate hang gliding association even more abusive than u$hPa?
Reconsider. You can contribute something, and letting a petty personality conflict...
What's your source on this being an issue of a petty personality conflict?
...get in your way is not just a loss for you, but a loss for the rest of us as well.
Yeah Steve, the rest of "US". "US" being the sycophants willing to kiss Emperor Bob's ass nonstop and let him slide completely unchallenged whenever he feels like making The Bob Show a safe place for people of varying ages to visit.
We need you.
Yeah, "WE" sure needed him - and his uncountable contributions to the reform of this sport.
Please help, it's important to you and us...
Fuck "US", Steve.
Steve Corbin - 2015/09/10 05:32:01 UTC

I want to re-interpret the term "loser", as I don't intend it as an insult, but rather as a term indicating the condition of having lost something of value.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa4TQIzM3hE
dead

Listen to the lyrics. He's not claiming to be a "loser" in the usual sense, but instead is admitting that he's lost something of value to him.

You can only lose by leaving the Hawks.
How 'bout Terry Mason? My feeling is that he lost pretty bigtime by staying.
And your loss is a loss to the rest of us, a loss we can ill afford.
How 'bout Peter Birren - the greatest thing to hit hang glider towing since the Infallible Weak Link? Last post: 2013/12/06 21:33:37 UTC. How come nobody's begging him to come back in from the cold and continue his efforts to help Bob build a better alternate national hang gliding association?
Please don't allow a simple personality conflict get between you and a worthy cause.
I wanna hear what this personality conflict was. How can the people who wanna help bring this valuable individual back into the fold possibly be of any use if they have no idea what the problem is about?
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/09/10 06:15:03 UTC

The Beatles ... my how time has flown.

Thanks very much for your kind words Steve.

Here's my theory of the US Hawks ... and people in general.

People have many many dimensions in their personalities.
And Bob's job as Emperor For Life is to nose into as many dimensions as possible and determine which people are acceptable hang glider pilots and which need to be banned to make The Bob Show a safe place for people of varying ages to visit.
Each dimension has its own distribution with most folks clustered around the middle and fewer people distributed at both ends.
Total dregs like Sam Kellner at the left end, Steve Corbin types in the middle, and, at the right end...
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/11 18:16:54 UTC

Hi Tad,

I just wanted to offer a general thanks for all of the information that you capture and preserve on your site. I find it to be a helpful reference when all else fails.
If there were just one dimension, it wouldn't be too hard to find people aligned with you almost anywhere along that line. But with dozens (or hundreds?!) of dimensions, it gets harder and harder to find people who agree with you on all of them ... especially if you move out toward the fringe.
So Scott's a fringer?
We're all hang glider pilots...
I'd say practically none of you are. When you and Bill can blather away on your rag about stalls being benign and hear nothing but cricket chirps during the pauses I'd say you're organization is totally devoid of anything that could be considered a pilot.
...and that certainly puts us out on the far end of one of those dimensions.
Nah. Pretty mainstream from everything I've seen.
Many among us (including Scott) are highly intelligent and highly individualistic.
No and yes.
That's out there on another fringe of that distribution. Many of us are also not happy with the mainstream direction that USHPA has gone.
Really? Y'all seem to be doing exactly the same sortsa things u$hPa is.
That puts us out in another fringe group.
I dunno... Rabid hostility to compliance with hook-in check requirement, feeling that the BIG DEAL Tad makes about the differences between bent and straight pin releases is somewhat overblown, Rooney Link pops are mere inconveniences which increase the safety of the towing operation, better control authority upright, Sam Kellner, safe place for people of varying ages to visit, like other organizations doesn't give a flying fuck about the free speech of its members...
Now if you throw in things like politics (left and right)...
Preferably far right...
...religion (many to choose from)...
Just make sure you choose one - something that recognizes queers as subhuman.
...and a million other little differences (paper or plastic...
Plastic fer sure. We only give rats' asses about US hawks as logos.
...Beatles or Bob Dylan, Ginger or Maryann) then it's really very very unlikely that we'll be able to find enough of us to actually accomplish the goal of building a new hang gliding association.
And we're certainly not gonna use Newtonian physics as a core value 'cause that's extremely disrespectful of individual hang gliding opinions.
That's why I generally try not to bring up too much about religion or politics or anything else because it's just not helpful to us coming together to accomplish the monumental task before us.
1. But it's EXTREMELY helpful when we wanna make The Bob Show a safe place for people of varying ages to visit.

2. The monumental task of turning a five year plus dictatorship into something in which another individual or two has some measure of actual control.

3. Unless I wanna silence Tad. Then I try to bring up as much as possible about "anything else" having absolutely nothing to do with anything relevant to hang gliding.

4. Hang gliding has always been operated as a religious cult. It's always been controlled by control freaks - big surprise - and they all understand that treating it as a religion is their best path to keeping themselves in those positions of control.
If the US Hawks is going to survive...
It's gonna survive as long as you do - as long as there's no actual there there.
...we're going to have to realize that we're all very different...
That's OK. We all have Emperor Bob making all of our decisions for us.
...and maybe don't agree with each other on a lot of things.
Everybody agrees on the core issue - love Bob or leave him.
If we're going to work together, we're going to have to ignore all those glaring differences and focus...
Are you gonna have little red rubber FOCUSED PILOT wristbands like u$hPa does? I think those would help a lot.
...on our...
Bob's.
...common goals.
Goal.
That's our only hope.
And thus it's our sacred duty to, if we see something that's not being done correctly, shut the fuck up, let it slide, cooperate and compromise with all the other Bob Show Dedicated Sycophants.
Unfortunately, there are many out there who want to torpedo our efforts...
Yeah, like...
Zack C - 2011/12/17 14:56:03 UTC

I don't know whether you were genuinely doing what you felt was the right thing to do or just looking for convenient justification to finally can Tad, but I believe your actions were inappropriate and set a terrible precedent for your organization.
...Zack C fer instance.
...and that makes it all that much more difficult.
Oh. So THAT's why it's gone nowhere but backwards in over five years.
Steve, I've been reading your posts on other forums, and I really appreciate that you understand what we're trying to accomplish.
Steve, could you explain to me what we're trying to accomplish? I'm totally confused on the issue. It seems that every point in the Mission Statement is flatly contradicted by another point in the Mission Statement and that Emperor Bob's conduct is all over the fuckin' map.
Whether we ever get there or not...
Lessee... Five years (plus a month today) - zero progress. Let's do the math and see what we should be expecting at the ten year point.
...it's great to have met and worked with...
Over.
...so many great people along the way.
C'mon, say something nice about Sam too.
Scott is certainly included in that list...
So great that he determined he wouldn't participate in The Bob Show until after Emperor Bob banned Tad, and a little later determined he wouldn't participate as long as Bob did. Not some slut like Tad willing to participate regardless of the number of dickheads splashing around in the sewer. (Target rich environment.)
...and I hope he'll consider rejoining us when it feels right for him.
Try resigning. Maybe that'll help.
I hope your words have helped him in that direction. Image
Why?

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/faq.php
Frequently Asked Questions
For now, I'm going to take the US Hawks in the direction that I believe is right. If people want to go along, then they're welcome. If not, there are at least two other alternatives. :)
He obviously doesn't like the direction Emperor Bob is taking the Bob Show so what other option does he have under the Mission Statement?

Or, if you believe THIS element of the Mission Statement:
What will keep the US Hawks from becoming another USHPA or HGAA?
You will ... hopefully. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Everyone has to do their part once in a while. If you see something that's not being done correctly, then it's your duty to speak out.
Of what value is a member who places no value on freedom, won't do his part, shirks his duty to speak out against what he's seeing done incorrectly even as he terminates his membership? He's placing Bob on exactly the same level as an unrepentant child molester who makes The Bob Show a dangerous place for people of varying ages to visit yet feels no obligation whatsoever to voice his concerns to the membership - and this after fighting for Bob tooth and nail under his real and a fake identities on The Davis Show.

For that matter what does anybody want with Emperor Bob on The Bob Show? Apparently the problem is that Scott has the hots for Ginger while Bob's obsessed with Mary Ann. So how come Bob hasn't just publicly addressed this point of contention and made and documented why Ginger is the Mark G. Forbes of Gilligan's Island?

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=929
Training Manual Comments / Contribution
Bob Kuczewski - 2012/01/07 17:59:55 UTC

I'm looking for people who can work together to build an on-line training manual for hang gliding. Yes, that does require a certain amount of agreeability and willingness to compromise. The only Training Manual that Tad can build is the one where he has 100% control.
Guess that requirement of a certain amount of agreeability and willingness to compromise only applies to the non Bob members of The Bob Show.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=44009
Why there isn't any growth in hang gliding
Mark G. Forbes - 2015/09/15 06:51:01 UTC

Joe, please give the whole divisiveness thing a rest, ok? It's tedious, and you're not convincing anyone that it's a good idea. That's because it's a really bad idea, and what's more it's completely contrary to USHPA's stated purpose since the very beginning of our sport.

From our original articles of incorporation, back in 1974:
B. The purposes for which this corporation is formed are:
1. The specific and primary purposes are to engage exclusively for scientific and educational purposes in the development, study, and use of fuel-less flight systems and aircraft capable of being launched by human power alone, to make knowledge relating to these subjects available for the advancement of such scientific and educational purposes, to organize meets where the testing and flying of such systems and aircraft will be encouraged, to conduct generally a scientific and educational study and research of the design, construction and operation of such systems and aircraft, and to foster the future development of such science and flight.
Great! So how y'all coming on the:
To conduct generally a scientific and educational study and research of the design, construction and operation of such systems and aircraft, and to foster the future development of such science and flight.
part? How come the better part of five years ago one of your Hang Threes...
Zack C - 2010/11/23 05:23:34 UTC

In September of 2010, hang gliding safety activist Tad Eareckson entered a discussion on the Houston Hang Gliding & Paragliding Association's discussion group that would result in his being banned from the group within two months. But despite the controversy over Tad's 'arrogance' and 'condescending tone,' I was impressed by his knowledge, logic, and respect for science, which included a great deal of his own research and experimentation. My attempts to carry out a rational discussion with him were continually sabotaged and eventually aborted by other group members, many with little interest in or comprehension of the discussion.

I wished to continue the discussion, and I knew others in the group were interested in it as well. But Tad had been banned from every group he entered to date, so we needed a place of our own where knowledge was prized over personality. And thus the idea for Kite Strings was born.

The purpose of Kite Strings is to foster serious discussion regarding the practices and technologies of modern hang gliding. This is a forum ruled by science, truth, facts, reason, and logic. Anyone with a respect for these principles and a willingness to learn and engage in rational discussion is welcome to participate.
...found it necessary to found Kite Strings in order to have a snowball's chance in hell of making any progress along those lines?
Nowhere in there do I see anything about "hang gliding".
Cool. That must make the job of the United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association - formerly the United States Hang Gliding Association - a lot easier.
It speaks of aircraft, in the sense of craft capable of flight...
Are hang gliders capable of flight? If the answer is yes than so are flying squirrels. We're both capable of sustaining flight when and only if we're in air going up as fast or faster than we're going down through it.
...which are launched by human power alone.
Which are "CAPABLE OF BEING launched by human power alone". So what's that mean?

The only fuel-less aircraft that can be launched off of flat ground is the Gossamer Condor. We need the power of gravity and a drop-off to get a sled run and a drop-off plus the power of air moving up for sustained flight.

I could drain the fuel tank on a Cessna 152 parked on the top of an open knoll on a high ridge with a strong wind coming in, hop in the cockpit, and have a couple guys on the struts shove it forward. Or I could rig a bungee launch system I could pre human power all by myself. Then I could soar until I got bored and top land. That work?
A kiteboard is not an aircraft; it is capable of briefly lifting someone into the air, but it does not sustain flight.
Sustains flight a lot better than a lot of those ground skimmer contraptions from the early Seventies did. And I'm pretty sure that a few people have had flights involuntarily sustained long enough to take them onto the shore and kill them.
Wingsuits might conceivably be considered "aircraft" and if they someday evolve to the point where they're capable of being foot launched and landed without the aid of a parachute, perhaps we'll have to review whether they fall within our purview.
It's been done. They're capable of being foot launched off a mountain or out of a chopper and...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEP8juRSBRo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRB-woVjlFY


...landed without the aid of a parachute. And that guy did a lot better than Joe Julik did at Whitewater a year plus two weeks ago or Kenny...

16-35818
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/303/20486350282_713fbffc3f_o.png
Image
Image
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/420/20501439261_d44a6b31f3_o.png
26-41615

...did in Ontario at the beginning of last month. So what are we waiting for?
We're not required to include such craft...
So? You violate the crap outta internal SOPs and FAA regulations requiring you to do and not do shit any time you feel like it.
...but our sport evolves and changes over the years.
Pretty much always backwards - thanks to scum like Tim Herr and you.
Who knows what new developments may emerge as materials science progresses?
I'm guessing if skydiving comes out with an even more bent parachute pin Quallaby will come out within a week with a new and improved pro toad release it'll make mandatory for use at its operations.
But for now, they're not something we want to be involved in...
We are? I want a wingsuit division with the rating system dependent on the more advanced pilots hitting shorter and shallower cardboard box runways. My vote doesn't count?
...and the numbers are so small that they're insignificant.
And this differs from hang gliding how?
Furthermore, they don't use the sites where we fly...
They can't do Glacier and Makapu'u? We can't aerotow them with extra appropriate weak links with finished lengths of 1.5 inches or less until they've been at an around all this plenty long enough to understand what's what and who's who?
...and coordination between all users of those sites is one good reason to include them.
Just expel the users you can't properly coordinate.
When USHPA adopted paragliding as a part of our sport organization, back in the late 1980's, that was a key reason.

Dividing USHPA up into tiny fiefdoms does nobody any good.
Nah. Really hard to beat a corrupt monopoly with everything controlled by a corporate lawyer.
It diminishes what little influence we already have on public policy, dramatically raises costs per member...
What was the cost of participation for Jeremiah Thompson?
...and accomplishes nothing of benefit to our members or our sport.
And when you've gone to so much trouble to do stuff like suppressing as much relevant information as humanly possible on the Kelly Harrison / Arys Moorhead twofer.
It may make YOU feel good, but you're not even a member of USHPA so I don't quite see why we should change our structure to suit you.
Yeah, asshole. u$hPa's all about changing its structure to suit Tim Herr and the tandem thrill ride industry.
It's a bit weird that you have such heartfelt opinions about how we should run our organization. Why don't you go worry about your "World Hang Gliding Association", or whatever you're calling it these days, and let USHPA worry about itself?
Yeah Joe. Back off. T** at K*** S****** is working his ass off to give u$hPa as much stuff to worry about as possible.
If you offer a vastly better service, members will flock to your group and abandon USHPA.
Yeah...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Kinsley Sykes - 2011/08/31 11:35:36 UTC

Well actually he didn't. But if you don't want to listen to the folks that actually know what they are talking about, go ahead.
Feel free to go the the tow park that Tad runs...
As for as weak links are concerned anyway, everyone and his dog suddenly flocked to the tow park Tad runs.
That gives you exactly what you want; an organization tailored to meet your exacting standards of exclusion...
Versus u$hPa's exacting standards of exclusion which are whatever the fuck it feels like calling acting against the best interests of the corporation.
...and you get stick a thumb in the eye of all of us who think your ideas are ludicrous.
Coming from the motherfuckers who published fourteen pages of Aerotow Industry crap about magic fishing line three years ago and seven months before it splattered one of their tandem thrill ride industry drivers.
Go forth and succeed! Your superior offerings will inspire USHPA to do better, to the benefit of all pilots across the country.
Nah. What superior offerings invariably do is inspire u$hPa to do worse. And that isn't a sustainable model, Mark.
Meanwhile it's my job, and the job of the other volunteers on our board, to run our association prudently and deal with the world as it exists and not as we imagine it should be.
A world in which towlines transmit pressure and low level whipstalls are inconveniences which increase the safety of towing operations.
In the real world, the Forest Service has insurance requirements, as do many other state and local agencies as well as private landowners. We have to work with FAA on airspace issues...
You do that just fine. You murder an eleven year old kid, the FAA investigates and discovers that the aircraft didn't have a tail number and hands the investigation back over to the murderers.
...UAVs, the implementation of ADS-B and NexGen, FCC on radio communications...
Yeah, that's a real biggie. Couple of business band frequencies that are totally unusable by hang gliders.
...the occasional legislator on proposed laws...
...the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department when you've violated the crap out of existing ones and need some bodies quietly and neatly disposed of...
...and so on. Despite your desire for a simpler and freer time, it's not 1970 any more. Sorry about that. The hippies have grown up and gotten real jobs, and most of them have retired by now.
The ones who didn't run off cliffs without their gliders because their u$hPa instructors taught them that a hook-in check gives a false sense of security anyway.
If you want to re-create a structure that fits with your world-view, go for it! Put your efforts into that, and we'll see which organization succeeds and thrives.
We're not ever gonna be able to kill you, Mark. We let you get too entrenched for that to be able to happen. But we are gonna splinter off and do what we can to make your lives as miserable as possible. And that's working. If it weren't you wouldn't be posting.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=44009
Why there isn't any growth in hang gliding
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/09/15 07:49:31 UTC

Excuse me Mark, but Joe seems to be doing exactly what you've suggested. He's advocating for pilots to choose a different path.

Yet despite your "urging" for him to do that, it's clear that the real purpose of your post is to shut him up. Furthermore, your "go forth and succeed" message conflicts with your own vote to expel me for daring to start an alternative to USHPA (explicitly listed among the reasons for my expulsion).

Similarly, your arguments supporting USHPA's monopoly are faulty. Look at the sport of SCUBA diving where several large organizations provide both certification and lobbying. Multiple SCUBA organizations have bolstered their sport through competition and innovation.

Do you wonder why people have a hard time believing you?
Which people?
You're the personification of everything that's wrong with USHPA.

Now go twist Davis's arm so he'll ban me to give you a safe zone to spread your propaganda.
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1701
Complaints about Tad
Rick Masters - 2015/01/16 18:59:15 UTC

He has concerns about people trying to muck up the forum, but he has also dealt effectively with Tad.
Davis, if I just wanted to READ the Oz Forum, I could do that via Kitestings.org.
1. Kite Stings... Not a bad alternate title for the "instructors and other qualified pilot fiends" thread.
2. You could also do that if you weren't too fuckin' moral to use a fake ID.
I come here to share what I know about USHPA for the betterment of hang gliding.
And you couldn't do that on your forum? You respond to Mark on the Davis Show he gets hits and relevance you could be scoring on The Bob Show.
There has been no reason to silence me other than to give Forbes and Hass an unchallenged venue to spread their one-sided views. I ask that I be allowed to let pilots see the other side. Thanks.
More pilots would be able to see the other side if you posted on The Bob Show.
Jim Rooney - 2015/09/15 13:58:03 UTC

Hi Kai.
You're absolutely right.

I work on both sides of that fence...
As do many other prostitutes.
...and yeah, many of the issues are very similar.
No shortage of total fucking assholes for either flavor.
The two sports after all are very similar.
Too bad you can't use your tug pilot skills and expertise to do for them what you've done for us.
So the question is as you quite correctly put it... what's different?
There's nobody in paragliding good enough to be able to pro tow?
A challenge of asking that question is it seems a bit too easy to go down the path of turning it into a contest... to see it as "One VS the other"!
If we can avoid that temptation however, it can be quite useful.
Anywhere near as useful as the Rooney Link used to be to the safety of hang glider aerotowing.
It can perhaps show us where HG can improve it's ways.
The Press - 2006/03/15

The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) is urgently pushing for new hang-gliding industry standards after learning a hang-gliding pilot who suffered serious injuries in a crash three weeks ago had not clipped himself on to the glider.

Extreme Air tandem gliding pilot James (Jim) Rooney safely clipped his passenger into the glider before departing from the Coronet Peak launch site, near Queenstown, CAA sports and recreation manager Rex Kenny said yesterday.

However, he took off without attaching himself.

In a video, he was seen to hold on to the glider for about fifty meters before hitting power lines.

Rooney and the passenger fell about fifteen meters to the ground.
New and better hang gliding industry standards?
So perhaps for example when we point out that in PG, it's easier to get from knowing nothing to getting into the air...
What's it like to strap into a Dragonfly, hook up a hang glider, and instantly know everything about everything?
...this maybe doesn't tell us that people are lazy or attention deprived, but perhaps that the initial steps into HG are for lack of a better word, a pain in the ass.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/28 19:39:17 UTC

Weak links break for all kinds of reasons.
Some obvious, some not.

The general consensus is the age old adage... "err on the side of caution".

The frustration of a weaklink break is just that, frustration.
And it can be very frustrating for sure. Especially on a good day, which they tend to be. It seems to be a Murphy favourite. You'll be in a long tug line on a stellar day just itching to fly. The stars are all lining up when *bam*, out of nowhere your trip to happy XC land goes up in a flash. Now you've got to hike it all the way back to the back of the line and wait as the "perfect" window drifts on by.

I get it.
It can be a pisser.

But the "other side"... the not cautions one... is not one of frustration, it's one of very real danger.
Better to be frustrated than in a hospital, or worse.
No exaggeration... this is the fire that the "other side" is made of. Best not to play with it.
There's one major pain in the ass we're never again gonna see in the sport in the US.
Maybe then we might focus on making the early days of HG less of a pain?
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22308
Better mouse trap(release)?
Jim Rooney - 2010/12/16 18:47:05 UTC

Oh, I've heard the "everything we do is an experiment" line before.
The trouble is, it's not.

I've seen experimentation with towing gear more than anything else in HG.
I've not seen many go out and try to build their own sails for example. When someone does, they're very quickly "shown the light" by the community. Example... the guy that was building the PVC glider in California somewhere.
But for some reason, towing gear is exempt from this.

The difference is what we do has been done by thousands of people already. It's been tested... a lot.
What we do is free of the experimentation part.
It's still dangerous, but not at the level of building new gear is. Not even close.

That's what people fail to realize.
It's no small difference. It's a huge chasm.

Notice how I'm not saying to not do it.
Go forth and experiment. That's great... that's how we improve things.
I'm just warning you of that chasm.

A few years ago, I started refusing to tow people with home made gear.
I like the idea of improving gear, but the lack of appreciation for the world they were stepping into didn't sit with me.
For example... flying with the new gear in mid day conditions?
Are you kidding me????

Approach it for what it is... completely untested and very experimental gear which will likely fail in new and unforseen ways as it tries it's damndest to kill you... and then we can talk.
Let's stop those people going out and trying to build their own sails. And that guy that was building the PVC glider in California somewhere.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bRrpHNa68iY/UQ6Pv9gRZyI/AAAAAAAAjTg/Hc22bx5122Q/s2048/20943781_BG1.jpg
Image

And fuck all that homemade gear.
This path of denigrating the students isn't really working out that well, yet it's so common in HG.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 04:55:25 UTC

Ditto dude.

It always amazes to hear know it all pilots arguing with the professional pilots.
I mean seriously, this is our job.
We do more tows in a day than they do in a month (year for most).

We *might* have an idea of how this stuff works.
They *might* do well to listen.
Not that they will, mind you... cuz they *know*.

I mean seriously... ridgerodent's going to inform me as to what Kroop has to say on this? Seriously? Steve's a good friend of mine. I've worked at Quest with him. We've had this discussion ... IN PERSON. And many other ones that get misunderstood by the general public. It's laughable.

Don't even get me started on Tad. That obnoxious blow hard has gotten himself banned from every flying site that he used to visit... he doesn't fly anymore... because he has no where to fly. His theories were annoying at best and downright dangerous most of the time. Good riddance.

So, argue all you like.
I don't care.
I've been through all these arguments a million times... this is my job.
I could be more political about it, but screw it... I'm not in the mood to put up with tender sensibilities... Some weekend warrior isn't about to inform me about jack sh*t when it comes to towing. I've got thousands upon thousands of tows under my belt. I don't know everything, but I'll wager the house that I've got it sussed a bit better than an armchair warrior.
But the main idea here is that maybe looking at the "problem" from a different angle could help.
Why?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 21:40:25 UTC

Tommy.
First, I sent Steve a bunch of info offline. Hopefully it clears things up a bit for him.
Unfortunately, he's stumbled onto some of Tad's old rantings and got suckered in. So most of this was just the same old story of debunking Tad's lunacy... again .

See, the thing is... "we", the people that work at and run aerotow parks, have a long track record.
This stuff isn't new, and has been slowly refined over decades.
We have done quite literally hundreds of thousands of tows.
We know what we're doing.

Sure "there's always room for improvement", but you have to realize the depth of experience you're dealing with here.
There isn't going to be some "oh gee, why didn't I think of that?" moment. The obvious answers have already been explored... at length.

Anyway...
Weaklink material... exactly what Davis said.

It's no mystery.
It's only a mystery why people choose to reinvent the wheel when we've got a proven system that works.
I thought we had a proven system that worked, was slowly refined over decades, had a huge track record.
The more we look at it as "Us VS Them", the more we will fail.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/11 19:22:18 UTC

Of course not... it's Asshole-ese.

Sorry, I'm sick and tired of all these soap box bullshit assheads that feel the need to spout their shit at funerals. I just buried my friend and you're seizing the moment to preach your bullshit? GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!!!!!!

I can barely stand these pompus asswipes on a normal day.
Now let's all hold hands and sing Kumbaya.
We have an opportunity to view things as here's someone showing us a path that works.
Oh good. Another one.

C'mon dickhead. Say something about Tad's lunacy and hole in the ground.

Hey Bob... This guy seems to have a lot of really solid ideas and Tad makes his skin crawl. Why don't you try to get him onboard?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=44009
Why there isn't any growth in hang gliding
Mark G. Forbes - 2015/09/15 06:51:01 UTC

Joe, please give the whole divisiveness thing a rest, ok? It's tedious, and you're not convincing anyone that it's a good idea. That's because it's a really bad idea, and what's more it's completely contrary to USHPA's stated purpose since the very beginning of our sport.

From our original articles of incorporation, back in 1974:
B. The purposes for which this corporation is formed are:
1. The specific and primary purposes are to engage exclusively for scientific and educational purposes in the development, study, and use of fuel-less flight systems and aircraft capable of being launched by human power alone, to make knowledge relating to these subjects available for the advancement of such scientific and educational purposes, to organize meets where the testing and flying of such systems and aircraft will be encouraged, to conduct generally a scientific and educational study and research of the design, construction and operation of such systems and aircraft, and to foster the future development of such science and flight.
Hey Mark... Explain to me how THIS:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25321
Stop the Stupids at the USHPA BOD meeting
Mark G. Forbes - 2011/09/29 02:26:23 UTC

We can establish rules which we think will improve pilot safety, but our attorney is right. USHPA is not in the business of keeping pilots "safe" and it can't be.
is not a total betrayal of those founding principles you just quoted. You're gonna do all this science and education to advance the technology and airmanship of this particular branch of aviation but it's of no importance whatsoever whether or not the pilot survives the launch, flight, and landing?

And why don't you tell me about all the scientific advancement you assholes have been fostering and infusing into the culture?

Any chance you can tell us what an appropriate weak link is and what it's supposed to be doing for us? We've been working on that one for over 34 years and all we've achieved is one that never does anything useful and no widely acknowledged positions on what its actual function is.

Now we've got universal 200 pound fishing line on any bridle end on any solo glider. That's a small fraction of what any glider can easily handle as far as load is concerned and it sure as hell doesn't do shit to keep the glider from getting fatally out of control.

How many more decades do ya think it's gonna take to advance the science to the point at which you'll be able to give us a straight answer?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=44151
Mark's org:
Joe Faust
2015/09/15 22:01:11 UTC

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=44009
Why there isn't any growth in hang gliding
Kai-Martin Knaak
2015/09/15 22:04:28 UTC

Tad Eareckson
2015/09/15 22:18:31 UTC

We all had the about similar ideas about what could constitute a relevant aircraft and posted in three different threads within a span of seventeen minutes and twenty seconds. (Damn. Yours Truly came in distinctly last.)

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=44009
Why there isn't any growth in hang gliding
Mark G. Forbes - 2015/09/15 22:34:50 UTC

You illustrate a good point; it's difficult to draw a bright-line boundary around exactly what "hang gliding" and "paragliding" is. As Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart wrote long ago in Jacobellis v. Ohio, "I know it when I see it". Making those distinctions is why we have a board of directors drawn from members across the country.
Total fucking assholes elected from and by a base of total fucking assholes.
As the technology evolves, so does our perception of what our sport encompasses. At present, our perception of what "it" is, doesn't include parasailing, kiteboarding or wingsuits.
Or sane, safe, and legal hang glider aerotowing.
It does include paragliding, flexwings, rigid wings, caged wings and ultralight foot-launched sailplanes. There are edge cases where it's up to individual circumstances.

Our sport has many facets...
Way too few in desirable aspects, up to its neck in the shit.
...and we on the BOD think that it's good to be inclusive of all the diverse aspects of foot-launched flight.
And, make no mistake, we on the BOD will enforce our concept of inclusiveness with an expulsion hearing in a New York minute.
Some may disagree with that; if so, we have elections for regional directors and you can run for the position and make your argument that we're doing it all wrong.
I prefer to work from here - if it's all the same to you.

Keep picking and choosing, Mark. Include the aircraft flavor that was not foreseen, obviously couldn't have been understood, and probably wasn't intended by those authors over four decades ago and totally demolish the other three quarters which was very obviously, clearly, unambiguously intended.
---
Edit - 2015/09/16 15:55:00 UTC

And so very fundamental to an aviation organization and fervently desired by the membership.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Oops. Copied and pasted the wrong time stamp. Should've been 2015/09/15 17:31:52 UTC. So I actually scooped them by about four and a half hours.

Joe...
Tad Eareckson - 2015/09/15 17:31:52 UTC

I could drain the fuel tank on a Cessna 152 parked on the top of an open knoll on a high ridge with a strong wind coming in, hop in the cockpit, and have a couple guys on the struts shove it forward. Or I could rig a bungee launch system I could pre human power all by myself. Then I could soar until I got bored and top land. That work?
Joe Faust - 2015/09/15 22:01:11 UTC

Piper Cub, engine off, no fuel, launched off cliff by a large team of humans powering the movement of the aircraft off the cliff.
Piper Cub, engine off, no fuel...
If there's no fuel just how important is it to switch the engine off?
...launched off cliff by a large team of humans...
A large team of humans? A couple guys on the struts wouldn't work?
...powering the movement of the aircraft off the cliff.
1. They’ve gotta power the movement of the aircraft off the cliff? They can't just shove it forward?

2. It's gotta be "powering the movement of the aircraft"? We don't understand that a Piper Cub is an/the aircraft and can't, if we must, just talk about "its movement"?

3. Powering the movement of the aircraft? What else is the large team of humans gonna power? The electrical system?

4. Oh. We're gonna launch the Piper Cub off cliff by a large team of humans powering the movement of the aircraft off the cliff. As opposed to launching the Piper Cub off cliff by a large team of humans powering the movement of the aircraft off the tennis court.

Never use three words where thirty will do.

What's the purpose? To see how much of the reader's time you can waste and/or how much of a headache you can give him? Sorry, I've got way more amusing options for wasting my time and acquiring headaches. I seldom give your posts more than three second glances 'cause I have no interest in spending forty-five minutes decoding verbose, redundant, pretentious, obfuscatory crap to glean three to six seconds worth of actual substance - if I'm lucky. And I'm guessing I'm not the only glider forum person who monitors what's happening out there and responds in a similar manner.

I know why Dense Pages does this sorta thing. Adds poundage to his books to give the purchaser the illusion that he's actually getting something of value for the thirty bucks he's forking out and conceals the fact that they don't contain anything of any legitimacy, that each paragraph is a flat contradiction of the previous one. It's totally beyond me what your motivation is.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10
Welcome to, and policies of, the Oz Report discussion group
Davis Straub - 2003/03/04 02:07:45 UTC

I encourage quality posts, posts that actually help the reader and would be of interest to the readers. I discourage drivel, nonsense and lazy, just hanging around, here-I-am-with-nothing-really-much-to say posts. There are other sites that encourage such behavior, this is not one of them.

The Oz Report forum is not a campfire. It is not a place to hang out with your bud and have a beer while slurring your words. It is a serious forum for pilots who wish to write cogently and engage the intellect of others.
Yeah...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=44009
Why there isn't any growth in hang gliding
Bille Floyd - 2015/09/16 15:10:56 UTC

2010
Wasn't that somewhere About the same time you got booted off your elected seat, as a representative for the USHPA ?

Why did that Happen ?

Why should i listen to someone that obviously can NOT get along with other people, who have a different opinion about subject-matter, than yours ?
Right.

http://farm1.staticflickr.com/358/18796960282_f659ffd44e_o.jpg
Image
http://ozreport.com/forum/files/copy_2_of_imgp1239_197.jpg
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7220/13949046702_ccfa0fafab_o.png
Image
http://www.thekiteboarder.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/opener-532x800.jpg

I shudder to think what The Davis Show would be like if it WEREN'T a serious forum for pilots who wish to write cogently and engage the intellect of others.

Here's the mission statement for Kite Strings, Davis:
Zack C - 2010/11/23 05:23:34 UTC

The purpose of Kite Strings is to foster serious discussion regarding the practices and technologies of modern hang gliding. This is a forum ruled by science, truth, facts, reason, and logic. Anyone with a respect for these principles and a willingness to learn and engage in rational discussion is welcome to participate.
It actually DOES that. And it's the only English speaking - AT LEAST - glider forum on the planet that actually DOES that. And assholes WITHOUT a respect for those principles and a willingness to learn and engage in rational discussion are NOT welcome to participate and get their wires cut on the rare occasions when they get in and are subsequently so identified or confirmed.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=2104
Banned from Oz ... again
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/09/17 07:09:19 UTC

I suppose it was inevitable ...
The OzReport
World Wide Hang Gliding Discussion Group

You have been banned from this forum. We have software in place which is designed to keep out spambots and sometimes it gets a little overzealous, and if it's come down on you for no reason then we apologize for the inconvenience.

If you don't think that you've done anything to warrant being banned, please contact the webmaster or board administrator with a brief explanation. Please quote the following so that we can reactivate your account:

ID: 7066
name: Bob Hawk
time: 2015-09-17 02:56:26
ban id: 26366 U
OzReport.com
DavisStraub.com
Duh. What did you expect? The Davis Show - like The Jack Show - is a dregs sanctuary. Davis is a parasitic sociopath who never has done and never will do anything that doesn't benefit Davis - at the expense of who the fuck ever. And Davis couldn't give the tiniest flying fuck if the aforementioned expense is multiple lives. Make some some intelligent posts which start moving the sport in a positive direction...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14931
Tad's release (even more)
Freedomspyder - 2009/02/14 17:43:30 UTC

Tad,
I've found your posts on both hook-in checks and releases very interesting and well thought out.
Best of luck dealing with the Oz Report forum cult and its leader.
...they and you will disappear. And the situation in which Bob II was disappeared is IDENTICAL...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=592
Linknife

...to the one in which T** at K*** S****** was. Just swap in Sam Kellner, Jason Dyer, Butch Pritchett, Steve Forslund, Rob Wenban, Marc Fink, Brad Gryder, and Davis Straub for Bille Floyd and Davis Straub.

So tell me what was the last time when you saw something GOOD come out of the Davis Show and what made you think that your push for hang gliding would be the first.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1822
Oz forum
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/17 18:06:42 UTC

Hang gliding pilots being arrested for showing up at a hang gliding site to try to fly their hang glider surely doesn't belong in the "Hang Gliding" section of the Oz Forum!!

Image

Is there any remaining doubt that the sport of hang gliding needs a better outlet for news than through the "Davis Report", "Jack's Living Room", and the "USHPA Iron Curtain"?
It's...
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/11 18:16:54 UTC

Hi Tad,

I just wanted to offer a general thanks for all of the information that you capture and preserve on your site. I find it to be a helpful reference when all else fails.
...got one. The problem is that there aren't a whole lot of people in this idiot sport who really wanna know what the fuck is really going on.
Rick Masters - 2015/07/18 13:33:43 UTC

Matthew 7:6
"Don't throw your pearls to pigs! They will trample the pearls, then turn and attack you."
Coming from one of the top oinkers.
Bill Cummings - 2015/07/18 15:25:12 UTC

SO, couldn't Davis or Scare move the retire Dennis Pagen topic somewhere below Hang Gliding Pilot Arrested for Taking Pictures?
---
At the time we combined HG and PG I knew that the time would come when the grown majority of PG would start removing the pilots that had their roots in HG.

The SOP of the next organization that I belong to must have in place a two thirds or three quarter majority vote to alter the mission statement.
Really Bill? The mission statement you motherfuckers have been living under for the past five years plus is:

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/faq.php
Frequently Asked Questions
For now, I'm going to take the US Hawks in the direction that I believe is right. If people want to go along, then they're welcome. If not, there are at least two other alternatives. :)
Tell me how that's really any better than the Jack and Davis Shows or anywhere as good as u$hPa. Also tell how you managed to be so very comfortable living for the past five years under that SOP if you really desire something from the other end of the spectrum.
Not a popular vote.
Right Bill. The NEXT organization that you belong to. 'Cause we've all seen how the nonexistent SOPs and voting works on The Bob Show. Stated right up front buried in a shitload of bogus ideals.
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/19 04:21:04 UTC
SO, couldn't Davis or Scare move the retire Dennis Pagen topic somewhere below Hang Gliding Pilot Arrested for Taking Pictures?
Davis is the lap dog of USHPA. He only allows US Hawks stuff because he'd lose about 50% of his dwindling active members if he just banned it outright.
Which means, as I've been saying repeatedly, that if you assholes would just stop feeding the megatroll he'd starve to death a whole lot faster.
At the time we combined HG and PG I knew that the time would come when the grown majority of PG would start removing the pilots that had their roots in HG.
You had better foresight than me, Bill.
Then how come you don't turn control of The Bob Show over to Bill?
I was happy that I could fly both wings under one association. If HG and PG had stayed as separate organizations, I'll bet I'd still be flying at least one of my wings at Torrey. Anyone want to guess which one? Image
My home site was an aerotow operation - so I still wouldn't be flying any wings.
The SOP of the next organization that I belong to must have in place a two thirds or three quarter majority vote to alter the mission statement. Not a popular vote.
As a Board member of that next organization, I hope you'll make such a motion for the Board!!! Image
1. And if Emperor Bob likes it Emperor Bob will cast the only vote that counts to pass it.

2. No shit, Bob. Since the current Mission Statement has you in total and sole control from 2010/08/13 through the end of time.

3. So tell me what SOPs you're gonna establish to prevent paragliders from overwhelming the membership list and doing to the US Hawks what they did to u$hPa.
Joe Faust - 2015/09/18 11:45:32 UTC

This is becoming so applicable relative to Oz Report.
Becoming?
I gave some pearls.

Also: Davis permits libel where he chooses and deletes such where he chooses. A severe pending matter is underway ... hoping to avoid the courts by exercising simple private notices to Davis.
Good luck. Maybe you can get Davis to stop being Davis.
What has been coming to mind and heart:
New Era: Publish only in U.S. Hawks forum
And fuck Kite Strings. Don't even bother responding to any points made over there.
Grow good text positively. Link to the positive good text herein.
If you can find any.
May all posters in this forum aim for quality hang gliding posts. Image
Yeah, if you get more posts on the harmlessness of stalls you can totally eliminate them as problems in hang gliding in general - same way they did in aerotowing.
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/09/19 07:47:58 UTC

We sure have some smart folks on this forum!!! Image
Yep.

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=822
US Hawks Hook-In Verification Poll
Bob Kuczewski - 2011/11/07 05:42:59 UTC

Sam, you are quite a genius!!
Totally baffling as to why...

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=881
Davis Straub; Idiot Statist, Endless Wars & Tyranny
Warren Narron - 2015/02/08 01:52:29 UTC

The Hawks has no product. There is no there, there.
...it has no product.
Post Reply