instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

A stomp test only serves to damage airworthy side wires...
As we saw at Funston on 2015/08/23. Rafi did one too many - despite the warnings of his many friends.
EVERYONE does a hook-in check post launch...
09-0919
Image

That one detected the problem pretty definitively.
...a quality release is far too complex for humans to be able to engineer...
The problem with the quality release isn't that it's far too COMPLEX for humans to be able to engineer, it's that it's far too SIMPLE.

Whenever you increase complexity / add components you automatically increase failure rate. The engineering challenge is to design a release with just a single component.

And actually we already have that: the appropriate weak link with the finished length of 1.5 inches or less. It's a proven system that works and has an incredibly long track record. The only real problem with it is that we've recently been having some difficulties agreeing on the definition of "appropriate" - the tow pressure at which we want it to work and what most pilots will be happy with. But we've been making great strides on that issue over the past several years. We're all in agreement that we need to use something a bit heavier than 130 pound Greenspot.
...and two hundred pound weak links easily protect the aircraft against overloading.
Dr. Trisa Tilletti - 2012/06

If tandem operators think that, practically, a 520 lb. double loop weak link is too much for a tandem, it is way too much for a solo pilot.

Solo hang glider pilots should not place a 520 lb. double loop weak link on their V-bridle, unless they get specific approval from the tow operator. It could be hard on the equipment and could be illegal if the tug is using a weaker weak link. It is also far beyond USHPA's nominal 1g recommendation.
Steve Davy
Posts: 1338
Joined: 2011/07/18 10:37:38 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Steve Davy »

Hey all you Jack Asshole forum idiots. Try to guess just how much fun it is for me to witness your implosion.
Your inbred community is a constant source for my enjoyment. Please keep up the great work there. :lol:
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=32899
Man, not again...
Craig Pirazzi - 2015/05/19 00:32:21 UTC

Condolences to those who knew Scott.
I am wondering if those who investigates fatal accidents have experience with Hang Gliding or consult someone in our community? Seems even more important when there is video to analyze.
Here's the best we got on yours, Craig, less than three days after the fact and three months and one week after Scott's:

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=33319
Moab accident, Craig Pirazzi
Rich Jesuroga - 2015/08/27 18:42:17 UTC
Salida

This is very sad indeed. My understanding is that Craig was acting as a site guide for other pilots participating in filming a Utah tourism video. Filming crews were near launch taking video when the accident happened. Craig helped the others off and was the last one to go unassisted. As he walked up to the cliff to launch one wing lifted and turned the glider sideways and he was sucked off the edge by the cliff lee-side rotor. The nose of the glider struck the rock face wall well below the cliff's edge, broke and dropped into the canyon.

While the description above is third hand, it originated from the film crew who witnessed the accident.
And here's what we have now three months and eight days after the fact from the best of the best of those with experience from hang gliding:
Craig Pirazzi - 2015/08/24
Craig Pirazzi (56), an Advanced (H4) pilot and USHPA member since 1986, suffered fatal injuries during a flight at Indian Creek near Moab, UT. The circumstances surrounding the incident are currently still under investigation.
And if there was any video, trust me, it got swallowed at the first opportunity.

Bummer about the suffering of fatal injuries. Think you'd have suffered a bit less if you'd been wearing more and/or better fatal injury protection equipment?

And what are these assholes so terrified of becoming known in something so fucking obvious, cut and dried, basic, fundamental, total solo pilot error as this one? And if we can't get any straight information outta these lying motherfuckers on one like this...
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27217
Bad Launch!
NMERider - 2012/09/25 14:21:38 UTC

But what we have in excess here on the Org is generally referred to as a mutual masturbation society. That's where pilots get together and sit around and just jack each other off. That's what I see here in spades.
The whole fuckin' sport's a mutual masturbation society. Community is valued over aeronautical competence, everybody's gotta make sure that the lowest common denominators are welcome and getting jerked off at frequent intervals to maximize their own reciprocation margins, anybody who thinks that hang gliding SHOULD be an exercise in aeronautical competence and isn't all that keen about the jerking off the lowest common denominators gets lotsa thumbs down, ignore listings, votes to bury and is voted off the island.

Hang gliding got started on the train wreck rail decades ago and the implosion we're seeing now was always totally inevitable.
Zack C - 2012/06/02 02:20:45 UTC

I just cannot fathom how our sport can be so screwed up.
This is very obvious trend that all of us who've been in this sport for any significant length of time have all been watching and quite aware of.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Zack C - 2013/02/17 13:33:05 UTC

I'm here to promote reform.
Nope. This is incurable cancer.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=12403
weak link table
Tad Eareckson - 2009/06/09 17:30:31 UTC

On the off chance that hang gliding will EVER figure out what a weak link is...
Still after:
- over a half dozen years since that post
- three and a half decades since Donnell Hewett's Infallible Weak Link pure insanity
- two years, ten months, sixteen and two thirds hours since Zack Marzec's fatal whip inconvenience
hang gliding still hasn't figured out:
Tost Flugzeuggerätebau

Weak links protect your aircraft against overloading.
---
http://www.kitestrings.org/post8488.html#p8488
Welcome / About This Forum
<BS> - 2015/10/03 00:16:54 UTC

I didn't recognize the activity in this thread, sorry to hear this.
Yeah, doesn't trigger anything on the Board Index page or move up on a list with a new post. I myself have missed new posts for a bit. And no little orange flag for new posts unless one is registered and logged in. Also not the sorta topic that draws lotsa attention. Hit counter tends not to rocket up very quickly.

For anyone interested...

http://www.kitestrings.org/post8733.html#p8733

Major bad stuff going on with the guy who's got 76.8 percent of the posts here.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=32899
Man, not again...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvaAoxm2lXE
Dave Pendzick - 2015/05/18 21:25:18 UTC

OK, looking at the video of him flying, does his positioning look off??? His hang height seems really really high as he is flying at trim with fully outstretched arms. Does anyone else see this?
Comet - 2015/05/19 07:22:00 UTC

Flying straight-arm like that could certainly diminish control authority.
How 'bout THIS:

06-03114
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3728/9655895292_f4f808fb0e_o.png
Image

Arms almost fully extended, bar almost fully stuffed just to hold the glider down level with the tug at normal tow speed. Does that look safe to you assholes? Does that look like a control compromise for which a pilot can be trained to compensate in a short clinic with Steve Exceptionally-Knowledgeable Wendt?

And does Scott's height over the basetube look like a big enough fuckin' deal to have been a factor in him slamming back into a mountain?

How 'bout Brad here?

39-12010
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5704/22526749865_bdcaf07047_o.png
Image
55-12709
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5715/22526738155_5abcc25c63_o.png
Image
61-12827
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5817/21905536183_874c0d808b_o.png
Image

Has he got the speed range and control authority he would...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27086
Steve Pearson on landings
Steve Pearson - 2012/03/28 23:26:05 UTC

I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.
...flying prone with his hands on the control tubes connector bar?

What a bunch of useless twats...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=33501
How we judge our flying risk
Dave Hopkins - 2015/10/15 14:25:26 UTC

I agree with going upright at a decent alti. Head down with hands on the base tube has killed several pilots. Eliminate that from your flying and fight Accelerated risk factor. Image
Bend over backwards to make control compromise a major issue when it's a total nonissue and bend over backwards totally ignoring it whenever it's totally fucking obvious that it's THE issue that's mangled or killed someone.

You'll notice that none of the twats in that thread are saying that he probably neglected to go upright and to the control tubes for better roll authority when he was heading back downwind towards the mountain.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=33738
Just because.
Dave Pendzick - 2015/12/02 19:12:24 UTC

Steve, I think you are confused about where I stand on these issues. We are free to choose whether or not to jeopardize our personal safety with little oversight or control. I like having the freedom to make my own decisions when it comes to my own safety.
You no longer have the freedom to be clipped into your glider in a setup area are launch line without having a helmet buckled on. And I didn't hear a single whisper of protest from any of you freedom junkies when Bob and u$hPa foisted that atrocity upon everyone with zero discussion and data for justification.
That being said, there are things that I choose not to do simply because it COULD result in me being seriously injured.
Fly with something heavier than a Rooney Link or a Dragonfly tow mast breakaway protector? Good freakin' luck.
This is part of managing risk. These things vary from XC flying to aerobatics and even which Wing I chose to fly. I make these decisions and it should not be anyone but me to decide how and when I choose to go about doing things.
Or the cheap bent pin pro toad crap that Davis sells and forces everyone to use at u$hPa Nationals comps?
I have a problem when the USHPA Gods or other pilots want to try to make decisions for me or control how where or when I can fly.
Just not enough of a problem to ever say or do anything about. Or maybe you just fly at your little local foot launch sites where you can do whatever the fuck you feel like and don't really give a rat's ass about the atrocities to which thousands of other flyers are subjected.
The choice is not theirs to make.
And yet...
Therefore it is nobody's business what kind of wing I fly or who I choose to sell it to, or even the type of flying I choose to engage in.
So you've never heard of FAR 103?
The choices and decisions are mine to make because I am the one who suffers the consequences of my actions.
Certainly none of the first responders or the health care system that maintains whatever's left of you for gawd knows how many years.
The one caviate...
What's that? Couldn't find it in my dictionary.
...to that is if the decisions I make directly impacts the safety of pilots or spectators.
And fuck the issues I just mentioned.
What I am meaning by "directly impact" I mean a physical collision.
NMERider - 2015/12/02 19:53:39 UTC

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news Dave, but USHPA SOP 03-19 provides for a Member Feedback Reporting System that ties into SOP 12-07 Policy on Revocation and Reinstatement of Ratings, Certifications, and Appointments. In other words, as long as you or anyone else chooses to be a USHPA member then that pilot is subject to the rules of SOP 12-07.03 Causes for Revocation.
Which include, but are not limited to, acting in a manner contrary to the interests of the Corporation - which means whatever the fuck the Corporation wants it to. Which means that any member at any time can have his ticket permanently shredded with no means for recourse for wearing the wrong color T-shirt.
It is 1-1/2 pages long so I won't quote the whole thing here.
That's OK, I'll summarize. u$hPa can do to you whatever the fuck pretense it feels like.
Feel free to look it up along with FAR 103.
Yeah, that's one freedom u$hPa permits you.
Pilots do turn each other in.
So do non pilots - like the douchebags running commercial tandem thrill ride businesses.
As a USHPA member you are free to do as you please within the guidelines of the SOPs and FARs.
Bull fucking shit.
Obviously there is plenty of flexibility.
Yeah. Like if you wanna aerotow in compliance with the guidelines, requirements, regulations of the SOPs and FARs you can - and will - suddenly find your career ended.
Only 85 more posts until the 10,000 mark. Image Image
Dave Pendzick - 2015/12/03 18:40:26 UTC

There has to be corroborated witnessed accounts or evidence to prove that the actions in question violated laws or endangered the safety of other pilots or spectators.
What cave have you been living in and how deep is it?
You could not, for example say that someone is unsafe because of a personal grievance of some kind.
Like wanting to fly with a weak link dead center in the middle of the legal range and at the value recommended in the u$hPa SOPs and having something a bit heavier on the front end - and not being allowed to?
What would stop someone from making mountains out of mole hills so to speak and turning someone in for an unjust reason?
Why bother turning someone in for some valid reason when you can just:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 04:55:25 UTC

Ditto dude.

It always amazes to hear know it all pilots arguing with the professional pilots.
I mean seriously, this is our job.
We do more tows in a day than they do in a month (year for most).

We *might* have an idea of how this stuff works.
They *might* do well to listen.
Not that they will, mind you... cuz they *know*.

I mean seriously... ridgerodent's going to inform me as to what Kroop has to say on this? Seriously? Steve's a good friend of mine. I've worked at Quest with him. We've had this discussion ... IN PERSON. And many other ones that get misunderstood by the general public. It's laughable.

Don't even get me started on Tad. That obnoxious blow hard has gotten himself banned from every flying site that he used to visit... he doesn't fly anymore... because he has no where to fly. His theories were annoying at best and downright dangerous most of the time. Good riddance.

So, argue all you like.
I don't care.
I've been through all these arguments a million times... this is my job.
I could be more political about it, but screw it... I'm not in the mood to put up with tender sensibilities... Some weekend warrior isn't about to inform me about jack sh*t when it comes to towing. I've got thousands upon thousands of tows under my belt. I don't know everything, but I'll wager the house that I've got it sussed a bit better than an armchair warrior.
The video of your Long Low Glide Out, lets say for the sake of argument that if you pissed off the wrong person could they in theory turn you in for making poor decisions & being too risky? Is this enough to get your rating removed?
See above. NOBODY is safe from u$hPa. First they came for the unrepentant child molesters and I said nothing because I was a repentant child molester. Then they came for Bob and I said nothing because I wasn't Bob. And besides, he's an asshole who doesn't get along with the people running these shows.

By the way Dave... Your writing totally sucks. I cleaned up most of it to make it more tolerable for our readers.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=33738
Just because.
Comet - 2015/12/03 19:23:54 UTC

Forums are ruining hang gliding.
Which is another way of saying that the people who fly hang gliders discussing hang gliding in the medium of our time in history are ruining hang gliding.
There are invariably a small percentage of members for whom opinion substitutes for actual ability and knowledge.
Who are all tolerated, enabled, left unchecked by the powers which control the forums - virtually always establishment entities and/or tools thereof.
They, through sheer volume of posts...
This will be 6685 for me - just here.
...essentially shout down those who are actually accomplished at their craft.
- Again... With the blessings of the moderators - primarily Jack and Davis, both u$hPa/Industry tools.
- NOBODY can make an honest claim that...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=12403
weak link table
ian9toes - 2009/06/14 15:18:37 UTC
Gold Coast, Queensland

I strongly disagree with banning the one guy who has the most knowledge about safety issues involving what I believe is the most dangerous part of our sport. I hear someone dies every year from towing. I hope SG bites his tongue in the interest of public safety.
...I'm not at the top of this game. And look what Jack, Davis, Peter, Bob, everyone else and his fuckin' dog did to me for that very reason.

- Yeah, the First Amendment is a real bitch. Assholes say shit that's total crap and competent people hafta call them on it and discredit them. And the people flying these things need be smart and responsible enough to do the fuckin' math to the point that they're able to correctly discriminate. What's this world coming to?
As someone once wisely commented: "No wonder the really good pilots stay far away from forums."
- As "SOMEONE" once "WISELY" commented. Funny, when I do a Google search for that sentence your post is the only thing that shows up.

- Yeah, the REALLY GOOD PILOTS are the ones without the integrity to do shit when people's lives are at stake are actually being lost. Gotta love those really good pilots. Bobby Fucking-Genius Bailey, Steve Exceptionally-Knowledgeable Wendt, Lauren Eminently-Qualified-Tandem-Pilot Tjaden, Ryan Instant-Hands-Free-Release Voight, even Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney most of the past three seasons. Haven't heard much from Jack for a good many years either - have we?
Dave Pendzick - 2015/12/03 19:26:45 UTC

How?
I dunno, Dave. Maybe you should pull your head outta your ass a bit and take a look around. Even you might be able to find an example or two.
Comet - 2015/12/03 19:29:01 UTC

Forums are ruining hang gliding.
Yeah, you said that already.
There are invariably a small percentage of members for whom opinion substitutes for actual ability and knowledge.
You mean like THIS:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/31 09:25:57 UTC

Oh how many times I have to hear this stuff.
I've had these exact same arguments for years and years and years.
Nothing about them changes except the new faces spouting them.

It's the same as arguing with the rookie suffering from intermediate syndrome.
They've already made up their mind and only hear that which supports their opinion.

Only later, when we're visiting them in the hospital can they begin to hear what we've told them all along.

Nobody's talking about 130lb weaklinks? (oh please)
Many reasons.
Couple of 'em for ya... they're manufactured, cheap and identifiable.

See, you don't get to hook up to my plane with whatever you please. Not only am I on the other end of that rope... and you have zero say in my safety margins... I have no desire what so ever to have a pilot smashing himself into the earth on my watch. So yeah, if you show up with some non-standard gear, I won't be towing you. Love it or leave it. I don't care.

So please, find me something... that you didn't make... that I can go out and buy from a store... that's rated and quality controlled... that fits your desire for a "non one size fits all" model, and *maybe* we can talk.
But you see... I'm the guy you've got to convince.
(or whoever your tug pilot may be... but we all tend to have a similar opinion about this)

You've not heard about strong-link incidents.
Uh, yeah... cuz we don't let you use them.

"light" weaklink issues?
"I had to land"... boo hoo.
Oh, I thought of an other one... I smashed into the earth after my weaklink let go cuz I fly as badly as I tow, and I'm only still here cuz my weaklink didn't let me pile in harder.

Your anecdotal opinion is supposed to sway me?
You forget, every tow flight you take requires a tug pilot... we see EVERY tow.
We know who the rockstars are and who the muppets are.
Do you have any idea how few of us there are?
You think we don't talk?
I'll take our opinion over yours any day of the week.

Ok, I'm tired of this.
I'm not really sure who you're trying to convince.
Again, I don't care to argue this stuff.
I'll answer actual questions if you're keen to actually hear the answers, but arguing with me? Really? Have fun with that.

Gimme a call when you think of something that we haven't already been through years ago... cuz to date, you have yet to come up with anything new. Well, maybe it's new to you I guess. It's old as dirt to me though.
You stupid gutless pieces o' shit tolerated that little motherfucker and his buddies for years and got EXACTLY the death and destruction you deserved.
They, through sheer volume of posts, essentially shout down those who are actually accomplished at their craft.
Kite Strings people and a couple of allies were the ones who shut that vile little bastard up permanently.
As someone once wisely commented: "No wonder the really good pilots stay far away from forums."
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

"It is infinitely better to have a weak link break too soon rather than too late."
-- Towing Proverb
Dave Pendzick - 2015/12/03 19:41:41 UTC

Your statement does not back up your claim that somehow forums are "Ruinning the Sport" Some poeple are very vocal & opinionated, some poeple choose to stay away from forums because of drama stress etc... That does not constrew evidence proving that the sport is somehow doomed because boisterous assholes like myself, post too much on here.
That's what his writing looks like when I DON'T clean it up, people of varying ages.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=33738
Just because.
Bill Jennings - 2015/12/03 19:50:10 UTC

I've been on forums for various hobbies forever, and before that mailing lists and USENET. It doesn't take much to figure out who knows and who blows.
Then what the fuck are you still doing over there in Jack's Mutual Masturbation Society living room?
As for my hang gliding skills, my .sig tells you all you need to know.
---
But what the hell do I know, I'm just another H2 talking out of his arsehole
Fuck your skills. They're not that important. 'Specially the ones you need for landing safely in narrow dry riverbeds with large rocks strewn all over the place - which is pretty much all Lockout gears you for. It's BASICS and THEORY that are gonna keep you alive and healthy.
NMERider - 2015/12/03 19:58:24 UTC

I would hope and expect that USHPA will do an adequate investigation and gather verifiable or corroborated evidence and also give the pilot in question and opportunity to speak on their own behalf and a chance to first demonstrate better conduct before and adverse action is taken.
Sure Jonathan. Did you watch that travesty they pulled on Bob?
I do know about a few different downgrades and expulsions and have looked at the available evidence and it was pretty damning material.
What? Other people also acted in unspecified manners contrary to the interests of the Corporation?
I have had pilots publicly threaten or accuse me yet when I asked all the RDs whether anyone had turned me in the answer was, no. Some of the dangerous things that pilots get away with and that USHPA is aware of makes my skin crawl.
Like skipping hook-in checks? That's the one that scares me shitless every time I see it at a serious ramp. And I almost never see it at a serious ramp - or anywhere else.
The things I've done and the videos I've posted pale in comparison.
I've never seen you do much - other than fly it into the ground at AJX.
I'm a veritable pussy compare to a lot of pilots.
I'm a pussy compared to ALL...

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3746/13864051003_a820bcf2b8_o.png
Image

..."pilots" - 'specially the really cool dudes who fly pro toad bridles and have been trained properly to handle. standard aerotow weak link inconveniences.
As far as Comet's comments go about fums ruining hang gliding that's pretty ironic coming from an anonymous forum troll who contributes less than zero to the overall community.
Yeah, but that overall community's getting EXACTLY what it deserves.
Forum activity seems to be at an all-time low...
http://www.hanggliding.org/wiki/HG_ORG_Mission_Statement
HangGliding.Org Rules and Policies
No posts or links about Bob K, Scott C Wise, Tad Eareckson and related people, or their material. ALL SUCH POSTS WILL BE IMMEDIATELY DELETED. These people are poison to this sport and are permanently banned from this site in every possible way imaginable.
...and many pilots tell me in person that they enjoy reading the Org but are not inclined to post and get into an argument or flame war.
- Guess ya don't get jerked off when you're just lurking.

- I get a blast outta reading the Org. Ya just can't make up the kinda shit I see there. My life would be so much emptier than it is now (and it's pretty fuckin' empty not) if it weren't for dave hopkins and all his advice to young pilots.

- Fuck anybody who doesn't wanna get into an argument or flame war. If there aren't any flame wars one of two things is happening:
-- everybody's got everything just right
-- the sport's heading towards extinction

Which one of those do you think it is, Jonathan?
Dave Pendzick - 2015/12/03 23:20:08 UTC

You would hope.... This is the problem I have with the whole concept of analyzing someone else's ability to manage risks. Provided there was no adverse event & by that I mean Collision or Crash, how do you determine that the flying someone is engaged in is too much risk for their skillset?
You don't. You just wait until they slam themselves and their eleven year old tandem students into dry lakebeds and the problem corrects itself.
From reading the USHPA SOP it does not sound like they need much to take action against you.
Try reading the documentation we have on Bob Kuczewski's expulsion and figuring out what they think they need to take action against someone.
There does not need to be a sentinal event that causes revokation, only someone's opinion of your so called unsafe action...
Like taking pictures of a paragliding lesson at a public park.
...& THAT has potential to be abused.
The "POTENTIAL"? Ya think?
NMERider - 2015/12/04 00:19:04 UTC

Yeah, the SOPs sound that way and it irritates me but I can't say that I know of any pilots who were downgraded who didn't clearly need their wings clipped at the time.
Sure Jonathan, whatever you say. Bob needed his hang and para wings clipped but all of the nine US PICs who've bought it this year so far were doing just fine.
But the SOPs do resemble a KBG...
KGB
...handbook for snitching on one's neighbor.
No checks and balances or accountability to anyone for anything. Big fuckin' surprise.
I seriously doubt that false reports are fooling anybody and just make the reporter look like Chicken Little or The Boy Who Cried Wolf.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/skysailingtowing/message/7067
AT SOPs - proposed revisions
Tracy S. Tillman - 2009/05/10 02:08:52 UTC

Additionally, if you want to really present a convincing argument, you should also: (a) get other experts to co-sign your letter, such as those who have some or most of the aerotowing-related credentials listed above, who have been doing this for many years with many students, and who support your argument; and (b) present reliable data based on valid research showing that there is a significant difference in safety with the changes that you recommend. Supportive comments from aerotow experts along with convincing data can make a difference. Otherwise, it may seem as if your perception of "the sky is falling" may not be shared by most others who have a wealth of experience and who are deeply involved in aerotowing in the US.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bRrpHNa68iY/UQ6Pv9gRZyI/AAAAAAAAjTg/Hc22bx5122Q/s2048/20943781_BG1.jpg
Image
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9Ek9_lFeSII/UZ4KuB0MUSI/AAAAAAAAGyU/eWfhGo4QeqY/s1024/GOPR5278.JPG
Image
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Xh_NfnOcUns/UZ4Lm0HvXnI/AAAAAAAAGyk/0PlgrHfc__M/s1024/GOPR5279.JPG
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5788/23461251751_e98b9c7500_o.png
Image
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=33738
Just because.
Mark Webber - 2015/12/01 20:34:21 UTC

We learn from other's mistakes.
Do we? Look at this year's fatality list. Tell me what we learned and what there was to learn. Tell me about the stuff we're doing better to get better results.

These US guys:

2015/06/20 - Bertrand Delacroix
2015/10/11 - Jesse Fulkersin
2015/11/08 - Karen Carra

did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG.
Dave Pendzick - 2015/12/01 23:23:27 UTC

The question I am getting at is WHO'S FAULT IS IT if the pilot makes a mistake & fails. Is it the pilots fault or do you blame his mentor???
It's the pilot's fault. The mentor or instructor is totally off the hook. It's not like he could get hurt or killed 'cause a u$hPa certified and appointed rating or instructional official taught him some total crap or failed to teach him something critical before throwing him off a mountain or tying him to a rope.
YOU & YOU ALONE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR OWN ACTIONS.
Fuck YEAH! When was the last time we heard about anyone else being regarded as culpable when some new Two stalled back into the mountain?
I could tell an H2 how to do a loop, but it is his decision as to whether or not he chooses to do so.
Or you could tell him:

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=33501
How we judge our flying risk
Dave Hopkins - 2015/10/15 14:25:26 UTC

I agree with going upright at a decent alti. Head down with hands on the base tube has killed several pilots. Eliminate that from your flying and fight Accelerated risk factor. Image
And it would be his decision to do something that dangerous and stupid after being made fully aware of the circumstances in the deaths of Joe Julik and Jesse Fulkersin.
Is that poor judgement on my part? Yes, but is it even poorer judgement on behalf of the student? YES EVEN MORE!!!
So who's doing this? Who are the instructors and mentors telling Twos how to do loops with the expectations that they will and who are the Two's stalling their attempts, breaking their gliders, wrapping their chutes, and slamming in?
P.S. - Let the record show that I have never attempted or even know how to do a loop. But I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express once.
Then why bring up a stupid example like this which has never existed in the real world when we have TONS of examples of negligent homicide in actual training programs?
Dave Pendzick - 2015/12/01 23:52:38 UTC

This game takes a bit of intuition & common sense & it is not for everyone.
Particularly about 99 percent of the motherfuckers it has in it now.
The point I am trying to make here is one that all of our mother's tried to make when we made a mistake & our justification in doing so was that someone told us to do it...
Bullshit.
If I told you to fly toward that thunderstorm because thats where the epic lift was, who's fault is it when you find yourself dead at the end of the day??? IT AINT ME!
How 'bout if, as a u$hPa Observer, you tell someone:

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1152
Bill Priday's death
Cragin Shelton - 2005/10/03 15:13:27 UTC

You are not hooked in until after the hang check.
which translates as totally ignore u$hPa's quarter decade old hook-in check regulation...
With each flight, demonstrates a method of establishing that the pilot is hooked in just prior to launch.
...just as you were taught to by your total douchebag u$hPa Advanced Instructor and you are good to go - and you wind up dead on the rocks four hundred feet below the ramp exactly two weeks later? Fuck him. Should've known better.

What's the point in having a rating system and instructor certification? To whom do we give Instructor of the Year Awards? The really cool dudes with great personalities? The ones everybody likes and who warn about the false sense of security given by hook-in checks?

Keep on doing and saying the same things over and over guys. And look up once a month or so to see where your precious sport is going.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=45440
The Future of Free Flight in the U.S. is at Risk!
Davis Straub - 2015/12/03 14:42:14 UTC

The Future of Free Flight in the U.S. is at Risk!
So hang gliding in the US is free flight, huh?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 04:55:25 UTC

Don't even get me started on Tad. That obnoxious blow hard has gotten himself banned from every flying site that he used to visit... he doesn't fly anymore... because he has no where to fly. His theories were annoying at best and downright dangerous most of the time. Good riddance.
Thanks for letting me know.
Donations to the self insurance fund needed
A lot more than you think - if I get to do anything about it.
http://ushpa.aero/freeflightforever.asp
USHPA - Free Flight Forever
The insurance landscape has changed rapidly...
You mean like the way a Ponzi scheme collapses?
...forcing USHPA to pursue self-insurance.
Oh. So u$hPa's being forced to do something. Big surprise. u$hPa's never done shit to do anything other than by force.
At the beginning this requires capital to set up:
Yeah?

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=463
Davis Straub's "Oz Report" Conflict of Interest
Bob Kuczewski - 2011/02/12 06:56:36 UTC

A third Director (who I'll call "Mr. X") chimed in that same day with this:
Perhaps a strongly worded letter from Tim will do the trick. We can't force Tad to work within the USHPA framework but we can make it unpleasant and expensive for him if he chooses to makes derogatory and false statements about USHPA to the FAA he can't back up.
How much do you need?
We have raised $1,070,000 to date, and must raise an additional $930,000 by March 1st, 2016 to continue protecting our sites, schools, and members.
To CONTINUE protecting our sites, schools, and members? That's what you've been doing all this time? Schools maybe - from the consequences of their incompetence, negligence, criminal conduct.
We have received a $100,000 challenge grant from a member...
Don't bother thanking me. It was nothing.
...meaning that once our membership raises $830,000, this donor will provide the $100,000 needed to complete the capitalization.

We still need to raise $827,000.
"We?" Who's that?
Make your contribution today!
You needn't worry about that.
I've flown a dozen of those - High Rock, the Pulpit (it's not the "Pulpit Rock" and it's in Pennsylvania - not Maryland, where those assholes have it), Draht Hill, Ellenville, Currituck, Richmondale, Sideling (Bill's) Hill, Fisher Road, Hyner, Kennedy, Henson, Whitwell.

Unhooked launches that I know about. Consequenes:
- minorish: Mingus, Crestline, Kagel, Lookout - Colorado, Heavener, High Point - West Virginia
- serious: Pulpit
- fatal: Mingus, Talcott, Whitwell
Post Reply