Weak links

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/docs/Launchdolly.pdf
Richard Thorp
Launch Dolly Caught on Harness Zipper Line and Taken Aloft
Wharton, Texas Sunday 30 October 2016

First:
Get a hook knife if you do not have one!
Check for loose lines before launch
Oh. So getting a hook knife takes precedent over checking for loose lines before launch. I guess that makes sense - given how quickly after launch one finds out whether or not loose lines are an issue.
if you are flying and climbing, continue - it gives thinking time and if needed, parachute opening time.
Boy we're seeing this crappy argument that being on tow is somehow safer than being off tow a lot now that Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney has tired of trying to educate all us muppets and protect us from ourselves and our decisions as pilots. And strangely we don't seem to be seeing the surge in relevant carnage one would have predicted.
Following is a summary of the incident last Sunday where a launch dolly caught my Wills Wing Z5 harness and was taken aloft.
Stupid launch dolly.
No injuries...
Unless you consider the stupid launch dolly.
...in no small part to the fantastic flying of Tiki who saw the situation and carefully pulled me to a safe height where I could deal with it.
GAWD you're lucky to have had a tug driver who could fly so FANTASTICALLY. Just look at that flying:
Image
Has any of us ever seen flying that FANTASTIC before! I shudder to think what might have happened if you'd had some stupid hack like Keavy Nenninger in front of you.
Pilot Narrative:

After a normal ground run, into a slightly crossing wind, I felt some significant bumps on the boot of the harness as the glider left the dolly - and something significant tugging at me.
SIGNIFICANT?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9230
Departing the launch cart
Jim Rooney - 2008/05/04 10:50:46 UTC

That "pop" out of the cart is cuz one of two things.
A) you're lifting the cart into the air and dropping a couple hundred pounds when you let go... might have a bit of an effect eh?
Couple hundred pounds. Goddam right it's SIGNIFICANT. I'm surprised your leading edges didn't buckle.
The glider remained under control, although at this stage there was clearly something strange - it felt exactly as it was, a weight that would swing like a pendulum a few seconds after a weight shift was applied. At 50 - 100ft I looked down and saw the dolly hanging below me from the boot of the harness, hanging from the zipper line. Given that the glider was flying, I had reasonable control over it, and we were climbing I simply focused on following the tug.
Must've been a bit rough - given all that fantastic flying Tiki was doing.
Luckily the air was fairly smooth - and provided I was not too aggressive with the weight shift the main effect of the dangling dolly was to apply a delayed yaw to my harness - the process was: weight shift - glider responds, relax to stop the delayed swing of the dolly shifting my CG and just let it rotate my body about the hang strap.
Plus smooth air is consistent with all the towing theory, instruction, training, equipment you use.
It got a little more complicated if I needed multiple inputs and rough air would have been a big problem.
So many tombstones on which we could engrave that.
I was also concerned not to break the weak link...
Yeah, an increase in the safety of the towing operation would've been about the LAST thing you'd have wanted to deal with in that situation.
I really wanted some height, so the focus was to just climb with the tug with as little drama as possible.
How is it possible to just climb with a tug that's flying FANTASTICALLY with minimal drama?
I could see the dolly was hanging by the zipper cord just caught round one of the small bolts that protrude from the bottom of the side rail - and a little concerned that it would fall on something / someone - as well as hoping that it would just fall ...

Once above 2000ft-
I wonder what altitude you need for a couple hundred pound dolly to hit terminal velocity.
...I started to gently experiment with possible solutions - the climb gave me time to think it through - and generate a bit of a plan.
Gawd I'm getting sick and tired of hearing this crappy argument.
There were 3 options. I had a hook knife and provided I could reach to the boot of my harness I could cut the line. I could also pull the zipper tab - with great effort as I had to lift the dolly and get to the line or knot - that would take 2 hands but at least was theoretically possible.
And taking hands off the control bar is never a problem under hang gliding aeronautical theory - 'specially the towing flavor.
I could also use my chute. Since we were still climbing, and I was in control I tried to think through the consequences - if I cut the line in the wrong place and it hung up again and jerked the glider what would happen?
Couple hundred pound launch dolly? I hate to think.
- could I reach the boot? What would happen when you unload the glider by 100lb suddenly?
You suddenly have a hundred pounds less wingloading? (Somebody put one of these things on a scale so's we can get a reasonable number. I'm guestimating under half that.)
Should I release then try or stay on tow and try?
Once you release you no longer have the other option. And your flight time WILL become very distinctly limited.
I also was trying to see what I could reach...
If you can reach your easily reachable release you can reach anything.
- which tended to put me out of position but gave me a good idea what was possible, and after some rehearsals I was feeling fairly confident I could shed the dolly - we were at around 5000ft by then.
Must've taken an unimaginable amount of fantastic flying on Tiki's part.
My plan was - try to hook knife the cord at the boot - if not then release and use 2 hands to cut the knot at the draw tab and if I ended up below 2000ft, pull the chute.
The chute which Kelly Harrison never considered as an option.
The first option went without a hitch.
Interesting choice of words - given the situation.
Analysis - Pilots action
Well, we know that ONE of the pilots was flying fantastically.
1. The discussions / chit chat I had had with many people had included the actions to take if you end up taking a cart aloft.
Maybe you should've had more discussions / chit chat with many people about the actions to take in order to NOT end up taking a cart aloft.
Therefore the thought of releasing or anything else except carry on climbing with the tow did not occur.

2. The time spent climbing was massively valuable - it took a while to build a plan and rehearse it.
Fuck that crappy argument.
3. I missed an easier option - the line is exposed all the way down the harness on the left side, from toggle to boot - see pic below of Alex's Z5. I could have cut it at my waist much more easily. This was out of sight... but would have been easier.

http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5825/22761928668_57e03df835_o.png
Image

4. Low down, early in the tow the only option would have been the chute. Betty' class told me that. It was clear that to land with the cart dangling and attached to the harness would have pitched me face down.
Yeah, that would've been fuckin' IN EVITABLE. No way you'd have been able to survive landing with the cart dangling, rolling, dragging behind you.
Analysis - What more could have gone wrong?

1. There were 3 significant factors that enable a good outcome:

-a. I had an accessible hook knife (if you have not got one - or it's tether is not long enough to reach everywhere you can reach (I use 1/8" bungee for the tether) please get one!
Razor-sharp cutting tool you can use to slash through lines in an instant.
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5544/30851998081_5e97343263_o.png
Image

-b. The air was smooth. Rough air would make control more marginal and more importantly with the extra weight of the dolly and compromised control may cause a rapid low height weak link failure.
Which would be a BAD thing?
I use the light greenspot weak link and protow.
Zack Marzec configuration! Brilliant choice!
I do not get breaks but I will change to the heavier green line like many others.
Why? If something ain't broke then why fix it? (We need to ID and test this line. Fuckin' amazing how well these u$hPa/Industry scumbags have been able to keep the focal point of their safe towing system an insider secret.)
-c. I was over terrain that could safely accept a dolly.
I'm glad your terrain found your dolly acceptable.
Analysis - Immediate Cause

The immediate cause was the loop of zipper line that is at the boot of the harness. It is just visible in the pic below. Most times I will pull this up to the waist. I failed to do so this time. It caught on the bolt that protruded below the upright, where the threads were approx 1/8in exposed above the nut (circled)

http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5448/22761928428_e190f4f0da_o.png
Image
So what DID you preflight? List the stuff you found more important.
Here you see the loop at the boot of the harness. The white line is my cut line, the black one is another Z5 harness.

http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5780/22761927938_069f11c712_o.png
Image

My hypothesis is that the combination of the wind blowing it back and the harness boot swinging close to the dolly caused it to hook onto a small bolt underneath the V cradle upright.
It was an unsecured line. Who gives a flying fuck HOW it caught?
As the rear of the dolly was slightly lifted by this it rotated tail over nose, thereby wrapping the loop a half turn around the tube, making it very unlikely to fall off.

Analysis - Prevention:

1. By checks

-a. Sloppy preflight checks by me - I often pull the zipper line up - but it is not really in the preflight check - it is more of a "let's get tidy before launch" action. Easily forgotten
Not for me. Never even close over a span of decades.
-b. Organise the zipper line inside the harness boot before laying down in the harness
Why not just zip up the harness?
-c. Ground crew: It is practically hidden from the front - so it is unreasonable for the GC to see it unless it is built into the hang check as part of 'lines'.
The fuckin' ground crew should be LOOKING for the stuff that's hard to see. They don't give flying fucks about pro toad bridles, easily reachable bent pin releases, velcroed on bicycle brake levers, lethally and illegally understrength weak links, weak links that offer ZERO protection after bridle wraps, wheel-less basetubes... And they can't be bothered to check for snag threats which are likely to demolish launch carts at a minimum in an environment which not all that infrequently kills gliders due to normal total shit safety margins?
We could do this, along with the release check
Oh. They check THIS:

http://ozreport.com/20.183
Barrel release forces
Richard Thorp
Texas

I have been laid low with sinusitis for the past week - so thought I would do a release force test on my barrel release - something that I have been wanting to do for a while:

Image

I use the top black one in the picture - I forget the source of it but it is a thin wall aluminum barrel 3/4in inside diameter with a stainless steel curved pin. The tension is limited by a single loop of the fishing line I have used as a weaklink since Hempstead. I do not have a good way of measuring forces - I used a lever and baggage scale. To the best I can determine the weaklink was failing around the 200lbf mark, so all the tests done were probably between 150lbf and 200lbf

Anyway. At this "high" load of 150 - 200lbf, the top black release takes a VERY VERY strong pull to open it. It always opened, but the release force is MUCH higher than I am comfortable with. You have to be sure to grip it properly when releasing. I can really see how a first attempt could potentially fail. It could be helped with a larger diameter ring around it so that if you slide your hand down the line there is a better shoulder to pull against.

I have another barrel release - the lower one with the red line. This I made myself with thick wall Al tube 3/8in inside diameter and a straight parachute pin. This is very similar in geometry to the 'Getof' release I have seen around - and is a design I like. The combination of the straight pin that has a better mechanical advantage and the smaller tube means the release force is much smoother and very easy - 2 fingers can easily operate it.

So - what is the conclusion?. Well this is a personal question of risk tolerance, but for me I feel the 3/4in design is very marginal. I am now not wanting to use it as my primary and have to fight with one hand off the bar to effect a release. I also can see very little sense in using it as a secondary release - secondary releases will be used under high stress situations and often with an unpracticed hand with the release in an awkward position. For approx $10 and 10 minutes work I can make up a much better alternative.

Just food for thought.
bent pin piece o' shit excuse for an aerotow release and if you've got one then it's OK.
2. By design

-a. Remove or tape over or otherwise minimise all sticking out catch points (I will do this at the earliest opportunity!)
So that stupid people will have less reason to check critical preflight items.

Lookout has a net off the lip of the ramp...

8-2401
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2926/14074537022_03a98e4a57_o.png
Image

...so why bother doing hook-in checks?
-b. Fit a smooth cup in the vee of the rear of the dolly (imagine a bucket cut to cradle the harness boot and keep it clear of all metalwork and rotating wheels
See above.
-c. Fit a weak link to the zipper line
And a single loop of 130 pound Greenspot should be just about right for the job. Hard to go wrong with a proven system that works.
-d. Extend the dolly wheelbase to give greater clearance between boot and frame
Install a parachute which blows when a sensor detects a rapid increase in barometric pressure.
-e. Design the harness with no loose lines at the boot
Zip the fucking harness up when you get on the cart.
Safe flying
Richard
Thanks, Richard. And thanks for all the participation and support you've given Kite Strings.
Dave Gills
Posts: 45
Joined: 2014/12/15 17:54:14 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Dave Gills »

Tad Eareckson wrote:So what DID you preflight? List the stuff you found more important.
Tad Eareckson wrote:It was an unsecured line. Who gives a flying fuck HOW it caught?
I see a slack "down" line so often it makes me seriously wonder.

The up line, retracting bungee is an often overlooked component that requires periodic replacement in order to work properly.
If it loses its elasticity, it will fail to hold the zip up line clear of the pod opening. (it will hang down).
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

I see a slack "down" line so often it makes me seriously wonder.
Well, I guess as long as you use a standard aerotow weak link to increase the safety of the towing operation nothing else much matters.
The up line...
I installed a roughly half length closing lanyard, ran it through a ring I installed as far back as I could reach, and terminated it with a halyard ball. Pull the lanyard forward as far as the ring will allow, let go, grab the zipper pull it up the rest of the way.

Totally eliminated the opening crap. Unzip the boot directly by hand as far as you can comfortably go, push open the rest of the way with your knees.

If I had it to do over again I'd install skid plates on the harness and belly in zipped up - minus an easy headwind anyway.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=34876
Jeff Glidewell - R.I.P.
NMERider - 2016/11/13 19:50:50 UTC

I have edited the watchable portions of Jay's video of Jeff's vintage Moyes glider...
Not a Pliable Moose.
...and the tow up until release. There is nothing to see after this ends.
And the quality before sucks bigtime. Be thankful you're just seeing the reduced images.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2IkPolwdoQ
Kansas surface tow 2016.11.06
Soar SoCal - 2016/11/13

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2IkPolwdoQ
dead
2016.11.05 actually.

01-00000
- 01 - chronological order
- -0 - minutes
- 00 - seconds
- 00 - frame (30 fps)

01-00000
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5799/30865784212_bacc64825b_o.png
Image
Jay: 'Kay, gettin' the hang glider ready.
02-00128
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5327/30865783792_20995c8e85_o.png
Image
03-00207
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5766/25346455049_e768b6b59f_o.png
Image
Gonna pull it... with the car...
04-00727
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5488/30982212595_911735440b_o.png
Image
It's WAY down there. About... almost a mile - four thousand feet or better.
05-01506
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5348/30982212195_8e8dafaa3f_o.png
Image
06-02222
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5700/30982211765_9d831874fe_o.png
Image
Go now.
07-02402
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5724/30680467170_f1588e4d74_o.png
Image
08-02427
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5653/30982210525_5d1598d937_o.png
Image
09-02512
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5342/30982210105_8edea27f55_o.png
Image
10-02628
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5727/30865781342_7fb47fb39f_o.png
Image
11-02718
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5685/30982207905_b8435ff85c_o.png
Image
12-02807
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5614/30982207245_685cb43625_o.png
Image
13-02818
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5659/25346452009_c2b1c06b1c_o.png
Image
14-02903
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5441/30893898861_8da4aba757_o.png
Image
Uuuoh - Go, go, go, go, go!
15-03007
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5496/30865779882_4a1d30bb5e_o.png
Image
16-03026
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5509/30982205565_e963116e2e_o.png
Image
17-03107
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5498/30865779592_cf8f8ce424_o.png
Image
18-03128
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5612/30982204765_d92d9d26c5_o.png
Image
He's up!
19-03302
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5706/30982204225_ffc19963fd_o.png
Image
He's up about ten feet. Keep goin'.
He probably go a little faster even I'll bet maybe. Don't, don't break your rope I guess.
20-04314
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5498/25346450789_a8b734a51c_o.png
Image
He's up. Can you see him I guess, can't ya?
21-04601
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5750/30865778802_e5b6c7900c_o.png
Image
Radio: Yes, I can see him.
22-04709
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5337/22803754098_02a0b3ab16_o.png
Image
Jay: He's doin' great! Hahahaha, that's pretty good, I might hafta try it.
23-05612
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5454/22803753758_8d7d73c17a_o.png
Image
Jay: Can't even see him in my... camera here.
24-05813
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5543/30680463590_67aef47c37_o.png
Image
Radio: Rope's still on the ground.
Jay: What's that?
25-10309
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5783/30865778132_694a40972d_o.png
Image
Radio: Rope is still on the ground.
Jay: No, kiddin'.
Radio: Down here.
26-10915
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5792/30946742446_41793211b4_o.png
Image
27-11107
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5446/30982201715_10d48a0a55_o.png
Image
Yeah, he's gettin'... There she is.
Jump to top:
http://www.kitestrings.org/post9799.html#p9799
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Pretty sad watching this video, knowing what's gonna happen within seconds of its conclusion and how lives will be affected - probably including the little Sheltie here. Reasonably good innovated tow system with a lot of work in it, zilch conditions, no evidence of extraordinary stupidity.

03-00207
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5766/25346455049_e768b6b59f_o.png
Image

Odd that he's setting up flat in these:

08-02427
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5653/30982210525_5d1598d937_o.png
Image

conditions. (Note we have a parachute - for what that's worth.)

Release system appears to be some Hewett inspired garbage substituting for a Koch two stage...

09-02512
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5342/30982210105_8edea27f55_o.png
Image

Polypro over/under extensions.
Jay: Uuuoh - Go, go, go, go, go!
15-03007
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5496/30865779882_4a1d30bb5e_o.png
Image

Notice we're foot launching and using light tension in light conditions. Anxiety in Jay's voice, glider drops a bit (must be some downhill near the beginning of the runway). Also note the immediate and substantial left roll and yaw - which is gonna be a recurring theme here. Long time before we start climbing.

Shifts to basetube in pretty short order.

18-03128
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5612/30982204765_d92d9d26c5_o.png
Image
He's up!
19-03302
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5706/30982204225_ffc19963fd_o.png
Image

You say that like it's a GOOD thing - making more of this crappy argument that being on tow is somehow safer than being off tow.
Jay: He probably go a little faster even I'll bet maybe. Don't, don't break your rope I guess.
Yes, Jay, Don't break your "ROPE". (And Jay is well aware of what's going to break...
Jay Glidewell - 2016/11/10 18:38:36 UTC

...and the break point strings looked great.
...if anything does.)

20-04314
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5498/25346450789_a8b734a51c_o.png
Image

Nope. A Hewett rating Infallible Weak Link increasing the safety of the towing operation is about the LAST thing we wanna hafta deal with at this point. It's an elective "perfect" release that's gonna leave him in irrevocably fucked status.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9230
Departing the launch cart
Jim Rooney - 2007/09/01 02:39:53 UTC

Which brings us to the reason to have a 914 in the first place... you need one.
Something made you get a 914 instead of a 582. 914s are horribly expensive to own and maintain. If you own one, you need it... it's a safety thing. Short runways, tall trees, whatever. You've got a 914 to increase your safety margin. So when it comes down to my safety or having a conversation, we're going to have a conversation. Wether you chose to adjust is then up to you.
So let's go really easy on the gas.

Hang Four, proned out, centered, looking good...

22-04709
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5337/22803754098_02a0b3ab16_o.png
Image

However, definitely rolled and yawed left here:

25-10309
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5783/30865778132_694a40972d_o.png
Image

pretty significantly AGAIN and that's the direction in which things go abruptly south upon release - which is low and suspiciously...
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson
...early. My last frame here:

27-11107
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5446/30982201715_10d48a0a55_o.png
Image

he's looking better and there's no apparent deterioration in the remaining three plus seconds of crap video. But we've definitely identified a critical issue with the glider itself. The winch is OBVIOUSLY stationed well to the right of all the trees before the ones constituting the horizon.
Jay: It's WAY down there. About... almost a mile - four thousand feet or better.
05-01506
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5348/30982212195_8e8dafaa3f_o.png
Image

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=34876
Jeff Glidewell - R.I.P.
Jay Glidewell - 2016/11/09 19:56:13 UTC

He went out about 1/2 mile and was up about 120' approx. He released from the tow line and it shot out and the parachute came out attached to the tow line, There was no "lockout" the tow was 110% perfect. As soon as he released he went into a left turn steepening up to maybe 45 degrees, He came out of the turn at about 180 degrees and went into a dive into the ground. From release to impact seemed like maybe 2 seconds. The way the cord shot out on release tells me that he drastically slowed, stalled out and started to spin Brought it right out of the spin and got the nose down just like you should but wasn't quite able get the nose up in time to avoid the ground, The wind was fairly light and may have been 5-10mph. If he would have dropped the nose and got enough speed up to take the pressure off the rope before release he would be here now telling everyone all about it. It was much like running with a kite string then suddenly letting go.
In other words, if that had been a more aggressive tow...

10-03323
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2928/14397296584_1d0e5e389b_o.png
Image

...he'd have been OK. But that didn't happen 'cause we were using a really Infallible Weak Link...
Jay Glidewell - 2016/11/09 22:08:52 UTC

...and yes he had a weak link, Three or six strands of string line he said tested out to like 225#.
...the equivalent of a Rooney Link on a two point bridle, and...
Jay: He's up about ten feet. Keep goin'.
He probably go a little faster even I'll bet maybe. Don't, don't break your rope I guess.
24-05813
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5543/30680463590_67aef47c37_o.png
Image
Radio: Rope's still on the ground.
...we had to baby the gas the whole flight in order to keep the focal point of the safe towing system from increasing the safety of the towing operation.

There was some moderate problem with this glider (note that Jay makes no statement on recent or any other flight history of this bird) and they were using a tow system deliberately dangerously compromised in order to make it properly "safe" and compensating for that compromise with dangerously low power. The video and Jay's comments - on camera and forum - tell us virtually everything we need to know about this one.

And note that we haven't heard a peep on this one out of Ryan Instant-Hands-Free-Release Voight - The Jack Show's...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=29984
What happened to the org?
Mike Lake - 2013/09/26 18:59:57 UTC

On the other hand there are plenty of people who fly lots but still manage to spew out the most incredible and dangerous garbage to others.

This includes some of the "professionals" people who work in the industry and are therefore able to regard themselves as such.
They really believe they have a monopoly on knowledge and when finding themselves on the losing side of a debate resort to the old standby "This is what we do so fuck off you weekender".

I say good riddance to those nauseating, know it all, self indulgent "professionals" who have banished themselves from this site.
...remaining self appointed expert on flying in general and towing in particular.

Jonathan posted the video and announced it on the thread near two days ago with absolute zilch response to date. The thread's as dead as Jeff himself. And again, compare/contrast to the five pages of analysis we'd have had in the same timeframe if someone had posted a video of a bonked spot landing attempt.
Jay: He's doin' great! Hahahaha, that's pretty good, I might hafta try it.
Not gonna happen now. Lost a forty year pilot, undoubtedly the tow system he spent a couple years developing, and probably all enthusiasm for the sport in that neck of the woods.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25321
Stop the Stupids at the USHPA BOD meeting
Mark G. Forbes - 2011/09/29 02:26:23 UTC

We can establish rules which we think will improve pilot safety, but our attorney is right. USHPA is not in the business of keeping pilots "safe" and it can't be. Stepping into that morass is a recipe for extinction of our association. I wish it were not so, but it is.
And you motherfuckers NOT stepping into that "morass" and creating the deadly morass in which everybody's now "functioning" is a blindingly obvious recipe for the extinction of the sport.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=50299
Aerotow mishap
Fabiano - 2016/11/14 13:26:53 UTC
Rio de Janeiro

I would like to thank and congratulate the pilot, Richard, for the detailed PDF report of the incident, published in the Oz Report.
And I would like to thank and congratulate all the pilots who prepared and preflighted properly and competently and DIDN'T drag thousand dollar launch carts up thousands of feet into the sky and cut them loose over airports.
When I learned to aerotow I was adverted about the possibility of cart entaglement but then later, other than making sure my lines are as secured as possible, I never gave this much thought.
So you NEEDED to be adverted about the possibility of cart entaglement? It's not a brain dead common sense thing? If there'd been nobody around to advert you then you'd have been fine starting your roll with streaming harness and/or VG lines?
After reading the report it really opened my eyes to the difficulty or impossibility of landing with the cart hanging...
How? He didn't make any effort to land with the cart hanging.
...unless you were lucky enough that it landed in a way that allowed the wheels to roll, it's surely a major whack...
Surely? We see major whacks all the fuckin' time - often arm breaking, sometimes career ending or fatal - just from assholes trying to perfect their flare timing.
...almost to the point of me thinking that it might be better to go to the trees and tree land and hope for the best...
Keep thinking. The more great thinkers like you we have working on these things the better off we'll all be.
The thought of having to use a hook knife to unload the cart never crossed my mind...
Mine either.
...but now I will adopt this resource as the only safe alternative to this situation.
Keep us posted. I never get tired of seeing expensive launch dollies demolished due to glider jockey cluelessness and AT operation fundamental incompetence.
I can only imagine the anxiety of being on tow in this situation, and it´s so great that the tug pilot never gave him the rope.
Any comment on THIS:

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
weak links
Jim Rooney - 2007/08/01 13:47:23 UTC

Whatever's going on back there, I can fix it by giving you the rope.
Davis Show Cocksucker In Good Standing?
It must be very hard to be on tow one handed while trying to cut a cord like that, it's really a nightmare scenario...
How hard would it have been for Jeff Bohl to have been on tow one handed while trying to pry open his easily reachable bent pin pro toad release in a slowly progressing lockout precipitated by a fraction of a second grab for a dangling camera at under treetop level?
...congrats to the pilot and tug pilot.
The glider pilot who flew FANTASTICALLY with a pro toad bridle and dangling launch cart to match the FANTASTIC flying of the tug pilot. And fuck all those other pairs who flew to release altitude WITHOUT incident that weekend.
That being said, this WW Z5 design is not good for towing.
I advise choosing a modern bullet harness that has the cord running cleanly on the inside.
Since we're all too fucking stupid to perform obvious simple setup and preflight procedures properly and consistently.
These have become so functional and comfortable these days that there's just no reason to opt for this old boxy line dangling design!!
Is there any harness that NEEDS all that line?

(Note the conspicuous absence of Wills Wing and Betty from the discussions.)
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=50940
Quadcopters hauling us up?
Gary Solomon - 2016/12/26 14:40:10 UTC
Chicago

I'm all for it, but there are safety procedures that need addressing.

With a normal tow, you are at flying speed under any adverse condition.
What about drone failure when the Glider is at 30 feet with 0 forward velocity?
How 'bout when you're flying pro toad behind a Quest 914 Dragonfly into a monster thermal, you go up like a rocket and your Voight/Rooney Instant Hands Free Release...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=50890
More on the Russian Mouth Release
Davis Straub - 2016/12/22 15:10:02 UTC

Mikha, also we use 140 or 200 pound weaklinks that go on one half of the bridle.
...increases the safety of the towing operation? Did we ever get THOSE safety procedures properly addressed? Or are we OK 'cause we get to go back to the head of the launch line immediately following the inconvenience?
User avatar
<BS>
Posts: 422
Joined: 2014/08/01 22:09:56 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by <BS> »

It's a generous incentive considering normally things that take up too much time aren't allowed in competition because it disadvantages the pilots behind you. Take cutsies all day long for releasing before you have a problem, but don't dare take an extra second to hook up with a release that allows you to maintain control while you're at it.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Yeah...

http://ozreport.com/13.238
Adam Parer on his tuck and tumble
Adam Parer - 2009/11/25

Due to the rough conditions weak links were breaking just about every other tow and the two tugs worked hard to eventually get everyone off the ground successfully.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Davis Straub - 2011/08/28 15:26:28 UTC

Then again, Russell Brown had us double up behind him after six breaks in a row at Zapata. We couldn't figure out why we had so many breaks so quickly. Maybe just coincidence.
I was gonna do that one.
Steve Davy
Posts: 1338
Joined: 2011/07/18 10:37:38 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Steve Davy »

We couldn't figure out why we had so many breaks so quickly...
Increase the time interval between launches, Davis. That should help you in figuring out a way to have breaks less quickly.

PS - I suspect that if you made it a rule that all launches were to be spaced at one hour intervals in order to have breaks less quickly you'd be credited as a "fucking genius".
Post Reply