instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=25435
Raunchy Day At The Ridge + Release Failure
Mike Lake - 2012/03/05 13:24:06 UTC

Actually, I was referring to releasing (or not) as the occupational hazard and not towing as such. Towing is my preferred method of launch and I agree one hundred percent with your statement regarding unfamiliar conditions.
Of course if you just tow in familiar conditions you better not yet have had your fill of sled rides. And if you tow in unfamiliar conditions you should probably use tow equipment - and a glider - built and tested to some kind of standards.
Over here two releases are a foreign concept, a bit like having two steering wheels on a car in case one fails.
So over there the steering wheel comes with the car at the dealership? You don't buy the steering wheel separately from a cabbie with a really impressive driving record?
I prefer to have one that is reliable (never say never acknowledged).
I prefer to - and DO - have one that's bulletproof. But it's not slapped together by some flight park shithead and thus it's not Industry Standard - like the Lockout Release under discussion - so the flight park shitheads are free to tell me to leave it on the ground and buy one of theirs or I can can go fuck myself.
What I was trying to get across is that these things happen, get reported, and then go away until the next time.
Sometimes they get reported...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25321
Stop the Stupids at the USHPA BOD meeting
Mark G. Forbes - 2011/09/30 23:21:56 UTC

Here's how it really works:

- Member submits an accident report. Could be the pilot who had the accident, or some other witness.

- Accident report is sent to Tim to maintain legal privilege. Tim reviews the report and determines whether there's significant legal risk associated with it. He may redact certain parts (personally identifiable information, etc.) if in his opinion exposure of that information poses a risk to us. If the report is very risky, he may decide that it can't be shared further, and will notify the ED about it. He may also notify our insurers if he sees a potential for a claim, as is normal practice for any incident where we are aware of such a potential.

- Redacted report goes to the accident review chairs, for incorporation into periodic articles in the magazine. Articles focus on root causes of accidents, not on personal narratives or details.
But unless Tim Herr thinks the report can be spun to safely lay all of the blame on the dead pilot and none of it on the motherfuckers at the flight park and the USHGA motherfuckers who qualified and appointed them nobody ever hears about it.
Instant global communications doesn't seem to have helped the HG community too much with incident reporting, or more to the point doesn't produce too many conclusions, or maybe I'm looking in the wrong place.
That's 'cause you've got a bunch of corrupt motherfuckers controlling the wires on the big forums and anybody who doesn't toe the party line...
http://www.hanggliding.org/wiki/HG_ORG_Mission_Statement

No posts or links about Bob K, Scott C Wise, Tad Eareckson and related people, or their material. ALL SUCH POSTS WILL BE IMMEDIATELY DELETED. These people are poison to this sport and are permanently banned from this site in every possible way imaginable.
...is declared poison to this sport and permanently banned from the sites in every possible way imaginable and no one is allowed to even whisper anything about him or his material or relatives or people who agree with him that two plus two equals four.
Take for example an incident reported (along with a video) in these pages of a guy hacking at his line with a hook knife a couple of years ago.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=16384
Tow Release Malfunction

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJGUJO5BjnA

067-14615
Image
Image
098-20006

Yeah, but...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=16384
Tow Release Malfunction
Jim Rooney - 2010/03/26 20:54:43 UTC

Bent pin releases are indeed very very reliable. But 100%? Nope. It's exceptionally rare, but they jam. All mechanical things do.
He was using a VERY VERY RELIABLE release. So what are you gonna do? Spring for one of those European Chest Crushers? I don't think so.
Was there ever an incident report made available, has this report done anything to reduce the chance of it happening again?
What? And have a massive recall of all this shitrigged junk all these fine professionals have been unloading on us for decades? Maybe open up some serious liability issues?
Jim Rooney - 2010/03/26 20:54:43 UTC

Dude, quit bogarting that stuff ;)
Dude, quit bogarting that stuff. ;)
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=25435
Raunchy Day At The Ridge + Release Failure
Zack C - 2012/03/05 14:39:24 UTC
Houston
Has anybody else experienced anything like this? Any solutions or comments?
You can find lots of accounts of similar experiences if you look. My search for a better keel-mounted release that could be actuated without taking a hand off the bar led to this one:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26440
"GETOFF" Primary Release

Note what Antoine says regarding high loads. I've been using this release for a few months...no problems so far.

Another thing about bridle wraps...if your primary release fails, you pull the secondary/bottom release, and the bottom end of your bridle wraps, you'll be towing solely from the keel, which is a very bad situation and one reason you need a primary that will always work.
Oh, bullshit!

- Don't you think that if that were an ACTUAL problem that it would've been covered in in the excellent training they got in the process of qualifying for their AT ratings?

- How come it's not even mentioned in the excellent book, Towing Aloft, by Dennis Pagen and Bill Bryden?

- Who the fuck are you anyway?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Steve Davy - 2011/08/31 10:11:32 UTC

Zack figured it out. Well done Zack! Enjoy your vacation.
Kinsley Sykes - 2011/08/31 11:35:36 UTC

Well actually he didn't. But if you don't want to listen to the folks that actually know what they are talking about, go ahead.
Feel free to go the the tow park that Tad runs...
He sounds like Tad.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 05:37:34 UTC

I suspect you ARE Tad.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=25302
Interview with Davis Straub, OzReport founder
Jack Axaopoulos - 2012/02/24 14:38:01 UTC

How interesting....
Newtons IP address and AeroTows IP addresses both come from the Wichita Kansas area.
Better pull his plug, Jack. Just to be on the safe side.
How big do you make your weak link loops, Terry?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TUGS/message/944
weak link material question
Jim Gaar - 2008/04/25 16:42:47 UTC

Try the 130 test "kite" string. It's 8 strand poly weave I think. Worked for 5 years flawlessly on solo AT with a 150+ foot poly towline, center of mass open V bridle with primary and secondary releases.600 tows without a hitch.

It's not rocket science folks. 8 inch piece, single loop with opposing single grapevine knots for solo, 16 inch piece with double loop for tandem.

YMMV
EIGHT INCHES!!! Works flawlessly. It's not rocket science.
Bigger loops have a greater chance of wrapping on something (as pointed out in Hangskier's link)...they should be no longer than necessary.
EIGHT INCHES!!! Industry Standard!

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24534
It's a wrap
Paul Tjaden - 2011/07/30 15:33:54 UTC

Quest Air has been involved in perfecting aerotowing for nearly twenty years.
These people have been perfecting this stuff for nearly twenty years! Stop messing with perfection!
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=25435
Raunchy Day At The Ridge + Release Failure
Andrew Stakhov - 2012/03/05 17:52:10 UTC
Toronto

I remember reading a few posts previously about LMFP type release being extremely difficult to pull under loads. Makes me nervous about flying with one, although I had a few of lockouts myself and didn't experience these problems.

I'm curious how does protowing compare to two point release system. Specially how easy is it to actually grab the release when encountering a lockout scenario, as one would have to let go of the bar with one hand to do so.
-
H3 AT ST FL
WW Sport 2, T2C
I remember reading a few posts previously about LMFP type release being extremely difficult to pull under loads.
Hell, just read the owner's manual of the new improved one.
Makes me nervous about flying with one...
If that doesn't scare you shitless nothing will.
...although I had a few of lockouts myself and didn't experience these problems.
Yeah?
Dynamic Flight - 2005

You should also now be able to understand that the towline forces in a lockout need not be very high. They only need to be sufficiently high to cancel out the effect of a maximum pilot weight shift/yaw in order to cause a continuation and worsening of the situation. Lockouts can and do both occur and continue without ever exceeding normal tow tensions.
So?
Is that how you test your releases? Take them up into potentially deadly air and if you don't get killed they're probably OK?
Goddam thing is required to be operable at twice weak link. Did you test it even to your shitty little loop of fishing line? Just kidding.
I'm curious how does protowing compare to two point release system.
- What idiot signed your AT rating?

EVERYBODY who tows two point has the potential to be a one point tower on EVERY FLIGHT - 'specially the ones configured with weak links and backup releases they way you see them just about all the time. How come that wasn't part of your training?

- So because none of the shitrigged Industry Standard junk can handle a load you're not even gonna look at the link Zack posted and instead start thinking about the shitrigged Industry Standard junk...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21033
barrels release without any tension except weight of rope..
Bart Weghorst - 2011/02/25 19:06:26 UTC

But I've had it once where the pin had bent inside the barrel from excessive tow force. My weaklink was still intact. The tug pilot's weaklink broke so I had the rope. I had to use two hands to get the pin out of the barrel.
No stress because I was high.
...they sell for one point.
Specially how easy is it to actually grab the release when encountering a lockout scenario, as one would have to let go of the bar with one hand to do so.
FORGET HOW EASY IS IT TO ACTUALLY GRAB THE FUCKING RELEASE WHEN ENCOUNTERING A LOCKOUT SCENARIO.
Dennis Pagen - 2005/01

By the time we gained about 60 feet I could no longer hold the glider centered - I was probably at a 20-degree bank - so I quickly released before the lockout to the side progressed. The glider instantly whipped to the side in a wingover maneuver. I cleared the buildings, but came very close to the ground at the bottom of the wingover.
START THINKING ABOUT WHAT THE FUCKING GLIDER'S GONNA DO THE INSTANT YOU TRY TO GRAB THE FUCKING RELEASE WHEN ENCOUNTERING - *OR IN* - A LOCKOUT SCENARIO.
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
by Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"Never take your hands off the bar." - Tom Peghiny
YA SEE THE DATE ON THAT?
That didn't suddenly stop being true the instant Donnell told everybody that it wasn't an issue.
Doug Hildreth - 1991/06

Pilot with some tow experience was towing on a new glider which was a little small for him. Good launch, but at about fifty feet the glider nosed up, stalled, and the pilot released by letting go of the basetube with right hand. Glider did a wingover to the left and crashed into a field next to the tow road. Amazingly, there were minimal injuries.

Comment: This scenario has been reported numerous times. Obviously, the primary problem is the lack of pilot skill and experience in avoiding low-level, post-launch, nose-high stalls. The emphasis by countless reporters that the pilot lets go of the glider with his right hand to activate the release seems to indicate that we need a better hands-on way to release.

I know, I know, "If they would just do it right. Our current system is really okay." I'm just telling you what's going on in the real world. They are not doing it right and it's up to us to fix the problem. Think about it.
And you don't hafta be a crappy pilot...
Joe Gregor - 2004/09

2004/06/26 - Mike Haas - Advanced - 53 - Litesport 147 - W 5 mph, thermally - Hang Glide Chicago - Cushing Field - Sheridan, Illinois

Highly experienced mountain pilot aerotowing a newly-purchased glider experienced a lockout at low altitude. The weak link broke after the glider entered a lockout attitude. Once free, the glider was reportedly too low (50-65' AGL, estimated) to recover and impacted the ground in a steep dive. There is no evidence that the pilot made an attempt to release from tow prior to the weak link break, the gate was found closed on the Wallaby-style tow release.
...to get killed like this. (Although that's how you'll be portrayed in the fatality report.)
...as one would have to let go of the bar with one hand to do so.
Unless...
Antoine Saraf - 2012/02/08 11:13:07 UTC

I made 4-strings (ratio 60) AND remote barrel (ratio 16.4), I love them.
...you paid a little attention to what's going on with stuff outside of the Jack and Davis Shows and just put a fuckin' string in your fuckin' teeth.

Did you even bother glancing at the stuff on the link Zack posted? Just kidding.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=25435
Raunchy Day At The Ridge + Release Failure
Jonathan Boarini - 2012/03/05 18:27:46 UTC
H4, U2 145
Miami

I personally don't agree with the emphasis on not letting go of the bar to release.
And a lot of the people who would most vehemently disagree with you are dead. So you're in pretty good shape in this debate.
I've had numerous lockout situations where I've had to quickly release and the instant it took for me to do it with the normal bicycle release was a non issue, and that design seems to work perfectly under high loads.
Bullshit.

- You didn't have any of those numerous lockout situations down low where they were keeping score 'cause:
-- low level lockouts in dolly launched aerotowing are so rare as to be virtually nonexistent
-- people are really lucky to survive just one of them

- You didn't HAVE TO release quickly 'cause if did...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3391
More on Zapata and weak link
Paul Tjaden - 2008/07/22 04:32:22 UTC

I have never had a lockout situation happen so quickly and dramatically and had no chance to release as I have always thought I could do.
...you wouldn't be talking about how much of a nonissue reaching for some Flight Park Mafia piece o' shit is.

- You were using a Davis Link...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Davis Straub - 2011/08/26 14:04:52 UTC

We had six weaklink breaks in a row at Zapata this year.
...so you don't have the slightest fucking CLUE what what a high load is.

- Oh! That design SEEMS - to you, based upon your all encompassing experience - to work "PERFECTLY" under "high loads". Well I guess we really don't have any real problems that this Industry Standard epitome of human engineering - and all the people perpetually engaged in these discussions while The Industry suppresses all advancement are just paranoid nut cases who really don't appreciate what they have.

- Moron.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=25435
Raunchy Day At The Ridge + Release Failure
Casey Cox - 2012/03/05 21:15:05 UTC

First of all if you say bike release are you referring to the pilot release mechanism or the actual release where the line attaches?
- The release MECHANISM is the spinnaker shackle. And it itself isn't bad. Ya can't be completely stupid and use a weak link that's gonna tie itself to the gate but otherwise...

- The bicycle lever is the release ACTUATOR. Between the mounting location, velcro attachment, limit of travel, and cable bending issues - not to mention parasitic drag - it totally sucks.
From my experience of using both the bike release and old style Bailey which was probably the last in existence that I still have...
Don't worry about it. Just the assholes at Ridgely can punch that crap out at a rate of about a hundred copies an hour.
...and the newer Bailey release that uses a sailboat quick release shackle...
What's this? If it's any good it could very easily make my Barrel Release obsolete.
...as well as the LookOut.
Ooh! I like the way you capitalize that third "O". Puts a more accurate spin on the word. Not quite as good as:
Towing Aloft - 1998/01
APPENDIX IV
Useful Addresses
TOWING ACCESSORIES
Lockout Mountain Flight Park, Rising Fawn, GA (800-688-LMFP) - Towing supplies
but perhaps more encompassing of the whole operation.
The bike release has more leverage to open with more pressure on it.
- Great. So how does it handle TENSION?

- Has anybody given a thought to using a lanyard running inside the port downtube and using a block and tackle system to boost the mechanical advantage - the way every glider designer and his dog does with the VG system?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/aerotowrelease/8319693754/
Image

Just kidding.
However, not only does one have to let go, but most pilots mount the bike release up the downtube so one has to move the hand a fair bit.
No. An actual PILOT would NEVER do anything that incredibly STUPID.
I've had to pull harder on the LookOut release.
How hard and under what ten- sorry - pressure?
However, I had a very low lockout...
WHY? We need to know why this shit happened.
...and with my thumb in the release strap, I release as soon as the lockout started, not waiting to see if I could correct.
- Good.

- But don't think that that's always gonna be enough to keep you alive. Even set up like that and with the release easily handling the tension you can be on your ear before you even have a clue what's going on.

- More times than not you're gonna NEED to correct situations if you wanna go back home in the same shape in which you arrived.
I saved several seconds not having to move my hand so my lockout was really not very dramatic.
Any of you downtube lever douchebags hearing this?
I think some pilots may wait too long to release, causing the release to have a lot of pressure on it from the side.
- NOBODY'S "WAITING" to release from bad situations. They're staying on 'cause they can't get off - and every once in a while shit happens low enough that someone dies.

- If your release can't EASILY handle any angle allowed by your nose wires and any tension allowed by a 1.5 G weak link it's a piece of shit.

- If you're going up with a piece of shit you're not a pilot. REAL pilots don't go up with shit that won't do the job it needs to in order for someone to come back down in good enough shape to go up again next weekend.
I've only had half dozen flights while using protow, but I like it.
Great. Guess you'll probably never need the whole speed range for which the glider was certified. People very rarely do.
I have twin barrel releases...
- Straight or bent pin?
- To what load did you test them?
-- What are you using for weak link material? Just kidding.
-- How long is your bridle and why are you using that length?
-- How many weak links are you using?
...and they are just in front of eye view so I do not have to look down...
GREAT!!!

Should have no trouble at all getting to one...

http://ozreport.com/pub/fingerlakesaccident.shtml
Image
Image

...when the shit hits the fan.
...and my hand reaches in front of my face which I think is safe.
Well yeah. If you THINK it's safe I really can't see much of a problem.

And so what you're saying is that...
I saved several seconds not having to move my hand so my lockout was really not very dramatic.
...there's really not much of an advantage to being able to blow tow with both hands on the basetube resisting the lockout onset and saving several seconds by not having to move your hand.

Well...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1725
Towing at Quest
John Dullahan - 2006/02/07 03:20:14 UTC

With winds of ten to twelve miles per hour I waited for a few minutes for a lull before giving the takeoff signal. Liftoff from the cart was nice and level, but at about ten feet the right wing was suddenly and violently lifted (Paul said a strong thermal came through just as I left the cart and pilots had to hold down their gliders). Almost immediately the glider went into a lockout and the weak link broke just as I hit the release. The high right wing put me into a left turn, so I committed to making a complete 360 back into the wind as the best option. At the 180 point I was about twenty feet over the ground and flying very fast downwind, so to avoid a downwind stall I pulled in slightly then pushed out to gain a little altitude before completing the 360. I almost got it around but couldn't quite pull it off, so the left corner of the control frame dug into the ground taking out the right downtube and fractured a small bone in my wrist (the ulnar styloid).

The incident demonstrated the few options available when towing in winds of 10-12 mph and a wing is suddenly and violently lifted close to the ground - a lockout often ensues very quickly and the glider is pulled into a turn before either the pilot can release or the weak link breaks, and a dangerous situation ensues (flying downwind close to the ground).

With a similar wing lift at a mountain site I think the pilot has more options, such as pulling-in if airspeed is low, or immediately and aggressively high-siding (without having to remove one hand from the base tube to release).
...MAYBE towing TWO point - but definitely not one with a pair of barrels right there in front of your face.

Hey Hang... Are you LISTENING to yourself talking? Are you making any sense?

You're smart enough to know that your two point system is marginal and your one point system is flat out dangerous but you're dumb enough to be trying to convince yourself that it's NOT instead of...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1459
Mouth release
Sergey Kataev - 2006/05/23 16:27:17 UTC

I have aerotowed recently, my first three times. Wasn't allowed to use my mouth release (got the proper type which opens when you open your mouth) because the club uses Wallaby ranch style V-bridle. I've been really worried about releasing in a critical situation.

Also it didn't help my confidence that the particular top release was very hesitant to open - it took about three seconds of squeezing the bicycle brake type lever to open the release.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=70921
Mouth Release . . . Here we go again
Craig Stanley - 2009/06/02 01:24:59 UTC

Sorry to stir this up again, but I wanted to give a quick update on the mouth release. I added another loop into the release and I have to say, I love this thing.

Tension at the mouth is low and comfortable. Locking it off with the sliding barrel at altitude is quite simple. Releasing couldn't be easier.

Yesterday I was hit with a quarter side/tailwind off the cart. I got really high and to the left of the tug. I was pulling in and turning back to the right to get in line with the tug, but the tug was unable to climb fast enough and I could not dive fast enough. By just opening my mouth, I was free of the tug. I did not have to take my hands off the bar and let the glider get in a worse AoA or turn.

I'm sure my release is not the best one out there (I think the mouth-throttle version is good as well), but I strongly believe having a mouth release adds a lot of safety to towing from the chest.
Antoine Saraf - 2012/02/08 11:13:07 UTC

I made 4-strings (ratio 60) AND remote barrel (ratio 16.4), I love them.
...DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT.
I added another loop into the release and I have to say, I love this thing.
I made 4-strings AND remote barrel, I love them.
Have you ever heard someone claim to love a Bailey Release? I mean besides some asshole who's trying to sell you a Bailey Release?
I have the long barrel release and not the short ones.
Oh! So somebody else FINALLY figured out that the barrel should be fitted to the pilot's hand instead of the fucking pin. And it just took a bit over twenty years. Who? What shape is the pin? Is there some glimmer of hope for the top 0.01 percent of humanity?
It seems to me I have more control of the glider due to there is no force pulling on it except though my harness.
- Yeah, in normal circumstances, you DO. But most people want the towline to have some control of the glider too so they don't hafta work to keep the glider down behind the tug. And notice that:

-- they don't put trainees up one point 'cause that gives them more control of the glider.

-- the primary reasons that people choose to fly one point are because all the Industry Standard two point releases are draggy dangerous pieces of crap that only work three quarters of the time if you're lucky and they're protected by a weak link so light that you can only get to altitude about two out of three times.

- But if the glider's going up like a rocket and you need to get the nose down when you're towing one point you can be lethally screwed.
Do you ever look at your release prior to grabbing or do you know where it is?
NO!!! I've got the fuckin' string between my fuckin' teeth. I don't hafta look at or grab ANYTHING. Why does this seem to be such a difficult concept to grasp.
That to me is the biggest advantage of protow.
The Herald on Sunday - 2009/01/10

Hurt hang glider pilot joked bravely with friends after a crash landing, unaware that his injuries were fatal.

But he began losing consciousness as he awaited the arrival of paramedics.

Elliot shattered four bones in his neck and damaged several blood vessels that supplied blood to the brain. He was flown to the Royal North Shore Hospital in Sydney and put into an induced coma but died on Monday.
I wonder if Steve Elliot was thinking that while he was bravely joking with friends after his crash takeoff, unaware that his injuries were fatal.
Zack C
Site Admin
Posts: 292
Joined: 2010/11/23 01:31:08 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Zack C »

Tad Eareckson wrote:EIGHT INCHES!!! Industry Standard!
I used to make them eight inches until you told me I should make them smaller, so I know how big of a loop that makes, and I see lots of guys making them much bigger.

Gotta say, this is the first I've heard of a wrap on a nose wire.
Tad Eareckson wrote:The bicycle lever is the release ACTUATOR. Between the mounting location, velcro attachment, limit of travel, and cable bending issues - not to mention parasitic drag - it totally sucks.
That borrowed glider I mentioned I flew earlier had a Wallaby release. First time I ever used one. I gotta say, I like the mechanical advantage the lever gives you. I don't see how it could be mounted in a way that would satisfy me, though, and then there are the reports of failures...

Zack
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

I used to make them eight inches...
One of the stupidest things I ever did in this game - along with assuming Donnell had a clue what he was talking about and believing Chad when he told me that a loop of 130 pound Greenspot blew at 260 and anything over that would start stressing the glider - was assume that that secondary / one point bridles were made the lengths they were for some sane reason.

My first effort was somewhat shorter than the rest of the crap - maybe a foot and a half - but after a couple months of flying I started noticing that only a one or two centimeter section in the center was getting discolored by the thimble.
Gotta say, this is the first I've heard of a wrap on a nose wire.
Me too. The glider must've been a lot more yawed than rolled.

Ferchrisake don't tell Peter Birren. He'll use this once in a couple million incident, which wouldn't have happened anyway if Terry hadn't been using a Tjaden Link, as indisputable proof of the unacceptably high danger involved in releasing from the keel instead running a string from a shoulder out to a Linknife in front of a Hewett Bridle apex - while, of course, ignoring all the people, himself included, who've been half or fully killed 'cause they couldn't get to the string or barrel on the shoulder when the shit hit the fan. We'll never hear the end of it.
That borrowed glider I mentioned I flew earlier had a Wallaby release.
And I can't get you to bank to sixty or drill a hole in the top of your left downtube?
First time I ever used one.
That's one thing you've got in your logbook that I don't. Make it your last. If the glider were capable of being towed one point without me needing to hold forty pounds of basetube pressure the whole way up I'd go up with just a pair of barrels before I'd have a Wallaby velcroed on.
I gotta say, I like the mechanical advantage the lever gives you.
A lot of which is being used to overcome the resistance of the cable necessary to connect it in the first place.
I don't see how it could be mounted in a way that would satisfy me...
It can't. That's why people always mount them in a way that doesn't satisfy them...
There is no evidence that the pilot made an attempt to release from tow prior to the weak link break, the gate was found closed on the Wallaby-style tow release.
...and occasionally gets them killed.
...and then there are the reports of failures...
And also occasional reports of successes.

You want accessibility, efficiency, mechanical advantage, and reliability... Do it the way they do they do the VG - line, pulleys, block and tackle.
Steve Davy
Posts: 1338
Joined: 2011/07/18 10:37:38 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Steve Davy »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=992
Continuing Saga of Weak Link and Release Mechanism Failures
miguel - 2012/03/05 19:40:32 UTC

Tad will continue to be a footnote unless he stops striking out at others. His message is obscured by his aggression.
Not from my point of view. I have learned a bunch since finding Kitestrings. Lessons in common sense, decency, history, human nature and integrity. I've learned some stuff about hang gliding as well.
miguel
Posts: 289
Joined: 2011/05/27 16:21:08 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by miguel »

Nobody wrote:
miguel - 2012/03/05 19:40:32 UTC

Tad will continue to be a footnote unless he stops striking out at others. His message is obscured by his aggression.
Not from my point of view. I have learned a bunch since finding Kitestrings. Lessons in common sense, decency, history, human nature and integrity. I've learned some stuff about hang gliding as well.
I also have learned much in this forum. I overlook and discount the bile and venom. Many folks see the bile and venom and click away, never to return. Do you think those that click away, leave with a good impression?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=992
Continuing Saga of Weak Link and Release Mechanism Failures
Warren Narron - 2012/03/06 02:26:04 UTC

Tad, used to post about as nice as anyone, and nicer than some. Remember?

Blowback... You put in a thousand plus hour$, tooling, te$ting and documenting safety issues for the masses and have it ignored and suppressed by people, for whatever reason, and you would get testy too.
You're fairly snarky as it is, and you haven't done the work...

And you may be correct about the footnote... but today's footnotes are now hyperlinks...

There is a good chance that from now on, for every incident and fatality caused by insufficient weaklinks or sub-standard release mechanisms, a hyperlink trail will lead back to Tadtriedtowarnyou.com ... where all the evidence can be found.

A further link could then go to a list of all the people and the role they played in the suppression of those safety issues...
Who would like to be on that list?
How many are already on it?
Post Reply