Weak links

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26870
weak links
Zack C - 2012/08/17 21:09:03 UTC

Paul (pjwings, that is),

I think you have the right general idea, but I have to correct and clarify some things. I say 'think' because I can only speak for the side I'm on. I have a hard time getting the other side to tell me when a weak link should break or what its breaking strength should be (as you might have been able to tell).
Based on several decades of experience and hundreds of thousands of tows conducted by numerous aerotow operators across the county, the de facto standard has become use of a 260 pound weak link made as a loop of 130 pound Greenspot IGFA Dacron braided fishing line attached to one end of the pilot's V-bridle. It is a de facto standard, because it works for most pilots and gliders and is usually near the USHPA recommendation of a nominal one G weak link for most pilots.

The expectation of performance is that they break as early as possible in lockout situations, but be strong and reliable enough to avoid frequent weak link breaks from turbulence. It is the same expectation of performance that is had for the weak links used for towing sailplanes.

I don't know how much more clearly this can be stated.
Weak links should break during lockout...
Stronger weak links will still break during a lockout if the pilot doesn't release. It will just take slightly longer.
Antoine Saraf - 2012/05/25 19:45:39 UTC

I miss opportunity to be aerotowed in my mountains but 2 months ago we spent 4 days teaching AT to 12 pilots in 2 points. All had 190kg weaklink (220kg on tug side).
One of them oscillate and start to lockout. I said by radio : (time to) release, he did it (JoeStreet release), but 1ms to late.. the weaklink was just blowed.
and no unexpected wl failure in 90 AT.
I'm confident in this way to think wl..
VERY slightly in a rapidly progressing lockout.
Weak links should never break unless the glider and/or tug is about to fail structurally.
I wouldn't say 'about to fail'...they should break well below that to leave a safe margin. I'd say they should break well above anything that would normally be encountered on tow but well below what would break the aircraft. That allows a pretty big range.
But if you're flying an Industry Standard release you don't want the towline tension to be allowed to exceed about 200 pounds.
This is because a weak link that is any weaker may break at random, unpredictable times and that is very dangerous.
Weak link breaks are usually nothing more than inconveniences.
Very expensive inconveniences - even if you don't trash a downtube.
But with just the right combination of factors they could be much worse.
Which always includes a crappy pilot who deserves whatever happens to him.

Interesting how when a crappy pilot like Dan Veneman flies into a tree...

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=408846695830285
14-720
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2948/15310286467_507b010b07_o.png
Image
Image
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3935/15493716721_dde8c73f48_o.png
19-817

...and half kills himself there are scores of calls to take a chainsaw to it but when a crappy pilot like Bryan Bowker blows a weak link...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYe3YmdIQTM


...and breaks his arm into four pieces the calls for beefing up the piece of fishing line to something sustainable are virtually nonexistent.
...a weak link that is weak enough to break during lockout...
Lockouts only matter near the ground (at altitude, the weak link, no matter how strong it is, will break and the glider recover if the pilot doesn't release). If a lockout occurs near the ground, you do not want to rely on any weak link to save you. If it's strong enough to get you to altitude, it's strong enough to permit a very bad attitude that could be catastrophic near the ground (as illustrated by the earlier video I posted).
This is why you should roll the glider and push out as soon and hard as possible to blow the weak link and thus terminate the lockout as soon as possible.
That's why they say the weak link isn't there to protect the pilot.
Depends a lot on...
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

Speed controlled towing is when the speed of the device doing the towing is maintained at a reasonably constant value. Controls, such as throttle, are used to keep the speed of the tow vehicle or tow winch operating at a constant speed. Towline tension can vary dramatically in response to thermals, sink, pilot corrections, etc. Aerotowing is clearly in this category as the tug needs to maintain a minimum speed to prevent stalling. Many of the early towing efforts of the '70s where the vehicle drove at a fixed speed would also fall into this category. Weak links very clearly will provide protection from excessive angles of attack, high bank turns and the like for this form of towing.
...which they you're listening to.
For any given lockout that ends in a weak link break, there's a breaking altitude below which the pilot will not be able to prevent a crash. If you use a stronger weak link, that altitude will be a little higher.
Not necessarily. You can be climbing while progressing into a lockout. Then the math's gonna get a bit tricky.

And let's not forget that there are THREE ways a lockout can be terminated.

- Release actuation is always the fastest and produces the most satisfactory results - provided, of course, that the person flying the glider isn't stupid enough to get on the cart with a release that stinks on ice.

- Weak link failure works OK - for those with the luxury of adequate altitude.

- Imact with the surface can often do the job a lot faster than the weak link. The weak link WILL blow at that point - and there's no nasty stall to worry about afterwards.

There's no law of physics which states that a weak link of any rating high enough to get a glider airborne has gotta blow before the glider slams in. Debbie Young, Robin Strid, and Steve Elliot have all demonstrated that pretty conclusively.
Using the weaker weak link will only matter if the lockout occurs between those two altitudes, so you'd basically be gambling that at some point you'll need it to break in this range in exchange for a much greater chance of it breaking at a bad time.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Marc Fink - 2011/08/28 21:11:09 UTC

The weaklink blew and the glider stalled--needed every bit of the 250 ft agl to speed up and pull out. I'm alive because I didn't use a stronger one.
250 feet is the generally accepted minimal survival altitude for Industry Standard equipment.
Marc Fink - 2011/08/31 08:11:05 UTC

This all happened in a few seconds. I was actually in the process of reaching for the release and just about to pull it when the weaklink blew. If procedures were amended to "insist" on stronger weaklinks I would simply stop towing.
The really anal pilot who desires to survive lockouts below that figure has two options...

- A hundred pound test loop of fishing line will limit lockout recovery altitude to a maximum of 192 feet and allow one to get to release altitude about one out of four attempts.

- After a good Cone of Safety training course the pilot will understand that if he stays within twenty degrees of straight behind the tug he will be immune to lockouts.

There are a few wack jobs who advocate using equipment that doesn't require a few seconds and a reach to blow oneself off tow but none of it is Industry Standard with a huge track record and all if it is completely untested and very experimental gear which will likely fail in new and unforeseen ways as it tries its damnedest to kill you.
Jim Gaar - 2012/08/17 22:12:29 UTC

This is GOLDEN for all of us that tow (I tow a lot on a PL rig). It holds true for ANY towing system. Zack you are doing a great job of shining the light on the weaklink issues. It's really that simple to me. I am going to start using 205 leech. I was using 4 strands of 130 kite string (standard AT stuff). Thanks
Fuck you.
Zack C - 2012/08/17 23:25:41 UTC
It holds true for ANY towing system.
The purpose of the weak link is the same for any tow method, but what you quoted is not entirely applicable to payout winch towing because it's tension controlled. While a weak link will eventually break at some point in the course of an aerotow lockout, this is generally not the case on a payout winch because the drum will just pay out faster rather than allow tension to increase. It thus makes even less sense to use lighter weak links with payout winch towing.
C'mon Zack...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=18868
Almost lockout
Ryan Voight - 2010/09/07 02:50:00 UTC

Weak link in truck towing WILL (read: should) still break in a lockout situation... but as everyone has already pointed out, it takes a lot longer because the glider can continue to pull line off the winch.

There is a limit to how fast line can come off the winch though... so the forces still build up, and the weaklink still fails.
It'll break.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/25 04:55:25 UTC

It always amazes to hear know it all pilots arguing with the professional pilots.
(It always amazes to hear know it all weekend warriors arguing with the professional pilots.)
I am going to start using 205 leech. I was using 4 strands of 130 kite string (standard AT stuff).
For AT or PL? How many strands of 205? At the end of a V bridle or directly engaging the towline?

Four strands of 130 will break around 200 lbs (not the 520 often assumed).

Here in Houston we use four strands (two loops) of 205 leech line directly engaging the towline for platform towing. We've tested this configuration to break around 600 lbs.
Thanks
No problem.
I got more than a few problems with that asshole.
Paul Edwards - 2012/08/18 00:55:41 UTC

Thanks Zack! That clarifies it well.
Tad Eareckson - 2012/03/13 21:06:14 UTC
Paul Edwards - 2012/03/13 12:25:45 UTC

Plus it'd be great to fly together again.
Ooh! Somebody likes Zack! (I wonder what it's like to be liked by a Jack Show diver.)

Maybe Zack can get through to him on something and get him to pass it on to someone else.
Seems like a very subtle difference to raise such ire.
Dr. Trisa Tilletti 1 - 2012/06

Unlike the FAA's relatively clear-cut legal rules, the practical aspects of weak link technology and application are not so clear-cut. For some people, talking about weak links is more like talking about religion, politics, or global warming--they can get very emotional about it and have difficulty discussing it logically, rationally, or with civility.
Dr. Trisa Tilletti 2 - 2012/06

So let's try to talk about it rationally, logically, and practically here.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26302
HIGHER EDUCATION ?
NMERider - 2012/06/06 03:25:09 UTC

You are being much too complimentary IMHO. I got so nauseated reading it I had to take a breather. Do you mean to tell me they wrote an article that wasn't insipid and self-congratulatory to the extreme? I've found their entire series on aerotowing to come off rather poorly to say the least. A sad waste of such exalted and highly qualified medical professionals. How do I know this? Well they won't stop patting each other on the back about how great they both are. Pardon me while I puke. Image
The ire arises from over three decades of operating under Donnell Hewett's lunatic assumptions and pronouncements about the "purposes" of and parameters for the weak link, the incompetence and lying involved in perpetuating said lunacy, and the waste and carnage which has resulted.
Either way unplanned breaks are possible. Either way the weak link will pop long before the aircraft does. It just comes down to a matter of degree... And which set of variables a pilot is most comfortable towing with.
Fuck that. REAL pilots don't have COMFORT levels with respect to weak links, parachutes, or unhooked launch recovery procedures. You need any, some, or all of the above, you've screwed one or more pooches and you're REAL fucking uncomfortable - and you're life expectancy at that point may be REAL short.

http://www.aviationbanter.com/archive/index.php/t-40965.html
Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?
Bill Daniels - 2006/09/18 14:30

Actually, reading the Pilot's Operating Handbook for several German gliders, I note the weak link for aerotow is specified as an exact figure. For example, the weak link for both aero tow and winch for my Nimbus 2C is specified as 600 KG (1323 Lbs) or a blue Tost weak link.
Sailplane owner's manuals specify the weak link appropriate for the particular glider - and they don't say anything about the idiot pilot's goddam comfort level or its length.
Zack C - 2012/08/18 01:16:26 UTC

I suspect nearly all pilots using a good release...
All four of them.
...and following USHPA's weak link recommendation...
Which is to use a 260 pound loop of 130 pound Greenspot rather than a 130 pound loop of 130 pound Greenspot.
...will never see a weak link break - just as in the sailplane world.
Only if they also use fins and have had tandem Cone of Safety training.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26870
weak links
Jim Gaar - 2012/08/18 04:33:30 UTC
It thus makes even less sense to use lighter weak links with payout winch towing.
Exactly. I was going to say that with the payout you just keep on locking out as the weak link fails to pop.
Are you QUITE SURE about that, Jim?

I have it on the best of authority...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=18868
Almost lockout
Ryan Voight - 2010/09/07 02:50:00 UTC

Weak link in truck towing WILL (read: should) still break in a lockout situation... but as everyone has already pointed out, it takes a lot longer because the glider can continue to pull line off the winch.

There is a limit to how fast line can come off the winch though... so the forces still build up, and the weaklink still fails.
...that, because there is a limit to how fast line can come off the winch, the forces still build up and the weak link still fails.
We are all about the PIC releasing BEFORE anything gets too out of whack.
The instant you take your hand off the basetube to blow a release that stinks on ice...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/skysailingtowing/message/6726
Weaklinks
Peter Birren - 2008/10/27 23:41:49 UTC

So you pull whatever release you have but the one hand still on the basetube isn't enough to hold the nose down and you pop up and over into an unplanned semi-loop.
...you cease being the Pilot In Command and become a passenger on an unpiloted aircraft.
And if it does finally break you get a whip stall maybe or you just end up low, fast and going downwind!
So if the tow tension suddenly goes to zero...
Wills Wing / Blue Sky / Steve Wendt / Ryan Voight Productions - 2007/03

NEVER CUT THE POWER...

Image

Reduce Gradually
Increase Gradually
...you could end up with results like this:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8143/7462005802_bbc0ac66ac_o.jpg
Image

Probably not. I have it on the best of authority...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=18868
Almost lockout
Ryan Voight - 2010/09/07 02:50:00 UTC

If things get out of whack, the tow operator can dump line tension and allow the pilot to fly away from the lockout (with the rope, until they release it).
...that if things get out of whack, the tow operator can dump line tension and allow the pilot to fly away from the lockout (with the rope, until he releases it).
For AT or PL? How many strands of 205? At the end of a V bridle or directly engaging the towline?
For PL. At least three at the end of my 3 string release, directly engaging the towline loop.
Four strands of 130 will break around 200 lbs (not the 520 often assumed).
Yes I have personal experience with that knowledge. ;)

Image
Zack C
Site Admin
Posts: 292
Joined: 2010/11/23 01:31:08 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Zack C »

Tad Eareckson wrote:Which is to use a 260 pound loop of 130 pound Greenspot rather than a 130 pound loop of 130 pound Greenspot.
Nothin' in the SOPs about 130 or Greenspot!

Zack
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26870
weak links
Steve Seibel - 2012/08/18 16:22:36 UTC
Willamette Valley, Oregon

The ideas below seem well stated. I use that greenstripe stuff, what is it, 130 pound test, for the weak links on a 3 point (shoulders and keel) aerotow setup. I'm fairly light and fly smaller gliders. I don't have a lot of time towing in REALLY rowdy air but all my weak link breaks have been in severe lockouts as far as I can recall. The most recent one, last winter, put a heck of a load on the glider, more than I would ever intentionally allow. The high G-load made it harder to for me to get my hand quickly to the release, and the glider rolled to quite a steep bank, and the loads rose much higher than I intended before I hit the handle. I thought I did release but the weak link must have broken just as I pressed the handle, because the weak link was found to be broken after landing. The weak link did its job. The glider didn't break. Down low, I would have initiated reaching for the release much sooner-I hope! - or else I would have slammed into the ground steeply banked either shortly before or after the weak link broke. A weak link should break in a lockout eventually, but if it is strong enough not to constantly breaking in turbulence, it seems unrealistic to expect it to break until the lockout is rather well along in progress.

Based on my cumulative experience so far I would opt for a SLIGHTLY weaker weak link (those loads got alarmingly high!). A heavier pilot towing with pro tow would need a somewhat heavier link for the same breaking load factor.

How to adjust for variations in pilot weight and glider size?

Perhaps best to simply adjust according to the max pilot weight allowed for the wing, and for style of tow bridle, and nothing else? On any given wing with a given weak link, a heavier pilot will tend to experience a weak link break at a lower g-load in turbulence, but turbulent gusts will also impose fewer g's on the heavier pilot, and with either pilot, the wing will end up being limited to the same total load as expressed in pounds rather than G-loading, it seems to me...
Zack C - 2012/08/17 21:09:03 UTC

Lockouts only matter near the ground...
The ideas below seem well stated.
They are.

- Do you have any fucking clue how many billions of times they've been well stated before in the three decades since Donnell Hewett ascribed powers of judgment and compassion to the weak link?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8441
Calculating Weak Link strengths
Steven Seibel - 2007/06/29 17:55:24 UTC

I tend to think your "jihadi" is on the right track. And even if not, there's a lot of very good food for thought in that thread. Weak link breaks should be rare in the hang gliding world, like they are in the sailplane world - where they usually mean someone screwed up and didn't notice the knot in the rope, or the abrasions on the rope, etc. Instead they are common.
- They're EXACTLY the same ideas your Friendly Neighborhood Jihadi was stating over five years ago when you were commenting on them.

- How come when Rooney's been writing his volumes of absolute crap here and on The Davis Show you haven't told him he's totally full of shit and told Davis to go fuck himself for protecting him?
I use that greenstripe stuff...
You use that GreenSPOT stuff.
...what is it, 130 pound test, for the weak links...
Maybe.
- Why?
- So how come you're not sure?
- What were you told its blow point was?
- Did you test it yourself to find out that it actually DOESN'T blow at 260 pounds?
...on a 3 point (shoulders and keel) aerotow setup.
On a TWO point (pilot and glider) aerotow setup.
I'm fairly light and fly smaller gliders.
Can you be more specific?
I don't have a lot of time towing in REALLY rowdy air but all my weak link breaks have been in severe lockouts as far as I can recall.
- In other words, you'd have been killed several times over had these severe lockouts not occurred at safe altitudes.
- So what was stopping you from releasing before the lockouts became severe?
The most recent one, last winter, put a heck of a load on the glider, more than I would ever intentionally allow.
- Can you express that in Gs?

- What percentage of the load was attributable to the tow tension and what percentage was attributable to the Gs you were pulling as a consequence of the roll?

- So what was stopping you from releasing before the lockout became severe?
The high G-load made it harder to for me to get my hand quickly to the release...
Oh.
...and the glider rolled to quite a steep bank, and the loads rose much higher than I intended before I hit the handle.
http://vimeo.com/33381400


But you still don't think it's totally fucking moronic to go up with with some Industry Standard piece of shit which uses a brake lever velcroed to a downtube?
I thought I did release but the weak link must have broken just as I pressed the handle, because the weak link was found to be broken after landing.
No. The weak link was shredded by the spinnaker shackle gate as it cleared. This happens frequently during releases during which it's loaded to near max. You nick it under that much tension - it's toast.
The weak link did its job. The glider didn't break.
A weak link four times the strength of what you were using would've done that job exactly the same.
Down low, I would have initiated reaching for the release much sooner-I hope!
Down low you'd have done the math and realized that you were gonna die whether you released or not but could survive two seconds longer torqueing the bar for all you were worth without interruption.

The tow operator would've written a fatality report stating that you didn't have a lot of time towing in really rowdy air and that, instead of getting off at the first sign of a problem you tried to save a bad situation, froze up and made no effort to release, and paid a really heavy price for your poor judgment and mediocre towing skills.

If you had been using a 150 pound weak link you'd have also been criticized for using dangerous nonstandard equipment.
...or else I would have slammed into the ground steeply banked either shortly before or after the weak link broke.
Joe Gregor - 2004/09

The weak link broke after the glider entered a lockout attitude. Once free, the glider was reportedly too low (50-65' AGL, estimated) to recover from the unusual attitude and impacted the ground in a steep dive. The pilot suffered fatal injuries due to blunt trauma. There is no evidence that the pilot made an attempt to release from tow prior to the weak link break, the gate was found closed on the Wallaby-style tow release.
You'd have slammed into the ground steeply banked either shortly before or after the weak link broke - just like a lot of other people before you who've spent their towing careers deluding themselves into believing that they'll be able to deal with one of the most critical emergency situations that can be encountered in the sport of hang gliding flying with one hand.
A weak link should break in a lockout eventually, but if it is strong enough not to constantly breaking in turbulence...
Forget not breaking in turbulence. If you launch into a thermal, the way Dennis Pagen and the German fatality on which he reported did, and get blasted up in a manner similar to THIS:

http://vimeo.com/33381400


at what G rating would you prefer to have your weak link blow?
...it seems unrealistic to expect it to break until the lockout is rather well along in progress.
Watch Zack blowing one of your weak links as a consequence of his crappy piloting skills:

http://vimeo.com/17472550

password - red
2-1306
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7258/13851486814_77efdf1004_o.png
Image

Now watch the protection from excessive angles of attack, high bank turns, and the like it very clearly provides for this form of towing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27yFcEMpfMk


And bear in mind that she blows her release before her Greenspot is fully stressed out.
Are you comfortable with that degree of roll/lockout protection for shit happening near the ground?
Based on my cumulative experience so far...
Fuck your cumulative experience so far. Only total morons base their decisions on their cumulative experience so far. People who have their shit together base their decisions, equipment, and procedures on mathematical models, worst case scenarios, and crash and fatality reports. Your goddam cumulative experience so far is NOTHING compared to what was known and experienced long before you ever got anywhere NEAR a fucking hang glider.
...I would opt for a SLIGHTLY weaker weak link...
Probably wouldn't wanna go up to the kinds of loads...

http://ozreport.com/3.066
Weaklinks
Davis Straub - 1999/06/06

A few weeks later I was speaking with Rhett Radford at Wallaby Ranch about weaklinks and the issue of more powerful engines, and he felt that stronger weaklinks (unlike those used at Wallaby or Quest) were needed. He suggested between five and ten pounds of additional breaking strength.
...Rhett Radford is suggesting. I'd dial things up about two to four pounds and take about a hundred flights to see if that breaks my glider or decreases lockout protection unreasonably.
...(those loads got alarmingly high!)
Those loads you felt were a consequence of the high banked turn the turbulence and subsequent towline tension misalignment put you into.

The weak link you were using is so fucking understrength that shit like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlIGsgNFRWM


happens ALL THE TIME.

http://ozreport.com/12.080
No one makes it back - Santa Cruz Flats Race, day two
Davis Straub - 2008/04/22 06:02:32 UTC

I was not the only one breaking weaklinks as it seemed for a while every third pilot was having this problem.
A heavier pilot towing with pro tow would need a somewhat heavier link for the same breaking load factor.
- There's no such thing as "pro tow".

- This issue doesn't have shit to do with pilot weight. It's ENTIRELY about GLIDER CAPACITY.

- To maintain the same max towline tension with a weak link on the end of a one point bridle you knock about thirteen percent OFF of the one on the two point. You don't INCREASE the strength - despite the crap you might've read from Davis and Tracy.
How to adjust for variations in pilot weight and glider size?
You don't. You look ONLY at glider CAPACITY.
Perhaps best to simply adjust according to the max pilot weight allowed for the wing...
Yes. Just like it says in the fucking FAA regulations.
...and for style of tow bridle...
- Those aren't STYLES. They're CONFIGURATIONS.
- Yes, but the opposite of what you're saying.
...and nothing else?
Correct. NOTHING ELSE.
On any given wing with a given weak link, a heavier pilot will tend to experience a weak link break at a lower g-load in turbulence...
- Jerky turbulence or smooth lockouts - it doesn't matter.
- Yes, but we're not concerned with the G loading on the PILOT. We're concerned about the stress on the GLIDER.
...but turbulent gusts will also impose fewer g's on the heavier pilot, and with either pilot, the wing will end up being limited to the same total load as expressed in pounds rather than G-loading, it seems to me...
Jesus H. Keeriste. YES. But do you hafta make this exercise such a fucking overcomplicated headache?

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26713
First attempts at Aerotowing.
Steve Seibel - 2012/07/28 05:21:27 UTC

I learned aerotow by tandem. Probably a good thing, as it took me a few flights to get the hang of it. Even with much prior sailplane aerotow experience.
You have a sailplane background. Didn't they cover this shit before they gave you your ticket?

- We're operating under sailplane rules which specify a legal range of 0.8 to 2.0 times the maximum certified operating weight of the fucking glider.

- The fucking glider can take six Gs pretty easy.

- If we shoot for the middle of the legal range we will - for all practical purposes - limit the stress to which the glider can be subjected on tow to about half that.

- We're not gonna break or bend the glider. No glider has ever been broken or bent under positive tow loading in the history of modern hang glider towing. We don't need to do this shit with a magnifying glass and a fine toothed comb. Put a one and a half G weak link on your glider and fly the goddam thing.
The high G-load made it harder to for me to get my hand quickly to the release, and the glider rolled to quite a steep bank, and the loads rose much higher than I intended before I hit the handle.
With the VOLUMES that have been written about the critical importance of having the fucking release being triggerable with both hands on the fucking basetube since the days of standards in the early Seventies the concept is TOTALLY FOREIGN to you. What cave have you been living in?

Even with that goddam miserable piece of fishing line you're using for a weak link - which, you've discovered, can still put you into an abrupt, brutal, deadly lockout YOU'VE JUST STATED that:
- You could release faster - and thus with less roll and stress - if you were using a release that DIDN'T stink on ice.
- The more dangerous the situation the less likely you are to be able to use that Wallaby piece of shit you have to get back out of it.

You give a goddam ten year old kid a spinnaker shackle, some leechline, and twelve bucks to spend at the hardware store and he's gonna be able to figure out how to rig a both hands on the basetube two point aerotow release system on a glider.
The high G-load made it harder to for me to get my hand quickly to the release, and the glider rolled to quite a steep bank, and the loads rose much higher than I intended before I hit the handle.
You get into a situation like that down low where it matters your Industry Standard release, standard aerotow weak link, and Jack and Davis Show posting privileges and the ten thousand pages worth of information you've written on the aerodynamics of hang glider flying and control won't do you any more good than a warm bucket of piss.
Zack C
Site Admin
Posts: 292
Joined: 2010/11/23 01:31:08 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Zack C »

Good stuff, Tad. Hope you don't mind the blatant plagiarism in my response. :D

Zack
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Careful. There's probably a limit to the number of Tad clone charges you can withstand before being accused of being Tad and banned - the way "Newton" was at the end of February.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26870
weak links
Zack C - 2012/08/19 15:08:52 UTC
Steve Seibel - 2012/08/18 16:22:36 UTC

A weak link should break in a lockout eventually, but if it is strong enough not to constantly breaking in turbulence, it seems unrealistic to expect it to break until the lockout is rather well along in progress.
It is unrealistic to expect any weak link to break before a lockout is rather well along in progress. The pilot in the scenario below released - the weak link never broke.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27yFcEMpfMk


But don't bet a stronger weak link will make that much of a difference anyway.
deltaman - 2012/05/25 19:45:39 UTC

I miss opportunity to be aerotowed in my mountains but 2 months ago we spent 4 days teaching AT to 12 pilots in 2 points. All had 190kg weaklink (220kg on tug side).
One of them oscillate and start to lockout. I said by radio : (time to) release, he did it (JoeStreet release), but 1ms to late.. the weaklink was just blowed.
and no unexpected wl failure in 90 AT.
I'm confident in this way to think wl..
Once tension starts to spike in a lockout it will spike quickly. But near the ground you may already be past the point of survival by the time that happens - regardless of your weak link breaking strength. As much as we'd love to believe otherwise, there is no direct relationship between towline tension and desirability of being off tow. That is why we cannot expect the weak link to do anything other than protect the glider from overloading by excessive tension.
I dunno...
Donnell Hewett - 1985/04

And concerning the three other USA fatalities - those involving beginner/novices and apparent lockouts - I would like to know what these inexperienced pilots were doing at altitudes high enough to lockout? Were they being pulled so fast that a lockout which started at only at 3 to 6 ft forced them into an arc high enough to roll over? If so, why were they being pulled so fast? What strength of weak link were they using that it didn't break when being pulled that fast?
Seems to be some controversy about that issue.
I thought I did release but the weak link must have broken just as I pressed the handle, because the weak link was found to be broken after landing.
What you're describing is not uncommon with spinnaker releases. The gate stresses the weak link during release, especially under high loads. It's likely it broke because you released.
That notch acts kinda like a Linknife on the weak link. It almost always does a little damage to the weak link on routine releases but the more it's loaded the:
- more damage it does; and
- less the string is gonna be able to withstand damage without a cascade effect kicking in.
The weak link did its job. The glider didn't break.
The weak link could have been far stronger and it still would have done its job.
In the total absence of weak links and a tow mast breakaway you could probably pull the tug out of the sky without bending the glider. Think of the glider as a 160 square foot, six plus G, smoothly loaded drag chute.
But you seem to think it has another job - that of a release.
Must've read Dr. Trisa Tilletti's article in the June issue of Hang Gliding.
A heavier pilot towing with pro tow would need a somewhat heavier link for the same breaking load factor.
Not that you stated otherwise, but a pilot towing one point ('pro tow') will need a weaker weak link than when he's towing two (three) point to achieve the same tension limit.
He pretty much stated it. No jury in the country would let him walk on that one.
How to adjust for variations in pilot weight and glider size?
If you understand what a weak link is for, you would understand this question is flawed. You only need to adjust for variations in gliders' load capacity - just like the FAA tells you.
What does the FAA know? Hang gliders don't have actual load capacities - just recommended maximum hook-in weights.
Now to the heart of this matter...
The high G-load made it harder to for me to get my hand quickly to the release...
Based on my cumulative experience so far I would opt for a SLIGHTLY weaker weak link...
Maybe you should instead opt for a release you don't have to reach for.
Why? The USHGA Towing Committee - which has ALWAYS had only the highest concern for the safety of the pilot in all of its actions - has stated in the SOPs:
A release must be placed at the hang glider end of the tow line within easy reach of the pilot.
And he's GOT an Industry Standard Wallaby Release - with a HUGE track record - right there on his starboard downtube within EXTREMELY easy reach. It's right there where eminently qualified tandem pilots like Lauren Tjaden...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3107
I have a tandem rating!!!
Lauren Tjaden - 2008/03/23 22:20:15 UTC

When Jim got me locked out to the right, I couldn't keep the pitch of the glider with one hand for more than a second (the pressure was a zillion pounds, more or less)...
...always put them. Not just ordinary eminently qualified tandem pilots, but eminently qualified tandem pilots from QUEST AIR...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24534
It's a wrap
Paul Tjaden - 2011/07/30 15:33:54 UTC

Quest Air has been involved in perfecting aerotowing for nearly twenty years.
...which has been involved in perfecting aerotowing for nearly twenty years.

And if that perfect Industry Standard release doesn't work...
Lauren Tjaden - 2008/03/23 22:20:15 UTC

...but the F'ing release slid around when I tried to hit it.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=11497
Aerotow release options?
Axel Banchero - 2009/06/20 04:57:01 UTC

I just kept hitting the brake lever for a few seconds in WTF mode...
There's also an Industry Standard backup release...
Lauren Tjaden - 2008/03/23 22:20:15 UTC

The barrel release wouldn't work because we had too much pressure on it.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21033
barrels release without any tension except weight of rope..
Bart Weghorst - 2011/02/25 19:06:26 UTC

I've had it once where the pin had bent inside the barrel from excessive tow force. My weaklink was still intact. The tug pilot's weaklink broke so I had the rope. I had to use two hands to get the pin out of the barrel.
No stress because I was high.
...with a huge track record...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3391
More on Zapata and weak link
Paul Tjaden - 2008/07/22 04:32:22 UTC

I have never had a lockout situation happen so quickly and dramatically and had no chance to release as I have always thought I could do.
...right there on his shoulder...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1143
Death at Tocumwal
Davis Straub - 2006/01/24 12:27:32 UTC

I'm willing to put the barrel release within a few inches of my hand.
Image
Image

...within very easy reach.

There's also a hook knife...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJGUJO5BjnA


...with a long track record within very easy reach in a sheath right above his parachute container.

And hell, for that matter he's got the parachute handle within very easy reach.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uegD4QeAc58

25-0820
Image
26-0902
Image
34-1209
Image

And that sucker can stop you on a dime.

That's FOUR - count 'em, FOUR - options you've got within very easy reach. Well FIVE - if you've got Baileys on BOTH shoulders.

Really Zack...

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=28697
Weak links why do we use them. in paragliding.
Mike Bomstad - 2009/12/12 06:46:44 UTC

I know Tad causes some to think, but all the "your going to die...." gets old.
I know you cause some to think, but all the "you're all gonna die" crap really gets old. The truth of the matter is that just a very few of us are gonna die...

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8143/7462005802_bbc0ac66ac_o.jpg
Image

...and at a very acceptable and sustainable rate.

(Hey Mike. How's tricks?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMsIkAOeJ0I


http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26134
Whipstall almost tumble
Mike Bomstad - 2011/12/26 08:33:15 UTC

Well, how about a weak link...
I was really hoping you'd have some input on this discussion.)
...all my weak link breaks have been in severe lockouts...
You haven't said why you didn't release before those breaks occurred. Assuming you actually desired being off the line, I can only think of two reasons: you couldn't get to your release in time or your release didn't work. Assuming either/both of these are the case (let me know if I'm wrong)...

You already know that a lockout near the ground can kill you if you wait for even a weak weak link to break. You're rolling the dice if you think any weak link might ever save you. Don't look at your cumulative experience - look at the worst case.

Having to reach for a release does more than increase the time between deciding to release and actually releasing. You need every bit of both hands to resist a lockout. Take a hand off the bar for an instant and your attitude will immediately worsen...
Dennis Pagen - 2005/01

By the time we gained about sixty feet I could no longer hold the glider centered - I was probably at a twenty degree bank - so I quickly released before the lockout to the side progressed. The glider instantly whipped to the side in a wingover maneuver.
But you'll almost always be able to pull out in time to come out smelling like a rose and able to continue using the same Industry Standard equipment and writing the same fatality reports on the situations in which people WEREN'T able to pull out in time.
...raising the altitude below which survival is not possible.

And if you didn't survive when a better release might have saved you, the accident report will inevitably attribute the accident to pilot error and the pilot waiting too long to release (with no mention of the type of release used).

Dumbing down a weak link to compensate for an inadequate release is like lowering your vehicle's air bag trigger point to compensate for faulty brakes. Releases are absolutely critical to safe towing...and a weak link is not a release.
Especially when you take into account that low trigger airbags have killed kids in the passenger's seat when bumpers have been tapped.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/09/02 23:09:12 UTC

Yeah, damn those pesky safety devices!
Remember kids, always blame the equipment.
Really good - unplagiarized - analogy. I've often thought of trying to use the air bag for one but I never figured out how to express it really well.
Zack C
Site Admin
Posts: 292
Joined: 2010/11/23 01:31:08 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Zack C »

Tad Eareckson wrote:Really good - unplagiarized - analogy. I've often thought of trying to use the air bag for one but I never figured out how to express it really well.
Good, yes. Unplagiarized, hell no!
Tad Eareckson wrote:Dumbing down the weak link to compensate for a crap release makes even less sense than packing your air bag system with more explosive and lowering the actuation point so you can drive around with defective brakes and steering and no seat belt.
http://www.kitestrings.org/post10.html#p10

Zack
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Thanks.

(Alzheimer's kicking in again.)
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: Weak links

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26870
weak links
Zack - 2012/08/19 18:03
aglia

Please help me be clarified.
Where'd the post go? Who's aglia? You got the original?
In the statement you quoted, I am only saying that any usable weak link, no matter how weak, is capable of holding long enough for the glider to get into an unrecoverable situation before it breaks, and thus you cannot expect the weak link to save you. That's not its job. I am not saying you'd fare better in a lockout with a stronger weak link. In either case, waiting for the weak link to break could kill you.
And you can also launch into a situation in which you're gonna die no matter what you're using in the way of equipment or how well and fast you react - just like in free flying off a ramp.
Are you saying a strong weaklink delays the occurrence of a lock out?
No, until the weak link breaks, it has no effect on anything.
Or is it there to prolong the lockout to give you time to release?
Think about that question. If the weak link blows in less time than you need to release you don't need any more time to release.
No, generally the longer you're on the line in a lockout, the worse off you'll be. The pilot should be off the line as soon as he desires to be.
And his reactions allow him to be.
Bill Bryden - 2000/02

Dennis Pagen informed me several years ago about an aerotow lockout that he experienced. One moment he was correcting a bit of alignment with the tug and the next moment he was nearly upside down. He was stunned at the rapidity. I have heard similar stories from two other aerotow pilots.
I've had that shit happen up high - armed to the teeth and still finished thirty feet lower than I started out. It wouldn't be survivable shortly after takeoff.
If not, his release is inadequate. All that said, there are times when staying on the line is better.
Including in climbing lockouts.
Dennis Pagen - 2005/01

What happened to him is not too unusual or mysterious. He encountered so much lift that although he was pulling in the base bar as far as he could, he did not have enough pitch-down control to get the nose down and return to proper position behind the tug. This situation is known as an over-the-top lockout.

I am personally familiar with such a problem, because it happened to me at a meet in Texas. Soon after lift-off the trike tug and I were hit by the mother of all thermals. Since I was much lighter, I rocketed up well above the tug, while the very experienced tug pilot, Neal Harris, said he was also lifted more than he had ever been in his heavy trike. I pulled in all the way, but could see that I wasn't going to come down unless something changed. I hung on and resisted the tendency to roll to the side with as strong a roll input as I could, given that the bar was at my knees. I didn't want to release, because I was so close to the ground and I knew that the glider would be in a compromised attitude. In addition, there were hangars and trees on the left, which is the way the glider was tending. By the time we gained about sixty feet I could no longer hold the glider centered--I was probably at a 20-degree bank--so I quickly released before the lockout to the side progressed. The glider instantly whipped to the side in a wingover maneuver. I cleared the buildings, but came very close to the ground at the bottom of the wingover. I leveled out and landed.

Analyzing my incident made me realize that had I released earlier I probably would have hit the ground at high speed at a steep angle.
...
We are taught to release at the first sign of trouble...
Yeah Dennis, by the assholes you consulted to write your stupid book and by the assholes who teach and run their operations based upon what they've read in your stupid book.
...and I fully support that general policy...
Yeah, you sure do Dennis. And generally it's gotten a huge number of gliders crashed and a few gliders killed.

(And your telling people that it's perfectly OK to go up with a brake lever on a downtube or a Bailey Release on a shoulder and omitting ANY statement on an advantage to both hands on the controls at all times releases has also gotten a lot of gliders crashed and killed.)

In all but the rarest of circumstances...
Manned Kiting
The Basic Handbook of Tow Launched Hang Gliding
Daniel F. Poynter
1974

"The greatest dangers are a rope break or a premature release." - Richard Johnson
...you're gonna be in a lot deeper shit the second after you lose the line than you were a second before.
...but in some cases, the trouble happens so fast and is so powerful that a release low would have severe consequences.
So did you revise your stupid fucking book to reflect that? Or you just keep printing and circulating copies plugging 0.8 G and illegally understrength weak links and telling people:
Pro Tip: Always thank the tug pilot for intentionally releasing you, even if you feel you could have ridden it out. He should be given a vote of confidence that he made a good decision in the interest of your safety.
The decision of when to terminate a tow should be made by the pilot, not a piece of string.
How 'bout a tug pilot making a good decision in the interest of your safety?

Fuck you, Dennis.
Does one gain altitude when he/she is in a lockout (methinks no so I think it won't matter if you have a strong weak link during a lock out)?
It's possible (which is why what I wrote previously about stronger weak links increasing the required recovery altitude isn't always true).
Zack, pardon my dumb questions.
Your dumb questions beat the crap out of Paul Hurless's lunatic opinions and nonresponses.
Asking questions is what got me here.
Questions you PAID to have addressed by "flight schools" like Lockout Mountain Flight Park in the course of getting your ratings and certifications and in excellent books like Towing Aloft by Dennis Pagen and Bill Bryden.
Never stop.
Yeah, keep it up until Jack locks the topic and bans Zack.
Post Reply