landing

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=29956
most painless way to learn
gsxrpilot (Paul S) - 2013/12/05 20:54:09 UTC
Sydney

I gotta respectfully disagree with the consensus here.
Good start - 'cept, of course, for the "respectfully part.
I've landed just about everything that flies including fixed wing, helicopters, paragliders, parachutes, and of course hang gliders. While the inputs are all different, the goal is always the same. Come in with a little more speed, bleed it off in ground effect, stall/flare just at touchdown. The more different birds I fly, the more they all land the same.

Just my $0.02.
How many of them do you whipstall from bottom end flying speed to a dead stop inside of a second?

And in what other disciplines do you shift your hands from the control element to support struts where control authority is at an extremely dangerous minimum and where the slightest of timing issues...

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3859/14423696873_f1326e2320_o.png
Image

...routinely result in whacks, damage, dislocated shoulders, and broken arms?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEMEVlSTah4
Nick Maganini - 2013/12/09

This was an approach in the Pinnacle Mountain LZ near Hendersonville, North Carolina. The pilot walked away with some bruises and some scratches and some how avoided serious injury. Please keep comments positive and know that the pilot is fully aware of what happened and what went wrong.
High performance / topless glider, obviously highly experienced pilot getting a bit too cute on approach, substantial tailwind, tall grass, very probably nothing in the way of wheels or skids, stays prone with hands on the basetube all the way in, crashes in high grass at fairly high speed with bar in at over a forty degree roll, trashes starboard outboard leading edge section and probably both downtubes, walks away with some scratches and bruises.

Compare/Contrast:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1Ouu3yU1EU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYe3YmdIQTM

---
Edit - 2013/12/30 21:00:00 UTC

There was a substanial tailwind involved in the Pinnacle crash that I didn't notice before reading the traffic.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30566
HG's NEVER Crash
Paraglider Collapse - 2013/12/30 20:17:17 UTC

I am concerned about placing public videos on YouTube with titles such as "Hang Gliding Crash." This is HUGELY bad publicity for our sport when the uninitiated - or god forbid even LZ landowners - stumble across these. As far as the public is concerned, WE NEVER CRASH!
1. So is that where we're having most of our crashes?

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22176
Paragliding Collapses
Jim Rooney - 2011/06/12 13:57:58 UTC

Most common HG injury... spiral fracture of the humerus.
In LZs by people practicing to perfect their flare timing...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuMxK9PadzA


...rather than in narrow dry riverbeds with large rocks strewn all over the place by people who didn't practice perfecting their flare timing enough?

2. Yeah, let's make the videos inaccessible. Hard to go wrong creating the illusion that there isn't a problem rather than addressing the problem.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30566
HG's NEVER Crash
Dontsink - 2013/12/31 20:54:05 UTC

Seems "Paraglider Collapse" has gone into a typical cascade of stalls/frontals on this thread Image
Expect no sympathy from the growing number of pilots who fly both PG/HG, you have been hysterical about PG's for too long... and now you want to sweep the broken DT's under the rug?
Happy new year!
The broken downtubes (and arms) aren't inevitable consequences of flying hang gliders. They're almost entirely consequences of totally unnecessary foot landing attempts...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=28835
Why I don't paraglide
Tom Emery - 2013/04/17 14:29:12 UTC
San Diego

Been flying Crestline about a year now. I've seen more bent aluminum than twisted risers. Every time another hang pounds in, Steven, the resident PG master, just rolls his eyes and says something like, "And you guys think hang gliding is safer."
...in well groomed primaries.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://origin.library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1103589637008-47/bhpa_hg_high_aspect_neck_risk.pdf
British Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association Ltd
8 Merus Court Meridian Business Park Leicester LE19 1RJ
Tel (0116) 289 4316
Fax (0116) 281 4949
http://www.bhpa.co.uk

2013/12

Ref. no.:
FSC.SC10

SAFETY ADVISORY
Issued by Angus Pinkerton - Chairman of the Flying & Safety Committee 2013/12/18.

All Hang Glider Pilots must READ, DIGEST AND TAKE ACTION on the contents of this Notice and keep it for future reference.

If you hold a copy of the BHPA Technical Manual this notice must be inserted into it and retained until it is withdrawn or superseded on instructions from the Chairman FSC.

HANG GLIDER NECK INJURY IN FAILED LANDING

In a recent accident the hang glider pilot, as a result of a base-bar collision during landing, swung through the control frame. His harness allowed him to move forward to the extent that his head was in front of the high aspect-ratio glider's nose plate, which his weight and momentum pulled down violently on to the back of his head / neck region. The pilot suffered serious injury.

Analysis:

High-aspect ratio hang gliders have been around for ten years or so, and FSC trials have revealed that with most harness types, a tall pilot can get his head in front of the nose of a high aspect-ratio glider. It appears to be the case that the specific unusual feature in this accident (and two others now identified) is that the pilot was holding the base bar (rather than the uprights) during his landing approach.

It is believed that the best current method of minimising this danger is to ensure that landing approaches are flown on the uprights. If the landing fails, then:

a. If the pilot is on the uprights, his forward progress is delayed (and energy dissipated) by the bending and breaking of the uprights. Also breaking of the uprights removes the danger of the nose being pulled onto the pilot's neck. Whilst if the pilot is on the base bar, there is no impediment to his forward progress and reduced likelihood of the uprights breaking.

b. If the pilot is on the uprights, his action on the uprights, after the base bar hits, results in the nose slamming down, before his head gets there.

Whilst if the pilot is on the base bar, the key factor in the nose coming down is the hang strap pulling it down behind him, onto his head/neck/back.

c. If the pilot is on the uprights, his head is well up. To get under the nose his head would have to follow an 'S' trajectory. Whilst if the pilot is on the base bar, his head is already well forward, and to get under the nose it simply needs to carry on forwards.

Although not a factor in the accident identified above, it is also known that base bar wheels usually reduce the glider's deceleration in landing incidents, and would thus reduce the likelihood of the unrestrained pilot being thrown forward in front of the nose.

Action:

Hang Glider pilots should make landing approaches with their hands on the uprights and shoulders raised.
SAFETY ADVISORY
Issued by Angus Pinkerton - Chairman of the Flying & Safety Committee - 2013/12/18.
Fuck you, Angus Pinkerton, Chairman of the Flying and Safety Committee.

http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=28697
Weak links why do we use them. in paragliding.
Steve Uzochukwu - 2010/02/11 14:25:49 UTC

Angus Pinkerton responds
Alan is convinced that a weak link parting is dangerous. Indeed this seems to be a common misconception in various types of towing, despite the fact that in almost all cases the perceived danger of a weak-link break is undoubtedly due to high tow tensions causing dangerous aircraft attitudes. In any properly conducted paraglider tow operation the canopy is at a safe attitude (i.e. above the pilot) when it is at low level. A low-level line break is a mild inconvenience. What is dangerous is a random part of the tow system failing at high tension. The weak link ensures that high tensions can never be reached...
Fuck you too, Steve.
All Hang Glider Pilots must READ, DIGEST...
How 'bout you just shove it up your ass so, when it comes back out, we can just pretend it's been digested?
...AND TAKE ACTION on the contents of this Notice and keep it for future reference.
Don't worry 'bout either of those items - motherfucker.
If you hold a copy of the BHPA Technical Manual this notice must be inserted into it and retained until it is withdrawn or superseded on instructions from the Chairman FSC.
Insert THIS:

Image
HANG GLIDER NECK INJURY IN FAILED LANDING
A "FAILED LANDING" is a CRASH. And damn near all crashes are some variety of failed landings.
In a recent accident the hang glider pilot, as a result of a base-bar collision during landing, swung through the control frame.
Big surprise.
His harness allowed him to move forward to the extent that his head was in front of the high aspect-ratio glider's nose plate, which his weight and momentum pulled down violently on to the back of his head / neck region. The pilot suffered serious injury.
Permanent paralysis. Another big surprise.
Analysis:

High-aspect ratio hang gliders have been around for ten years or so, and FSC trials have revealed that with most harness types, a tall pilot can get his head in front of the nose of a high aspect-ratio glider. It appears to be the case that the specific unusual feature in this accident (and two others now identified) is that the pilot was holding the base bar (rather than the uprights) during his landing approach.
Reminds me a lot of THIS:
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

Three recent aerotowing accidents have occurred--one fatal. The common thread in all three was a lockout and the use of a much too heavy weak link. Tandem gliders are much less responsive than smaller gliders and the pilot in command often has a less than ideal position on the control bar. The situation shouldn't be compromised by an over-strength weak link.
bullshit.
It is believed that the best current method of minimising this danger is to ensure that landing approaches are flown on the uprights.
OH! It is "BELIEVED"!
- By whom?
- What was the number of elite douchebags you polled?
- What were their qualifications?
- What are some of their other BELIEFS?
- Is there any actual data or anecdotal evidence - beyond that pathetic crap you just referenced - to support this belief?
If the landing fails, then:
...all bets are off. The pilot can walk away smelling like a rose, be scraped off the runway into a body bag, or experience anything in between. And we need to be assuming that things won't turn out well in crashes and focusing on the best ways to land rather than the BELIEFS of unidentified assholes on the best ways to crash.
a. If the pilot is on the uprights...
...his control authority goes to hell and his risks of crashing, breaking an arm, dislocating a shoulder go through the ceiling.
...his forward progress is delayed (and energy dissipated) by the bending and breaking of the uprights.
Dude!

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3859/14423696873_f1326e2320_o.png
Image

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1Ouu3yU1EU


Great plan!
Also breaking of the uprights removes the danger of the nose being pulled onto the pilot's neck.
Cool! I'll make a point of trying to break the uprights on ALL of my landings - just to be on the safe side.
Whilst if the pilot is on the base bar, there is no impediment to his forward progress and reduced likelihood of the uprights breaking.
Got it, Angus. You had me the first time you recommended breaking uprights by keeping my hands on them the first time you mentioned it.
b. If the pilot is on the uprights, his action on the uprights, after the base bar hits, results in the nose slamming down, before his head gets there.
OK, slam the nose down as quickly as possible after basetube contact. I'll work on that technique just as soon as the temperature gets back up to something sane.
Whilst if the pilot is on the base bar, the key factor in the nose coming down is the hang strap pulling it down behind him, onto his head/neck/back.
What if we put some kinds of devices on the ends of the base bar that allowed it to continue moving forward with little resistance after contact?

Image
c. If the pilot is on the uprights, his head is well up.
No shit! Really hard to imagine that being anything other than a mitigating factor...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-36aQ3Hg33c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkElZMhpmp0


...when the glider comes to an abrupt stop.
To get under the nose his head would have to follow an 'S' trajectory.
Or you could just fly into the side of a barn and totally eliminate any possibility of getting chopped by the nose.
Whilst if the pilot is on the base bar, his head is already well forward, and to get under the nose it simply needs to carry on forwards.
It's also carrying a lot less potential energy 'cause it's a lot lower relative to the ground and the pilot is a lot more likely to be in a lot better control of his glider.
Although not a factor in the accident identified above...
This "accident" occurred as a consequence of a lot of things being done and lining up wrong. It was a low impact event with some really horrible consequences. And all you're doing is writing a load of totally moronic crap about same BELIEFS on mitigating such a situation. And the focus needs to be entirely on not getting into a landing situation in which one is making compromises to avoid hitting families with babies.
...it is also known that base bar wheels usually reduce the glider's deceleration in landing incidents...
Wow! You guys are GOOD.
...and would thus reduce the likelihood of the unrestrained pilot being thrown forward in front of the nose.
And it's also a no fuckin' brainer that the most consistent, best controlled, safest, easiest, most FUN landing is effected by...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2Gd2kcyOes

http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7094/13952342741_f71f343877_o.png
Image
Image
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7151/13952329131_03e535bc8b_o.png

...staying prone on the fuckin' basetube with your head forward and low and deliberately rolling in on the wheels - which is pretty much the polar opposite of all the bullshit in your bullshit advisory.
Action:

Hang Glider pilots should make landing approaches with their hands on the uprights and shoulders raised.
And keep those cameras running!
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30603
Safety notice about blade wing basebar approaches
CAL - 2014/01/06 23:49:57 UTC
Ogden

I feel that coming in on the base is definitely an advanced skill...
That, strangely, my Day One, Flight One students on the dunes used to be able to pull off about as effectively as I ever could.
...as for me I will get upright, there are a few times I needed the extra glide and stayed prone on the base and during the flare kicked out of the harness and got on the dts, and flared but I don't like it all.
How many times have you actually NEEDED to kick out of the harness and get on the downtubes and flare?
I have seen a few that stay on the base, all of which pull them off very well and land better than your average pilot, thank goodness because you are in a vulnerable position.
That's how Steve Pearson lands - IF/WHEN everything's still under control well enough for him to wanna stop it on his feet. And he's not doing it to look cool. He's doing it 'cause it's SAFER.
...those that do will never change, the two that I know, one states that you have more control...
Until you start seeing top competition pilots going upright to the downtubes to thermal more efficiently you can safely assume that you DO, in fact, have more control.
...the other says you have as much control...
The other is a lying asshole.
...and is safer to go upright but simply stays on the base because he wants to look cool, is exact reply.

Both pilots are aerobatic pilots and are very precise in their inputs, ok I will tell you there names Dangerous Dave Gibson and Ryan Voight, they told me, so I am sure they won't mind me telling you.
What did I just say about the other one?
Dave Hopkins - 2014/01/07 20:29:58 UTC

Also all modern glider from Falcons to topless can get plenty of speed with our hands on the uprights.
Yeah, they can, Dave. The problem is that "plenty" isn't always enough.
Coming through the gradient head up, pulled in, eyes on the spot gives us the best chance to have a smooth approach with no yawing or pop ups.
Bullshit. Coming through the gradient prone, pulled in, allowing the glider to determine its own fucking spot gives us the best chance to have a smooth approach with no yawing or pop ups.
This is my opinion.
Big surprise.
I developed it from yrs of flying XC and needing a technique that would keep me safe to fly the next day and yr.
I develop all my procedures and equipment to handle worst case scenarios as optimally as possible.
There is NO one to look cool for in far away lzs...
Safe and cool looking aren't necessarily mutually exclusive modes.
...and no one to call 911.
It really makes me sad to see pilots busted up instead of the glider.
Here's Zack Marzec's glider after the fatal tailslide, whipstall, tumble, and crash:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bRrpHNa68iY/UQ6Pv9gRZyI/AAAAAAAAjTg/Hc22bx5122Q/s2048/20943781_BG1.jpg
Image

It's in really great shape. What do you figure he could've been doing better as the runway was rushing up?
If 30 of us fly 20 times a yr and only one of us gets severely injured from using a bad technique it is still a bad technique.
Those numbers are pathetic. You need to pull pro toads with Rooney Links about a hundred thousand times before you get things to line up right enough to kill one of them.

2:15
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tj1Z_BI5OXs
It's pushing it TOO hard. Because, I do this more than a thousand times a year. You're really pushing the envelope at a thousand to one chance of getting hurt. It should be more like one in a HUNDRED thousand - which is probably the same as driving your car.
And I think one in a hundred thousand is insanely dangerous. How would you feel about going to a packed University of Michigan football stadium if you knew that sometime during the game a sniper was gonna take out at random someone in the stands?
Carole Sherrington - 2014/01/08 00:32:45 UTC
Essex

The BHPA's Flight Safety Committee (FSC) uses a reporting format similar to that long established by the Air Accident Investigation Branch of the Civil Aviation Authority.
Yeah, kinda like Joe Gregor did - big on format, shit on substance.
Any accident to a HG pilot involving serious injury will come to the notice of the FSC...
But if the dude pulls out a few feet off the deck...

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9Ek9_lFeSII/UZ4KuB0MUSI/AAAAAAAAGyU/eWfhGo4QeqY/s1024/GOPR5278.JPG
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3725/9665623251_612b921d70_o.png
Image
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Xh_NfnOcUns/UZ4Lm0HvXnI/AAAAAAAAGyk/0PlgrHfc__M/s1024/GOPR5279.JPG

...no problem. We don't discuss it until somebody does the same lockout ten or fifteen feet lower.
...so if they say it's a new phenomenon, what they mean is they haven't been notified of any such accidents, so they probably didn't happen (in the UK).
Fuck the UK. If something happens on Guam that illustrates an issue it should get the same level of attention that it would if it had happened at Long Mynd.
Having come to the conclusion that pilot position in the control frame was partly responsible for his injuries they have a duty to report that conclusion.
How legitimate was "their" conclusion?

What was it based on?

Who's allowed into the "they" club?

Did those motherfuckers have no duty to report any conclusions about the Zack Marzec fatality because Florida isn't in the UK and his fishing line allowed 35 pounds more towline tension than would've been allowed under BHPA fishing line regulations?
I see no end of landings where the pilot makes an extravagantly fast approach on the base bar, rounds out into ground effect then floats on, still on the base bar for a hundred yards or more, two feet over a crop or ploughed field.
How many of them have you seen that have been the cause of a slightly bowed downtube or worse?
IMHO...
Fuck your opinion.
...the place to transition to the uprights is at 100 feet or so, where any miss of the upright or unintended pitch change won't have catastrophic consequences.
And there's no chance whatsoever of catastrophic consequences arising from the inability to get any real speed, the resulting shit control authority, or...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27217
Bad Launch!
Ryan Voight - 2012/09/25 05:59:51 UTC

You see... the human shoulder limits how far you can pull in. Prone or upright, you can really only get your hands back about even with your shoulders.
...what WILL happen to an arm or shoulder when the glider stops abruptly and the pilot doesn't.
In this particular case, I can see how this accident developed.
Good. Then you can see how not to get into a situation in which a fairly minor bonk situation can leave you a quadriplegic.
The Long Mynd has a reputation of claiming aluminium if a pilot gets too far back. The heathland takes no prisoners. On my single visit to the site, I was impressed by how many of the locals bent tubes.
Guess there weren't many people going upright at a hundred feet.
So the pilot is flying a hot ship, in lowering wind, with a small bottom landing field, a small top landing area, cars in the undershoot, without the desire to go back from the edge of the field.

He's going to turn finals very low. Too low in this case.
This didn't have shit to do with a low approach turn. This had damn near everything to do with a small cluster of people occupying the approximate touchdown point. I'll leave it to you Long Mynders to figure out some procedures for preventing reruns. Me... I think I could've set up my approach with enough Plans B, C, D that I would't have needed to be dodging people in the last couple of seconds.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30603
Safety notice about blade wing basebar approaches
NMERider - 2014/01/08 01:20:11 UTC

The issue of body and hand positioning will never be settled on some 'one-size-fits-all' technique. Not in my book at any rate.
But in your book...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
NMERider - 2013/02/19 22:56:19 UTC

I will appreciate that it is the tug pilot's call as to the maximum breaking strength of any so-called weak link system and not mine.
...if a bunch of douchebag ultralight drivers...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3600
Weak link question
Jim Rooney - 2008/11/24 05:18:15 UTC

I've personally refused to tow a flight park owner over this very issue. I didn't want to clash, but I wasn't towing him. Yup, he wanted to tow with a doubled up weaklink. He eventually towed (behind me) with a single and sorry to disappoint any drama mongers, we're still friends. And lone gun crazy Rooney? Ten other tow pilots turned him down that day for the same reason.
...determine that the only thing they'll allow you up on is the same one-size-fits-all lockout protector...

http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5529/14422573378_5385a9a99a_o.png
Image

...that just killed one of their tandem aerotow instructor buddies that's totally cool - and fuck grade school arithmetic, common sense, and FAA aerotowing regulations.
I say, "To each, his own"...
You say "Whatever Davis and Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney mandate."
...and "The right tool for the job".
Just as long as the pin's properly bent.
Have as many different arrows in your quiver or lures in your tackle box as the hunt may require. Image
And make sure your bows are all strung and lures are all tied on with 130 pound test fishing line because it's got a long track record and Rooney says it's time tested and proven and works a hell of a lot better than all the other bullshit he's seen out there.

Fuck you, Jonathan.
Steve Seibel - 2014/01/08 01:22:44 UTC

Guys and girls, let's collect some data.

Next time you are set up on a non-windy day--

Hook in and get some helpers to see if they can position the apex of the wing on your neck.

I'm guessing it is possible with in any harness even in a Sport 2 and certainly in anything an even slightly wider nose angle / narrower root chord than a Sport 2.

Get your helpers to take pictures to show why this is or is not possible in your glider/ harness combination.
And what are we gonna do with this data, Steve? Advise people whose necks are in range of the nose to crash less frequently and more carefully?
Comet - 2014/01/08 05:42:50 UTC

Was it not Davis Straub who hit his head so hard on the glider undersurface during a botched aerotow dolly takeoff that his head went through the sail?
Instead of into the keel where it belonged? Yes.
I nosed-in hard once (yeah, just once) and dented the keel with my helmet. Could have broken my neck, even without having the glider nose hit me in the back of the head.
Goddam right.

When you crash there's all kinds of ways you can get fucked up or killed. Nobody's talking about reengineering hang gliders for safer crash configurations and if we tried some stupid shit like that we'd probably increase crash and injury rates and severity due to inevitable weight, performance, handling compromises. Bowsprit gliders, suprone harnesses maybe - but neither of those are gonna happen to any greater extent than they are now.

There's no fixed wing aircraft that can handle dad, mom, and the kid at the landing touchdown point without a strong probability of something really ugly happening to one or more of the involved parties. Duh. And I can't think of any recommendations that aren't so blindingly obvious that mentioning them wouldn't be blindly stupid.
Clockboy - 2014/01/08 18:35:25 UTC
So Cal

Of course it would be horrible to fly the basetube into the ground while you're still fully proned out. I believe that's how Chris Muller fatally crashed, and he was a world class pilot at the top of his game.
Chris Muller fatally crashed flying at about 1.5 VNE trying to snatch a goodie bag off the top of a traffic cone. This activity was promoted by a culture that's so rabidly concerned about pilot safety that it won't permit anyone to tow up on anything heavier than 130 pound test fishing line.
Hot dogging is cool and I certainly admire those who do it well, but they know the risks.
Chris obviously didn't - until about a tenth of a second beyond the point at which his understanding could've done him some good.
For a safe conservative approach in light winds on a topless, I do prefer to be on the basetube with both hands, just like a dangerous hot dog approach.
Which is the polar opposite of the recommendation of the Pinkerton Douchebags.
The differences are in speed and body position. For a safe approach, fly a little fast for good control, but not that damn fast. I'd say a little above best glide.
OK. Now stop talking.
Even though I keep both hands on the basetube, I get upright early, well before turning onto final. That's especially important for backplate pods, but really for any harness type.
Why do you need to be upright?
The upright body position is relaxed, with feet trailing behind, maybe even dragging on the ground behind you as you skim along in ground effect. I've seen people sometimes try to get too upright, like they want their hips forward or something. That actually makes it harder to get your CG back when it's time to flare.
Why do you need to flare?
Just rock upright and relax, let your legs trail behind you.
I notice you didn't need to tell anyone to relax at any point in the fully prone phase.
Once on the deck, gradually let the bar out as you slow down. Then as soon as you reach trim speed, move both hands, one at a time as high up on the downtubes as you comfortably can without pulling or contorting, or doing anything that will upset the balance of the glider.
And, of course, there will be NO POSSIBILITY of Mother Nature doing anything that will upset the balance of the glider at this point because she recognizes your state of vulnerability and is deeply concerned about your wellbeing.
Then flare pretty quick after that.
And here's what Steve Pearson - also of So Cal - says on this issue:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27086
Steve Pearson on landings
Steve Pearson - 2012/03/28 23:26:05 UTC

I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.
Steve doesn't assume that Mother Nature won't be doing anything that will upset the balance of the glider and doesn't lock in to the goal of stopping on his feet.
Jim Rooney says flare one second after trim. My T2 timing seems to be about three seconds after trim.
Fuck you, your T2, and your three seconds. Jim Rooney says ONE second and he's a PROFESSIONAL PILOT who just *might* have an idea of how this stuff works. If he says punch it at one second you punch it at one second. If he says use the same fishing line on your 357 pound T2 154 that some little girl is using on her 165 pound Falcon 3 145 you fuckin' do it.
Gliders and states of tune vary, but this will give you an objective frame of reference and get you in the ballpark. So many people seem to be unaware of what hemisphere the ballpark is located in (you know who you are LOL).
What if you just flew it until it wouldn't anymore and let it roll in on the wheels?
My point is that being in an upright body position adds a lot of safety.
BULLSHIT. It does the precise opposite. How many tandems do you see landing upright and how many tandem landing crashes do hear about?
And being on the basetube, all the way until trim speed is reached, allows for a lot better control of the glider throughout the approach, and it allows you to be more sensitive to trim speed, which is the critical thing to timing your flare.
Oh! So being on the basetube all the way until trim speed is reached allows for a lot better control of the glider. And then after trim speed is reached and response starts getting mushy good control of the glider becomes much less of an issue so being up on the downtubes is highly unlikely to present any problems.
And lastly, be ready to run. Running should be in the front of your mind as you flare, not just an afterthought that you might pull out if you need it.
Any danger of tripping on one of those large rocks strewn all over the place in that narrow dry riverbed you're using as an LZ?
If you flare early or perfectly, you won't run. If you're a hair late, a couple steps makes all the difference.
The difference between what and what? A pretty much perfect foot landing and a light bonk with broken arm? Do we really wanna be trusting in our ability to execute the critical timing and the couple of steps when the stakes are that high for years worth of landings?
I'm not an instructor...
So what? Have you been reading the idiot crap that instructors are telling their students and posting? Did you read the advisory that came out of BHPA in response to this incident which is the opposite of what you're saying and most experienced and successful flyers are doing?
...so take all this with a grain of whatever.
Fuck taking stuff with grains. It either checks out on the numbers or it doesn't.
I recommend to anybody struggling with these issues to read Jim Rooney's stuff about landing if you haven't already.
Fuck Rooney and his stuff.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=25536
Whoops! Snapped another tip wand :-O
NMERider - 2012/03/14 15:17:14 UTC

Jim Rooney threw a big tantrum and stopped posting here.

His one-technique-fits-all attitude espoused on the Oz Report Forum has become tiresome to read. It does not work in the fucked-up world of XC landings and weary pilots.
Christopher LeFay - 2012/03/15 05:57:43 UTC

January's canonization of Rooney as the Patron Saint of Landing was maddening. He offered just what people wanted to hear: there is an ultimate, definitive answer to your landing problems, presented with absolute authority. Judgment problems? His answer is to remove judgment from the process - doggedly stripping out critical differences in gliders, loading, pilot, and conditions. This was just what people wanted - to be told a simple answer. In thanks, they deified him, carving his every utterance in Wiki-stone.
He hasn't written a single word on landings than somebody else hadn't written at least thirty years ago.

Rooney doesn't do anything in the way of REAL hang glider flying. He's a malignant little coward who's only interested in self promotion and power.

REAL hang glider pilots tend not to fly tugs 'cause tugs are most needed when soaring conditions are totally awesome.

Anybody who flies a tug more than two or three weekends is the best tug pilot on the planet 'cause there's not much to it and after two or three weekends you've gotten as good as anybody can get. The challenge - and the danger - is ALL on the back end of the string.

Rooney does scooter tow instruction and tandem aerotow rides. He doesn't do foot launch tandem 'cause he knows he's too stupid to be able to figure out how make sure he's connected to his glider before he runs off the ramp and I think it's a pretty safe bet that nobody would hire him for foot launch tandem rides anyway.

He doesn't do XC - or any other kind of - competition because he'd get demolished. He'd finish in the bottom quarter - way behind a lot of the weekend warrior muppets he's always pissing all over - and the fake aura he's created for himself would be irreparably/irreversibly breeched.

Rooney's landings are all party tricks...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjHqdmUAAFo
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjHqdmUAAFo[/video]

...performed after scooter tow launches on putting greens in training conditions on lightly loaded gliders with a nearby windsock and lots of streamers around.

Look at his YouTube channel:

http://www.youtube.com/user/j1mrooney/videos

to see what kind of flying he does.

01. Julia
- 1:56 - paraglider - tandem
02. QuadCam
- 1:19 - camera test in front yard
03. Trimmer Trick
- 0:27 - paraglider - tandem
04. An other landing example
- 0:28 - paraglider - tandem
05. Landing at FlightPark
- 0:29 - paraglider - tandem
06. Rescuing a 4x4
- 0:40 - car getting pulled out of river by truck
07. Soraya at Hensons Gap
- 0:11 - hang glider - ramp launch - somebody else
08. Hang gliding in Virginia
- 3:12 - hang glider - aerotow - tandem - sled - wheel landing
09. Towing Hang Gliders
- 1:55 - Dragonfly tow (as driver)
10. Hang Gliding in Virginia at Accomack County Airport
- 0:32 - hang glider - tandem - wheel landing gear
11. Virginia hang gliding at Accomack County Airport
- 0:33 - hang glider - tandem - wheel landing gear
12. Flying to work
- 2:35 - paraglider - solo - sled
13. Mathias Piano Man
- 0:33 - street musician
14. Landing with Sunnie at FlightPark
- 0:21 - paraglider - tandem - landing
15. Quickouts
- 0:21 - paraglider - tandem - landing - cutaway mechanisms
16. movie
- 2:19 - paraglider - tandem - tourist ride
17. aero
- 0:45 - paraglider - tandem - tourist ride
18. Afraid Of Heights
- 2:30 - paraglider - tandem - tourist ride
19. Soaring the peak
- 0:33 - paraglider - tandem - tourist ride

03 - 15.8% - non flying related
01 - 05.3% - Dragonfly
11 - 57.9% - para glider - all tandem
04 - 21.0% - hang glider - three tandem with full takeoff/landing gear, one somebody else
00 - 00.0% - hang glider - solo - Rooney

He's not gonna foot land REAL hang gliders after REAL flights in REAL conditions 'cause he'll inevitably bonk and someone will inevitably get it on video. And then... Image.
With all that said, I'm sure I'll pound in next time. Image
Pre fucking cisely. You bloody well know that what you've just described is complex, demanding of a great deal of skill and judgment, dependent upon smooth air, and dangerous. You know that it's pretty much inevitable that you're gonna blow it now and then in the long run and that when you're most likely to blow it is gonna be when you can least afford to. And you know - just from listening to your fellow flyers - that your chances of getting seriously injured at some point as a result of this totally unnecessary stunt are pretty high.

And you're also taking a lot of the fun out of ALL of your flights by subjecting yourself to a lot of unnecessary stress and anxiety at their conclusions.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=35893
Fingers
Pat O'Mara - 2014/01/23 12:17:53 UTC

A short video of landing an Atos VR at Quest Air on wheels made by AIR. The pneumatic wheels keeper fell off, then the wheel came off the rim. The air stem with a stainless steel cap hit my finger and broke a third of the bone away. It's not too graphic but it was very bad. I spent two days in the hospital so far.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uaUhkxTAPo


I feel we should warn owners of these wheels of the danger.
Image
Gloves should be worn and hands kept away from the danger area.

Image
The pneumatic wheels keeper fell off, then the wheel came off the rim.
Steve Davy - 2012/10/18 06:29:45 UTC

Hang gliding isn't ready for the revolutionary concept of the wheel.
The air stem with a stainless steel cap hit my finger and broke a third of the bone away.
How bout using a plastic cap and installing the wheels with the valve stems outboard?
I feel we should warn owners of these wheels of the danger.
I feel A.I.R should be taking the lead on this one.
Angelo Mantas - 2014/01/23 21:07:44 UTC

I was there when this happened. It should be pointed out that this was a perfectly normal landing, it looks rougher than it was because of the bouncy video. He did not bang it in, no extra stress at all. Quite the opposite, I remember thinking what a smooth landing it was. And it still broke apart. Whoever makes these wheels needs to do some re-engineering.
I don't know how these are put together but it doesn't sound like there was a lot of engineering done in the first place.

Back in '82 when I was at Kitty Hawk I flew an eleven/twelve year old kid on a trainer with a Bennett training wheel (big orange plastic job) with a broken hub. First flight and he got a finger cut. Not an emergency clinic deal but I felt about two inches tall after that one.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30679
A good reason to wear gloves!
Dave Hopkins - 2014/01/23 19:57:56 UTC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uaUhkxTAPo


I have always worn gloves . Image Small incidents can do big damage to our hands.
1. Reminds me a lot of the "thinking" that a good reason to fly a Davis Link is so's it's acceptably safe to use...

Image
Image

...a defective launch dolly.

There are LOTS of really good reasons to wear gloves. This really isn't one of them 'cause Pat would've probably gotten a broken finger out of the deal anyway. And it's also possible that a glove could catalyze an injury like this - a glove could get snagged by the valve stem and pull the finger in whereas otherwise...

2. This was NOT a small incident.
smokenjoe50 - 2014/01/23 20:21:59 UTC

Unless you have a medical reason you are a shity pilot if you can't land on your feet. Wheels are for Falcons!
And fags. Shity pilot here... Fuck you.
2014/01/23 20:23:29 UTC - Sink This! -- NMERider
2014/01/23 21:11:52 UTC - Sink This! -- Mike Bomstad
2014/01/23 20:27:34 UTC - Sink This! -- Paul Hurless
NMERider - 2014/01/23 20:22:01 UTC
Rodger Hoyt

A better reason just to learn to land without reliance on wheels.
-1
That's discriminatory against pilots with physical limitations.
And pilots who'd just as soon not suddenly develop any.
NMERider - Posts: 8221

Posted: 2014/01/23 20:35:34 UTC

Wheels are for any pilot who chooses to fly and to land with them if they desire. I live in a free country where I can do as I chose without the oppressive stench of the self-appointed superior fouling the air that I breathe and fly through.
The United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association, Inc. - 2013/02/07
12. Standard Operating Procedure
02. Pilot Proficiency System
08. Intermediate Hang Gliding Rating (H-3)
-B. Intermediate Rating - Required Witnessed Tasks
02. Demonstrated Skills and Knowledge

-g. For witnessed tasks, all landings must be safe, smooth, on the feet, and in
control.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/skysailingtowing/message/4592
Weaklinks
Tracy Tillman - 2005/02/08 19:16:10 UTC

Unfortunately, many hang glider pilots do not appreciate or understand the significant risks repeatedly taken by tug pilots and aerotow club or flight park operators, on behalf of hang glider pilots so that the hang glider pilots can have safe tows and have fun. Most tow pilots experience many more tows under a much wider variety of conditions, pilots, and equipment, and than even the some of the most experienced and advanced hang glider pilots.

If an advanced pilot wishes to use a stronger weak link, the degree of extra strength must be limited. Primarily, the use of a weak link is to save the tug pilot's behind, by preventing structural and/or control failure--and it should also help to prevent structural and/or control failure of the vehicle being towed.

A tug pilot and/or aerotow operator has every right to inspect the use and quality of the weaklink used by a hang glider pilot, and has a duty to him/her self and the hang glider pilot to make sure that it is not too strong for its primary purpose. Concurrently, the hang glider pilot has a duty to understand and respect the well-founded concerns of the tow pilot and/or aerotow operator.
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
weak links
Jim Rooney - 2007/07/22 22:30:28 UTC

I've heard it a million times before from comp pilots insisting on towing with even doubled up weaklinks (some want no weaklink). I tell them the same thing I'm telling you... suck it up. You're not the only one on the line. I didn't ask to be a test pilot. I can live with your inconvenience.
http://ozreport.com/12.081
Weaklinks - the HGFA rules
Davis Straub - 2008/04/22 14:47:00 UTC
Pilots must use weaklinks provided by the meet organizers and in a manner approved by the meet organizers. All weaklinks will be checked and use of inappropriate weaklinks will require the pilot to go to the end of the launch line to change the weaklink.

Weaklinks will consist of a single loop of Cortland 130 lb Greenspot braided Dacron Tolling line and should be placed at one end of a shoulder bridle.
http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3600
Weak link question
Jim Rooney - 2008/11/24 05:18:15 UTC

I've personally refused to tow a flight park owner over this very issue. I didn't want to clash, but I wasn't towing him. Yup, he wanted to tow with a doubled up weaklink. He eventually towed (behind me) with a single and sorry to disappoint any drama mongers, we're still friends. And lone gun crazy Rooney? Ten other tow pilots turned him down that day for the same reason.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22308
Better mouse trap(release)?
Jim Rooney - 2010/12/16 18:47:05 UTC

A few years ago, I started refusing to tow people with home made gear.
I like the idea of improving gear, but the lack of appreciation for the world they were stepping into didn't sit with me.
What country did you say you were from?
US. Ask him which assholes signed him off on his ratings.
Under a bridge in some Brothers Grimm fairy tale?
2014/01/23 21:53:26 UTC - 3 thumbs up - Perry
zamuro - 2014/01/23 21:09:25 UTC
New York

good landing skills + wheels + gloves = safer (smarter ?) pilot
Mike Bomstad - 2014/01/23 21:15:22 UTC

Sad you that mentality
Sad that when you weigh in on the right side of an issue you can't be bothered to form a coherent sentence.
Robert Moore - 2014/01/23 21:51:52 UTC

I don't know if I could ever bring myself to purposefully land on wheels in a prone position on a HG.
And all this talk I hear about the advantage to having lotsa arrows in one's quiver. No fuckin' way...
Christian Thoreson - 2004/10

Thus wheel landings, the safest and easiest way to consistently land a hang glider...
...this one, though.
It seems like the danger factor increases more than I would want.
Oh. It SEEMS like the danger factor increases more than I would want. Even though you've never even once in your flying career...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27415
Friday the 19th with Hawks & Friends!
NMERider - 2012/10/24 21:47:05 UTC

I have to say that landing on the wheels is so much fun it's not funny.
...even TRIED it.
Used as backup for a blown foot-landing - OK, but not on purpose. I want to use the landing gear I was born with.
When you're flying with the aluminum and Dacron wings you were born with. BULLSHIT.
Perry - 2014/01/23 22:02:50 UTC
Sioux Falls

I guess when my landing gear gives out I should be too ashamed to fly because I won't be able to land on my legs? Nah... who gives a shit... I wanna fly even if it means landing on wheels.
EVEN if it means landing on wheels?
Just another skill set.
It's a NON skill set. It's how Day One, Flight One students typically, instinctively, successfully land before hang gliding culture turns them into mindless whack zombies.
Nice flight and many more!!!
NMERider - 2014/01/23 22:33:38 UTC

I don't know where Dave learned about this video...
I know a real obvious place to start looking, Jonathan.
...but it looks like the pilot's right hand slipped when he bounced and his pinky finger got a large flap of skin either sliced or ripped off when it hit the side of the spinning wheel or something.
The valve stem.
I know a few pilots who fly bare-handed. I can't do it. I've flown with bare hands a few time and dislike it for a lot of reasons including the risk of a bad cut, abrasion or burn from an otherwise minor accident. I've gone down while cycling too many times and always wear full-finger gloves whether cycling or hang gliding.
Common fucking sense. But that - along with useable releases, wheels, eye protection - is something you'll never find Rooney and his fellow tug driver goons getting rabid about. As long as you have the proper loop of fishing line on your piece of shit bridle.
NMERider - 2014/01/23 22:49:32 UTC

Hey folks. When picking up stories from the Oz Report Forum please say so and post a link. I'm not saying that this is where Dave got his story since I don't know.
It's a pretty safe bet that that's where Dave got his story.
Here's the full story. Please read it and pass it around.
For those of you whom Davis permits to read what he and others post or have posted.
It's not a minor accident:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=35893
Fingers
It's neither minor nor an accident.
Dan Lukaszewicz - 2014/01/23 22:55:19 UTC
Alexandria, Virginia

Until now I've really only worn work gloves so I wouldn't be cold or because ground handling was too difficult with sweaty hands/arms during summer. That amounts to about eighty percent of the time. It never dawned on me that I needed them for protection as well.
And it never dawned on your top notch instructor at Manquin to clue you in on this.
Thanks for posting. You may have just saved me some skin. Image
Screw gloves. Just wear one of those little red rubber FOCUSED PILOT wristbands from USHGA. You'll be fine. Image
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: landing

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30679
A good reason to wear gloves!
smokenjoe50 - 2014/01/24 01:11:26 UTC

What part of my statement did I say someone couldn't use wheels.
You didn't. You just strongly implied that people who couldn't or elected not to try to pull off...
Gil Dodgen - 1995/01

All of this reminds me of a comment Mike Meier made when he was learning to fly sailplanes. He mentioned how easy it was to land a sailplane (with spoilers for glide-path control and wheels), and then said, "If other aircraft were as difficult to land as hang gliders no one would fly them."
...dangerous stunt landings a hundred percent of the time sucked as pilots (and human beings).
Maybe I wasn't clear.
Nah. You came through just fine. That's why I said:
Fuck you.
I'm saying a perfectly healthy pilot should be able to land on their feet.
1. And a reasonably intelligent third grader should be able to construct a sentence in which the pronouns are consistent with each other.

2. Yeah. They SHOULD BE. But in the REAL WORLD...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27086
Steve Pearson on landings
Steve Pearson - 2012/03/28 23:26:05 UTC

I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.
...they're NOT.
Launching and landing should be number one priority when learning to fly.
God fuckin' damn right. And they should start out - and often stay - with the easiest/safest options: wheels on both ends of the operation.
NMERider - 2014/01/24 01:41:31 UTC

Not clear? No, you made it perfectly clear when you stated:
you are a shity pilot if you can't land on your feet.
Maybe you can join the editorial staff at:

Freeflightadviceforafee.bs

You come off a lot like the editor-in-chief Image
smokenjoe50 - 2014/01/24 01:48:20 UTC

I guess you are taking this personally due to the fact that over half your flights have ended on wheels or your face!
I don't know who the fuck you are and I'm no huge fan of Jonathan's but he's probably one of the most accomplished pilots on the planet with respect to XC foot landings in hostile environments.
Dont twist my words you left out the part where I said unless you have a medical reason.
Fuck you, dude. You say:
smokenjoe50 - 2014/01/23 20:21:59 UTC

Unless you have a medical reason you are a shity pilot if you can't land on your feet.
but I don't know how much more fuckin' obvious it could possibly be that...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22176
Paragliding Collapses
Jim Rooney - 2011/06/12 13:57:58 UTC

Most common HG injury... spiral fracture of the humerus.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27217
Bad Launch!
NMERider - 2012/09/25 07:01:39 UTC
Why would CSS want that when his last landing clinic resulted in a broken arm to one of his students? Image
...people CAN'T. Go over to:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=2
Hang Gliding

and take a look at the top sticky. 187 posts, currently 31049 hits. If this could be done easily/safely we wouldn't need assholes like Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney, who'd have been long since permanently crippled if he did five percent of the kind of flying that Jonathan does, writing an encyclopedia on how to pull it off - an encyclopedia which has changed NOTHING by the way.
NMERider - 2014/01/24 01:56:04 UTC

You do a remarkable job of insulting nearly everyone who reads your posts both here and elsewhere. Are you even aware of this? You defecate on the hang gliding community that I pride myself of being a member of with virtually everything you post. What is there not to take offense to? Image
I do the same thing (and fuck your pride in being a member of a really vile "community") - but only when and where it's richly DESERVED.
smokenjoe50 - 2014/01/24 02:08:33 UTC

I'm just being truthful I tell it how it is.
Learn to write on a competent grade school level before you start thinking about telling everybody how things are.
2014/01/24 05:02:06 UTC - Sink This! -- Paul Hurless
NMERider - 2014/01/24 02:15:39 UTC

Your posts consist of little more than your personal opinions. They are pretty much devoid of any constructive purpose nor do they serve the community. Truthfully? That is how it is. Image
That's pretty consistent with the hang gliding "community" of which you're so proud to be a member.
Rob Wenban - 2014/01/24 04:14:52 UTC
Melbourne

Well said Jonathon. I have no idea who this character is but he is clearly someone who's opinions we can live without. A fool who is too stupid to realize that he has announced his ignorance.
Hey Rob. FUCK YOU.

- How many people authorized you to speak on their behalf?

- There are TONS of OPINIONS expressed on the Jack and Davis Shows people can live without. In fact since:
-- hang gliding is aviation
-- aviation is physics
-- physics doesn't give a flying fuck about any opinions

ALL opinions can be lived without just fine. But assholes like this should be allowed to present and defend them and that works to the net good.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=592
Linknife
Davis Straub - 2010/04/03 12:46:26 UTC

Tad is gone.
Rob Wenban - 2011/07/19 23:23:59 UTC

Thanks Davis, he has nothing constructive to add, he simply causes trouble - well done!
Well said, Jonathan. Well done, Davis. Suck my dick.
Dave Hopkins - 2014/01/24 05:25:20 UTC

video was on the OZ report. The cause of the ripped chunk of flesh was the SS cap on the air tube on the wheel. it had a valve stem remover end.
I don't know where you got that information but if it's true... Jesus H. Keeriste.
The wheel keeper came off , the wheel slipped over and caught his finger.
A good reminder that we should have all sharp thingys pointed away from the pilot or replace them with blunt objects. Plus wear leather gloves.
funkyglider - 2014/01/24 07:26:43 UTC
Vienna
smokenjoe50 - 2014/01/23 20:21:59 UTC

Unless you have a medical reason you are a shity pilot if you can't land on your feet. Wheels are for Falcons!
That answer just makes me sad...
Good thing, that words like that, thoughts like that
are just very very rare...
Yeah...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=12682
Landing on your feet (for AEROTOW)- So Dangerous
Jack Axaopoulos - 2009/06/29 14:26:26 UTC

OMG!!! You dont even have wheels!!?!?!?!? Image
YOURE GONNA DIE FOR SUUUUREE!!!! Image
Image
I have a brilliant idea. People who cant land for sh*t.... LEARN TO LAND Image That way when a weak link breaks on you, ITS A NON-ISSUE. Genius huh??? Image
Right.
Greets to ALL Pilots, let's just look after each other...

Alex
At a foot launch site when are the two most important seconds to be looking out for each other and what are you doing in that interval?
Comet - 2014/01/24 07:53:47 UTC

Note: Everyone who does stand-up landings, STOP IT - you're making wheel landers feel inferior.
Yeah...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuMxK9PadzA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaTu5Y4WBdY

18-3704
Image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2Gd2kcyOes

http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7094/13952342741_f71f343877_o.png
Image
Image
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7151/13952329131_03e535bc8b_o.png

Right.
Davis Straub - 2014/01/24 08:03:11 UTC

Assholery seems to be the standard operating procedure these days.
Yeah Davis, that would be your specialty.
2014/01/24 14:54:31 UTC - 3 thumbs up - NMERider
Rodger Hoyt - 2014/01/24 08:06:24 UTC

There's only ONE person on here using obscenities referring to other pilot Davis, and that is YOU.
Yeah. Obscenity is the big problem here. Not Pat almost getting a finger taken off by a valve stem on a soft easy landing at the Quest putting green where Shannon Moon got crippled out of the sport the better part of four years ago and Zack Marzec got killed out of it a bit shy of one year ago.
Rodger Hoyt - 2014/01/24 08:35:47 UTC

We were never talking about the disabled here.
All I've done is suggest that anyone (implied: who is capable) should learn a fundamental hang gliding skill of landing on their feet.
Where is it carved in granite that foot landing is a fundamental skill? Haven't some of these "disabled" folk rather conclusively proven that it ISN'T?

Foot landing evolved from the era of four to one standards. You can imagine how boring that got after half a dozen times.
- "So what are we are we gonna do now?"
- "Hey, let's have a spot landing contest! Like the skydivers do!"
- "Yeah! Cool! And let's make consecutive spot landings requirements for ratings!"
There are many places we typically fly where wheel landings would be impossible and/or dangerous - ie the sagebrush country of the western US.
"WE" who, motherfucker? Show me the videos. NOBODY is TYPICALLY landing in sagebrush. Anybody who typically did would last about three or four weekends before breaking an arm.
Or that rock you jumped over on one of your recent videos.
Show me the fuckin' video. I've got an archived video of Jonathan breaking a toe on one of those rocks.
A wheel landing there would have resulted in a face smash.
Here's a thought...

http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3858
Landing in the Big T wash
NMERider - 2013/04/05 21:09:27 UTC

There have been a number of bad landing incidents in the wash by a variety of experienced pilots because it is a dangerous bailout, period. It is NOT the club's landing zone either. It is a bailout and when it's hot on the surface it can and will bite you in the ass.
Don't land there.
Yet you say to encourage everyone to become proficient at stand-up landings is discriminatory?
It's organized slaughter. It's undoubtedly cost the participants and would-be participants of this sport tens of thousands of broken arms.
For many unexpected landing events it is absolutely necessary.
BULLSHIT. Conventional sailplanes, ultralight sailplanes, Alaskan bush pilots do just fine - and infinitely better than we do - without becoming proficient at and executing standup landings.
Erik Boehm - 2014/01/24 09:46:31 UTC

Wheeling it in on an atos seems like a bad idea.
Yeah.
Robert Moore - 2014/01/23 21:51:52 UTC

I don't know if I could ever bring myself to purposefully land on wheels in a prone position on a HG. It seems like the danger factor increases more than I would want.
It SEEMS like a bad idea. Dead fuckin' giveaway that you've got this deep inner conflict going on.
I don't know why you'd want to land prone, I don't want my basetube to get close to the ground, wheels or no wheels.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=26854
Skids versus wheels
Andrew Stakhov - 2012/08/11 13:52:35 UTC

So I just came back from flying in Austria (awesome place btw). Stark difference I noticed is a large chunk of pilots choose to fly with skids instead of wheels. Conversations I had with pilots they say they actually work better in certain situations as they don't get plugged up like smaller wheels. Even larger heavier Atosses were all flying with skids. I was curious why they consistently chose to land on skids on those expensive machines and they were saying that it's just not worth the risk of a mistimed flare or wing hitting the ground... And those are all carbon frames etc.
Then there's the issue of whacks and high aspect ratio gliders having the nose come in by your head/neck if you are prone...
How many of those Austrians who are using skids so they DON'T whack and damage their gliders are you hearing about getting their heads and necks drilled by the nose?
...(as recently happened in britain...
1. That one was a total clusterfuck. We can't be basing our decisions and policies on bogus conclusions drawn from freak clusterfucks.
2. That guy was coming in with the INTENT of making a standup landing.
...I don't know how bad that one turned out).
It turned out about as bad as things can get. We can't:
- afford to get into situations like that
- write procedures for dealing with situations like that
Wheels don't work if you don't have a nice smooth LZ, runout landings also have problems with rough terrain.
EX FUCKING ZACTLY.
No step landings are a skill you should have.
Along with time travel. That way when you come down in rough terrain and fail to nail your no-stepper you can get as many do-overs as it takes to eliminate tha runouts and bonks.
No step landings are a skill you should practice.
And who gives a fuck if you break an arm or neck while you're practicing on the putting green you ALWAYS land on for the rough terrain you NEVER land on - but MIGHT someday?
Is there a reason not to do them?
YES.

- The practice is...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22176
Paragliding Collapses
Jim Rooney - 2011/06/12 13:57:58 UTC

Most common HG injury... spiral fracture of the humerus.
...the single cause of the overwhelming majority of serious injuries in the sport.

- The need for this dubious skill is statistically nonexistent.

- The slowly growing number of people in this sport - paraplegics, knee and back cases, cowards - who land primarily or exclusively on wheels are statistically nonexistent in the landing crash/injury data.
Yes, its a free country...
BULL SHIT.
...you can launch unhooked...
But in order to do that you hafta violate the crap out of the USHGA regulation which states:
With each flight, demonstrates a method of establishing that the pilot is hooked in just prior to launch.
and you and your instructor should have your ratings suspended/revoked before that happens.
...and climb into the control frame if you want.
EVERYBODY who launches unhooked WANTS to climb into the control frame. Hardly ANYBODY is actually ABLE TO - regardless of how many pull-ups he can do at the gym.
This thread could just as easily be titled: "A good reason to land on your feet"
1. We don't need any. Everyone starts getting that bullshit drummed in on Day One, Flight One and there's never any letup.
2. Pat didn't get seriously fucked up because he wheel landed. He got fucked up by poorly engineered, installed, and maintained equipment.
Do as you want, but some things are just a better idea than others.
And you've never had a hint of a fuckin' clue what any of the better ideas actually ARE. In spades for your idiot asshole little brother.
NMERider - 2014/01/24 16:11:43 UTC
Rodger Hoyt - 2014/01/24 08:06:24 UTC

There's only ONE person on here using obscenities referring to other pilot Davis, and that is YOU.
Not quite Rodger,

I threw the gloves the down when this was posted...
smokenjoe50 - 2014/01/23 20:21:59 UTC

Unless you have a medical reason you are a shity pilot if you can't land on your feet. Wheels are for Falcons!
Emphasis added.

The kind of the juvenile, middle-school cafeteria rudeness, harassment and bullying toward others that Cryin_Ryan and others used to sling around should not be tolerated by anyone. sg only steps in when it becomes personal attack(s) on other(s).
sg's a sleazy lying coward who leads and coordinates personal attacks on others. Fuck him and any of his supporters.
For the most part this forum is self-moderated and we need more members to step in.
Fuck your intellectually castrated forum and its members.
Post Reply