instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Steve Davy - 2011/08/26 09:43:03 UTC
12-01.08 Two-Place Flights

A. Hang glider flights conducted under FAR 103 are restricted by federal aviation regulation to single place operations, except where they are conducted under the Tandem Exemption granted to the USHPA by the FAA. Such operations conducted under the Tandem Exemption are required by the terms of the exemption to be conducted under the applicable rules and procedures of USHPA SOP 12-02 and its supplements.
12-01.09 Aero Towing Operations

B. Aero towing flights in hang gliders which are not conducted under FAR Part 61 and FAR Part 91 are conducted under the FAA Towing Exemption. Such operations are required by the terms of the exemption to be conducted under the applicable rules and procedures of USHPA SOP 12-02 and its supplements.
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 09:55:52 UTC

Yeah, so?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 10:11:31 UTC

Oh, btw... before you go there, cuz it is where you're headed... please note the word "Guidelines".

As I said.
Been through this shit a million freaking times.
Please quit trying to educate me about my job.
I don't think anybody's trying to educate me about your job. As far as I'm concerned you had demonstrated far beyond any doubt that you'd never have any chance whatsoever of becoming fit and suitable for it when you first blighted the sport. No way in hell I'd have ever signed an asshole like you off on a Hang One. And even for those too stupid to appreciate that, any of their doubts should've been totally evaporated on 2006/02/21.

Yes, DO note the word "Guidelines". It was changed from the word "Requirements", illegally and UNDOUBTEDLY in response to Yours Truly starting to go into whistleblower mode, at some point between the 2009/03 and 2011/05 SOPs editions by the commercial interests whose motivation was, and IS, to shield itself as much as possible from the consequences of a negligent homicide charge for the kind of atrocities perpetrated at Hang Glide Chicago on 2004/06/26 and 2005/09/03 and Quest Air on 2013/02/02. The FAA granted USHGA an exemption to legally aerotow hang gliders on the condition that it adhered to REQUIREMENTS - not suggestions.

Note also in the course of that timespan the complete disappearance of any trace of:
The towed vehicle (un-powered ultralight) must meet or exceed the Hang Glider manufacturers Association's Airworthiness Standards.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22308
Better mouse trap(release)?
Jim Rooney - 2010/12/16 18:47:05 UTC

Oh, I've heard the "everything we do is an experiment" line before.
The trouble is, it's not.

I've seen experimentation with towing gear more than anything else in HG.
I've not seen many go out and try to build their own sails for example. When someone does, they're very quickly "shown the light" by the community. Example... the guy that was building the PVC glider in California somewhere.
But for some reason, towing gear is exempt from this.
So what are your thoughts on why USHGA wanted to make it legal for the guy to aerotow the PVC glider this guy somewhere in California was building? And what do you think the reaction from the FAA would've been...
The Press - 2006/03/15

The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) is urgently pushing for new hang-gliding industry standards after learning a hang-gliding pilot who suffered serious injuries in a crash three weeks ago had not clipped himself on to the glider.

Extreme Air tandem gliding pilot James (Jim) Rooney safely clipped his passenger into the glider before departing from the Coronet Peak launch site, near Queenstown, CAA sports and recreation manager Rex Kenny said yesterday.

However, he took off without attaching himself.

In a video, he was seen to hold on to the glider for about fifty meters before hitting power lines.

Rooney and the passenger fell about fifteen meters to the ground.
...if it had folded up on tow and killed its occupant - or, seeing as how there's now no longer a requirement for a tandem glider...

7-14522
Image

...to meet any certification standards either - occupantS?

You think USHGA got PERMISSION from the FAA to water down the agreement they made for the exemption? You think they advised the FAA any better than they advised the membership?

Furthermore, Mister Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney, which of the "GUIDELINES" in the AT SOPs do you feel you and/or others should ignore because they're no longer REQUIREMENTS? Since you're so fanatically dedicated to maximizing the safety of the people at both ends of the string - at any cost of "inconvenience"...

0:50
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR_4jKLqrus

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYe3YmdIQTM


...you must certainly be of the opinion that adhering to USHGA's "recommendations" would decrease the safety of the towing operation - PERIOD. So please tell us:

- what they are so we can ALL increase our safety margins by violating them; and...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=12443
AT regs
Mark G. Forbes - 2009/06/13 04:27:43 UTC

I just read the proposed changes that Tad posted. First I've heard of them. I know he was threatening to send a letter to the FAA, and I heard about *that*, but before that time I'd heard nothing. I wasn't in the aerotow committee meeting at the last BOD, because I was busy doing another committee at that time.

Action comes more swiftly when there's a clear threat to safety. I'm not seeing evidence (in the form of accidents or fatalities) that demonstrate that there's a major problem. There may be room for improvement, and that's certainly worth considering as we review and update our procedures, but I don't see the urgency of adopting these changes without careful consideration and the input of lots of other people involved in aerotowing. I'd want to hear what Steve Wendt, Jim Rooney, Malcolm Jones, Bobby Bailey, Steve Kroop, Dave Glover, John Kemmeries, Hungary Joe and others have to say as well. As your proposed language stands today, I would vote against it based on my concerns. That's not to say that you're wrong, but I haven't bought into your proposal yet myself, and I haven't heard other viewpoints sufficient to form an opinion that's favorable.
...why you and your pigfucker buddies haven't ever done shit in the way using your considerable influence to get the problematic ones - other than the one specifying an HGMA certifiable glider - revised, replaced, or eliminated.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37419
HG / PG the saga might not continue ?
Jim Rooney - 2014/05/08 14:09:31 UTC

I questioned SG about this years ago.
He said that it was his forum and that he actively promotes the denigration of PGs.
Yeah, he also actively promotes the denigration of Yours Truly and the idea that...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=11497
Aerotow release options?
Jack Axaopoulos - 2009/07/04 12:13:01 UTC

Bullshit.

a) only the pilot can let the angle of attack increase when you lose tension. Thats 100% on the pilot. You are simply wrong and misleading again.

b) "And if your angle of attack was way too high to begin with..." Which should never be the case or youre making a pilot error. Again, you are misleading people.

This is the problem I have with you. You attempt to fallaciously attribute pilot errors to issues of mechanical towing devices or other things.

Sorry... but if you suddenly lose power, your nose just doesnt pop Image
...a Rooney Link pop could never be anything more than a minor inconvenience for a halfway competent pilot. But we sure didn't hear much from him after your li'l tandem AT instructor buddy got splattered.
It's why I left.
You didn't just leave, Jim.
It's good to hear that some of the org's crowd has become less hostile, but till SG's policy changes (snowball in hell?), I won't be returning.
- Bet ya won't be returning to New Zealand to do tandems any time soon neither.

- Any thoughts on why your buddy Zack Marzec won't be returning to Currituck as a tandem aerotow instructor or your buddy Mark Knight won't be returning to Phoenix Regional as a Dragonfly driver?

- You don't have the option of returning.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=22212
So long guys
Jack Axaopoulos - 2011/06/12 18:20:06 UTC

Well I see now that you are threatening to delete your account in a PM if I dont delete it for you, which I can only assume means youre going to do what a certain other poster did and start vandalizing and deleting posts, so you force my hand... account banned so you cant vandalize. Well this truly sucks. Threatening to damage the site just because you got pissed off is really messed up dude. You need to seriously chill out.

Accounts cant be deleted. It screws all the threads up. Sorry, I cant let you just start trashing the place, which is your intent.

You could have simply said, so long guys, not enjoying it here anymore, instead of trashing us and threatening to damage the forum, which is why you are in the basement now. A gentlemens farewell would not be in the basement.

If you wish to lunge even more profanity at me, email me directly.
Both of you are lying pieces of shit but my feeling is that anybody with an ounce of integrity would respond to a accusation like that if it were false so I'm taking Jack's word on this one. And I notice that while you accuse him of actively promoting the denigration of paragliders you DON'T accuse him of lying about your actions on your way out.

- Do you read the Jack Show? Ever since...

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1041
"Sharing" of Hang Gliding Information ?!?
Merlin - 2012/05/26 14:22:30 UTC

I confess to previously having a bit of an Oz Report habit, but the forced login thing has turned me off permanently, and I am in fact grateful. Frankly, the site had pretty much been reduced to a few dedicated sycophants in any case.
...Davis locked his show down to just about everyone save for a few brain dead ass kissing dedicated sycophants it's about the only mainstream place you can go to read anything amusing. And since you're always sucking Davis's dick for him he's fine with you responding on his show to anything and everything that's happening over there. So why don't you? Ditto for...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/07 18:24:58 UTC

Go back to Tad's hole in the ground.
While you're there, ask him why he was banned from every east coast flying site.
...Tad's Hole in the Ground.
I don't care if people like PGs or not.
Depends a lot on who's underneath them.
I just don't care for a forum that makes one view or the other policy.
Unless it's in support of Rooney Links and bent pin releases.
Jim Rooney - 2014/05/08 18:52:34 UTC

Like I said, I don't care if people want to bash each other or not.
My issue was that SG not only condoned but encouraged it.
Kinda the way he never missed an opportunity to sabotage anything I was saying and coordinate his attack pigfuckers.
Life's too short for that.
Yours has been WAY too long. Too bad they were able to scrape you off that slope while you still had a detectable pulse.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 10:11:31 UTC

Oh, btw... before you go there, cuz it is where you're headed... please note the word "Guidelines".
Yeah, let's take a look at those "Guidelines"...
C. USHPA Aerotow Equipment Guidelines

1. The tow vehicle must have a rated thrust of at least 250 lbs.
- Note the word "MUST".

- No problem there. All you front end motherfuckers want all the thrust...

Image

...you can get. And you don't want it...
Wills Wing / Blue Sky / Steve Wendt / Ryan Voight Productions - 2007/03

NEVER CUT THE POWER...

Image

Reduce Gradually
Increase Gradually
...hanging by no thread, neither.
2. The tow line connection to the towing vehicle must be arranged so as to not hinder the control system of the towing vehicle.
- Note the word "MUST".

- It's just a "GUIDELINE" - so why don't you arrange the towline connection to the towing vehicle so as to hinder the control system of the towing vehicle? How come you arrange things so the towline's...

http://www.zenadsl2877.zen.co.uk/mf-aerotow/8-GermanDF-AWier.jpg
Image

...well aligned with the thrust line and centers of mass and drag?

- Think it might be a good idea to do something similar with the...

06-03114
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3728/9655895292_f4f808fb0e_o.png
Image

...towed vehicle? Think it's a good idea to...

03-02421
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7200/14097626583_03972773c6_o.png
Image

...arrange the towline connection to the towed vehicle such that the bar's stuffed a second after one comes off the cart - even if one IS a fuckin' pro? Pretty much ALL Dragonfly drivers are pros so if we're gonna arrange the towline connection to a vehicle so as to hinder a control system why don't we fuck up the one on the front end? Surely a professional of YOUR...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=16265
weaklinks
Kinsley Sykes - 2010/03/18 19:42:19 UTC

In the old threads there was a lot of info from a guy named Tad. Tad had a very strong opinion on weak link strength and it was a lot higher than most folks care for. I'd focus carefully on what folks who tow a lot have to say. Or Jim Rooney who is an excellent tug pilot. I tow with the "park provided" weak links. I think they are 130 pound Greenspot.
...caliber would be perfectly OK towing pro off just the bottom connection.
3. A pilot operational release must connect the tow line to the towing vehicle.
- Note the word "MUST".

- Would you rather have a pilot INoperational release connecting the towline to the towing vehicle - the way pretty much ALL...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/meaneyman/35642942/
Image
Image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/meaneyman/35642828/
Image
http://ozreport.com/pub/images/fingerlakesaccident2.jpg
http://ozreport.com/pub/images/fingerlakesaccident3.jpg
Image

...towed vehicles do?
This release must be operational with zero tow line force up to twice the rated breaking strength of the weak link.
- Note the word "MUST".

- What possible objections could you have to that one?

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3107
I have a tandem rating!!!
Lauren Tjaden - 2008/03/23 22:20:15 UTC

When Jim got me locked out to the right, I couldn't keep the pitch of the glider with one hand for more than a second (the pressure was a zillion pounds, more or less), but the F'ing release slid around when I tried to hit it. The barrel release wouldn't work because we had too much pressure on it.

Anyhow, the tandem can indeed perform big wingovers, as I demonstrated when I finally got separated from the tug.
Can you even imagine how dead Jim Prahl would've been killed if that had been a double loop of 130 pound Greenspot on a SOLO glider?
4. A weak link must be placed at both ends of the tow line.
- Note the word "MUST".

- Well...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21377
AT several Questions
Jim Rooney - 2011/04/03 12:37:14 UTC

This is first hand experience. Long bridles released under tension tend to grab. I am not guessing. This is not theory, although I can explain why this happens if you like. This is not something that I "think" is true or something that I've "heard". This is something that I've experienced... many times. I've also tested it just to know for sure.

I've been a full time professional aerotow tandem instructor for six years.
I've done thousands and thousands and thousands of tows.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14230
pro tow set-up
Jim Rooney - 2009/11/02 18:58:13 UTC

Oh it happens.
I have, all the guys I work with have.
(Our average is 1 in 1,000 tows)

Oh yeah... an other fun fact for ya... ya know when it's far more likely to happen? During a lockout. When we're doing lockout training, the odds go from 1 in 1,000 to over 50/50.
...you probably wouldn't want to put weak links at TOWLINE ends and/or on BOTH ends of the bridle.

-- Wouldn't be very sporting...
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

I witnessed a tug pilot descend low over trees. His towline hit the trees and caught. His weak link broke but the bridle whipped around the towline and held it fast. The pilot was saved by the fact that the towline broke!
...and...
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 17:34:33 UTC

Try fitting a straight pin release with anything but weaklink. (it doesn't quite fit the same) OH! Right. Just might be that we've thought of that eh?
...you'd have a hard time continuing on with your insane idiot drivel about how your bent pin crap is so great because it's easier to close over the end of a fat rope...

03-02421
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7200/14097626583_03972773c6_o.png
Image

...without installing a weak link.
The weak link at the glider end must have a breaking strength that will break before the towline tension exceeds twice the weight of the hang glider pilot and glider combination.
- Note the word "MUST".

- I'd think you'd like this one.

-- It doesn't specify a minimum so that makes it easier for you to get away with forcing heavier solo gliders to fly below the FAA mandatory minimum.

-- The USHGA maximum is below the FAA maximum for any glider that isn't flying with max hook-in weight.
The weak link at the tow plane end of the towline should break with a towline tension approximately 100lbs. greater than the glider end.
- Ooo! Look! After half a dozen "MUSTS" you finally get a "SHOULD". That way you can:
-- violate the crap out of the FAA weak link regulations
-- punish any heavier solo glider flying at mid legal range by ensuring that HE will end up with 250 feet of Spectra draped over his basetube
-- pull ALL tandems in flagrant violation of All of the FAA weak link regulations:
--- placement
--- minimum glider
--- tug heavier than glider
5. A release must be placed at the hang glider end of the tow line within easy reach of the pilot.
- Note the word "MUST".

- Since a release "within easy reach of the pilot"...

01-001
Image
04-200
Image
07-300
Image
10-307
Image
15-413
Image
Image
http://ozreport.com/pub/images/fingerlakesaccident2.jpg
http://ozreport.com/pub/images/fingerlakesaccident3.jpg
Image

...is like a child-safe crocodile infested river you can continue to:

-- force people up on your cheap bent pin Industry Standard shit

-- get them to use your 130 pound Greenspot pitch and lockout placebos / whipstall inducers

-- tell all the assholes who tow behind you that they're subhuman morons because they too stupid to ALWAYS RELEASE THE TOWLINE before there is a problem

- Also since there's no reach involved with releases like:

02-1302
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7117/13700891354_b31d51ed74_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2938/13700558193_0e0946218e_o.png
03-1304

and:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh3-uZptNw0


they're not acceptable and you can keep them out of circulation and keep pissing all over the people who've spent good chunks of their lives developing, testing, refining, documenting them.
This release shall be operational with zero tow line force up to twice the rated breaking strength of the weak link.
- Note the word "SHALL". That's a synonym for "MUST".

- Seems like a huge waste of engineering to me. Everybody knows that...

http://www.wallaby.com/aerotow_primer.php
Aerotow Primer for Experienced Pilots
The Wallaby Ranch Aerotowing Primer for Experienced Pilots - 2014/05/08

If you fail to maintain the correct tow position (centered, with the wheels of the tug on the horizon), the weak link will break before you can get into too much trouble.
...if you fail to maintain the correct tow position (centered, with the wheels of the tug on the horizon), the weak link will break before you can get into too much trouble.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYdSi9A37Ms

05-0704
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7367/14111450924_7a92327e68_o.png
Image

See? I have no idea why people bother flying with releases at all - let alone ones that can handle...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21033
barrels release without any tension except weight of rope..
Bart Weghorst - 2011/02/25 19:06:26 UTC

But I've had it once where the pin had bent inside the barrel from excessive tow force. My weaklink was still intact. The tug pilot's weaklink broke so I had the rope. I had to use two hands to get the pin out of the barrel.
No stress because I was high.
...twice weak link.
6. The purpose of the weak link is to protect the tow equipment...
- No "MUSTS", "SHALLS", or "SHOULDS" there. Funny that it's in the Standard Operating Procedures 'cause it doesn't tell you how to proceed - just flatly contradicts Donnell Hewett, Dennis Excellent-Book Pagen, Malcolm Jones, Matt Taber, Lauren Eminently-Qualified-Tandem-Pilot Tjaden...

- Says "The purpose". That's singular. Doesn't say "One of the purposes...". Is THAT...
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 02:44:10 UTC

Zach, you can nit pick all you like, but I'll put a 100,000+ flight record over your complaints any day of the week.

Let me see if I can clear up a few things for ya.
A lot of this I sent to Steve btw...

The "purpose" of a weaklink is not in question. Your semantics are.
The "purpose" of a weaklink is to increase the safety of the towing operation. PERIOD.

There are many ways in which it accomplishes this.
You're nit picking over what you call the "true purpose"... but all you're griping about is a definition... and an erroneous one at that.

Again, The weak link increases the safety of the tow.

Now, how it does this also provides a telling answer to one of the most hot button topics surrounding weak links... lockouts.
People will rail up and down that weaklinks do not protect against lockouts... which they don't.
But this is a half truth.

The whole truth is that while they don't prevent them, they help.

Where this discrepancy comes from is truck towing.
See, in truck towing, a weaklink does next to nothing for you (unless the line snags).
This is because you're on a pressure regulated system... so the forces never get high enough to break the link.

This is not the case with an aerotow.
This is why the weaklink exists.

The forces of an aerotow can get high enough to tear the wings off the glider.
This is no exaggeration... it can be done.

So think about it.
How is this accomplished?
Simply put... lock out.

So, in a lock out, the forces can very rapidly get so high as to destroy the glider?
So then, weaklinks do not help in a lock out situation?
You can see what I'm getting at here can't you?

Argue all you like about the "true" purpose of a weaklink... but it's only you that's arguing.
I find no disagreement in the professional community as to such.
I only find a disconnect when they're talking to the general public, and it always boils down to semantics.

See, we're not confused.
You're searching for an argument and only finding it within yourself.

This btw is one of the main reasons that most of the professionals do not bother with the forums.
Cuz it's generally a bitchfest around here.

Instead of looking for an argument, you may consider listening instead.
...the "Guideline" you're so happy is no longer is a "Requirement"?

But then it goes on to say:
...and may not prevent lockouts or other abnormal flight conditions.
So it MAY. So that's why you should use a really light one because it MAY prevent lockouts or other abnormal flight conditions, the lighter the safer, and weak link breaks are mere inconveniences for anyone with flying ability.

A weak link is like a parachute. It MAY not prevent fatal impacts resulting from stalls, spins, tumbles, broken gliders but it MAY - so everyone should use really big ones that spill out of their containers every other flight.
As I said.
Been through this shit a million freaking times.
Please quit trying to educate me about my job.
Yeah, motherfucker... Despite the subterfuge of substituting "Guidelines" for "Requirements" that document has seven "musts" and a "shall" in it. Those are REQUIREMENTS. And the one "should" it contains is a despicable cop-out installed to accommodate that piece of crap Bobby Fucking-Genius Bailey "designed" and the cowardly idiot douchebags who fly it.

REAL pilots don't fly under GUIDELINES and the OPINIONS of total idiots who fly aircraft that have shit to do with the aircraft THEY'RE flying and the problems IT faces. The fly under hard and fast RULES based on solid THEORY. And THEORY is something that will continue to remain beyond your grasp for the rest of your - hopefully short - miserable existence.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30199
Incident - 2013/06/16
michael170 - 2014/05/09 03:18:14 UTC

Ok, Paul H, what is it about these posts you find worthy of a negative grading? Are you just being an ass...
michael170 - 2013/10/27 19:03:11 UTC
2013/10/28 05:07:59 UTC - Sink This! -- Paul Hurless
2013/10/28 12:03:45 UTC - Sink This! -- Christopher Albers
michael170 - 2013/10/29 19:41:43 UTC
2013/10/29 19:44:48 UTC - Sink This! -- Paul Hurless
Motherfucker doesn't have any CHOICE on that one. It's like asking a Gray Squirrel if he's just being a Gray Squirrel. Incredibly long DNA issues. (No offence intended, Gray Squirrels... just needed an example.)
...or do you find something objectionable about incidents posted in the incidents sub-forum?
Well, YEAH! If people start posting about INCIDENTS in the Incident Reports subforum - way the fuck down the page after:
- Hang gliding general
- Hang gliding Videos
- Q&A, Learning to hang glide
- Flying Stories + Flight Reports
- Growing the Sport of HG
where are we gonna put topics like:

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30331
$8.00 per pass, $8.00 ! ! Crooks
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30582
First Beach Landing in My New F4
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30464
Brain Box and Helmet Articles.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30644
crazy
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30887
Skydiver-Cessna 140 Mid-Air - Must See!
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30741
How do I add my own pic to set my Avatar
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30913
My Training Week at Lookout Mountain Flight Park
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=31217
Tuning an old K2 155

(From the 25 topics on the current first page.)
Paul Hurless - 2014/05/09 05:11:31 UTC
Sparks, Nevada

That was a while ago, but I was probably just objecting to your Tad-like way of reporting incidents. You know, how everyone is wrong about everything unless they do things his/your way.
Yeah Paul. He makes TWO posts consisting ENTIRELY of QUOTES (one and seven) without so much as a SINGLE PUNCTUATION MARK of any comment of his own and that makes it a Tad-like way of reporting incidents - you know, how everyone is wrong about everything unless they do things his/his way.

- Do you EVER get tired of re-proving what a total moron you are? (Rhetorical question.)

- Reminds me a lot of:

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=13744
control

- Wanna talk about how everyone is wrong about everything unless they do things his way?

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=13359
Today was a bad day!
Mike Bomstad - 2009/08/26 04:21:15 UTC

The harness is part of the aircraft... end of story.
(Just because it's easy to remove, does not mean it should be. Dont choose the path of least resistance)

Attach it to the wing, completing the aircraft.... then preflight the completed aircraft.
Buckle yourself into the cockpit and then your ready.
11-A12819
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8339/28924980016_2ba1d20ef7_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8253/28924975726_0d24a615c2_o.png
13-A14319

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22308
Better mouse trap(release)?
Jim Rooney - 2010/12/16 18:47:05 UTC

A few years ago, I started refusing to tow people with home made gear.
I like the idea of improving gear, but the lack of appreciation for the world they were stepping into didn't sit with me.
For example... flying with the new gear in mid day conditions?
Are you kidding me????

Approach it for what it is... completely untested and very experimental gear which will likely fail in new and unforseen ways as it tries it's damndest to kill you... and then we can talk.
http://ozreport.com/12.081
Weaklinks - the HGFA rules
Davis Straub - 2008/04/22 14:47:00 UTC
Pilots must use weaklinks provided by the meet organizers and in a manner approved by the meet organizers. All weaklinks will be checked and use of inappropriate weaklinks will require the pilot to go to the end of the launch line to change the weaklink.

Weaklinks will consist of a single loop of Cortland 130 lb. Greenspot braided Dacron Tolling line and should be placed at one end of a shoulder bridle.
At the 2008 Forbes Flatlands Greenspot for the first time was used as the standard weaklink material (thanks in large part to the efforts of Bobby Bailey). We applaud these efforts to improve the safety of aerotowing by using a better weaklink material.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bRrpHNa68iY/UQ6Pv9gRZyI/AAAAAAAAjTg/Hc22bx5122Q/s2048/20943781_BG1.jpg
Image

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/28 01:17:55 UTC

Well said Billo
I'm a bit sick of all the armchair experts telling me how my friend died.

Ah but hg'ers get so uppity when you tell them not to speculate.
- In REAL aviation and the microscopic little fragment of hang gliding that's got things right you WILL find ONE best way of doing something for the circumstances...

13-03110
http://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3697/13700915564_87a2a336b0_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2912/13700562685_86575e9220_o.png
14-03129
02-1302
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7117/13700891354_b31d51ed74_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2938/13700558193_0e0946218e_o.png
03-1304
43-13601
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7426/14066736124_357e1df5c6_o.png
Image

And people DO have it right and aren't calling everyone who doesn't...

2-112
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7600/28811055456_925c8abb66_o.png
Image
2-005
Image
08-2323
http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5553/14097605903_0e4c69be73_o.png
Image
Image
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7345/14077539605_d356a1f6fd_o.png
22-2907
32-1901
Image

...a total moron are doing shit jobs for the sport.
Just like when you throw that BS out there about "whipstalling".
In what context? For safe landings? Rooney Link induced to increase the safety of the towing operation? Both?

Couldn't you just compose a good post about what a great thing whipstalls are for the sport instead of clicking all those Sink Thisses? That sort of thing has never diminished your popularity on The Jack Show before.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 10:11:31 UTC

Oh, btw... before you go there, cuz it is where you're headed... please note the word "Guidelines".
And oh, by the way... While you're going there please note the words "AND ITS *SUPPLEMENTS*".

And here's one of its most important SUPPLEMENTS - albeit one which USHGA went to great lengths to conceal from its membership for a couple months shy of eight years (until Dr. Trisa Tilletti published his total bullshit article showing how USHGA had been operating legally during that entire period by throwing all solo gliders up on single loops of 130 pound Greenspot and all tandems up on doubles):
CFR > Title 14 > Chapter I > Subchapter F > Part 91 > Subpart D > Section 91.309

§ 91.309 Towing: Gliders and unpowered ultralight vehicles.

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft towing a glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle unless-

- (1) The pilot in command of the towing aircraft is qualified under § 61.69 of this chapter;

- (2) The towing aircraft is equipped with a tow-hitch of a kind, and installed in a manner, that is approved by the Administrator;

- (3) The towline used has breaking strength not less than 80 percent of the maximum certificated operating weight of the glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle and not more than twice this operating weight. However, the towline used may have a breaking strength more than twice the maximum certificated operating weight of the glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle if-

-- (i) A safety link is installed at the point of attachment of the towline to the glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle with a breaking strength not less than 80 percent of the maximum certificated operating weight of the glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle and not greater than twice this operating weight;

-- (ii) A safety link is installed at the point of attachment of the towline to the towing aircraft with a breaking strength greater, but not more than 25 percent greater, than that of the safety link at the towed glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle end of the towline and not greater than twice the maximum certificated operating weight of the glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle;

- (4) Before conducting any towing operation within the lateral boundaries of the surface areas of Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace designated for an airport, or before making each towing flight within such controlled airspace if required by ATC, the pilot in command notifies the control tower. If a control tower does not exist or is not in operation, the pilot in command must notify the FAA flight service station serving that controlled airspace before conducting any towing operations in that airspace; and

- (5) The pilots of the towing aircraft and the glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle have agreed upon a general course of action, including takeoff and release signals, airspeeds, and emergency procedures for each pilot.

(b) No pilot of a civil aircraft may intentionally release a towline, after release of a glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle, in a manner that endangers the life or property of another.

[Doc. No. 18834, 54 FR 34308, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 91-227, 56 FR 65661, Dec. 17, 1991; Amdt. 91-282, 69 FR 44880, July 27, 2004]
Note the reference to...
The pilot in command of the towing aircraft is qualified under § 61.69 of this chapter...
..."the Pilot In Command of the TOWING AIRCRAFT". Note that the FAA does NOT ever refer to him as "the Pilot In Command of the towing aircraft AND the unpowered ultralight vehicle".

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3600
Weak link question
Jim Rooney - 2008/11/24 05:18:15 UTC

Well, I'm assuming there was some guff about the tug pilot's right of refusal?
Gee, didn't think we'd have to delve into "pilot in command"... I figured that one's pretty well understood in a flying community.

It's quite simple.
The tug is a certified aircraft... the glider is an unpowered ultralight vehicle. The tug pilot is the pilot in command. You are a passenger. You have the same rights and responsibilities as a skydiver.
It's a bitter pill I'm sure, but there you have it.
The Pilot In Command...
Made at least three flights as pilot in command of a glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle...
...of an unpowered ultralight vehicle has the same rights and responsibilities as the fucking Pilot In Command of a fucking certified and registered sailplane.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/16 05:05:41 UTC

Ok, keyboard in hand.
I've got a bit of time, but I'm not going to write a dissertation... so either choose to try to understand what I'm saying, or (as is most often the case) don't.
I don't care.

Here's a little bit of bitter reality that ya'll get to understand straight off. I won't be sugar coating it, sorry.
You see, I'm on the other end of that rope.
I want neither a dead pilot on my hands or one trying to kill me.
And yes. It is my call. PERIOD.
On tow, I am the PIC.

Now, that cuts hard against every fiber of every HG pilot on the planet and I get that.
Absolutely no HG pilot likes hearing it. Not me, not no one. BUT... sorry, that's the way it is.
Accept it and move on.
Not only can you not change it, it's the law... in the very literal sense.
Here's a little bit of bitter reality that you need to understand straight off. I won't be sugarcoating it, sorry.

You see, I'm on the other end of that rope. I don't really give a rat's ass what happens to the guys on the front end 'cause they're pretty much all total fucking assholes who, collectively, have done ENORMOUS damage to the sport of hang gliding, ruined a lot of the best flying opportunities a lot of people will ever see, crashed a lot of gliders, and killed a fair number of the people on it.

I care about ME and getting to altitude safely and efficiently. You do the same and we'll get along fine. You violate the law, deviate from the flight plan, try to act as Pilot In Command of MY plane, endanger me I'll take you to court and have your balls torn off.

It is was your call - PERIOD...
Mr. Orders, as Pilot In Command, was solely responsible for the safety of his passenger.
...to launch that tandem with the same number of harnesses connected to the glider as Jon Orders did so you deserve EXACTLY the same treatment got - even if your victim DID luck out pretty well on the outcome.
On tow, I am the PIC.
On tow you are A Pilot In Command - or you would be in an imaginary world in which you could attain enough in the way of brains and competence to be considered a PILOT. You're the one driving the expendable gas guzzling piece of junk that's supposed to be SERVING this sport and we're the ones who pay you to do the job. You're the equivalent of some jerk who drives a glider laden truck up the mountain, drops the PILOTS and gear off so's they can fly, then drives back down for another load.

Now, that cuts hard against every fiber of every Dragonfly driving douchebag on the planet and it's really hard to get you guys to pull your heads out of your asses enough to get it but, sorry, that's the way it is. Not only can you not change it, it's the law... in the very literal sense - motherfucker.

Note that it is ILLEGAL to tow ANYTHING with ANYTHING that BREAKS - and anything that breaks...

Donnell Hewett, well respected for his knowledge of towing, bridles, and weak links:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/skysailingtowing/message/4597
Weaklinks
2005/02/08 23:28:13 UTC

Every towing system, without exception, contains a weaklink. It may be a string or mechanical device deliberately inserted into the towline, the towline itself, the release mechanism, the flying wires of the glider, the pilot's harness (when body towing), or some other component of the pilot-glider-tug system. But something eventually is going to be the first thing to break. That thing is the weaklink.

...towline, tow ring, bridle, release, back end weak link, tow mast breakaway, tow mast breakaway protector is THE weak link - at under eighty percent of the max certified operating weight of whatever's on the back end - regardless of any OPINIONS of any assholes on either end of the string or on the ground running a flight park or pecker measuring contest.

And NO, Trisa, it is NOT legal to fly on weak links of ASSUMED or WIDELY *BELIEVED* strengths and claim that bench test results are invalid because you and I both know that lab tests may produce results with good internal validity, but are often weak in regard to external validity--meaning lab conditions cannot completely include all the factors and variability that exist in the big, real world. And fuck your sleazy backgrounds in formal research.

Note that it says:
A safety link is installed at the point of attachment of the towline to the glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle...
and NOT...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21377
AT several Questions
Jim Rooney - 2011/04/02 18:08:49 UTC

Long bridals released under tension tend to grab things. It doesn't matter what you have on the tow rope. The day that thing snags, you will wish that you had a release on the other side as well. A weak link is also sufficient.
...on one end of a bridle 'cause, hell, you've got some bent pin piece of crap on the other - and a hook knife for when that welds itself shut.

Note that it says the same thing...
A safety link is installed at the point of attachment of the towline to the towing aircraft...
...for the same reason...
Towing Aloft - 1998/01

I witnessed a tug pilot descend low over trees. His towline hit the trees and caught. His weak link broke but the bridle whipped around the towline and held it fast. The pilot was saved by the fact that the towline broke!
...for the tug's weak link configuration. What's your Plan B for that one - asshole? At least there are a few gliders out there fully weak link protected. The number of Dragonflies fully protected is ZERO 'cause...
As I said.
Been through this shit a million freaking times.
Please quit trying to educate me about my job.
...none of you off the scale stupid motherfuckers will tolerate anyone trying to educate him about his job. And I sincerely hope that the NEXT TIME the towline hits the trees and catches, THE weak link breaks, and the bridle wraps at the tow ring that the towline DOESN'T break. You assholes still won't put a weak link at the other end of the bridle and/or the front end of the towline but it'll be fun to watch the discussions you'll have about light polypro towlines, steeper approaches, faster deploying ballistic parachutes, heavier helmets, tree removal, and what a really great guy he was and how he died doing what he loved.
...with a breaking strength greater, but not more than 25 percent greater, than that of the safety link at the towed glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle end of the towline and not greater than twice the maximum certificated operating weight of the glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle
Yeah right.

- The whole idiot Dragonfly is designed around a breakaway tow mast which would blow at the same tension as the weak link you originally used on the tug bridle which was the same weak link you used on all tandem gliders which was based upon a bunch of idiot bullshit assumptions you pulled out of your asses.

- Then you worked out over the course of several decades of experience and hundreds of thousands of tows conducted by numerous aerotow operators across the county that a breakaway tow mast designed to break away at the same tension it took to blow a four strand weak link would break away at the same tension it took to blow a four strand weak link.

- Then after some really embarrassing questions from Yours Truly...
Tad Eareckson - 2008/11/24 06:16:08 UTC

Would someone - Brian, Janni, Lauren, ANYONE - PLEASE PLEASE explain to me how the tug's ass is endangered by a double loop ONLY when it's on a SOLO glider but not at all when it's on a TANDEM?
...and a few more hundreds of thousands of tows conducted by numerous aerotow operators across the county you worked out that the back end weak link couldn't override your three strander and started not giving much of a rat's ass who got left with the rope - seeing how it had become a certainty...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24534
It's a wrap
Lauren Tjaden - 2011/07/29 15:16:29 UTC

I was flying a tandem this morning, and when I released (from the three point bridle) the line briefly released and then wrapped around the 'biner that we tow from. The sharp, strong pull almost immediately broke the weak link on the tug plane, which of course left me with the rope. I released the bridle from my shoulders (with the barrel release) and dropped the rope over the field without incident.

When I retrieved the rope and bridle after the flight, I was shocked at how profoundly the line had wrapped around the 'biner. I have heard about the line being able to wrap, but in thousands of aerotows I have never experienced it. I thought readers might be interested to see actually happens.
ImageImageImageImage
Secondly, although the weak link wasn't tremendously large, in retrospect in could have been smaller. Apparently the longer the weak link the greater its propensity to wrap. I also included a photo showing the size of the weak link. (I removed it from the 'biner after taking the photos.) Just a reminder for folks to keep their weak links on the stingy side.
...that the tandem would get it a hundred percent of the time anyway - along with most solos flying in the middle of the legal range.
The pilots of the towing aircraft and the glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle...
Note that it refers to TWO PILOTS - not the Pilot In Command at the safe end and the muppet passenger at the dangerous end. And I wonder what kind of total asshole signs off another total asshole...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=17404
Aerotow barrel release - straight or curved pin?
Jim Rooney - 2010/05/31 01:53:13 UTC

BTW, Steve Wendt is exceptionally knowledgeable. Hell, he's the one that signed off my instructor rating.
...without that point being made blindingly clear.
...have agreed upon a general course of action, including takeoff and release signals, airspeeds, and emergency procedures for each pilot.
Bullshit.
Davis Straub - 2011/08/28 15:26:28 UTC

Then again, Russell Brown had us double up behind him after six breaks in a row at Zapata. We couldn't figure out why we had so many breaks so quickly. Maybe just coincidence.
- There can't be any PLANS for a flight when the REAL Pilot In Command is a loop of 130 pound fishing line - and the CAUSE...

http://ozreport.com/9.032
The Worlds - weaklinks
Davis Straub - 2005/02/07

For a couple of years I have flown with a doubled weaklink because, flying with a rigid wing glider, I have found that there is little reason to expect trouble on tow, except from a weaklink break.
...of nearly all emergency situations encountered and crashes in hang glider aerotowing.

- And the second most problematic emergency encountered - and the one most likely to result in a serious injury or death - simply cannot be dealt with using the shit equipment you compel everyone to fly with. Your options are to fight for control and slam in because you didn't release:

Image
http://ozreport.com/pub/images/fingerlakesaccident2.jpg
http://ozreport.com/pub/images/fingerlakesaccident3.jpg
Image

or execute the easy reach to your "release" and slam in because you stopped fighting for control:

01-001
Image
04-200
Image
07-300
Image
10-307
Image
15-413
Image

Either way you're gonna slam in and Davis - who's been at an around all this plenty long enough to understand what's what and who's who - comes out better after doing nothing than Ollie comes out by doing something.

I think we should get another FAA Exemption for a blanket emergency procedure being "Hope it doesn't happen - 'cause if it does you're FUCKED." How 'bout it, Mister Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney? Sound like a good plan?
No pilot of a civil aircraft may intentionally release a towline, after release of a glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle, in a manner that endangers the life or property of another.
But if it's an UNintentional release as a result of an illegally light front end weak link...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=865
Tandem pilot and passenger death
Mike Van Kuiken - 2005/10/10 18:44:27 UTC

I watched the glider come almost straight down from about 250 feet. I saw that Jeremiah was doing the takeoff right from the start and I watched him get pretty low on the tow as the tug crossed the road at the end of the runway.
Mike Van Kuiken - 2005/10/13 19:47:26 UTC

The weak link broke from the tow plane side. The towline was found underneath the wreck, and attached to the glider by the weaklink. The glider basically fell on the towline.
...and the towline stays with the glider until and long after it's slammed in near a road and whoever's under it is dead it's perfectly OK, right?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30199
Incident - 2013/06/16
Paul Hurless - 2014/05/09 05:11:31 UTC

That was a while ago, but I was probably just objecting to your Tad-like way of reporting incidents. You know, how everyone is wrong about everything unless they do things his/your way. Just like when you throw that BS out there about "whipstalling".
2014/05/10 05:51:01 UTC - Sink This! -- Paraglider Collapse
Ooo! And Paul gets a negative for his totally idiotic post attacking Tad and a Tad-Clone. That sure doesn't happen very often.
michael170 - 2014/05/10 22:46:43 UTC

How's that release design of yours coming along?
THIS:

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=11998
Tad Report...
Paul Hurless - 2009/05/15 01:43:43 UTC

Yes, I can do better. It took me all of two minutes to come up with a simple (darn, the KISS principal keeps popping up) system that only has two moving parts; the cord to actuate it and the actual release that holds onto the tow line. It's almost completely internal in the control bar and a downtube, only emerging at the control bar for the hand to actuate it and at the top of the downtube where it goes to the release mechanism. No pulleys, springs, or bungees needed. If you are doubting me I could send you a sketch.
Red Howard - 2009/05/15 01:55:35 UTC
Utah

Yes, sketch please. I do not doubt you, though; I am just looking to learn, here.
Paul Hurless - 2009/05/15 03:02:47 UTC

I'll have to draw it out legibly and then scan it so it may be a day or so.
release design? That was four days shy of five years ago. I'll bet he's got it simplified so well it doesn't exist. I'll bet he figured you could just chew through the bridle when you wanted off.
Paul Hurless - 2014/05/10 23:10:01 UTC

I actually came up with several. I'm not interested in producing any, so they would only be for myself, but since I am not currently doing any aerotowing I haven't bothered.
And I came up with five designs for a new carrier based fighter - all of which kick the F-18's ass - speed, maneuverability, strength, weight, range, ceiling, fuel efficiency, cost maintenance... But I'm not interested in producing any, so they would only be for myself. But since I've just developed a passion for collecting lawn flamingos I probably won't bother.
There are numerous ways to make sound, easy to operate releases that mount into the glider on a semi-permanent way and operate while keeping both hands on the control frame...
Why would that be of any advantage?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30971
Zach Marzec
Viktor Moroz - 2013/02/09 17:26:52 UTC

Other thing I know: a lot of pilots are afraid to take away one hand form a bar while the bar pressure is scary high. They think the glider immediately will do something bad. It's a delusion.
Everybody knows it's a total delusion that it helps to keep two hands on the basetube in an emergency situation.

If it WERE an advantage what's the problem with just...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14230
pro tow set-up
Ryan Voight - 2009/11/03 05:24:31 UTC

It works best in a lockout situation... if you're banked away from the tug and have the bar back by your belly button... let it out. Glider will pitch up, break weaklink, and you fly away.

During a "normal" tow you could always turn away from the tug and push out to break the weaklink... but why would you?

Have you never pondered what you would do in a situation where you CAN'T LET GO to release? I'd purposefully break the weaklink, as described above. Instant hands free release Image
...pitching up, breaking the Rooney Link, and flying away. And Ryan says it works BEST in a lockout situation. The more dangerous the lockout the better it works. How can you POSSIBLY beat something like that?

None of your designs would stand the test of reality. If they WOULD...
Jim Rooney - 2013/02/12 18:00:27 UTC

I just buried my friend and you want me to have a nice little discussion about pure speculation about his accident so that some dude that's got a pet project wants to push his theories?

Deltaman loves his mouth release.
BFD

I get tired as hell "refuting" all these mouth release and "strong link" arguments. Dig through the forums if you want that. I've been doing it for years but unfortunately the peddlers are religious in their beliefs so they find justification any way they can to "prove" their stuff. This is known as "Confirmation Bias"... seeking data to support your theory... it's back-asswards. Guess what? The shit doesn't work. If it did, we'd be using it everywhere. But it doesn't stand the test of reality.

AT isn't new. This stuff's been worked on and worked over for years and thousands upon thousands of tows. I love all these egomaniacs that jump up and decide that they're going to "fix" things, as if no one else has ever thought of this stuff?
...everyone would be using them everywhere.

Any thoughts on...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22308
Better mouse trap(release)?
Jim Rooney - 2010/12/16 18:47:05 UTC

A few years ago, I started refusing to tow people with home made gear.
I like the idea of improving gear, but the lack of appreciation for the world they were stepping into didn't sit with me.
For example... flying with the new gear in mid day conditions?
Are you kidding me????

Approach it for what it is... completely untested and very experimental gear which will likely fail in new and unforseen ways as it tries it's damndest to kill you... and then we can talk.
...where you'd put something together?

What length would...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Jim Rooney - 2011/08/26 17:34:33 UTC

My point is that everything has issues. Everything. Period.
Will I fly with a straight pin release? Sure.
Does it have the track record of the curved pins? No.
...it's track record be?
...and without being a rube golberg type like those favored by your hero, Tad.
Really?
Zack C - 2011/01/10 14:28:40 UTC

When I first saw your release years ago on the Oz Report forum my impression was the same as most people's. I didn't know what the pictures were showing but it looked way more complicated than it needed to be. After seeing the problems that even the best releases on the market have and learning more about your release, however, I understand why you made it the way you did and the advantages it provides.
There are tons of designs that work great when douchebags who've never engineered a goddam thing in their entire useless existences are talking out of their asses and promising cocktail napkin sketches that never seem to appear.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21377
AT several Questions
Davis Straub - 2011/04/05 14:00:25 UTC

The flight park procedures here at Quest Air are the result of years of evolutionary pressures and experience that provide the focus on safety.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24534
It's a wrap
Paul Tjaden - 2011/07/30 15:33:54 UTC

Quest Air has been involved in perfecting aerotowing for nearly twenty years.
So you're saying that you can easily do better than what the professionals from Quest have been refining and perfecting for twenty years?

Shouldn't you get in touch with...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31052
Poll on weaklinks
Jim Rooney - 2013/03/03 19:37:19 UTC

My response is short because I've been saying it for years... and yes, I'm a bit sick of it.
This is a very old horse and has been beaten to death time and time again... by a very vocal minority.

See, most people are happy with how we do things. This isn't an issue for them. They just come out and fly. Thing's aren't perfect, but that's life... and life ain't perfect. You do what you can with what you've got and you move on.

But then there's a crowd that "knows better". To them, we're all morons that can't see "the truth".
(Holy god, the names I've been called.)

I have little time for these people.

It saddens me to know that the rantings of the fanatic fringe mask the few people who are actually working on things.
...the few people who are actually working on things so they can stop working on releases and focus more on better ways to tie 130 pound Greenspot to keep the knot better hidden from the main tension in the loop?
Even the Bailey releases your mentor hates can be mounted to be operated that way. It's not rocket science.
Under how much pressure...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=14230
pro tow set-up
Paul Hurless - 2009/11/06 02:59:01 UTC

Those releases have curved pins, not bent. There is a difference.
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=21033
barrels release without any tension except weight of rope..
Bart Weghorst - 2011/02/25 19:06:26 UTC

But I've had it once where the pin had bent inside the barrel from excessive tow force. My weaklink was still intact. The tug pilot's weaklink broke so I had the rope. I had to use two hands to get the pin out of the barrel.
No stress because I was high.
...will they work?
If you were really interested, instead of just trying to be a shit-stirrer, you would be able to figure this simple sort of thing out for yourself.
How do you know he HASN'T - asshole?
Ok, PC, here's another post for you to give a thumbs down rating to.
There'd be a whole slew of those if Jack's Show had anything left in the way of integrity.

So you say that there's a significant advantage to...
British Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association Technical Manual - 2003/04

On tow the Pilot in Command must have his hand actually on the release at all times. 'Near' the release is not close enough! When you have two hands completely full of locked-out glider, taking one off to go looking for the release guarantees that your situation is going to get worse before it gets better.
...being able to blow tow with both hands on the basetube. And everyone and his dog was on board with that one until Donnell came along with his fishing line, parachute shroud line, and tension gauges and told everyone there wasn't.

And it's a no brainer that if - on her second AT solo on 2011/10/28 - sixteen year old Lois Preston had been protected under the same release equipment standards as BHPA sets for its precious fucking tandem flights she'd have been totally OK.

And you've got all these wonderful superior designs that would require three or four bucks worth of materials and twenty minutes worth of assembly effort well within the capability of any idiot but you've been sitting on them for five years because YOU aren't currently aerotowing - and way too busy pissing all over the stuff that other people have put into the air with outstanding success?

What a total piece o' shit you are, Paul.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30199
Incident - 2013/06/16
michael170 - 2014/05/11 02:43:34 UTC
I actually came up with several.
Wow! You "came up with several", I'm impressed!
I'm not interested in producing any, so they would only be for myself, but since I am not currently doing any aerotowing I haven't bothered.
So you haven't "actually" built and tested anything, yet consider yourself qualified to piss on designs that have been built, tested, and then put in the air. No surprise there.
He doesn't necessarily consider himself qualified - it's just that he enjoys it so much and can't think of anything better to do.
There are numerous ways to make sound, easy to operate releases that mount into the glider on a semi-permanent way
Oh! So if you make the assembly semi-PERMANENT...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=11497
Aerotow release options?
Paul Hurless - 2009/05/01 15:05:14 UTC

Good luck getting the manufacturers to incorporate tow releases into their gliders. That's an expense and liability that I don't believe too many would want to undertake. I would think that there would have to be something added to the HGMA certification process, too, for something added to a glider like that.

Some of us like those brake lever velcro'd on releases. Like any piece of equipment it needs to be properly installed and used.
...its functionality/reliability is improved.

http://www.getoffrelease.com/

02-1302
http://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7117/13700891354_b31d51ed74_o.png
Image
Image
http://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2938/13700558193_0e0946218e_o.png
03-1304

Who'da thunk?
...and operate while keeping both hands on the control frame and without being a rube golberg type like those favored by your hero, Tad.
I know. You've just stated that you alone have "come up with several". Any of them function when loaded to twice weak link?
Probably...

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24846
Is this a joke ?
Davis Straub - 2011/08/28 15:26:28 UTC

Then again, Russell Brown had us double up behind him after six breaks in a row at Zapata. We couldn't figure out why we had so many breaks so quickly. Maybe just coincidence.
As long as you define "weak link" the way Davis, Rooney, Ryan, Paul do.
Oh, you haven't bothered to build and test anything so you wouldn't know. Never mind.
Even the Bailey releases your mentor hates can be mounted to be operated that way.
The ones that lock up under load? Good thinking, Paul.
It's not rocket science.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TUGS/message/944
weak link material question
Jim Gaar - 2008/04/25 16:42:47 UTC

Try the 130 test "kite" string. It's 8 strand poly weave I think. Worked for 5 years flawlessly on solo AT with a 150+ foot poly towline, center of mass open V bridle with primary and secondary releases.600 tows without a hitch.

It's not rocket science folks. 8 inch piece, single loop with opposing single grapevine knots for solo, 16 inch piece with double loop for tandem.

YMMV
Indeed! Just way too much for Bobby to deal with.
And he's a fucking genius when it comes to this shit.
If you were really interested, instead of just trying to be a shit-stirrer, you would be able to figure this simple sort of thing out for yourself.
"rube golberg"?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=30199
Incident - 2013/06/16
Paul Hurless - 2014/05/11 03:19:34 UTC

Well, rookie, I did build and test one release mechanism without actually mounting on my wing...
Why not? Couldn't figure out how to plug in the toaster oven and still adequately protect the Capybara?
...and it did easily test to a loading of far greater than would ever be encountered during a tow.
Yeah, reminds me a lot of Dennis Excellent-Book Pagen's investigation of and report on the 1996/07/25 Bill Bennett / Mike Del Signore fatality:
Dennis Pagen - 1997/01

There is no known reason for the failure of the tug release since it was tested before and after the accident with a realistic tow force.
The engineering and actuation forces get REAL EASY when you talk about "loading of far greater than would ever be encountered during a tow" and "a loading of far greater than would ever be encountered during a tow".

Chris Bulger's release...
Rob Kells - 1985/09

The trike release had been tested by the manufacturer for a straight pull of 300 lbs.
...had been tested by the manufacturer for A STRAIGHT PULL OF THREE HUNDRED POUNDS! A whole G as long as the trike and glider stayed lined up! What could POSSIBLY have gone wrong with that one?
I did it for personal curiosity and it wasn't difficult.
Yeah, it NEVER IS when you're not mounting it on a glider; talking about easily testing to a loading of far greater than would EVER be encountered during a tow; studiously avoiding mentioning of anything relating to pounds, Gs, required actuation force; and personal curiosity.
Like I said, I am not aerotowing now so after satisfying that curiosity I moved on to other projects.
Global warming, world peace, string theory, time travel... How ya coming with those, Paul?
Mounting it and flight testing it would have not proved anything.
Really? Dr. Trisa Tilletti says...
Dr. Trisa Tilletti - 2012/06

We could get into details of lab testing weak links and bridles, but this article is already getting long. That would be a good topic for an article in the future. Besides, with our backgrounds in formal research, you and I both know that lab tests may produce results with good internal validity, but are often weak in regard to external validity--meaning lab conditions cannot completely include all the factors and variability that exists in the big, real world.
...pretty much the precise opposite.
Like I also said, it's not rocket science.
Neither is rocket science...

Image

...when the engineering is all based on wishful thinking about what will and won't be encountered in flight.
It's just basic mechanics, something some of us do every day.
Yeah, that's all you've ever been and ever will be good for, Paul...
USN ret.
A & P mechanic
Bolting and unbolting parts on stuff that other people have designed, engineered, tested.
As far as a Bailey release locking up, it never happened to me...
It never happened to Davis either. So we don't hafta worry about equipment standards and the catastrophic failures we've documented on Lauren Tjaden, Todd Jones, and Bart Weghorst.
....maybe you're just not using it or taking care of it correctly.
Yeah Michael... To do it RIGHT you should install a cored out golf ball over the stubby little Bobby Barrel so's you can get a decent grip on it...

07-300
Image

...and achieve...

15-413
Image

...an acceptable outcome.
Like everything mechanical, some small amount of care and skill is required to operate and maintain them.
Yeah, make sure you read the owner's manual for the Bailey Release to learn the proper operating techniques and maintenance schedules.
Yes, Rube Goldberg. Look it up if you aren't familiar with that name.
Or just do searches for it on glider forums. It's a term used by total douchebags totally incapable of designing anything worthy of going into the air to denigrate people who aren't.
I think I have figured out why you are so antagonistic towards people and always gleefully trying to point out faults even when they don't exist, things like "whipstalls" when someone mentions a landing problem.
What do you call THAT:

Image

Paul? The placard says thirty degrees up or down. That looks like about placard times three to me. What's it look like to you?

http://forum.hanggliding.org/download/file.php?id=20507
Image
It must be self-loathing because of your realization that you will never have the close, "personal" relationship with your man crush, Tad.
A little queer bating... Usually goes over pretty well on The Jack Show. Probably isn't real conducive to boosting participation in the big picture though.
You're far too old.
And, now, in the proud tradition of Davis, Rooney, and Bob...
You don't have those pre-pubescent qualities that he finds so desireable.
...we play the child molester card - 'cause we've got ourselves painted into corners we'll never be able to get out of. (You spelled "desirable" wrong, by the way.)

You should've followed what happened with those other assholes before took that shot:
- You'll never be able to take it back.
- It won't have the effect you want it to.
- It can't damage me any more.
- It's already cost you in ways of which you're too stupid to even be aware.
Why else would you spend so much time attempting to emulate his disdain and hatred towards every hang glider pilot.
- You don't have anything in the way of PILOTS over there. What you have are a bunch of idiot douchebags constituting a...

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27217
Bad Launch!
NMERider - 2012/09/25 14:21:38 UTC

But what we have in excess here on the Org is generally referred to as a mutual masturbation society. That's where pilots get together and sit around and just jack each other off. That's what I see here in spades.
...mutual masturbation society. You contribute NOTHING to the advancement of the sport, no problems ever get fixed, you're getting old and dying out and getting replaced by paragliders, and you kill off new candidates faster than you can bring them in.

- Over here we have PILOTS, instructors, engineers - and a troll free zone in which solid information is made available unadulterated by your Bob Kuczewski, Sam Kellner, Orion Price, Paul Hurless types. I eliminate the kind of trash that the mainstream forums thrive on.

- Michael doesn't ATTEMPT to EMULATE my disdain and hatred towards every hang glider pilot. We just both happen to love the sport and despise all the sleazebags and morons who've mostly destroyed it.
Good luck with that.
And good luck with what you're doing, Paul. And scan back through the archives of Jack Show history and see how things are trending.

And note that the guy who was one of your mainstays, produced (and deleted) a lot of stunningly beautiful videos of his flying experiences, had something halfway intelligent to say every now and then, and identified your mutual masturbation society as a mutual masturbation society last posted close to eight weeks ago.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: instructors and other qualified pilot fiends

Post by Tad Eareckson »

OK, Paul... I'm a REAL SOCIOPATH. Absolutely AMAZING how I was able to actively participate in the sport for over a quarter century, do a couple of instructor stints on the dunes, serve as a club secretary for a number of years, set an endurance record at one of our local training hills, pioneer a bunch of sites, make it up to just shy of a Hang Five before USHGA ended my career because they were afraid of me making charges I could back up...

So how come YOUR man crush dude...

http://www.hanggliding.org/wiki/HG_ORG_Mission_Statement
HangGliding.Org Rules and Policies
No posts or links about Bob K, Scott C Wise, Tad Eareckson and related people, or their material. ALL SUCH POSTS WILL BE IMMEDIATELY DELETED. These people are poison to this sport and are permanently banned from this site in every possible way imaginable.
...finds it necessary to make a rule like that? How come he finds it necessary to prohibit anyone from saying anything (positive) about me?

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=12682
Landing on your feet (for AEROTOW)- So Dangerous
Jack Axaopoulos - 2009/06/29 14:26:26 UTC

OMG!!! You dont even have wheels!!?!?!?!? Image
YOURE GONNA DIE FOR SUUUUREE!!!! Image
Image
I have a brilliant idea. People who cant land for sh*t.... LEARN TO LAND Image That way when a weak link breaks on you, ITS A NON-ISSUE. Genius huh??? Image
Regardless of how you feel about Bob, Scott, or T** at K*** S******, you're a bunch of fucking cowards for taking shit like that.

I DESPISE Bob but I totally...
miguel - 2012/05/07 17:22:51 UTC

:( Very poor taste, Bob.
...welcome posts about him, have a topic dedicated to him (currently reading well over twenty thousand hits), and will frequently and happily quote him whenever he shoots himself in the foot.

I despise you, quote the fuck out of you, and thoroughly enjoy it. How come you guys tolerate being denied a reciprocal pleasure? Afraid of Jack? Me? Both?
Post Reply