The Bob Show

General discussion about the sport of hang gliding
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=4914
Moderation Requests
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/08/25 05:36:41 UTC

I have two requests of the moderators.

1. Please combine (merge) the two Dockweiler topics since they both cover the same material. Brad Hall started a separate topic for some unknown reason, and it's just confusing for people to have to read both topics and try to figure out who wrote what first.

2. Please unlock the resulting combined topic. The discussion has not run its course because people still have more to say ... otherwise they wouldn't be still posting.

Thanks.
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/08/25 05:51:31 UTC

P.S. I'm not opposed to either topic (hopefully combined) being put in the "Politics of Flying" subforum. I didn't start them in the General section (Joe and Brad did).

The fact that you've got a "Politics of Flying" subforum indicates that such discussions should be allowed there. Please unlock the combined topic so this important topic can be discussed.

The future of hang gliding may depend on USHPA not screwing up our insurance. Having discussions about that problem can't hurt as much as turning our backs on it. USHPA has already proved that by turning their backs on the problems at Torrey and we're seeing the consequences.

Thanks.
Jeff Chipman - 2015/08/26 03:12:40 UTC
Site Admin

Moderation requests are just that, "requests"
Please respect that we are free to honor them or not.
Sure Jeff. I can respect that. It's just that I have no respect whatsoever for sleazy button pushing motherfuckers like you who feel you're entitled to exercise powers with no regard whatsoever for rules or principles.
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/08/27 02:32:47 UTC

That's why I titled my topic as "Moderation Request" rather than "Moderation Demand". Image
I'da gone with:
That's why I titled my topic as "Moderation Request" rather than "Moderation Demand" - asshole.
I don't quote Tad very often...
Probably a good idea for someone in your position.
...but he does make a good point on this topic at:

http://www.kitestrings.org/topic33-690.html#p8278
Tad Eareckson - 2015/08/25 15:35:30 UTC

I'm a bit confused here, Mike, possibly/probably because I lack the degree of wisdom which is a prerequisite for all mainstream hang gliding Site Administrators. But if the conversations had run their courses wouldn't people just stop talking to each other? Why would it be necessary to lock the topics? What would be the point? Wouldn't your talents be better employed locking topics in which the conversations HADN'T run their courses?

"This horse is dead. Therefore I'm shooting it."
Tad goes on to be a bit more graphic in his criticism, but I think you get the idea.
Aw, c'mon Bob, you're leaving out the best part!:
Arrogant cowardly motherfucking Davis clone.
I worked for about two hours getting that bit just right.
So is my request to merge, move, and unlock the topics officially denied?
http://www.shga.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3840
[TIL] About Tad Eareckson
Mike Blankenhorn - 2013/03/12 16:07:44 UTC

We should bury this thread and not give Tad the satisfaction that we are actually wasting our time acknowledging his existence. Yes, this needed to be brought into the light but now we should bury this asshole with some nice cold dirt (metaphorically) and never speak of him again.
Not workin' out so good, is it dickhead?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=43744
Dockweiler insurance extended
Davis Straub - 2015/08/24 02:22:17 UTC

Speculation. We have no evidence of any settlements and we have no idea what if anything First Flight has had to pay.
Brian McMahon - 2015/08/26 18:54:31 UTC
San Diego

It is speculation and it will probably always be that way. There are people that do know, but we'll never get a straight answer. The best evidence is that the settlements we know happened (albeit not the dollar amounts) and possibly upcoming litigation have caused First Flight to step back from taking on further risk.

It's interesting to me that it's all such a big secret, because I can't think of a really good reason why that is the case. On one hand, you could say it's not for public consumption how much money someone got for a gross negligence claim, but the only reason for hiding the settlement is the embarrassment that there was admission of gross negligence (in effect).

Who is being protected by the secrecy? The victim of the gross negligence might be protected out of concerns for their own privacy. The insurance company maybe gets a false sense of protection by keeping the settlement a secret; they prevent others that might have a similar claim from getting the idea that they should pursue it.

The USHPA seems to believe that everything to do with free flight will work better if all accidents, incidents, risk warnings, claims, and insurance costs are kept as secret as possible.
House of cards.
Steve Forslund - 2015/08/27 04:22:29 UTC

So you discuss near misses, fender benders without a claim, past behavior and the like with your auto insurance company?
As an individual? No.
Didn't think so.
So then the insurance company doesn't really know what's going on and what it's paying out? *I* can figure out what's going on - despite the best/worst efforts of u$hPa and nothing I do is $$$ based or interested.

I also post what's going on - and the insurance company is more than welcome to review it.
Brian McMahon - 2015/08/27 14:19:15 UTC

Not sure what my auto insurance has to do with gross negligence claims affecting Dockweiler's ability to renew their policy. I'm lost, please help me understand what you are trying to cogitate.
Fuckin' waste o' space never has and never will have anything to offer.
Ben Reese - 2015/08/27 18:43:08 UTC

Steve F. makes a clear and valid point..
Just like Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney used to at every opportunity before we blew his stupid sleazy ass permanently out of the water.
You don't display all the bad behavior, poor judgement and pilot stupidity so your insurers can add that into their risk cost analysis.
Or so that you can have a legitimate pilot training program, identify problems, hold assholes accountable, eliminate the big killers.
They do that already and assume its worse than they can see.
So then obviously if they see we're making the kinds of legitimate efforts to report and deal with issues the way we used to in the days of Robert V. Wills and Doug Hildreth they'll just extend the assumed lie factor proportionally.
So if you show them then it is assumed its worse yet?
They can see what they need to on the eleven o'clock news.
In addition accidents where a pilot is beyond dumb does not help any reasonable pilot avoid accidents.
Name some reasonable pilots in this sport - total fucking asshole incapable of writing at reasonable grade school level proficiency.
Displaying this info only labels HG as a sport with dumb pilots.
Dumb? Yes. Pilots?
Only dumb pilots would want to see other dumb pilots and only other dumb pilots would not understand how dumb this would be.
Count me as the ultimate dumb pilot...
Bob Kuczewski - 2015/07/11 18:16:54 UTC

Hi Tad,

I just wanted to offer a general thanks for all of the information that you capture and preserve on your site. I find it to be a helpful reference when all else fails.
...pigfucker.
Since there are very few dumb HG pilots actually flying about then there is no value in displaying dumb stuff for them.
Right. Decades of magic fishing line that broke one out of four times with the glider under control, crashed people left and right, and made it impossible to get up in good soaring conditions then a couple years ago everybody suddenly became happy with fishing line that does absolutely nothing to increase the safety of the towing operation.
If any dumb pilots do proliferate then Darwin's 1st law takes care of dumming us down to that level.
Or we use them as tug pilots and appoint them Pilots In Command of our gliders.

Here's a partial list of fairly recent Darwin Award winners from this sport:

2009/01/03 - Steve Elliot
2009/01/04 - Jonas Blanton
2009/08/31 - Roy Messing
2009/09/19 - Bill Vogel
2009/11/27 - Chris Thale
2010/06/26 - John Seward
2010/10/13 - Lemmy Lopez
2011/10/28 - Lois Preston
2011/01/15 - Shane Smith
2011/04/09 - Yossi Tsarfaty
2011/05/20 - Eric Mies
2011/06/06 - Tim Martin
2012/04/05 - Dave Seib
2012/06/16 - Terry Mason
2013/02/02 - Zack Marzec
2013/05/30 - Grant Bond
2013/06/23 - Kevin O'Brien
2013/07/21 - Luis Rizo
2014/08/30 - Adam Parer
2014/09/29 - Joe Julik
2015/01/24 - Trevor Scott
2015/03/27 - Kelly Harrison (and person of varying age)
2015/05/09 - Markus Schaedler
2015/05/17 - Scott Trueblood
2015/06/20 - Bertrand Delacroix
2015/06/26 - Trey Higgins
2015/07/23 - Javier Yunquera
2015/08/23 - Rafi Lavin
2015/08/24 - Craig Pirazzi

Fuck all you Jack and Davis Show assholes who spout off about how devastated you are about the losses of these wonderful individuals then allow this miserable little piece o' shit to piss all over their memories.

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39347
Please explain yourself without deleting me
Orion Price - 2014/10/01 00:15:56 UTC

The problem with tad:

- He open and notoriously taunts the families of dead pilots. This is seriously low. If you think that only someone without balls could do such a thing, then you'd be right. He literally has no testicles. He had them surgically removed. Ask him about it, he'll tell you about life walking around with a flat sack. Low T, it's just a number.

- A chance to defend himself? Do the dead pilots he lampoons get to defend themselves? Does anyone on his own forum get to defend themselves? Both are a no. He bans most everyone on his forum.
And who's ACTUALLY doing this - asshole?

There ARE quite a few motherfuckers in this sport whose amendment to the list would bring me unmitigated JOY and I wouldn't give half a rat's ass about the effect on family, friends, assholes who'd have anything to do with them but I don't take an ounce of joy in any of those on the list and don't regard or treat them with the kind of total contempt Ben does.

Tim Martin, Dave Seib, Grant Bond, Markus Schaedler, Trey Higgins... Might have ended up just as dead in similar circumstances.
Joe Faust - 2015/08/28 01:13:27 UTC

Quite oppositely, since near the beginning of hang gliding there has been a faction of caring people wanting to know and share every incident in hang gliding. Such body of information may then be used by various smart people to advance the awareness of hang gliding. Avoid what has been done to hurt people and things.
Yeah, but not on The Bob Show.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2093
USHPA sends safety letter about HG & PG fatalities
Frank Colver - 2015/08/29 04:26:36 UTC

I received by e-mail this letter from USHPA talking about HG & PG fatalities. Here is the lead-in sentence:
There are some recent trends in fatal hang gliding and paragliding accidents that you, as a pilot, should know, so that you can make better decisions managing the inherent risks of our chosen pastime.
It is also on the web, here is the link:

http://ushpa.aero/safety/safetynotice_20150828.pdf

I'm wondering why the HG fatalities began increasing so much starting in mid 2014? Image
They didn't. Count the stupid incompetent negligent bullshit that we know causes fatalities as fatalities despite the fact that these assholes totally get away with it 99.9 percent of the time and you'll see that there's absolutely nothing significant going on.
Sam Kellner - 2015/08/29 23:58:12 UTC

That's a good question, probably. Hopefully there is a simple answer.
Yeah. This sport tolerates, allows, encourages participation by / inclusion of total dickheads such as yourself.
Regardless.

The timing to announce this with the spike in HG is to diminish the PG stats.

Could that be?
Definitely.

Bummer that your 2012/06/16 Terry Mason fatality couldn't have been used for that purpose - 'cause, at the time, u$hPa judged that the biggest bang for the buck could be derived from shredding the report and never acknowledging that it ever happened. Whenever you have one that low profile there's really not much of a choice.

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2093
USHPA sends safety letter about HG & PG fatalities
Rick Masters - 2015/08/30 00:32:02 UTC

Open letter to Frank Colver from Rick Masters

Frank,

On August 28, 2015, after reading "Safety Reminders" by USHPA Accident Review Committee Co-Chair (HG)...
...and total duplicitous dickhead...
...Mitchell Shipley, you asked on the U.S. Hawks Forum, "... why the HG fatalities began increasing so much starting in mid 2014?"

The short answer, Frank, is because it is not true. 2014 was a stellar year for hang gliding safety in the United States.
Bullshit. Getting away with crap, getting lucky for a while on the dice rolls, does not make for a stellar period for safety.
Things did not start going down hill until the Jean Lake joyriding and towing debacle in March, 2015.
It wasn't:
- joyriding. Joyriding is what WE do. It was thrillriding.
- towing. Had shit to do with towing. This was for-profit fringe activity.
Like Shipley, I also keep a database of free flight accidents.
Sloppy, biased, politically motivated, pretty much useless.
Mine, however, is entirely independent...
Bullshit. What it really needs to be independent from is you.
...and global. A global database, by its nature, provides greater insight than one arbitrarily truncated by national boundaries.
But then ya don't get to say, "NOTHING like this has ever happened before (in Canada).
Unlike Shipley, I am not constrained by the legal issues...
Or anything remotely resembling honesty and fairness.
...pertaining to a corporation so I am willing to provide my opinion...
Fuck you and your opinion.
...and share my data.
And your biased bullshit data.
This is important because it appears to me that it is no longer possible for a corporation in the United States to provide effective accident analysis without incurring significant...
...and richly deserved...
...legal liability. This is a serious and disturbing development that stands in the way of the association's obligation to membership to provide genuine accident analysis and tends to sidetrack the issue into the la-la land of strangely perceived political correctness and meaningless obfuscation and delay.
It's been building for decades.
...For instance, nowhere in the letter are mentioned the words "towing," "collapse" or "tandem."
Show me something in which towing and/or tandem had relevance.
It is not possible to have a genuine discussion of free flight safety without touching on these issues.
It's impossible to have a genuine discussion of pretty much anything with an asshole like you.
Let us examine part of this letter in detail.
Dear Fellow Free Flight Pilot,

There are some recent trends in fatal hang gliding and paragliding accidents that you, as a pilot, should know, so that you can make better decisions managing the inherent risks of our chosen pastime.
How?

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25321
Stop the Stupids at the USHPA BOD meeting
Mark G. Forbes - 2011/09/29 02:26:23 UTC

We can establish rules which we think will improve pilot safety, but our attorney is right. USHPA is not in the business of keeping pilots "safe" and it can't be. Stepping into that morass is a recipe for extinction of our association. I wish it were not so, but it is. We don't sell equipment, we don't offer instruction, and we don't assure pilots that they'll be safe. Even so, we get sued periodically by people who say we "shoulda, coulda, woulda" done something that would have averted their accident.

It's not just concern for meet directors and policy makers...it's about our continued existence as an association. It's about minimizing the chance of our getting sued out of existence. We're one lawsuit away from that, all the time, and we think hard about it. I would LOVE to not have to think that way, but every time a legal threat arises, it reminds me that we have a very dysfunctional legal system in this country (note: not a "justice" system...there's little justice involved) and we have to recognize that reality and deal with it.
Mark G. Forbes - 2011/09/30 23:21:56 UTC

Here's how it really works:

- Member submits an accident report. Could be the pilot who had the accident, or some other witness.

- Accident report is sent to Tim to maintain legal privilege. Tim reviews the report and determines whether there's significant legal risk associated with it. He may redact certain parts (personally identifiable information, etc.) if in his opinion exposure of that information poses a risk to us. If the report is very risky, he may decide that it can't be shared further, and will notify the ED about it. He may also notify our insurers if he sees a potential for a claim, as is normal practice for any incident where we are aware of such a potential.

- Redacted report goes to the accident review chairs, for incorporation into periodic articles in the magazine. Articles focus on root causes of accidents, not on personal narratives or details.

The whole procedure is outlined in SOP 03-16, which you can read by logging into the USHPA website and clicking on "Policy Manual".
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=27736
Increase in our USHpA dues
Mark G. Forbes - 2012/12/20 06:21:33 UTC

We're re-working the accident reporting system, but again it's a matter of getting the reports submitted and having a volunteer willing to do the detail work necessary to get them posted. There are also numerous legal issues associated with accident reports, which we're still wrestling with. It's a trade-off between informing our members so they can avoid those kinds of accidents in the future, and exposing ourselves to even more lawsuits by giving plaintiff's attorneys more ammunition to shoot at us.

Imagine a report that concludes, "If we'd had a procedure "x" in place, then it would have probably prevented this accident. And we're going to put that procedure in place at the next BOD meeting." Good info, and what we want to be able to convey. But what comes out at trial is, "Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, my client suffered injury because USHPA knew or should have known that a safety procedure was not in place, and was therefore negligent and at fault." We're constantly walking this line between full disclosure and handing out nooses at the hangmen's convention.
The more important a crash report is with respect to sweeping safety reform the more likely it is to get shredded by our total piece o' shit lawyer. And anyone who starts making a stink about the fact that you motherfuckers won't even comply with the stuff that you have on your own books gets marginalized, blacklisted, and forced out of the sport.
First a few facts to add to the graphs below showing fatality trends:
Wouldn't adding a few facts to the total crap you publish in the way of crash and safety information just hopelessly confuse people?
Faced with the appalling fatality rate of early hang gliding, the first chairman of the United States Hang Gliding Association's Accident Review Board, insurance actuary Robert V. Wills, wrote in the January 1975 Ground Skimmer, "We must have your help in recording all prior fatal accidents all over the world. We can no longer afford to have people guessing out loud on how many fatalities there have been.
And here was USHGA's response:
Robert V. Wills - 1976/10

Because there was some feeling that people involved in hang gliding, and people observing the sport from outside, should become preoccupied with accidents and fatalities, the editor of Ground Skimmer asked me to refrain from submitting accident summaries on an every-issue basis.
And the cells of that evil malignant little conflict of interest influence have been replicating out of control ever since - for eleven months shy of four decades now.
"If we fail in our responsibility to establish a reliable central data bank on hang glider accidents," he added...
..."we're going to be doing exactly what's best for the lawyer to whom we've handed total control of the US division of the sport. So keep up the great work, guys!"
"...we are going to look like a happy-go-lucky band of daredevil adventurers to some politician or judge and you may one day no longer be able to soar free as a bird, regardless of what our true safety record may be."
Good. Very few of us have been able to soar as free as birds...

http://www.chgpa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3600
Weak link question
Jim Rooney - 2008/11/24 05:18:15 UTC

Well, I'm assuming there was some guff about the tug pilot's right of refusal?
Gee, didn't think we'd have to delve into "pilot in command"... I figured that one's pretty well understood in a flying community.

It's quite simple.
The tug is a certified aircraft... the glider is an unpowered ultralight vehicle. The tug pilot is the pilot in command. You are a passenger. You have the same rights and responsibilities as a skydiver.
It's a bitter pill I'm sure, but there you have it.

BTW, if you think I'm just spouting theory here, I've personally refused to tow a flight park owner over this very issue. I didn't want to clash, but I wasn't towing him. Yup, he wanted to tow with a doubled up weaklink. He eventually towed (behind me) with a single and sorry to disappoint any drama mongers, we're still friends. And lone gun crazy Rooney? Ten other tow pilots turned him down that day for the same reason.
...at any time within our distant memories and the assholes in this sport who tolerate scum like you, Mark, Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney in it will have gotten some percentage of exactly what they deserve.
Unfortunately, global data collection was arbitrarily terminated by the USHGA in the mid-1980s.
And gutted for the US in the mid-1990s.
- From 2005 through 2014, combined hang glider and paraglider fatalities per annum have ranged from five to nine, averaging about six.
I care very little about paraglider fatalities. They tend to have little to no relevance to what goes on in hang gliding.
- In 2014, we experienced nine total fatalities in the US.
Nine that u$hPa has allowed us to hear about anyway.
My records for 2014 indicate 9 total fatalities in the USA, plus Bud Wruck's fatal crash in Slovenia:

PARAGLIDING
1) Paul MacDonald flew into power lines - HI, 2/10/14
2) Roland Allen Carter got wrapped in his canopy performing aerobatics - UT, 2/23/14
3) Bence Pascu flew into the ground performing aerobatics - ??, 3/21/14
4) Eric Jonathon Hill died following a collapse - UT, 4/20/14
5) Kevin Smith died following a collapse - CO, 6/20/14
6) Bud Wruck of Damon, TX, died following a collapse in Slovenia, 7/3/14
7) David Norwood died following a collapse - WA, 7/16/14
8) David Pearson died following a collapse performing aerobatics - CA, 10/28/14
9) Kjell Sporseen flew into the ground performing aerobatics - ??, 11/30/14

One electrocution, five collapses and three aerobatic mishaps. Hang gliders don't experience sail collapse. The pendulum gyrations that parachutists call "acrobatics" are not comparable with the true aerobatics of hang gliders. Eight out of these nine paragliding fatalities stem from flaws inherent to parachutes and are not something hang glider pilots can do anything about.

HANG GLIDING
1) Joseph Julik lost control of a new topless glider during landing rotation - WI, 9/29/14
Bull fucking shit. He ELECTED to throw it away at a hundred feet in order to prep for stunt landing he was intent on pulling off at zero feet.
By any measure, only one hang gliding death in all of the U.S. represents a spectacular success.
By my measure it represents a grotesque stupid failure. And then we have to look at the scores of assholes we NEEDED to kill who came through yet another year smelling like roses.
That is what we hang glider pilots accomplished in 2014.
I know I sure did MY part. And Bob's been making a pretty good show of things since last November too.
For a dangerous sport, that is something to brag about.
Sure Rick, whatever you say.

We can forget about Adam Parer - 2014/08/30 - 'cause that wasn't in the US.

Then we have Eric Mies who quaded himself at Funston also doing aerobatics with inadequate clearance on 2011/05/20 but didn't check out until late last August. If you hang on long enough to complete the calendar year it doesn't count anywhere.

John Claytor got his neck seriously rearranged on 2014/06/02 when the Ridgely douchebags were trying to run flight ops in a zillion mile per hour crosswind with a tug driver Pilot In Command who didn't fix whatever was going on back there by giving his passenger the rope, a pro toad release that proved not to be easily reachable, and a Rooney Link that didn't work when it was supposed to. And he disappeared from the sign and nobody's heard a word from or about him since. For the purposes of hang gliding he got killed a lot deader than Holly Korzilius.

Same day...

32-1826
Image

Just shaken up a bit. Didn't break his fuckin' neck.

Two days later at Ridgely... John Dullahan has to get choppered out to have his back pieced back together after an approach that didn't work out too well.

34-3509
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5597/15703164475_348903ed84_o.png
Image

No problem. The glider took all the impact.

We have tons o' shit going on all the time and we tend not to hear about non fatal stuff that doesn't make it to YouTube.
But how is this presented by the USHPA?
- In 2014, we experienced nine total fatalities in the US.
That doesn't look so good, does it?

What happened?

They mixed in paragliding fatalities with hang gliding fatalities. Just what are hang glider pilots supposed to do about paragliding safety when many of us won't even fly them because we believe them to be too dangerous? By reporting fatalities in this manner, the USHPA renders safety accomplishments in hang gliding meaningless.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS like WHAT? We luck out with a low fatality rate for a five month window? What was it we'd just started doing differently to deserve the better results? If we'd ACCOMPLISHED anything the crash rate graph would've dropped down to the lower light, leveled off, and stayed flat there. Fuckin' Rafi Lavin ACCOMPLISHED something by always skipping stomp tests and having his defective sidewire hold for the better part of eight months after the ball dropped?
It strikes me as odd that the Hang Gliding Co-Chair would present a fatalities list in this manner.
It would've stricken ME odd if that sleazy motherfucker HADN'T.
- Since the beginning of this year, we have experienced fifteen fatalities:
Bummer. I myself haven't experienced any for the past several years.
8 Hang Gliding and 7 Paragliding. The 2014 fatality rate was high.
Again, hang gliding experienced only one fatality in 2014.
Adam Parer. And Eric Mies. 2011 or 2014. Pick one. You don't get to pretend he never existed. James Brady got shot in the head on 1981/03/30 and when he died on 2014/08/04 it counted as a homicide.
The 2014 fatality rate for hang gliding was very low.
So the fuck what?
It's just that nobody's ever going to know it because of the USHPA's flawed premise.
1. It's not flawed. It's CALCULATED.

2. Who gives a flying fuck? Were doing EXACTLY the same things this year, reaping a bloodbath for our efforts, and continuing to do NOTHING to address this string of "bad luck".
"Hang gliding is dangerous, too," goes the paragliding mantra. Perhaps Shipley didn't want to draw heat by pointing out something that went against paragliding mythology.
The motherfucker is a commercial conflicted interest. What is it you'd EXPECT him to be doing?
...The 2015 rate is already more than double the annual fatality rate for the last decade--and the year is not yet over.
Let's look at 2015:

PARAGLIDING
1) Clayton Butler stalled a small paraglider and spun to the ground - HI, 1/15/15
2) Billy Baker hit a cliff on a small paraglider - WY, 1/22/15
3) Ronald Faoro fell from harness - CA, 3/1/15
4) Siegfried Muhlhauser collapse culminating in a spiral dive - UT, 5/1/15
5) Junichi Nakamura was found dead - CA, 5/17/15
6) Richard Moren had a collapse - WA, 6/14/15
7) Gregory Knudson had a collapse - FRANCE, 7/14/15
8) Dale Brockett unknown - CA, 7/14/15

Two killed themselves on speedwings, one fell from his harness and five died from collapses or unknown events, which usually turn out to have been collapses. Anyone flying speedwings is on my short list. Allowing them into a hang gliding organization makes as much sense as allowing grenade launchers into hunting clubs.
Just get Bob to concoct justifications for banning them.
As for paragliders, they collapse in turbulence and I've learned to expect them to do that in hot weather.
What does hot weather have to do with turbulence?
Hang glider pilots can't do anything about this and it makes no sense to harangue them for it.
Fuck no. Took decades to replace Rooney Links with Tad-O-Links and then it wasn't hang glider pilots doing shit. It was all tug drivers / flight park operators.
HANG GLIDING
1) Kelly Harrison tow lockout tandem joyriding - NV, 3/28/15
Bull fucking shit. That was NOT a lockout. It was a clusterfuck fringe operation incompetent beyond all description - even for hang gliding.
2) Arys Moorhead child passenger, tow lockout tandem joyriding - NV, 3/28/15
1. See above.
2. Why specify that he was a:
- child? Is his death more statistically significant 'cause was little and cute?
- passenger? Kelly was a fuckin' passenger on that ride.
3) Markus Schaedler was found dead - CA, 5/9/15
Any more dead than he'd have been on a paraglider in the same circumstances?
4) Scott Trueblood flew straight into mountain - NY, 5/17/15
Should've practiced flying on the uprights more to have been able to prevent a headfirst impact. Salad bowl on a string helmet too.
5) Bertrand Delacroix spun to ground - MD, 6/20/15
1. Why?
2. Would a paraglider have spun in given the same circumstances?
6) Edgar Higgins was found dead - NV, 6/26/15
1. He went by "Trey".
2. Any more dead than he'd have been on a paraglider in the same circumstances?
7) Rafael Lavin flying wire snapped - CA, 8/23/15
1. Rafael Lavin skipping one too many stomp tests.
2. What happens when *A* flying wire snaps on a paraglider?
8) Craig Pirazzi blown off cliff launch - UT, 8/24/15
1. Craig Pirazzi blown off AN APPROACH TO a cliff launch.
2. In winds a paraglider couldn't and wouldn't have been flying.
Two died in a commercial joyriding accident under tow...
Fringe activity clusterfuck.
...two were found dead...
Two were trying to work thermal lift too low and slow.
...one died in a spin...
How the fuck do we know that? Here's the relevant u$hPa passage/sentence:
Slowly descending to approximately 400 feet AGL the pilot then initiated some maneuver that was not witnessed but was followed by several full revolutions that a pilot witness on the ground saw and that appeared to be a fully developed spin until impact with the ground, causing fatal injuries.
And all the motherfuckers most closely associated with that incident and individual have been silent as clams.
...one had a structural failure...
Bullshit A structural failure is what happens when you blow an aerobatics maneuver and load things up to well over half a dozen Gs. This motherfucker took off without any structure and rendered his glider uncontrollable at a wee bit over one G. It's not a structural failure when you take off with a 1.2 G wire or one of the basetube pins in your pocket.
...one flew into a cliff and another was blown off a cliff.
The latter wasn't a flying incident. It was a ground handling issue. It's a bit of a stretch counting it as a hang gliding fatality. We'd have had a similar outcome if a glider had gotten away from somebody and knocked a wuffo off the cliff.
It is doubtful that the USHPA instructors' cabal that profits from joyriding will ever enforce strict interpretation of the FAR 103 tandem exemption for instructional purposes, but if they had, we would be looking at six, not eight, hang gliding fatalities.
Find a single instance of one u$hPa instructor criticizing another u$hPa instructor for doing or not doing ANYTHING.
Pilot error is always the leading issue in hang gliding.
Only Markus, Scott, Bertrand, and Trey were participating in the sport as anything resembling PILOTS. And Scott was a bit iffy on that score.
I suspect flying near stall was a factor in three fatalities, barring medical issues, because when hang glider pilots are found dead, they usually stalled their gliders at low altitude and dove into the hill.
Yeah, motherfucker?

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1563
Platform Launching (PL) Draft suggestions needed
Bob Kuczewski - 2014/06/06 18:21:51 UTC

I also like that this discussion emphasizes that breaking a weak link is something that can be practiced - just like we practice stalls - so we understand how to handle them and to not be afraid of them. I had a terrifying stall experience with my instructor when I was learning to fly airplanes back in the 70s. For a long time I feared getting close to stall. As long as I feared stalls, I was not spending much time getting comfortable with them, and that didn't make me a better pilot. So there's a lot to be said for safely learning to handle the inevitable rather than trying to come up with some way to avoid the inevitable.
Nice job Bill !!!! ImageImageImageImageImage
http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1822
Oz forum
Rick Masters - 2015/05/22 00:28:25 UTC

We have a firewall. It's BobK. He is the one outstanding moderator in the entire arena of freeflight. He is the only moderator or site administrator with the courage to say no to the garbage-mongers. Without BobK, hang gliding's future doesn't stand a chance.
Spins are hard to maintain in an intact hang glider.
I don't think I've ever done one beyond a half turn.
I almost died in one, though, when my harness zipper line caught on a sail tensioning lever in the Sierras.
1. HPAT.
2. That's not a spin.
A pilot can box himself in to a bad outcome with wishful thinking.
How 'bout a:
- Rooney Link
- Dragonfly tow mast breakaway protector
- pro toad bridle
- easily reachable bent pin release
- tug driver who can fix whatever's going on back there by giving us the rope
- skipped:
-- stomp test
-- hook-in check
- moment at one:
-- banishes all concern about launching unhooked
-- has taken care of it
-- done it
-- put it out of his "mind"
- long final
- transition to upright for more flare authority and better head protection
- old Frisbee in the middle of the field

A pilot who deliberately boxes himself in isn't a pilot.
Delayed maintenance...
What was the maintenance interval Rafi should've adhered to with respect to a sidewire with an asymmetrically crimped nico? Fifty hours? Six months?
...and cliff launches in turbulence without a wire man come to mind.
There haven't been any issues involving cliff launches in turbulence without wire crews this year to date.
Professional film crews often invite disaster.
1. But amateur film crews are OK? So could we secure agreements with professional film crews that they not be reimbursed for services rendered during critical phases of flight ops?

2. So should we have a training program and Special Skills signoff for flying in the vicinity of a professional film crew?
- There have been twenty-four pilot fatalities since the beginning of 2014:
I'd tend to go with zero since 2011/06/06 when Tim Martin and a shitload of other flyers in the Chattanooga area got caught in a gust front.
As I mentioned earlier, I am focused on global accident numbers.
Then try to focus on Adam Parer a little better.
I know of 161 paragliding fatalities and 22 hang gliding fatalities since the beginning of 2014.
22? You're doing a lot better than I am. You list one for last year and eight for this one to date. I can't get as much as half your total.
Hopefully, these represent the larger fraction of the true numbers.

The constant throughout is that hang glider pilots, by and large, kill themselves by pilot error while soaring parachutists, by and large, are killed by their paragliders suddenly collapsing in normal turbulence, then going out of control.
Tell me how electing to fly a craft in turbulence very well known to become uncontrollable in turbulence isn't pilot error.
Pilot error can be addressed...
Good freaking luck, asshole. Bob, along with the mainstream industry, encourages and rewards pilot error as a foundation for "free flight".
...but the inherent risk of collapse in paragliding cannot.
Anything like?:

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27086
Steve Pearson on landings
Steve Pearson - 2012/03/28 23:26:05 UTC

I can't control the glider in strong air with my hands at shoulder or ear height and I'd rather land on my belly with my hands on the basetube than get turned downwind.
Because of this fact, I doubt that real improvements in paragliding safety can ever be accomplished.
Therefore we should persecute Max Marien and Brad Geary unmercifully for doing really cool precisely controlled stuff in glassy smooth coastal air.
Hang gliding certainly has nothing to do with paragliding attrition.
Nah, most hang gliding attrition is the result of hang gliding attrition.
And the premise at the heart of the USHPA analysis...
Analysis?
...that the fatality numbers can be combined to yield meaningful information, is simply ridiculous.
Duh. Mark G. Forbes stated a month shy of four years ago in black and white and virtually unambiguous terms that u$hPa's accident review and safety programs were total frauds. Exactly what are you expecting out of u$hPa other than more of the fraudulent, self serving, politically motivated crap we've been seeing for decades?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

Ya notice the way Bob comes up with scores of insane reasons with zero foundations in reality on why a foot launcher CAPABLE of doing lift and tug shouldn't be REQUIRED to do lift and tug...

- Lifting your wing six inches into the turbulent jet stream will almost certainly result in instant death.

- Nosing your glider up enough to generate the five or ten pounds of suspension tension you want to confirm connection and leg loops will critically reduce the foot traction you need to effect yaw control.

- Pilots need to be free of the requirement of allowing suspension to be tightened so's they won't be needlessly endangered when launching unassisted in gusty gale force winds and operating with 0.01 percent safety margins.

And then he goes nuts on Gabe Jebb for kiting a paraglider in light air without a helmet and gets the most odious and totally useless safety regulation in the history of the sport shoved down everybody's throat.

And now we've got Craig Pirazzi trying to move up to launch position unassisted in strong air with a cliff generated rotor. Mother Nature enforces an undesired roll and tug that REALLY confirms that he's safely connected to his glider and has both leg loops. And he gets sucked off the edge a second or two later and a second or two after "launch" his glider's definitely broken and he's likely knocked out or killed slamming back into the cliff face.

Quarter century plus Hang Four rating with all the relevant merit badges and more, certified glider, helmet, parachute, locking steel carabiner, backup loop, sidewires replaced five months ago, hang check, hook knife do him no good whatsoever. Might as well have gotten liquored up, thought of the happiest thoughts instead of using a glider, and run off the cliff naked.

Very high profile and expensive fatality and extraction, greatest guy in the history of the sport, tons of dear friends sickened that something like this could happen...

And what's Bob have to say about this one and the recommendation that wire assistance be made mandatory for winds over eighteen miles per hour in any situation in which there's a reasonable expectation of a rotor threat?

How 'bout something about the example this would've set for all the innocent little people of varying ages watching this really cool award winning IMAX Utah Tourism Board film if Craig had been able to hold things together well enough for a clean incident free launch?
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=43744
Dockweiler insurance extended
Brian Scharp - 2015/08/29 18:47:57 UTC

Got it. All the people who have died hang gliding were obviously too stupid to survive it. The mistakes they made will surely never be repeated by us brilliant alpha dudes and dudettes. If a mishap is repeated, it's just one more dummy gone. Sweep 'em under the rug, it'll help our insurance rates. If we're so smart, why don't we devise a test to keep the unfit dummies out? It would sure give us a lot less to not talk about.
So does:

Image
Ben Reese - 2015/08/30 14:01:12 UTC

Gee Brian,
I did use the word "all" but I clarified its use in the paragraph below.

""You don't display all the bad behavior, poor judgement and pilot stupidity so your
insurers can add that into their risk cost analysis. They do that already and assume its worse than they can see. So if you show them then it is assumed its worse yet?""

All the bad behavior & poor judgement & pilot stupidity, summarized again.

So an keen observer would see your use of "all" as expanded and exaggerated beyond
My example.

Thanks for trying..
Brian Scharp - 2015/08/30 21:02:25 UTC

I must be one of the few dumb ones. I always have and still do see value in the open discussion of the very things we're needing to hide for the sake of insurance.
New Kite Strings rule...

No brilliant alpha dudes or dudettes.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=43744
Dockweiler insurance extended
Ben Reese - 2015/08/31 09:55:02 UTC

Where is the data base of dumb suba divers, parachutists, skate boarders, surfers, ATV riders, Bicyclists, Harley riders cruising "hands up don't shoot", wind surfers, kite boarders, boaters, Snow mobiles, horse riders, runners, cliff divers, kayakers, skiers, snowboarders, water skiers, Climbers And other self indulgent sports?

Data bases are found where people do professional work in jobs where they are forced to Participate in dangerous activities. The selection process weeds out the dumb ones or unqualified ones. Then the data base is used to inhance safety and protect the employer And public liability for all parties as well as, say "you should know better, we told you so."

In the case of hang gliding there is no standard performance since it is all subjective and judgement Driven. There is base skill and safety standards of manufacture as well as pilot proficiency Guidelines that are not strictly enforced by any formal authority. Our enforcement of standards is by mutual agreement and by civil law as in liability for negligence of obvious safety hazards to others. As far as our selves as pilots we are on our own and must use sound judgement to succeed. Therefor airing continuous examples of bad judgement or plain negligence does the vast majority of pilots no material good. It only adds fear and potential liability to our sport from uninformed Parties who will never understand how safe hang gliding really is.

So focusing on safe and proven methods with positive results is best for all parties concerned. Pilots new and old need to know that poor judgement and willful disregard for safe practice is The greatest threat to themselves and our collective sport.

Displaying a database of dumb actions or willful disregard for common sense only hurts our sport.

Combining HG and PG accidents as equal risk is wrong.
Where is the data base of dumb suba divers, parachutists, skate boarders, surfers, ATV riders, Bicyclists, Harley riders cruising "hands up don't shoot", wind surfers, kite boarders, boaters, Snow mobiles, horse riders, runners, cliff divers, kayakers, skiers, snowboarders, water skiers, Climbers And other self indulgent sports?
1. Database, skateboarder, windsurfer, kiteboarder, snowmobile, waterskier - one word.

2. What's a "suba" diver?

3. Please explain your "thinking" with respect to capitalizing "Bicyclists", "Snow mobiles", "Climbers", and "And".

4. What the fuck is 'Harley riders cruising "hands up don't shoot"'?

5. Database refers to information stored, accessed, analyzed, manipulated, by computer software and hardware, and hang gliding for all practical purposes predates computers. Ditto for skateboards, windsurfers, snowboards. Ditto plus for scuba, parachutes, surfing, ATVs, bicycles, snowmobiles, horses, running, cliff diving, kayaking, skiing, climbing.

6. Oh. These are all self indulgent sports. Nobody's ever used scuba, parachutes, ATVs, bikes, snowmobiles, horses, running, kayaks, climbing to stay alive in various environments and/or do jobs which benefit others, society, wildlife, the planet.

7. Where are the controversies over the fundamentals of these other pursuits you listed?

- Name something remotely equivalent any of them have ever had to the third of a century long bullshit insanity we endured over Donnell Hewett's Infallible Weak Link and the Aerotow Industry's Standard Aerotow Weak Link.

- Show me some bicycles which position their brake actuators within easy reach such that the rider surrenders one hundred percent of his directional control whenever he needs to slow down or stop.
Data bases are found where people do professional work in jobs where they are forced to Participate in dangerous activities. The selection process weeds out the dumb ones or unqualified ones. Then the data base is used to inhance safety and protect the employer And public liability for all parties as well as, say "you should know better, we told you so."
1. Show me the database which supports those statements you just pulled outta your ass.
2. Sure, just look at the coal mining industry for a textbook example of what you're talking about.
In the case of hang gliding there is no standard performance since it is all subjective and judgement Driven.
Yeah, it's all opinion based. And you can tell the individuals who have the best opinions by looking at how well they get along with everybody else.
There is base skill and safety standards of manufacture as well as pilot proficiency Guidelines that are not strictly enforced by any formal authority.
They're not enforced at all. You can do whatever the fuck you feel like short of acting in a manner contrary to the interests of the Corporation.
Our enforcement of standards is by mutual agreement and by civil law as in liability for negligence of obvious safety hazards to others.
I kinda like the way gravity works. Took Kelly Harrison - who'd never earned a single demerit from u$hPa through his long and illustrious career - permanently out of the equation. Bummer that it took a person of a varying age out with him - but we can take comfort in knowing that he won't ever be taking any additional people of varying ages out.
As far as our selves as pilots we are on our own and must use sound judgement to succeed.
Right. When you pay a couple of grand to get through enough u$hPa certified instruction you're not actually learning anything that'll be of significant use in the actual atmosphere - you're just buying a ticket to enter the arena from the cartel that's cornered the ticket market. Then you go over to The Jack Show and ask questions to find out which individuals have the most popular opinions.
Therefor airing continuous examples of bad judgement or plain negligence does the vast majority of pilots no material good.
Precisely. The of examples of bad judgement and plain negligence are consistent with a lot of what they've been taught in their standup spot landing training and what the most popular people with the most popular opinions are reinforcing.
It only adds fear and potential liability to our sport from uninformed Parties who will never understand how safe hang gliding really is.
1. So how safe really is it?

- We hear about the fatalities only because it's impossible for the training programs, flight parks, and local and national hang gliding programs to cover them up. Definitive career enders we may find out about only because somebody happened to post something on YouTube. There've gotta be tons of serious injuries which interrupt careers or permanently dissuade individuals from further participation that we never hear about.

- We have a rough idea about the number of participants but no fuckin' clue about airtime or numbers of flights.

- We've got a national organization that's stated quite openly that all incident reports which u$hPa's corporate lawyer determines pose or may pose liability threats are shredded before anyone else gets a glimpse at them. And pretty much ANY incident report is gonna pose a liability threat to the national organization.

So we're by design ALL uninformed parties who will never understand how safe hang gliding really is - or isn't.
So focusing on safe and proven methods...
As all good Focused Pilots do.
...with positive results is best for all parties concerned.
For decades all parties concerned focused on the safe and proven standard aerotow weak link, the focal point of our safe towing system, by force from the best and brightest controlling the Aerotow Industry while it did NOTHING but crash launching gliders left and right. Then immediately after one of them killed a tandem aerotow instructor pro toad and good friend of Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney everybody and his dog ceased focusing on it and went with an EXTREMELY unsafe and unproven method that had never had and still hasn't had ANY positive results for ANYBODY.

So how many times per post can you pull stuff out of your ass before running low and/or causing tissue damage?
Pilots new and old need to know that poor judgement and willful disregard for safe practice is The greatest threat to themselves and our collective sport.
1. Maybe you could specify a list of safe practices for us. Or refer as to some authority who can.

http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?t=31781
Another hang check lesson
Alan Deikman - 2014/09/23 19:47:06 UTC

For my part I will just refer you to the classic Tad Eareckson essay which I call "the gun is always loaded" which is a bit overworked but probably all you will ever need to read regarding FTHI. A lot of people will find it gores their particular sacred Ox, but I have never seen anyone point out a flaw in his logic.
http://www.rmhpa.org/messageboard/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4258
HG accident in Vancouver
Tom Galvin - 2012/10/31 22:17:21 UTC

I don't teach lift and tug, as it gives a false sense of security.
Nobody has ever contradicted Alan or pointed out a flaw in Tad's logic yet we can find zero evidence of any instructor on the planet ever having taught the lift and tug hook-in check to students.

2. I don't want you or assholes who will have anything to do with you anywhere NEAR "OUR" collective sport.
Displaying a database of dumb actions or willful disregard for common sense only hurts our sport.
How's the ol' asshole doing?

Back in the days of Robert V. Wills and Doug Hildreth we had pretty good efforts at reporting crashes, organizing data, analyzing patterns, recommending strategies. We also had pretty high levels of participants and activity. Find somebody today saying that:
- we've got a ghost of a legitimate incident reporting system
- our sport is doing better than an Antarctic ice shelf
Combining HG and PG accidents as equal risk is wrong.
Sorry, one sane statement in a post that long doesn't win you any points with me.

Part of me wants to just dismiss you as a babbling lunatic whom no one should waste any time on but I think the right call is to get you unmercifully hammered from as many directions as possible to quickly eliminate you as a potential threat. Davis was long ago widely recognized as the self serving sociopath he is and has always been but was allowed to fester away anyway and the sport has consequently paid a heavy price.

Kai Martin just (2015/08/31 19:08:09 UTC) did a pretty good hatchet job on a load of other crap you pulled out of your ass and used to pollute the cybersphere with Davis's full blessing. We need to keep you in a crossfire until you're reduced to Rooney level.
User avatar
<BS>
Posts: 422
Joined: 2014/08/01 22:09:56 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by <BS> »

When viewing a veritable bullshit cornucopia it's difficult therefor to be complete.
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=43744
Dockweiler insurance extended
Ben Reese - 2015/08/31 09:55:02 UTC

So focusing on safe and proven methods with positive results is best for all parties concerned. Pilots new and old need to know that poor judgement and willful disregard for safe practice is The greatest threat to themselves and our collective sport.
Yeah, obviously.

- Never do stomp tests 'cause sooner or later you're gonna break a wire.

- Always do hang checks with as many of Joe Greblo's Cs as you can remember.

- Opt for unassisted windy cliff launches over dolly and platform tow launches 'cause Komplexity Kills like no other force in aviation.

- If you must tow use:

-- the safest weak link possible and get some good tandem instruction to learn how to react to the increase in the safety of the towing operation it affords

-- an Industry Standard release within as easy a reach as possible

- Always thank the tug pilot for intentionally releasing you, even if you feel you could have ridden it out. He should be given a vote of confidence that he made a good decision in the interest of your safety.

- On approach put your hands at shoulder or ear height where you'll be unable to use them to control the glider no later than the beginning of final because transitioning in ground effect is so dangerous that you might as well stay prone on the basetube and belly in.

- Constantly work on perfecting your flare timing so you'll have the best chance of stopping safely on an old Frisbee in the middle of a narrow dry riverbed with large rocks strewn all over the place whenever the need arises.

- Keep a copy of the excellent article by Mike Meier, "Why Can't We Get a Handle On This Safety Thing?" taped to your basetube for review whenever the traffic thins to a comfortable level.

But didn't you just finish telling us:
In the case of hang gliding there is no standard performance since it is all subjective and judgement Driven.
Tell me how those two idiot statements can possibly be reconciled.

- We aren't allowed to use conventional aviation theory established at the beginning of the last century or ten year old kid common sense due to inconsistencies with most of the most common and popular hang gliding opinions.

- We can't maintain a database of crash statistics to get a feel for the stuff we're doing wrong and stop doing the same things over and over in hopes of getting better results 'cause:
-- only dumb pilots would do or be interested in anything like that and none of us are dumb pilots
-- we don't want the public and insurance industry to see just how dumb and totally devoid of common sense we all are
-- displaying a database of dumb actions or willful disregard for common sense only hurts our sport
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=43744
Dockweiler insurance extended
Brian McMahon - 2015/09/01 15:52:47 UTC
Ben Reese - 2015/08/27 18:43:08 UTC

Steve F. makes a clear and valid point..

You don't display all the bad behavior, poor judgement and pilot stupidity so your insurers can add that into their risk cost analysis.
I'm not sure if the rest of the USHPA would agree with that, but hiding bad behavior, poor judgement, and pilot stupidity suggests that the organization knows it has a serious problem.
Bloody goddam right. Everybody and his fuckin' dog is totally aware of that. u$hPa set itself on an unsustainable a month shy of five years ago when it went full bore into crash data suppression mode on the lunatic assumption/proposal that doing so would reduce its exposure to liability issues.
The car insurance analogy isn't appropriate...
None of that fuckin' asshole's analogies are appropriate.
...because bad behavior, poor judgement, and driver stupidity results in accidents, tickets, or jail time by authorities. The insurance companies can easily weed out the risky drivers from the safer drivers. There is nothing like the police for the USHPA, except for reports from witnesses.
And lotsa good YouTube videos - often posted by wuffo types who can't be threatened or intimidated by the hang gliding industry.
There is no judicial system in the USHPA (except the kangaroo court assembled from time to time to oust anyone too bold or troublesome).
NO!!! REALLY???
I understand that it's virtually impossible for an organization the size of the USHPA to be able to police itself to the degree that drivers of autos are policed and completely free flight is the goal.
So ya naturally do the next best thing: appoint all your biggest douchebags as Committee Chairs and educate the public to understand that what would be considered gross criminal negligence out in the real world is Standard Operating Procedure and/or "TYPICAL" in hang gliding.
But ignoring warnings, turning a blind eye to danger, and supporting the guilty are not going to solve any problems...
They're gonna solve SOME problems. We're not seeing any more Zack Marzec videos showing Rooney Links installed on his pro toad bridle and we abruptly stopped hearing Jim Keen-Intellect Rooney telling us how sick and tired he's gotten "refuting" Tad-O-Link arguments year after year.
...especially if they are not one-off problems, but systemic in nature.
The totally malignant stuff works pretty well.
I don't pretend to have the answers to how to fix the problem...
Certainly not by talking with douchebags on The Davis Show and aligning yourself too closely with Bob and Rick Masters.

I actually DO have the answers - which is precisely why I was ousted without so much as a kangaroo court justification. Matter o' fact... I'm fifty times as proud of that status than any of the crap I had put on my card in my quarter century plus of membership.
...but I doubt that holding the current course is going to last.
It's heading straight for the rocks. All ya need to do to confirm that in no uncertain terms is read a post or two from Ben.
There is a huge difference in hang gliding today and 20-40 years ago.
Totally unrecognizable. Just a dozen years ago u$hPa was still at least retaining a few pretenses. I can't IMAGINE what it must be like for a halfway intelligent individual to come through this looking glass and think what he's seeing must be normal.
The Internet, video footage, and cheap computers. In 10 or 20 years, you may find that you will not be able to fly legally with out a transponder/recorder.
I could live with that. Starting eleven years ago when the FAA aerotowing regulations were expanded to cover ultralights u$hPa prohibited me from flying with a safe and legal weak link configuration. If anybody's ever been killed by a transponder or recorder I haven't heard about it.
Few care if you kill yourself...
I've got little left to live for beyond watching hang glider people kill themselves.
...but if you're doing anything that can harm another person or their property, that's when the data becomes valuable.
Jon Orders made - under HPAC SOPs - two critical mistakes which got his tandem thrill rider killed and earned himself an expulsion, felony conviction, and prison sentence and the undying hatred of his victim's family.

Kelly Harrison committed more moronic procedural atrocities than can be easily counted, got himself and his tandem thrill rider of a varying age killed in front of said thrill rider's family, and is remembered as a really great guy who served as a valuable wake-up call for all professional pilots, privileged information decimators, and muppets to be more attuned to risk management issues and reread the excellent article by Mike Meier, "Why Can't We Get a Handle On This Safety Thing?".

Good job, Brian. We need to keep hammering this motherfucker for at least three reasons...

- to slow hang gliding's inevitable slide into the sewer

- to set an example as to what will happen to like motherfuckers with ambitions of pulling this kinda bullshit

- because Davis is giving him a platform (Ben's given full rein to post whatever he feels like without official rebuke while many of us who AREN'T totally full o' shit have been sabotaged, locked down, deleted, banned)
User avatar
Tad Eareckson
Posts: 9161
Joined: 2010/11/25 03:48:55 UTC

Re: The Bob Show

Post by Tad Eareckson »

http://www.ushawks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=884
The Bob Show
Bob Kuczewski - 2011/12/13 05:55:39 UTC

There's a list of user names in the "Building the US Hawks" forum. But while those are the members, we don't really have a way for them to vote because we haven't built our "Constitution" yet. Our constitution will define who leads the organization, how they're elected, what their goals are, and what their limitations are. We haven't been able to have that discussion because you've thrown an endless stream of monkey wrenches at us. I've had to deal with your profanity, your attacks on other members, your strong weak link theories, your lift and tug theories, and your hopelessly long and repetitive posts. So we have not been able to actually define how the organization should be structured. From your complaining above, you don't seem to want a dictatorship (which I agree with), but in your other posts you've ridiculed the idea of allowing members to vote. So your vision for who will actually run the organization is undecipherable.
And then you made The Bob Show a safe place for people of varying ages to visit two days later. And that was three and three quarters years ago. So what are your excuses now?
So we have not been able to actually define how the organization should be structured.
As an absolute dictatorship. u$hPa's an evil corrupt total shitheap but it's had all of its officers and board members elected since the beginning of time. And you've been doing what you're good at and best suited to for your entire five year plus history.
So your vision for who will actually run the organization is undecipherable.
And yours is totally transparent - polar opposite of what you claim in your mission statement.

And the problem is that you're only attracting "members"/minions/sycophants who are comfortable with what's going on - the ABSOLUTE LAST types of people one would want on board to build a democratic organization with principles of individual freedoms, rights, protections, responsibilities.

So what we're seeing after five years is EXACTLY what we'd predict we'd be seeing after five years. You've got all your battens in upside down and backwards, Bob. It's never gonna fly anywhere. And I'm having a real hard time believing you ever actually wanted or intended it to.

P.S. Notice the enormous surge in popularity my strong weak link theories enjoyed three seasons ago? Now at least in that regard everyone and his dog has gone to the tow park that Tad runs. And that success had absolutely nothing with willingness to respect the opinion and compromise with the position of any asshole who feels like walking up and running his mouth. REAL reform tends to flow from the precise opposite.
Post Reply